@Nobleeagle100 that "athiest" chick is selectivly being qouted, mostly out of context. If you want someone who gives anyone a bad name, this... sad little man... the one who put this video up... would be a better example.
In primul rând nu mi se pare frumos ca denigrezi imaginea unei conaționale și în acelas timp spui ca ești mândru sa fi roman. Cu privire la numărul de ateiști din România, și eu cred ca e destul de redus cel puțin pe hârtie. Eu m-ași încadra la agnostic, dar lafel ca majoritatea nu sărim în sus sa strigam în gura mare apartenența/ne-apartenență noastră religioasa. Mai ales într-o țară în care dacă nu crezi in dumnezeu majoritatea te considera nebun... sau mai rău. +la final zomg era ironica.
We are talking about one little woman here, not a communist state. Communists may be atheists, but atheists aren't necessarily communists. I know mI am not. I don't know anyone who is. You, sir, are mentally unbalanced.
actually you didn't reply to the real points she made in the video
she said that the argument from beauty wouldn't work because there are so many places where so many things are fucked up
but i don't wonder you didn't reply to that statement. you're nothing more than a troll.
the last thing i wanted to mention is that if you think you could insult atheists by saying they are stupid, do you think anyone would really give a shit about your opinion? if you don't pay respect why sould we?
"there is no morality without religion" you see this statements are the reason why nobody takes you serious.
you don't even concider whats going on on the other side of the fence. you just continoue to spout stupid shit like that.
but something different
you want to tell me that some poor kid in india that livse in some kind of slum would have to thank god because the world is so awesome? wow, your invisible friend demands a lot.
if you can only manage to get through the day if you live in your little fantasy world then please, go on.
but the thing is that if your god wants to accomplish something and the only way for him to do it is by making people suffer than he/she/it seems very incompitent to me.
She doesn't lie. She tells the truth as she sees it. She just doesn't happen to agree with you. You, who calls any dissenter a liar, are either an arrogant sonofabitch or a total dingbat. I figure it's just possible that you are both.
It comes to statistics and referendum, Romanian people are the only people in the world who were born Christian (we were not "Christianized" by the sword, law, or any constitution).
Our culture is Christianity, and Christianity is our culture.
Difficult to understand for those who do not have a culture.
It's very clear that, at least in your mind, yours is the only culture. You are an ignorant fool. You are a Christian because you were "born Christian." That means you never learned anything else. You were taught from babyhood to believe what your ancestors believed. All very well for the mindless. Then you say that others have no culture because they disagree with you.
Seems to me you said you speak Latin. Just because your "culture" is old doesn't make it superior. It CERTAINLY doesn't make YOU superior. I don't know how to say "go fuck yourself" in Latin. So, for a poor, uncultured American, English will have to do.
Well, Jesus said "the truth shall set you FREE". Plato also believed that we were born with shackled feet and necks. As an atheist, you are determined by your physical needs, by your environment, and you can only find fulfilment in this world, you are a slave of this world, a pleasure seeking slave. Of course, it's nicer to be a succesful "slave" than to suffer in order to go to Heaven, but I am just saying that the concept of "freedom" is not so clear.
But, since Vyckro tries to make some points, and he doesn't consider everything to be useless, as I do, he keeps making videos, which are interesting to some, since he has 84 subscribers, and counting. In Romanian, his videos would have been more popular.
Mihaicosmos has a point, you don't need religion to get a job, you don't need for any practical purpose, actually, and yes, atheists read a lot, and take advantage of many things in this world, but that has nothing to do with spiritual evolution. It is hard for people which have everything in this world to get an impulse to search for a superior, or transcendental meaning, they live like very intelligent animals, and discussing with them is pointless.
well she does prepare hes videos but so do you and the difference is huge!!!
she has no education - how do you know?? why is this a relevant argument??? you think that you being a teacher makes you more respectable???? you must be kidding me!!!
Bare in mind that i never spoke with her. I just like her vids and dislike yours. Religion is stupid and you supporting it makes me sick.
Religion should be something private between you and your god(whoever it might be)!!! but don't bring it into the public square like in romania and try to indoctrinate the young generation.
Nobody asks you about religion when going to get a job, but about informatics math and etc.... Don't see the point to teach it in schools! IQ and education level and religiosity are negatively correlated!! That should be a sign for you
Felicitari V pentru film si pentru faptul ca o ridiculizezi pe aceasta maimuta sociopata,bine i-ai zis :))O impostoare penibila care-si expune viata privata pe YT,incercand cu disperare sa iasa-n evidenta atacand exact cele mai sensibile puncte ale oamenilor,macar de ar face-o corect..sunt curioasa,oare despre Talmud sau despre ritualuri evreiesti,suprematia rasiala si ura impotriva a tot ce este ne-evreu,a vorbit vreodata?Majoritatea acestor circari "ateisti"care ataca crestinismul,sunt jidani!
1da Cristina este ca un copil bolnav care loveste in propia mama, eu i-am trimis a doua zi dupa cea facut filmul cu arabi date despre circumcizie la evrei si cum au reusit sa impuna in america acest ritual ca politica medicala (la ei cand se naste un copil ii fac si circumcizie). I-am trimis asta pt ca era ingrijorata de femeile batute in islam. La evrei ritualul este oribil rabinbul isi foloseste gura si dinti.
I-am mai trimis si alte lucruri si ca urmare ca nu am lasat-o impace ....
Nu stiu despre ce film cu arabi de-al ei vorbesti,pt ca nu ma uit la porcariile ei,mi-a ajuns sa vad cateva,sa ma lamuresc,o impostoare,probabil platita de vreun ONG de-a lui Soros..n-ar fi singura,atat timp cat se prezinta ca ateista,dar nu e impariala si critica doar 2 religii la infinit,nimic despre evrei,e pe acelasi calapod cu ceilalti 2giboni!Eu cand am dat de ea,i-am scris pm civilizat in care o intrebam dc nu vorbeste si despre TALMUD/evrei si NU mi-a raspuns!RABINUL SUGE PUTZA DE SANGE!
Impostorii astia sunt de-o nemernicie crasa...si ipocrizie mizerabila...de ce naiba nu recunosc ca ei sunt evrei si ca defapt ei nu cred in nimic dar ne urasc pe noi astia "creStini"-"muzzies"..stau cat e ziua de lunga pe YT,defapt pe tot netul,l-au umplut,batjocorind cu ironii de giboni circari gretosi credintele altora,vorbind cu o aroganta si cu o trufie penibila si libidinoasa despre obiceiurile si credintele UNORA(islamsicrestinism)NICIODATA DESPRE EVREI
Uite cat de usor se joaca ei cu niste lucruri atat de importante cum ar fi holocaustul,cat de usor santajeaza ei in numele romanilor si Romaniei..se vede ca aceasta maimuta idioata,care se crede vreo vedeta pt ca are n maimutoi subscrisi la ea,adica un fel de rege peste prosti si retardati;o cretina cu gesturi copiate de la americani(yo yo ma'maan),cu mentalitate copiata de la cryptojidanul 'ateist' Pat Condom sau de la jidanul poponar grasul circar'aroganatheist',n-are nimic al ei,totul e copie
voiam sa zic,se vede ca aceasta patachina idioata,care se prezinta cu mandrie ca o fata de pe centura(nu-i de mirare ca au sarit fraierii libidinosi,poate manca si gura lor ceva)nu e romanca,sau are in familie ex-comunisti-jidani-bolsevici,altfel ar fi suferit si ea in amintirea celor jertfiti de istorie,in amintirea celor care au facut posibil ca noi sa fim"aroganti"acum la pc si sa ne dam buricul pamantului,atotstiutori;nu ne putem batjocorii identitatea si istoria in halul asta si asa e varza
da asta i-am zis si eu mie mi-a raspuns mult timp pana am acuzat-o ca este mincinoasa (si m-a blocat) cand intr-un film il acuza pe Base ca nu i-a acordat unui tanar dreptul la sinucidere si incearca sa spuna ce Base este un "fanatic religios."
Ea ataca religia pe model american si in acel film se chinuie sa scormoneasca niste cauze si pt Ro.
In discutile purtate cu ea mi-a fost clar. nu stie nimic desore Romania, doar "crimele inchizitiei" si "Hitler a fost crestin" este in capul ei
The 6 century AD is considered the time when the Romanian people finished forming, because the Romanian language was already cristalized, and the proto-Romanian from South of the Danube became Aromanian (with some Greek influence) and North of the Danube it became what is now called Daco-Romanian (with some Slavic words), basically the separation came after the Slavic migration. Anyway, my point is that what happened after the 6 century AD had a lot to do with Christianity.
In Romania we don't advertise everything, our culture was not replaced but United States cynicism and obsession for profit yet, not completely. See, Romania is between East and West from a spiritual point of view, the material world has no sense for us without a spiritual explanation, we believe in an objective, divine moral, not a man made opinion. We don't retreat from this world, but we need a deep meaning to it.
On Romania's territory Christianity imposed itself gradually, and in the Middle Ages, in villages, some Dacian rituals still existed, as pointed out by Mircea Eliade in his book "From Zamolxis to Genghis Khan". But since the Romanian people finished forming in the 6 century AD, we can say that a lot of its culture is connected with Christianity , and many saints and theologicians were born in Romania. I can maybe understand that being a Christian is hard to do for a genius,
So who decided that the Romanian people finished forming in the 6th century? Did you close the boarders then and say: "Well everyone who's going to be a Romanian is now Romanian. We're done! The rest of the world are officially foreigners and will be recognised as such forever!" or what?
how very interesting that you totally avoid commenting on zomgitscriss' reason for posting her video: it's not about "non-atheist" comments -you WERE trolling when you sent pms to her subscribers (a violation of §6E of youtube's terms of service, by the way).
using statistics that are seven years old provides a very weak argument. and constantly misrepresenting atheism as being the same as communism is intellectually dishonest.
Very good video, too bad you didn't have time for Michael the Brave or Stephen the Great and Holy, and also for Dimitrie Cantemir, Mihai Eminescu, Emil Racovita, George Enescu, Constantin Brancusi, Henri Coanda, Emil Palade, Nicolae Paulescu, Nicolae Teclu, Mircea Eliade, Emil Cioran, Lucian Blaga, Nichita Stanescu etc.
And your point is? I'd like to see the source of this. And do you even know what a minority is? Clearly if atheists are of less numbers than religouse folk, they are a minority.
And even if Criss is wrong on one statment, why does that make her a lier about everything? and how does that make your god real above any other god?
She does not tell the truth. She is incredible, perhaps, because she has forgotten how to do anything but speak lies on camera in her bedroom.
She is just a blonde liar who wants people to look at her as she deceives them. Shameful...a complete waste...also no historical, rhetorical, or artistic sense.
Sources to show that romanian athiests are not a minority. And a minority, no matter how small, does not deserve to be treated as second class citizens.
Plus you still avoided compleatly her main argument which was concerning evidence for evolution. Which I can provide if need be, FYI.
1: I've seen that. Basicly, your whole argument against her consists of "NO U!". Plus, your source still shows romanian athiests ARE a minority because they are much lower in population than those of a religon. Again, no matter how small, that counts as a minority.
2: For a start, there is no such thing as "Evolutionism". Those that accept evolution except it under the basis of it being testable and provable, which it can and has been.
Atomic theory, Gravity, plate techtonics, germ theory. Those will NEVER become Laws or facts.
A theory is made up of large set of Facts laws observations, that has predictive and explanatory power and is very unlikely to change with new data. It is the Pinnacle of science.
If you think "Gravity" is just a theory, Greathiway, why do you suppose it it called the LAW OF GRAVITY? It is a scientific FACT--unlike Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution, which remains nothing more than an ill-conceived, erroneous hypothesis. Evolution is false: that is why no one has proven it as a fact and no one ever will.
Darwin is a disgrace to the nautral sciences. His theory is bankrupt: collectively the human race ought to get over it like a bad case of Swine Flu.
Your semantics are misleading: a fact remains a fact and cannot honestly be called a theory by anyone who already knows that the hypothesis (theory) has been PROVED.
As a matter of fact, the LAW OF GRAVITY may be utilized to support a new (or old) hypothesis, but it is dishonest doubletalk to call a PROVEN theory anything other than FACT.
Darwin's THEORY of evolution is a failed hypothesis. There is no evidence to prove it: it is NOT A FACT and never will be.
theory does not mean the same thing as hypotheses i think you need to read a science book and i actually took my science book and directly put what it said on what those actually meant and there is so much evidence for evolution that anybody who actually knows the basics of dna should know there is evidence and theres also the fossil records if evolution were false they would not teach it as a fact im sure lots of people would love to prove creationism but they CANT sorry
Don't be sorry, perrson22, the burden of proof remains on the heavy-laden backs of the Darwinist doubletalkers, one or two of whom probably wrote your science book.
Try reading a dictionary and a text on logic--if you know what that means. By the way, especially in terms of empirical research the words "theory" and "hypothesis" are often, perhaps usually, perfectly synonymous.
The "fossil records" are a canard: they have not established the descent of any new species from a different one.
scientist must not be bias its one of the rules a scientist must fallow and what burden of proof if evidence for something were in size the evidence of evolution would be a large mountain in size the fossil record has transitional forms example: three toed horses to on toed horses. they did an experiment with some flies they put them in different glass containers and fed them two different kinds of food then they tested to see if they can mate but they couldn't they are now different species
Too bad that "scientists" regularly ignore "the rules a scientist must fallow," persson22, especially when they happen to be rampantly biased Darwinists.
Worse still, they don't have the common sense or decency to write honest text books for children which would simply announce that they have fallen for Darwin's false premises and wasted their entire carreers to date.
Infertility doesn"t constitute OR PRODUCE ANY NEW SPECIES. I hope it won't waste your time further as Darwin's folly has.
definition of species: a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding. The species is the principal natural taxonomic unit, ranking below a genus if two animals cant mate they are two different species and how can you take a proven fact and say its not true but you believe a book thousands of years old that says bats are birds is true if a scientist were to find actual proof that evolution were false he,d win the noble prize
If you think that the existence of infertile specimens constitute evidence of new species, perrson22, take a walk down the street and find a woman over 70-years old. Then tell her that she is no longer a human being because she can't bear children any more.
Wake up. You won't win the Nobel Prize for using logic and common sense, and the Nobel committee doesn't have enough money to pay $1,000,000 to everyone who has already seen through a silly falsehood dubbed "scientific."
no a 70 year old woman is still a human the lady just cant produce egg cells because she just had some natural changes what happened with the flies that they separated the flies and while separated the flies still mated with their own group and the definition for species i got from the science book.
I think you may be getting a little closer, perrson22, but you still miss the basic point.
Your science book uses misleading definitions of terms designed to confuse immature minds and provides goofy examples to support their intentionally obscurantist jargon. It boils down to a bunch of semantic boondoggles all of which dissolve under scrutiny.
can u please provide some evidence that the science books are using misleading terms please because i also looked those terms in dictionaries its the same basic definition
ovesly you dont know how evolution works here is an exaple: there is a blue box and you put some grey snails in it and some birds that eat snails some of the snails have a mutation and sometime that mutation is good making that snail less likely to be seen by the birds those snails are more likely to pass on there genes and eventually the snails are blue
Wrong again, perrson22, and frankly I have forgotten more about Darwin's erroneous theory than you currently know or are ever likely to know.
A mutation only proves that a defective gene pattern occurred after mating in one resultutant specimen. Multiply that by a trillion and you get the same basic results: NO NEW SPECIES HAS EVER RESULTED FROM GENETIC MUTATIONS.
they have seen good mutations in the wild and in the lab lots of times good mutations are just rare here is an example of a good mutation: bacteria are now immune to antibiotics some of the bacteria got that mutation and people who took the antibiotics killed off the ones that did not get the mutation
It is unscientific to say "they have seen good mutations in the wild" or anywhere else, perrson22.
Valid genetic research has revealed significant information about recessive and dominant genes, but mutations are a dead end and no new species ever result from them.
Darwinism has retarded the growth of knowledge because misguided and unscrupulous men have conducted many expensive, inconclusive and insignificant experiments to support a bankrupt theory based on obviously false premises.
if your soo sure your god made the earth please provide some proof i know all of the claims you said that evolution is lie is complete bullshit please explain why scientists would lie about that please explain why creationists have to lie to keep their claims yet you say their telling the truth and here is a example of a good mutation bacteria are now immune to antibiotics some of the bacteria got that mutation and people who took the antibiotics killed off the ones that did not get the mutation
Regardless of the reasons for falsehood, the reality of misformation and deception exists. The blind and indifferent acceptance of lies is commonplace in contemporary society. Therefore, if you like to believe what is false, you will have plenty of company.
Axioms are intuitively (innately) or logically obvious to man. Therefore, no "proof of God's existence" (e.g., an ontological argument) is ever necessary. Objections to axioms are insubstantial.
my exeptance of evolution is not blind there is lots of evidence but creationism is blind there is no evidence of it and if you think there is please provide the evidence science is not the practice of destroying religion science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment i got that definition in my dictionary god is not observable by science
The only thing you managed to "prove" was that: 1) your idea of what the word "minority" represents differs from hers and the rest of the world and that 2) census data on atheists and agnostics (same shit, btw) is way below margin of error; congratz;
PS: the census lady in 2002 actively refused to mark the "atheist" checbox for my form, which was a huge abuse on her part. This has happened to a few of my friends too. That goes to show how reliable the census is.
How presumptuous on your side, silly boy; For the record, the romanian part of "good" guy's message stated that we (atheists) are trampling this country (romania) with our lies;
I dont give a shit about you and your nationalism goodguy;
GoodGuy4life199, sunt total de acord cu tine,ne-am saturat de toti papitoii astia manipulati care manipuleaza la randul lor,sunt goi,fara suflet,doar carcasa si atat...constiinta si sufletul ti le da Dumnezeu,dar nu ti le da cu forta...asta e ceea ce nu inteleg ei...SUNT LIBERI SA ALEAGA...asta e frumusetea vietii...Dumnezeu ne iubeste,tocmai d-aia ne-a lasat LIBERTATEA...
Faptul ca ei sunt "aroganti" si "ironici" vis-a-vis de EL (asa cred ei) nu produc decat mila...sunt oameni chinuti si rai...
Pt ei libertatea este "libertate" atata timp cat esti de partea lor.
Ateisti de pe YT isi impart voturile intre ei si se subscriu unul la altul.
Exact ca niste copii care se grupeaza pe bisericute. Eu pe de alta parte sunt liber sa fiu impotriva unui alt crestin/musulman/etc.
Ateismul asta a devenit o boala care se ia, si toti respecta cu sfintenie prima porunca Ataca cresini si musulmani pt crimele din vechiul testament dar niciodata pe cei ce l-au scris
What can i say Vyckro, beautiful, just wonderful, i liked the part with the Turks, indeed, Vlad Tepes did what he had to do, too bad the Hungarians, (huns/2nd grade turks) killed him. But your people saved so much time for the rest of Europe to get ready, Romania was indeed the second gate after Constantinople !!!!!
I really enjoyed it, 5 stars and fav ofcourse ! Looking forward to see more, and ZOMGitsCriss, she want's to be a model, this is her way to get attention :)
That atheist chick really gives blonde women a very bad name!!!
Nobleeagle100 8 months ago
@Nobleeagle100 that "athiest" chick is selectivly being qouted, mostly out of context. If you want someone who gives anyone a bad name, this... sad little man... the one who put this video up... would be a better example.
wotmot223 3 months ago
Communism destroyed the Eastern bloc, not atheism. Fallacy of division and guilt by association.
The rest of the video is a kind of pointless part of pointless YouTube fued.
SoVvM 8 months ago
In primul rând nu mi se pare frumos ca denigrezi imaginea unei conaționale și în acelas timp spui ca ești mândru sa fi roman. Cu privire la numărul de ateiști din România, și eu cred ca e destul de redus cel puțin pe hârtie. Eu m-ași încadra la agnostic, dar lafel ca majoritatea nu sărim în sus sa strigam în gura mare apartenența/ne-apartenență noastră religioasa. Mai ales într-o țară în care dacă nu crezi in dumnezeu majoritatea te considera nebun... sau mai rău. +la final zomg era ironica.
aliienslayer1 1 year ago
So what? So Romainians are mostly idiots. What's your point?
rehabwales 1 year ago
@rehabwales
no, not only ZOMGitsCriss !
VyckRo 1 year ago
If you could speak a little more clearly maybe I could watch your videos and take them into consideration, but the monotone makes me ill!
bluebirdschless 1 year ago
loool Vyck your too funny man. and yes it does "look like someone".
darpachief 1 year ago
I try to show people what atheism! :(
atheit as ZombyCrisss
VyckRo 1 year ago
be vewy vewy quite where wooking for afeeists
Bellantoni 2 years ago 4
what?
VyckRo 2 years ago
you kinda sound like elmer fudd
Bellantoni 2 years ago
If the percent is really so small, why do you make a whole channel to persecute one atheist? Why are you so fearful of that one woman?
Largo64 2 years ago
because I know what communism is
VyckRo 2 years ago
We are talking about one little woman here, not a communist state. Communists may be atheists, but atheists aren't necessarily communists. I know mI am not. I don't know anyone who is. You, sir, are mentally unbalanced.
Largo64 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Many, if not most of the Atheists are Commies of different shades.
leostomicek 2 years ago
Vyckro
did you already notice that you didn't adress ANY points that she actually made in the video.
or are you just too much of a wanker to accept that you are nothing more but a stupid little troll that can't form an argument?
i think its the case
oh and just one last thing
atheism doesn't automaticly mean communism.
redFISTofEUROPE 2 years ago 7
Not only that I reply to all so-called "arguments" of the blonde, but I have proved beyond any doubt, that she lies, again and again.
See tha first part of the discussion "Facts and things I like (tag) - ZOMGitsCriss Exposed (AUDIATUR ET ALTERA PARS)"
with her, I can not say she is stupid because she already said that she is Atheist
VyckRo 2 years ago
actually you didn't reply to the real points she made in the video
she said that the argument from beauty wouldn't work because there are so many places where so many things are fucked up
but i don't wonder you didn't reply to that statement. you're nothing more than a troll.
the last thing i wanted to mention is that if you think you could insult atheists by saying they are stupid, do you think anyone would really give a shit about your opinion? if you don't pay respect why sould we?
redFISTofEUROPE 2 years ago
dude, you are those who do not know respect. Ther is no morality without religion.
And Zombie demonstrates that at every opportunity.
I reply to the arguments, that she sent for me.
Beauty there is anywhere if you know to search it
VyckRo 2 years ago
"there is no morality without religion" you see this statements are the reason why nobody takes you serious.
you don't even concider whats going on on the other side of the fence. you just continoue to spout stupid shit like that.
but something different
you want to tell me that some poor kid in india that livse in some kind of slum would have to thank god because the world is so awesome? wow, your invisible friend demands a lot.
but you can't understand that, can't you?
you're a joke
redFISTofEUROPE 2 years ago 3
Obviously that morality comes from religion, read ancient literature, life was so cheap before Christianity(or other major religion).
Before Christianity, the work was considered humiliating, women only good for breeding and crime a normal thing.
the only political regime based on atheism have failed.
French Revolution, in the the commune of paris, in the communist revolution from Russia in cultural revolution of Mao,
VyckRo 2 years ago
Everything in this world has a purpose, even if you do not see it.
There are things that can have repercussions over hundreds of years or in another continent
VyckRo 2 years ago
well
if you can only manage to get through the day if you live in your little fantasy world then please, go on.
but the thing is that if your god wants to accomplish something and the only way for him to do it is by making people suffer than he/she/it seems very incompitent to me.
redFISTofEUROPE 2 years ago
The fact that atheists do not understand anything about religion is a proof that are they are atheist.
"Making people suffer" no, t's all like stone thrown in a lake, all is headed to Apocalips (Revelation).
To reach the revelation you must go through many trials, (too difficult for an atheist)
VyckRo 2 years ago
again
you describe us as stupid just becasue we use commin sense instead of following some retarded dogma.
you deluded yourself to a degree that i can't help you any more
i'm sorry mate but i just can help you to join the rest of us in reality
i'm sorry for you but i can't help you as long you try to bite the hand that wants to feed you
redFISTofEUROPE 2 years ago 3
She doesn't lie. She tells the truth as she sees it. She just doesn't happen to agree with you. You, who calls any dissenter a liar, are either an arrogant sonofabitch or a total dingbat. I figure it's just possible that you are both.
Largo64 2 years ago
A lie is, for example when she invented passages from the Bible that are not there
VyckRo 2 years ago
Name one. I quote the Bible all the time. Many Christians don't believe me because they haven't read it. Perhaps you haven't either.
Largo64 2 years ago
Or when she says that the number of atheists is growing in Romania
VyckRo 2 years ago
The number of atheists, agnostics and unchurched is growing pretty much everywhere. People are getting smarter.
Largo64 2 years ago
In my country, it diminishes with the communist elders dying
VyckRo 2 years ago
In that case, your country is unlike most of Europe, where atheism is growing as believers die off. Jesus must really love Romanians.
Largo64 2 years ago
It comes to statistics and referendum, Romanian people are the only people in the world who were born Christian (we were not "Christianized" by the sword, law, or any constitution).
Our culture is Christianity, and Christianity is our culture.
Difficult to understand for those who do not have a culture.
VyckRo 2 years ago
It's very clear that, at least in your mind, yours is the only culture. You are an ignorant fool. You are a Christian because you were "born Christian." That means you never learned anything else. You were taught from babyhood to believe what your ancestors believed. All very well for the mindless. Then you say that others have no culture because they disagree with you.
Largo64 2 years ago
Nop, I was not educated "from babyhood"
my family is not a religious family, I went to church just for Easter and Christmas.
I found researching the history of religious beliefs, (See Mircea Eliade Histoire Des Croyances Et Des Idées Religieuses )
VyckRo 2 years ago
So now I have found my ancestors faith, who died for 2000 years defending the faith, never impose ther religion on others.
2000 years of battles with Catholics, Muslims, atheists, on order to be left alone
VyckRo 2 years ago
No! You do not have a culture, "mickey mouse" is not a culture.
You have not recognized the myth of Plato, and could not answer the simple question of philosophy
How do you know that you exist?
VyckRo 2 years ago
Cogito ergo sum.
Seems to me you said you speak Latin. Just because your "culture" is old doesn't make it superior. It CERTAINLY doesn't make YOU superior. I don't know how to say "go fuck yourself" in Latin. So, for a poor, uncultured American, English will have to do.
Largo64 2 years ago
"how to say "go fuck yourself" in Latin"
something that includes the word "mentula"
"Cogito ergo sum"
It is not enough, You have not demonstrated that
VyckRo 2 years ago
You are a commie... :-))
leostomicek 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no
not really
redFISTofEUROPE 2 years ago
What do you know about reality son?
leostomicek 2 years ago
i think its amazing how you guys are able to avoid valid critizism and just keep on trolling.
redFISTofEUROPE 2 years ago
What valid criticism are you speaking about?
leostomicek 2 years ago
Well, Jesus said "the truth shall set you FREE". Plato also believed that we were born with shackled feet and necks. As an atheist, you are determined by your physical needs, by your environment, and you can only find fulfilment in this world, you are a slave of this world, a pleasure seeking slave. Of course, it's nicer to be a succesful "slave" than to suffer in order to go to Heaven, but I am just saying that the concept of "freedom" is not so clear.
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
But, since Vyckro tries to make some points, and he doesn't consider everything to be useless, as I do, he keeps making videos, which are interesting to some, since he has 84 subscribers, and counting. In Romanian, his videos would have been more popular.
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
Mihaicosmos has a point, you don't need religion to get a job, you don't need for any practical purpose, actually, and yes, atheists read a lot, and take advantage of many things in this world, but that has nothing to do with spiritual evolution. It is hard for people which have everything in this world to get an impulse to search for a superior, or transcendental meaning, they live like very intelligent animals, and discussing with them is pointless.
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago 4
The small percentage of atheist in Romania is due to the fact that people are not outspoken and they still are afraid to say it!!
Wait some more years and you'll see. As kids are being educated better nowadays, the level of atheism will increase as well.
Your attack on her is cheap!!! Obviously she's an intelligent person and she does speak way better english than you!!!!!
mihaicosmos 2 years ago
about her English, she
receives help!
in reality she speaks so:
-->>/watch?v=x7h1uXS0AHw
About her education, she has no education, abaut the "intelligent person".
Why do you think is an intelligent person?
She has a film in which we can learn something?
VyckRo 2 years ago
well she does prepare hes videos but so do you and the difference is huge!!!
she has no education - how do you know?? why is this a relevant argument??? you think that you being a teacher makes you more respectable???? you must be kidding me!!!
Bare in mind that i never spoke with her. I just like her vids and dislike yours. Religion is stupid and you supporting it makes me sick.
mihaicosmos 2 years ago
I do not have anybody to help me with my video.
She has daily conferences BlogTV (
you know about the discrimination, against gypsies and atheisti in Romania).
The difference is huge, between her live and her on video.
You like her for the blonde woman that, she is.
There is no argument in her movies (maybe to hit the head with an icon is an argument for you)
VyckRo 2 years ago
Blonde is not enough to appreciate someone. I am not that superficial!!
Her vids resonate with my ideas that religion should be kept out of the public square.
I believe she is, like myself, for two main things :
1. Freedom FROM religion and
2. Freedom of religion
while you, from what I saw, are against the first point aren't you???
I don't deny the existance of a god, but for me any past and present religion is man-made as a result of the human superstition.
mihaicosmos 2 years ago
She is not for "Freedom. FROM. religion"
But against religion, her message is directed against people who subscribe to a religion.
She is against the people, and hates her own country
VyckRo 2 years ago
Religion should be something private between you and your god(whoever it might be)!!! but don't bring it into the public square like in romania and try to indoctrinate the young generation.
Nobody asks you about religion when going to get a job, but about informatics math and etc.... Don't see the point to teach it in schools! IQ and education level and religiosity are negatively correlated!! That should be a sign for you
mihaicosmos 2 years ago
Your information is wrong about Romania!
Our culture and history are closely tied our to religion.
You can see my video,
-->>/watch?v=_ACZ88bLa-Y
about this subject (and read the info to)
VyckRo 2 years ago
The Romanians have a right to be proud.
Why do you want to belong to that E.E.C. whore?
maatwerk67 2 years ago
e.e.c????
VyckRo 2 years ago
The Eurabian Economic Community.
maatwerk67 2 years ago
I do not want, no UE no EEC
In Romania UE, was imposed, no referendum, and people have been lied about UE.
The idea that should make part of such an organization is wrong.
VyckRo 2 years ago
Felicitari V pentru film si pentru faptul ca o ridiculizezi pe aceasta maimuta sociopata,bine i-ai zis :))O impostoare penibila care-si expune viata privata pe YT,incercand cu disperare sa iasa-n evidenta atacand exact cele mai sensibile puncte ale oamenilor,macar de ar face-o corect..sunt curioasa,oare despre Talmud sau despre ritualuri evreiesti,suprematia rasiala si ura impotriva a tot ce este ne-evreu,a vorbit vreodata?Majoritatea acestor circari "ateisti"care ataca crestinismul,sunt jidani!
shIomot 2 years ago
1da Cristina este ca un copil bolnav care loveste in propia mama, eu i-am trimis a doua zi dupa cea facut filmul cu arabi date despre circumcizie la evrei si cum au reusit sa impuna in america acest ritual ca politica medicala (la ei cand se naste un copil ii fac si circumcizie). I-am trimis asta pt ca era ingrijorata de femeile batute in islam. La evrei ritualul este oribil rabinbul isi foloseste gura si dinti.
I-am mai trimis si alte lucruri si ca urmare ca nu am lasat-o impace ....
VyckRo 2 years ago
Nu stiu despre ce film cu arabi de-al ei vorbesti,pt ca nu ma uit la porcariile ei,mi-a ajuns sa vad cateva,sa ma lamuresc,o impostoare,probabil platita de vreun ONG de-a lui Soros..n-ar fi singura,atat timp cat se prezinta ca ateista,dar nu e impariala si critica doar 2 religii la infinit,nimic despre evrei,e pe acelasi calapod cu ceilalti 2giboni!Eu cand am dat de ea,i-am scris pm civilizat in care o intrebam dc nu vorbeste si despre TALMUD/evrei si NU mi-a raspuns!RABINUL SUGE PUTZA DE SANGE!
shIomot 2 years ago
m-a amenintat la filmul
Re: My "relationship" with conflicts ( ZOMGitsCriss)
ca o sa faca un film despre Holocaust unde o sa spuna ca romani "au omorat cei mai multi evrei" banuiesc ca asta vorbeste de la sine.
VyckRo 2 years ago
MDA...e clar...oare de ce nu ma mir?
Impostorii astia sunt de-o nemernicie crasa...si ipocrizie mizerabila...de ce naiba nu recunosc ca ei sunt evrei si ca defapt ei nu cred in nimic dar ne urasc pe noi astia "creStini"-"muzzies"..stau cat e ziua de lunga pe YT,defapt pe tot netul,l-au umplut,batjocorind cu ironii de giboni circari gretosi credintele altora,vorbind cu o aroganta si cu o trufie penibila si libidinoasa despre obiceiurile si credintele UNORA(islamsicrestinism)NICIODATA DESPRE EVREI
shIomot 2 years ago
Uite cat de usor se joaca ei cu niste lucruri atat de importante cum ar fi holocaustul,cat de usor santajeaza ei in numele romanilor si Romaniei..se vede ca aceasta maimuta idioata,care se crede vreo vedeta pt ca are n maimutoi subscrisi la ea,adica un fel de rege peste prosti si retardati;o cretina cu gesturi copiate de la americani(yo yo ma'maan),cu mentalitate copiata de la cryptojidanul 'ateist' Pat Condom sau de la jidanul poponar grasul circar'aroganatheist',n-are nimic al ei,totul e copie
shIomot 2 years ago
voiam sa zic,se vede ca aceasta patachina idioata,care se prezinta cu mandrie ca o fata de pe centura(nu-i de mirare ca au sarit fraierii libidinosi,poate manca si gura lor ceva)nu e romanca,sau are in familie ex-comunisti-jidani-bolsevici,altfel ar fi suferit si ea in amintirea celor jertfiti de istorie,in amintirea celor care au facut posibil ca noi sa fim"aroganti"acum la pc si sa ne dam buricul pamantului,atotstiutori;nu ne putem batjocorii identitatea si istoria in halul asta si asa e varza
shIomot 2 years ago
da asta i-am zis si eu mie mi-a raspuns mult timp pana am acuzat-o ca este mincinoasa (si m-a blocat) cand intr-un film il acuza pe Base ca nu i-a acordat unui tanar dreptul la sinucidere si incearca sa spuna ce Base este un "fanatic religios."
Ea ataca religia pe model american si in acel film se chinuie sa scormoneasca niste cauze si pt Ro.
In discutile purtate cu ea mi-a fost clar. nu stie nimic desore Romania, doar "crimele inchizitiei" si "Hitler a fost crestin" este in capul ei
VyckRo 2 years ago
Tot ce pot sa spun despre zombi e ca minte cu nerusinare
GoodGuy4life199 2 years ago
yawn
tocs99 2 years ago
The 6 century AD is considered the time when the Romanian people finished forming, because the Romanian language was already cristalized, and the proto-Romanian from South of the Danube became Aromanian (with some Greek influence) and North of the Danube it became what is now called Daco-Romanian (with some Slavic words), basically the separation came after the Slavic migration. Anyway, my point is that what happened after the 6 century AD had a lot to do with Christianity.
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
*replaced by
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
In Romania we don't advertise everything, our culture was not replaced but United States cynicism and obsession for profit yet, not completely. See, Romania is between East and West from a spiritual point of view, the material world has no sense for us without a spiritual explanation, we believe in an objective, divine moral, not a man made opinion. We don't retreat from this world, but we need a deep meaning to it.
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
Okay, so Romania has an effective religious indoctrination program and a population that generally doesn't challenge their indoctrination.
I wouldn't want to advertise that VyckRo.
MrSonicAdvance 2 years ago 2
Romaniahas a culture, a culture based on Christianity, in comparison with others..
Although there are people who want to destroy our culture, and to bring as bugs bunny
VyckRo 2 years ago
Surely the Christian culture was once foreign to Romania? This is a foreign, immigrant religion which has usurped the original Romanian culture.
I would hope that what makes Romanian culture distinct to Romania is not Christianity, or any other religion.
Bugs Bunny isn't so bad, but not something to live your life by. ;-)
MrSonicAdvance 2 years ago
On Romania's territory Christianity imposed itself gradually, and in the Middle Ages, in villages, some Dacian rituals still existed, as pointed out by Mircea Eliade in his book "From Zamolxis to Genghis Khan". But since the Romanian people finished forming in the 6 century AD, we can say that a lot of its culture is connected with Christianity , and many saints and theologicians were born in Romania. I can maybe understand that being a Christian is hard to do for a genius,
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
but for an ordinary person, being a Christian is a very beneficial thing, especially in a country with a strong Christian tradition.
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
So who decided that the Romanian people finished forming in the 6th century? Did you close the boarders then and say: "Well everyone who's going to be a Romanian is now Romanian. We're done! The rest of the world are officially foreigners and will be recognised as such forever!" or what?
MrSonicAdvance 2 years ago 2
LOL i think you have some obsession about Criss.
pelisinho 2 years ago
he's secrety in love with her :)
georgebnet 2 years ago
how very interesting that you totally avoid commenting on zomgitscriss' reason for posting her video: it's not about "non-atheist" comments -you WERE trolling when you sent pms to her subscribers (a violation of §6E of youtube's terms of service, by the way).
using statistics that are seven years old provides a very weak argument. and constantly misrepresenting atheism as being the same as communism is intellectually dishonest.
your video is very, very weak indeed.
mbnp1701 2 years ago
Usca-mi-as sosetele pe crucea ma`tii. :)
JoanMichele 2 years ago
Religia ateista este o religie bazata pe ura. nu intamplator ati omarat peste 200 de milioane de oameni, Mai mult decar toate religiile la un loc.
VyckRo 2 years ago
Spala-te pe dinti ca vin cu pula in inspectie
JoanMichele 2 years ago
5/5 - Nice!
TheWillOfYahweh 2 years ago 3
Very good video, too bad you didn't have time for Michael the Brave or Stephen the Great and Holy, and also for Dimitrie Cantemir, Mihai Eminescu, Emil Racovita, George Enescu, Constantin Brancusi, Henri Coanda, Emil Palade, Nicolae Paulescu, Nicolae Teclu, Mircea Eliade, Emil Cioran, Lucian Blaga, Nichita Stanescu etc.
plyrgheorghe 2 years ago
And your point is? I'd like to see the source of this. And do you even know what a minority is? Clearly if atheists are of less numbers than religouse folk, they are a minority.
And even if Criss is wrong on one statment, why does that make her a lier about everything? and how does that make your god real above any other god?
Nightmare060 2 years ago
She does not tell the truth. She is incredible, perhaps, because she has forgotten how to do anything but speak lies on camera in her bedroom.
She is just a blonde liar who wants people to look at her as she deceives them. Shameful...a complete waste...also no historical, rhetorical, or artistic sense.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
sources from what? Tracian civilization? Roman civilization? The wars of Vlad Dracula?
VyckRo 2 years ago
Sources to show that romanian athiests are not a minority. And a minority, no matter how small, does not deserve to be treated as second class citizens.
Plus you still avoided compleatly her main argument which was concerning evidence for evolution. Which I can provide if need be, FYI.
Nightmare060 2 years ago
1 In my movie: "Facts and things I like (tag) - ZOMGitsCriss" Info -->Census Romania
2 The Ancient Church, has neither a textual nor a doctrinal basis to reject or approve evolutionism.
See: my movie:
"Re: My "relationship" with conflicts ( ZOMGitsCriss)" -->Info
VyckRo 2 years ago
1: I've seen that. Basicly, your whole argument against her consists of "NO U!". Plus, your source still shows romanian athiests ARE a minority because they are much lower in population than those of a religon. Again, no matter how small, that counts as a minority.
2: For a start, there is no such thing as "Evolutionism". Those that accept evolution except it under the basis of it being testable and provable, which it can and has been.
Nightmare060 2 years ago
"Those that accept evolution except it under the basis of it being testable and provable, which it can and has been."
Nop! is just the best theory at this moment.
You know what we need for the theory to be tested?
-the time machine
VyckRo 2 years ago
Atomic theory, Gravity, plate techtonics, germ theory. Those will NEVER become Laws or facts.
A theory is made up of large set of Facts laws observations, that has predictive and explanatory power and is very unlikely to change with new data. It is the Pinnacle of science.
Greathiway 2 years ago
if you do not believe in Gravity theory, Put a brick high above your head, and let the brick fall. :-)
VyckRo 2 years ago
I guess, english not being your first language and logic not being your best ability, greathiway's point just went over your head. very high over it.
well, no matter...
georgebnet 2 years ago
If you think "Gravity" is just a theory, Greathiway, why do you suppose it it called the LAW OF GRAVITY? It is a scientific FACT--unlike Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution, which remains nothing more than an ill-conceived, erroneous hypothesis. Evolution is false: that is why no one has proven it as a fact and no one ever will.
Darwin is a disgrace to the nautral sciences. His theory is bankrupt: collectively the human race ought to get over it like a bad case of Swine Flu.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
actually gravity is booth a theory and a fact and evolution is a theory and a fact
a scientific fact is a hypothesis that is so firmly supported by evidence that we assume it is true, and act as if it were true
a scientific theory is a well supported body of interconnected statements that explains observations and can be used to make testable predictions
perrson22 2 years ago
Not exactly, perrson22.
Your semantics are misleading: a fact remains a fact and cannot honestly be called a theory by anyone who already knows that the hypothesis (theory) has been PROVED.
As a matter of fact, the LAW OF GRAVITY may be utilized to support a new (or old) hypothesis, but it is dishonest doubletalk to call a PROVEN theory anything other than FACT.
Darwin's THEORY of evolution is a failed hypothesis. There is no evidence to prove it: it is NOT A FACT and never will be.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
theory does not mean the same thing as hypotheses i think you need to read a science book and i actually took my science book and directly put what it said on what those actually meant and there is so much evidence for evolution that anybody who actually knows the basics of dna should know there is evidence and theres also the fossil records if evolution were false they would not teach it as a fact im sure lots of people would love to prove creationism but they CANT sorry
perrson22 2 years ago
Don't be sorry, perrson22, the burden of proof remains on the heavy-laden backs of the Darwinist doubletalkers, one or two of whom probably wrote your science book.
Try reading a dictionary and a text on logic--if you know what that means. By the way, especially in terms of empirical research the words "theory" and "hypothesis" are often, perhaps usually, perfectly synonymous.
The "fossil records" are a canard: they have not established the descent of any new species from a different one.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
scientist must not be bias its one of the rules a scientist must fallow and what burden of proof if evidence for something were in size the evidence of evolution would be a large mountain in size the fossil record has transitional forms example: three toed horses to on toed horses. they did an experiment with some flies they put them in different glass containers and fed them two different kinds of food then they tested to see if they can mate but they couldn't they are now different species
perrson22 2 years ago
Too bad that "scientists" regularly ignore "the rules a scientist must fallow," persson22, especially when they happen to be rampantly biased Darwinists.
Worse still, they don't have the common sense or decency to write honest text books for children which would simply announce that they have fallen for Darwin's false premises and wasted their entire carreers to date.
Infertility doesn"t constitute OR PRODUCE ANY NEW SPECIES. I hope it won't waste your time further as Darwin's folly has.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
definition of species: a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding. The species is the principal natural taxonomic unit, ranking below a genus if two animals cant mate they are two different species and how can you take a proven fact and say its not true but you believe a book thousands of years old that says bats are birds is true if a scientist were to find actual proof that evolution were false he,d win the noble prize
perrson22 2 years ago
If you think that the existence of infertile specimens constitute evidence of new species, perrson22, take a walk down the street and find a woman over 70-years old. Then tell her that she is no longer a human being because she can't bear children any more.
Wake up. You won't win the Nobel Prize for using logic and common sense, and the Nobel committee doesn't have enough money to pay $1,000,000 to everyone who has already seen through a silly falsehood dubbed "scientific."
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
no a 70 year old woman is still a human the lady just cant produce egg cells because she just had some natural changes what happened with the flies that they separated the flies and while separated the flies still mated with their own group and the definition for species i got from the science book.
perrson22 2 years ago
I think you may be getting a little closer, perrson22, but you still miss the basic point.
Your science book uses misleading definitions of terms designed to confuse immature minds and provides goofy examples to support their intentionally obscurantist jargon. It boils down to a bunch of semantic boondoggles all of which dissolve under scrutiny.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
can u please provide some evidence that the science books are using misleading terms please because i also looked those terms in dictionaries its the same basic definition
perrson22 2 years ago
I have been doing that over and over again, perrson22.
Reread my replies to your comments.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
ovesly you dont know how evolution works here is an exaple: there is a blue box and you put some grey snails in it and some birds that eat snails some of the snails have a mutation and sometime that mutation is good making that snail less likely to be seen by the birds those snails are more likely to pass on there genes and eventually the snails are blue
perrson22 2 years ago
Wrong again, perrson22, and frankly I have forgotten more about Darwin's erroneous theory than you currently know or are ever likely to know.
A mutation only proves that a defective gene pattern occurred after mating in one resultutant specimen. Multiply that by a trillion and you get the same basic results: NO NEW SPECIES HAS EVER RESULTED FROM GENETIC MUTATIONS.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
they have seen good mutations in the wild and in the lab lots of times good mutations are just rare here is an example of a good mutation: bacteria are now immune to antibiotics some of the bacteria got that mutation and people who took the antibiotics killed off the ones that did not get the mutation
perrson22 2 years ago
It is unscientific to say "they have seen good mutations in the wild" or anywhere else, perrson22.
Valid genetic research has revealed significant information about recessive and dominant genes, but mutations are a dead end and no new species ever result from them.
Darwinism has retarded the growth of knowledge because misguided and unscrupulous men have conducted many expensive, inconclusive and insignificant experiments to support a bankrupt theory based on obviously false premises.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
if your soo sure your god made the earth please provide some proof i know all of the claims you said that evolution is lie is complete bullshit please explain why scientists would lie about that please explain why creationists have to lie to keep their claims yet you say their telling the truth and here is a example of a good mutation bacteria are now immune to antibiotics some of the bacteria got that mutation and people who took the antibiotics killed off the ones that did not get the mutation
perrson22 2 years ago
Why does anyone lie, perrson22?
Regardless of the reasons for falsehood, the reality of misformation and deception exists. The blind and indifferent acceptance of lies is commonplace in contemporary society. Therefore, if you like to believe what is false, you will have plenty of company.
Axioms are intuitively (innately) or logically obvious to man. Therefore, no "proof of God's existence" (e.g., an ontological argument) is ever necessary. Objections to axioms are insubstantial.
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
my exeptance of evolution is not blind there is lots of evidence but creationism is blind there is no evidence of it and if you think there is please provide the evidence science is not the practice of destroying religion science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment i got that definition in my dictionary god is not observable by science
perrson22 2 years ago
No kidding!
jjpetkusiii 2 years ago
That ending reminds me of that Yokeup Video with the can of lysol that got his account removed for hate speech.
NOT COOL!
Nothing new here just stalin was an athiest to therfore Atheist are Evil; BS.
gusb232 2 years ago
When atheist incite to religious hatred is all ok. But when someone laugh at atheist is not.
Atheist Free Speech = re free to say anything but not of atheist
In my house? at the work? on the street? =))
VyckRo 2 years ago
There is no such thing as Atheist free speech.
Free speech= the right of others to offend you.
You have not shown she is inciting violence.
Quite different from inciting hateful thoughts.
Why shouldn't we incite hate against those that preach hate?
I dont have some ancient book of Jewish stories that commands the genocide of those with opposing views on god.
gusb232 2 years ago
First problem, if the "ancient book of Jewish "is your problem, speaks with the Jew.
"You have not shown she is inciting violence"
Yes I did
--->>/watch?v=YXOuOga1110
Why shouldn't we incite hate against those that preach hate?
That mean the atheist No?
VyckRo 2 years ago
The purpose of this film is to show that she is telling lies
VyckRo 2 years ago
The only thing you managed to "prove" was that: 1) your idea of what the word "minority" represents differs from hers and the rest of the world and that 2) census data on atheists and agnostics (same shit, btw) is way below margin of error; congratz;
PS: the census lady in 2002 actively refused to mark the "atheist" checbox for my form, which was a huge abuse on her part. This has happened to a few of my friends too. That goes to show how reliable the census is.
georgebnet 2 years ago
Hebrew, Turkish, Bulgarian, Greek, Romania all have stories like these.
is a story about minority!
Toti si evrei, musulmani, satanistii, homosexuali, totiiii spun in soapta in realitate suntem mai multi, mult mai multi.
VyckRo 2 years ago
Liar.
I bet you married in an orthodox church or attained orthodox religious ceremonies.
You are not an atheist.
The lady with the census was right to not mark you as an atheist.
Mai potoliti-va odata cu minciunile astea. Tot ce faceti e sa calcati tara asta in picioare fara nici un motiv.
GoodGuy4life199 2 years ago
How presumptuous on your side, silly boy; For the record, the romanian part of "good" guy's message stated that we (atheists) are trampling this country (romania) with our lies;
I dont give a shit about you and your nationalism goodguy;
georgebnet 2 years ago
I guess this was the 'atheist' part of you speaking.
You are a phony. Not even a true atheist.
And if someone loves his country that's a good thing.
You don't give a shit about me because you hate everyone and everything, especially your country.
That's what I get from your comments
GoodGuy4life199 2 years ago
Si nu te-am atacat pentru lipsa ta de credinta, te-am atacat pentru ca ai mintit in legatura cu recensamantu.
Nu suntem o tara bananiera asa cum vrei tu sa o prezinti numai ca sa te simti bine cand iei parte la furat.
Inca mai sunt oameni buni in tara asta si nu o sa ne corupeti niciodata.
GoodGuy4life199 2 years ago
GoodGuy4life199, sunt total de acord cu tine,ne-am saturat de toti papitoii astia manipulati care manipuleaza la randul lor,sunt goi,fara suflet,doar carcasa si atat...constiinta si sufletul ti le da Dumnezeu,dar nu ti le da cu forta...asta e ceea ce nu inteleg ei...SUNT LIBERI SA ALEAGA...asta e frumusetea vietii...Dumnezeu ne iubeste,tocmai d-aia ne-a lasat LIBERTATEA...
Faptul ca ei sunt "aroganti" si "ironici" vis-a-vis de EL (asa cred ei) nu produc decat mila...sunt oameni chinuti si rai...
shIomot 2 years ago
Multumesc pentru incurajari.
GoodGuy4life199 2 years ago
Pt ei libertatea este "libertate" atata timp cat esti de partea lor.
Ateisti de pe YT isi impart voturile intre ei si se subscriu unul la altul.
Exact ca niste copii care se grupeaza pe bisericute. Eu pe de alta parte sunt liber sa fiu impotriva unui alt crestin/musulman/etc.
Ateismul asta a devenit o boala care se ia, si toti respecta cu sfintenie prima porunca Ataca cresini si musulmani pt crimele din vechiul testament dar niciodata pe cei ce l-au scris
VyckRo 2 years ago
Si se scire cu majuscule Romania
GoodGuy4life199 2 years ago 2
absolut fantastic video!!!!Salut Nationalist!!! Unde esti TU TEPES DOAMNE???
ps:VIVAT RAID!!!!
coslegionar 2 years ago
What can i say Vyckro, beautiful, just wonderful, i liked the part with the Turks, indeed, Vlad Tepes did what he had to do, too bad the Hungarians, (huns/2nd grade turks) killed him. But your people saved so much time for the rest of Europe to get ready, Romania was indeed the second gate after Constantinople !!!!!
I really enjoyed it, 5 stars and fav ofcourse ! Looking forward to see more, and ZOMGitsCriss, she want's to be a model, this is her way to get attention :)
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
Btw, not that i have some against Hungarians, but Atilla the Hun was a turk LOL.
They are also my Christian brother !!!
CreationistsWON 2 years ago
Great video and great points.
xychr0 2 years ago
With all that said it s posible that there are a lot of atheists that don't admit it.
greenelf12 2 years ago 2
Greattt video!!!! get that zomgits liar
vanityvideo 2 years ago 3
5*****
RoNatAndrei 2 years ago 3
Multam Frumos :-)
VyckRo 2 years ago