Y are all creationist hating, atheistic nerds British? I guess since religion has been all but wiped out in Britain they had to set sights on USA for the fourth British Invasion, if you will..
@legrandchien76 Because we never went through the perversion that was McCarthyism? Anyway, 10% of the US population is atheist without our help, so you really shouldn't blame it all on us. Perhaps 10% of your population just happens not to be an idiot that thinks a magic man done it.
@legrandchien76 Perhaps its that misery loves company and nerdy, godless Brits are jealous and upset over their own aesthetic unpleasantness. Cuz lets face it, Britain is collectively one of the homeliest nations on Earth. With the exception of Liz Hurley, Kate Moss and a couple of The Spice Girls.
it's alright, I'm sure no one in reality missed you while you watched the video.
"If I were an Evolutionist"
Corrected: "If I had the cognitive ability to understand evolution I wouldn't be complaining about a simple yet funny video on the absurdity of creationist 'theory'."
Some evidence is obvious intellectual stuff such as the the universe itself being created from nothingness, the infinitesimal mathematical probability of the laws of physics being set during the Big Bang to allow life to exist, the life of the historical Jesus as recorded by first century biographers, and the God impulse that's implanted in every human being. The most compelling evidence is the personal connection many Christians have made with God..but that's for us to know and you to find out.
you are right somuchfortalent. Just that what you are talking about is one of the reasons why science thinks about multiverses and oscilating universes.
If the universe is incabable of producing life, no life will ever exist to notice it. only if the conditions are right, life will evolve.
it would be a lot more unlikely, if the conditions weren't that perfect. Life in a universe that does not support life, would be an indication for a god. not otherwise.
@atheistfriends A bunch of people making a 'personal connection with God' does not constitute evidence, and you don't know it, so there's nothing to 'find out'.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Im very glad and thankful to lord that my children are being taught by the Bible WHICH IS THE ONLY TRUTH!!! Not the muslims, not the jews, definitely not the NON BELIEVERS!!! Jesus is your saviour ACCEPT HIS GIFT OR PERISH IN HELL!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is ridiculeus!!! You saying our AND YOUR lord jesus christ did not sacrifice HIMSELF in the Golgata for YOUR LIFE!! BE THANKFUL TO LORD, THE evolution theory is ONLY A THEORY!!! Everyone knows there are millions of theories and maybe, maybe 100 of them are later facts! So what MAKES YOU BELIEVE THAT the men of spirit, for thousands of years have not got the SACRED MESSAGE but were liers!!???
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
FYI - No one was there is the beginning therefore we can only look at the scientific evidence and draw conclusions. Where did all the stuff come from? Why hasn't the universe reached entropy? Please explain abiogenesis? Sorry I just don't have that much faith to be an evolutionist. Try using facts instead of comedy.
"No one was there is the beginning" therefore magic man done it.
"Where did all the stuff come from?" Magic man done it.
"Please explain abiogenesis?" This has nothing to do with Evolution. And as there's currently no comprehensive explanation it's unfair to ask the scientific illiterates of YT.
"Sorry I just don't have that much faith to be an evolutionist" But you have plenty of faith to believe in magic men? Also, you don't require faith to accept evolution. That's why there's evidence
Actually if you have been following the I.D. and creationist conspiracy closely enough you will find that they (the creationist) did essentially that.
The John's gospel's saying that all things were created through Jesus is a confssion by the John's gospel writer. Not that Jesus said himself 'I made everything' Jesus never said anything like that. Point is, bible should be interpreted, I can quote from the bible and say to you that Jesus isn't a God because it says so in the Bible, "who do you call me good? only God alone is good'...
nope, you're wrong. The Flying Spaghetti Monster did it. The Gospel of the FSM CLEARLY states that all things were created by the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Much more important is that gravity is 'just a THEORY', and that the reason we're all not floating up into space is because the FSM is pushing us down with this noodly appendages.
DATCMOTO, are you being sarcastic, or what? Do you really believe in the bible? It's just a book, read it more carefully. ITS JUST A BOOK. A book filled with morals, not history, not fact, MORALS. The one and only reason for religion is teaching morals to people. Heaven and hell are opium for the people, like Marx said. The concept of heaven/hell was created to oblige people to follow the morals written in the holy books (bible, thora, koran,...). Well that's my opinion on religion, what's yours
Not even great morals....I mean theres the "dont kill or steal" part but then it contradicts those rules with savage she-bears sent by god....leveling entire cities based on the fact that lots of people there liked butt sex, a god-sent worldwide flood that killed everything but 5 or so people, who then repopulated the earth through incest (remember this is the second time incest was used to repopulated the earth)
Brilliant video. I feel so sorry for drakeblackhorn who wasted all that energy trying to explain something rationally to someone who was wilfully blind!
It wasn't Haruhi, but it wasn't the flying spaghetti monster either. It was the Spaghetti/Haruihi/Monster/I-have-no-life-to-the-point-where-I-use-easily-thought-up-jokes-that-a-toddler-can-think-up Magic Man
Do us all a favor and never open your mouth about evolution ever again. Actually he made you assholes look better because you have done FAR WORSE than what was represented.
science is a beautiful thing,nature is a beautiful thing,man is the height of Gods wonder in this world,in his image we were made,it really is that simple,laws rule this universe from the law of gravity to the laws of nature,to the law of love,the 10 commandments,nice an simple
just about every bit of scientific knowledge is based around evolution,even my good mate wikipedia,annoys the friggen hell outta me,its deceptive,wrong, and misleading,how its made ground in some churches is beyond me,the 2 cannot be shared for God is the death of evolution and vice versa,but even worse they label it science,like religion,evolution has its followers,therefore should be classed as a religion
evolution is science, and the unifying theory in biology. if not for evolution, biology would be nothing but trivia. also, modern medicine is relying more on evolution theory.
some churches are simply accepting the scientific truth, and no longer clinging to bronze-age (or older) myths. evolution says nothing about a god at all.
i believe the population levels we have now and the associated history fit the biblical timeframe,the expansion of mankind from his beginings in mesopotamia,mans "Cradle of civilization"or so refered to as"land between the two rivers"LOL i feel like some professor with this wikipedia
how is it that the eye seems to work in the same way in us as it does with animals and insects?how is it that evolution has evolved exactly the same principle for sight in just about all creatures?conicidence?or a design standard that has been employed in a variety of ways to suit?
the different eyes we see didn't evolve all on their own. they are all descended from light-sensitive cells, the photocells i mentioned before. as life branched out, so did eyes.
a bit of an eye is better than none at all, and eyes became more sophisticated as 'add-ons' improved them.
the fact that the eye works in basically the same fashion in humans as it would in insects, and that is by detecting light, indicates that evolution has a incredible capacity for good ole luck and coincidence thats its just not funny,even the eyes of a snail as basic as they are, employ the same fuction,to detect light
Eyes are organs that detect light. Different kinds of light-sensitive organs are found in a variety of animals, the eye works by allowing light to enter it and project onto a light-sensitive panel of cells, known as the retina, at the rear of the eye. The cone cells (for color) and the rod cells (for low-light contrasts) in the retina detect and convert light into neural signals. The visual signals are then transmitted to the brain via the optic nerve.
where is the history and population levels to give with the vast time spans given for mans existance in his current form?if evolution is an undeniable,scientifically proven fact then this should be quite an easy question for u Vaststrike,just bear in mind,there a 6.5 billion people alive today,and there were only 200 million 1AD,and the oldest civilization is aincent sumer,between 4000-3000 BC
human population growth was a lot slower in ancient history, and during prehistoric times, due to lower technology. i'm just saying this because you seem to think population's an issue somehow.
why do you think we need populations and other info from prehistoric times to prove evolution? before writing, history was kept by storytellers. much of this became the myths we see today. hunter-gatherers just didn't have any need for detailed, accurate histories, so much of pre-writing history is lost.
yes human population growth was slower,only because the total population was smaller,as each year goes by the growth increases,growth of a population will run hand in hand with timespan,general knowledge in this area has been documented and tampered i believe to fit the evolutionary timescale,especially in the time 1AD to 70,000 BC,from 1AD to 2008 this area is free of such adjustments because of census taking that started during the reign of ceasar,thus the results cannot be doctored
"...tampered i believe to fit the evolutionary timescale..."
don't even start with that conspiracy theory crap. i won't put up with it. if you start claiming that any information put out by someone that argues against your point is fabricated, then there's absolutely no point in discussing the matter with you.
as for proving evolution from population levels or history,it cant be done,but thats not my point,my point is that there is no population levels or history to go with the time spans 70,000 BC 1 AD,have a look at the world now,have a look as little as a 1000 yrs ago and see where man is,the then known world has shrunk quite dramatically,wheres america,or australia?go back another 1000 yrs and the then known world is only a quater of wat it is now
i assume you're going off a faulty timescale, which ignores many factors.
now, before the days of sophisticated technology, we were hunter-gatherers, living poor lives. many died young, many mothers died in childbirth, and many died hunting or in accidents. new factors, like medicine and farming, increased survival and spurred population growth by a significant factor. farming and medicine have improved greatly, spurring growth on even more. that is exactly why your population idea is faulty.
im using the wikipedia timescale,its a evolution timescale,they were farming in Sumer,mesopotamia,history speaks of wars and famines,plagues,if you think medicine or hunting accidents or even childbirth slowed them down,well i hate to disappoint you cause those things still happen today,a vast share of the worlds population are still 3rd world conditions
is the vast majority of mankind still wearing animal skins and following herds of animals? no. farming had the biggest impact on population growth, but medicine has contributed greatly. even a 3rd world nation today is much better than those primitive days before farming, and will show a vast difference in child survival and population growth.
i saw something about this once. i believe they started farming due to increasing arid conditions, and civilization grew from there. they herded animals as well as farming. not sure when crops for clothing materials started. but clothing was made from animal hair at a pretty early time, i think.
the hunter-gatherers wore skins from their kills. i'm sure it continued for quite a while after the beginning of farming and herding, until they had enough free time to experiment.
sliew72 I understand you don't like the theory of evolution; however, that doesn't change that evolution happened. Your denial of evolution is reminiscent of holocaust denial. The evidence for evolution has been compiled for over 150 years and the theory stands. That is about as sound a theory as you can have in science. I don't see you fighting cell theory, the theory of gravitation, the theory of relativity, germ theory or any of the other theories that help you on a daily basis.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
theres no denying the holocaust,theres no denying if you jump off a 10 storey building your gonna get hurt,theres no denying mans abilities to see microscopic organisms,cells and germs,or his knowledge of stars,or that things fact that there were huge creatures that once walked this earth,evolution cannot be placed in the same light as these,even the theory of relativity is based upon observance,something i think evolution will have a hard time in proving
And just like that you are wrong. People do deny the holocaust they call it "holocaust denial". I am not the first to make the comparison. Also evolution has been observed. Evolution is the fundamental principle of biology and is just as useful if not more useful than the theory of relativity. In other words you're wrong. If you don't like it I suggest you just get over it. I don't wish to be rude but sometimes the truth hurts. Also you don't "prove" theories in science.
rude?your too nice to be rude,truthfully,lol.People believe wat they want concerning the holocaust,my point is that such a thing happened,a historical fact,its in the movies ,the books,the people who lived thru it,some r still alive today,in other words,"theres no denying the holocaust"
For some reason youtube won't let me post the link for you. So just go to wiki and type in Holocaust denial. You will find plenty of info there. I have met people that deny evolution, the moon landing, and even the Holocaust but never someone who denies Holocaust denial.
look at indias masses,look at the millions from africa,the arabic and asiatic races,notice also that these countries with the highest population levels in the world are also nearest to the "Cradle of civilization"
mankind evolved in africa, spread from there, and 3rd world nations, preindustrial nations, tend to have a higher birth rate than developed nations. medicine, though primitive in a lot of these areas, is still better than nothing, as the hunter-gatherers lived.
also, don't forget most westerners are immigrants. more people would stay home rather than immigrate.
no, i didn't contradict myself. just look at the post "mankind evolved in africa", if you haven't yet. and don't forget that population growth slows in postindustrial times.
could you start digging beyond the surface with your information? stop throwing information at me that just seems to support your beliefs. it's been ridiculously easy to break them down, simply by finding the rest of the story.
you broke them down by finding the rest of the story?how does the rest of the story go?is that the one with mankind originating in africa over 7 million yrs ago?lol,yea you got me there,lets be honest here you contradicted yourself previously,why you think a paleoanthropologists account on where life came from based findings of apelike bones and fossils is gonna convince me is puzzling,you have yet to account for man in his current form combined with a 70,000 yr history
the stories behind your facts, the additional information.
how exactly did i contradict myself?
the overall story of the human race is longer than 70,000 years, by the way. they've found fossil homo sapiens estimated at around 195,000 years. i spoke about the history issue. prehistoric humans didn't keep detailed histories.
-shrugs- fossils of human ancestors are there, and have been well-studied. but, of course, you reject transitional fossils, right? on what grounds, i'm curious.
if i didnt reject transitional fossils i would be a evolutionist,or do you need a more indepth explanation?as for contradicting yourself,take your own advice and read the posts and far as im concerned 70,000 yrs wasnt enough for you huh,now humans have been around 195,000 yrs,there wouldnt be enough room on this planet for a population of 70,000 yrs let alone a 195,000 figure
so, you're still ignoring the factors of farming and medicine, as if they had nothing to do with population growth whatsoever.
know what, i'm done here. you've ignored everything i've told you, or dismissed it out of hand, and continued with the same blatant logical fallacies.
i don't know why i keep letting myself get dragged into scientific arguments with the scientifically ignorant. probably the hope i'll find someone who's simply ignorant, and not willfully ignorant.
im actually flattered to think that im having a scientific argument with you ,lol,but your right i am scientifically deficient in matters concerning evolution,but why would i need to know if i think the principles are wrong to begin with anyway,not to mention its most obvious fault that seems to defy logic,history and even common sense,
if you never learn about something, how can you learn if you're wrong? and i used the word scientific loosely. it was a bit one-sided.
have you not payed attention to a single damn thing i've said?! we don't think humans were too dumb to start farming sooner. they were forced to start farming by conditions that made the hunter-gatherer life untenable. remember, the growing arid conditions?
that is what i call willful ignorance, and that's why i have such a poor opinion of creationists.
if im guilty of willful ignorance then your guilty of stupidity,lack of commonsense,lack of logic,and a willingness to follow blindly the opinions of your peers and believe without question there views on worldly origins,some clown picks up a bone and says its 80 million yrs old you all agree,and YOU have a poor opinion of creationists
by the way ive paid close attention to everything youve said,we seem to backtracking over this farming issue,you originally bought this point up to explain the population increase when i mentioned the different rates between BC 2000 to 1 AD and 1 AD to 2005,but we both know farming has been around way before then.What got them started farming,arid conditions?hunter life untenable?who knows for sure,one things for sure and that is they were farming
yes i agree farming and medicine will aid the growth,as ive said before farming has been around a long time since mesopotamia,thats roughly 4000 BC,for some reason evolutionists seem to think people were to dumb back then to look after themselves
by the way where r these transitional fossils?you know the phrase "missing link" should be rephrased "missing links"cause if your gonna show me transitional fossils,then you have to provide transsitional fossils for everything,plants,man,beast,whatever,good luck and happy hunting
I'm with you DrakeBlackHorn. As a great secular humanist once said "everyone's an atheist of something. There's been so many gods in so many cultures. We just go one god further."
Evolution is an undeniable, scientifically provable fact. Get over it Sliew72 - and learn how to spell.
drakeblackhorn i dont know why u say i keep posting my comments sepaparately,what do u mean?how can you lose track,theres only u and me posting here,and i dont know wat u mean by strawman and i thought i had brought up a good point with my strongest argument,apparently not,
are you pressing "reply" on my comments, or posting in the box at the bottom of the screen? because i haven't received reply emails, and your comments are not attached to mine on the screen. i have to keep checking the video to see if you've replied.
a strawman is when you misrepresent an opponent's argument or standpoint, replacing it with a weaker version, and defeat the weaker version, then pretend you defeated the real argument.
ah i c,didnt realise this would send an email and post here at the same time,and thx you for taking the time to explain the strawman meaning,now that i know wat u mean i suppose the ferrai does come across that way,well then lets look at humans and see if i can see signs of manufacture
what would you consider signs of manufacture? what comes to mind for me are nuts and bolts/screws, welds, and tool marks. and, of course, the known presence of the builder.
humans have things that are similar and common in the natural world of animals and insects,for instance eyes,all eyes are not the same,for example a cat,or even a owl,they see better than us at night,or a eagle has really good eyesight to spot out its prey from high up,whatever animal or insect it may be a similar design is found in the way sight works
eyes are an excellent survival trait, so in evolution, you would expect those that gained eyes to take off, and eyes would become the norm. with evolution, you would also expect a great deal of variation in the eye.
you can actually take evolutionary models for the eye, from photocell to human eye, and find living examples of most steps in nature.
now, why are humans so similar to other vertebrate life? the answer seems obvious to me. common descent, supported by various types of evidence.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you wanna know why i call it magic?the reasons are many,let me give you what i feel is my strongest argument against evolution,where is the history and population levels to give with the vast time spans given for mans existance in his current form?
you think that because scientists can't give exact detail, then the whole thing's wrong? that's a ridiculous demand, which suggests you'll never have 'enough evidence' to accept it.
the scientific community, as i said before, has already gathered enough evidence to conclude that evolutionary theory is sound. and the existence of the evolution process is no longer debated at all, only details! evolution is a known process. evolution theories explain it, and take it further.
look drakeblackhorn,i think its a real pain in the butt to find the comment that you replied to and reply back,if you wanna know wat ive said jump on and check, i think thats better than getting a heap emails, as im very interested in the topic i plan to be around to make evolutionists see the light
i've 'seen the light'. i was raised christian, and left because i started reading the bible. i didn't even get deep into science until after i'd left.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
by the way, why are you posting your comments separate from mine? do you not want me to know you're responding?...... lol yea im scared your gonna make me into a evolutionists...wats there to be scared of?wat have you said to me thats scary,.lol
so, if you're not scared, then why are you posting them separate? i didn't actually say you were scared, by the way. i was thinking it's more likely you wanted me to lose track, so it'd look like you were unchallenged. it's happened to me many times, so it's a reasonable thought.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wat was so ridiculous about the ferrari example?its a logical example that you cant get around except to say im illlerate in science,that if i knew evolutions finer points and have studied and learnt the other factors of evolution that i wouldnt be saying wat im saying,that i wouldnt be ignorant...lol
a ferrari is a machine. it does not reproduce, does not mutate, is not affected by selection or environmental pressures, and shows obvious signs of manufacture. we know for a fact it was built, and can see those who built it.
comparing it to living things is nothing but a weak strawman.
you know what? unless you bring up a real point in your next slew of comments, i'm not going to bother with you anymore. you'll also have to show you actually do understand at least the basics of evolution.
just because i dont know the inbetweens of evolution doesnt mean i dont know wat evolutions about,even my kid can tell me the basics of evolution,at which point i start from in evolution makes no difference,whether it be from the monkeys or amino acids or from something even simpler,the end results are the same
when water vapor first liquefied,[2] and 2.7 billion years ago, when the ratio of stable isotopes of carbon (12C and 13C), iron (56Fe, 57Fe, and 58Fe) and sulfur (32S, 33S, 34S, and 36S) points to a biogenic origin of minerals and sediments[3][4] and molecular biomarkers indicate photosynthesis.[5][6] This topic also includes panspermia and other exogenic theories regarding possible extra-planetary or extraterrestrial origins of life.[7]
In the natural sciences, abiogenesis, the question of the origin of life, is the study of how life on Earth emerged from non-life. Scientific consensus is that abiogenesis occurred sometime between 4.4 billion years ago
and if you do know about evolution, and have studied it using reliable sources, you will know about the great amount of evidence that has been gathered. for the scientific community, it is quite incontrovertible with the current evidence.
you give a scanty description, leaving out substance and detail, that itself nearly forms a strawman argument. you do know about abiogenesis, right? evolution only starts with the first primitive structures that could possibly be called 'life'.
i do know about evolution,i was taught it in school,you see it on tv,cable internet,libraries have hundreds of books on them,everyone knows about evolution,wats so hard about knowing we all came from amino acids that eventually became us
you haven't shown any working knowledge, and i've only seen people who were scientifically illiterate say the ridiculous things you have.
"...oh look a evolved ferrari...", "...4 billion yrs from amino acid to man aint magic?", and "...put together by chance..." point towards ignorance concerning evolution.
abiogenesis begins with even simpler things than amino acids, just so you know.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
when you see a ferrari driving past u dont say "oh look a evolved ferrari",yet humans are the most complex things on earth and weve been put together by chance,my ass,wats the chances of a ferrari being put together by chance?,and u evolutionists have the nerve to call this logical,aint nuthun logical about it at all,illogical is more like it
not, funny.
MassFragment 1 year ago
@MassFragment Then why comment? Go watch some power ranger videos, or go eat a happy meal.
Harrymfink 1 year ago
"a forcy-force force" lol
sailorstarrr 1 year ago
brilliant!
TheHomelessCripple 1 year ago
The only reason i watched this till the end is because of the accordion and the retard waving hands.
xinjinbei 1 year ago
Y are all creationist hating, atheistic nerds British? I guess since religion has been all but wiped out in Britain they had to set sights on USA for the fourth British Invasion, if you will..
legrandchien76 1 year ago
@legrandchien76 Because we never went through the perversion that was McCarthyism? Anyway, 10% of the US population is atheist without our help, so you really shouldn't blame it all on us. Perhaps 10% of your population just happens not to be an idiot that thinks a magic man done it.
CrixMakin 1 year ago
@legrandchien76 Perhaps its that misery loves company and nerdy, godless Brits are jealous and upset over their own aesthetic unpleasantness. Cuz lets face it, Britain is collectively one of the homeliest nations on Earth. With the exception of Liz Hurley, Kate Moss and a couple of The Spice Girls.
legrandchien76 1 year ago
@legrandchien76
Hang on, 4th British invasion?
I don't think they've even invaded once.
lifescomicrelief 1 year ago
hahaha! brilliant!
arash3589 1 year ago
I think the accordion is definitely a neccesity when trying to make creationists look like fools.
FullyDeconverted 1 year ago 4
jeffhobson : I'm glad I wasted your time. My objective has been reached.
tehcovmeme 2 years ago
@tehcovmeme Well you didn´t waste MY time, have aching jawhinges from smirking like a maniac the whole time and even harder at jeffhobsons comment.
Thanks for sharing the laugh with us. ;)
martialme84 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I just wasted 3:22 of my life on watching this video. If I were an Evolutionist, I'd be pissed.
jeffhobson 2 years ago
lol. Well, I AM an "evolutionist." I'm not the least bit pissed. In fact, I thought it was kinda humerous.
Ripley747 2 years ago 3
@jeffhobson
it's alright, I'm sure no one in reality missed you while you watched the video.
"If I were an Evolutionist"
Corrected: "If I had the cognitive ability to understand evolution I wouldn't be complaining about a simple yet funny video on the absurdity of creationist 'theory'."
somuchfortalent 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I just wasted 3:22 of my life watching this video. If I were an Evolutionist, I'd be pissed.
jeffhobson 2 years ago
Some evidence is obvious intellectual stuff such as the the universe itself being created from nothingness, the infinitesimal mathematical probability of the laws of physics being set during the Big Bang to allow life to exist, the life of the historical Jesus as recorded by first century biographers, and the God impulse that's implanted in every human being. The most compelling evidence is the personal connection many Christians have made with God..but that's for us to know and you to find out.
atheistfriends 2 years ago
@atheistfriends
"the infinitesimal mathematical probability of the laws of physics being set during the Big Bang to allow life to exist,"
The mathematical odds of the universe existing in it's current state are exactly the same as it existing in another different form.
If I tell you to pick a number between 1 and 1000, the odds of you picking the number 4 are 1 in 1000. The odds of you picking 22 are still 1 in 1000.
You don't know that there wouldn't be life in another type of universe.
somuchfortalent 2 years ago 4
you are right somuchfortalent. Just that what you are talking about is one of the reasons why science thinks about multiverses and oscilating universes.
If the universe is incabable of producing life, no life will ever exist to notice it. only if the conditions are right, life will evolve.
it would be a lot more unlikely, if the conditions weren't that perfect. Life in a universe that does not support life, would be an indication for a god. not otherwise.
liquidminds 1 year ago 2
@atheistfriends A bunch of people making a 'personal connection with God' does not constitute evidence, and you don't know it, so there's nothing to 'find out'.
MusicOfTheSpheres57 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sick of Christians and Atheists arguing?
atheistfriends 2 years ago
Forcy force, pushy kinda force..
Lars0n 2 years ago 6
the last seconds are awesome
friguido 2 years ago 4
Magic man done it! Hahaha. Fucking creationists.
Lars0n 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Im very glad and thankful to lord that my children are being taught by the Bible WHICH IS THE ONLY TRUTH!!! Not the muslims, not the jews, definitely not the NON BELIEVERS!!! Jesus is your saviour ACCEPT HIS GIFT OR PERISH IN HELL!
malieh 2 years ago
please shut the fuck up
lateralexrex 2 years ago
The sad thing is that you do not realise how blind you are to the real truth. The one with tangible evidence to back it up.
RetepNamenots 2 years ago
"Believe or BURRRRRRRRRRRN!!!!!!11111two111"-typical reply from an unthinking-fundamentalist. I take it you too were indoctrinated as well?
Also, you strike me as a troll. Lol.
Zero4Mars 2 years ago 3
Jag trodde anglarna fanns bara, bara i himmelen
Jag trodde anglarna fanns bara, bara i himmelen..
Men det var innan jag møtte deg! Nu har jag en angal her hos mig..
PointIessVideos4Life 2 years ago
You're an idiot
Lars0n 2 years ago 3
@malieh Yeah OK.
MusicOfTheSpheres57 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is ridiculeus!!! You saying our AND YOUR lord jesus christ did not sacrifice HIMSELF in the Golgata for YOUR LIFE!! BE THANKFUL TO LORD, THE evolution theory is ONLY A THEORY!!! Everyone knows there are millions of theories and maybe, maybe 100 of them are later facts! So what MAKES YOU BELIEVE THAT the men of spirit, for thousands of years have not got the SACRED MESSAGE but were liers!!???
malieh 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FYI - No one was there is the beginning therefore we can only look at the scientific evidence and draw conclusions. Where did all the stuff come from? Why hasn't the universe reached entropy? Please explain abiogenesis? Sorry I just don't have that much faith to be an evolutionist. Try using facts instead of comedy.
mkak1000 2 years ago
"No one was there is the beginning" therefore magic man done it.
"Where did all the stuff come from?" Magic man done it.
"Please explain abiogenesis?" This has nothing to do with Evolution. And as there's currently no comprehensive explanation it's unfair to ask the scientific illiterates of YT.
"Sorry I just don't have that much faith to be an evolutionist" But you have plenty of faith to believe in magic men? Also, you don't require faith to accept evolution. That's why there's evidence
Spoonfoon 2 years ago 26
"Sorry I just don't have that much faith to be an evolutionist."
And I don't have enough stupidity to be a creationist.
fundiebasher 2 years ago 12
@mkak1000
"Sorry I just don't have that much faith to be an evolutionist."
Sorry I just don't have that much faith to believe........ A magic man done it !
bdobbsthepipe 1 year ago
@mkak1000 'Don't have that much faith to be an evolutionist'? ahahahahahahaha!!!! You don't have that much brains to be an evolutionist!
MusicOfTheSpheres57 1 year ago 2
The bloke doing the hand movements is real quality. Best video on YT
HURUHRA 2 years ago 3
I'm not even finished with it but it got my 5 stars already!
"and the creationist went 'alright...erm..it was quite good, that'..."
Classic
tommytalks77 2 years ago
i dont believe in creationism at all, but this isn't very funny
darkwingduck3211 2 years ago
Actually if you have been following the I.D. and creationist conspiracy closely enough you will find that they (the creationist) did essentially that.
Seeker64 2 years ago 3
You have to admit this is very clever though.
mar8les 2 years ago
true say, just not funny
darkwingduck3211 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A magic man DID do it!
Johns Gospel CLEARLY states that ALL thing's were created through Jesus Christ..
MUCH more important is that ALL thing's are being completed in Him..
He's coming back guys...
YOU ready?
DATCMOTO 2 years ago
In order to come back he/she/it had to have first been here. No evidence of that.
fundiebasher 2 years ago 6
Lord of the Rings CLEARLY states Hobbits, Elves, Dwarves, and Orcs exist.
Faustuss1 2 years ago 24
The John's gospel's saying that all things were created through Jesus is a confssion by the John's gospel writer. Not that Jesus said himself 'I made everything' Jesus never said anything like that. Point is, bible should be interpreted, I can quote from the bible and say to you that Jesus isn't a God because it says so in the Bible, "who do you call me good? only God alone is good'...
koreasoulja 2 years ago
nope, you're wrong. The Flying Spaghetti Monster did it. The Gospel of the FSM CLEARLY states that all things were created by the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Much more important is that gravity is 'just a THEORY', and that the reason we're all not floating up into space is because the FSM is pushing us down with this noodly appendages.
Praise be to the FSM.
Ramen
simsi1616 2 years ago 9
RAmen brother.
PAKMAN52 2 years ago 5
I hope she makes lotsa spagaetti
akumaten 2 years ago 3
DATCMOTO, are you being sarcastic, or what? Do you really believe in the bible? It's just a book, read it more carefully. ITS JUST A BOOK. A book filled with morals, not history, not fact, MORALS. The one and only reason for religion is teaching morals to people. Heaven and hell are opium for the people, like Marx said. The concept of heaven/hell was created to oblige people to follow the morals written in the holy books (bible, thora, koran,...). Well that's my opinion on religion, what's yours
landerfrederickx 2 years ago
Not even great morals....I mean theres the "dont kill or steal" part but then it contradicts those rules with savage she-bears sent by god....leveling entire cities based on the fact that lots of people there liked butt sex, a god-sent worldwide flood that killed everything but 5 or so people, who then repopulated the earth through incest (remember this is the second time incest was used to repopulated the earth)
seifer234 2 years ago 6
id go on but im basically just trying to say the bible isnt a book of morals, its a book written by ignorant sheep herders
seifer234 2 years ago 11
Brilliant video. I feel so sorry for drakeblackhorn who wasted all that energy trying to explain something rationally to someone who was wilfully blind!
GoodniteGirl 2 years ago
That magic man wasn't god or jesus, it was the flying spaghetti monster.
LordPanties 2 years ago 6
No way! It was Haruhi!
faarsight 2 years ago
It wasn't Haruhi, but it wasn't the flying spaghetti monster either. It was the Spaghetti/Haruihi/Monster/I-have-no-life-to-the-point-where-I-use-easily-thought-up-jokes-that-a-toddler-can-think-up Magic Man
LordPanties 2 years ago
I quote from the holy sayings of Haruhinism:
Haruhinism, our God is Hotter than YOUR God.
faarsight 2 years ago
Jesus that was funny. Thanks so much!
resurgam44 2 years ago 2
"Magic Man done it!" ha ha ha!
"A bangy force" ha ha ha!
GuerrillaAtheism 2 years ago 3
Freaking hilarious! :)
subnetme 2 years ago 2
LOL
As the Jedi master Obi-Wan Kenobi turns to Luke and says to him, "Luke let the force be with you...feel the force Luke."
Aegialeus 2 years ago
The title of this video is an oxymoron.
ftwsmp 3 years ago 12
lol
yahyahtoopy 2 years ago
ahahahhahahahahahhahahahahha,GREAT..u r great man..i laughed as crazy madafaka
moskri013 3 years ago
You stopped it before the punchline...gah
DeeperRootsProject 3 years ago
HILARIOUS!
ChariotRider 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this video promote anti islam ! this is unislamic
samgee2007 3 years ago
No its anti ZEUS ,Horus and all the others video.
resistanceunion 3 years ago 6
You're just upset because your religion didn't really know how life got here and how the world was made.
bebop7c2 3 years ago
jep
Zuurkool1 2 years ago
Robin Ince is brilliant! Why can't some of you people see?
stevenuuu1212 3 years ago
Brilliant!!!
SilverAffection 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this video is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooo stupid....too bad ID is science.
evolutionisforetards 3 years ago
you are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo stupid.........tragic...
raoskaos 3 years ago 6
Read definition science retard.
resistanceunion 3 years ago
successful troll is successful
ChariotRider 3 years ago
haha you have the best name ever, idiot
Zuurkool1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this video is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo stupid....too bad ID is science.
evolutionisforetards 3 years ago
too bad it isn't :-P
"Magic man done it"... yep, sums up the stupid argument from ignorance quite well.
arshsingh1984 3 years ago 5
Instant favourite. Let's fight to remove all creationists from our schools and save science!
GSioufi 3 years ago
That was very funny. Good job Robin.
nintendopi 3 years ago
jolly good job
DrBojangles88 3 years ago
lol
B2KIrishk9 3 years ago
fucking creationist cunts.
Tradd9 3 years ago 3
Why does this clip garner such spite?
It 'hit's the nerve'...
0lord0kinbote0 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
because it's such poor representation of the ID movement. Besides, robin ince a such a fuck wad.
evolutionisforetards 3 years ago
so it's because he is right.
0lord0kinbote0 3 years ago 2
right about being a fuck wad...yes.
CONservativeMenace 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Robin ince is not a scientist. He's a goofy comic with a bone up his ass about how evolution is losing steam..finally.
pranksteeeer 3 years ago
haha how can a fact lose steam?
m0osey 3 years ago
Do us all a favor and never open your mouth about evolution ever again. Actually he made you assholes look better because you have done FAR WORSE than what was represented.
GSioufi 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Do us all a favor and never let your mother open her pussy again. Yes I typed: "your mother's pussy" do me a favor and slit your throat and die.
evolutionisforetards 3 years ago
What a lovely christian comment. Your parents must be so proud.
fundiebasher 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my parents are Muslims...yours must be chid molesters.
evolutionisforetards 3 years ago
Then your parents follow a false god. Which is, actually, any god.
fundiebasher 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
evolutionisforetards if you put it that way.. How can a Son of a GAY and WHORE as you .. know less..
resistanceunion 3 years ago
muslims=child molesters
Zuurkool1 2 years ago
Muslims=child molesters
Christians=child molesters
Jews=child molesters
You=child molester
:-)
GhostOfPaley 2 years ago 3
"Forcy force force"... Hilarious.
nolobede 3 years ago 3
Brilliant.
bonangusacdc 3 years ago 2
science is a beautiful thing,nature is a beautiful thing,man is the height of Gods wonder in this world,in his image we were made,it really is that simple,laws rule this universe from the law of gravity to the laws of nature,to the law of love,the 10 commandments,nice an simple
sliew72 3 years ago
just about every bit of scientific knowledge is based around evolution,even my good mate wikipedia,annoys the friggen hell outta me,its deceptive,wrong, and misleading,how its made ground in some churches is beyond me,the 2 cannot be shared for God is the death of evolution and vice versa,but even worse they label it science,like religion,evolution has its followers,therefore should be classed as a religion
sliew72 3 years ago
evolution is science, and the unifying theory in biology. if not for evolution, biology would be nothing but trivia. also, modern medicine is relying more on evolution theory.
some churches are simply accepting the scientific truth, and no longer clinging to bronze-age (or older) myths. evolution says nothing about a god at all.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
i believe the population levels we have now and the associated history fit the biblical timeframe,the expansion of mankind from his beginings in mesopotamia,mans "Cradle of civilization"or so refered to as"land between the two rivers"LOL i feel like some professor with this wikipedia
sliew72 3 years ago
you can believe what you want, but that doesn't change what archaeologists find.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
how is it that the eye seems to work in the same way in us as it does with animals and insects?how is it that evolution has evolved exactly the same principle for sight in just about all creatures?conicidence?or a design standard that has been employed in a variety of ways to suit?
sliew72 3 years ago
(i think it ate my damn post)
the different eyes we see didn't evolve all on their own. they are all descended from light-sensitive cells, the photocells i mentioned before. as life branched out, so did eyes.
a bit of an eye is better than none at all, and eyes became more sophisticated as 'add-ons' improved them.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
the fact that the eye works in basically the same fashion in humans as it would in insects, and that is by detecting light, indicates that evolution has a incredible capacity for good ole luck and coincidence thats its just not funny,even the eyes of a snail as basic as they are, employ the same fuction,to detect light
sliew72 3 years ago
Eyes are organs that detect light. Different kinds of light-sensitive organs are found in a variety of animals, the eye works by allowing light to enter it and project onto a light-sensitive panel of cells, known as the retina, at the rear of the eye. The cone cells (for color) and the rod cells (for low-light contrasts) in the retina detect and convert light into neural signals. The visual signals are then transmitted to the brain via the optic nerve.
sliew72 3 years ago
where is the history and population levels to give with the vast time spans given for mans existance in his current form?if evolution is an undeniable,scientifically proven fact then this should be quite an easy question for u Vaststrike,just bear in mind,there a 6.5 billion people alive today,and there were only 200 million 1AD,and the oldest civilization is aincent sumer,between 4000-3000 BC
sliew72 3 years ago
human population growth was a lot slower in ancient history, and during prehistoric times, due to lower technology. i'm just saying this because you seem to think population's an issue somehow.
why do you think we need populations and other info from prehistoric times to prove evolution? before writing, history was kept by storytellers. much of this became the myths we see today. hunter-gatherers just didn't have any need for detailed, accurate histories, so much of pre-writing history is lost.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
yes human population growth was slower,only because the total population was smaller,as each year goes by the growth increases,growth of a population will run hand in hand with timespan,general knowledge in this area has been documented and tampered i believe to fit the evolutionary timescale,especially in the time 1AD to 70,000 BC,from 1AD to 2008 this area is free of such adjustments because of census taking that started during the reign of ceasar,thus the results cannot be doctored
sliew72 3 years ago
"...tampered i believe to fit the evolutionary timescale..."
don't even start with that conspiracy theory crap. i won't put up with it. if you start claiming that any information put out by someone that argues against your point is fabricated, then there's absolutely no point in discussing the matter with you.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
as for proving evolution from population levels or history,it cant be done,but thats not my point,my point is that there is no population levels or history to go with the time spans 70,000 BC 1 AD,have a look at the world now,have a look as little as a 1000 yrs ago and see where man is,the then known world has shrunk quite dramatically,wheres america,or australia?go back another 1000 yrs and the then known world is only a quater of wat it is now
sliew72 3 years ago
logic says that if we go back another 2000 yrs or more there will this much on earth...0
sliew72 3 years ago
i assume you're going off a faulty timescale, which ignores many factors.
now, before the days of sophisticated technology, we were hunter-gatherers, living poor lives. many died young, many mothers died in childbirth, and many died hunting or in accidents. new factors, like medicine and farming, increased survival and spurred population growth by a significant factor. farming and medicine have improved greatly, spurring growth on even more. that is exactly why your population idea is faulty.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
im using the wikipedia timescale,its a evolution timescale,they were farming in Sumer,mesopotamia,history speaks of wars and famines,plagues,if you think medicine or hunting accidents or even childbirth slowed them down,well i hate to disappoint you cause those things still happen today,a vast share of the worlds population are still 3rd world conditions
sliew72 3 years ago
is the vast majority of mankind still wearing animal skins and following herds of animals? no. farming had the biggest impact on population growth, but medicine has contributed greatly. even a 3rd world nation today is much better than those primitive days before farming, and will show a vast difference in child survival and population growth.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
i just told you before farming was around mesopotamia,about 4000BC,remember aincient Sumer?as for animal skins im not sure
sliew72 3 years ago
i saw something about this once. i believe they started farming due to increasing arid conditions, and civilization grew from there. they herded animals as well as farming. not sure when crops for clothing materials started. but clothing was made from animal hair at a pretty early time, i think.
the hunter-gatherers wore skins from their kills. i'm sure it continued for quite a while after the beginning of farming and herding, until they had enough free time to experiment.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
sliew72 I understand you don't like the theory of evolution; however, that doesn't change that evolution happened. Your denial of evolution is reminiscent of holocaust denial. The evidence for evolution has been compiled for over 150 years and the theory stands. That is about as sound a theory as you can have in science. I don't see you fighting cell theory, the theory of gravitation, the theory of relativity, germ theory or any of the other theories that help you on a daily basis.
AtheistrEvolutionist 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
theres no denying the holocaust,theres no denying if you jump off a 10 storey building your gonna get hurt,theres no denying mans abilities to see microscopic organisms,cells and germs,or his knowledge of stars,or that things fact that there were huge creatures that once walked this earth,evolution cannot be placed in the same light as these,even the theory of relativity is based upon observance,something i think evolution will have a hard time in proving
sliew72 3 years ago
And just like that you are wrong. People do deny the holocaust they call it "holocaust denial". I am not the first to make the comparison. Also evolution has been observed. Evolution is the fundamental principle of biology and is just as useful if not more useful than the theory of relativity. In other words you're wrong. If you don't like it I suggest you just get over it. I don't wish to be rude but sometimes the truth hurts. Also you don't "prove" theories in science.
AtheistrEvolutionist 3 years ago 2
rude?your too nice to be rude,truthfully,lol.People believe wat they want concerning the holocaust,my point is that such a thing happened,a historical fact,its in the movies ,the books,the people who lived thru it,some r still alive today,in other words,"theres no denying the holocaust"
sliew72 3 years ago
For some reason youtube won't let me post the link for you. So just go to wiki and type in Holocaust denial. You will find plenty of info there. I have met people that deny evolution, the moon landing, and even the Holocaust but never someone who denies Holocaust denial.
AtheistrEvolutionist 3 years ago
TALK ABOUT COINCIDENCE OBAMA IS ON TV RIGHT NOW TALKING ABOUT HOLOCAUST DENIAL!!!!!!! No shit I am serious that was funny.
AtheistrEvolutionist 3 years ago
look at indias masses,look at the millions from africa,the arabic and asiatic races,notice also that these countries with the highest population levels in the world are also nearest to the "Cradle of civilization"
sliew72 3 years ago
mankind evolved in africa, spread from there, and 3rd world nations, preindustrial nations, tend to have a higher birth rate than developed nations. medicine, though primitive in a lot of these areas, is still better than nothing, as the hunter-gatherers lived.
also, don't forget most westerners are immigrants. more people would stay home rather than immigrate.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
dont you think that the huge population numbers in 3rd world countries contradict wat your saying?
sliew72 3 years ago
no, i didn't contradict myself. just look at the post "mankind evolved in africa", if you haven't yet. and don't forget that population growth slows in postindustrial times.
could you start digging beyond the surface with your information? stop throwing information at me that just seems to support your beliefs. it's been ridiculously easy to break them down, simply by finding the rest of the story.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
you broke them down by finding the rest of the story?how does the rest of the story go?is that the one with mankind originating in africa over 7 million yrs ago?lol,yea you got me there,lets be honest here you contradicted yourself previously,why you think a paleoanthropologists account on where life came from based findings of apelike bones and fossils is gonna convince me is puzzling,you have yet to account for man in his current form combined with a 70,000 yr history
sliew72 3 years ago
the stories behind your facts, the additional information.
how exactly did i contradict myself?
the overall story of the human race is longer than 70,000 years, by the way. they've found fossil homo sapiens estimated at around 195,000 years. i spoke about the history issue. prehistoric humans didn't keep detailed histories.
-shrugs- fossils of human ancestors are there, and have been well-studied. but, of course, you reject transitional fossils, right? on what grounds, i'm curious.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
if i didnt reject transitional fossils i would be a evolutionist,or do you need a more indepth explanation?as for contradicting yourself,take your own advice and read the posts and far as im concerned 70,000 yrs wasnt enough for you huh,now humans have been around 195,000 yrs,there wouldnt be enough room on this planet for a population of 70,000 yrs let alone a 195,000 figure
sliew72 3 years ago
so, you're still ignoring the factors of farming and medicine, as if they had nothing to do with population growth whatsoever.
know what, i'm done here. you've ignored everything i've told you, or dismissed it out of hand, and continued with the same blatant logical fallacies.
i don't know why i keep letting myself get dragged into scientific arguments with the scientifically ignorant. probably the hope i'll find someone who's simply ignorant, and not willfully ignorant.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
im actually flattered to think that im having a scientific argument with you ,lol,but your right i am scientifically deficient in matters concerning evolution,but why would i need to know if i think the principles are wrong to begin with anyway,not to mention its most obvious fault that seems to defy logic,history and even common sense,
sliew72 3 years ago
if you never learn about something, how can you learn if you're wrong? and i used the word scientific loosely. it was a bit one-sided.
have you not payed attention to a single damn thing i've said?! we don't think humans were too dumb to start farming sooner. they were forced to start farming by conditions that made the hunter-gatherer life untenable. remember, the growing arid conditions?
that is what i call willful ignorance, and that's why i have such a poor opinion of creationists.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
if im guilty of willful ignorance then your guilty of stupidity,lack of commonsense,lack of logic,and a willingness to follow blindly the opinions of your peers and believe without question there views on worldly origins,some clown picks up a bone and says its 80 million yrs old you all agree,and YOU have a poor opinion of creationists
sliew72 3 years ago
by the way ive paid close attention to everything youve said,we seem to backtracking over this farming issue,you originally bought this point up to explain the population increase when i mentioned the different rates between BC 2000 to 1 AD and 1 AD to 2005,but we both know farming has been around way before then.What got them started farming,arid conditions?hunter life untenable?who knows for sure,one things for sure and that is they were farming
sliew72 3 years ago
yes i agree farming and medicine will aid the growth,as ive said before farming has been around a long time since mesopotamia,thats roughly 4000 BC,for some reason evolutionists seem to think people were to dumb back then to look after themselves
sliew72 3 years ago
by the way where r these transitional fossils?you know the phrase "missing link" should be rephrased "missing links"cause if your gonna show me transitional fossils,then you have to provide transsitional fossils for everything,plants,man,beast,whatever,good luck and happy hunting
sliew72 3 years ago
there's still a lot of talk about older civilizations than ancient sumer.
egyptologist()org/discus/messages/24/5545()html?1043589104
has some interesting talk on the origins of early civilization.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
I'm with you DrakeBlackHorn. As a great secular humanist once said "everyone's an atheist of something. There's been so many gods in so many cultures. We just go one god further."
Evolution is an undeniable, scientifically provable fact. Get over it Sliew72 - and learn how to spell.
vastrike 3 years ago
drakeblackhorn i dont know why u say i keep posting my comments sepaparately,what do u mean?how can you lose track,theres only u and me posting here,and i dont know wat u mean by strawman and i thought i had brought up a good point with my strongest argument,apparently not,
sliew72 3 years ago
are you pressing "reply" on my comments, or posting in the box at the bottom of the screen? because i haven't received reply emails, and your comments are not attached to mine on the screen. i have to keep checking the video to see if you've replied.
a strawman is when you misrepresent an opponent's argument or standpoint, replacing it with a weaker version, and defeat the weaker version, then pretend you defeated the real argument.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
ah i c,didnt realise this would send an email and post here at the same time,and thx you for taking the time to explain the strawman meaning,now that i know wat u mean i suppose the ferrai does come across that way,well then lets look at humans and see if i can see signs of manufacture
sliew72 3 years ago
what would you consider signs of manufacture? what comes to mind for me are nuts and bolts/screws, welds, and tool marks. and, of course, the known presence of the builder.
i haven't seen any of this in living things.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
humans have things that are similar and common in the natural world of animals and insects,for instance eyes,all eyes are not the same,for example a cat,or even a owl,they see better than us at night,or a eagle has really good eyesight to spot out its prey from high up,whatever animal or insect it may be a similar design is found in the way sight works
sliew72 3 years ago
eyes are an excellent survival trait, so in evolution, you would expect those that gained eyes to take off, and eyes would become the norm. with evolution, you would also expect a great deal of variation in the eye.
you can actually take evolutionary models for the eye, from photocell to human eye, and find living examples of most steps in nature.
now, why are humans so similar to other vertebrate life? the answer seems obvious to me. common descent, supported by various types of evidence.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
something from nothing,MAGIC
sliew72 3 years ago
something from nothing? that would be a strawman of big bang, not evolution.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
Sliew, Only Creationists believe something came from nothing. Stop trying to tell me what I believe.
EebstertheGreat 2 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you wanna know why i call it magic?the reasons are many,let me give you what i feel is my strongest argument against evolution,where is the history and population levels to give with the vast time spans given for mans existance in his current form?
sliew72 3 years ago
you think that because scientists can't give exact detail, then the whole thing's wrong? that's a ridiculous demand, which suggests you'll never have 'enough evidence' to accept it.
the scientific community, as i said before, has already gathered enough evidence to conclude that evolutionary theory is sound. and the existence of the evolution process is no longer debated at all, only details! evolution is a known process. evolution theories explain it, and take it further.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
look drakeblackhorn,i think its a real pain in the butt to find the comment that you replied to and reply back,if you wanna know wat ive said jump on and check, i think thats better than getting a heap emails, as im very interested in the topic i plan to be around to make evolutionists see the light
sliew72 3 years ago
i've 'seen the light'. i was raised christian, and left because i started reading the bible. i didn't even get deep into science until after i'd left.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
by the way, why are you posting your comments separate from mine? do you not want me to know you're responding?...... lol yea im scared your gonna make me into a evolutionists...wats there to be scared of?wat have you said to me thats scary,.lol
sliew72 3 years ago
so, if you're not scared, then why are you posting them separate? i didn't actually say you were scared, by the way. i was thinking it's more likely you wanted me to lose track, so it'd look like you were unchallenged. it's happened to me many times, so it's a reasonable thought.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wat was so ridiculous about the ferrari example?its a logical example that you cant get around except to say im illlerate in science,that if i knew evolutions finer points and have studied and learnt the other factors of evolution that i wouldnt be saying wat im saying,that i wouldnt be ignorant...lol
sliew72 3 years ago
a ferrari is a machine. it does not reproduce, does not mutate, is not affected by selection or environmental pressures, and shows obvious signs of manufacture. we know for a fact it was built, and can see those who built it.
comparing it to living things is nothing but a weak strawman.
you know what? unless you bring up a real point in your next slew of comments, i'm not going to bother with you anymore. you'll also have to show you actually do understand at least the basics of evolution.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago 5
just because i dont know the inbetweens of evolution doesnt mean i dont know wat evolutions about,even my kid can tell me the basics of evolution,at which point i start from in evolution makes no difference,whether it be from the monkeys or amino acids or from something even simpler,the end results are the same
sliew72 3 years ago
so, if you know evolution, why do you insist on calling it magic? also, what do you make of the evidence that has convinced the scientific community?
by the way, why are you posting your comments separate from mine? do you not want me to know you're responding?
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago 3
copied and pasted from wikipedia
sliew72 3 years ago
when water vapor first liquefied,[2] and 2.7 billion years ago, when the ratio of stable isotopes of carbon (12C and 13C), iron (56Fe, 57Fe, and 58Fe) and sulfur (32S, 33S, 34S, and 36S) points to a biogenic origin of minerals and sediments[3][4] and molecular biomarkers indicate photosynthesis.[5][6] This topic also includes panspermia and other exogenic theories regarding possible extra-planetary or extraterrestrial origins of life.[7]
sliew72 3 years ago
In the natural sciences, abiogenesis, the question of the origin of life, is the study of how life on Earth emerged from non-life. Scientific consensus is that abiogenesis occurred sometime between 4.4 billion years ago
sliew72 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wat did u think u need to go to university to learn that?i know about evolution is why i dismiss it
sliew72 3 years ago
and if you do know about evolution, and have studied it using reliable sources, you will know about the great amount of evidence that has been gathered. for the scientific community, it is quite incontrovertible with the current evidence.
you give a scanty description, leaving out substance and detail, that itself nearly forms a strawman argument. you do know about abiogenesis, right? evolution only starts with the first primitive structures that could possibly be called 'life'.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago 3
i do know about evolution,i was taught it in school,you see it on tv,cable internet,libraries have hundreds of books on them,everyone knows about evolution,wats so hard about knowing we all came from amino acids that eventually became us
sliew72 3 years ago
you haven't shown any working knowledge, and i've only seen people who were scientifically illiterate say the ridiculous things you have.
"...oh look a evolved ferrari...", "...4 billion yrs from amino acid to man aint magic?", and "...put together by chance..." point towards ignorance concerning evolution.
abiogenesis begins with even simpler things than amino acids, just so you know.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
when you see a ferrari driving past u dont say "oh look a evolved ferrari",yet humans are the most complex things on earth and weve been put together by chance,my ass,wats the chances of a ferrari being put together by chance?,and u evolutionists have the nerve to call this logical,aint nuthun logical about it at all,illogical is more like it
sliew72 3 years ago
it's easy to just dismiss something you don't know anything about, isn't it? you wouldn't say such ignorant things if you'd bother to learn.
drakeblackhorn 3 years ago 4