@NotJustYouNoob funny, I don't see any videos of your expert stance using a "non-overengineered" blade wtf'ever that is... thanks for the belittling though.
@l3054 LOL, I never claimed I was an experienced cutter, in fact this was my THIRD time ever using this for anything other than to show how small a sword can look in my hands ;)
There are young guys in Glasgow with smaller bits of steel who do much more dammage on a Saturday night.
strathpipe 2 months ago
Tiny claymore
CheyTac2 4 months ago
@CheyTac2 or a really big swordsman. he looks to be taller then 6'4''
STLOU87 3 months ago
@STLOU87 Primitive Claymores are like 5' long, at least those Ive handled were all 5', that looks nowhere near 5 feet.
CheyTac2 3 months ago
@CheyTac2 that claymore is nearly 53" ;)
sacajamore 1 month ago
@sacajamore Thats certainly the smallest one Ive seen. The one Ive had experience with is 60".
CheyTac2 1 month ago
Wrong stance, bad footwork and an overengineered blade, why would you expect him to be able to cut through all of them?
NotJustYouNoob 5 months ago
@NotJustYouNoob funny, I don't see any videos of your expert stance using a "non-overengineered" blade wtf'ever that is... thanks for the belittling though.
sacajamore 1 month ago
wallace would of cut through them all ;)
leexlma 1 year ago
@leexlma this mans not wallace and his skill isnt that good
l3054 7 months ago
@l3054 LOL, I never claimed I was an experienced cutter, in fact this was my THIRD time ever using this for anything other than to show how small a sword can look in my hands ;)
sacajamore 1 month ago