@DarkEmoE This video was posted a back in september, yes AMD has it 8 core for general use, which intel doesn't have yet. But it is a waiting game. Intel will pick up, then AMD and so on
@OnlyMasterMas actually amds releasing many new seeries of cpus soon this year. so intels just going to fall behind even more. and amds even said there not even caring about the race/war between them and intel
@DarkEmoE AMDs Zambei CPUs pipeline is more elongated. The advantage is this is that it allows it to be pushed to a higher frequency but that's the double edged sword of it. It needs to run at a higher frequency in order to match the competitors product. As of right now to this date there is no reason to basically go for AMD as Intels performance vs price ratio is excellent with their Sandy Bridge and not to soon Ivy Bridge processors.
kk.. i dont get it? got AMD athlon 250 dual core and its running skyrim on ultra no-lag... and any other game except GTA 4 (well you know it laggs when its loading.)
still dont get it why they say intel is the better? maybe i have missed out on some processors that are three times more expensive than AMD?
@ulfenstyle 3 times more expensive? AMD's top new processor is the FX8150 at $269 on Newegg and Intel's comparable processor is the 2600k is $329 also on Newegg. 3 times the price? I think not. I can get one at Microcenter for $279 right now. Thats 10 dollars more for a superior product. There is a reason AMD is failing as a company and Intel is thriving. Search for comparison vids here on youtube of the benchmarks of both of these processors and you will see which one is better.... Intel.
I never understood why people say "play low end games", I have a 965 Phenom II X4 and a VisionTek Radeon HD 5750 and I watch live tv on Windows Media Center and play games like Driver SF; NFS - Run, Hot Pursuit, and Shift 2 Unleashed just fine with no problems on max setting 1920x1080p. And I play BF3 and Crysis 2 max setting 1920x1080p but with Live tv off just perfectly. Why would I spend up to 300 or 400 hundreds more just to do the same thing or run BF3 and live tv at the same time?
@YankiEBubbAAussiE For me it is piece of mind and stability. Intel and Nvidia are better companies period. I owned 2 ati cards in the past and had nothing but issues with the drivers and support. I got an Nvidia card and not 1 issue. I have bought about 8 nvidia cards since. Same with AMD processors. I think 300 or 400 dollars is a bit of an exaggeration. The two comparable processors right now are about 30 bucks difference and video cards maybe 50. You get what you pay for.
Ive had an AMD Phenom II x6 1055t for a year now, and im switching back to intel, gonna get a 2600K. Im mainly a gamer playing the high end games such as battlefield3. It also bottlenecks my dual 6970s. For a mid range gaming PC i would go with AMD. But for a high end gaming pc, definetly intel
@Camster3 yep that sums it up. I'm not a budget gamer. I want the best. Whats an extra 100 bucks on some thing you will literally get thousands of hours out of? Besides AMD is going bankrupt. They lost 170 million last year while intel grossed 13 billion.
I've had an intel celeron and it ran crappily and now have a computer with an amd e-series and it runs very smoothly, but I get relatively low/mid range computers. The core i5/i7 computers are probably going to be my next purchase now that I'm heading to college soon. I'm not a gamer by any means so I don't care about game performance. I like both brands :)
i really like the low power Amd like Be-2400 or e-series think my net cpu will be a 905e they run really cool i even think if i had to it could run cool enough paste free my be-2400 has be over clock 2 3.0 for weeks now no hiccups
Unless you are broke as hell, 200$ is not a lot to spend on a CPU, which is why the 2500k is dominating, seeing how cheap it is, and it is superior in gaming performance then any other AMD CPU, even the ones that are even for expensive.
@RecoveryAfterMath intel better for gaming but if you want good cpu for gaming that not cost a lot of money take amd phenom ii x4 965 black edition and if you want intel cpu get the 2500k
@Droidflute ooh btw i had a 875k, i sold it because i needed money... but my frames dindt drop that much, bfbc2 it did only drop 3 frames per sec... and i admit that intel is better, but for the money of a 990x, i can buy a: AMD AM3+ FX-6100, Good aftrmarket heatsink, crossfire two 6870´s,
and some noctua fans for good airflow = overclock. and the processor will peform fine, not as good as a 990x but i spend the same and i did get: GFX, FANS, Aftermarket heatsink... you understand me?
@TheManMetal You're a moron if you would ever buy a 990x for gaming. The 1100t or 2500k is basically the best you can get. Ya you may get 3+ FPS from a 3960x, but you're a god if you can differentiate the difference, and if you are, you deserve the best.
@Droidflute Precisely ^_^ When you have a 200$ CPU that can dominate the world of gaming, even up to the 3960x where it is about 3-5FPS short in 99% of games, plus bundle that with a nice asrock sli mobo for 120$
Why again would i choose AMD? I mean that's cheap as hell...
@Fortune2point0 dude, im talking about a 6 core fx that actually costs 110 bucks processor vs a intel core i7 980x...
and 2600k is better for gaming but not better for rendering... because in cinebench the 8 core fx processor beats a 2600k because cinebench uses all cores...
man... just admit that, amd is better for the price.
@TheManMetal Yes, you're comparing a cheap processor to an overpriced one and saying it's better for the price, of course it is. An Athlon dual core has better dollar per frame ratio than anything else out there, but price:performance isn't everything.
And now you're talking about 8 core FX? And Cinebench is a synthetic benchmark, not real-world rendering. In actual rendering applications (3dsmax), and HD video encoding, the 2600k wins (not to mention it OCs better on air/water).
@ThePeacemaker5000 You're comparing mobile parts, which perform worse and are more expensive than their desktop counterparts, to your desktop parts, and using that as a basis for a price:performance argument? Rofl, you're an idiot, kid.
@Fortune2point0 ............ ok first im not t stupid i thought about this too and i took 250 euros from the price so that the laptop and pc are ....dontknowthatword compareable? whaterver his coust 750 mine 500 ok ?
@hevimetallimias Amd isn't even making the phenom or athlon series. All of that is discontinued. Its stupid to buy the new bulldozer architecture, its honestly a waste of money. Even the i3-2100 has better performance in gaming than the fx 8150 and is half the price.
For Intel fanboys, I'm not fanboy off both. I use both but without AMD Intel's prices would be a lot higher, because they would have monopoly. Thank you AMD for keeping prices down:).
@hevimetallimias Because AMD is a copy of intel, if you do not remember around 10 years ago amd which was a branch of intel to make cpu's, decided they wanted to make their own cpu's. It is an exact copy, you don't know anything about performance and benchmarking. 90% of all the computers in the world are all intel. Try comparing the fx 8150 to the i5-2500k which is cheaper, the fx loses in almost every scenario and is on the most current "architecture."
i've had two laptops in the past year one with amd and one with intel there both great but i found that if you want to play a game that probibly wont play very well the intel will give up and wont work wheras the amd prosessor will go for it but get very hot (but not shut down) 90 degrees celcius.
Hmmm. let me ask something.Betwen an Intel dual core (not core 2 quad) and an AMD phenom II X4 that they are the same price, i should buy the Intel Dual Core because its better?
amd has a great gaming feel to their cpus and gpus.. used amd phenom II x4 @ 3.4 ghz and amd hd 6970 by sapphire and this is a great base for your pc at a price around $460. to get similar performance in a intel and nvidia is a nvidia gtx 580 and intel core i5-760 lynnfield and the price for that is $680 so even if you went to gtx 570 its still about $100 more and the performance is nearly no different.. the reason you would buy that intel setup is because you can say "i have intel"
@dragonode1 it depends on what graphic card and processor you are buying. AMD and Intel have both great gaming processors and graphic cards. if you are buying an Nvidia graphic card, than you should buy an intel processor. and if you are getting a ATI or AMD graphic card. than buy an AMD processor because the 2 work better with each other.' ATI/AMD with an AMD CPU has much more processing power than an ATI/AMD with an intel CPU.
@T0a5tbr0t I didnt say that they will work bad with each other but AMD with AMD is better than AMD with Nvidia same to intel with nvidia than intel and AMD
@bombach007 Intel has nothing to do with Nvidia... So with Intel its fucking same do you have ATi or Nvidia GPU. But for ATI/AMD GPU & CPU it works better with Ati GPU & AMD CPU. I still got AMD/ Nvidia and no problems.. IMo the performance is so low percentage between ati/amd so I chose Nvidia.
@hevimetallimias First off, AMD video cards and processors do not work better together. Second, Intel is keeping AMD from doing the same thing, so don't forget to thank Intel.
The best thing you can do is match you manufacturers. ATI and AMD, Intel and NVidia. The pro of AMD is that its the best value for money and today, AMD CPU's are not realy slower then Intel
Intel does have some very extreme CPU but would I buy them, with money? no.. I do have an intel atm but that was because then I bought it, AMD had no competetive CPU for it.
I don't realy agree with everything this guy says but there are loads of facts in there.
@EliteGhost001 Yeah, at which did I say that ATI/AMD wouldn't have anything to do together?... Learn to read and shut the fuck up kid. Back to school. Blocked uneducated tard. kthxbye
And where did I say NVidia and Intel DO have something together. What i said was people should get AMD&ATI because they work better together. That leaves Intel with NVidia. Now stop trying to sound smart and go cry in a corner.
@4232267 In total performance regardless of price which one would you buy? Intel or amd. Obviously in performance intel dominates over amd, but for price people would buy an amd processor.
@Amuffin456 Retarded fanboy spotted. I got both Intel & AMD setup. And to be honest. I would chose with money... I dont give a damn fuck if some CPU dominates other but the dominator one costs a fcuking 1000+ euros or dollars.. Tbh thats retarded to pay that much for a fucking CPu for gaming.. I hate fanboys so fucking much. Blocked btw.
@hevimetallimias The i5-2500k is a great example of your stupidity. The 2500k costs cheaper than the fx 8150 and has better performance than it. It also has higher performance than anything on amd's side.
@4232267 6 cores 12 threads vs 6 cores 6 threads....sorry :D Also phenom 1100t isn't even compared to the i7-2600k, it is compared to the i5-2500k. Where the 2500k destroys the phenom 1100t.
@TheVeisonchen it depends on the product itself. AMD and Intel are both companies and making products, AMD has some better products than intel and intel has some better products than AMD. if you are getting an ATI/AMD GPU than get an AMD CPU. if you are getting and Nvidia GPU than get a Intel CPU better because the too work better with each other. you are just being a fanboy. you ever looked at the AMD Radeon HD 6990? go search it and see how many people are complaining about that GPU.
what's up with the screen behind you.what's the nacher pichers r doing in technology video and
AMD cpu r out of bugs i mean when i install games and software some it stucks and application wont start ,i install race driver grid game when i start thegame it goes on infinite loading scren so i did was in the asus bios i disable the 1 core the game runs fine i am not on AMDside orINTEL but when thay make many CPU they make many issues when issues r there the game developer switch 2 the console side
let me enlighten you guys. I work at a computer store and i do know which CPU's are better. For people who want average performance i reccomend AMD, for people who really enjoy computers and know alot about computers, go for intel because its more powerfull. If your a pro gamer get Intel if you want average games go AMD. I personnaly prefer intel.
I agree with that mostly. Usually Intel is known for higher performance than AMD howeverI myself am using an amd in my current build and it is fine for gaming. this build is a gaming build with a low budget so i went with and amd quad core and a nice water cooler for it. then went with the 6970 for my build. Honestly gaming wise cpu does matter but you have to remember that intel hd integrated graphics aren't great for gaming. I know that if a person is a pro gamer they... TBC next
Probably have a bigger budget but i was limited so instead of spending a lot on a higher end cpu and less on the gpu I would do it the other way. lower end cpu to gpu for better gaming.
@Xboxfanftw Your comment makes no fucking sense at all... I got AMD & I don't play games at average. Graphsdriver is more needed for driect x games.. I got GTX 570 & AMD Phenom X4 965 and everything runs perfect fps with high settings.
@gkarv1 Also did you just made these lies up in your head just like that? Watch reviews and benchmarks and you'll notice that you're very wrong, I wouldn't buy i 990x nor 980x, BUT they are way ahead of phenom six cores, I mean you just can't compare them either in price or in performance... Even if phenom six core was running at 5GHz and 990x on stock (3,4GHz) it would be still faster... Intel can keep the prices up high because AMD doesn't have competitor against Intel's high end CPU's.
@gkarv1 They aren't even near in terms of performance... Yes, i7 980X and i7 990X cost a lot, but those who want only the best don't care about the price... even 2nd gen i5 4 cores rick roll Phenom six core in almost everything, especially in gaming and they cost about the same. Check benchmarks. i7's on the other hand are way ahead phenom of six cores, but they cost more. You get what you pay for. Only desperate fanboys claim otherwise. Low budget = AMD, High end build = Intel, simple as that.
Well, AMD is waaaaaaay better than Intel, however, Intel has beaten AMD with the performance of Intel Core I3, I5 and I7, but, anyway, a dual core AMD processor is still very performant and has a low price in comparison with the new Intel processors. For example, I have a 500 bux PC wit an AMD Athlon II Dual Core 3.2GHz, 4GB RAM DDR3, 500GB HDD and NVidia GeForce GTS 450 Video Card 1GB DDR5. The processor was very cheap and I can run CoD Black Ops at a decent performance, so get an AMDprocessor!
Ow lol ... i whana see AMD and intel work together O_O i wonder what will they do with they'r knows .... Well maybe in the future where there will be like flying trains maybe there will always be AMD and intel and maybe they will work together and they'r processors and stuff will be the best .. just personal thinking xD
i don't know why people are fanboys for each different processor. its not like you work for them. you're buying a processor for a computer. why argue about it? bunch of children.
@IAmSomeoneOrOther I maybe used mac like couple of times, but never owned one so I wouldnt know. Its logical that higher quality products cost more due to that it costs more to actually manufacture them.
As of now AMD's top of the line processor is $189, Intel's is $1000(newegg prices). Now how fucked up would it be if something that was $1000 wasn't as good as something that was $200? The real question should be... Is it worth $800 more? In my opinion, fuck no. I can build a whole gaming rig for $800... a good gaming rig.
@venomblade891 and by lightyears you mean a marginally noticealbe increase in performance raise because i know that when people say lightyears there eather getting paied to say it or they dont know what there talking about
@venomblade891 yae but lightyears is saying you would benchmark and it would be on the list if it was lightyears i would expect it to be running at 1 thz so if you saying rhe benchmark said lightyears then yae the benchmark is lieing right to your face that benchmark is giving you its bag of black lies
He doesn't blink... Cuz.. He got 'em water cooled .. :D
AuraLogic 3 days ago
if intel has the fastest cpus are the fastest overclocking ones then how come amd has held the record for highest speed cpu and highest overclock?
DarkEmoE 1 week ago
@DarkEmoE This video was posted a back in september, yes AMD has it 8 core for general use, which intel doesn't have yet. But it is a waiting game. Intel will pick up, then AMD and so on
OnlyMasterMas 1 week ago
@OnlyMasterMas actually amds releasing many new seeries of cpus soon this year. so intels just going to fall behind even more. and amds even said there not even caring about the race/war between them and intel
DarkEmoE 6 days ago
@DarkEmoE AMDs Zambei CPUs pipeline is more elongated. The advantage is this is that it allows it to be pushed to a higher frequency but that's the double edged sword of it. It needs to run at a higher frequency in order to match the competitors product. As of right now to this date there is no reason to basically go for AMD as Intels performance vs price ratio is excellent with their Sandy Bridge and not to soon Ivy Bridge processors.
(I'm not a Intel fanboy btw).
undeadkillers 4 days ago
in blind tests more people prefer amd over intel.
DarkEmoE 3 weeks ago
kk.. i dont get it? got AMD athlon 250 dual core and its running skyrim on ultra no-lag... and any other game except GTA 4 (well you know it laggs when its loading.)
still dont get it why they say intel is the better? maybe i have missed out on some processors that are three times more expensive than AMD?
ulfenstyle 1 month ago
@ulfenstyle 3 times more expensive? AMD's top new processor is the FX8150 at $269 on Newegg and Intel's comparable processor is the 2600k is $329 also on Newegg. 3 times the price? I think not. I can get one at Microcenter for $279 right now. Thats 10 dollars more for a superior product. There is a reason AMD is failing as a company and Intel is thriving. Search for comparison vids here on youtube of the benchmarks of both of these processors and you will see which one is better.... Intel.
oldsk8r 1 month ago
I never understood why people say "play low end games", I have a 965 Phenom II X4 and a VisionTek Radeon HD 5750 and I watch live tv on Windows Media Center and play games like Driver SF; NFS - Run, Hot Pursuit, and Shift 2 Unleashed just fine with no problems on max setting 1920x1080p. And I play BF3 and Crysis 2 max setting 1920x1080p but with Live tv off just perfectly. Why would I spend up to 300 or 400 hundreds more just to do the same thing or run BF3 and live tv at the same time?
YankiEBubbAAussiE 1 month ago
@YankiEBubbAAussiE For me it is piece of mind and stability. Intel and Nvidia are better companies period. I owned 2 ati cards in the past and had nothing but issues with the drivers and support. I got an Nvidia card and not 1 issue. I have bought about 8 nvidia cards since. Same with AMD processors. I think 300 or 400 dollars is a bit of an exaggeration. The two comparable processors right now are about 30 bucks difference and video cards maybe 50. You get what you pay for.
oldsk8r 1 month ago
Get a AMD 4.2ghz 8x is better
joshuamelse 1 month ago
@joshuamelse amd fx is shit
buzz9961 1 month ago
Intel and easy overclocking... Yeah right...
timhtje 1 month ago
Ive had an AMD Phenom II x6 1055t for a year now, and im switching back to intel, gonna get a 2600K. Im mainly a gamer playing the high end games such as battlefield3. It also bottlenecks my dual 6970s. For a mid range gaming PC i would go with AMD. But for a high end gaming pc, definetly intel
Camster3 1 month ago
@Camster3 yep that sums it up. I'm not a budget gamer. I want the best. Whats an extra 100 bucks on some thing you will literally get thousands of hours out of? Besides AMD is going bankrupt. They lost 170 million last year while intel grossed 13 billion.
oldsk8r 1 month ago
I've had an intel celeron and it ran crappily and now have a computer with an amd e-series and it runs very smoothly, but I get relatively low/mid range computers. The core i5/i7 computers are probably going to be my next purchase now that I'm heading to college soon. I'm not a gamer by any means so I don't care about game performance. I like both brands :)
MichiganTechReviewer 1 month ago
intel!!!!!
buzz9961 1 month ago
he really didnt blink
romar601 2 months ago
i really like the low power Amd like Be-2400 or e-series think my net cpu will be a 905e they run really cool i even think if i had to it could run cool enough paste free my be-2400 has be over clock 2 3.0 for weeks now no hiccups
uofm49426 2 months ago
he says if you only have 5000 $ well i only got 1400 so im going to an amd side ahaHah
skolnieks1993 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unless you are broke as hell, 200$ is not a lot to spend on a CPU, which is why the 2500k is dominating, seeing how cheap it is, and it is superior in gaming performance then any other AMD CPU, even the ones that are even for expensive.
Orexll 2 months ago
wait so which one is better for gaming?
RecoveryAfterMath 2 months ago
@RecoveryAfterMath At this point in time, Intel beats AMD in gaming at nearly every price point (except the <$80 segment).
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
@RecoveryAfterMath intel better for gaming but if you want good cpu for gaming that not cost a lot of money take amd phenom ii x4 965 black edition and if you want intel cpu get the 2500k
buzz9961 2 months ago
@buzz9961 Get the 2600k, the future games will support multithreading =3=3
herojohan88 1 month ago
Comment removed
buzz9961 1 month ago
@herojohan88 good idea
buzz9961 1 month ago
He Doesn't Blink!!!! :D
charifield 2 months ago 22
@charifield now entering manual blinking mode:3
DrDerpinstien 2 weeks ago
@charifield 2:51 he did blink
010Ezio 4 days ago
@charifield They edited it out. haha
Justinba1010 2 days ago
I'm getting the Intel Core i5 2500k for my gaming computer.
AMD has nothing even close to it and I actually want good performance.
Droidflute 2 months ago
@Droidflute Dude, go extract porn with your 2500k
TheManMetal 2 months ago
@TheManMetal Dude i'm getting phenom x6 anyways stop being an idiot fan boy...
Droidflute 2 months ago
@Droidflute dude, im not a fanboy, i have my phenom ii x4 overclocked to 3.7ghz, and the intel is only 12% better... and its compared to a 950.
TheManMetal 2 months ago
@Droidflute ooh btw i had a 875k, i sold it because i needed money... but my frames dindt drop that much, bfbc2 it did only drop 3 frames per sec... and i admit that intel is better, but for the money of a 990x, i can buy a: AMD AM3+ FX-6100, Good aftrmarket heatsink, crossfire two 6870´s,
and some noctua fans for good airflow = overclock. and the processor will peform fine, not as good as a 990x but i spend the same and i did get: GFX, FANS, Aftermarket heatsink... you understand me?
TheManMetal 2 months ago 5
@TheManMetal Instead of comparing the 990x, try comparing some similarily priced processors.
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
@TheManMetal You're a moron if you would ever buy a 990x for gaming. The 1100t or 2500k is basically the best you can get. Ya you may get 3+ FPS from a 3960x, but you're a god if you can differentiate the difference, and if you are, you deserve the best.
Orexll 1 month ago
@TheManMetal try overclocking the fx. the fx series are ment to be overclocked
DarkEmoE 3 weeks ago
@DarkEmoE i know :D
TheManMetal 3 weeks ago
@TheManMetal same with amd/ati over nvidia. amd ftw
DarkEmoE 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Droidflute Precisely ^_^ When you have a 200$ CPU that can dominate the world of gaming, even up to the 3960x where it is about 3-5FPS short in 99% of games, plus bundle that with a nice asrock sli mobo for 120$
Why again would i choose AMD? I mean that's cheap as hell...
Orexll 2 months ago
@Droidflute AMD Does Have Better Prossesers Then The I5 Has Some Intel CPUs Are Better But I5 Really I Got 8 Cores And My PC Runs Fine!
ghostsofmudkips 2 months ago
amd: cool'n'quite
intel: always overheat
afieqM 2 months ago
AMD = GAMING, Intel = Extracting Porn... You choose
TheManMetal 2 months ago
@TheManMetal LMFAO
iPh0neADDicT 2 months ago
@TheManMetal Hey hey hey!!! AMD can extract porn just fine!
MMOGODKING 2 months ago
@MMOGODKING THATS TRUE
TheManMetal 2 months ago
AMD no doubt. also not everyone is rich so AMD wins
kamatayan77 2 months ago
@kamatayan77 Why does everyone think Intel is more expensive?
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
y not AMD 69
holdingspace 2 months ago
AMD 4 LIFE!
PhilipTheaker2009 2 months ago
Intel = best performance, expensive as fuck
Amd = lesser performance, not as expensive
novado123 2 months ago
@novado123 Overclock a 1090t to 3.8 and it will perform as good as 980x! and cost like 600 dollars less.
TheManMetal 2 months ago
@TheManMetal No, it will not perform anywhere even close to a stock 980x, or even the MUCH CHEAPER 2600k.
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
@Fortune2point0 dude, im talking about a 6 core fx that actually costs 110 bucks processor vs a intel core i7 980x...
and 2600k is better for gaming but not better for rendering... because in cinebench the 8 core fx processor beats a 2600k because cinebench uses all cores...
man... just admit that, amd is better for the price.
TheManMetal 2 months ago
@TheManMetal Yes, you're comparing a cheap processor to an overpriced one and saying it's better for the price, of course it is. An Athlon dual core has better dollar per frame ratio than anything else out there, but price:performance isn't everything.
And now you're talking about 8 core FX? And Cinebench is a synthetic benchmark, not real-world rendering. In actual rendering applications (3dsmax), and HD video encoding, the 2600k wins (not to mention it OCs better on air/water).
AMD FTL.
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
Oh BTW i got a OLder Intel and NVIDIA rig too so i wanted to Test AMD this Time
And Mine is selfbuilded( no idea how to spell or say )
His is buyed dirctly from
Sony
ThePeacemaker5000 2 months ago
Comment removed
ThePeacemaker5000 2 months ago
@ThePeacemaker5000 ur mate has a shit video card 410mobile<< vs desktop xfx 6850
thats why yours is better if he had a xfx 6850 he would own ur cheap amd
cooldude360MODS 2 months ago
@ThePeacemaker5000 You're comparing mobile parts, which perform worse and are more expensive than their desktop counterparts, to your desktop parts, and using that as a basis for a price:performance argument? Rofl, you're an idiot, kid.
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
@Fortune2point0 ............ ok first im not t stupid i thought about this too and i took 250 euros from the price so that the laptop and pc are ....dontknowthatword compareable? whaterver his coust 750 mine 500 ok ?
ThePeacemaker5000 2 months ago
@ThePeacemaker5000 Yes you are stupid.
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
which is good for gaming
fx 4 core buldozer vs i5 and
fx 6 core buldozer vs phenom II black edition vs i5
4681Naveen 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Man i feel like i have a shitty gaming computer now i have amd :/
TheeXAverageXJoe 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheeXAverageXJoe 2 months ago
LIES ALL LIES YOU KNOW NOTHING NOOB!!! INTELL SUKS.
g2j2008 2 months ago
@g2j2008 intel sucks?!?!you need to learn
buzz9961 2 months ago
hevimetallimias is afraid of discussion so he blocks people.
In his words: retard spotted.
EliteGhost001 2 months ago
WHY THE FUCK DOES PEOPLE NEED TO FUCKING FIGHT OVER THIS?!?!??!
IF YOU DON'T HAVE A LOT MONEY TO PUT IN BUDGET, CHOOSE AMD.
IF YOU GOT MONEY TO PUT CHOOSE INTEL. SIMPLE AS THAT FUCKING RETARDS.
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
@hevimetallimias Amd isn't even making the phenom or athlon series. All of that is discontinued. Its stupid to buy the new bulldozer architecture, its honestly a waste of money. Even the i3-2100 has better performance in gaming than the fx 8150 and is half the price.
Amuffin456 2 months ago
For Intel fanboys, I'm not fanboy off both. I use both but without AMD Intel's prices would be a lot higher, because they would have monopoly. Thank you AMD for keeping prices down:).
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
@hevimetallimias Because AMD is a copy of intel, if you do not remember around 10 years ago amd which was a branch of intel to make cpu's, decided they wanted to make their own cpu's. It is an exact copy, you don't know anything about performance and benchmarking. 90% of all the computers in the world are all intel. Try comparing the fx 8150 to the i5-2500k which is cheaper, the fx loses in almost every scenario and is on the most current "architecture."
Amuffin456 2 months ago
Smart people buy AMD.
Dumb people buy Intel.
xIpodTouchGoeroex 2 months ago
@xIpodTouchGoeroex So are you saying 80% of the world is dumb?
Amuffin456 2 months ago
@FreekshowJeckel The difference between AMD and intel is like the difference between Gibson and Fender or Jim Beam and Jack Daniels.
One is marginally better and you would never notice a difference
But is way more expensive because they are still the best and have such a great reputation.
Standoman6546 2 months ago
amen
jerrylittlemars 3 months ago
i've had two laptops in the past year one with amd and one with intel there both great but i found that if you want to play a game that probibly wont play very well the intel will give up and wont work wheras the amd prosessor will go for it but get very hot (but not shut down) 90 degrees celcius.
No1Chriz 3 months ago
Hmmm. let me ask something.Betwen an Intel dual core (not core 2 quad) and an AMD phenom II X4 that they are the same price, i should buy the Intel Dual Core because its better?
13trigon 4 months ago
@13trigon i5-2500k :)
Amuffin456 4 months ago
@13trigon 4 cores is better..
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
Robots dont blink...WTF:))
13trigon 4 months ago
amd has a great gaming feel to their cpus and gpus.. used amd phenom II x4 @ 3.4 ghz and amd hd 6970 by sapphire and this is a great base for your pc at a price around $460. to get similar performance in a intel and nvidia is a nvidia gtx 580 and intel core i5-760 lynnfield and the price for that is $680 so even if you went to gtx 570 its still about $100 more and the performance is nearly no different.. the reason you would buy that intel setup is because you can say "i have intel"
DFDFusion1 4 months ago
C..........P..........U.........
hahaha!
UltimateWindows1 4 months ago
i started watching the backround because i got tired of waiting for him to blink..
nextgenerationdemon 4 months ago
@TheTangoRepublic nope intel for people who want to be able to use thier pc to its full potential
jackzvid 4 months ago
blink blink blink blink blink i like 2 blink
MrDJRICKYC 4 months ago
BS you can spend around the same for the same performance
thereddog223 4 months ago
i mostly just game on my pc so witch is better for me??
dragonode1 5 months ago
@dragonode1 it depends on what graphic card and processor you are buying. AMD and Intel have both great gaming processors and graphic cards. if you are buying an Nvidia graphic card, than you should buy an intel processor. and if you are getting a ATI or AMD graphic card. than buy an AMD processor because the 2 work better with each other.' ATI/AMD with an AMD CPU has much more processing power than an ATI/AMD with an intel CPU.
bombach007 4 months ago
@bombach007 "they work better with each other" ?? What!? I have an AMD CPU and an Nvidia graphics card and it works great.
T0a5tbr0t 4 months ago
@T0a5tbr0t I didnt say that they will work bad with each other but AMD with AMD is better than AMD with Nvidia same to intel with nvidia than intel and AMD
bombach007 4 months ago
@bombach007 Intel has nothing to do with Nvidia... So with Intel its fucking same do you have ATi or Nvidia GPU. But for ATI/AMD GPU & CPU it works better with Ati GPU & AMD CPU. I still got AMD/ Nvidia and no problems.. IMo the performance is so low percentage between ati/amd so I chose Nvidia.
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
@hevimetallimias First off, AMD video cards and processors do not work better together. Second, Intel is keeping AMD from doing the same thing, so don't forget to thank Intel.
Fortune2point0 2 months ago
I don't prefer any CPU or GPU.
The best thing you can do is match you manufacturers. ATI and AMD, Intel and NVidia. The pro of AMD is that its the best value for money and today, AMD CPU's are not realy slower then Intel
Intel does have some very extreme CPU but would I buy them, with money? no.. I do have an intel atm but that was because then I bought it, AMD had no competetive CPU for it.
I don't realy agree with everything this guy says but there are loads of facts in there.
EliteGhost001 5 months ago
@EliteGhost001 Intel has nothing to do with Nvidia.. OMFG people are dumb.
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
@hevimetallimias
I'm sick of people making RETARDED conclusions. Intel and NVidia don't have anything to do with eachother but AMD and ATI do.
So naturaly, combining AMD with NVidia or Intel with ATI will most likely not get as good results as AMD & ATI.
NOT STOP BEING A F*CKING RETARD AND PISS OFF!
EliteGhost001 2 months ago
@EliteGhost001 Yeah, at which did I say that ATI/AMD wouldn't have anything to do together?... Learn to read and shut the fuck up kid. Back to school. Blocked uneducated tard. kthxbye
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
Comment removed
EliteGhost001 2 months ago
@hevimetallimias
And where did I say NVidia and Intel DO have something together. What i said was people should get AMD&ATI because they work better together. That leaves Intel with NVidia. Now stop trying to sound smart and go cry in a corner.
EliteGhost001 2 months ago
I'm broke. AMD wins!
bayonet14 5 months ago 16
@4232267 Ivybridge LoL
Amuffin456 5 months ago
@4232267 In total performance regardless of price which one would you buy? Intel or amd. Obviously in performance intel dominates over amd, but for price people would buy an amd processor.
Amuffin456 5 months ago
@4232267 You can't get an equilvlent cpu on amd.........sorry :D
Amuffin456 5 months ago
@Amuffin456 Retarded fanboy spotted. I got both Intel & AMD setup. And to be honest. I would chose with money... I dont give a damn fuck if some CPU dominates other but the dominator one costs a fcuking 1000+ euros or dollars.. Tbh thats retarded to pay that much for a fucking CPu for gaming.. I hate fanboys so fucking much. Blocked btw.
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
@hevimetallimias The i5-2500k is a great example of your stupidity. The 2500k costs cheaper than the fx 8150 and has better performance than it. It also has higher performance than anything on amd's side.
Amuffin456 2 months ago
@4232267 Nvidia, cough cough. Also amd gpu's run better on intel platforms.....sorry :D
Amuffin456 5 months ago
@4232267 6 cores 12 threads vs 6 cores 6 threads....sorry :D Also phenom 1100t isn't even compared to the i7-2600k, it is compared to the i5-2500k. Where the 2500k destroys the phenom 1100t.
Amuffin456 5 months ago
bias review.
MrKillswitch1698 5 months ago
lol it's ironic because amd is more flexible.
MrKillswitch1698 5 months ago
AMD=Gameing and multi tasking
Intel=servers
mrinsanegamer101 5 months ago 2
This dude looks like he is in the Maffia...
mattdub07 5 months ago
AMD- Any kind of gamer
Intel- Power computing
For a common consumer should always pick AMD, Intel is for business
Rsslone112039 5 months ago
@Rsslone112039 ya intel is for business but mostly for servers
mrinsanegamer101 5 months ago
AMD = Chuck Norrs
INtel = Justin bieber
TheVeisonchen 5 months ago 15
@TheVeisonchen it depends on the product itself. AMD and Intel are both companies and making products, AMD has some better products than intel and intel has some better products than AMD. if you are getting an ATI/AMD GPU than get an AMD CPU. if you are getting and Nvidia GPU than get a Intel CPU better because the too work better with each other. you are just being a fanboy. you ever looked at the AMD Radeon HD 6990? go search it and see how many people are complaining about that GPU.
bombach007 4 months ago
is it save to overclock the cpu?
adrianfaisal96 5 months ago
@adrianfaisal96 kinda but be careful know what your doing.
ThePresD 5 months ago
dee4doa 5 months ago
@dee4doa why call us rich bastards? rich people mostly go to school , go to work and earn real money :/
CrASYmUZIk 5 months ago
@CrASYmUZIk you have got a point
TheFR3SHINATOR 5 months ago
what's up with the screen behind you.what's the nacher pichers r doing in technology video and
AMD cpu r out of bugs i mean when i install games and software some it stucks and application wont start ,i install race driver grid game when i start thegame it goes on infinite loading scren so i did was in the asus bios i disable the 1 core the game runs fine i am not on AMDside orINTEL but when thay make many CPU they make many issues when issues r there the game developer switch 2 the console side
max7159 6 months ago
I am wrong in saying that Intel have blocked overclocking unless you pay unlock the cpu
peterdoa1 6 months ago
high price = high performance
low price = just fine.. ^^
grozenko 6 months ago
let me enlighten you guys. I work at a computer store and i do know which CPU's are better. For people who want average performance i reccomend AMD, for people who really enjoy computers and know alot about computers, go for intel because its more powerfull. If your a pro gamer get Intel if you want average games go AMD. I personnaly prefer intel.
Xboxfanftw 6 months ago 18
@Xboxfanftw
I agree with that mostly. Usually Intel is known for higher performance than AMD howeverI myself am using an amd in my current build and it is fine for gaming. this build is a gaming build with a low budget so i went with and amd quad core and a nice water cooler for it. then went with the 6970 for my build. Honestly gaming wise cpu does matter but you have to remember that intel hd integrated graphics aren't great for gaming. I know that if a person is a pro gamer they... TBC next
TangoIVIango 4 months ago
@TangoIVIango
Probably have a bigger budget but i was limited so instead of spending a lot on a higher end cpu and less on the gpu I would do it the other way. lower end cpu to gpu for better gaming.
TangoIVIango 4 months ago
@Xboxfanftw Your comment makes no fucking sense at all... I got AMD & I don't play games at average. Graphsdriver is more needed for driect x games.. I got GTX 570 & AMD Phenom X4 965 and everything runs perfect fps with high settings.
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
@gkarv1 Also did you just made these lies up in your head just like that? Watch reviews and benchmarks and you'll notice that you're very wrong, I wouldn't buy i 990x nor 980x, BUT they are way ahead of phenom six cores, I mean you just can't compare them either in price or in performance... Even if phenom six core was running at 5GHz and 990x on stock (3,4GHz) it would be still faster... Intel can keep the prices up high because AMD doesn't have competitor against Intel's high end CPU's.
Dex1n 6 months ago
@gkarv1 Bulldozer will be interesting, maybe it'll be able to beat Sandy Bridge, but nah not Ivy bridge.
Dex1n 6 months ago
@gkarv1 They aren't even near in terms of performance... Yes, i7 980X and i7 990X cost a lot, but those who want only the best don't care about the price... even 2nd gen i5 4 cores rick roll Phenom six core in almost everything, especially in gaming and they cost about the same. Check benchmarks. i7's on the other hand are way ahead phenom of six cores, but they cost more. You get what you pay for. Only desperate fanboys claim otherwise. Low budget = AMD, High end build = Intel, simple as that.
Dex1n 6 months ago
i cant wait till bulldozer comes out... im buying one the day it comes out :D
randrewm97 6 months ago
I notice here that everyone here is a AMD fan, maybe because intel fans don't look up reviews.
TheSemperXFi 6 months ago
The money I save by buying AMD can be used to buy a new AMD instead of overclocking it...if the Socket happens to be the same, that is.
BanditGN77B 6 months ago
I wish CPUs vere like GPUs.. Imagine Asus intel core i7 with better fan and overclocking speeds? :) And so on haha.
alancik123 6 months ago
@alancik123 Lmao :D
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
@alancik123 Yeah good idea, but to be honest that would ruin quality for both of them lmfao. Intel & AMD.
hevimetallimias 2 months ago
Plus dat AMD processors have a high temperature without cooler, so they use they WHOLE performance!
teeo0 6 months ago
Well, AMD is waaaaaaay better than Intel, however, Intel has beaten AMD with the performance of Intel Core I3, I5 and I7, but, anyway, a dual core AMD processor is still very performant and has a low price in comparison with the new Intel processors. For example, I have a 500 bux PC wit an AMD Athlon II Dual Core 3.2GHz, 4GB RAM DDR3, 500GB HDD and NVidia GeForce GTS 450 Video Card 1GB DDR5. The processor was very cheap and I can run CoD Black Ops at a decent performance, so get an AMDprocessor!
teeo0 6 months ago
i was giving him a staring competition ...... he won :(
theminilotus 6 months ago
AMD loves costumers, Intel loves money.
bg048 6 months ago
Performance=Intel. My i5 2500k @4.5ghz is a monster for $200.
BASSxACE 6 months ago
can you blink ??
grozenko 6 months ago 58
@grozenko dude u ain't lying he doesn't blink lol
Trooppaa 6 months ago
Ow lol ... i whana see AMD and intel work together O_O i wonder what will they do with they'r knows .... Well maybe in the future where there will be like flying trains maybe there will always be AMD and intel and maybe they will work together and they'r processors and stuff will be the best .. just personal thinking xD
Justwolflover 6 months ago
Thanks for the info now i know what to be looking for
eddiebug1 7 months ago
i can afford intel if i want but i like my amd cpu and i like to save money and my six core cpu is perfect for gaming and video editing
bambinosto 7 months ago
I have an AMD system and a Intel system. Same price and same performance.
notasnice 7 months ago
Whats the best make of motherboard?
MaMattiP 7 months ago
@MaMattiP Asus, Gigabyte.
kvn864 7 months ago
i don't know why people are fanboys for each different processor. its not like you work for them. you're buying a processor for a computer. why argue about it? bunch of children.
greenland360 7 months ago
Fuck I just bought i5 2500k for 211 bucks from ebay. Thats pretty cheap for such a hardware.
luckyStrike89ru 7 months ago
Intel always wins, no doubt.
luckyStrike89ru 7 months ago
@luckyStrike89ru Does Intel have 12 and 16 core processors? What about good processors and motherboards for under $100? Hm?
IAmSomeoneOrOther 7 months ago
@IAmSomeoneOrOther intel always wins by quality. And quality products always cost more.
luckyStrike89ru 7 months ago
@luckyStrike89ru Alienware and Mac vs. ASUS. Your statement has been proven incorrect.
IAmSomeoneOrOther 7 months ago
@IAmSomeoneOrOther I dont know how that is even related to CPU chips..... so go figure.
luckyStrike89ru 7 months ago
@luckyStrike89ru It wasn't meant to be, you said "And quality products always cost more". Which, in the statement I made, was incorrect.
IAmSomeoneOrOther 7 months ago
@IAmSomeoneOrOther I maybe used mac like couple of times, but never owned one so I wouldnt know. Its logical that higher quality products cost more due to that it costs more to actually manufacture them.
luckyStrike89ru 7 months ago
thanks for the info....
DWEnvision 7 months ago
Intel
doublegrapefruit 7 months ago
:O The bulldozer CPU's have 8 CORES :D
GeekofTechs 7 months ago
Intel is for fools. Just wait for Bulldozer. Long live AMD!!!
ZamatoElite 7 months ago
Trust me, a i7 Extreme 4.0 Ghz CPU make an X6 look like shit.
drums335 7 months ago
As of now AMD's top of the line processor is $189, Intel's is $1000(newegg prices). Now how fucked up would it be if something that was $1000 wasn't as good as something that was $200? The real question should be... Is it worth $800 more? In my opinion, fuck no. I can build a whole gaming rig for $800... a good gaming rig.
XxGRIZZWALDxX 7 months ago
I DONT HAVE THE MONEY FOR A 1000 DOLLERS I7 COMPARED TO A 200 DOLLER PHENOM X6
flamingarse1 7 months ago
@flamingarse1 Get a $200 i5 2500k and it's lightyears better than any phenom ii x6
venomblade891 7 months ago
@venomblade891 and by lightyears you mean a marginally noticealbe increase in performance raise because i know that when people say lightyears there eather getting paied to say it or they dont know what there talking about
flamingarse1 7 months ago
@flamingarse1 benchmarks don't lie man.
venomblade891 7 months ago
@venomblade891 yae but lightyears is saying you would benchmark and it would be on the list if it was lightyears i would expect it to be running at 1 thz so if you saying rhe benchmark said lightyears then yae the benchmark is lieing right to your face that benchmark is giving you its bag of black lies
flamingarse1 7 months ago