Added: 2 years ago
From: LjubishaSrb
Views: 556,158
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,398)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is not SU-35 this is Starscream !!! xD

  • go russia

  • very big plane how are you hiding it or do you plane to fight some you cant seee lolololol

  • they will get shot down just like evry plane on earth . they all copys usa rador hider but that is ok usa has new stuff now you think you are seeing a bird lol

  • my b rusha should worry about the nuklar subs leaking rad in to the sea and not buld new planes yyy you guys are sad

  • Отличный клип.. спасибо

  • Egyptians are with all of you Russians

  • BIG BRO OF INDIA FUCK YAH .

  • quero ver alguma aeronave americano manobrar assim, eu duvido muito, se não fizeram isso até hoje, não fazem mais.

  • Comment removed

  • Flyng is in the blood, super russian exsperience, awesome maneuvre

  • The F22 Raptor take this plane for dessert..

  • Would love to see the Su-35 and F15 lock horns in a dog fight.

  • FLANKERS are like bad-boys of the sky -__-

  • WE ARE RUSSIAN, WE COULD WIN WAR WITH AMERICAN

  • @miamiviceph1 You could, if nuclear weapons aren't used. There is no winners then.

  • I LOVE RUSSIA

  • buhahahaha good joke with this rocket :D:D:D:D really funny :D

  • Comment removed

  • RUSSIAN ENGENEERING FTW!!!

  • I fly on this everyday...in bf3

  • RUSSIA melhor do mundo salve( RUSSIA salve BRASIL) funk EUA,UK,ISRAEL

  • @elberfmmacedo fuNk? lol cara....

  • @murilokyon lol cara....???

  • @murilokyon obrigado,erei era fuck,valeu amigo rsrs

  • @elberfmmacedo vc escreveu FUNK eua, uk e israel, mas acho que vc queria dizer FUCK...

  • @murilokyon obrigado amigo e isso mesmo fuck,rrrrrrrrr,valeu ...chega de funk me enlouquece,me confunde não gosto mais nada contra ,valeu.

  • @murilokyon funk... fuck... tudo a mesma coisa eahuaehuaehuae a gente entendeu ele heheheh

  • @elberfmmacedo arab union are with you !

  • @Wanted19922009 arab union are with

  • Sexy planes! Too bad that the most sexy toys are made for warfare, for killing, for destruction. DAMN, I sounds like a freaking tree hugger....

  • I liked the video before it actually started. Reason: there's "Russian" in the title.

  • Russian can counter attack u.s.

  • @miamiviceph1 and u.s can counter russia. your point?

  • LOL for some reason i aced my data management presentation project while listing to this music xD

  • impressive planes the only problem there are so few that they are not even consider a factor

  • @6308281

    Hitler thought same about T-34.Tube isn't credible insight into RuAf.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog The T-34 was a cheap tank to produced and germany was not prepared for the sheer numbers that kept coming in even thou they knocked out hundreds of them - Unfornunatly the SU don't have that luxury - so this is why they will never be a factor any where - just like the T72s were never a factor anywhere

  • @6308281

    Yawn. Another idiot. In 92 Russian Su-27s visited Virginia and defeated F-15s. The US knew then it needed the ATF (F-22). And the T-34 is regarded by many as the best tank of the war and was better than anything until the Panther which was a copy. You think the T-72 was shit because under equiped export version performed badly with shit crews but when Germany and US got their hands on a Soviet T-72 it could not be penetrated with existing ammo hence the M829A2 was developed.

  • @Internetbutthurt Hmm why are the monkey version is always brought up - And wgere is there a instance when any su-27s have been a factor -F15 have been shooting down all types of Russian junk for years with not one ever shoot down - T72 has failed in Checyne, Middle East that a look at the destroyed tanks - maybe your saying the T72s used in the war in Checyna were Monkey Versions too - Failed you guys are a joke

  • @6308281

    no F-15 ever shot down a flanker family in any combat

    i'm a F-15 lover 2 but fact is a fact in red flag Indian SU-30's pretty much destroyed all of there American opponents of course Indians were using Israeli made Radars on there planes !

    for a T72 i still agree with you that American M1A1 is way better then a smoky T72 but in Iraq most of the tanks where hits by hell fires and rest didnt had any untiarmor weaponry and shells as for Checyne nearly 90% were destroyed by aircrafts

  • @babakchalangi dont see good posts on forums like that very often ).

    T-72 is def. not comparable , especially when in Iraqi's hand.

  • @Misha607552

    so your saying iraqis cant operate the T72?

    Russians have the real T72, all other countries get export versions and btw, Iraq had to fight against 33 countries where the USA used its highest technology of that time, most iraqi tanks were not destroyed by m1a1 abrams but by hellfire missiles cause the iraqi air force was having air incapibility cause of the coalition air superiority.

    your being a bit of a racist

  • @TuRkmEnOkaN .. point taken - i withdraw my opinion )

  • There's SU-35BM and Su-35UBM

  • @phadil Russia isn't even using the Su-35BM, they're using the Su-35S.

    And there is no such thing as a Su-35UBM, there's a Su-35UB.

    Don't use BF3 as your research guide :/

    BF3 is NOT a realistic game anyway. Especially when it comes to the aircraft.

  • Выгледит намного эфектнее F18

  • наикрасивейший самолет! Да и самый лучший! Вообще люблю всю линейку самолетов на базе су 27!!!!

  • ЗА РУСЬ МАТЬ ВАШУ ! =)

  • Comment removed

  • another retarded deathmatch in the comments.

  • I think this "57" dislike till now, are from some Idiots from Lituania, Georgia and some idiots from usa.

  • @al3osfoor stop hating lil bitch just because usa gots the best jet fighters and airforce

  • Все окличут прифронтовую авиацию, защищают родину!!

  • why there's black smoke coming out from the Flanker engine?, i see that in all Russian jet fighters btw!.

  • горькая правда для американцев: Российская военная авиация самая лучшая в мире!!!

  • Для каких единоросно-педеральных дебилов это видео? Хотя, если ракета тоже с автоваза, то доплеровский датчик мог и не сработать.

  • @kampf19 это видео для РОССИЯН, для тебя не здесь, для тебя там где про f-16.

  • Don't get me wrong...this plane is very sexy and I would love to own one....I just wouldn't want to try to go up against our airforce in it.

  • Есле набежали пендосы на выложено видло и так яро интересуются, дискуссируют - это говорит только об одном! что очкуют ребята!! у них ведь нет еще пока подобного!! есть конечно F22 но он сосет по многим показателям!! Слава России!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • lol feel like flying this plane xD

  • Сколько тупых американцев набежало. Да, у нас самые лучшие самолеты, у нас самые лучшие корабли, танки, межконтинентальные ракеты. У нас самая высокая культура. И еще, у нас самые красивые в мире женщины!

    А ты американец трахай своих страхоёбищь!

  • @Kurmandbal молодец. Полностью с тобой согласен. И ещё добавлю, что насмешки с их стороны, злость и ненависть к России, это осознание ими нашего превосходства над америкой и их бессилие это изменить.

  • In Serbia on the earth included microwaves without doors. (It is a lot of false targets). Planes marked this false radiation and let out there rockets. (The plane of finds out when directs at the purpose the rockets). Simultaneously they were marked by the present land rockets and shot on them. So has been brought down F117

  • in soviet russia jet flys you

  • Great video! i have taken a recent interest in this russian jet! :)

  • Очень надежный самолет класса 4++

  • it is the most beautiful air jet i have ever seen

  • man i love this plane in BF3 :D

  • damn has to be the most maneuverable plane ever made xD

  • Pavcon do you really think I care if you blocked me? What's the matter,can't come up with any amazing facts to back up the fact that your biased opinions have no place in reality? The facts point out that US pilots blew Russian planes out of the sky every time they saw them with little to no losses.I'm sorry if you are all butthurt and can't accept that.Like I said..read my comments beforehand and you might look like less of an ass.Eastern eurotrash like you make me laugh.What are you a Serb?

  • i am german and i really like russia. cool people. high developed country.

  • go russia

  • nice CGI..all choppy and looking like something my 12 yr old neice could do on her i-Mac. brilliant propaganda but lacking in factual reality. hopefully we will never have to find out how the US vs Russia airial war would actually turn out...but on the bright side we might get to see how we do as partners against China if things don't change soon

  • Russian's can kill 250 millions Americans RIGHT NOW! Instantly! SO u all just can STFU! You and yours radar's and planes etc.... If just one of ur crapy f's attack Russians !

  • @cte4dota so bring it on! and you will see

  • @cte4dota ok jack ass then the u.s. will kill 150 million russians after you do that... you really think a attack like that will go unanswered.... get you head out of your ass.

  • Neat. 'Mirror Wars' belongs to the three worst movies I've ever seen, only bought it because of this pile of glorious russian heavy metal awesomeness shown here.

    I can recommend 'Sky Fighters' though, it's a french flick, awesome Mirage 2000 footage, an actual storyline and better chicks (well, as I mentioned - french :-).

  • Ово нама треба...И ништа више. Поздрав из Србије...

  • Comment removed

  • Восхищаюсь его маневренностью:)

  • это су 33 или су 37

  • f-22 not even americans are planning to buy more of those shitty planes, it holds the record to be the american plane with more malfunctions and problems, and well all the the world know that russian airforce is the the best in the world, even those planes from back in the cold war are better than those from the xxi century american ones, just as simple as russian pilots are better trained than americans, russian aircrafts are that good that they just upgrade them insted of developing new ones

  • @rikrdolevy LOL UR funny.

  • @rikrdolevy Have you looked up the combat record of how many Russian "advisors" we killed during Vietnam and Korea ? How about how many kills the USAF and Navy have racked up in global conflicts since Vietnam ? Despite all the great stunt pilots your country seems to produce, the actual fact is that Russians haven't fought a significant air conflict in 50 years so you actually have no clue how your mighty airforce would fare against a highly trained cadre with modern aircraft

  • @surfgodx every country can slaim whatever they want.. US are the best in propaganda.. wake up . .get outside your stupid borders.. you are not the center of the world.and definetely you are not the best in everytihgn.. idiot

  • @pavcon Did I say we were the best at everything dipshit,look at my comment again before you go flapping your cocksucker.Go count the scrap metal that used to be Russian fighters planes littering the middle east.My point was the Russian airforce hasn't fought anyone since WWII. The idea that they have the best planes and the best fighter pilots is laughable. I've been outside our borders, and have met interesting people from many different countries.Can you say the same?Now who's the idiot?

  • @pavcon Oh I'm sorry. I totally forgot about the magnificence of your airial bombing of Chechnya and dropping bombs on the civilians of Georgia. My bad...I guess you guys really are as badass as you think you are

  • @surfgodx idio.. I'm no russian.. but I have experience from both sides.. nooblet.. you are just an "american patriot" which in real terms there is no such thing that can't see the truth.. ooh.. and you are blocked

  • @surfgodx oh yes vietnam... as far a i know the US got its ass kicked, could u tell me how many Sukhoi, MIG, Yakolev, Tupolev, or whatever have the US knocked off ?? gime numbers if u r that sure about what u r saying. What u say is true about the russians havent fought a significant confict, but lets be honest how many have the us fought by themselfts they always get into conflicts as NATO, backed up by other nations, the russians scared the shit out of the US in the coldwar

  • @rikrdolevy Well according to global security.net during the Gulf War the US alone shot down 4 Mig-21s, 8 Mig-23s,2 Mig-25s,5 Mig 29s,4 Su-17s, 2 Su-22s,and 2 Su-25s....all without losing a single plane to enemy aircraft. We shot down 2 Mig-23's in Libya, and 3 Mig 29s in the Kosovo war..again without any losses. I know these weren't piloted by Russians who might have at least shot down one of our planes. Vietnam definitely was an assfuck for America until we started using F-4Gs.

  • If arabs and USAF changed their plains, result would be the same. That was not about equipment.

  • @surfgodx Read this docs b23.ru 3brp (insert / after .ru). It in Russian, please use google translate. There was a lot of downed aircraft for various reasons. Or this link b23.ru 3bra, where Serbian forces was shot down F-117. From another point of view of U.S. war with countries with no effective and modern air defense systems, so these small losses.

  • @Lorikf9 ARe you saying that Iraq and Serbia din't have "effective and modern air defense systems" because that's not true. And the F-117 that was shot down was due more to human error than Russian technology.

  • @TheTequilaShooter Exactly. Serbia have mostly Mig-21 and J-22. Its old aircrafts 60-70s. Or ground AD S-125 Neva/Pechora (1968). It's new armament? About F117 there are many different opinions. I hear he was shot down Soviet surface-to-air missile which was designed in 60s. I'm just wanted to say that US had a loss aircraft in wars, unlike @surfgodx.

  • @Lorikf9 okay,we're cool. Nam was horrible for the US. We lost more aircraft from SAMs than fighter jets. We also lost 2 F-15's to SAMS in Iraq so it does happen. No aricraft is invisible nor prone to getting shot down. It's always a cat and mouse game trying to outwit the opponent. C ya.

  • @Lorikf9 I I know we lost a F-117 to AA fire (the F-117 is called the Wobbly Goblin,it's a horribly unstable plane and has to fly straight to bomb even stationary targets). MY point is that in the wars we have fought and come up against Russian made planes, we have shot down squadrons of planes without losing a single one of ours.the Israelis,using U.S. planes have shot down a ton more.and the Iraqis had the MOST extensive and modern AA net that they could buy.. and were wiped out anyways

  • Comment removed

  • @surfgodx Shooting down MiG-21 with F-15 Does not count boy. Those arabs can't even afford good russian stuff.

  • @spanish111japan nor have the same skills :P ugh 6 day war was a slaughter but then again they were exposed by CIA...all airbases and their timings

  • @spanish111japan yeah..then I guess it's a good thing there were also MiG29s and SU-25s.bad troll... go back under your bridge

  • @spanish111japan It is better combat experience than what Russia has.

    And even then, in Operation Rimon 20, Soviet pilots used their own MiG-21's to go against the Israeli's and still lost.

  • @franknbeans4761 Well, of course. Russians aren't war hungry bastards.

    In OR 20, the F-4 and Mirages were obviously more well used than the MiGs, as the Israelis were and are dangerous pilots.

    But still, the MiG-21 is far supperior than those. It is considered the best 2nd generation fighter. For a reason, it is still used.

  • @spanish111japan So what, the F-4 is still used, too. It is well known that the Mig 21 is very difficult to fly. Indians even call them the flying coffins. In Nam, the Vietnamese had very few Mig 21's and they tried to avoid the F-4's, if possible. The US pilots in one exercise called Operation Linbacker fooled the Migs by pretending that they were Thuds and the Phantoms shot down such a large number that the migs were never a threat for the remainder of the war.

  • @asusucks Actually, in Operation Linbacker, it was the United States wich suffered most casualities. USA=77,% of Losses (claimed by USA)

    Vietnam=79%

    Leveled rivals

    Early versions are considered second-generation jet fighters, while later versions are considered to be third-generation jet fighters

    The MiG-21, compared to the F-4 haves better agility, and of course, a considerable speed to catch it.

    The F-4 Phantom used ECM pods, that doesn't make the claim for the F-4, but for the extra ECM.

  • @spanish111japan Where did you get your info regarding Operation Linebacker because I know in the air war the statistics are overwhelmingly in the US's favor? Yes, the Mig was more maneuverable, but the Phantom was much more powerful. I believe the F-8 had the best kill/death ratio in Nam. The F-4's shortcomings were actually a blessing for the US. We came to the realization that a better superiority fighter was needed, and that resulted in the F-15.

  • @asusucks Wikipedia, stating claims by Vietnam and USA (Obviously, two Whining children claiming victory).

    In the Air, Statics can be favorable to USA, depending of the Pilots, Aircraft, Weapon, Weather, and Much more.

    The MiG I belive was slower, but more manoubravle. Meanwhile, Phantom was Faster, but was less manoubravle, that makes them both pretty good and similar in air.

    Our response was the SU-30, shown supperior to the F-15 on red flag

  • BTW, The creation of the F-15 resulted in Russia's making of the Su-27.

  • @asusucks My friend you still our plane and make a bad copy of it called F-15. Russia was always making its own way in plain making & USA is the one who always was trying to get in to our plain technology half of your plains was build on stuff stolen from us, how dare you can blame us in copying you guys after all.

  • @zelibober What did the F-15 copy? If you're like many other Russians &think the Mig 25 you're wrong. F-15 plans were made long before the US ever saw the Mig. In fact, the F-15 is a completly different fighter. The Mig 25 is an interceptor while the Eagle is an air-superioirty fighter. Both have different missions. + if you do some research you'll fine that there are even rumors that the USSR copied the A-5 Vigalante, the prototype twin tail version that was built for the USN.

  • @asusucks I wasn't arguing, i was telling the facts. Whole country are made of emigrants from different countries which are the engine of the country it self. Even if you call your self Americans you are about 25% Russians, but lets get back to main point which is to get all good stuff from the world and bring it to US. If someone in the world invent something very good USA will do what ever it has to take it. So it is impossible to copy what you copy from us earlier.

  • @zelibober I understand your point. You're right, we are a land of immigrants, including myself. My grandparents from both my mother and father came from Europe. America is a very young and diverse nation. I think 25% Russian figure of yours is a little high, though. Germans were in Russia, too hepling their space program. Look it up. Both Russia and the US benfited greatly from German technology.

  • @asusucks America has a bad ass trick, they usually not copying invention, then are bring the inventor in US and then tell that they invented this caz that person live in US. Whole space program was built by Germans. And every one say it was race to the moon between Russians and Americans but in real it was race to the moon between Russians and Germans in America, Same with plains, nuclear bomb etc

  • @asusucks

    Bzzt. Wrong. The F-15 was a response to the Mig-25 which was believed to be a super-fighter. It was breaking records left and right and still holds many. The design of the F-15 was born from the arrival of the MiG-25. The US didnt know that it was an interceptor initially. Its widely acknowledged. You should do your research.

  • @Internetbutthurt LOL Do a little research and you'll find the the F-15 design plans were a result of needing an air-superiority fighter , which is not like the Mig 25. The design plans for the F-15 wree way in advance before the Mig 25 landed in japan. And, if you really want to play stupid games, the mig 25 looks more like the US twin-tailed A-5 Vigalante. It is not '"widely" knowledged - you're fust a Russian fanboy that beleives in gossip columns.

  • @asusucks God you yanks are such losers. You haven't won anything for the last 100 years! So who are you to dictate?

  • @clusterfak BS Why don't you tell me what war we haven't won, besides Nam, and I'll show you how stupid you are? And, if you don't agree with a specific comment of mine speak up pussy and I'll prove you wrong!

  • @zelibober HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *wipes tears away from laughing so hard* I needed a good laugh. That was the best joke I've read in weeks

  • @asusucks OK I hate to break into the love fest here but the time line went like this. N. Vietnamese with Russian advisors show up with MiG-15s and MiG-21s and woop ass on our F-4s because first run Phantoms had no guns and relied on AIM 7 Sparrow radar guided missile which was horrible,didn't lock and had 50/50 chance of not exploding when it did lock. U.S. adapts and creates F-4G which has internal cannon and can use the AIM 9 sidewinder which is heat seeking...game over.

  • @surfgodx I agree that the US was pretty stupid to not arm the F-4's w/ guns early on. That's one reason why the F-8 was so successful. Fortunately, the N. Vietnamese didn't have many Mig 21's. You're right about the Sparrow. It sometimes failed to lock on, often fell from the rail w/o motor igniting, failed to explode, etc. Sidewinders did better but they still had their own problems, too.

  • @asusucks It was arrogance...the HNIC decided that the days of dogfights were over and that our missiles would ensure total air superiority since the Russians literally had no active guided missiles of any kind.The kill to death ration pre F-4E was like 5:1 in favor of N Vietnam, after we released F-4E with cannon and Sidewinder went to like 11:1 in favor of the U.S....so even if the Sidewinder had issues it was superior to anything else in the air and the cannons gave us the chance to dogfight.

  • @surfgodx N. Vietnames start running out of experienced pilots due to attrition and quits sending sorties against the F-4s and tries to concentrate on F-105s. Operation Linebacker was based SOLEY on the F-105 and used F-4s as CAP screen to save them from MiGs

  • @surfgodx Correction...the F-4E had the first cannon, the F-4G was the Wild Weasel and used anti radar missiles (for taking out SAMs)

  • @rikrdolevy Oh and another thing... all those kills we racked up, most of them were your "elite" 4th generation Russian aircraft flown by pilots trained by Russians.

  • Ну че пиндосы, труханули?

  • don't compare to the f22 the f22 is dead canceled same fate as commanche

    i didn't work in raing coulden't comunicate with other planes was too expensive

    has never seen combat look it up :-)

  • @PressyTCN hahaha another Rusky troll, im a send you some links. Rain has no affect for a fighter that flys in wet n Humid florida, scorching nevada desert and freezing Alaska, if its cancelled then why is it in service today in airbases across the U.S and Japan? and it can communicate with every U.S aircraft since its strong radar can lock onto targets from long range and through sytem link it can launch missiles at the target from the ground or allied fighters.

  • the Comanche was never taken in to service the f-22 is in service with 185 active right now no more will be made.

  • its Су-37

  • @Russia2010 Seriously, why do you keep bringing up that Aussie site when i sent you an official RAND link shooting down the Aussie press.

  • What is with all this hate between Russians and Americans? You're both on the same side

  • @RoyalAviator I have no idea why they keep bringing this up either? Russians and Americans will probably be on the same side during the war against China-Sino-Ind bloc. I would love to see a simulated air battle between Russian and American fighters "Top Gun" style like we train. I think the show would be one of the coolest things ever with vectored thrust and power to weight ratios of our respective jets. In the name of remaining "#1" I don't think either of our military leaders would allow it

  • Right now id say Americas greatest power is her Allies. Weve been fighting together since ww1. You dont just take on the states by herself, you take us all on.

  • "We have liftoff" HOT DAMN how I'd like to fly one of these beasts... too bad I'm somewhat blind :'D

    P.S. just because it's built to kill (or rather to protect nations in these newer days) doesn't mean it has to and it doesn't mean its not fun to fly so BUGGER OFF all u haters

  • Italy could buy su-35 instead of the f-35 litter bin

  • @flyblu80 The F-35 is better than F-16, the F-16 defeated SU-35 many times in simulated dog fights held in Turkey.

  • @TH7596 I don't think you'll ever be able to defeat a weapon from Russia.

  • @TheBlindPowerslave So what about all the Russian tanks and aircraft destroyed by Abrahms and the F-15's?

  • @TH7596

    what about shit abrams destroyed by russian rpg-7? what about ya harriers in vietnam shooted down by russian r-71? this is russian technology (helmet with vision aiming + fire and forget missiles).

    cmon biatch stop talk to me, i really really hate stupid morons like u!

  • @TH7596 What Russian tanks? You mean the T-54 used by Iraqis? Don't be such a dumb fuck, new equipment from Russia obliterated US weapons in Georgia.

  • @TheBlindPowerslave "Russia obliterated US weapons in Georgia" What US weapons? We provided them w/ comm gear. Shit, Russia couldn't even use smart bombs effectively in Georgia, and had literally no SEAD operations and lack of communcations where cell phones were used. LOL

  • @TheBlindPowerslave What U.S weapons obliterated on Georgia?? Tell me please, Fucking Georgians retreaded, Russian BMP-2 vs Humvees doesn't count ''DUMB FUCK".

  • @TH7596 Then why do you compare 4th gen. soviet jets vs 5th gen. American jets? Dumb fuck.

  • @TheBlindPowerslave F-16 is 4thgen. If you had a clue, you would see that all the videos are made by Russians trying to compare 4th gen USSR jets to U.S jets. Smart one.

  • @TH7596

    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

    stupid yankshithead! who said that? ya yank moron school?:D:D:D:D

    READ THIS UP MOTHERFUCKER!

    ausairpowerDOTnet/APA-NOTAM-05­072010-1DOThtml

  • @Russia2010 Before you try calling people stupid you should take a real good look at yourself. rand(DOT)org/news/press/2008/0­9/25.html

  • @Russia2010 I know for a fact the my F-16 can beat the BS SU aircraft, everything you hear about them is lies and everything you see at an SU airshow is fake as the aircraft are not the same that are used in combat, they are specially modded aircraft for. ALL SHOW, NO GO....Comprende???

  • @TH7596

    ya f-16 (just a copy of russian MiG-21) can nothing, but only fuck up against russian jets! Are u stupid to read what i posted? or truth hurts so much?

    one day we russian will fuck ameriCUNTS very very hard, like we did it with hitler, for ya fucking crimes around the world. u motherfuckers killed allready around 1 billion ppls for alltime, and ofc should be punished, and we will fuck u whore! very soon!

  • @Russia2010 Just curious, why do you think the worlds airlines including many russian carriers do not fly Tupulovs or Antonovs? The SU 35 is a beautiful airplane and highly capable however the F-35 is moving the air combat paradigm into a different direction. While not completely stealth capable it is very steallthy along with STOL/VTOL capability the F-35 will be capable of deploying throughout the theater of conflict without a base, while the SU-35 is dependent on a runway.

  • @AmericanPatriot53

    i postetd here allready some link. rtfm dude. that reportage is most objective unlike ya american propaganda shit.

    ONCE AGAIN:

    ausairpowerDOTnet/APA-NOTAM-05­­072010-1DOThtml

    enyoj!

  • @Russia2010 Dork, that site you keep using is from Carlo Kopp, an Aussie that has pleaded for the F-22 and not the F-35. His ranting is well known in the defence community. The site you link even brings up Russian AESA radar that still hasn't even been put into service. Meanwhile, the shitty PAK-FA is still having trouble getting its engines built to spec, has poor avionics, and isn't stealthy enough to be considered a 5th generation fighter. You're clueless.

  • @TheTequilaShooter

    jelous cunt, rtfm, son of biatch. read and learn what is radar irbis-e. whatt a crap ameriCUNTS morons omfg!!!!!!!!!!!111111111

  • @Russia2010 HAHAHA The MIG 21 sucks compared to the F-16. From the wings design, iontake nosels, the F-16 being fly-by-wire, etc., it''s completly different moron.

    From Air Chief Marshal Naik in the MMRCA evaluations: "The Air Chief observed that admittedly, the US had the best of the combat radars, weapons and systems." ROFL.

  • @Russia2010 With Russia being such a wonderful place please explain to me why an entire industry has sprung up offering Russian brides to fat old and ugly westerners? Wouldn't they rather marry an attractive younger Russian man?

  • @Russia2010 F-16 a copy of the Mig 21. HAHAHAHA. You're crazy. The F-16 kicks its ass in every way, from A2A, to A2G. US pilots that have flown the Mig 21 laugh that the largest button on the aircraft is the red warning light signaling failure. The bird is hard to fly, has poor ergonomics, and a huge rear blind spot. About the only good thing about it is that it has great ability to slow down w/o stalling.

  • "but only fuck up against russian jets! " I suppose that how the phrase "When Migs fly, Migs die" came up. LOL.

  • @TheTequilaShooter this is a Suikhoi, not a mig

  • @sovietskies69 I know, but the Su still has no edge on the F-22. The Su you see in this vid is a demonstration aircraft without any external stores. Air demo planes have limited avionics, an optimal amount of fuel, and no external ordinace that can limit is manueverablity. The F-22's that you see at airshows perform with a full load of fuel (18000 lbs) and can perform those same manuevers weapons ready. Then you add in that the F-22 is stealth gives the Su no chance.

  • @TheTequilaShooter why do all you Americans compare the SU-35 to the F-22....one is 4th gen the other is 5th gen. I would hope the F-22 could defeat. Its like me comparing the F-18 to the Pak-FA.....

  • @sovietskies69 Would you rather compare the Pak-Fa to the F-22?  Sorry, same result.

  • @TheTequilaShooter in what way? You dont know the full capabilties of Pak-FA because almost no info on it is out and its still under development. Just like the J-20..