@zgoaler20 After the goalie makes a stop, even if the puck is not in his control but he makes the stop(unless it goes past him into the net) the player cannot touch the puck. Next time, read up on your hockey before making stupid comments like this. BOOM!
I totally agree with Rask I was at this game and it was horrible the first one he poked it away and the second hit the post what a dumb call!!!!!!!!!!!
the first river rat goal was awful but the second one, why dont they just watch the fckin replay to see if the shot really hit the post. its just fckin rediculous.
I'm with Tuukka on the 2nd "goal". It makes no geometrical sense for a puck to bounce into the net, and then reflect perfectly backwards in the exact same trajectory. Not that this should even be a debate, it's only logic. I would have fucked up a milk crate too.
@theguywithawierdname The puck could have hit the spot where the post and crossbar meet, or it could have hit the water bottle and went out. Or from the angle he was at the puck could have appeared to have hit the post. I didn't hear any "PING".
@kambelzful He shot top middle, so your first point's all but gone. Second, you didn't hear a PING because the raw audio was drowned out but volume editing and commentary. You didn't hear the milk crate hit the ice either, no Rask fucking up the bords with his stick.
@theguywithawierdname I remember hearing the actual audio after the game was played. I heard no ping. It's inconclusive and the ref would have had the best view of whether it went in or not. Rask wasn't even looking behind him. The only way to tell is if we had a different view.
don't blame the goalie.. ref is a fucken joke.. first goal shouldn't of count, his forward momentum stopped, and 2nd goal should of been reviewed... i really don't blame him at all
@D4TSIK . learn the rules..i agree with you that the first should've counted but you dont understand why...a player stopping is fine its not the forward motion of the player its the forward motion of THE PUCK, now the reason the goal should've been waved off is because he lost control of it
@D4TSIK first of all this is an AHL game this happened to to the Devils except Daniel Briere stopped but as long as you continue to puck handle the shot is good. which the player did
First goal was a misdeke. Player lost control of it and even gave up on the play but fired it after no whistle. Definatly shouldn't have been a goal. Second one was a goal. If the puck hit the post, it would have went straight out. It went in and bounced off a post and netting out. You can tell by the momentum of the puck on its ricochet out of the net. Of course, Rask was pissed about the first one still so reacted off that. Cant say I blame him, its not like anyone here has never lost a temper
Wow, I really can't believe that first one was called a goal. The second one was atleast subjective, but the first was no question. Don't they have video replay?
@vivaportugalhabs starting 29 games in the regular season is a big reason that thomas still had tons of stamina in the playoffs, and brought the cup home baby!!!
first move was utter bullshit, should not have counted as a goal. second shot i couldnt tell where the puck went since its youtube quality, but it looked to hit the post pretty hard and bounce off.
the first one was definitely bullshit, but the second was probably a goal. the ref had a really good look at it, while tuuka probably just heard it catch iron and was already on a short fuse from the first missed call. either way, epic meltdown that makes me laugh every time.
24.2 The puck must be kept in motion towards the opponent’s goal line and once it is shot, the play shall be considered complete. No goal can be scored on a rebound of any kind (an exception being the puck off the goal post or crossbar, then the goalkeeper and then directly into the goal), and any time the puck crosses the goal line or comes to a complete stop, the shot shall be considered complete. The loss of the puck could arguably be viewed as a lateral deke.The second one - too hard to say
first one... what the hell? are these house league refs? do i know you? second one... calm your friggin balls down, rask! what is this, the olympic sport: hockey equipement toss? it was a fair goal (at least i think it was) and even if it was a crossbar no goal, then calm your hormones anyways!
@lecavalier101 It wasnt a fair goal the ref was a complete idiot as ive said a couples lol. I looked it up. he made some pretty bad calls. Id be pissed to and cmon everyone deserves one meltdown at least once in a while ^.^
@xxXRPrince24Xxx The first wouldn't have been a goal because the guy lost control and the puck stopped it's forward momentum. So the whistle should have been blown, no goal. The second one is hard what happened
Yeah, that first shot was bullshit, it came off the forwards stick and he stopped, that should have been whistled dead. The 2nd...I don't get why it wasn't reviewed, but the video isn't clear enough to make a judgement for me as to if it hits the crossbar or not.
The first shot was called a goal??? Holy shit, I should be a ref.. it seems the qualifications aren't too high. Cause I'm pretty sure my 5 year old neighbor who plays in the mites knows that a shootout shot must maintain a forward motion. Pretty sure you can't hook around for a 2nd pass at the net.
If you had a spectacular shutout performance and win ruined by an incompetent referee on two consecutive occasions, you'd be a little mad about it too. Now please stop typing with your forehead.
This has been flagged as spam show
Ilvesläinen
SilzuuX 5 days ago
Ilvesläinen
SilzuuX 5 days ago
Yes sir Rask, thats a strong caracter!! outRAGEous!!!
A6rs6eni6c 1 week ago
Go rask! fucking refs are retarded
TNTFilms14 1 week ago
the first one should count, as the puck and player continued moving forward. Boom!
zgoaler20 1 week ago
@zgoaler20 the puck and player clearly moved back, are you fucking blind?
Vilppy 1 week ago
@zgoaler20 After the goalie makes a stop, even if the puck is not in his control but he makes the stop(unless it goes past him into the net) the player cannot touch the puck. Next time, read up on your hockey before making stupid comments like this. BOOM!
Masterown35 4 days ago
=3
aaanttiii38 2 weeks ago
Thomas is doing a good job on him :D
chimburn 2 weeks ago
fucking referees, i feel you bro' (rask)
Samson61z 3 weeks ago
suprised they didnt show if it was EVEN in or not
Jaredr781 3 weeks ago
Hello! this is kermit "the" frog here.
MrWizzors 3 weeks ago 3
Ihr guckt jetzt keine pornos im unterricht!
TomateZockt 1 month ago
i used to go crazy like that for my boyfriend's cock and the way he'd smear shit over my face. gay lovin can be messy.
MentalEminence 1 month ago
@MentalEminence hawt
rabblewo 1 month ago
i love players who play with feelings
ilovetheflip 1 month ago 2
what the fuck is wrong with AHL and NHL refs? lately they have been fucking ridiculous, ESPECIALLY Tim Peel (worst ref ever)
Thrash469 1 month ago
it DID hit the post :D What a joke
reimond30 1 month ago
A zebra with a whistle in its mouth would've made better calls.
Evnted 1 month ago
@Evnted hmmm white and black stripes....he is a dumb ass zebra
canadiangrlzrock 1 month ago
yeah the ref fucked that one up
montrealcanadiensuck 1 month ago
lol it was post.
TheSkillzkills 1 month ago
nice
cooljas100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@onearthonelegion Why you are saying that? You cant know
MrE22K 2 months ago
I totally agree with Rask I was at this game and it was horrible the first one he poked it away and the second hit the post what a dumb call!!!!!!!!!!!
brady101194 2 months ago
refs the idiot not the goalie. poor goalie :'(
alexburrowsrox 2 months ago
he mad cuz he bad
2girls1freak 2 months ago
@2girls1freak you're an idiot
yopussybitch 2 months ago 3
@2girls1freak hes bling cuz he got a ring
PatrickRoy30 1 month ago
tuukka smash!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
swiftg87 2 months ago
i was at that game
theman921 2 months ago
@theman921 wow can i get an autograph or something?
tope774 2 months ago
Finns are short tempered brutes. Be wary of them.
onearthonelegion 2 months ago
Hey, working in or for Providence will do that to anyone.
Anthraxicus 2 months ago
He had the same reaction when he was drafted by Toronto.
ElBarto3131 2 months ago 36
And he still made it to the Bruins
coyote7272 3 months ago
I remember when this first came on the news, it was hilarious.
DarkstarXbox 3 months ago
tuukka rask goes insane aftere betting on the knicks
Ayeeejosh 3 months ago
the first river rat goal was awful but the second one, why dont they just watch the fckin replay to see if the shot really hit the post. its just fckin rediculous.
CAMTHEMAN1999 3 months ago
HAHAAHAH i love Rask
Durzahh 3 months ago
6-1
oskarzoubou 3 months ago
U mad bro?
PHILLYPHAN5118109 3 months ago
I'm with Tuukka on the 2nd "goal". It makes no geometrical sense for a puck to bounce into the net, and then reflect perfectly backwards in the exact same trajectory. Not that this should even be a debate, it's only logic. I would have fucked up a milk crate too.
theguywithawierdname 3 months ago 3
@theguywithawierdname agreed
Durzahh 3 months ago
@theguywithawierdname The puck could have hit the spot where the post and crossbar meet, or it could have hit the water bottle and went out. Or from the angle he was at the puck could have appeared to have hit the post. I didn't hear any "PING".
kambelzful 3 months ago
@kambelzful He shot top middle, so your first point's all but gone. Second, you didn't hear a PING because the raw audio was drowned out but volume editing and commentary. You didn't hear the milk crate hit the ice either, no Rask fucking up the bords with his stick.
theguywithawierdname 3 months ago
@theguywithawierdname I remember hearing the actual audio after the game was played. I heard no ping. It's inconclusive and the ref would have had the best view of whether it went in or not. Rask wasn't even looking behind him. The only way to tell is if we had a different view.
kambelzful 3 months ago
oh man i love this guy
aplayaz2000 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people want young white females to mix with non-white males.
I made a one-minute video highlighting a very tiny sample of race-mixing advertisements.
I love white people, and I am opposed to race-mixing. But I do not hate non-whites.
If you click on my name “autumntree2011” highlighted in blue below this comment, you can watch my video.
(I'm not a fan of Hitler or KKK.)
autumntree2011 3 months ago
I love that when you type Tuukka Rask in google's search bar the second entry in the auto complete that comes up is Tuukka Rask milk crate.
KillJoy83 3 months ago
I would have murdered that referee.. GO TUUKKA!
Mauro1897 4 months ago
HYVÄ TUUKKA! :DD Suomi perkele!
Viive97 4 months ago
u mad bro
irecatori 4 months ago
you think tuuka's mad now, what if he'd had to stay with the Leafs!!
eoilers96 4 months ago
I've NEVER seen a goalie so truly fucked over. Those refs are idiots.
gdwhat 4 months ago 2
i think he said "VITTU SAATANA"
NordicHero11 4 months ago in playlist Liked 2
On the second goal, you can hear a sound, but it sounds mor elike a puck hitting the boards than the post.
NuclearPotatoSalad 4 months ago
don't blame the goalie.. ref is a fucken joke.. first goal shouldn't of count, his forward momentum stopped, and 2nd goal should of been reviewed... i really don't blame him at all
D4TSIK 5 months ago 90
@D4TSIK Yeah, because you could see so clearly through your Rask-jizz tinted glasses.
lionbaiter 4 months ago
@D4TSIK . learn the rules..i agree with you that the first should've counted but you dont understand why...a player stopping is fine its not the forward motion of the player its the forward motion of THE PUCK, now the reason the goal should've been waved off is because he lost control of it
BlueBlazer89 2 months ago
@D4TSIK first of all this is an AHL game this happened to to the Devils except Daniel Briere stopped but as long as you continue to puck handle the shot is good. which the player did
TheChoo149 4 days ago
how does the ref count the first goal, like wtf is he thinking
aplayaz2000 5 months ago
he doesn't touch the first one. and the second one is debatable. you dont know it didnt go in.
MasonGillis 5 months ago
@MasonGillis ? the player lost control of the puck on the first one. The puck was going away from the net.
Hatchwork 4 months ago
@Hatchwork thats like saying the puck goes away from the net when you do a spinorama.
MasonGillis 4 months ago
55 game suspention
crustytheclown31 5 months ago
First goal was a misdeke. Player lost control of it and even gave up on the play but fired it after no whistle. Definatly shouldn't have been a goal. Second one was a goal. If the puck hit the post, it would have went straight out. It went in and bounced off a post and netting out. You can tell by the momentum of the puck on its ricochet out of the net. Of course, Rask was pissed about the first one still so reacted off that. Cant say I blame him, its not like anyone here has never lost a temper
gerble36 5 months ago 4
Rask giving us evermore reason to hate his personality.
JathanProductions 5 months ago
@JathanProductions likewise
Vilppy 5 months ago
lolumadbro?
GTaowa 5 months ago
in the second goal the ref was like
it was a goal. It was a goal. It was right here, right here, goal, goal, goal
29jeffhardyzboyz 5 months ago
warrior must make strong goalie sticks
MrHockeydudeman 5 months ago
Referee was lucky that it was Rask, normal finnish dude would have break his fucking skull.
MultiJerkku 5 months ago 2
thats what i feel like now that summers coming to an end and going back to school.
hockeywhizkid 5 months ago
Cuz it was sports on the news
DCC1844 5 months ago
SUOMI FINLAND PERKELE !!!
oskariv33 5 months ago
why there is boxing at end?
taikuri936 5 months ago
hyvä suomi!
freerider2crazy 5 months ago 57
0:07 no goal. needs to be continuous motion towards the goal.
CPriceKSteeg310 5 months ago
Wow I feel for Rask. Thats some BS there
LeChatDeNoir13 6 months ago
Wow, I really can't believe that first one was called a goal. The second one was atleast subjective, but the first was no question. Don't they have video replay?
sandmonkey322 6 months ago
@sandmonkey322 there's no video replay on shootouts.
RSMcMac04 6 months ago
@RSMcMac04 Really? That seems insane. But then again they'd be reviewing almost every attempt.
sandmonkey322 6 months ago
IT'S TUUKKA TIME
wwechikka 6 months ago
That's what he was like inside the locker room following the Game 7 loss to Philadelphia.
ROBLOXovicarlson 6 months ago
@ROBLOXovicarlson thats what philadelphia was like following the game 4 sweep loss to boston
johnyblue8 6 months ago
@johnyblue8 Especially Boucher.
ROBLOXovicarlson 6 months ago
where did he find a milk crate in a hocky arena?
johnyblue8 6 months ago 3
@johnyblue8 -- yeah really... :P
J3lli3B3aR 6 months ago
typical boston player sore loser
vivaportugalhabs 6 months ago
@vivaportugalhabs hard to be a sore loser when you win the stanley cup
LeGiiTMiiGeT 6 months ago
@LeGiiTMiiGeT rask flask. he did nothing to win the cup.
vivaportugalhabs 6 months ago
@vivaportugalhabs starting 29 games in the regular season is a big reason that thomas still had tons of stamina in the playoffs, and brought the cup home baby!!!
hipmoney420 6 months ago
@hipmoney420 still doesnt make up for the fact he threw a tantrum. he should just get over it.
vivaportugalhabs 5 months ago
first move was utter bullshit, should not have counted as a goal. second shot i couldnt tell where the puck went since its youtube quality, but it looked to hit the post pretty hard and bounce off.
NoNoDigUpStupid 6 months ago
it wont let me watch anything but this video funny lol rask
hockeyfrk86 6 months ago
lol rask
SimpleKlutch 7 months ago
I love Tuukka Rask.
clearly914 7 months ago 2
why was there a milk crate in the hallway?
shamu636 7 months ago 3
@shamu636 It's usually what the pucks are kept in.
PassionPye 7 months ago
the ref should get suspended to...
crassaylegs 7 months ago
0:17 "Don't waste my time" - The referee
loicalex 7 months ago
That ref must have had a plane to catch.
Paulthegorilla 7 months ago
Rask got fucked over hard
sambudwiser 7 months ago
wow rask is awesome!!! love it when goalies show so much passion
msgilmourgirl 7 months ago 24
i don't blame him... the play stopped
amram24 7 months ago
tuukka u just lost ur shit there
rockfan2345 7 months ago
thats some finnish rage for u hahah
Eikku1 7 months ago 3
did that actaully hit the crossbar?
Beantown37 8 months ago
@Beantown37 Yes it did.
Nassajepu 7 months ago
TUKKA RASK!!
lombax109 8 months ago
Damn those goals should not have counted, but watching Rask was probably worth it.
Deathslayer156 8 months ago
the first one was definitely bullshit, but the second was probably a goal. the ref had a really good look at it, while tuuka probably just heard it catch iron and was already on a short fuse from the first missed call. either way, epic meltdown that makes me laugh every time.
delirium266 8 months ago
Tuukka RASK!!!!! MY BOY
thepersian204 8 months ago
Oh Tuukka..........
L4D2Hunter2010 8 months ago
Normi tuomarit
Addehful 8 months ago
the first goal on rask was not a goal. the guy was not moving forward whatsoever. he was starting to go backwards.
guitargeek616 8 months ago 3
i was there and i high fived him lmfao true story
shanedasontv 8 months ago
Comment removed
AuktoFIN 9 months ago
Comment removed
97Flyer 9 months ago
@97Flyer ur gay
GoNMUWILDCATS 8 months ago
Ei kovin hyvä päivä?
Thebest100j 9 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Was the puck moving towards the opponents goal line at 0:09
kasper88881 9 months ago
24.2 The puck must be kept in motion towards the opponent’s goal line and once it is shot, the play shall be considered complete. No goal can be scored on a rebound of any kind (an exception being the puck off the goal post or crossbar, then the goalkeeper and then directly into the goal), and any time the puck crosses the goal line or comes to a complete stop, the shot shall be considered complete. The loss of the puck could arguably be viewed as a lateral deke.The second one - too hard to say
NickPalmer9 9 months ago
@NickPalmer9 lateral deek? he poke checked it
GoNMUWILDCATS 8 months ago
@GoNMUWILDCATS I don't think Rask connected on the poke-check, it looked like the guy pulled it back away from Rask.
NickPalmer9 8 months ago
@NickPalmer9 still its going backwards i dont blame him at all
GoNMUWILDCATS 8 months ago
Hoap, there it goes
Mr77os1 9 months ago
I wouldve lost it too. I think I would probably have done something I would regret and maybe gotten arrested for assault on the ref lol.
EnigmaComposer 9 months ago
@EnigmaComposer I know right, that ref was an idiot.
TheDrowWarrior1 9 months ago
first one... what the hell? are these house league refs? do i know you? second one... calm your friggin balls down, rask! what is this, the olympic sport: hockey equipement toss? it was a fair goal (at least i think it was) and even if it was a crossbar no goal, then calm your hormones anyways!
lecavalier101 9 months ago
@lecavalier101 It wasnt a fair goal the ref was a complete idiot as ive said a couples lol. I looked it up. he made some pretty bad calls. Id be pissed to and cmon everyone deserves one meltdown at least once in a while ^.^
TheDrowWarrior1 9 months ago 3
That referee was lucky it was Tuukka not Ronnie.........
AhzekAhriman 9 months ago 3
@AhzekAhriman whos ronnie
kas1236 9 months ago
@kas1236
Ron Hextall of course ;)
AhzekAhriman 9 months ago
@AhzekAhriman oh yeah. he was epic
kas1236 9 months ago
this shows how terible refs are
TheHockeybeast88 9 months ago
wow this ref sucks
AKzach97 9 months ago
next time rask sees the same judge hes gonna kick judges ass!!!
suomalainen1234 9 months ago
I would have laughed if one of the objects hit one of his own teamates.
666mathew 9 months ago
@666mathew well thats rude
TYL3R35 9 months ago
believe me.....refs hate goalies.
MegaSlapshot99 9 months ago 2
@MegaSlapshot99 and vice versa
TYL3R35 9 months ago
that was so bs..the first one especially..
Rey123Duncan 9 months ago
That's a bruins player
AlexKingDuWorld 9 months ago
The first shot was a rebound, and the second one wasn't even close. I guess his poor vision is why he refs minor league games...
TheWickedpissah 9 months ago 4
I saw the 1st one going in, Idk about the second
xxXRPrince24Xxx 9 months ago
@xxXRPrince24Xxx The first wouldn't have been a goal because the guy lost control and the puck stopped it's forward momentum. So the whistle should have been blown, no goal. The second one is hard what happened
zachhockey 9 months ago
GOAL GO CANES!!!!!!!
hockey100050 9 months ago
@hockey100050 FAG FUCK YOU!!!!!!!
templetonbob 9 months ago
@hockey100050 hey dumbass its the albany river rats idiot its the AHL
batistabomb1052 9 months ago
Thats me after a game of COD
BDpartnercoJM 9 months ago 213
@BDpartnercoJM fuckin right dude.
1toRespectReggae 7 months ago
@BDpartnercoJM fuck yeh me too except its after every death lol FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!!!
Baconburgdeluxe 6 months ago
@BDpartnercoJM
lol
alphadude159 6 months ago
@BDpartnercoJM thats everyone after a game of cod
CantDenyDime 5 months ago
@BDpartnercoJM
LOL
tbwj21 4 months ago
I wonder what would happen If he hit the ref
tenstripedcows 9 months ago
i would of threw my stick at the ref!
veeragandersucks 9 months ago
Yeah, that first shot was bullshit, it came off the forwards stick and he stopped, that should have been whistled dead. The 2nd...I don't get why it wasn't reviewed, but the video isn't clear enough to make a judgement for me as to if it hits the crossbar or not.
Zenn3k 9 months ago 5
Rask wasn't even suspended for this, AHL knew the referee shit the bed and blew the game. I guess cheating is the only way to beat Tuukka.
CaptainMazda 10 months ago 5
I LOVE TUUKKA
alwaysunnyariana 10 months ago
The first shot was called a goal??? Holy shit, I should be a ref.. it seems the qualifications aren't too high. Cause I'm pretty sure my 5 year old neighbor who plays in the mites knows that a shootout shot must maintain a forward motion. Pretty sure you can't hook around for a 2nd pass at the net.
piratebri 10 months ago
tukka is 2 much of hot head ik the goals wer dumb but he cnt do tht n go crazy he has 2 jst let it go
jacknyc2199 10 months ago
@jacknyc2199
If you had a spectacular shutout performance and win ruined by an incompetent referee on two consecutive occasions, you'd be a little mad about it too. Now please stop typing with your forehead.
CaptainMazda 10 months ago 119
@CaptainMazda hhahah..now please stop typing with your forehead..lmao i have have no idea why that was so funny.
gleeson630 6 months ago
Goalies gets more women than ref.
umpisuoli87 10 months ago 3
First goal was bull shit bit the second was in I think
acdcguy913 10 months ago
The first goal is bull shit but the second didn't look like it went in
acdcguy913 10 months ago
Ohhhh! So this is why that ref is still in the AHL!
sheffield8756 10 months ago
next time they should pick refs that can see
shadowhacka93 10 months ago
That's nothing. Have a look at this: youtube.com/watch?v=21nBVuCMPuQ
Irriducibile11 10 months ago
That's why that ref will never ref the NHL.
lobomuerto11 10 months ago
@lobomuerto11
Actually judging by this video, that ref could be a perfect fit in the NHL.
CaptainMazda 10 months ago
@CaptainMazda Hahaha ya probably.
lobomuerto11 10 months ago
lol, i dont blame him there..
NeukenTV 10 months ago
the first one was definitely bull shit
TRhockey27 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Rask is a crybaby douche. Who the hell behaves like that?! What a jackass. Go practice Tukka!!!
onefive0 10 months ago
@onefive0 I guess you saw that first shoot out, that was bullshit, no one cant make a goal there where that one fuck head made!
FINtroija 10 months ago
the 2nd call is bullshit haha
jdoghockey19 10 months ago
ARE U JOKING THE 1ST SHOT HE SKATED BACK AND THEN SHOT AND THEY COUNTED IT A GOAL rask should have spazed out
popdropshake 10 months ago