in the uk we have a law about offensive weapons. Anything can be used as one, but it's not an offensive weapon unless there was a deliberate attempt to use it as a weapon. You could kill somebody with a toothpick, really. Murderous people are the real problem, and that's a fact
So it's kind of like an army, it is not a physical object but can wipe out a whole nation.
Without laws on weapons dumb ass homicide rates would undoubtedly increase. It is not the person that causes murder, but rather the ease of doing it when a weapon is involved.
I read an article in the newspaper that the UK is going to run a trial of an unbreakable glass for use in bars to prevent what they called massive amounts of "glassings". We don't have "glassings" in the US and that's not a result of nanny laws. Has anybody in the UK ever considered taking actions other than just making more laws on top of the laws? Maybe trying to change the culture of violence and disobedience to the law? I think that would go a lot farther than trying to childproof the UK.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
hahahaha, people....hahahahahaha ...this is kinda funny- I mean the comments. who really GIVES A FUK. ( japs killing japs-) YA I LOVE THIS SHIIT. GO FOR ITTT. whens the next show>?????
Fuck you bitch! thats my friends man, FUCK YOU bring yo ass to Japan and I fuck your bitch ass up mother fucker! FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You come here I give you my address I fuck your fuckin ass up fuckin cracker ass mother FUCK!!!!!!
I'm pretty sure this douche bag, likes it when his own people stab each other, he only has the balls to do things like this on the net and in video games.
Honestly, the first thing I did was laugh. A dude drives into some people, jumps out of his car stabs them, and then proceeds to stab 10 more people, and meanwhile people stand there and are amazed at how many people he's stabbing. Man you got to love humanity
And you're so much better, posting comments about how the first thing you did after watching a video about murders was laugh. I don't expect you to think about it that much, you have your own life to worry about but laugh?... Thats messed up man.
If this thing had been happened in near of you, you would've been just shocked, and stand still... You just can't get prepared for that kind of surreal attack.
I am. That's why here in the U.S. some of us like to exercise our 2nd amendment rights. I have a CCW license that allows me to carry a hand gun. I would have used it on this man. So don't say that one cannot be prepared for that kind of surreal attack.
OK, if you're preparing for an attack with a weapon, does not mean, that you're prepared for it _mentally_. Try to touch people quickly one after the other. You'll be quite shocked to see their inability to react, and that is because they're not bodyguards, who was preparing for that for years. Ask a soldier how was that, when he had been shot at, at the first time.
So I think having a gun won't help you in a quick, suprise-attack, just fight-experience and reflexes.
This is true. A signal takes about a half second round trip from finger to brain & back. That's slow.
Reflexes don't involve the brain, they're done via the spine only: much faster.
Thing about a bullet is that you can't react in time even with reflexes: bullets go faster than the speed of sound, so the saying you'll never hear the bullet that kills you is quite true...
I don't know how i feel about gun control. Honestly i think it's difficult to have an opinion. I've seen the devestating effects on both sides of the argument. There really doesn't seem like a solid solution. The problem is personal responsibility. The issue is mainly centered around guns because they have a tendency to be very good at killing people...the same could be said for poisons, chemicals, or other hazardous stuff. I'd like to own a gun for protection, but I'd be afraid I might use it.
the problem isn't the weapons, it's people wanting to kill each other. However, it's much harder to kill somebody if you're only armed with a piece of string, and the person has a greater chance of self defense. Classic argument goes: man with gun vs man without gun. So unless everybody is going to be armed at all times, the murderer has a much higher chance of killing his victim. Effectively an armed society is a society at war, so I would recommend guns not being publicly available.
You forget that when you disarm the population, you're only disarming the civilian population and not the criminal population. In fact, the criminal population are criminals and don't follow the laws anyway. Unless you can start a campaign to undeniably exterminate the criminal population, their genetics, and any possibility of them coming back. Disarming the civilians while making it easier for the armed criminals to kill unarmed civilians is in every sense of the word, backwards reasoning.
Umm, I'm from the UK and it doesn't work like that here. Carrying any offensive weapon is in *itself* a crime, and guns are a serious crime. Sure, there's nasties who have them, and they're arrested for just having them. Or using them. The cops also have them.
There are no crime genes we know of. All people will fight under the right circumstances. Violence is sociological, not biological.
Crime is committed and punished, never prevented...
Well think of it like this. You have two sides. Side A works for the economy and side B fights side A and the nation in general tooth and nail. Any laws you make only effect side A. Now would it be wise to disarm side A but not side B? Would it be better to allow side A to arm themselves to defend against side B? Look at a case example like the UK where banning firearms caused a 40% rise in gun crimes... how? Disarm side A and side B will volunteer to disarm and join side A right?
How do you get a zero crime rate? Make everything legal. Do what you want.
Of course making guns a crime increases gun crime.
I've had the russian mafia hold guns to my head. Would I want one myself to help with that? No way dude. I'd already fucked the situation up way beforehand to get into that mess. I talked my way out, and got off with a beating. Indeed
Thing about the USA is that there's guns the way that some people have rats. They're everywhere. There's no way that they could all be removed. It's like all those russian AKs in the 3rd world. Hard to round 'em all up.
Thus the USA is a gun country, and will remain so. That's also why there's lots of shootings in the USA. In the UK we have stabbings and beatings.
Could you explain how "weapons" are criminal? The use of weapons to defend yourself or others and to provide food for yourself or others(in a civilian context) or to fight for your nation (in a military context) is not criminal by any means. Violence is an unavoidable reality and not always a choice, same goes for the use of weapons in violence. Weapons can be used without violence too. Is it criminal for me to go shooting and fishing in the everglades on weekends?
Weapons are a question of use. A spanner as a weapon is criminal. A gun can indeed be a tool, for instance a car is a form of tame cannon used for propulsion.
The morality of blood sports is dicey. Killing animals for sport is hard to justify in moral terms. Use your bare hands & I'll call you a real sport LOL.
Arguments for owning guns: sport (clay pigeons). Policing. Hunting for food. Pest/population control.
Register to own one, like a controlled substance, pass exams, legal responsibility
Great that the parents of that little girl standing there are just letting her watch all this. They're probably busy on their own keitais. Maybe she'll grow up and think this is a solution to her own problems. To quote Vonnegut, "And so it goes"
Your not impressed your an asshole! What the fuck do you mean bravo? Hopefully with any luck someone will run a shank into you cowardly belly and gut you like the worthless carp that you are. Fuck you!
@funkeymichaelmc Shank is a noun, not a verb. There is no action "to shank." You are stabbed with "a shank." Shank is a prison term describing an object such as a knife made of whatever materials are available.
@AnnoyingFlamingo - you are living up to your name. You are annoying. You too can go fuck yourself. How was my grammar there jack ass? You sound like you are busy sucking on a shank while you correct my English. Who the fuck are these people going around correcting people's comments? If you were standing in front of me I would break your nose.
Chainedviper....You're not funny you fucking piece of shit...what if it was your Mother,sister,brother,Grandmother,best friend being stabbed repeatedly and dying in a bloody pulp alone on a fucking street like dog? You fucking immature, sick fuck scumbag. Eat shit and choke on it...then die in a hole you maggot.
and a truck. Wounded 17. Most Japanese don't interfere, unlike most westerners who most likely would have tackled him before he got so far and stabbed so many shocked onlookers, including a cop responding to those hit in the original truck strike.
Aww, you probably think you're so cool with a statement like that. You watch WAY too much cartoons because you can totally tell you take it to heart. It's a bit sad that in reality you're probably some greasy 98lb gangly eleventh grade boy with no friends and BAD skin problems. 死になさい。
Oh no worries. I've no plans on wasting my time on your pathetic geek self after this. Hope you're well and that somewhere along the way you'll either kill yourself or make some greasy friends whom you can relate to. hahahaha <3
Yes, a cop drew his gun and the dude dropped the knife. Only after he drew his gun, btw.
Expect the killer to be executed. 100% probability. Japan doesn't mess around providing lifetime luxury to killers. They are a harmful burden on society, and removed as such, like a tumor. The execution is only announced AFTER it takes place. However, usually after a long period of confinement.
Thought technology was suppose to be better in places like Japan .. Wtf iis with this camera?
Tails04 8 months ago
everybody likes hurting others. yet everyone acts like they care about this.
juker606 8 months ago
GTA vice city-Tokyo
holiday666 1 year ago 3
i wish theirs a part two in akihabara i want he holding a miniguner
kinla123 2 years ago
in the uk we have a law about offensive weapons. Anything can be used as one, but it's not an offensive weapon unless there was a deliberate attempt to use it as a weapon. You could kill somebody with a toothpick, really. Murderous people are the real problem, and that's a fact
bishopdante 2 years ago
So it's kind of like an army, it is not a physical object but can wipe out a whole nation.
Without laws on weapons dumb ass homicide rates would undoubtedly increase. It is not the person that causes murder, but rather the ease of doing it when a weapon is involved.
snedie69er 2 years ago
I read an article in the newspaper that the UK is going to run a trial of an unbreakable glass for use in bars to prevent what they called massive amounts of "glassings". We don't have "glassings" in the US and that's not a result of nanny laws. Has anybody in the UK ever considered taking actions other than just making more laws on top of the laws? Maybe trying to change the culture of violence and disobedience to the law? I think that would go a lot farther than trying to childproof the UK.
BigBananaMan 1 year ago
your all dumb shit ball juice guzillin fuck tards with your thumbs stuck up eachothers asses ...........losers
kolijui 2 years ago
haha dum people make funny coments
elvis3422 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahahaha, people....hahahahahaha ...this is kinda funny- I mean the comments. who really GIVES A FUK. ( japs killing japs-) YA I LOVE THIS SHIIT. GO FOR ITTT. whens the next show>?????
daveGeonestyry 2 years ago
Fuck you bitch! thats my friends man, FUCK YOU bring yo ass to Japan and I fuck your bitch ass up mother fucker! FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You come here I give you my address I fuck your fuckin ass up fuckin cracker ass mother FUCK!!!!!!
renshumainichi 2 years ago
haha lol
Sweden80Here 2 years ago
@renshumainichi - you need to watch that cracker shit slope head!
funkeymichaelmc 1 year ago
retard okay if you were killing your own people or if your own people were killing each other would that be so funny? DUMBSHIT.
kikyoinuyasha123 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure this douche bag, likes it when his own people stab each other, he only has the balls to do things like this on the net and in video games.
He is living vicariously through media.
chiefpotleaf 2 years ago 3
the best part is when japs kills fat and stupid americans :D
vnano 2 years ago
was that around the same time us fat and stupid americans dropped the nuke on japan and killed how many millions of you "japs"?
natebrod 2 years ago
Honestly, the first thing I did was laugh. A dude drives into some people, jumps out of his car stabs them, and then proceeds to stab 10 more people, and meanwhile people stand there and are amazed at how many people he's stabbing. Man you got to love humanity
markuse24 3 years ago
And you're so much better, posting comments about how the first thing you did after watching a video about murders was laugh. I don't expect you to think about it that much, you have your own life to worry about but laugh?... Thats messed up man.
homer42016 3 years ago 4
If this thing had been happened in near of you, you would've been just shocked, and stand still... You just can't get prepared for that kind of surreal attack.
oneheadedboy 2 years ago
I am. That's why here in the U.S. some of us like to exercise our 2nd amendment rights. I have a CCW license that allows me to carry a hand gun. I would have used it on this man. So don't say that one cannot be prepared for that kind of surreal attack.
natebrod 2 years ago
OK, if you're preparing for an attack with a weapon, does not mean, that you're prepared for it _mentally_. Try to touch people quickly one after the other. You'll be quite shocked to see their inability to react, and that is because they're not bodyguards, who was preparing for that for years. Ask a soldier how was that, when he had been shot at, at the first time.
So I think having a gun won't help you in a quick, suprise-attack, just fight-experience and reflexes.
oneheadedboy 2 years ago
@oneheadedboy
This is true. A signal takes about a half second round trip from finger to brain & back. That's slow.
Reflexes don't involve the brain, they're done via the spine only: much faster.
Thing about a bullet is that you can't react in time even with reflexes: bullets go faster than the speed of sound, so the saying you'll never hear the bullet that kills you is quite true...
bishopdante 2 years ago
@bishopdante Tell that to the Bullet Proof Monk.
Dragon22873 1 year ago
I don't know how i feel about gun control. Honestly i think it's difficult to have an opinion. I've seen the devestating effects on both sides of the argument. There really doesn't seem like a solid solution. The problem is personal responsibility. The issue is mainly centered around guns because they have a tendency to be very good at killing people...the same could be said for poisons, chemicals, or other hazardous stuff. I'd like to own a gun for protection, but I'd be afraid I might use it.
Mattersmatter 2 years ago
the problem isn't the weapons, it's people wanting to kill each other. However, it's much harder to kill somebody if you're only armed with a piece of string, and the person has a greater chance of self defense. Classic argument goes: man with gun vs man without gun. So unless everybody is going to be armed at all times, the murderer has a much higher chance of killing his victim. Effectively an armed society is a society at war, so I would recommend guns not being publicly available.
bishopdante 2 years ago
You forget that when you disarm the population, you're only disarming the civilian population and not the criminal population. In fact, the criminal population are criminals and don't follow the laws anyway. Unless you can start a campaign to undeniably exterminate the criminal population, their genetics, and any possibility of them coming back. Disarming the civilians while making it easier for the armed criminals to kill unarmed civilians is in every sense of the word, backwards reasoning.
BigBananaMan 2 years ago
@BigBananaMan RE: criminal genetics BS:
Umm, I'm from the UK and it doesn't work like that here. Carrying any offensive weapon is in *itself* a crime, and guns are a serious crime. Sure, there's nasties who have them, and they're arrested for just having them. Or using them. The cops also have them.
There are no crime genes we know of. All people will fight under the right circumstances. Violence is sociological, not biological.
Crime is committed and punished, never prevented...
bishopdante 2 years ago
Well think of it like this. You have two sides. Side A works for the economy and side B fights side A and the nation in general tooth and nail. Any laws you make only effect side A. Now would it be wise to disarm side A but not side B? Would it be better to allow side A to arm themselves to defend against side B? Look at a case example like the UK where banning firearms caused a 40% rise in gun crimes... how? Disarm side A and side B will volunteer to disarm and join side A right?
BigBananaMan 2 years ago
Well, it goes like this.
How do you get a zero crime rate? Make everything legal. Do what you want.
Of course making guns a crime increases gun crime.
I've had the russian mafia hold guns to my head. Would I want one myself to help with that? No way dude. I'd already fucked the situation up way beforehand to get into that mess. I talked my way out, and got off with a beating. Indeed
bishopdante 2 years ago
Thing about the USA is that there's guns the way that some people have rats. They're everywhere. There's no way that they could all be removed. It's like all those russian AKs in the 3rd world. Hard to round 'em all up.
Thus the USA is a gun country, and will remain so. That's also why there's lots of shootings in the USA. In the UK we have stabbings and beatings.
Weapons are criminal
bishopdante 2 years ago
Could you explain how "weapons" are criminal? The use of weapons to defend yourself or others and to provide food for yourself or others(in a civilian context) or to fight for your nation (in a military context) is not criminal by any means. Violence is an unavoidable reality and not always a choice, same goes for the use of weapons in violence. Weapons can be used without violence too. Is it criminal for me to go shooting and fishing in the everglades on weekends?
BigBananaMan 1 year ago
Weapons are a question of use. A spanner as a weapon is criminal. A gun can indeed be a tool, for instance a car is a form of tame cannon used for propulsion.
The morality of blood sports is dicey. Killing animals for sport is hard to justify in moral terms. Use your bare hands & I'll call you a real sport LOL.
Arguments for owning guns: sport (clay pigeons). Policing. Hunting for food. Pest/population control.
Register to own one, like a controlled substance, pass exams, legal responsibility
bishopdante 1 year ago
markuse24, do you like murders? So somebody will kill you brutally in your life time, because I have an ability to see the future of retards.
destroychineseempire 2 years ago
EVERYONE WATCHING THIS IS SICK!!!
CraZYDoGG2000 3 years ago
you watched it
vnano 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha ,stabings :)
asianboooooobys 3 years ago
dick!
goukifafa 3 years ago 3
Great that the parents of that little girl standing there are just letting her watch all this. They're probably busy on their own keitais. Maybe she'll grow up and think this is a solution to her own problems. To quote Vonnegut, "And so it goes"
theschizoidman 3 years ago
Frieden, mit ihnen sein
TwilightZone02 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
7 dead with just a knife? I'm impressed. Bravo
chainedviper 3 years ago
Your not impressed your an asshole! What the fuck do you mean bravo? Hopefully with any luck someone will run a shank into you cowardly belly and gut you like the worthless carp that you are. Fuck you!
funkeymichaelmc 3 years ago 16
@funkeymichaelmc Shank is a noun, not a verb. There is no action "to shank." You are stabbed with "a shank." Shank is a prison term describing an object such as a knife made of whatever materials are available.
AnnoyingFlamingo 1 year ago
@AnnoyingFlamingo - you are living up to your name. You are annoying. You too can go fuck yourself. How was my grammar there jack ass? You sound like you are busy sucking on a shank while you correct my English. Who the fuck are these people going around correcting people's comments? If you were standing in front of me I would break your nose.
funkeymichaelmc 1 year ago
@AnnoyingFlamingo that's how funkeymichaelmc was using the word... "run a (n) shank into..." u retard fuck
benjippoi 8 months ago
Chainedviper....You're not funny you fucking piece of shit...what if it was your Mother,sister,brother,Grandmother,best friend being stabbed repeatedly and dying in a bloody pulp alone on a fucking street like dog? You fucking immature, sick fuck scumbag. Eat shit and choke on it...then die in a hole you maggot.
KeVox7 3 years ago
LMAO more more give me more insults hahaha (^_^)
infernalbovine 3 years ago
and a truck. Wounded 17. Most Japanese don't interfere, unlike most westerners who most likely would have tackled him before he got so far and stabbed so many shocked onlookers, including a cop responding to those hit in the original truck strike.
theschizoidman 3 years ago
you sub-human
loachendormi 3 years ago
Aww, you probably think you're so cool with a statement like that. You watch WAY too much cartoons because you can totally tell you take it to heart. It's a bit sad that in reality you're probably some greasy 98lb gangly eleventh grade boy with no friends and BAD skin problems. 死になさい。
pinkpuddlz101 3 years ago
Please don't insult me anymore you're hurting my feelings hahahaha
chainedviper 3 years ago
Oh no worries. I've no plans on wasting my time on your pathetic geek self after this. Hope you're well and that somewhere along the way you'll either kill yourself or make some greasy friends whom you can relate to. hahahaha <3
pinkpuddlz101 3 years ago
So, did the perpetrator get caught? What's the story on this? A cell phone video is nice by doesn't really tell us anything.
studio7manga 3 years ago
Yes, a cop drew his gun and the dude dropped the knife. Only after he drew his gun, btw.
Expect the killer to be executed. 100% probability. Japan doesn't mess around providing lifetime luxury to killers. They are a harmful burden on society, and removed as such, like a tumor. The execution is only announced AFTER it takes place. However, usually after a long period of confinement.
theschizoidman 3 years ago
Thank you very much for the information.
studio7manga 3 years ago
Poor quality filming!
mnlpsvsapo 3 years ago
you really are an asshole aren't you
pocketfullofstones24 3 years ago
yeah it is, i thought they had better cameras then that over there
bigkyle07 3 years ago