@josiahdallas I find that hard to believe that a jw would give you a bible, with out conducting a bible study with you at your home... lol and you sure they were jw??????
we see a reference within the Shem-Tob Matthew twjwl ˚wphyw ≥μyrkwmhw μynwqh μç axmyw »"ה" tyb w»çy abyw
ה is used by shem tob to show gods name jehovah "ה
shem tob used it but the New World Translation does not use the divine name at matthew 21v12 but shem tob did so this shows the jw did not insert the name there it reads
Jesus entered the house of the lord (temple (NWT]
"ה" jehovah in the shem tob
so the name jehovah was used by the NWT 18 TIMES AND SHEM TOB 19 TIMES
You dont know what youre talking about why not take a look at ben shobs matthew uses the name jehova as many times as the nwt so the name jehovah in the nwt is correct it was there to start with but removed by the people you are supporting
Some of the best Christian apologists were either involved or in the process of leaving the RCC. Martin Luther and Thomas Aquinas are famous examples. The fact that Manuscripts were found in Egypt or used by spirituallists or Catholics isn't proof in itself that they are corrupt. To say otherwise would be a guilt by association argument.
WestCott and Hort is an excellent text. They use an older and more accurate text than the texts used by the KJV. KJ onlyists use a guilt by association argument with the Westcott-Hort text just because Westcott and Hort were involved in spiritualism. To the Watchtower's credit, the GB did an excellent job in their Greek to English interlinear. However, they butcher the Bible in the English section. The rest of your analysis is based on guilt by association.
Sure, get your translation from spiritualists, that makes NO sense. Why not get a Buddhist or a Satan worshiper to translate something for you too? Do you not understand what the Jesuits did with the Alexandrian texts?
Sorry to burst the KJV onlyism bubble but read Acts 9:7 vs. Acts 22:9. There is no way around this error. Acts 9:7 "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man." vs. Acts 22:9 "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me." First they heard a voice but saw nothing. The 2nd account they heard no voice but saw a light. Ummm hello.
that's so easy to explain what has happened here is these solders that escorted Saul saw and heard something but they did not hear what was said just like being in a room and people are talking you don't hear what they are talking about unless they are directing it to you and besides this is not a salvation issue ! what is is the fact we have Benny hinn Kenneth Copland Robert schuller and all those false healer money preachers that we have to expose as false teachers and prophets .
Take the information you have from both verses and it is easy to figure out.
Acts 9:7 says they heard "a" voice doesn't say who's voice.
Acts 22:9 says they didn't hear him(Jesus) talking.
This was a 2 way conversation between Jesus and Saul. Therefore if they didn't hear Jesus yet they could still hear Saul but they couldn't see him because of the light.
Let's be honest here the KJV has its fair share of problems too since it was influenced by the Vulgate. For one, the KJV contains the Johanine Comma which is NOT scripture and John himself warned against adding to scripture. It's also capricious how it renders 3 Greeks words and one Hebrew all as 'hell' which is another carryover from pagan Romanism. Same w. the concept of 'eternity' which actually refers to ages. That's just for starters. Helps if you look at original MSS like real researchers.
Great video i wish all the so called true christian church ministers would watch this as i find even in my church its very hard to debate with the lukewarm Christians because they all like the NIV or the good news bible etc they all have some very serious omissions in them and i would not recommend it to anyone who wants to do some serious bible study God bless and keep up the good work .
Thank you for the info but I want my 9 minutes and 59 seconds back.All you could have said was the king james version was the truest to form and expounded more on that instead of the other bable...bibles I mean....I expect my time back promptly..thank you once again
Please help me. I am a long time Christian, but relatively NEW to this "versions of the Bible" debate. Can you point me to some videos that explain EXACTLY WHY the KJV is the true version? I don't want FLUFF videos, but I want to know WHY the Alexandrian manuscripts are suspect even though they are "older" than the others.
Scott A. Johnson's videos about the king james version (search "kjv") at his homepage at sermonaudio[DOT]com.
2 main Bible routes, a northern one, which is the right one, and a southern, corrupted one, which has its origin in Alexandria. Egypt has never been something positive, in a biblical view.
The New International for instance is published by Zondervan / Harper Collins, also distributing the satanic Bible. Translated by several homosexuals and 64 000 words are removed, compared to kjv.
why would you even waiste your time with reading their translation. one of their Bibles was given to me at an airport once by a group of them. A really nice one too....I promptly walked to the nearest trash can and dropped it where it belongs.
@josiahdallas I find that hard to believe that a jw would give you a bible, with out conducting a bible study with you at your home... lol and you sure they were jw??????
@josiahdallas I find that hard to believe that a jw would give you a bible, with out conducting a bible study with you at your home... lol and you sure they were jw??????
That was a really good. really really really good explanation of what is going on. Thank you.
Also check out this video for additional information on why the KJV is about the best english translation available...
watch?v=V8C-Dl7VpRQ
Calebkoss 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@josiahdallas I find that hard to believe that a jw would give you a bible, with out conducting a bible study with you at your home... lol and you sure they were jw??????
2011JSF 10 months ago
Is there a King James Version of the Apocrypha or any reliable translation? I want my Bible to be complete 73 books in all.
NiGHTS4life 1 year ago
read the King James Only Controversy b Dr. James White. It puts to bed the KJV purist mentality....Cheers
robotwookie 1 year ago
2 Timothy 2:24
And the Lord's servant [fn] must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil .English Standard Version
John Gill's Bible Commentary says
notwithstanding all discouragements,bearing evil, so as not to be irritated and provoked
Robertson's NT Word Studies {Forbearing} (anexikakon). Late compound (from future of anecw, anexw, and kakon, putting up with evil)
SO YOU WERE WRONG THE NWT WAS RIGHT
1 DOWN MORE TO FOLLOW
judgerutherford 1 year ago
we see a reference within the Shem-Tob Matthew twjwl ˚wphyw ≥μyrkwmhw μynwqh μç axmyw »"ה" tyb w»çy abyw
ה is used by shem tob to show gods name jehovah "ה
shem tob used it but the New World Translation does not use the divine name at matthew 21v12 but shem tob did so this shows the jw did not insert the name there it reads
Jesus entered the house of the lord (temple (NWT]
"ה" jehovah in the shem tob
so the name jehovah was used by the NWT 18 TIMES AND SHEM TOB 19 TIMES
The name belongs there
judgerutherford 1 year ago
You dont know what youre talking about why not take a look at ben shobs matthew uses the name jehova as many times as the nwt so the name jehovah in the nwt is correct it was there to start with but removed by the people you are supporting
false religious clergy
judgerutherford 1 year ago
Some of the best Christian apologists were either involved or in the process of leaving the RCC. Martin Luther and Thomas Aquinas are famous examples. The fact that Manuscripts were found in Egypt or used by spirituallists or Catholics isn't proof in itself that they are corrupt. To say otherwise would be a guilt by association argument.
PraiseYeshua 2 years ago
WestCott and Hort is an excellent text. They use an older and more accurate text than the texts used by the KJV. KJ onlyists use a guilt by association argument with the Westcott-Hort text just because Westcott and Hort were involved in spiritualism. To the Watchtower's credit, the GB did an excellent job in their Greek to English interlinear. However, they butcher the Bible in the English section. The rest of your analysis is based on guilt by association.
PraiseYeshua 2 years ago
Sure, get your translation from spiritualists, that makes NO sense. Why not get a Buddhist or a Satan worshiper to translate something for you too? Do you not understand what the Jesuits did with the Alexandrian texts?
mkzmotorsports 2 years ago
Sorry to burst the KJV onlyism bubble but read Acts 9:7 vs. Acts 22:9. There is no way around this error. Acts 9:7 "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man." vs. Acts 22:9 "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me." First they heard a voice but saw nothing. The 2nd account they heard no voice but saw a light. Ummm hello.
Crazeetuffer 2 years ago
that's so easy to explain what has happened here is these solders that escorted Saul saw and heard something but they did not hear what was said just like being in a room and people are talking you don't hear what they are talking about unless they are directing it to you and besides this is not a salvation issue ! what is is the fact we have Benny hinn Kenneth Copland Robert schuller and all those false healer money preachers that we have to expose as false teachers and prophets .
BornSinners 2 years ago
Comment removed
neoverse 2 years ago
Take the information you have from both verses and it is easy to figure out.
Acts 9:7 says they heard "a" voice doesn't say who's voice.
Acts 22:9 says they didn't hear him(Jesus) talking.
This was a 2 way conversation between Jesus and Saul. Therefore if they didn't hear Jesus yet they could still hear Saul but they couldn't see him because of the light.
neoverse 2 years ago
Let's be honest here the KJV has its fair share of problems too since it was influenced by the Vulgate. For one, the KJV contains the Johanine Comma which is NOT scripture and John himself warned against adding to scripture. It's also capricious how it renders 3 Greeks words and one Hebrew all as 'hell' which is another carryover from pagan Romanism. Same w. the concept of 'eternity' which actually refers to ages. That's just for starters. Helps if you look at original MSS like real researchers.
AllOtherNamesUsed 2 years ago
Wouldn't the world be a better place if you put your considerable effort into something constrictive?
AEWEIS 2 years ago
Great video i wish all the so called true christian church ministers would watch this as i find even in my church its very hard to debate with the lukewarm Christians because they all like the NIV or the good news bible etc they all have some very serious omissions in them and i would not recommend it to anyone who wants to do some serious bible study God bless and keep up the good work .
BornSinners 2 years ago
Thank you for the info but I want my 9 minutes and 59 seconds back.All you could have said was the king james version was the truest to form and expounded more on that instead of the other bable...bibles I mean....I expect my time back promptly..thank you once again
DABrewer1 2 years ago
Keep exposing the unfruitful works of darkness brothers.
COME OUT FROM AMONGST the WHORE (Babylon/Rcc) and "ALL" her Harlots (denominations)<---DEMONinations.
THE SPIRIT (Power) of GOD reveals the HEART (Father) behind the WORD(Son)!
ONErighteousNESS 2 years ago
Please help me. I am a long time Christian, but relatively NEW to this "versions of the Bible" debate. Can you point me to some videos that explain EXACTLY WHY the KJV is the true version? I don't want FLUFF videos, but I want to know WHY the Alexandrian manuscripts are suspect even though they are "older" than the others.
nmreich 2 years ago 2
Scott A. Johnson's videos about the king james version (search "kjv") at his homepage at sermonaudio[DOT]com.
2 main Bible routes, a northern one, which is the right one, and a southern, corrupted one, which has its origin in Alexandria. Egypt has never been something positive, in a biblical view.
The New International for instance is published by Zondervan / Harper Collins, also distributing the satanic Bible. Translated by several homosexuals and 64 000 words are removed, compared to kjv.
schnor88 2 years ago
The channel 33rdbook has some good stuff on Bible translations.
If you want go deep, search for "Are Modern Bible Translations Trustworthy" on this channel. (see also: Gail Riplinger)
jakedevon 2 years ago
Great research! Thanks! 5***** and favored! :) God Bless you in the name of Jesus!
LUV4GODALMIGHTY 2 years ago 2
why would you even waiste your time with reading their translation. one of their Bibles was given to me at an airport once by a group of them. A really nice one too....I promptly walked to the nearest trash can and dropped it where it belongs.
josiahdallas 2 years ago 2
@josiahdallas I find that hard to believe that a jw would give you a bible, with out conducting a bible study with you at your home... lol and you sure they were jw??????
2011JSF 10 months ago
@josiahdallas I find that hard to believe that a jw would give you a bible, with out conducting a bible study with you at your home... lol and you sure they were jw??????
2011JSF 10 months ago