What Climate Change kooks (global warming cultist) don't want you to see

[amazingbollweevil]

Scientists did not say the earth was freezing in the 70's. When a video starts out with such a clear lie, one knows the rest of the presentation is going to be equally poor. So few facts and so many errors, inaccuracies and lies in this video. Pathetic.

[RedXlV]

The kooks and fanatics are fools like you who deny global warming and push LIES like your "scientists used to say global cooling was coming" crap. And it's been getting HOTTER over the last 10 years. It's also NOT part of the normal cycle, and only idiots think it is.

[rjdyou]

It's interesting to see a teenager so well informed...

[15hmael]

Your first graph shows [CO2] above 394ppm, Dr. Pieter Tans, NOAA/ESRL sets 2011 [CO2] at 389ppm so lets just say 390ppm.Now check where 390ppm is on your next two graphs.

[mphello]

Go watch all of Potholer54's and greenman3610's videos,

and read all the articles at skepticalscience com. Then come back and claim anthropogenic global warming (AGW) doesn't exist.

And you American overpopulation-deniers and other conservaturds hypocritically cry like babies just because of a few immigrants from Mexico.

If the world's not overpopulated, then you've got NOTHING to complain about them and you'd better support their demands for all the same rights you have.

[jackdeath]

Climate scientists never said the world was freezing in the 1970s. Looks like some asshole bought into the rightwing bullshit, hook, line, and sinker. A Time magazine columnist printed some wild speculation about the possibility of an ice age returning in the next million years, and the right has quote mined this strawman as something climate scientists believe. Total nonsense! Repeated here by a fucktard.

[mphello]

@jackdeath

Amen! Keep up the great fight!

This video shows the mentality of the deniertards. They think a South Park video is some kind of disprove of the fact of AGW.

[thatstheguy07]

@mphello Only simple things are needed to show the lunacy of the theories of GW. It is a lie. Al Gore lied to you. Wake up and realize that. Youre holding on to a lie.

[mphello]

@thatstheguy07

Moncktongate and your heroes Alex Jones and the Kock brothers lied to you.

AGW has absolutely nothing to do with Al Gore. Get that through your subhuman denier heads.

[LedaOhio4]

Any warming would be from all the shit they are spraying in the air and their oil spills and poisoning of everything..

[uknowispeaksense]

I can sum up the link between religion and climate change denial with a bag of beetles watch?v=r-ndjgnNsjQ

[thatstheguy07]

@uknowispeaksense No ones denying that the climate changes. Its that it isnt due to C02. Climate change and global warming are not the same thing, regardless of what the whitehouse wants you to believe.

[uknowispeaksense]

@thatstheguy07 I don't know why you think the whitehouse has anything to do with the way my thoughts on climate change and global warming are formulated. Here's a few sources of information for you. Read them, and if you have trouble understanding them, get back to me and I'll explain it to you.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1204994

DOI: 10.1126/science.1206583

DOI: 10.1126/science.1210288

DOI: 10.1126/science.1127000

DOI: 10.1007/s00382-011-1067-4

DOI: 10.1007/s00382-010-0742-1

[mphello]

@uknowispeaksense Great job! These deniers have got NOTHING of value to say.

[thatstheguy07]

@uknowispeaksense If you fail to understand GW and CC are too different things, and that one is a lie and one has always happened throughout history, then you have a problem.

[uknowispeaksense]

@thatstheguy07 ok, so you didn't read my sources. Well its your choice to be wilfully ignorant. It is one of the saddest of human traits and you have my sympathy. Best of luck breathing with your head in the sand.

[sunflowerofpeace]

Al Gore can kick my ass,what a wanker...great use of propaganda ;) Carbon tax, don't even get me started...

[Odysseus087]

nice propaganda piece

[SmokeBojangles]

Im friggin Cold!

[bapyou]

After you Becky Glenn fans are done watching this psuedo-intellectual's utterly stupid presentation, watch one of the long Naomi Oreskes talks here on YT. Or better yet, read her book 'Merchants of Doubt.' In it, Oreskes reveals -- through painstaking research and massive documentation -- the project to plant the seed of doubt in the mind of the public concerning global warming, a project led by scientists from the Marshall Institute, the same people claiming cigarettes don't cause cancer.

[thatstheguy07]

@bapyou It was warmer in the Medevil ages than it is now. The climate changes.  Always has. And it aint due to C02.

[mikedd56]

How bout the fact that Gore & his cronies use Global Warming when its convenient & Climate Change when its not. Does that not tell u anything. But if the globe isnt warming I dont see how I should be concerned about the climate changing, b/c by my calculation the climate has changed since forever, they are called seasons. I mean wtf we should be alarmed if the temp. goes up or if it goes down. Will some1 please explain to me the huge threat of climate change

[bane349]

google CASOS, or google- The Effects Of Computational Analysis On Society

[mdiem]

This video packs more lies per minute than I've seen in a long time.

The science isn't there - yet somehow 90% of the world's scientists understand the science that is there and agree that AGW is real and is a problem.

And I'm getting sick of the 'it's gov'ts telling us this.' - No, governments went to scientists for research and recommendation. The science is real. If governments and individuals try to push political agendas and make a buck, well that's what they do, isn't it?

[Zen5012]

"Screw climate change and have a nice day". Wonderful and succinct. Well done sir.

Oh no, it's a new ice age! Oh no, the world will be overpopulated! Oh no, there's gonna be famine! Oh no, the ozone layer! Oh no, the gas that feeds plant life and, in return, animal life - the very gas that we exhale as a byproduct of respiration is going to heat the planet up a couple of degrees and this is bad since we all know that living creatures fare better in the cold than the warm!

[GregTom2]

If you make your opinion on such an important debate by waching a little nobody barfing non-sense and being like "oh yeah you heard my right, I just said... a bad word", brigning american nationalism into that, acusing people of being evil anti-capitalis and insulting common sens... on youtube, instead of listening to 98% of the world's climatologis, then you are probably American. Also what's with you americans, it discusts me how you use the pride of your nation to justify anything

[thefaceinface]

What killed the Dinosaurs? A magical asteroid or was it an ice age? I dont know. Maybe they created climate change by driving too many cars. Ah carbon based life forms.

[kingofthepaupers]

Jct: Right on. But why? Yes, he mentioned the bankers but not the bankers' Big Lie that there is not only Shift A inflation, more money chasing the same goods, but newly discovered Shift B inflation, same money chasing ____ goods. Only "More money chasing same goods" is taught in Economics. "Same money chasing ____ goods" is not. Shift A inflation is taught, Shift B inflation is not. Search and you'll find I"m the only person talking about the other inflation shift in the world. Wonder why?

[getagripcanada]

Global warming is just another weapon of mass distraction. Along with their other "wars" on whatever. Same with the financial meltdown, the gulf spill etc. etc. etc. While we are busy trying to keep up with all these wars........they are stealing everything we own and setting up a world government complete with torture, starvation, extermination and microchips. Enjoy.

[TheEbonicslover]

we don't have enough ammo to stop these parasites coming out of the wood works to destroy our businesses. So you what your gonna do now...? More zombies than bullets!!!

[LITTLEMONSTERism]

the 'pink' dragon, etc is not a compelling argument.

Personally, i do not listen to any one source.

OR..two, three sources for that matter. Especially when it comes to something of this magnitude. Whether it's Global warming or manipulation of the public.

WE must make observation through our own eyes, not through those of those that wish to impose their will upon us.

[rfalfonse]

Key problem for the warmists --> Correlation vs. Cause

This whole global warming thing is just a cynical restatement of Pascal's wager.

And I'm not buying it.

[paydae]

great vid

[Thisawareness]

AGW Cult

You can always tell its a Cult when the leader does not follow his own teachings they demand people to sacrifice while the leader does not Al Gore's lifestyle is at odds with his teachings, following his teachings makes you poor under his power and makes him rich (carbon credits)

The fact that he feels he needs people to go from school to school convincing children, indicates he realizes the public at large is not buying his story and so he preys on the easily influenced and misled

[Thisawareness]

AGW Cult PT2

The only way to deal with a cult is to isolate the leader from his followers by pointing out the inconsistencies of his lifestyle. You can counter and expose his lies all you want, but until you deal with the leader in the follower's eyes, the follower will believe anything the leader says, even 2 + 2 = 5. This is not about logic and reason, this is about faith and belonging to something greater than yourself to achieve a world wide impact.

[JuanJoseFaOrTi]

Well global warming DOES exist... but the name is no right... GLOBAL CLIAMATE CHANGE! is REAL!! hotter summers... colder winters... more rain somewhere and less rain somewhere else... droughts... blizzards... volcanoes... earthquakes... aurora borealis out of place... ETC.

[glennimmortal]

Excellent vid, I'm from New Zealand being following global warming for the last 8 years or so. We have had our own little climategate e.g freedom of info requests ignored, reasons for adjustments to the raw data have been lost OOPs sound familia. This whole thing stinks more than a hippies arm pits. One good thing though when this finally blows up as the hoax that it is Humanity as a whole will be a whole lot smarter.

[Kenzofeis]

It may well be the "big oil" - that is, the energy delivery interests, that is behind the "global warming".

How?

This is a nice way for them to rise the prices and secure the continuum of as few as possible "monopolies", and, all the other leeches will see a chance to make money too.

This way they can secure their own interests.

The "chemtrails" can be explained the same way, if they can make the climate cooler, they can sell more.

[MysteryBC]

The 3rd World population is exploding, while Europe and the West is dieing.

Other than that, excellent video.

[Ponerology]

Great video. Once again, it is all about imperialism.

[Aedoneus2]

I don't know man. That pink dragon looks mighty intimidating. Do you except PayPal? In all seriousness good job on the video. :D

[Rys2sense]

@Aedoneus2 no paypal, but you can by one of my books :)

[AFAskygoddess]

apowers.0000007 [sic]: If it looks like a troll and walks like a troll and quacks like a troll, would even dense Al Gore recognize you to be a troll?

OMG, you are "replying " to your own comments ROTFLMAO!!!!

[pondman27]

If we allow them to impose a tax on Carbon, then they will have a tax on life, for we are all Carbon based life forms.

ANd lets be serious, if this was really such a crisis, wouldn't we see a reduction in the biggest sooty footprint of all, the military genocidal wars of occupation.

[apowers7]

Is bill gates, the vast majority of scientists and the leaders of the pentagons all cooks then?

[apowers7]

Forget what Al Gore says the vast majority of scientist say that there is scientific evidence that CO2 causes global warming by eating away the ozone layer. There is scientific evidence for this. Sure there have been heat cycles in the past, scientists know this, but the current rise in heat is caused by CO2. Yes trees take in CO2, that is why deforestation causes 20% of CO2 emissions. We don't have to punish the third world if we use the carbon tax (oil is inelastic) to invest in better R&D.

[apowers7]

@apowers7 Have you not read Superfreakonomics even libertarians are saying that it is not the non-existence of global warming that is the problem it's the fact that there aren't enough incentives to do R&D into things that will help the planet like alternative fuels, renewable energy and the most cost effective and greatest idea yet geo-engineering. All that global warming denial does is encourage people not to come up with creative ideas and innovations to tackle this massive problem.

[Rys2sense]

@apowers7 It doesn't matter what scientist say it matters what science says. It's not up for a vote. Data determines what is true not popularity. People have economic reasons to support the global warming myth. They stand to gain nothing by opposing it. It's opposed because it isn't true. The earth has gotten cooler the last ten years and it has cycled like this for millions of years. Global warming kooks don't refute that they just omit it on purpose.

[apowers7]

@Rys2sense The earth has gotten cooler in the last few years according to who? Also the reason why the vast majority of scientists say global warming exists is because there is scientific evidence that CO2 destroys the ozone making the world warmer. You should read superfreakonomics because it explains that even though global warming is a problem it can be very easily fixed. to relate this point about your point about people being for it for economic gain Bill Gates and scientists like

[apowers7]

@apowers7 the CEO of Intellectual Venture who use to work for Microsoft have found a geo-engineering solution that would only cost $240 million and Bill Gates is thinking of giving the world it for free through his The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He is doing this because Global warming is actually creating inequality by making it harder for subsistence farmers to make a living. The interesting thing about this is that of all people Al Gore is actually against this. So to reiterate my

[apowers7]

@apowers7 earlier point the problem isn't that lack of existence of global warming it is the fact that their aren't enough incentives to promote R&D.

[Rys2sense]

@apowers7 That has nothing to do with stopping global warming. It's about lowering cost for gas and electricity. It always good to use less fuel. It's not good to create a dooms day scenario around it in order to promote thief and control over industry as Gore and co are.

[apowers7]

@Rys2sense No we need to get off gas and produce better technology for electricity. I agree global warming may not destroy the world but it will make weather much more extreme and for many economies that rely on agriculture even if the world doesn't get destroyed in a doomsday scenario like "the day after tomorow" global warming will have a direct effect on the rise of inequality, poverty and terrorism in these economies that soley rely on agriculture.

[Rys2sense]

@apowers7 The last decade each year colder than the last according to the exact same data the GWK used to try to say it got hotter. 1998 was el nino and that was a unusually hot year from 2000 to now its been getting cooler. And CO2 does not destroy the ozone. FCLC destroys the ozone and they abandoned that rational like 8 years ago. CO2 is something plants breathe. For the majority of the earths life there was actually more CO2 than now.

[danmanjones]

@apowers7 CO2 destroys the ozone layer? Man that's kooky.

[apowers7]

@danmanjones I confused CO2 with FCLC. Im not a scientist but I think FCLC depletes the ozone and CO2 reinforces it thereby trapping heat between the Earth's surface and the ozone.

[danmanjones]

@apowers7 Well I've a science degree & have looked at this issue quite a bit. I can honestly tell you that 1. AGW is a myth based on unsound science and 2. you should shutup and leave this stpic to people who have a grasp on the fundamentals. You have no idea what you're talking about. This issue has 3 major wings - political, economic & scientific. You don't seem to understand any of them. No offense dude.

[apowers7]

@danmanjones well i guess you would like to consider yourself a Galileo on this issue the only difference is that unlike galileo you haven't produced any new evidence to support a paradigm shift. yes past heat cycles have occured naturally but as I stated before the vast majority of scientists, including the CEO of Intelectual Ventures who Bill Gates said was the smartest man he knew, understand that the evidence points to this current increase in temp to be man made

[danmanjones]

@apowers7 Myhrvold is a patent monger amongst other things & has invented a way to reduce CO2 from the atmosphere. It involves hoses going 25km up. But like Ry says you should really listen to the science more than the scientists. Start by dissecting the UN reports - you'll find it's the same group of authors & the same group of data they use to support their wild claims about atmospheric CO2 driving global temperatures. Many eminent scientists refute their claims but they wield a lot of power.

[apowers7]

@danmanjones you forgot to mention that his patent was not about reducing CO2 which would cost 4% of GDP, but through Geo engineering which would only cost $240 million and Bill Gates would pay for it through the B&M Gates Foundation. The only reason it has been started yet is because politicians like Al Gore are skeptical because they are fundamentalists in their belief that only a reduction in consumption will stop global warming. It isn't all a black and white.

[danmanjones]

@apowers7 I don't know a lot about his patented design but of course he's going to support the AGW theory when he stands to make mega-bucks from it. The guy is shrewd like Bill Gates. Both are opportunists & can't be trusted.

[apowers7]

@danmanjones how is he going to make mega bucks from it if the whole thing only costs 240 million compared to 4% of GDP if he was a real opportunist, plus that would be if he was planning to profit from it which he is not because it is going to be part of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation a charity which means non-profit organization. I think it is you who doesn't understand the politics, economics and science of global warming. No offense dude.

[danmanjones]

@apowers7 Granted i don't know a lot about this guy's invention but I do know a thing or 2 about the Gates foundation...... you have a lot to learn sonny.

[apowers7]

@danmanjones oh shit "sonny"? lol, i know that you have a science degree and all but you don't that many years of wisdom. So tell me what you know about the Gates foundation that I don't know.

[danmanjones]

@apowers7 maybe some other time, on a forum that has more than 500 char limit. For starters it backs a lot of eugenics programs. Gates at a TED talk the other month was promoting vaccines as a form of population reduction. It's a Bill Gates front where he gets to do a bunch of stuff in the name of "charity". He's a social engineer amongst other things. That's a quick summary,

[apowers7]

@danmanjones yeah I saw that TED talks speech, it wasn't really clear what he meant by that or how that is supposed to control the population, it could be that he mistakenly said that. I think there is a possibility that you could be right, but I mean unless he has a really tight control on the media there doesn't seem to have been any misconduct yet. but I think that that is a valid point that his intentions are unclear is he a philanthropist or just disguised as one

[danmanjones]

@apowers7 Yeah it wasn't totally clear what he meant but if you look at the vaccination programs his 'charity' is behind in 3rd world countries it's easy to assume they're sterilisation programs in disguise. Look at more lefty docos hehe.

[JuicYouS]

@Rys2sense seen this yet?

watch?v=P2qVNK6zFgE

[apowers7]

@Rys2sense yes CO2 is something plants breathe and yes there are heat cycles but an excess of co2 also effects the ozone layer making the planet warmer. Deforestation is one of the largest emitters of co2. other large emiters are coal plants and automobiles, something that can be easily fixed through technological innovation. fighting global warming would make the market more competitive if companies were offered tax cuts as an incentive to invest in R&D for environmental friendly products.

[pondman27]

@apowers7

Yep

Bill Gates at a recent RED talk also admitted that vaccines are for population control.

Its such a shame that so many people don't even bother to research the basic properties of CO2.

[Oceanno69]

I have never believe in G_W crap!! Thank you for the GREAT VID!

[theVAGINAntichrist]

MANBEARPIG

[Jaruslothran]

lol, loved the dragon part

[TheParadigmShift]

Great additional info Ry,

I would have also added this watch?v=P2qVNK6zFgE

There is just so much info out there that debunks global warming yet the herd just believes what the idiot tube tells them.

[Rys2sense]

@TheParadigmShift well they believe it based on ideology not science. It's just like a religion for them.