True Free energy devices exist,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
we need to anally probe Lil Marky Mark n the Funky Bunch...eat lettuce, fruit and plenty of dooshka, and we will commence the anal implants ,,we require Mother and Papa to observe lil dahlins....Rock,f--k it lets , oh lets get it own!
The original pictures may not have been proven fakes, but they most likely are.
The original hoaxster made the mistake of including Japanese Katakana lettering on his model. Maybe he thought it would pass for something alien, or maybe he is in fact Japanese. Either way, it's not alien.
To AOL viewers... The drone case has not been proved fake. You are a bit late to the discussion. The videos I have created were originally for the 'dronies' that have followed this story from a year ago! All videos of the drone are not real. The photos however are still undetermined as to their origin. If you want to join in the discussion, and get to the bottom of this, go to the OpenMindsForum (Google it) where there is a wealth of work on this subject. I am not the originator in any way. thx
amazing.... I'm in CA till' August, and I hope to see one of those. I heard that there was one in Capatola? I'm in Santa Cruz. Any sightings near there? btw, I saw this vid on C2C
The video responce you see above (or below) this text is of the recent 'Big Basin' sighting. I decided to see if I could give that one a blast. See what you think. Cheers
I truly, truly feel sorry for humanity at this point. All of the videos and pictures out of this object or variants are fakes the lighting is incorrect, the pixel junction, the texture work. I would bet my life and the life of my family that's how certain I am and I'm a amateur photoshop 3D modeler.
I recognize this silly thing. I first seen it on that Gerge Noory radio show web page. I was one of those who knew it was CG as well. I'm glad to see someone making examples.
If Saladboy can provide a video of the exact same motion of the flying wing deal in pre-render wireframe, and show successive CGI texture layering, only THEN will we believe he did it. (From a CGI expert who works at ILM that I know very well). The flying iron howver clearly does not have the required natural speculation, shadowing or texture matching that the flying wing babies do. If you can prove you did it in CGI, I have very lucrative job offer for you.
Have you done it yet? That would put to rest all the conspiracy theorists. By the way, I take you at your word and think your video is fake- heck of a job. Not sure about the photos though my guess is they are as well.
I am a computer animation expert. Obviously the author of this video has very good cg skills. What software did you use to create this video? How did you create the 3D model of the object? Did you mesh it yourself, by looking at the California photographs? Same question for textures on the drone (the alien-looking text, etc.)
Hi. I used Lightwave. Yep, I modelled the object from the photos myself. The alien text is just an approximation using a similar font. Do you work for a magazine or similar? Just wondering how you become a computer animation expert? (I mean that in all sincerity) cheers.
READ "Salad's" comment...He made the video to show what can be done with CGI...all you have to do is watch his "Iron Propulsion" video as proof. Also his NEW "Motion Study". DGarrison722ataoldotcom.
I've just uploaded a second animation. This time I've tried to give it a different form of motion, that should hopefully match in with witness reports. I've not got it completely right, as the camera perhaps doesn't show the motion as well as I'd hoped. I'll see if I can find a better way of doing it.
Yes it is a fake. When I created this, it was purely to show a few people over at the openmindsforum. I never expected such huge interest. If Linda on C2C hadn't said it was real, I don't think it would have been so widely seen. I'm not debinking anything, I'm just interested.
Nice work saladfingers. Good rotation but the objects center of gravity is slightly toward the long wing and it would be more energy efficient for the object to rotate around that center instead of the geometric center of the object, so it will seem as if it wobbles slightly. I made a similar video and am responding and need some advice and improvement. Thanks.
I don't entirely agree. Just because the tail wing is quite big and long, it doesn't make the centre of gravity shift toward it. If you study the images from Chad and co, the wing looks partly hollow down the edges. This tail could be quite light. Centre of gravity is defined by weight, not size.
Really nice try. I know most would think it would rotate like that because the center is small but I would definitely believe the whole water bug flight style because it is kinda shaped like a dragon fly.
If not a hoax, maybe it is a flying capacitor of sorts that stores energy it collects from electromagnetic sources like power lines. From what I have learned from listening to Coast to Coast , it is now possible to transmit radio signals along power lines. Some people spoke of hearing voices coming from running ACs on the show. Maybe it is listening in. We'll have to wait and see.
Yeah, the guy made this video based on a sighting of the craft in it. The guy who said he saw this thing in real life said it moved like a water bug. That is the weird part. First pics I saw were on coast to coast.
IN reading the other posts, I guess not everyone is up to date with the whole thing. I'm not going to tell them. Good job on this. I was in many discussions on how this might move. It's fun to see one idea on it in motion.
Way too many! And from too many sources who for one reason or another, don't want to come forward -- even without revealing their identity. If you saw something like this hovering over your house, would call the cops or take a picture and send it to a radio show? I mean, really???? I do beleive in UFOs, but don't believe this is one of them.
David I understand you say this video is fake, but I also heard Linda Moulton Howe from EarthfilesDOTcom say on C2CAM that she believed this video is real -so which is it? And can you please explain how exactly this video was faked, because it really looks like the object was there in the surrounding, and not just super imposed on the frames. PS: David you can get around being able to put email addresses here by changing spelling out the words, such as, DavidATYahooDOTcom.
I think you got my message, the 'video' is CGI...it is amazing what can be done...it's the "Drone/UFO" object in the photos under debate...I have full samples of pics at DGarrison722ataoldotcom.
read the comments from the maker of the video folks...IT'S THAT SIMPLE...VIDEO IS A FAKE...it is BASED on the Chad photos..which are still being investigated...too bad we cant post e-mail addresses here...or you cud reach me..
you only have proved how easy it is to fake videos and photos so any so-called ufo videos/photos will be discredited as just another photoshop job. This will only set back serious ufo investigation,everyone will try to out hoax the next hoaxer. Thanks alot!
lol its so funny to read the comments and then read the description of the video. whenever I need to be amused by complete ignorance, youtube is my remedy. Don't change people!
For it to be an example video, it looks pretty real...of course it's CG. I have my doubts about the craft, yes I believe in UFO's and all that, but if it were a UFO, why would it hang around the same area for a long period of time? And why would it fly low enough to let pictures be taken? Especially, if it were a real UFO, wouldn't the photographer have been poisoned by the radiation or something?
Thats exactly what came to my mind when I saw it. It looked like a remote model someone was playing around with or someone lifting it by wire. Then when he said CG I was skeptical of that because it looked like a solid object and I didn't figure the average person would be able to do that good of a job with CG. Not like it would be the first time someone said something on the net and it turned out to be a lie.
The photos of this thing are a hoax, plain and simple, already tonnes of photo analysts and debunkers have brought evidence forward showing it, and showing how it was done. There are already loads of photos of this craft over the net made by copycat artists showing how it easy it is to replicate, some of which were made in 5 minutes! Case closed!
Whoever wrote that, and made it look like my account, GO AWAY... it isn't funny.
I will post another video to prove it is a fake. I'm very upset about this. The photos.. maybe they are real.. but this video is a Computer Animation! Thats it.. full stop.
What's going on? Someone wrote the following and it wasn't me!
>think some of you have mistaken my comments, these pictures and video are not fake, they are real.
>There is no way I can make anyone believe they are real of fake, I just tell it like it is and it is up to each individual to believe whatever they will.
I DID NOT WRITE THIS!!! THIS VIDEO IS FAKE- IT IS COMPUTER ANIMATION- THE BACKGROUND IS A PHOTO, it isn't even video footage.
it surely is cool to watch even down to the shadow underneath the drone as it lifts off ground. the shadow is in sync with the object as it lifts and rotates
This is a miniature model of the real one. The real one is huge, the blades are at least 100' diameter. ... I really get my britches in a knot when people are working to create a hoax where there was no hoax. Chaiyah
I myself have never seen anything like that and the fact that it has what looks like some cryptic writing on it and a very bizzare thing on top leads me to believe that this is either E.T. technology or inter dimensional and that it's some kind of monitoring device of some sorts or used for abductions.
The eye witness who first brought this to attention on Coast To Coast said "it took off really fast" like a typical UFO, why isn't anyone talking about that, some kind of man made drone would not do that! How can we find the original photos posted on coast to coast?
go to earthfiles all the photos are there plus i have the photos that were on coast 2 coast saved on my computer. i probably could send them to you...but this site wont let me post my address
I have all the photos, and some that have been analyzed and blown up to show 3 UFO's in the clouds....wont let me post my e-mail address...but you can contact me here.
That would have taken an age to render. And to prove a point, I think this did very well ! My model was a quick cheap bonky version, but this looks like the real 'object' as we've been shown.
This is a very good rendering, but it doesn't move right when the camera moves. The frame should move around it similar to the background. The ufo almost moves with the camera.
What makes this design unique is that it uses a balancing ion arm which would disperse the ion stream off center making balancing possible. The craft could turn but the balancing arm would act more to create a side to side maneuver.
You did a great job here could you try animating this motion.
P.S. Keep in mind ion propulsion is not the same as ion drive engines which act as a thruster.
Coast Listeners look at Nikola Tesla's video on you tube.
How do you know this? Have you physically worked with the craft you speak of? Have you seen the design schematics? Have you worked firsthand with the technology you speak of? Can you prove any of your answers if they are in the positive?
Saladfinger123456, Nice job on the animation. However, just because your video might be a hoax video the images by chad and others brought forth in Linda's report are still valid sightings. Ion-crafts are real and that one of the issues we have with pure ion driven craft is the fluctuation of the magnetic field.
Hello everyone... This isn't real. I did it as part of an investigation as to the legitimacy of the original images supplied by 'Chad'. I'm trying to see at what point can we be convinced by CG images, and what are the things to look for when disseminating an image that could be 3D in origin.
LInda Moulton Howe and George Noory never seem to care if something is real or not, especially George...I can't believe anyone takes him seriously at all. So sad that he took over for Art, though even Art has lost his edge.
Linda, while you are on the air right now on 05-26-2007, on C2C you should make a formal retraction. Everybody who watches this video should understand that it is NOT a record of real events. It is a complete fabrication!
Linda Moulton Howe, George Noory, and all the rest of you Coast to Coast AM listeners, this video is FAKE! saladfingers123456, the person who posted this video, has explicitly stated that this video is a Computer Generated mock up! Check the information in the upper-right hand corner of this page. I cannot believe that Linda Mouton Howe reported this story to over 5 million listeners on C2C AM as being a real event. That is absolutely unacceptable and unpardonable!
Photos are one thing, and this video is another. Pay attention! The person who posted this video says that it is computer generated. Read his comments! And stop muddying the waters!
I'm curious to know if it is cg whats the purpous of putting it out all over the net, giving us only slight bits, could it be a movie publicity stunt, or is this thing real? if its real is it like the stealth bomber and they are trying to keep it as secret as they possibly can for specific reasons?
This has been flagged as spam show
True Free energy devices exist,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
intermitrj 1 year ago
why try fake it when you know there's good nasa footage
Ume2ofus 2 years ago
we need to anally probe Lil Marky Mark n the Funky Bunch...eat lettuce, fruit and plenty of dooshka, and we will commence the anal implants ,,we require Mother and Papa to observe lil dahlins....Rock,f--k it lets , oh lets get it own!
repelghosts 3 years ago
There is another video with the same setting, but a diffrent graphic "ship"
f7497 3 years ago
The original pictures may not have been proven fakes, but they most likely are.
The original hoaxster made the mistake of including Japanese Katakana lettering on his model. Maybe he thought it would pass for something alien, or maybe he is in fact Japanese. Either way, it's not alien.
v3dee 3 years ago
Or openmindsforum (google it)
saladfingers123456 3 years ago
ALIEN CASEBOOK - HOME <<<Google it. Serious biz. No hoaxes.
blueyeswise 3 years ago
To AOL viewers... The drone case has not been proved fake. You are a bit late to the discussion. The videos I have created were originally for the 'dronies' that have followed this story from a year ago! All videos of the drone are not real. The photos however are still undetermined as to their origin. If you want to join in the discussion, and get to the bottom of this, go to the OpenMindsForum (Google it) where there is a wealth of work on this subject. I am not the originator in any way. thx
saladfingers123456 3 years ago
Really? I saw on UFOs over Earth: Bucks County Flap on Discovery last week that the drone case, has in fact, been proven to be a hoax.
sniggity 3 years ago
on discovery... hahahahah, forget that shit man
radiatr99 2 years ago
how is call the software? is great!
DxSteve 4 years ago
now then, thats not a ufo cuz if it was where in gods great universe would the aliens fit in that piece of trash?
bawan1994 4 years ago
Nice graghics, i have to know how to do that! Well done
CocaCola0wnage 4 years ago
wow thats sick
6472743536 4 years ago
i dont get it is it a real ufo or like someone is controllin it?
6472743536 4 years ago
This is computer graphics. based upon an alleged real sighting.
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
i guess the one who saw it was abducted too!!!
kagian14 4 years ago
wheres the real video then?
phodo1 3 years ago
amazing.... I'm in CA till' August, and I hope to see one of those. I heard that there was one in Capatola? I'm in Santa Cruz. Any sightings near there? btw, I saw this vid on C2C
JaMeZiZbAcK 4 years ago
very weird these drones... nice job though!!
wxnut 4 years ago
The video responce you see above (or below) this text is of the recent 'Big Basin' sighting. I decided to see if I could give that one a blast. See what you think. Cheers
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
Ok I posted 2 video links on here of my CGI versions...or you can go to my page.
bord101 4 years ago
I am rendering a test shot right now with the model that is floating around out there. Just to play around! Should be posted on my page soon...
bord101 4 years ago
I truly, truly feel sorry for humanity at this point. All of the videos and pictures out of this object or variants are fakes the lighting is incorrect, the pixel junction, the texture work. I would bet my life and the life of my family that's how certain I am and I'm a amateur photoshop 3D modeler.
batmanthe 4 years ago 2
BTW I am a die hard believer in alien visitation.
batmanthe 4 years ago
same here
JaMeZiZbAcK 4 years ago
cgi is too good nowadays
corpser6666 4 years ago
I recognize this silly thing. I first seen it on that Gerge Noory radio show web page. I was one of those who knew it was CG as well. I'm glad to see someone making examples.
jasonrroberts099 4 years ago
If Saladboy can provide a video of the exact same motion of the flying wing deal in pre-render wireframe, and show successive CGI texture layering, only THEN will we believe he did it. (From a CGI expert who works at ILM that I know very well). The flying iron howver clearly does not have the required natural speculation, shadowing or texture matching that the flying wing babies do. If you can prove you did it in CGI, I have very lucrative job offer for you.
BlueNarwhal 4 years ago
You are serious? lol. Ok. not today though. I'm off to a friends birthday celebration.
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
Have you done it yet? That would put to rest all the conspiracy theorists. By the way, I take you at your word and think your video is fake- heck of a job. Not sure about the photos though my guess is they are as well.
asdffd 4 years ago
I am a computer animation expert. Obviously the author of this video has very good cg skills. What software did you use to create this video? How did you create the 3D model of the object? Did you mesh it yourself, by looking at the California photographs? Same question for textures on the drone (the alien-looking text, etc.)
pixelator30 4 years ago
Hi. I used Lightwave. Yep, I modelled the object from the photos myself. The alien text is just an approximation using a similar font. Do you work for a magazine or similar? Just wondering how you become a computer animation expert? (I mean that in all sincerity) cheers.
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
it doesn't move like in the description; "like a bug on water"... zip, zip, zip. this one just kind of does the obligatory spinning.
wavelength121 4 years ago
He must have a pretty powerful computer to "render" something like this.
darkzero63II 4 years ago
READ "Salad's" comment...He made the video to show what can be done with CGI...all you have to do is watch his "Iron Propulsion" video as proof. Also his NEW "Motion Study". DGarrison722ataoldotcom.
David722 4 years ago
I've just uploaded a second animation. This time I've tried to give it a different form of motion, that should hopefully match in with witness reports. I've not got it completely right, as the camera perhaps doesn't show the motion as well as I'd hoped. I'll see if I can find a better way of doing it.
Cheers
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
Yes it is a fake. When I created this, it was purely to show a few people over at the openmindsforum. I never expected such huge interest. If Linda on C2C hadn't said it was real, I don't think it would have been so widely seen. I'm not debinking anything, I'm just interested.
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
*debunking, not debinking :)
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
Nice work saladfingers. Good rotation but the objects center of gravity is slightly toward the long wing and it would be more energy efficient for the object to rotate around that center instead of the geometric center of the object, so it will seem as if it wobbles slightly. I made a similar video and am responding and need some advice and improvement. Thanks.
ultima3210 4 years ago
I don't entirely agree. Just because the tail wing is quite big and long, it doesn't make the centre of gravity shift toward it. If you study the images from Chad and co, the wing looks partly hollow down the edges. This tail could be quite light. Centre of gravity is defined by weight, not size.
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
But it's still a FAKE, right?
smellywilcox 4 years ago
So tell me why should ufo videos/photos ever be taken seriously again?
meteorlima 4 years ago
I dunno...maybe, go retro and use film? Like in the
good old days? :-)
Wal Mart Photo to the rescue??? ;-)
wireact 4 years ago
Somebody should try to build one of these things and
fly it, to see if it is even possible to do what has
been described. It may be possible, but the proof is
in the doing. Where's Jean L. Naudin when you really
need him?
wireact 4 years ago
I don't think it moves like this...I think the tail moves up and down.
allyousay 4 years ago
Really nice try. I know most would think it would rotate like that because the center is small but I would definitely believe the whole water bug flight style because it is kinda shaped like a dragon fly.
tardmatrix 4 years ago
I meant because the center is round. derrr
tardmatrix 4 years ago
If not a hoax, maybe it is a flying capacitor of sorts that stores energy it collects from electromagnetic sources like power lines. From what I have learned from listening to Coast to Coast , it is now possible to transmit radio signals along power lines. Some people spoke of hearing voices coming from running ACs on the show. Maybe it is listening in. We'll have to wait and see.
bowcatz 4 years ago
Yeah, the guy made this video based on a sighting of the craft in it. The guy who said he saw this thing in real life said it moved like a water bug. That is the weird part. First pics I saw were on coast to coast.
blueskies66 4 years ago
Looks like a radio controlled model to me.
Hubs88 4 years ago
why does it matter...its cgi....
runescape332 4 years ago
IN reading the other posts, I guess not everyone is up to date with the whole thing. I'm not going to tell them. Good job on this. I was in many discussions on how this might move. It's fun to see one idea on it in motion.
digitalnow 4 years ago
meteolima, who gives a fuck if you believe or not, what was it? too many christmas presents around the tree?
breadmaker99 4 years ago
Way too many! And from too many sources who for one reason or another, don't want to come forward -- even without revealing their identity. If you saw something like this hovering over your house, would call the cops or take a picture and send it to a radio show? I mean, really???? I do beleive in UFOs, but don't believe this is one of them.
marti0668 4 years ago
I totally agree with you!!
janedough66 4 years ago
David I understand you say this video is fake, but I also heard Linda Moulton Howe from EarthfilesDOTcom say on C2CAM that she believed this video is real -so which is it? And can you please explain how exactly this video was faked, because it really looks like the object was there in the surrounding, and not just super imposed on the frames. PS: David you can get around being able to put email addresses here by changing spelling out the words, such as, DavidATYahooDOTcom.
Nightbird 4 years ago
I think you got my message, the 'video' is CGI...it is amazing what can be done...it's the "Drone/UFO" object in the photos under debate...I have full samples of pics at DGarrison722ataoldotcom.
David722 4 years ago
read the comments from the maker of the video folks...IT'S THAT SIMPLE...VIDEO IS A FAKE...it is BASED on the Chad photos..which are still being investigated...too bad we cant post e-mail addresses here...or you cud reach me..
David722 4 years ago
you only have proved how easy it is to fake videos and photos so any so-called ufo videos/photos will be discredited as just another photoshop job. This will only set back serious ufo investigation,everyone will try to out hoax the next hoaxer. Thanks alot!
meteorlima 4 years ago
"This will only set back serious ufo investigation, everyone will try to out hoax the next hoaxer. Thanks alot!"
But isn't that what we've already experienced for over half a century?
smellywilcox 4 years ago
lol its so funny to read the comments and then read the description of the video. whenever I need to be amused by complete ignorance, youtube is my remedy. Don't change people!
seizethan1ght 4 years ago
For it to be an example video, it looks pretty real...of course it's CG. I have my doubts about the craft, yes I believe in UFO's and all that, but if it were a UFO, why would it hang around the same area for a long period of time? And why would it fly low enough to let pictures be taken? Especially, if it were a real UFO, wouldn't the photographer have been poisoned by the radiation or something?
oblivion916 4 years ago
Yeah. Screw George Noory and Coast to Coast AM. It's easy to see that those idiots are just that. Idiots.
Worker In The Light... Nah. Worker In The Bullshit is more like it.
HemoragiK 4 years ago
I'll never believe another ufo video again.
meteorlima 4 years ago
It looks like a window fan after a tornado. At best, maybe a toy.
marti0668 4 years ago
Thats exactly what came to my mind when I saw it. It looked like a remote model someone was playing around with or someone lifting it by wire. Then when he said CG I was skeptical of that because it looked like a solid object and I didn't figure the average person would be able to do that good of a job with CG. Not like it would be the first time someone said something on the net and it turned out to be a lie.
omnivos 4 years ago
Brilliant! Hats off!
Frobush 4 years ago
The photos of this thing are a hoax, plain and simple, already tonnes of photo analysts and debunkers have brought evidence forward showing it, and showing how it was done. There are already loads of photos of this craft over the net made by copycat artists showing how it easy it is to replicate, some of which were made in 5 minutes! Case closed!
Detachment3 4 years ago
Check out my other videos and watch the iron propulsion one. That will explain that this really is computer animation!
Thanks
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
saladfingers123456,
I hope you reported them to youtube abuse. Get their email address and spam them. LOL Can't wait for the next viedo. Keep up the good work.
sysprime 4 years ago
the space beings are real.
fistsofsteel5 4 years ago
Ain't America great? Any random moron can do whatever he wants, for a while. Even become king. For a while.
bartislartfast 4 years ago
If you look at their profile, it says they are from the United States.. I'm in the UK. Why do people do that. Grow up!
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
Thanks for clearing that up Saladfingers123456, some people.... well, you know! ;-)
OMufonaut 4 years ago
OK, I've realised what they did...
They opened an account with a name very similar
My name is saladf>i<ngers123456
His name is saladf>l<ngers123456
They used an l instead of an i. That is very sad. Don't believe anything that person says. Thanks
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
Whoever wrote that, and made it look like my account, GO AWAY... it isn't funny.
I will post another video to prove it is a fake. I'm very upset about this. The photos.. maybe they are real.. but this video is a Computer Animation! Thats it.. full stop.
Thanks
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
What's going on? Someone wrote the following and it wasn't me!
>think some of you have mistaken my comments, these pictures and video are not fake, they are real.
>There is no way I can make anyone believe they are real of fake, I just tell it like it is and it is up to each individual to believe whatever they will.
I DID NOT WRITE THIS!!! THIS VIDEO IS FAKE- IT IS COMPUTER ANIMATION- THE BACKGROUND IS A PHOTO, it isn't even video footage.
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
It inst'n fake, it's real but this is only lifter, not UFO :D check that in google :)))
Ropek2 4 years ago
it surely is cool to watch even down to the shadow underneath the drone as it lifts off ground. the shadow is in sync with the object as it lifts and rotates
magnum6604 4 years ago
Also, I agree the pics and video are real, I'm watching it. But, I'm watching a very real manufactured video. Not a real event captured on video.
sysprime 4 years ago
I wonder if you could zoom in on a window with the right equipment to see if theres a reflection?
omnivos 4 years ago
Or maybe a tiny alien inside?
marti0668 4 years ago
lol... you think there is a little alien inside. hehe
omnivos 4 years ago
I would be more likely to believe that it was supported buy a wire than CG but ok whatever.
So any speculation as to how this thing could fly if not for wire or special effect?
Those blades at the top spinning at high speeds creating some kind of lift?
omnivos 4 years ago
there has been too many eye witness reports of this drone for it NOT to be real. It is NOT photoshop--tests are conclusive
sugaree53 4 years ago
what tests? You've seen test results? It aint the photo we're concerned with, it's what's IN the photo.
David722 4 years ago
put dot com after earthfiles i couldnt write it the right way
sugaree53 4 years ago
casts a nice shadow on the concrete.
omnivos 4 years ago
So does Wile E. Coyote.
bartislartfast 4 years ago
In an effort to clear things up more, I will soon post more pictures of this thing.
Just have some patience and they will all be forthcoming...
saladflngers123456 4 years ago
This is a miniature model of the real one. The real one is huge, the blades are at least 100' diameter. ... I really get my britches in a knot when people are working to create a hoax where there was no hoax. Chaiyah
Chaiyah88 4 years ago
this is being discussed at openmindsforum com
lucianarchy 4 years ago
lol! That's making it confusing Saladfingers!
saladfingers123456(7 hours ago)Hello everyone... This isn't real. the link saladfingers says the discussion is at is
openmindsforum com search for the board 'aliens and exobiology' then 'ufo up close and detailed'
lucianarchy 4 years ago
I myself have never seen anything like that and the fact that it has what looks like some cryptic writing on it and a very bizzare thing on top leads me to believe that this is either E.T. technology or inter dimensional and that it's some kind of monitoring device of some sorts or used for abductions.
DNAChallenge 4 years ago
The eye witness who first brought this to attention on Coast To Coast said "it took off really fast" like a typical UFO, why isn't anyone talking about that, some kind of man made drone would not do that! How can we find the original photos posted on coast to coast?
DNAChallenge 4 years ago
go to earthfiles all the photos are there plus i have the photos that were on coast 2 coast saved on my computer. i probably could send them to you...but this site wont let me post my address
sugaree53 4 years ago
I have all the photos, and some that have been analyzed and blown up to show 3 UFO's in the clouds....wont let me post my e-mail address...but you can contact me here.
David722 4 years ago
WHERE I CAN BUY THAT ONE?
gosiaosiecka 4 years ago
Saladfingers,
I wish I could make something like this. Nice job! Next time make a longer video. Even thoug it is manufactured, it is fun to watch.
sysprime 4 years ago
That would have taken an age to render. And to prove a point, I think this did very well ! My model was a quick cheap bonky version, but this looks like the real 'object' as we've been shown.
Very Well Done !!
sn0rch 4 years ago
This is a very good rendering, but it doesn't move right when the camera moves. The frame should move around it similar to the background. The ufo almost moves with the camera.
MikeSkullman 4 years ago
Hmmm.......just before "liftoff," I can't see the top
electrodes on the backside. It's as if they "aren't
there" (read, "not drawn in"). The front ones seem
simply to "appear" at the left, go to the right, and
then disappear (although I do detect what appears to
be the "flutter effect" of electrodes passing in front
of electrodes once it's "off the ground." Not bad for
a "fake video."
wireact 4 years ago
Sorry, don't look like CGI to me.
RUT788 4 years ago
What makes this design unique is that it uses a balancing ion arm which would disperse the ion stream off center making balancing possible. The craft could turn but the balancing arm would act more to create a side to side maneuver.
You did a great job here could you try animating this motion.
P.S. Keep in mind ion propulsion is not the same as ion drive engines which act as a thruster.
Coast Listeners look at Nikola Tesla's video on you tube.
ColoradoCaveMan 4 years ago
How do you know this? Have you physically worked with the craft you speak of? Have you seen the design schematics? Have you worked firsthand with the technology you speak of? Can you prove any of your answers if they are in the positive?
castlerabbit 4 years ago
Ion propulsion has been in use by NASA since 1960.
Many experimenters have been working out the bugs for Iono-Crafts for decades. These images fit into the present theoretical design.
Take a look at the videos too. These are real experimental applied voltage models.
appliedelectrogravitics(dot)com
ColoradoCaveMan 4 years ago
Saladfinger123456, Nice job on the animation. However, just because your video might be a hoax video the images by chad and others brought forth in Linda's report are still valid sightings. Ion-crafts are real and that one of the issues we have with pure ion driven craft is the fluctuation of the magnetic field.
ColoradoCaveMan 4 years ago
I'd send you a link to the discussion, but youtube wont let me. pfff typical
p.s. Linda, I think you should tell everyone it isnt real.. and the reason I created it.
BTW where can I hear this radio show? Thanks!
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
Hello everyone... This isn't real. I did it as part of an investigation as to the legitimacy of the original images supplied by 'Chad'. I'm trying to see at what point can we be convinced by CG images, and what are the things to look for when disseminating an image that could be 3D in origin.
saladfingers123456 4 years ago
LInda Moulton Howe and George Noory never seem to care if something is real or not, especially George...I can't believe anyone takes him seriously at all. So sad that he took over for Art, though even Art has lost his edge.
almostcertaindeath 4 years ago
Linda, while you are on the air right now on 05-26-2007, on C2C you should make a formal retraction. Everybody who watches this video should understand that it is NOT a record of real events. It is a complete fabrication!
castlerabbit 4 years ago
Once again, you jump to conclusions without studying the evidence!
DNAChallenge 4 years ago
Linda Moulton Howe, George Noory, and all the rest of you Coast to Coast AM listeners, this video is FAKE! saladfingers123456, the person who posted this video, has explicitly stated that this video is a Computer Generated mock up! Check the information in the upper-right hand corner of this page. I cannot believe that Linda Mouton Howe reported this story to over 5 million listeners on C2C AM as being a real event. That is absolutely unacceptable and unpardonable!
castlerabbit 4 years ago
Obviously you aren't paying attention, there are eye witness accounts and photos of the object!
DNAChallenge 4 years ago
Photos are one thing, and this video is another. Pay attention! The person who posted this video says that it is computer generated. Read his comments! And stop muddying the waters!
castlerabbit 4 years ago
I'm curious to know if it is cg whats the purpous of putting it out all over the net, giving us only slight bits, could it be a movie publicity stunt, or is this thing real? if its real is it like the stealth bomber and they are trying to keep it as secret as they possibly can for specific reasons?
teppers 4 years ago
thats amazing, how does it work?
omnivos 4 years ago
Yeah..CG...right! *wink* *wink*
sentinel627 4 years ago