Banks Know About Your Strawman (Here's Some Proof)

[benaharris]

whats the point?

[TheBlinksum18241]

Baqashar, please don't ever let your videos go down. Yours are some of the best I've ever seen as far as not being able to rebutt what you are showing seeing how it is right out of the horses mouth. If the Banks or corporations you call don't deny any of this, how can the ignorant man who tries to say you are wrong? Please make more if possible too, these truly are great videos in many aspects.

[AnotherGlenn]

I've not been to court, either. Once at a bank, the teller asked me about the way I signed. She was concerned by my answer, so she waved over her supervisor and we had an illuminating conversation about who I was. She had me enter the PIN, again. I mentioned the way I had signed the original agreement. They both looked stunned. The supervisor went to the manager, and came back with the okay.

That was an inevitable, accidental experiment. A learning experience. I test truths, carefully.

:)

[maximumrule]

I don't think that the bank can be legally bound by any advice given by one of its employees. In other words the IRS agent can give you incorrect information but the IRS is not bound by anthing the employee has told you.

[shao9x9]

Are you are writing the cheques out to "CASH"? Otherwise if you're handing these cheques over to small businesses aren't you just cheating another human being? I think you got the revolution a bit twisted...

[Bashanvibe]

jpwbass@gmail.com

[alilprincess22]

are you saying we can write a check and not be responsible for the payment of that check because we are not the actual person who's name is on the check? we are just an agent acting on behalf of the name on the check?

[baqashar]

@alilprincess22

You are correct

[Gryphyn3]

@alilprincess22 Yes but you need to disassociate yourself from your strawman or separate yourself from it .. to do that you have to file some forms into the public records. Otherwise they "Assume" you are the strawman. This is why in the vid he is saying he is a man and not the entity. Which is also why he very clearly separated himself from the strawman to the banker.

[MsCandisStacked]

Did you take it to court?

[baqashar]

@MsCandisStacked

Haven't been charged yet

[desertdwllr]

The banking lady is just agreeing to get rid of dude, what the heck is a bank teller going to know about this stuff. i spoke to my bank manager and she wasn't aware of this stuff.

[914light]

*their ..small business

[914light]

Yes banks know about names on accounts ...many open accounts in there ..small business name ...kids name or open an account with someone else on it ...they are aware of the name thing ...and I have never had anyone at any bank be that nice to me when they did NOT understand !!

[baqashar]

Anyone disagreeing with the video's information deserves to get thrown into a fema camp, tortured, exterminated and burnt up by nuclear missiles after getting blocked - just a heads up!

[CORRIGEEN71]

are you stupid bank staff have no idea about this espec a nigga customer and nigga bank clerk

[veeeforvendetta]

WHo is/was the principle ... if you the man are the agent ??

[herviews]

Sorry, the person was only saying "yes" to acknowledge that she is listening to the caller ; not necessarily agreeing with the caller. The caller needed to ask specific questions that required her to give specific answers.

[baqashar]

@herviews

What evidence do you have to prove that? Did she tell you that? 

[baqashar]

@herviews

Are you a mind reader?

[herviews]

@baqashar Just using discernment and viewing from a different perspective to come to this conclusion - which could be just as wrong as your conclusion. Many people just say yes, including myself, to indicate that they are listening to the speaker.

[USSalkaselsior]

@baqashar No one is reading minds here...It's just obvious if you listen to the conversation. From the machine that answered the call at the beginning, you can tell that this is like the 800 number on the back of a debit card. This woman isn't even a "banker," she's a customer service representative.  From what you said, to her it probably just sounded like you were checking to make sure that you're the only one that was allowed to use your checks. Of course she'd say yes.

[withwingsaseagleeyes]

@baqashar I'm sure the person isn't or even those who agree with a thumbs up, but the same would have to be for you as well. Considering not all the yes statements meant agreement as we know people do say "yes" as in chat one does with ".." to show listening or rather reading.

It would be good for future reference to keep in mind when digging into other peoples minds for answers.

I've listened to many of your videos and I have to say well done with how you came about to find answers.

[Gluchyon]

@herviews Sorry, the listener(banker) answered yes in compliance to foreknown statutes of her' operating bank concurring with the caller's questions. The period they had the caller on hold was used to position themselves accordingly to deal with an atypical customer. They both played chess well.

[OliOzzie]

Fuck yeah love it, "i'm about to use a cheque book" lol

[VoreTechz1985]

Not to dumb down the point you were trying to make. But this dumb broad just sounded like a "Yes-Man". She didn't really have anything to say about what you were trying to convey. It sounded like she just wanted to get off the phone because she was too ignorant to know what you are talking about. 99.9% of all bank employees do not even know how the system actually works. They are just trained to know what they need to know to deal with ignorant people that have blinders over their eyes.

[TheCrawfordgroup]

Baqashar keep up the good work bro! Love your work!

[baqashar]

Don't you have bills to pay and 'money' to work for? What are people "innocent" of ?

[119supersniper]

Court is where you seek remedy. Not harassing innocent people just trying to get on in life at their work place. Apologies for the long post. I hope this clears things up a little for those not quite into this freeman crap !

[119supersniper]

I am in my conveyance of the day. RUbbish. It is not true. The defence is....I am not operating under a commercial licence and performing commercial business for money (ie. Taxi cab, bus driving, truck driving etc)..and therefore not being paid as a government employee under LICENCE (driving Licence).Therefore, any laws regarding my driving are not applicable with regard to misdemeanours (minor traffic violations BUT you would not argue this with the Police. Seek remedy in court.

[119supersniper]

Also, you do have a name. john smith or whatever. You are not however MR JOHN SMITH ( Entitlement through the use of MR ...not CAPS). You are known by a name...of course you are. You were born on a certain day...of course you were.......denying it is just plain stupid. Freemen are not that free as they tangle themselves in illusion and misdirection and fool no o one but themslves. This is why they largely fail in all aspects especially when they say I am not driving a vehicle con't

[119supersniper]

I have been doing this 'freeman' stuff for many years. 99% of these vids are simply wrong ! they are out of context and misinformed. Yes hidden contracts exist (silent adhesion contracts etc). Your remedy is through the court via Law of Title, Equity and contract' not here on youtube. You are merely confusing people and egotistical. No one understands your point and merely reinforces the Maxim that a little knowledge is dangerous.

[nasamanharry]

Proves fuck all.

She didn't even know what you were talking about She just wanted off the line.

Because you made it as boring as all fuck.

[baqashar]

@nasamanharry

Pay your debts boy!

[giroyagetme]

@nasamanharry she clearly knew what he was talking about do u even interact with other humanz ?

[lopytube]

@giroyagetme

Yeah this info was know to me before Obama was placed in office but what still gets me is how causal she is about it.

I'm not expecting her to cheese and grin about it with a big hollar.But its not often that a"number""strawman"comes out and say I'm not a strawman anymore.

There a very tiny part of me that thinks she doesnt know what hes talkin bout.

At the same time she sounds like she knows whats going on

[VojvodinaNet]

search for 'hidden contracts', a lot is explained there

[kldirectv2]

LOL,

U CALLED AFTER 5:00 PM;

The bank was closed, and;

You got the cleaning lady

[MrDontuo]

Is he the man with no name...who road a horse with no name?....So do we call him...Hey you?

Or dude!?... Dude!...I'm guessing you're a dude by the deep voice...but then there are a lot of deep voiced bitches...So now I'm confused...Are you a dude or a bitch? What do we call you now if you don't have a name? Guy..Girl..Man..Woman?

[baqashar]

@MrDontuo

are you one of those devils that's written of in Scripture?

[MrDontuo]

@baqashar I am the one! I will reek havoc upon your life as your soul will soon belong to me! ...Or it could be I'm just asking...If you have no name how do you want people to address you?...If I'm confusing you...It's just the nature of my game!

[mlm1025]

wow please can you elaberate for me...I am understanding and in aawww at the new found information I have been researching. Please comment back to me, id like to get clear understanding so I may stand tall in redeeming my strawman title or whatever the hell they call their selves trying to pull over our i.e. my eyes. Im not stupid and a lot of questions have pondered in my mind for years. finally,...answers that are making sense !!!! pist off but humbly seeking the truth. peace to all.

[baqashar]

Why say what instead of asking questions?

[NIKONGUY1960]

Say what?

[joshuamiller79]

So what happens if I go to court & say I am not a name (as in JOSHUA) but I am a person? I don't quite get the point.

[baqashar]

@joshuamiller79

explore the channel. its about asking questions. not making statements which is arguing.

[bwood600]

did you ever go to court ? did everything work out ?

[baqashar]

@bwood600

never had to go to court over the situation

[TheBoogiemaster]

Yes it would and it also would give me leverage in all my claims. No one can claim ownership of my STRAWMAN or anything with my name on it I file a criminal complaint for violations of 13th amendment, usc codes, and international rights violations. I will say this and imma leave it alone. Everything that I learned about the redemption movement early on in my process for freedom didnt all pan out. Some of it was straight up bullshit and alot of it was incomplete inacurate and misleading.

[TheBoogiemaster]

Ok have a nice day

[TheBoogiemaster]

Each State has its own Constitution and laws. We say constitution but we dont specify whether US or State of?.....One would have to take the original State constitution and its laws for the people.

[baqashar]

@TheBoogiemaster

stop claiming that something is 'yours' when it not. a citizen of the state of ohio is like unto one of keebler's elfs.

and "the people" legally do not exist.

military industrial complex recieves first benefit from commercial use of the NAME.

the Name that you are called by was SUBMITTED to gov't, not you. regardless of what paperwork you do concerning it, your us of the NAME and currency is a privilege granted to the public.

But believe what you wish. They won't tell u.

[kdcruz75]

@baqashar

i saw ur video on the new york vital statistics ...you need to send notice to the department to find who the present assignee to application of live berth is ..

when ur mother declared particulars of her water cell ur soul occupies ..she also created a trust to hold that res...the present assignee tracks the debit entry on the asset side of hte account ..because ur mother did not get paid for her labour ..this is the international side.

is it the DTCC, or the queen

[kdcruz75]

@kdcruz75

one thing that is defintie as per shipping law..is that the receipt that is the borth certificate still pertains to the vital statistics of the water cell on the date of the birth ..even if it is 2011 the birth certifcate points to the goods of those dimensions and weight declared to the doctor of admiralty..

u are right they cannot see us only the account of the birth trust

[TheBoogiemaster]

I have suffered no one drawback related to the STRAWMAN that I refer to. I am only expressing that which I know and believe. As far as owing on the Public Debt... I owe no man nothing in life. I have absolutely ZERO debt. I also have my STRAWMAN registered in the US Securities and Exchange Commision. I think the problem with the US and its people is that we dont quite understand the seperation of powers. My STRAWMAN is the US citizen. I am a citizen of the State of Ohio.

[TheBoogiemaster]

Once you do this You can go open up a business account in the name of the STRAWMAN, put all your money in that account because no creditor can levy that account. Its in the account of the Employer. We dont know how to become the Employer. the only drawback on doing this is the fact that checks in your name will have to be deposited in the account instead of being cashed because its a business account but i kept the regular account open with only 25 dollars in it for cashing checks.

[baqashar]

@TheBoogiemaster

I would suggest that you listen to some more videos from baqashar because only those who claim ownership of the legal NAME suffer the "drawbacks". You believe that you own the legal NAME and the currency 'in it'?

Then 'pay up' your portion of the nat'l debt.

learn what the fictions are. who can legally force their beliefs on you?

[jamesfk77]

@TheBoogiemaster Wouldn't that then make you liable for taxes?

[TheBoogiemaster]

Unless it is a Commercial Banker they have not a clue to what you are talking about. If you want to take control of your STRAWMAN do this. Call the IRS and tell them you to give you a EIN number. They will ask you for your social security number. Give it to them. They will ask you for the name of the business. Tell them the name as it appears on your ID or Drivers License. They will ask you for business type. tell them sole proprietor. Now You own HIM. Try it I did.

[buddybleau]

I am no lawyer. But I think they have a very good reason for dealing with the strawman. If for some reason you should commit fraud and the bank gets you convicted of the crime, whatever the amount of the money involved will be given to the bank under government bonding (insurance) on behalf of the strawman. Or something like that. I'm sort of ate up with dumbass when it comes to such matters. But it's the only reason I can think of.

[MoorishArchives]

I already send Ret Squid the research and law on the all caps name. Whoever it is is just trolling for attention. He came to our channel with the same mistaken and misguided arguments.

It happens like that.

[baqashar]

@MoorishArchives

some people just don't get it. That the NAME is a legal person, legal meaning created and authorized by law.

[MoorishArchives]

scribd.com/doc/6967949

[1allstarman]

Whao Dude ! thanks for the link and the awesome article on the subject! you da man !

[sickasso72]

I totally support what you believe in .... because I do as well. But saying this is proof when your talking to some young lady that was hired as an 8$ an hour bank teller isnt. She has NO idea what your talking about. She was saying yes to expedite the conversation so she could get to other calls.

[baqashar]

@sickasso72

how do you know she makes $8/hr and has no idea of what Im talking about? where is your evidence?

[MoorishArchives]

@sickasso72 Bank employees who deal with any level of financial transactions with the public HAVE to to have some understanding about NAMEs, signatures and endorsements in order to identify errors, fraud and liability issues resulting from same.

Specious arguments based on "what you heard"or "that is seems like that would be the case" are a disservice to you learning the truth of how things work and why.

No disrespect, but it is apparent that you are not speaking on a factual basis.

[sickasso72]

@MoorishArchives As I said before I am in total agreement with you on soveriegnty, birth cert bonds, cap. names as corporate fiction, and so on. I just dont think this woman was far enough up the food chain to really know or be interested in what you were talking about. I will have to go to my bank and see about speaking with district manager--- or someone who calls the shots

[RetSquid]

There is no strawman unless YOU create it.

An "all caps name" is no different than a title caps name or a no caps name. Capital letters have no legal meaning.

[baqashar]

@RetSquid

If that's so, then what is your explanation for the authorized signature line on 'personal checks'?

Are you an experienced banker? do you have professional knowledge of banking?

[RetSquid]

@baqashar

What about the signature line? That is the signature of the person authorized to sign the check, either the owner of the account or someone they allow to sign for them.

No, I'm not a banker, neither am I some kind of conspiracy theorist who thinks that there is some super-secret plan for people to own you by spelling your name with capital letters. If you like I can post a few cases that say capital letter names are no different that title caps names.

[baqashar]

@RetSquid

well, who's authorizing the owner to sign on that line?

who is the owner?

what evidence do you have that proves the NAME you're using is yours?

are you the author of the NAME? are you the authority over the use of the NAME?

If you're not a professional banker, how can you disagree with with the professional banker's answers?

are you in possession of a 'government issued document' that designates you as the owner of a capital or title caps name?

[RetSquid]

@baqashar

1. You are the owner and that means you are the authorized one.

2. Whoever's name is on the account.

3. What proof do you have that my name is not my name?

4. How can you be an author of a name? But yes, I am the authority for use of my name.

5. First, what professional banker? Second, easily, if he does not know what he is doing.

6. The capitalization of a name has no legal meaning.

[baqashar]

@RetSquid

1 what evidence ypou have of that? who's authorizing you if you are the owner?

2 well, who's name is on the account?

3 how can you rebut the certificate of birth as evidence? did you create the name and authorize it's use?

4 you think names don't have authors? what does author mean?

5 the banker in the video was professional, don't you think?

[baqashar]

@RetSquid

6 a) can you show us a picture of a gravestone or tombstone with a name that is not in all capital letters? b) are you a name? c) what evidence do you have that you are authorized to use a name as personal identification?

[RetSquid]

@baqashar

6. a. Google 'tombstones' and look down to the images and look at the first one.

b. No I am not a name, I have a name.

c. What evidence do you have that I NEED any authorization?

[baqashar]

@RetSquid

6a) how wack is that for proof? b) so how can you use a name as personal identification if it's not you? how can you prove that you "have" it? c) so you're admitting that your use of that name is unauthorized then?

[RetSquid]

@baqashar

You asked "can you show us a picture of a gravestone or tombstone with a name that is not in all capital letters?"

I showed you. now what?

The name describes me as an entity. Who needs to authorise me to use what is mine already?

[RetSquid]

The "name" is not a entity, it's just a descriptor of YOU.

[baqashar]

@RetSquid

but is the name you?

[RetSquid]

@baqashar

I am neither a sound nor letters, but those sounds and letters identify me to others and allow them to communicate with me.

[USSalkaselsior]

@RetSquid Thank you! Finally a dose of common sense in these comments. You have a name so people can address you. What's so confusing about that? It's as if I was to say to baqashar: Would you like a glass of water? He then would immediately throw a fit and start screaming about how it's impossible, because "water" is just the authorized set of sounds to use when referring to actual water! Then he'd ask if I was working for the government and if I was TRYING to dehydrate him.

[AceOfHeart2012]

Here's how I see it. Those who desire freedom are a class. The government's anti-Sovereign'Freeman rhetoric slandering in the media, we who want to hold THEM accountable, by labeling us as "anti-government extremists, right-wing wackos and fringe lunatics" is nothing short of a hate crime. We should seek an attorney (with balls) who can co-counsel a class (Sovereigns) action lawsuit or file hate crime charges against the U.S. GOVERNMENT. We are the injured party. Spread the word. Let's go!

[Echelon2600]

I've already gotten several courts to admit that (a) a "legal name" and a "lawful name" are not the same thing, and (b) a lawful name is the name by which a man is called while a legal name is a name of a "legal person" exactly as defined by Black's 8th:

LEGAL PERSON. See artificial person.

Furthermore, I've gotten those courts to acknowledge that I am a man in contradistinction to a legal person, and admit that the name they have on their cases is the name of the legal person, and not me.

[baqashar]

@TheLawandTheProphets

if it's meant to be, it will be.

[kiimora]

i think she was just yesing you to death to get you off the phone.

[baqashar]

@kiimora

Why would you think that?

I don't doubt that you are free to think that way -

I would advise you do research for yourself the information brought out in the video.

Why doubt when you haven't confirmed otherwise?

Love

[AceOfHeart2012]

UCC 3-402 § 3-402. SIGNATURE BY REPRESENTATIVE. Particularly note (b) (2) says it all. Google it. I signed a sigbond thus facing a charge of 'obstructing and resisting'. Facing a $10,000 fine and 9 months in jail when the D.A. got a hold of that worthless (no body to hold as surety) bond he offered to reduce the charge down to a $5 Ordinance Violation, $125.30 court costs + a letter of apology to the shewiff (which I waved and just did the letter) which looked like 4 monkeys had written it.

[baqashar]

@AceOfHeart2012

It all comes down to them relying on us to volunteer to be recognized by/as the NAME or for our consent to use the NAME (certificate of birth) as personal ID -

Yes, Im familiar with the cde. It helped clear up alot for me before I called the banker.

[gg6394]

Wow

[Ruthli55Apo5tle]

That's right!!!!!!!!!!!!!