MORE "HOT & SEXY" SUPERMODELS TAKE IT OFF FOR CLIMATE CHANGE: Response to mccainisthrough

[jerbiebarb]

You won't care about increased potato growth when the climate gets more unstable. LoL

[UTubekookdetector]

JER: Increased CO2 levels are called, "the greening of planet earth." In addition, somehow the planet continued on when CO2 levels were 4 times today's levels.

In another response to McStupid I went over evidence from Antarctica, severing the link between higher CO2 causing higher temps. The temp was higher in Antarctica 650K years ago, yet CO2 and methane levels were lower.

CO2 isn't the boogeyman your simplistic notions make it out to be.

[jerbiebarb]

@UTubekookdetector

There's plenty of CO2 now, more won't help significantly.

Nobody cares about 650k years ago. Humans weren't blocking any recovery from greenhouse conditions back then. Why are old warming episodes relevant?

[UTubekookdetector]

JER: By admitting that there were periods that were much hotter undercuts your argument for anthropogenic climate change. You do realize you just refuted yourself?

There's only 25% the amount of CO2 now than there was about 300 mln years ago.

Nobody cares about 650K years ago? Seriously? That's your pitch?

[jerbiebarb]

@UTubekookdetector

Nobody disputes that warm episodes have occurred thousands of years ago. Do you want to go back to those conditions?

300 Mya continents and forests and deserts and oceans were in a different configuration. How strong was the Sun?

We care about recovery from the effects of human activity NOW and in the coming centuries.

[UTubekookdetector]

JER: You've basically agreed with the evidence I've presented in this video and by your own words, you undercut your own argument. If you're wondering about how strong the Sun it, you've realized what a lot of AGW proponents don't, the Sun influences climate a lot more than people realize.

Your comment about the effects of human activity NOW is your poor attempt to sweep away the evidence for massive climate change before the automobile. You're not off to a good start.

[jerbiebarb]

@UTubekookdetector

This is not ego game with me. If you think you've won something I'm glad I'm helping you feel better about yourself. I'm a meteorologist, this isn't a personal crusade for me. We've had a blip of cooling, please offer some science that AGW theory has been falsified. I'm not a climatologist, but I use their NWP products daily, so I can speak out of school as they say..

[UTubekookdetector]

JER: Actually, Phil Jones just recently admitted (remember, he was the guy "losing" data at CRU) that the earth may have not warmed since 1995.

Please give us some evidence for an anthropogenic cause pertaining to CO2 levels being 4 times today's levels 300 mln years ago.

Imagine if a presidential candidate got up during a debate and said this is not an ego game. Of course, you're always trying to refute your opponent. You certainly whine a lot.

[plantpanther]

Mccainisthrough reminds me of keith olbermann. Throws out facts ( alleged facts) but will never debate anyone on it. One question kook, has she ever made a response video to you?

[UTubekookdetector]

mccainisthrough has made some very poor attempts to respond to me in her vids, but NEVER mentions me by name.

She's removed a few videos I've responded to and changed the titles of several others to avoid mine coming up in related vid results.

[fargenacle]

Congratulations. You just spent 6minutes an 40 seconds explaining what every second grader knows. Plants absorb co2. Thanks for wasting 6 minutes and 40 seconds of my life captain obvious.

[UTubekookdetector]

Welcome back Farty. Anything in the above vid you'd like to dispute. What did you think of the evidence from UC-Davis that CO2 levels were at 2,000 PPM levels in the distant past.

I'm glad to know I'm still sticking in your craw Fart. Keep the comments coming little man.

[fargenacle]

How can I dispute that plants absorb co2? It's a fact! I just can't believe your just now getting it. I've known about photosynthesis for over 45 years! Did you also know that we exhale co2? And the plants make oxygen? Wow isn't that eye opening. Now tell the corporatists to stop cutting down the forests so we all can breath. And tell Brad that if he lived in a world with nothing but co2 that he would be physically dead. Hell he's already brain dead.

[UTubekookdetector]

So you're conceding the point that CO2 levels of over 2,000 PPM have occurred yet life somehow managed to continue unabated?

You're only being facetious Fart because you're flustered. You might want to take some time off bub.

[fargenacle]

I'm not conceding anything because there's nothing to concede. I don't know what the co2 levels were at at one time because i haven't done an atmospheric study of past air quality. I'm told by scientists that at one time co2 levels were high and plants absorbed the co2. then they died and rotted and turned into oil which we now pump out of the ground and put back into the air.

[UTubekookdetector]

It was more than just plants and I wouldn't say the rotted, they were subjected to massive amounts of heat and pressure.

I provided a link on the right side to a UC-Davis study showing we had CO2 levels of 2,000 PPM. That pretty much undermines mccainisthrough's entire cut-and-paste video.

[BRADMAXXX]

Maybe we should let the moonbats believe co2 is bad.. Now how do we convince them to all stop breathing?

[QuartuvLarry]

When asked to refute this video, mccainisthrough took one look and said "I don't know how! It's all Greek to me!"

[UTubekookdetector]

Nice to see you again Larry, it's been a while. Keep this on the low-low, but most of mccainisthrough's "sources" have coloring areas. Shhh!

[paulvick2002]

I watched McStupids video too. I swear theres nothing that Liberals wouldn't stoop to to further their agendas.

[bulldogs3159]

AWESOME!!!!

[myangels7]

I wonder how much longer mccainisthrough can remain an accomplice in the Global Warming hoax. Al Gore is being sued by 30,000 scientists who say he is a fraud. Now we have even more proof of the GW scam...Can you say ClimateGate?! LMAO... gotta love those hackers!

5*****

[UTubekookdetector]

You're right, their argument pertaining to consensus is falling apart. It's an argument that's only used by losers anyways.

If everyone believed the sun revolved around the earth, that wouldn't make it true. Thanks for watching.

[3slimdog]

Interesting video utube.

[UTubekookdetector]

Thanks and pass it on. McCainisthrough needs to be held accountable for her errors concering climate change.