Why can't people see all the lies that MSNBC presents? Coffeebaggers/Democrats/MSNBC and poop have a lot in common. They smell and no one cares about them or listen to them.
hahahahaha the day their ratings dry up... its funny that you say that ramblebar because in this day and age keith is off air for corruption and fox news is the most watched news channel. hahahahaha
the only thing that's missing from this video is if keith went "hey HEY hey!" at the end and put two thumbs up, then pointed at the screen and said "Fox News!" with the biggest smile he could.... then flipped off the world.
One thing I like about marijuana. The feel of leaving reality. It seems its always someone else who comes at me with racism. Rather if its, someone alerting me of a racist, someone coming to me with racist remarks, etc. I never actually think anyone is racist or doing racist things, untill someone purely shows me. See, I can get over the racial barrier. Now its time for everyone else to follow.
When I looked up "Keith Olbermann" on Youtube (relevance based), the first hit was "Keith Olbermann Neuters Bill O'Reilly" and the second was "Keith Olbermann Special Comment on Health Care Reform". The third was "Keith Olbermann - 8 years in 8 minutes".
This is followed by positive videos related to Olbermann's show.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Keith Olbermann is a transparent tool. Couldn't cut it on ESPN as a sports announcer, yet holds himself out as a source of political and other commentary. Quite sad, really, that MSNBC couldn't find someone better to front their agenda.
Why do you Christians seek to forcibly impose your messiah on me and people like me? (IE, not interested in your blind faith)
As blunt as I can put it, in the words of a certain rock star; "Your Messiah was Never Mine."
(points for those that figure out who said that)
On topic however, I do find it quite amusing how quick connies are to try and paint people who expose thier little lies and games to be heathens, traitors, etc - when its the Connies doing the most damage. Go figure.
Oooooo, someone's a super-genius. I know you like to feel smart because you have a thesaurus with you at all times, but it doesn't make you smart. Once again, a conservative ignores the main point and goes straight to a baseless personal attack. My point, if you could read deeper than the individual words, was that your premise is flawed. Those who are deserving of worst persons, get it.
You believe there are words in that message that aren't used every day? Wow. BTW, understanding analogies does require intelligence. Not understaning them means you're dumb.
"baseless personal attack"
It wasn't baseless.
"your premise is flawed"
It wasn't a premise, it was a hypothetical designed to illustrate a point. A point which you're incapable of understanding, or didn't bother trying to because your Olbie-type hate got in the way.
"Jesus Christ would never back a war, read the Bible, love your enemies."
First, it's a hypothetical, made to illustrate a point. But I understand that Liberals are totally incapable of understanding hypotheticals or analogies. I just keep forgetting how stupid you all are.
And second, Jesus was born for two major purposes: Be the Saviour of all mankind, and be the leading warrior in the battle of Good vs Evil. Read your Bible, you subversive bastard.
What version are you reading? Yes, he is the savior of mankind, what is this about him fighting, maybe metaphorically. And what is with you and the personal attacks, calm down, not everyone agrees with you, just because they don't doesn't make them a "subversive bastard". What do you mean by it's hypothetical to illustratye a point, my comment is there to show how your illustration would never be true. You can't get out of this one with personal attacks.
"what is this about him fighting, maybe metaphorically"
--So in the Book of Revelation, what does Jesus do to the Antichist at Armageddon? Give him a big wet sloppy kiss? His battle against evil is one of the main reasons for the Second Coming.
"not everyone agrees with you"
--Look, if you're an Olbie zombie, then it's a forgone conclusion you're not interested in the truth & you're a Leftist. Leftists are subversives.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I know what hypothetical means, and don't be a smartass again and quote this and say good for you are something stupid like that. u r really pissing me off, what I mean is IF he did, he would never support the war, i cant believe u cant understand this.
no, he would have taken neither side, he would of seeked diplomacy to stop it
its not a fucking back up id, i have had monkfan forever, i created olermanntruth for just stuff on the show, sorry if its hard to comprehend, I try to simplify4u
"what I mean is IF he did, he would never support the war, i cant believe u cant understand this"
And once again, you are missing the point of the hypothetical. So why is it I don't believe you know what it means?
"he would of seeked diplomacy to stop it"
You mean like the diplomacy that failed to stop it? Would He continue to seek diplomatic solutions while Germany & Japan continued to slaughter people & take over the world? What about after they completed their goals? What then?
what do u mean im missing the point, u are, bottom line Jesus would never ever support violence
Yes, he would rather be diplomatic than violent any day and you're an idiot to say otherwise. Jesus beleived in liberal policy which included non violence.
Okay, it seems I'm going to have to spoon-feed this to you like a child. Are you ready?
Olbie is so hateful and short-sighted that even if our Lord and Savior backed the war on terror, Olbie would, incredibly and arrogantly and stupidly, put Christ on the "worst person" list.
So your pooint is that Olbermann is nearsighted, you used an hypothetical illustration of Jesus Christ to show that Keith is nearsighted. Okay then...if that's your way to get your point accross, (next time I wouldn't use someone who believes in loving your enemies for this point).
Yes, all the time, and especially this time, thank you very much.
"I wouldn't use someone who believes in loving your enemies for this point"
Again, that's part of the point, dummy. Damn!
"Yes, all the time, and especially this time"
Really? So Jesus never said "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" (Matthew 10:34)? And Jesus is not the Warrior for God in the battle of Good vs Evil in the Apocalypse? We must be talking about two different Messiahs.
haha you're so funny, thats a terrible way to get your point across.
on this we simply have different interperatations. My point is that he would never do that not in the sense that he would come back soon but in the sense that he would never back a war, now do you understand? I think this issue is finally settled.
the rest is too long for this comment so I will post it right now in a diiferent one.
Again (again, again, again), that's part of the point. Must I explain it again?
But you stil have the wrong impression. Jesus isn't against fighting evil. Fighting evil is NOT a sin, its our duty as believers in God and Jesus to fight evil. The "pacifist" idea makes a different point, it means that we shouldn't lash out in anger without thinking. and that we should forgive indescretions and bad behavior. Not that we should allow ourselves to be slaughtered.
"I don't think putting to rest of satan(who is behind war) and killing eachother (God's children killing God's children) are the same thing"
In the Apocolypse those who side with Jesus will rise from the battlefield, those who side with Satan shall remain and be wiped out by Jesus & His warriors. Satan will be cast back into Hell.
Satan isn't "behind war." Is he "behind" a war to defeat evil? No. He is evil. His purpose is to tempt and subvert God's most beloved creation; Man.
yes, Satan is behind war , WAR IS EVIL, I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU ARE TOO BLIND TO SEE THAT. Conservatives never have a perspective like that and frankly that scares me.
how is that a slogan? it is the truth, i think you're desperate to make me look stupid, that's like me just saying to one of your random comments "all your material is saying, you don't know the subject"
i said there was no such thing as war against evil, putting satan in hell is not war.
actually it shows how mindless and stupid conservatives are for not realizing that there is nothing wrong with killing other humans over lies because of bush's lack of intelligence.
Because its an overly simplistic answer that some gives when they don't understand what they're talking about. "Satan is behind all war because he's bad."
"i said there was no such thing as war against evil"
That's because you're a fool.
"putting satan in hell is not war"
Wow. Are you trying to be really stupid? Putting Satan back into Hell is a RESULT of the war, you dummy. Damn. Are you for real?
And your last "thought" there isn't a coherent sentence.
this is the rest of my comment from the other two parts, if it is confusing to read all in one just go to the video if you aren't there already to read, 500 too sml
I know you're going to say again that's not the point blah blah blah Jesus believes in violence and stuff like that. He does not once again he believed in loving your enemies, so he put satan back to hell, he did not shoot at him with guns, putting satan in hell and killing innocents in the middle east are different things you know.
Putting it that way is a total mischaracterization. Essentially a lie. Jesus understood violence probably more than anyone else.
"killing innocents in the middle east"
That is also a total mischaracterization. We are not simply "killing innocents" in the Middle East, we're fighting terrorists. Terrorists kill innocents to put of fear in the citizenry. We target terrorists. Sometimes there are unintended casualties. They are not targets.
I would appreciate it if you quote me in ful context for this one because it sounds like something I completely don't think. Jesus also understood peace more than anyone else, he understood and understands everything more than anyone else, to say someone knows more than Jesus in anything is ridiculous.
okay, so how many terrorists have we killed? how many civilians?
Olbermann Does anyone like this guy besides his mother. How does a guy go from ESPN to lecturing America on everything from Pres. Bush to his homosexuality I don't get it
Although Olbermann is dreadfully awful, I do realize that most people are followers and don't think for themselves and love regurgitate what he says. So in that aspect he can be extremely persuasive.
I beleive you have Olbermann confused with Oreally and that cigar chomping dick, whats his name... Oh ya, the guy more or less currently running the rebbie party, rush limbo.
(and yes, i did in fact deliberately mangle the names. looks better that way. :p )
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Racist like these Fox employees are the true keepers of hate and they think poor powerless white need this type reporting to stay energize,and you poor white people need to feel offended it's not true for all of you but I know some of you will swear that the Devils over at Fox are telling the truth.
I was going to say that again. I would like to add though can you keep him there? He seems to escape and stick his nose into Aussie politics every so often.
Keith Olbermann is the most hate filed and liberally-biased person in the media. He only attacks conservatives and only has liberals on his show. He is an example of how MSNBC has moved so far to the left. They are even farther left and biased than CNN.
And Bush has pretty much taken America to the edge of the Abyss. Next to nobody respects America anymore, and you're just a few years from utter bankruptcy. So instead of quoting a veiw that's obviously racist, why not call it for what it really is?
Bush and Mugabe are tyrants, war-mongers, and absolute retards. And they both see the world in "Black and White."
She didn't say the word "advocated". But there was more distortion than a Jimi Hendrix fuzz box about that whole item. Franken is/was a comedian, hello.
Their Co-Host Brian walked off the FOX set because they asked him if he would be offended if they called him a "Typical Sports Guy".
Talk about distortion. Olbmann is the king of distortion, lies, hate, and just being an idiot.
Oh yeah, a Sports Guy. I think that explains why Brian walked off the Fox set. He was a insulted to be called a "Sports Guy". Olbermann was a Sports Guy. That is insulting.
Brian Kilmeade walked off the set because his co-hosts had begun bashing him for defending Obama, the sports-guy comment was just the "Last Straw", lol
They had just agreed with him before the "Sports Guy" comment. It was like calling Olbermann "O "O'Reilly". Clearly it was not a heated debate but fairly calm before the comment.
"This s**t has gone too far, hate mongoring and race baiting for ratings"
At first I thought you were talking about Keith Olbermann -- then I see you attacked FNC. Weird, because it is Olbermann that constantly attacks FNC (especially Bill O'Reilly and Rupert Murdock), and he also expanded his attack of CNN from just Glenn Beck to Kirin Chetry this time. And all for ratings.
PMSNBC= The real lying news channel, which is why their ratings are so low.
puttputtking 2 months ago
Why can't people see all the lies that MSNBC presents? Coffeebaggers/Democrats/MSNBC and poop have a lot in common. They smell and no one cares about them or listen to them.
puttputtking 2 months ago
Even in a bad picture of Kiran she is still hot.
behold755 1 year ago
why don't people ever see all the lies the Fox News presents?
ChelseyCdubbs 1 year ago
They do, or else you wouldn't be saying that lol.
Noahthebeast09 1 year ago
hahahahaha the day their ratings dry up... its funny that you say that ramblebar because in this day and age keith is off air for corruption and fox news is the most watched news channel. hahahahaha
mrMarcheezy 1 year ago
Hey Ramblebar...How are Fox news ratings this week...? Just a little, tiny and a smidgen above MSNBC?
maine932 1 year ago
I could care less about what she said Kiran Chetry makes up for any mistakes with her good looks.
buioomega 1 year ago
@buioomega - Really? Doesn't that just answer ever so many questions about what's going on in the US?
Pax79pax 1 year ago
I thought Murdoch had written this, and I was reeling... until I realized that he just decided these weren't bad enough to delete from the forum.
IoEstasCedonta 1 year ago
obermann count diown to no rateings lol
pauldrake2511 1 year ago
anyone who works for fox, has very little chance to get another job in other major news organization.
comercio76 1 year ago
the only thing that's missing from this video is if keith went "hey HEY hey!" at the end and put two thumbs up, then pointed at the screen and said "Fox News!" with the biggest smile he could.... then flipped off the world.
DriftwiseS15 1 year ago
tea party republicans and fart have a lot in common big noise and a lot of smell
1961arnie 1 year ago
fixed news doesn't suck ass they lick it
1961arnie 1 year ago
This guy is so obessed with bashing FOX. He needs to concentrate on getting his rating up and stop alienating 90% of the country. His show SUCKS
broskie926 1 year ago
Keith Olbermann you are a shmuck in politics
MSavage59 2 years ago
@MSavage59 And you are a plain and ordinary shmuck. :)
makokun9 1 year ago
One thing I like about marijuana. The feel of leaving reality. It seems its always someone else who comes at me with racism. Rather if its, someone alerting me of a racist, someone coming to me with racist remarks, etc. I never actually think anyone is racist or doing racist things, untill someone purely shows me. See, I can get over the racial barrier. Now its time for everyone else to follow.
RastafariPoet 2 years ago
Keith O Is a boorish= boob. His show is boring, banal, and unenlightening at best. In two short words: He stinks!
IRISEILEENHARDIG 2 years ago
Fixed News!!
Yoni617 2 years ago 5
wow thats some serious racism, dont wanna hear if anything bad happens to him
NOVAGIRL666 2 years ago
Ohh racists.
Icerama108 2 years ago
Olby is hilarious. He is trying to be right?
RCTPatriot75 2 years ago
When I looked up "Keith Olbermann" on Youtube (relevance based), the first hit was "Keith Olbermann Neuters Bill O'Reilly" and the second was "Keith Olbermann Special Comment on Health Care Reform". The third was "Keith Olbermann - 8 years in 8 minutes".
This is followed by positive videos related to Olbermann's show.
For Bill O'Reilly?
#1:"Bill O'Reilly Flips Out"
#2:"Bill O'Reilly Gets Owned By Kid"
#3:"Camron on O'Reilly"
#4:"Bill O'Reilly SCARED by Richard Dawkins"
Pattern, much?
nafaidni 2 years ago
Keith Olberman is my worst person in the world; so roll a picture of yourself with a voice over please.
Batterystang 2 years ago
this guy is a fraud. he has a double standard for everything
whodat121980 2 years ago
this show is a joke. i'm sure murdoch endorses every stupid comment left on every story on a website that big
sedicenobufalo 2 years ago
I love people who are unbelieveably biased, and try to act like they are not. This guy is a dick.
rustydog0329 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
olbermann is a liberal douchebag
Fishmongerabc123 2 years ago
"You can take the announcer out of Fox News but you can't take the Fox News out of the announcer" LOLLLL
kingmarck1 2 years ago 20
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Keith Olbermann is a transparent tool. Couldn't cut it on ESPN as a sports announcer, yet holds himself out as a source of political and other commentary. Quite sad, really, that MSNBC couldn't find someone better to front their agenda.
toadfish16 2 years ago
Why do you Christians seek to forcibly impose your messiah on me and people like me? (IE, not interested in your blind faith)
As blunt as I can put it, in the words of a certain rock star; "Your Messiah was Never Mine."
(points for those that figure out who said that)
On topic however, I do find it quite amusing how quick connies are to try and paint people who expose thier little lies and games to be heathens, traitors, etc - when its the Connies doing the most damage. Go figure.
rkcoon 3 years ago
If Jesus Christ came back and backed the war on terror, he'd be "worst person in the world" that very night.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, it's a good thing the "Prince of Peace" wouldn't back the "War on Terror"
crazytvfan815 3 years ago
"Well, it's a good thing the "Prince of Peace" wouldn't back the "War on Terror" "
Once again, we see that Liberals are incapable of understanding a hypothetical or an analogy. Probably because it requires higher thinking abilities.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
Oooooo, someone's a super-genius. I know you like to feel smart because you have a thesaurus with you at all times, but it doesn't make you smart. Once again, a conservative ignores the main point and goes straight to a baseless personal attack. My point, if you could read deeper than the individual words, was that your premise is flawed. Those who are deserving of worst persons, get it.
crazytvfan815 3 years ago
"but it doesn't make you smart"
You believe there are words in that message that aren't used every day? Wow. BTW, understanding analogies does require intelligence. Not understaning them means you're dumb.
"baseless personal attack"
It wasn't baseless.
"your premise is flawed"
It wasn't a premise, it was a hypothetical designed to illustrate a point. A point which you're incapable of understanding, or didn't bother trying to because your Olbie-type hate got in the way.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
Jesus Christ would never back a war, read the Bible, love your enemies.
KeithOlbermannTruth 3 years ago
"Jesus Christ would never back a war, read the Bible, love your enemies."
First, it's a hypothetical, made to illustrate a point. But I understand that Liberals are totally incapable of understanding hypotheticals or analogies. I just keep forgetting how stupid you all are.
And second, Jesus was born for two major purposes: Be the Saviour of all mankind, and be the leading warrior in the battle of Good vs Evil. Read your Bible, you subversive bastard.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
What version are you reading? Yes, he is the savior of mankind, what is this about him fighting, maybe metaphorically. And what is with you and the personal attacks, calm down, not everyone agrees with you, just because they don't doesn't make them a "subversive bastard". What do you mean by it's hypothetical to illustratye a point, my comment is there to show how your illustration would never be true. You can't get out of this one with personal attacks.
KeithOlbermannTruth 3 years ago
"what is this about him fighting, maybe metaphorically"
--So in the Book of Revelation, what does Jesus do to the Antichist at Armageddon? Give him a big wet sloppy kiss? His battle against evil is one of the main reasons for the Second Coming.
"not everyone agrees with you"
--Look, if you're an Olbie zombie, then it's a forgone conclusion you're not interested in the truth & you're a Leftist. Leftists are subversives.
"your illustration would never be true"
--Thus, hypothetical, dummy.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Doesn't mean he supports viloence and today's war on terror
"olbie zombie", very creative, we are interested in the truth, that's why we avoid hannity and your type.
I know he can't come back today, I'm saying if he could he would never support the war, "dummy".
btw, this is KeithOlbermannTruth, I have two accounts.
monkfan14 3 years ago
"Doesn't mean he supports viloence and today's war on terror"
I didn't say he did or didn't, you idiot. You're still not getting it. Again, you & other Liberals are simply incapable of understanding.
"we are interested in the truth"
Whatever.
"I know he can't come back today, I'm saying if he could he would never support the war"
Ahh, so I see that you know, not believe, you know these two things. So you can speak for Jesus then?
"I have two accounts"
Naturally.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You said it was a possiblity, which it isn't, typical...I don't know what you are, no one would think Jesus would support war.
I'm not speaking for Jesus, I'm speaking OF the Bible, maybe you should read it sometime, it's a good read.
what do you mean "naturally", are you trying to be funny again? One is for Keith Olbermann stuff one is for monk and other stuff, you are an idiot.
monkfan14 3 years ago
"You said it was a possiblity, which it isn't"
I wrote it's a hypothetical. Please, just go look the word up instead of arguing with me.
"no one would think Jesus would support war"
Do you think Jesus would have supported the Allied Powers in WWII caving to Hitler or going on the offensive to defeat him?
"are you trying to be funny again"
No. Naturally you'd have an Olbie-worshipping ID and a backup ID to make it appear Olbie has more followers, therefore to intimidate others.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I know what hypothetical means, and don't be a smartass again and quote this and say good for you are something stupid like that. u r really pissing me off, what I mean is IF he did, he would never support the war, i cant believe u cant understand this.
no, he would have taken neither side, he would of seeked diplomacy to stop it
its not a fucking back up id, i have had monkfan forever, i created olermanntruth for just stuff on the show, sorry if its hard to comprehend, I try to simplify4u
monkfan14 3 years ago
"what I mean is IF he did, he would never support the war, i cant believe u cant understand this"
And once again, you are missing the point of the hypothetical. So why is it I don't believe you know what it means?
"he would of seeked diplomacy to stop it"
You mean like the diplomacy that failed to stop it? Would He continue to seek diplomatic solutions while Germany & Japan continued to slaughter people & take over the world? What about after they completed their goals? What then?
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
what do u mean im missing the point, u are, bottom line Jesus would never ever support violence
Yes, he would rather be diplomatic than violent any day and you're an idiot to say otherwise. Jesus beleived in liberal policy which included non violence.
monkfan14 3 years ago
"what do u mean im missing the point, u are"
Okay, it seems I'm going to have to spoon-feed this to you like a child. Are you ready?
Olbie is so hateful and short-sighted that even if our Lord and Savior backed the war on terror, Olbie would, incredibly and arrogantly and stupidly, put Christ on the "worst person" list.
Do you fucking get it now? Damn!
"which included non violence"
Not all the time.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
So your pooint is that Olbermann is nearsighted, you used an hypothetical illustration of Jesus Christ to show that Keith is nearsighted. Okay then...if that's your way to get your point accross, (next time I wouldn't use someone who believes in loving your enemies for this point).
Yes, all the time, and especially this time, thank you very much.
monkfan14 3 years ago
"if that's your way to get your point accross"
Well, for the quick-witted, yes.
"I wouldn't use someone who believes in loving your enemies for this point"
Again, that's part of the point, dummy. Damn!
"Yes, all the time, and especially this time"
Really? So Jesus never said "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" (Matthew 10:34)? And Jesus is not the Warrior for God in the battle of Good vs Evil in the Apocalypse? We must be talking about two different Messiahs.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago 2
haha you're so funny, thats a terrible way to get your point across.
on this we simply have different interperatations. My point is that he would never do that not in the sense that he would come back soon but in the sense that he would never back a war, now do you understand? I think this issue is finally settled.
the rest is too long for this comment so I will post it right now in a diiferent one.
monkfan14 3 years ago
"that he would never back a war"
Again (again, again, again), that's part of the point. Must I explain it again?
But you stil have the wrong impression. Jesus isn't against fighting evil. Fighting evil is NOT a sin, its our duty as believers in God and Jesus to fight evil. The "pacifist" idea makes a different point, it means that we shouldn't lash out in anger without thinking. and that we should forgive indescretions and bad behavior. Not that we should allow ourselves to be slaughtered.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
sorry, I didn't realize you replied, my inbox has flooded with 85 comments on my video, anyway...
once again, interperated in different ways, see other comment and maybe you will finally comprehend.
Osama Bin Laden and Satan are not the same thing.
KeithOlbermannTruth 3 years ago
"Osama Bin Laden and Satan are not the same thing"
I didn't say they were, but they are both evil.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
Did you read the full context? It has absolutely nothing to do with war and violence, nothing, it is a metaphor!
I don't think putting to rest of satan(who is behind war) and killing eachother (God's children killing God's children) are the same thing, do you.?
the rest is too long for one comment so I will post it in a different one now.
monkfan14 3 years ago
"I don't think putting to rest of satan(who is behind war) and killing eachother (God's children killing God's children) are the same thing"
In the Apocolypse those who side with Jesus will rise from the battlefield, those who side with Satan shall remain and be wiped out by Jesus & His warriors. Satan will be cast back into Hell.
Satan isn't "behind war." Is he "behind" a war to defeat evil? No. He is evil. His purpose is to tempt and subvert God's most beloved creation; Man.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
that argument does not weaken my point at all...
yes, Satan is behind war , WAR IS EVIL, I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU ARE TOO BLIND TO SEE THAT. Conservatives never have a perspective like that and frankly that scares me.
KeithOlbermannTruth 3 years ago
"that argument does not weaken my point at all"
It does. It shows that all you have are bumper sticker slogans without really knowing the subject.
"Satan is behind war , WAR IS EVIL, I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU ARE TOO BLIND TO SEE THAT"
War against evil is itself evil and backed by Satan? According to you, yes. How stupid
"Conservatives never have a perspective like that and frankly that scares me"
Just shows the only things you know about Conservatives comes from your Liberal handlers.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
how is that a slogan? it is the truth, i think you're desperate to make me look stupid, that's like me just saying to one of your random comments "all your material is saying, you don't know the subject"
i said there was no such thing as war against evil, putting satan in hell is not war.
actually it shows how mindless and stupid conservatives are for not realizing that there is nothing wrong with killing other humans over lies because of bush's lack of intelligence.
KeithOlbermannTruth 3 years ago
"how is that a slogan?"
Because its an overly simplistic answer that some gives when they don't understand what they're talking about. "Satan is behind all war because he's bad."
"i said there was no such thing as war against evil"
That's because you're a fool.
"putting satan in hell is not war"
Wow. Are you trying to be really stupid? Putting Satan back into Hell is a RESULT of the war, you dummy. Damn. Are you for real?
And your last "thought" there isn't a coherent sentence.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
this is the rest of my comment from the other two parts, if it is confusing to read all in one just go to the video if you aren't there already to read, 500 too sml
I know you're going to say again that's not the point blah blah blah Jesus believes in violence and stuff like that. He does not once again he believed in loving your enemies, so he put satan back to hell, he did not shoot at him with guns, putting satan in hell and killing innocents in the middle east are different things you know.
monkfan14 3 years ago
"Jesus believes in violence and stuff like that"
Putting it that way is a total mischaracterization. Essentially a lie. Jesus understood violence probably more than anyone else.
"killing innocents in the middle east"
That is also a total mischaracterization. We are not simply "killing innocents" in the Middle East, we're fighting terrorists. Terrorists kill innocents to put of fear in the citizenry. We target terrorists. Sometimes there are unintended casualties. They are not targets.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago 2
I would appreciate it if you quote me in ful context for this one because it sounds like something I completely don't think. Jesus also understood peace more than anyone else, he understood and understands everything more than anyone else, to say someone knows more than Jesus in anything is ridiculous.
okay, so how many terrorists have we killed? how many civilians?
KeithOlbermannTruth 3 years ago
"Jesus also understood peace more than anyone else"
I never said he didn't.
"to say someone knows more than Jesus in anything is ridiculous"
Please show me where I made that claim. I'll wait.
"so how many terrorists have we killed? how many civilians?"
Why don't you ask the Pentagon?
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
I know, I'm saying of course he knew more about violence than anyone because he knew everything more than anyone, why can't you see that?
see above point
?????
KeithOlbermannTruth 3 years ago
"why can't you see that?"
Why can't you just say that? You implied I said something I didn't. Why is it you just can't come out and say what you want to say? It's so stupid.
IntellectualAddict 3 years ago
Those that thump thier bibles, in my experience, havent actually READ the bloodstained thing.
rkcoon 3 years ago
Keith is still pissed he got fired from fox. Keith oblermann should just eat shit and die.
Does anyone actually believe that keith cares about anyone good interests?
cartmanfan0316 3 years ago
Olbermann Does anyone like this guy besides his mother. How does a guy go from ESPN to lecturing America on everything from Pres. Bush to his homosexuality I don't get it
Spurgeon123 3 years ago
Although Olbermann is dreadfully awful, I do realize that most people are followers and don't think for themselves and love regurgitate what he says. So in that aspect he can be extremely persuasive.
kingjosesmith 3 years ago
I beleive you have Olbermann confused with Oreally and that cigar chomping dick, whats his name... Oh ya, the guy more or less currently running the rebbie party, rush limbo.
(and yes, i did in fact deliberately mangle the names. looks better that way. :p )
rkcoon 3 years ago
Why is there scary organ music? Is this show for kids?
jayzastud 3 years ago
KO for president.
ghost4851 3 years ago
Steve "The Doo Doo Boy"Doocy and Gretchen"Bounce,Bounce"Carlson need Jesus.
mightyblack1 3 years ago
I love Keith , he is so hot
EdugeBDroN 3 years ago
Olberman should go back to his bathtub!
SkylineTime 3 years ago
Hey Olby, you're an asshole. Fat, shameless and stupid is no way to go through life son.
klrdotorg 3 years ago
Wow, what a surprise..........conservatives make Liberalman's worst people list.
ctcole77 3 years ago 2
wow u dont thin "u blacks would be eating naked and eating bugs" is racist.........
KeNYanBoii 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Racist like these Fox employees are the true keepers of hate and they think poor powerless white need this type reporting to stay energize,and you poor white people need to feel offended it's not true for all of you but I know some of you will swear that the Devils over at Fox are telling the truth.
mightyblack1 3 years ago
Rupert Murdock the Winner. On behalf of all fair minded Australians I would like to thank the USA for taking him out of my country.
millertas 3 years ago
I was going to say that again. I would like to add though can you keep him there? He seems to escape and stick his nose into Aussie politics every so often.
millertas 3 years ago
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool eating bugs without white people thats grade a humor
MrHunt35 3 years ago
Jews invented the Frankfurt School not Germans so your Anti-German angle here is seriously flawed.
JimmySmers 3 years ago
I love Kiran.
ttyyttyy9988 3 years ago
I "love" Kiran enough to want to see her in an alley gangbang.
JimmySmers 3 years ago
Don't be such a hypocrite! Neo-Cons love the game of political correctness. You sound like a fascist, yourself.
manyara02 3 years ago
DON'T BASH THE GORGEOUS KIRAN.
fatchicksneedloveT00 3 years ago 2
olberdick take dick in the........?
udiescummy 3 years ago
Go Olbermann...GREAT JOB!!!!!
manyara02 3 years ago
He looks like a german clarinet player. Oberman knocks Fox? Gimme a break, this guy makes Fidel Castro look like a right-winger.
HankMullaney 3 years ago
"therefor destroying these traditions and replacing them with multicultural marxism and collectivism." AKA racism.
golffreakss 3 years ago
Keith is Right on,he has Faux News on it's heels,and the day their ratings dry up,they will have nothing Go Keith!!!
Ramblebar 3 years ago 12
Keith Olbermann is the most hate filed and liberally-biased person in the media. He only attacks conservatives and only has liberals on his show. He is an example of how MSNBC has moved so far to the left. They are even farther left and biased than CNN.
Yankees106 4 years ago
He may be liberally biased, but I don't see him as "hate filled." What makes you think that?
ClumsyRoot 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anyway if you look at how Mugabe in Zimbabwe has ruineed his country. Then Murdoch is right!
Euroman25 4 years ago
And Bush has pretty much taken America to the edge of the Abyss. Next to nobody respects America anymore, and you're just a few years from utter bankruptcy. So instead of quoting a veiw that's obviously racist, why not call it for what it really is?
Bush and Mugabe are tyrants, war-mongers, and absolute retards. And they both see the world in "Black and White."
ScorpioDraconis 4 years ago 5
wonder what murdoch's pastor RICK WARREN would think of Rupert's actions
billiefan2000 4 years ago 4
She didn't say the word "advocated". But there was more distortion than a Jimi Hendrix fuzz box about that whole item. Franken is/was a comedian, hello.
livegems 4 years ago
YUP he does...but he's exposing Murdock for the hateful bigot he is.
brghtsd1 4 years ago
Their Co-Host Brian walked off the FOX set because they asked him if he would be offended if they called him a "Typical Sports Guy".
Talk about distortion. Olbmann is the king of distortion, lies, hate, and just being an idiot.
Oh yeah, a Sports Guy. I think that explains why Brian walked off the Fox set. He was a insulted to be called a "Sports Guy". Olbermann was a Sports Guy. That is insulting.
ClassicFIHD 4 years ago
Brian Kilmeade walked off the set because his co-hosts had begun bashing him for defending Obama, the sports-guy comment was just the "Last Straw", lol
taurusgames 4 years ago 2
They had just agreed with him before the "Sports Guy" comment. It was like calling Olbermann "O "O'Reilly". Clearly it was not a heated debate but fairly calm before the comment.
ClassicFIHD 4 years ago
FoxNews sucks ass.
highdimension11 4 years ago 7
This s**t has gone too far; hate mongoring and race baiting for ratings...Fox is not news
brghtsd1 4 years ago 3
"This s**t has gone too far, hate mongoring and race baiting for ratings"
At first I thought you were talking about Keith Olbermann -- then I see you attacked FNC. Weird, because it is Olbermann that constantly attacks FNC (especially Bill O'Reilly and Rupert Murdock), and he also expanded his attack of CNN from just Glenn Beck to Kirin Chetry this time. And all for ratings.
InvestigatorDave 4 years ago