and abt Nadal beating him on every surface, till 2007 when they had faster courts, Nadal never made it far enough to beat fed except in roland gaross. He lost both wimbledon finals but he played really well giving fed a run for his money. only after 2008 where they killed speed and serve and volley did Nadal beat Federer. Federer always makes it to the stage where these two play. Same cannot be said of Nadal when the courts were diff
Just in case u ppl dont know, till 2007 Australian open was played on rebound Ace surface which was much faster and had less bounce which suits Fed's style of play. They also slow downed wimbledon the same year which coincidentally Nadal won, but not before fed took him to 5 sets. Nadal had to wait till 2010 when they slowed down US open too till he won that slam. by this time, Fed was past his prime.
lol this isnt federer playing at his best. if novak djokoiv and nadal went bak in time to when federer was there age.( they will al be lik 24-25) Federer would easily rape them
I think Federer made the game better. He's the main reason Nadal and Djokovic are so good today. Nadal and Djokovic had to keep improving to really challenge Federer at every GS.
i have the feeling federer was in very bad shape at that tournament. im not sure if he already suffered mononucleosis then but it seems so. in every match at AO 2008 he was sweating very much which he actually never does. something seems to be wrong with him.
in 2006 which is federer's best years: federer won three grandslams and 4 atp master series, and in that year federer only beated weak players like baghdatis, roddick, include nadal but on grass.
in 2011 which is djokovic's best years: djokovic won three grandslams and 5 atp master series(more than federer) and in that year he has beaten great players like federer, nadal(on clay), murray etc.
and this year djokovic already won 10 titles, but federer won 0 lol, So djokovic is GOAT not Fed.
@chhunvorn how does one year constitute GOAT. nadal won 3 slams last year...so by your logic nadal would've been. you're an idiot and your don't make sense.
@cj397 yeah in 2010 nadal won 3 slams, but he only won 3 atp master series, and in 2006 which federer's best year, fed won 3 slams too, but he can only won 4 atp master series. In 2011 which is djokovic's best year, djoko won 3 slams and he won 5 atp master series even more than federer and nadal, so djokovic is the GOAT, Fed and Nadal are just one of greatest.
@chhunvorn one year result can't be compared to fed's dominance. borderline retarded statements on your part. even nadal is above djokovic at the moment.
@cj397 Federer is a great champion, arguably the most but will never be a great man because it is arrogant and a bad loser. Click here to read are true examples of the Sport of conduct and to me the true champions and great people.
@chhunvorn Federer won doha dickhead, he also won 3 grand slams each year between 2005-2007 so YOU SHOULDN´T comment about the regularity or greatness of the GOAT ROGER FEDERER OF NAZARETH
Roger cant be considered the greatest of all time cos he has a negative head-to-head record with his greatest rival (rafa) and he has a modest 5set record (18-16) infact he has chocked many times on a big stage in a 5 set match (safin 05, nalbandian 05, nadal 08, del potro 09, djokovic 10 & 11, tsonga 11). Fed has dominated tennis from 2004 and 2007 like no one has ever done but overall because of those two facts he can only be considered the most successful players of all time, im fed's fan btw
@petitprince1 he started losing to nadal (other than clay) only when he was 27 .. and had he been 24 , i guess he would have won those matches too as most of the 5 setters he lost to Nadal were because of exhaustion towards the end.. And what do you have to say about Nadal... he just got whooped on all surfaces by Djokovic .. and the matches were not even close(except Miami) .. Even i can say that Nadal shouldn't even be called great !
Both Federer and Nadal are legends.. and Fed is the GOAT!
@TheFedererNadallover Hey man, stop shittin.......federer started losing to nadal only when he was 27???...Check the history books when federer was 25 Nadal led 6-3 against him....And Federer has beaten Nadal only on Grass in GS whereas Nadal has beaten him on every surface...And u say the matches were close need i remind u of 2008 Roland Garros??? Well my friend, the truth is fed conquered everything, but Nadal conquered Fed himself...
@tapobonn ok .. at the end of 07 .. Federer was 6-8 vs Nadal.... ever since .. Nadal has dominated Federer because age was catching up for Roger! And what do u say about Nadal.. at 24-25 he gets owned by completely owned by his rival ? And Federer was nearing 27 when he played the RG final .. all other matches were close.. So i guess ur the one shittin around!!
@TheFedererNadallover Federer's form deterioration had very little to do with age....Had guys like Roddick, Hewitt or Safin been his biggest competitors he would have easily had years like 2006.....But with guys like Nadal, Djokovic and Murray around, he really felt the pulse and that's why he lost....If age was really that much a factor he would have been out of top 10 by now, but he's not even out of top 5.......
@tapobonn You mean to say that Federer is playing at the same level as he was in 05-06 ? And hey .. back in the day .. Roddick and Safin were really good ... !
@TheFedererNadallover Who said Federer playing at the same level as 2005-2006???......What i meant was Federer was never challenged his entire life....The moment he started getting challenged he started panicking and started losing.......and if Roddick and Safin were really good, so is Del Potro.........
@tapobonn That way even i can say Nadal had no challenge in 2010 .. he beat Soderling , Berdych and a tired Djokovic in the respective GS finals ? And why do u say Del potro isn't good.. back in 09 .. he was deadly..!! And so were Roddick and Safin in 03-05
@TheFedererNadallover no challenge in 2010? Soderling was enough of a challenge to beat the one they call the greatest of all time...Berdych was enough of a challenge to beat the one they call the greatest of all time...and Djokovic beat Federer...oh yeah isn't he the one they call the greatest of all time? lol dumbass
@imavaughanstar Ha ha .. Federer was not at his best in 2010 .. he was 29 ! And Soderling and Berdych have never really troubled Nadal, Djokovic and Federer in the big matches(with a couple of exceptions) Federer was (in 2010) and is far from his best .. so beating Federer was not THAT big a deal in 2010 as it would have been from 04-08! And neither Soderling nor Berdych are/ were a part of the big 3 !
@TheFedererNadallover I never said he was in his prime dickhead. Federer was the only other slam winner that year besides rafa, suggesting that even though he wasn't at his best ever he was still playing some fantastic tennis, he himself described 2010 Aus Open as one of his best slams performance-wise. As for Soderling/Berdych not being in the top 3, both beat a member of the top 3 (berdych also destroyed novak at wimby) which is to say they were playing well enough to overcome the worlds best
@imavaughanstar of course he was playing his best you bitch ! That's why he lost to Baghdatis , Berdych in Indian Wells and Miami :D And Nadal was playing poor tennis at the start of 2010 and he still beat Berdych in straight sets in Miami ! And even better Federer lost to Wawrinka in Monte Carlo and Gulbis in Rome (if i'm not mistaken) So obviously Federer was playing his BEST ! Dumbfuck ! And Novak .. lol .. if he could lose to Melzer @RG then why not Berdych at Wimbledon ? clitface ! LOL!
@TheFedererNadallover u just said earlier that because Soderling/Berdych aren't a part of the big three that they obviously aren't challenging players, yet now you're saying Novak who was the world no. 3 at the time of that match was shit and that anyone could have forseen him being trampled by Berdych? lol ur one dumb cunt. besides Federer takes slams more seriously than masters, he has said that himself numerous times when asked why he has beaten murray in slams but loses to him in masters
@imavaughanstar Maybe not Berdych crushing Djokovic like the way he did , but Djokovic was not the Big Favourite in that match .. ! So it wasn't a monster upset or anything of that sort ! And Federer beat Murray in both slam finals where Murray imo , choked ! cunthole :P
@TheFedererNadallover you're the only one choking mate, on your own words lol look at it this way, Soderling and Berdych beat Djokovic and Federer during the Roland Garros-Wimby season, as well as went to five sets against each other in the SF of Roland Garros. Both ended up reaching a grand slam final during that time frame - they were both playing great tennis, better than anyone else was playing except Rafa. Rafa was up against two great opponents, and he just found a way to beat them
@911801111801 Berdych last beat Nadal in Madrid 06 ! Nadal was not a complete player back then as he is now. Its like saying Hewitt troubles Federer just because he won their 7 of their first 9 matches ? Lol!
And Soderling , yeah , he did beat Nadal at the RG 09 and WTF 09, but that was that ! He has destroyed Soderling ever since !
So your the one who needs to do you so called 'Research' !
Nadal was indeed a superstar in 2005, and not only on clay... he won a career-best 3 titles on normal courts, and ended the year as World No. 2... it's undeniable that he was a superstar...
@TheFedererNadallover Federer is the second most talented player behind Federer in the post Agassi/Sampras era. Quite a few experts think Safin is actually MORE talented than Federer, but he had problems with motivation and injuries. Everytime he started playing well, he would get injured. I really think that could have been the best rivalry of all time, the Safin Federer rivarly.
@davd1986 when federer plays on 100 procent, like he was 2006 with perfect backhand and super-perfect forehand, there is no player who can play with him..even djokovic and nadal
@tapobonn Del Potro? Wait I heard that name somewhere...Where was it...??? Oh yes I know! US Open 2009,semi final: Del Potro-Nadal 6-2,6-2,6-2! (just an example how powerless Nadal is when someone is having a great day).
@tapobonn I may get ridiculed for sayin this, but Safn at his very best could out play the likes of Nadal, who was (Not saying is because of their recent 6-3, 6-0 showdown) Federer's great nemesis. Federer dealt with Safin repeatedly, and in 2006 Federer finished the season 92 wins to 5 losses, and that year also sparked the Fed-Nadal rivalry. Federer, at his very best, can out-play and out-maneuver any player on this friggin' planet.
federer was in his prime at the time, thats the point. so he wasnt unbeatable, he just didnt have worthy opponents. had safin been tougher mentally and cared more about matches, he could have easily challenged him. then nadal showed up and beat prime federer easily. young djokovic also beat him in his prime. then came del potro, muray tsonga. if all of them were in their primes during that time, federer wouldnt have half of his slams
If this time djoko would have known that he is allergic to gluten.. then after federer djokovic would be the one who would have dominated.. nadal probably would have never become world number 1
I cant believe this guy has got 34 thumbs up for insulting this poor fellow who's just trying to cheer his little heart out. What is wrong with you people?
30 people still using the lame mono excuses why djoko won. Get over it, cuz fed was ok until he met djoko. It happen again this yr and same result in str8 set at AO 11. Back then djoko was on a role, until his confidence went south. Now it's back and he is more focus. This coming from a nadal's fan. That's how much respect towards djoko.
@statistic90 how is he now playing his best when he is in every master final this season. Winning 2 tournaments in which Djokovic didn't play and getting injured at AO, or he would even there be in the final(probably). Please, I am sick of this BS that player A isn't playing his best, yet he is in every final. Djokovic is outplaying him atm, that simple. Or am I going to say that in past Djokovic wasn't playing his best so that is why he didn't win more GS. it's stupid, fanboy excuse.
@Globox822 am not a fanboy of anyone or anyteam.... its funny how do u call me that and show how fanboy of djoko u are, well, nadal its playing good, hes the number 1 you know, its for some reason, but if u have seen him at his best on clay, its obvius hes not playing at his very best, if u dont see that, dont miss time to reply me xD
@Globox822 trust me djokovic is scared of federer but not nadal. He only shows respect to federer. But he rally gung ho against nadal cus nadal always played same way. Federer is unpredictable and difficult to handle for him. Nadal is better matchup to him but i think he is declining in muscles and novak improved on his BH to counter top spin.
@youziness I disagree. I don't think it's about matchup. Its more about nadal game has dip, while djoko is on the rise. It's a temporary thing. I don't expect him to continue for ever. Nadal level been down since he won the USO 10. The only thing nadal is about is GS and YEC. Maybe adding few more master titles he haven't won yet to his collection.
@Thutmosis7 i dont expect nadal to continue forever too. He start his prime in 2005 or 06. Its reasonable to see it end in 2011, tennis players have 5 yrs at most playing at their best. Only blind fanboys think his prime started in 2010. Its about who is better when they are at their worst. When he can't outrun everyone anymore, his real level of tennis skill will be exposed.
@youziness Prime years 05 or 06? I disagree i don't think nadal was in his prime yet. It's like saying pete was in his prime when he won 90 USO. Nah he wasn't yet until mid 93 that was when his prime started. Nadal prime started in 08. He had a set back in 09 with the injuries and return back to the form in 10. I would say he still got couple more yrs left in him to rack up more titles. Fed prime yr started in 04 and lasted 08. Djoko is in his prime now.
@Thutmosis7 I agree with you, IIRC Federer's 2004 was when he only lost 4 matches but ended in END of 2008, Im a Fed fan and I won't take away the credit from nadal when he beat fed in wimby.
@calugcug21 I hear you bro. Looking forward to tomorrow matchup. Could be another Fedal final. I like nadal over delpo in 4, and i think fed will win in 4. The other matches with djoko, murray, tsonga, and berdych can go either way.
@calugcug21 Ok i see. I am nadal fan and before him came on the scene. I was a sampras fan. So i am going to have some bias feelings towards fed. I don't want him to get number 1 or win again. I would like pete to still own the record at number 1 and also 7 W titles. Fed already have enough records for himself which he can keep. He is already well accomplish. I would rather murray win one than see fed win any again. I am not so for djoko. He is getting a bit arrogant to me.
@calugcug21 I still like fed, just don't want him to have everything. He is already accomplish his feat. I mean if he gets there, well fine. But not going to support it cuz i want nadal to continue for another few yrs at that spot. I am not feeling djoko. Eventhough he is a charismatic type. Eventhough i would want nadal to get a crack at him cuz i know nadal can beat him. I just feel like it might be another fedal final to be honest.
@Thutmosis7 all I want is Fed winning wimby becoming number 1 and stays for 2 weeks and retires or Fedal final 5 sets and fed gets his revenge and retires, window's closing for fed and i want him to retire winning
@calugcug21 retired? U forgot that fed said he want to play till he is 35 and also win Gold medal in 2012. He also set his site on 20 GS. Maybe you never saw his interview. Eventhough it seem unlikely he will set that goal. Cuz too much guys are hungry for the title thing. Chance are dindling for him. It will be hard especially with novak and delpo on the rise. Not to mention other big stars. I am hearing about this new guy that play like fed? Some Dimitrov i think his name
@Thutmosis7 I knew that interview, all Im saying is he is not the same and even though he still can beat anybody on the tour at any surface playing at his best those goals are difficult to reach. I'm just saying I want Fed to retire when he's still on top of the tennis world. grigor dimitrov?
@calugcug21 Damn i am in stocker believe mood right now. How did fed blew the match like that? He just gave up after set 4 completely. I know tsonga is good, but i thought fed just didn't executed good in the late couple of set. I would of said fed would win in 4. But lose in 5 when leading after 2 set? Nah it's crazy what happen. I give tsonga a chance to upset djoko tomorrow in 5. I also like nadal to beat murray in 4.
@Thutmosis7 yeah so sad you know. Something quite ironic is before the match I said to myself that Tsonga has no chance of winning this unless he plays out of his mind. I give credit to him although it's clear that federer relaxed and when it came to the 5th set, he was shocked and unable to deliver. I am hoping for a nadal-tsonga final now
@Thutmosis7 u never know what federer was thinking. Maybe he knows djokovic can beat nadal easier with his 2 handed backhand and peak game. So there he gave djokovic easy game against tsonga to rest. The winner is both djokovic and federer. If he closed out tsonga he may go thru thinking he only had energy to deal with 1 of them. Whoever is no.1 is irrelevant already. I am not surprised if fed close out his QF match to enter SF of USO meeting nadal later on. Deal with djoko is another day.
Nole is so much buffer these days LOL comparing this match to his matches on hard court this year and he looks like a totally different player. Better serve, better ground strokes (esp that backhand!), better volleying, and much much better fitness. He can keep pace with the likes of Rafa in those 20+ shot rallies and he just reads the game better now than he ever has. What a phenomenal start. Nole OWNS.
man i can not understand autor of this video...i mean djokovic won and he puts allmost only federers points...come on he can not had win only by runing around...i hate when people do that...
I've already commented on here once, but I gotta admit this was a sweet sweet match from both players. On a slightly different note, federerbestclass, you are becoming the embodiment of aids on youtube; commenting on every single of Fed's recently tagged videos with sentences which don't even make sense; example, ''Federer, best! great job, player MONO ever..amazing!''. Yeah we get it buddy you have a raging hard-on for Fed, but please pack it in and unsubscribe. Oh ye btw guys... 7:55 wtf?!
it is shame that solid players like nadal(2006), djokovic(2008), murray(2008)
, del potro(2009) come up a bit late, if those fours could have played their best tennis since 2004, i think right now Roger he could only won 5 or 6 grand slams.
it is shame that solid players like nadal(2006), djokovic(2008), murray(2008)
, del potro(2009) come up a bit late, if those fours could have played their best tennis since 2004, i think right now Roger he could only won 5 or 6 grand slams.
it is shame that solid players like nadal(2006), djokovic(2008), murray(2008)
, del potro(2009) come up a bit late, if those fours could have played their best tennis since 2004, i think right now Roger he could only won 5 or 6 grand slams.
Please stop calling this fake bastard federer is GOAT, because he does not deserve it. He needed five set to beat 34 old agassi, he was very lucky, because his serve save him so many time, and agassi's serve was rubbish. If agassi could serve like Kalovic sampras djokovic and roddick, he would actually destroy federer easily may be in three straight set. Moreover federer just beat weak players like roddick, hewitt etc. to win his grandslams.
@vampireknightrock100 Dude he only beat nadal 2 times in grandslam(wimbledon 2006, 2007), but nadal beat him 6 times in grandslam(French open 2005,2006,2007,2008, Wimbledon 2008, Australia open 2009), and he still has negative record against nadal who has poor serve(even poorer then agassi). When he lost to djokovic in Australia open 2008, 2011 in straight sets, federer fans said he was sick and old. But when he beat 34 years old agassi in us open 2004 QF and 2005 Final, they just keep silence.
@chhunvorn Speaking badly about Federer can only mean that for the past 10 years you have been probably watching curling or syncronised swimming. Federer is the best tennis player that there has ever been. Once Nadal, Djokovic or any other player will have won more grand slam titles than him, then, and only at that point you will be able to say the contrary.
@0507590 nice top comment faggot attention seeking for likes ?
MrWalto69 2 days ago
very good match, novak played very well.
extradutyfelt1 6 days ago
7:23 se hace el bueno el bebe del reves a 2 manitos
NovakFederer 2 weeks ago
and abt Nadal beating him on every surface, till 2007 when they had faster courts, Nadal never made it far enough to beat fed except in roland gaross. He lost both wimbledon finals but he played really well giving fed a run for his money. only after 2008 where they killed speed and serve and volley did Nadal beat Federer. Federer always makes it to the stage where these two play. Same cannot be said of Nadal when the courts were diff
jerilee86 4 weeks ago
Just in case u ppl dont know, till 2007 Australian open was played on rebound Ace surface which was much faster and had less bounce which suits Fed's style of play. They also slow downed wimbledon the same year which coincidentally Nadal won, but not before fed took him to 5 sets. Nadal had to wait till 2010 when they slowed down US open too till he won that slam. by this time, Fed was past his prime.
jerilee86 4 weeks ago
lol this isnt federer playing at his best. if novak djokoiv and nadal went bak in time to when federer was there age.( they will al be lik 24-25) Federer would easily rape them
justtuan96 1 month ago
@justtuan96 hey you can say that! and if Federer went back in time Pete Sampras would rape him!
hordenbadboy 4 weeks ago
backhand at 5:00 is ridiculous!
lagerandapacketcrisp 1 month ago
this federer is way better than the federer that lost two days ago against nadal (hitting depper in the line)
Luchon20092109 1 month ago
I think Federer made the game better. He's the main reason Nadal and Djokovic are so good today. Nadal and Djokovic had to keep improving to really challenge Federer at every GS.
Steve0904 1 month ago
@Steve0904
I agree with you, Federer make Djokovic and Nadal.
87Logitech 1 month ago
i have the feeling federer was in very bad shape at that tournament. im not sure if he already suffered mononucleosis then but it seems so. in every match at AO 2008 he was sweating very much which he actually never does. something seems to be wrong with him.
bremonius 1 month ago
did he really mean any tournament or did he mean to say Grand Slam??
ThePacemaker45 1 month ago
I'm trying to get some stuff from these two. Watch me playing on my channel and tell me what you think you will make my day thanks :)
kostenis 2 months ago
7:10 crazy guy
NicoF96 3 months ago
HD, my ass.
TXAZ84 3 months ago
yes its in hd :D
rononagy 3 months ago
djokovic is so arrogant and cocky
big4long 3 months ago
when ever fed loses he has some issue, therefore fed must be having PMS. Since that is "problem" that female tennis players have. Fed the pms
Globox822 4 months ago
Damn,fed moved really slow here,almost like a snail,just watched a couple 07,06 matches,fed was way faster,faster to his forehand side especially.
Those freaking sampras exhibition matches must have caused the freaking mono.
Fk u sampras and your exhos.
KaminariKatta 4 months ago
a retard at 7:11
petitprince1 5 months ago
He's from Serbia !! He'll fukin murder ya !! Haha. Novak Zakonnnnnnn ; )
AMGRULEZ 5 months ago
the court looks so small
ShockHeed 5 months ago
I just can't stand Djokovic's family .. FUCK ALL OF THEM
cascantediego 5 months ago
@cascantediego You're just a little jealously bastard. Djokovic rules 4ever
insrbgistro 5 months ago
@insrbgistro No Im not. they're all serbian dickheads specially his Dad and brothers
cascantediego 5 months ago
@cascantediego yeah fuck them just like i fucked your gipsy family
Muskelegger1990 5 months ago
Nice !!! Serbia baby !!!!!
AMGRULEZ 5 months ago
in 2006 which is federer's best years: federer won three grandslams and 4 atp master series, and in that year federer only beated weak players like baghdatis, roddick, include nadal but on grass.
in 2011 which is djokovic's best years: djokovic won three grandslams and 5 atp master series(more than federer) and in that year he has beaten great players like federer, nadal(on clay), murray etc.
and this year djokovic already won 10 titles, but federer won 0 lol, So djokovic is GOAT not Fed.
chhunvorn 5 months ago
@chhunvorn how does one year constitute GOAT. nadal won 3 slams last year...so by your logic nadal would've been. you're an idiot and your don't make sense.
cj397 5 months ago in playlist cj397's Favorited Videos
@cj397 yeah in 2010 nadal won 3 slams, but he only won 3 atp master series, and in 2006 which federer's best year, fed won 3 slams too, but he can only won 4 atp master series. In 2011 which is djokovic's best year, djoko won 3 slams and he won 5 atp master series even more than federer and nadal, so djokovic is the GOAT, Fed and Nadal are just one of greatest.
chhunvorn 5 months ago
@chhunvorn one year result can't be compared to fed's dominance. borderline retarded statements on your part. even nadal is above djokovic at the moment.
cj397 5 months ago
@cj397 Federer is a great champion, arguably the most but will never be a great man because it is arrogant and a bad loser. Click here to read are true examples of the Sport of conduct and to me the true champions and great people.
insrbgistro 5 months ago
@chhunvorn Fed is won one titel in Doha. xDD
insrbgistro 5 months ago
@chhunvorn Federer won doha dickhead, he also won 3 grand slams each year between 2005-2007 so YOU SHOULDN´T comment about the regularity or greatness of the GOAT ROGER FEDERER OF NAZARETH
cascantediego 5 months ago
@cascantediego fed shud retire....he is horse shit now
sagrocket 5 months ago
@sagrocket no, you are
cascantediego 5 months ago
Comment removed
chhunvorn 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Roger cant be considered the greatest of all time cos he has a negative head-to-head record with his greatest rival (rafa) and he has a modest 5set record (18-16) infact he has chocked many times on a big stage in a 5 set match (safin 05, nalbandian 05, nadal 08, del potro 09, djokovic 10 & 11, tsonga 11). Fed has dominated tennis from 2004 and 2007 like no one has ever done but overall because of those two facts he can only be considered the most successful players of all time, im fed's fan btw
petitprince1 5 months ago
@petitprince1 he started losing to nadal (other than clay) only when he was 27 .. and had he been 24 , i guess he would have won those matches too as most of the 5 setters he lost to Nadal were because of exhaustion towards the end.. And what do you have to say about Nadal... he just got whooped on all surfaces by Djokovic .. and the matches were not even close(except Miami) .. Even i can say that Nadal shouldn't even be called great !
Both Federer and Nadal are legends.. and Fed is the GOAT!
TheFedererNadallover 5 months ago
@TheFedererNadallover Federer the PMS
Globox822 4 months ago
@Globox822 How many slams have YOU won?
manco82 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@manco82 more then you. How many slams have YOU won?
Globox822 4 months ago
@TheFedererNadallover Hey man, stop shittin.......federer started losing to nadal only when he was 27???...Check the history books when federer was 25 Nadal led 6-3 against him....And Federer has beaten Nadal only on Grass in GS whereas Nadal has beaten him on every surface...And u say the matches were close need i remind u of 2008 Roland Garros??? Well my friend, the truth is fed conquered everything, but Nadal conquered Fed himself...
tapobonn 4 months ago
@tapobonn ok .. at the end of 07 .. Federer was 6-8 vs Nadal.... ever since .. Nadal has dominated Federer because age was catching up for Roger! And what do u say about Nadal.. at 24-25 he gets owned by completely owned by his rival ? And Federer was nearing 27 when he played the RG final .. all other matches were close.. So i guess ur the one shittin around!!
TheFedererNadallover 4 months ago
Comment removed
tapobonn 4 months ago
@TheFedererNadallover Federer's form deterioration had very little to do with age....Had guys like Roddick, Hewitt or Safin been his biggest competitors he would have easily had years like 2006.....But with guys like Nadal, Djokovic and Murray around, he really felt the pulse and that's why he lost....If age was really that much a factor he would have been out of top 10 by now, but he's not even out of top 5.......
tapobonn 4 months ago
@tapobonn You mean to say that Federer is playing at the same level as he was in 05-06 ? And hey .. back in the day .. Roddick and Safin were really good ... !
TheFedererNadallover 4 months ago
@TheFedererNadallover Who said Federer playing at the same level as 2005-2006???......What i meant was Federer was never challenged his entire life....The moment he started getting challenged he started panicking and started losing.......and if Roddick and Safin were really good, so is Del Potro.........
tapobonn 4 months ago
@tapobonn That way even i can say Nadal had no challenge in 2010 .. he beat Soderling , Berdych and a tired Djokovic in the respective GS finals ? And why do u say Del potro isn't good.. back in 09 .. he was deadly..!! And so were Roddick and Safin in 03-05
TheFedererNadallover 4 months ago 10
@TheFedererNadallover no challenge in 2010? Soderling was enough of a challenge to beat the one they call the greatest of all time...Berdych was enough of a challenge to beat the one they call the greatest of all time...and Djokovic beat Federer...oh yeah isn't he the one they call the greatest of all time? lol dumbass
imavaughanstar 3 weeks ago
@imavaughanstar Ha ha .. Federer was not at his best in 2010 .. he was 29 ! And Soderling and Berdych have never really troubled Nadal, Djokovic and Federer in the big matches(with a couple of exceptions) Federer was (in 2010) and is far from his best .. so beating Federer was not THAT big a deal in 2010 as it would have been from 04-08! And neither Soderling nor Berdych are/ were a part of the big 3 !
So yeah .. your the fucking Dumbass ! LOL!
TheFedererNadallover 3 weeks ago
@TheFedererNadallover I never said he was in his prime dickhead. Federer was the only other slam winner that year besides rafa, suggesting that even though he wasn't at his best ever he was still playing some fantastic tennis, he himself described 2010 Aus Open as one of his best slams performance-wise. As for Soderling/Berdych not being in the top 3, both beat a member of the top 3 (berdych also destroyed novak at wimby) which is to say they were playing well enough to overcome the worlds best
imavaughanstar 3 weeks ago
@imavaughanstar of course he was playing his best you bitch ! That's why he lost to Baghdatis , Berdych in Indian Wells and Miami :D And Nadal was playing poor tennis at the start of 2010 and he still beat Berdych in straight sets in Miami ! And even better Federer lost to Wawrinka in Monte Carlo and Gulbis in Rome (if i'm not mistaken) So obviously Federer was playing his BEST ! Dumbfuck ! And Novak .. lol .. if he could lose to Melzer @RG then why not Berdych at Wimbledon ? clitface ! LOL!
TheFedererNadallover 3 weeks ago
@TheFedererNadallover u just said earlier that because Soderling/Berdych aren't a part of the big three that they obviously aren't challenging players, yet now you're saying Novak who was the world no. 3 at the time of that match was shit and that anyone could have forseen him being trampled by Berdych? lol ur one dumb cunt. besides Federer takes slams more seriously than masters, he has said that himself numerous times when asked why he has beaten murray in slams but loses to him in masters
imavaughanstar 3 weeks ago
@imavaughanstar Maybe not Berdych crushing Djokovic like the way he did , but Djokovic was not the Big Favourite in that match .. ! So it wasn't a monster upset or anything of that sort ! And Federer beat Murray in both slam finals where Murray imo , choked ! cunthole :P
TheFedererNadallover 3 weeks ago
@TheFedererNadallover you're the only one choking mate, on your own words lol look at it this way, Soderling and Berdych beat Djokovic and Federer during the Roland Garros-Wimby season, as well as went to five sets against each other in the SF of Roland Garros. Both ended up reaching a grand slam final during that time frame - they were both playing great tennis, better than anyone else was playing except Rafa. Rafa was up against two great opponents, and he just found a way to beat them
imavaughanstar 3 weeks ago
''Soderling and Berdych have never really troubled Nadal''
Soderling has a couple of wins against Nadal, including being the only one, so far, to have beaten Nadal at Roland Garros...
And Berdych won 3 of the first 4 encounters against Nadal, before going onto lose 10 straight matches to him...
Do your research, if you're going to talk with base!!!!
911801111801 2 weeks ago
@911801111801 Berdych last beat Nadal in Madrid 06 ! Nadal was not a complete player back then as he is now. Its like saying Hewitt troubles Federer just because he won their 7 of their first 9 matches ? Lol!
And Soderling , yeah , he did beat Nadal at the RG 09 and WTF 09, but that was that ! He has destroyed Soderling ever since !
So your the one who needs to do you so called 'Research' !
TheFedererNadallover 2 weeks ago
Don't twist words to make you sound well...
you said: ''Soderling and Berdych have NEVER REALLY troubled Nadal''
Nadal was a superstar by 2005...
''It's like saying Hewitt troubles Federer just because he won 7 of their first 9 matches''
He doesn't trouble Federer TODAY... but back then he did... you couldn't have said it better... do you know the meaning of the word NEVER?
I realized that you don't need to research facts... you need to study the english language...
911801111801 2 weeks ago
@911801111801 NEVER REALLY is NOT NEVER !
It means NOT MUCH !!
So you get your English right !
And in 05, Nadal was a superstar on CLAY !
So you need to get your research right as well !! :D
TheFedererNadallover 2 weeks ago
Nadal was indeed a superstar in 2005, and not only on clay... he won a career-best 3 titles on normal courts, and ended the year as World No. 2... it's undeniable that he was a superstar...
911801111801 2 weeks ago
@TheFedererNadallover Federer is the second most talented player behind Federer in the post Agassi/Sampras era. Quite a few experts think Safin is actually MORE talented than Federer, but he had problems with motivation and injuries. Everytime he started playing well, he would get injured. I really think that could have been the best rivalry of all time, the Safin Federer rivarly.
davd1986 2 weeks ago
@davd1986 when federer plays on 100 procent, like he was 2006 with perfect backhand and super-perfect forehand, there is no player who can play with him..even djokovic and nadal
zelenolisce 20 minutes ago
And Hewitt...
911801111801 2 weeks ago
@tapobonn Del Potro? Wait I heard that name somewhere...Where was it...??? Oh yes I know! US Open 2009,semi final: Del Potro-Nadal 6-2,6-2,6-2! (just an example how powerless Nadal is when someone is having a great day).
vuk911 2 months ago
@tapobonn I may get ridiculed for sayin this, but Safn at his very best could out play the likes of Nadal, who was (Not saying is because of their recent 6-3, 6-0 showdown) Federer's great nemesis. Federer dealt with Safin repeatedly, and in 2006 Federer finished the season 92 wins to 5 losses, and that year also sparked the Fed-Nadal rivalry. Federer, at his very best, can out-play and out-maneuver any player on this friggin' planet.
addy72222 2 months ago
u forgot to mention that he lost to safin in 2005 australian open dumbfuck
Killuminati1996 2 months ago
@Killuminati1996 1 loss in lord knows how many matches the two've contested? After the Aussie open 2005, Fed has never lost to Safin in a GS match.
addy72222 2 months ago
federer was in his prime at the time, thats the point. so he wasnt unbeatable, he just didnt have worthy opponents. had safin been tougher mentally and cared more about matches, he could have easily challenged him. then nadal showed up and beat prime federer easily. young djokovic also beat him in his prime. then came del potro, muray tsonga. if all of them were in their primes during that time, federer wouldnt have half of his slams
Killuminati1996 2 months ago
7:55-7:56 Sniper
Only Roger............
DoofyMFC 5 months ago
If this time djoko would have known that he is allergic to gluten.. then after federer djokovic would be the one who would have dominated.. nadal probably would have never become world number 1
satishsatishiyer 5 months ago
Extremely talented, how the heck do they pull off those moves so well.
Dimitri0809 6 months ago
wheres HD??? dude thats why you get dislikes, cuz you promise HD and there aint no fucking HD FOR FUCKS SAKE !!! FUUUUCK!!!
DenisTheMennnace 6 months ago
hi
theColouringPage 7 months ago
I cant believe this guy has got 34 thumbs up for insulting this poor fellow who's just trying to cheer his little heart out. What is wrong with you people?
0507590 7 months ago 25
@0507590 what ahppened? pls explain! ;)
TheRafaelBond 1 month ago in playlist Weitere Videos von intruZo1991
I hope Djokovic doesn't become like the rest of his faggot family.
BrotherTree1 7 months ago
@BrotherTree1 Yeah, it's scary to think that he is the best behaved of that bunch.
davd1986 7 months ago in playlist Videos Sport Tennis 6
boo!!!!!!
clayton2128 7 months ago
FEDERER STRIIIIIKKKKEEE!!!
MahiMahiBaby 7 months ago
This great match really deserved five sets...
Lightysword 8 months ago
5:00 besst poinnnt ever !
Leksandraaa 8 months ago
@Leksandraaa 7:31 is a contender too
tomasdelonge182 7 months ago
@tomasdelonge182 what are yhu on abouut. shussh djokovic is the best fuck the rest !
3Andiii 7 months ago
@3Andiii ?? wth?
tomasdelonge182 7 months ago
This ended federer's "10 final streak"...
Bangandurded 8 months ago
Djokovic tries way too hard at being the man.
metsot 8 months ago
@metsot he doesnt try. he is the man.
BezCiceNemaPrice 8 months ago
Apart from Federer being the all time greatest player he's been the most graceful as well.
metsot 8 months ago
Comment removed
metsot 8 months ago
Seriously are there more annoying people than djokovic's parents..
nbss 8 months ago
@nbss nope
iRUSTYZz 8 months ago
I don't know how, but I just fucking HATE nole's family; they're so provocative
NexxtGen 8 months ago
djorkovic is your daddy
einentiva 8 months ago
dont forget Roger is PERFECT but he is still human guys
infiniteobscure 8 months ago
7:56 take that!
Rus6ATP 8 months ago
6:56 -7:08
Rus6ATP 8 months ago
fuck djokovic he hes mathafucker rasist like other serbs
psy23232 8 months ago
@psy23232
Ohh c'mon, you don't have to swear ;)
Greets from a Serbian in Switzerland =D
SlyHaku 8 months ago
@psy23232 that is a stereotipe of serbians, he is a gentlemen not a rasist
cortadew 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@psy23232 Fuck off what do you know about Serbia?
DRUNKMh 7 months ago
I am not saying nadal will last forever. Like i said he has something like 2 yrs left in him. Especially if he manage his schedul a lil better
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
30 people still using the lame mono excuses why djoko won. Get over it, cuz fed was ok until he met djoko. It happen again this yr and same result in str8 set at AO 11. Back then djoko was on a role, until his confidence went south. Now it's back and he is more focus. This coming from a nadal's fan. That's how much respect towards djoko.
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
the year federer started to decline
raoulhery 8 months ago
djokovic's family is annoying
ExtremeTurd 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anyone want to see a new video about djokovic that gives you a great feel for who he is? check out my channel.
caligirl2130 9 months ago
HD my fuckin ass!!!!!! just kidding ; P
MrMALUCATION 9 months ago
7.55-I HAD ENOUGH OF IT.
blerand91 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Djokovic pawned that arrogant fool
Globox822 9 months ago
Nadal its not playing at his best now, and Novak its beastlike this season so far..
statistic90 9 months ago
@statistic90 how is he now playing his best when he is in every master final this season. Winning 2 tournaments in which Djokovic didn't play and getting injured at AO, or he would even there be in the final(probably). Please, I am sick of this BS that player A isn't playing his best, yet he is in every final. Djokovic is outplaying him atm, that simple. Or am I going to say that in past Djokovic wasn't playing his best so that is why he didn't win more GS. it's stupid, fanboy excuse.
Globox822 9 months ago
@Globox822 am not a fanboy of anyone or anyteam.... its funny how do u call me that and show how fanboy of djoko u are, well, nadal its playing good, hes the number 1 you know, its for some reason, but if u have seen him at his best on clay, its obvius hes not playing at his very best, if u dont see that, dont miss time to reply me xD
statistic90 9 months ago
@Globox822 trust me djokovic is scared of federer but not nadal. He only shows respect to federer. But he rally gung ho against nadal cus nadal always played same way. Federer is unpredictable and difficult to handle for him. Nadal is better matchup to him but i think he is declining in muscles and novak improved on his BH to counter top spin.
youziness 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@youziness I disagree. I don't think it's about matchup. Its more about nadal game has dip, while djoko is on the rise. It's a temporary thing. I don't expect him to continue for ever. Nadal level been down since he won the USO 10. The only thing nadal is about is GS and YEC. Maybe adding few more master titles he haven't won yet to his collection.
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 i dont expect nadal to continue forever too. He start his prime in 2005 or 06. Its reasonable to see it end in 2011, tennis players have 5 yrs at most playing at their best. Only blind fanboys think his prime started in 2010. Its about who is better when they are at their worst. When he can't outrun everyone anymore, his real level of tennis skill will be exposed.
youziness 8 months ago
@youziness Prime years 05 or 06? I disagree i don't think nadal was in his prime yet. It's like saying pete was in his prime when he won 90 USO. Nah he wasn't yet until mid 93 that was when his prime started. Nadal prime started in 08. He had a set back in 09 with the injuries and return back to the form in 10. I would say he still got couple more yrs left in him to rack up more titles. Fed prime yr started in 04 and lasted 08. Djoko is in his prime now.
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 I agree with you, IIRC Federer's 2004 was when he only lost 4 matches but ended in END of 2008, Im a Fed fan and I won't take away the credit from nadal when he beat fed in wimby.
calugcug21 8 months ago
@calugcug21 I hear you bro. Looking forward to tomorrow matchup. Could be another Fedal final. I like nadal over delpo in 4, and i think fed will win in 4. The other matches with djoko, murray, tsonga, and berdych can go either way.
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 I just want Fed to win wimby. It can be better if nadal can't go to the final so fed can be number 1 again
calugcug21 8 months ago
@calugcug21 Ok i see. I am nadal fan and before him came on the scene. I was a sampras fan. So i am going to have some bias feelings towards fed. I don't want him to get number 1 or win again. I would like pete to still own the record at number 1 and also 7 W titles. Fed already have enough records for himself which he can keep. He is already well accomplish. I would rather murray win one than see fed win any again. I am not so for djoko. He is getting a bit arrogant to me.
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 that's sad
calugcug21 8 months ago
@calugcug21 I still like fed, just don't want him to have everything. He is already accomplish his feat. I mean if he gets there, well fine. But not going to support it cuz i want nadal to continue for another few yrs at that spot. I am not feeling djoko. Eventhough he is a charismatic type. Eventhough i would want nadal to get a crack at him cuz i know nadal can beat him. I just feel like it might be another fedal final to be honest.
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 all I want is Fed winning wimby becoming number 1 and stays for 2 weeks and retires or Fedal final 5 sets and fed gets his revenge and retires, window's closing for fed and i want him to retire winning
calugcug21 8 months ago
@calugcug21 retired? U forgot that fed said he want to play till he is 35 and also win Gold medal in 2012. He also set his site on 20 GS. Maybe you never saw his interview. Eventhough it seem unlikely he will set that goal. Cuz too much guys are hungry for the title thing. Chance are dindling for him. It will be hard especially with novak and delpo on the rise. Not to mention other big stars. I am hearing about this new guy that play like fed? Some Dimitrov i think his name
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 I knew that interview, all Im saying is he is not the same and even though he still can beat anybody on the tour at any surface playing at his best those goals are difficult to reach. I'm just saying I want Fed to retire when he's still on top of the tennis world. grigor dimitrov?
calugcug21 8 months ago
@calugcug21 Damn i am in stocker believe mood right now. How did fed blew the match like that? He just gave up after set 4 completely. I know tsonga is good, but i thought fed just didn't executed good in the late couple of set. I would of said fed would win in 4. But lose in 5 when leading after 2 set? Nah it's crazy what happen. I give tsonga a chance to upset djoko tomorrow in 5. I also like nadal to beat murray in 4.
Thutmosis7 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 yeah so sad you know. Something quite ironic is before the match I said to myself that Tsonga has no chance of winning this unless he plays out of his mind. I give credit to him although it's clear that federer relaxed and when it came to the 5th set, he was shocked and unable to deliver. I am hoping for a nadal-tsonga final now
calugcug21 8 months ago
@Thutmosis7 u never know what federer was thinking. Maybe he knows djokovic can beat nadal easier with his 2 handed backhand and peak game. So there he gave djokovic easy game against tsonga to rest. The winner is both djokovic and federer. If he closed out tsonga he may go thru thinking he only had energy to deal with 1 of them. Whoever is no.1 is irrelevant already. I am not surprised if fed close out his QF match to enter SF of USO meeting nadal later on. Deal with djoko is another day.
randykarmakum 8 months ago
4:55 Win
knxdt 9 months ago
sick yeah right
bayya1968 9 months ago
Nole is so much buffer these days LOL comparing this match to his matches on hard court this year and he looks like a totally different player. Better serve, better ground strokes (esp that backhand!), better volleying, and much much better fitness. He can keep pace with the likes of Rafa in those 20+ shot rallies and he just reads the game better now than he ever has. What a phenomenal start. Nole OWNS.
mtranucf 10 months ago
No Nadal hasn't IN my opinion. He couldn't defend Well enough against Djokovic in Indian wells or Miami!
Matthew9818 10 months ago
3:30 "Get that shit out my face!"
sasuke1994pown 10 months ago 11
@sasuke1994pown haha
rogerfan16 7 months ago
Nadal has the best defense in the world!!!!!!!
nedcahhh 10 months ago
1:08 Best shot of the match!
FigureOurYourself1 10 months ago
i have this actually on dvd
hehno1 10 months ago
the best players today.. in my opinion
MrPulpo111 10 months ago
lol at 3:30 djokovic pulls off a tweener and Fed's like "no. that's MY shot" and he put that shot out ;] what a beast. amazing players, both of them.
goodcommentguy 10 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
theres like no spin on that toss..
AndresRoddick1 11 months ago
i think fed will win his last grand slam this year. then the battle will be nadal vs djokovic.
i hope del potro will come back strong like 2009.
ognaka 11 months ago
man i can not understand autor of this video...i mean djokovic won and he puts allmost only federers points...come on he can not had win only by runing around...i hate when people do that...
TheKulinac 11 months ago
I've already commented on here once, but I gotta admit this was a sweet sweet match from both players. On a slightly different note, federerbestclass, you are becoming the embodiment of aids on youtube; commenting on every single of Fed's recently tagged videos with sentences which don't even make sense; example, ''Federer, best! great job, player MONO ever..amazing!''. Yeah we get it buddy you have a raging hard-on for Fed, but please pack it in and unsubscribe. Oh ye btw guys... 7:55 wtf?!
pistolpete58 11 months ago
sorry Federer need five sets to beat 34 years old agassi in US open 2004 QF and he also need 4 sets to beat 35 years old in US open 2005 Final.
chhunvorn 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it is shame that solid players like nadal(2006), djokovic(2008), murray(2008)
, del potro(2009) come up a bit late, if those fours could have played their best tennis since 2004, i think right now Roger he could only won 5 or 6 grand slams.
chhunvorn 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it is shame that solid players like nadal(2006), djokovic(2008), murray(2008)
, del potro(2009) come up a bit late, if those fours could have played their best tennis since 2004, i think right now Roger he could only won 5 or 6 grand slams.
chhunvorn 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it is shame that solid players like nadal(2006), djokovic(2008), murray(2008)
, del potro(2009) come up a bit late, if those fours could have played their best tennis since 2004, i think right now Roger he could only won 5 or 6 grand slams.
chhunvorn 11 months ago 2
Please stop calling this fake bastard federer is GOAT, because he does not deserve it. He needed five set to beat 34 old agassi, he was very lucky, because his serve save him so many time, and agassi's serve was rubbish. If agassi could serve like Kalovic sampras djokovic and roddick, he would actually destroy federer easily may be in three straight set. Moreover federer just beat weak players like roddick, hewitt etc. to win his grandslams.
chhunvorn 11 months ago
@chhunvorn dude, ur's retarded, know ur facts ~ he also beat nadal years ago, and many times before, and he's not a weak player
vampireknightrock100 11 months ago
@vampireknightrock100 Dude he only beat nadal 2 times in grandslam(wimbledon 2006, 2007), but nadal beat him 6 times in grandslam(French open 2005,2006,2007,2008, Wimbledon 2008, Australia open 2009), and he still has negative record against nadal who has poor serve(even poorer then agassi). When he lost to djokovic in Australia open 2008, 2011 in straight sets, federer fans said he was sick and old. But when he beat 34 years old agassi in us open 2004 QF and 2005 Final, they just keep silence.
chhunvorn 11 months ago
@chhunvorn Speaking badly about Federer can only mean that for the past 10 years you have been probably watching curling or syncronised swimming. Federer is the best tennis player that there has ever been. Once Nadal, Djokovic or any other player will have won more grand slam titles than him, then, and only at that point you will be able to say the contrary.
symba 11 months ago
@symba
I agree that Federer is the best ever (with Sampras a close second).
Nadal, though, has been making very fast progress, better than Fed at the same age. I could easily see Nadal surpass Fed's number of slams.
guineapig55555 11 months ago
@chhunvorn i agree with you fully. dont forget murray (twice), phillipoussis, gonzalez, baghdatis, soderling and a 35 year old agassi mega lols.
pistolpete58 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
great win Djoko. Roger was sickness and slump. MONO. I sorry for Roger
federerbestclass 11 months ago 24
@federerbestclass Oh Federer lost, does that mean Roger had mono at the US Open 2010, Australia 2011, Dubai, Indian Wells?
ArjunJethwa 11 months ago
@ArjunJethwa I like Djokovic. When he turns 28, 29, 30 years old. Does you think that he is still in top 10? I don't think so. sorry.
federerbestclass 11 months ago
@federerbestclass I think Djokovic will always be in the top 10 for the rest of career, just like Federer will be.
ArjunJethwa 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@federerbestclass
Lemme guess. he lost to Nadal at Roland Garros cause he had e-coli?
TheQueHegan 8 months ago
@TheQueHegan hi. Roger is an old player. 30 years old. Still he win to Heyday Djokovic. ? or, ATP finals 5th record champion. ?
federerbestclass 8 months ago
Federer FOR EVER BEST and then a long time nothing and somewhere a player named Djokovic......
MultiChoir 11 months ago
7.56 s1ck :)
UltimateTopspin 1 year ago
retard at 7:11
kobasica 1 year ago 33
@kobasica e ususkuje Federer sina i kaze mu sin : tata kad porastrem ja bih voleo da igram ko Djokovic, a cale mu odgovara : i tata bi sine ... xD
vaskeddaske 9 months ago