i'm no physicist (i aspire to be) but i study physics in my spare time and i 99% agree with sheldon the 1% is because you can never be 100% sure with quantum mechanics and these high end physics areas....they're weird :P
look on the bright side . said sheldon ,..hahha,he attempted to comfort leonard,by bring up a completely irrelevant issue..and said look on the bright side .
first i loled hard about your post. thought you would be something like "haha, i'm so clever, others can't see what i see...". then some people i know watched this scene, and they rly didnt get it. I was like "OMG, you Noobs!!1", then i realizd you're right. This moment Einstein came to me head: "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." Hail to the King Baby!
Clearly the answer is loop quantum gravity, if matter were made up of 1 dimensional oscilations being classed as strings then they would occupy no space in most directions but as we can see there is an observable accumulation of space in all dimensions therof thus proving that matter is three dimensional, string theory only works if you assume that 7 more dimensions can be added to the universal model. BAZINGA!
CBS... just barely touching the surface of actual topics and substance and taking it back a notch so the audience learns nothing. Where are the potato chips? These folks is funny right here. I know that cause the people in the audience laugh and tell me when the funny parts is.
@sublipdick A show that I loved and adored and watched faithfully removed their laugh track. I still laughed but felt like a total noob. Not because I had no queue to follow but because I felt stupid laughing alone in my living room. Laugh tracks are there to make it feel like like an inclusive experience, to let you know know you're not the only one that thinks something is funny.Only the mindless use it just to know when to laugh.I also think you underestimate the intelligence of the audience.
My friend and i had an "talk" about this because she agreed with Loop Quantum Gravity and i agreed with String Theory we didn't speak for a WHOLE week LOL
@Julietteisme So Leonard ignored Penny being stupid for months, yet decides to argue & lose a women over the merits of String Theory v LQG?.......now whos' the dumb Leonard?
even sheldon is suprised at "how do we raise children with that?" ... kids need to know loop quantum gravity to be raised by their parents ...(they can't choose a theory!)
lets say we knew what Eistein's last work of the theory of everything was; and consequently we published it around the world, by what physicist now know, would it have been accepted as a general theory of the cosmos, or would they're still be critics saying that it's all hawsquash, and move on to more detailed later theories, i say f: it we know that the universe is not all controlled by one super majestic force, and rather, is relative to sane and at the same time caotic unusual behavior
"matter clearly consist of thiny strings"-not much of an argument, cus strings aren't really proved, so you can't say that matter "clearly" consist of thiny strings..didn't expect this from Shledon
@nekontears Actually i think that this answer comes from a series of calculations with the π number or Pi if you want π or Pi = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510
What's really funny is that reading all the posts, only a very few see the parallel parental debate and conflict in religious values. It's the same arguement as, "I'm a catholic and if we're going to marry, you must be a catholic too or the deal's off!" Point being - as Leonard points out - is that it's still largely as hypothetical as arguing the proof of a supreme being. Great scene!
@rjworks13 Yes, but the reason that the conflict in deciding a theory seems less important is because most religions advocate consequences for this life - in an "afterlife" (day of judgement, heaven/hell etc.). There's no such reprimand in loop quantum vs. string theory.
In LQG, 'spin networks' represent the quantum states of the geometry of space-time. However LQG is not completely back-ground independent, it requires a topology that doesn't change. In additon to this LQG seems to be non-Lorentz invariant.
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
It turns out both theories have some merit- ironically we would actually have to wait untill the end of the universe to proove either one being wrong. I have this theory on the Instanton substructure of matter, but my thesis was deemed heracy and was burned at the proverbial stake by my superiors. I now have to accept string theory as being true- I feel like my Muslim medicine friends who have Darwinian evolution shoved down their throats- WHEN WILL THE LIES END!!!
I sense a lot of quantum nerd rage going on in this thread. Is this a good time to posit that the universe was intelligently designed by a Creator? :D
@69erthx1138 Isn't a hole (or topologically something which would effect the Euler characteristic) different to an irregular singular point? How would the Euler characteristic change of the solution space to a differential equation with an irregular singular point?
mathematicians are horrified at physical theories because the real world is absolute mess. so physics is messy. but the one place where things are absolutely crystal clear is in pure mathematics.
That's why I like 64 tetrahedron grid model (creating a cube octahedron (isotropic vector equilibrium) describing the geometry of space. creating singularity and is the geometry in polarity and in perfect symmetry to hold a sphere.
Absolutely accurate! I studied both and saw maths as a language for physicists, chemists and biologists to use for describing models of the world, and as a tool box for solving problems related to those fields. These days, after tutoring a few people in maths on its own, I gotten around to thinking of it as a source of beauty in and of itself.
Sounds bloody pathetic to most, but bollocks to them!
@TheEarthforge I don't think mathematics is derived from philosophy. If that were the case, then the truthness of theorems would be questioned and would become all "subjective" which is not the case in pure mathematics obviously. Because philosophy is subjective and open to different interpretations. But I don't also think philosophy is derived from mathematics as philosophy is not all about abstractions and formalization.
@Hemul137 You're assuming as if philosophy is all about logic. Only analytic philosophy may be objective because it relies on certain rules of logic. But what about the rest? General philosophy is merely about personal opinions. We're talking about the absoluteness of these two subjects. If we concern their pureness, a quote by Frege explains it all - "Every good mathematician is at least half a philosopher, and every good philosopher is at least half a mathematician."
Non - analytic philosophy is non-sense in its purest form, full of contradictions, obscurities for the purpose of sounding smart and other failures, so I didn't even consider it.
I don't think anyone who is reasoning logically takes non-analytic philosophy seriously, only some pseudo-intellectuals and some people in humanities who don't understand the point of logical argumentation embrace it.
@TheEarthforge You're confusing the meaning of preciseness/rigor with purity. Both mathematics and philosophy are pure. However, it is very wrong to say that philosophy is crystal clear as people may have different opinions about things.
I didn't say physics is bad. I only said physics is complicated because it concerns real world.
@palindrome06 I merely used your logic there. Historically, mathematics is derived from philosophy. That's where the concept of logic comes from, the central pivot of 99.99% of mathematics.
You said physics is messy. When approached correctly, physics can be very beautiful and clear. However, unification theories are evidence of the worst of physics in their messiness.
@TheEarthforge Logic is a tool for mathematics. The study of reasoning itself is both a part of mathematics and philosophy. It is better to clarify what you mean by mathematics. If you mean reasoning, then you're just using the rules of classical logic. But if you mean the mathematical universe by itself then it is not true to say numbers or other abstractions are derived from philosophy as numbers for example were used historically before philosophy was taken into consideration.
Just how logic is a tool for math, math is a tool for physics.
Philosophy is the one who concerns self with what that even means for math objects to exist, in math you merely compute things (or "prove" if you wish - same thing, it is all set theory or tautologies anyway) in the same way you use
math in physics, you don't question basics (like existence).
But in physics you go step further, you actually debate the axioms, while math. can't do that - that is philosophers job.
"mathematicians are horrified at physical theories because the real world is absolute mess. so physics is messy. but the one place where things are absolutely crystal clear is in pure mathematics."
the world is an absolute mess only if you see reality in dualist terms, which can be altered while viewing reality in a Ultra-Delta brain frequency perspective. Or "enlightenment".
@palindrome06 Mathematics is the language of physics. I don't think the mathematicians are that horrified, because the world isn't all that messy. The ones who are horrified with physical theories are the ones that make the observations, because sometimes theory and observation don't add up at first. Which calls for better theory and/or better observation.
@Mirakelmannen But this doesn't horrify physicists, it excites them. Because then they have the opportunity to discover something new and formulate a new theory.
i am sorry, but that´s not correct! Either pure mathematics isnt able to predict spontaneous nuclear decay or the humans are not able to find a way to "make it" understandable. And this is only one example. Greets
leslie is a quack
kelvinmok10 3 weeks ago 2
we need Michio Kaku on a episode
eltigre1201 3 weeks ago
@eltigre1201 YES! :D
Floortjahh 2 weeks ago
You cut off the last part of the "Comicon" joke (which was Leonard's response).
codebreaker2001 3 weeks ago
BTW stop prefering theories and study them.
bulkrivero 1 month ago
Actually string theory studies black holes entropy according to Bekenstein-Hawking results.
bulkrivero 1 month ago
Any one here think Leslie is hot
Tomsever 1 month ago
String theory was just proven by a supercomputer, so string theory for sure.
bumrang 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bumrang
No string theory has not been "Proven" yet. What is your source?
nolobede 1 month ago
@bumrang -- do tell! What supercomputer, wherem when? Was it really a proof? Of what? Need. More. Detail.
:-)
virumoz 1 month ago
The Looped string quantum gravity theory, there! I solved it!
MisterMortarious 1 month ago
arghhh Leslie should just give in to Sheldon's ways...
Sheldon = awesome
Leslie = annoying :)
stormEx11 1 month ago
I perfer my space stringy not loopy.
Glassjawfighter 2 months ago
i'm no physicist (i aspire to be) but i study physics in my spare time and i 99% agree with sheldon the 1% is because you can never be 100% sure with quantum mechanics and these high end physics areas....they're weird :P
1KevinsFamousChili1 2 months ago
hahaha lol la rivalidad cósmica de las cuerdas contra los bucles para engendrar la gravedad cuántica va para largo si no sale algo del LHC ñ_ñ
juantorres27 2 months ago
Look on the bright side
what bright side?
only nine more months till comic con
Oh yah
LOL
rubydelta6 2 months ago
Sounds more like politics to me.
Heroof1Darkness 2 months ago
I weould prefer String Theory, even though I don't like any of them, haha.
TheisticThinker 2 months ago
You're all wrong! It's E8!! (just joking)
JohananRaatz 2 months ago
Loop Quantum Gravity, String Theory isn't background independent.
JohananRaatz 2 months ago
He 'says' he going to overlook it. But he doesn't really...
TheWrathfulHippie 3 months ago
Sheldon Cooper: Look on the bright side.
Leonard Hofstadter: What's the bright side?
Sheldon Cooper: Only 9 more months to Comic Con.
theresistancerises 3 months ago
even sheldon looks stumped at 1:50
nekontears 3 months ago
One of them is Jewish.
shurednichso 4 months ago
bros before hoes!!,lol
jordanzs521 4 months ago
LOOP QUANTUM GRAVITY!!!
Look at the math. It just makes more sense.
Anthonyk312 4 months ago 2
Sheldon: "Oh you are so............so...."
*Leonards face xD*
Leslie: "Listen i gotta go but if you come up with an adjective..Text me!!"
Funniest line ever <3
MizzMickieJames 4 months ago
String Theory. No question.
kidkong584 4 months ago 56
Loop Quantum Gravity of course
1theWal1 5 months ago
String theory FTW
malnar1996 5 months ago
the end is missing!
angel2901 5 months ago
look on the bright side . said sheldon ,..hahha,he attempted to comfort leonard,by bring up a completely irrelevant issue..and said look on the bright side .
14physician 5 months ago
People sound so smart on the internet. x)
lgoopio 5 months ago
@lgoopio hahahahaha, that's includes you, hahaha peace out
joshua50101 3 months ago
did anyone notice that leslie was sitting on sheldon's spot?
jerq887 6 months ago 66
The string theory is correct.
Elcollpohorrible 6 months ago
seems similar to the stupid discussion about religion
it´s really bad how many people raise their children with their own religion and do not wait until the children are old enough to choose for themself
GoldenCrusader93 6 months ago 6
Sheldon's reaction on 1:50 is priceless
mrgezau 6 months ago
dear mr. rjworks13:
first i loled hard about your post. thought you would be something like "haha, i'm so clever, others can't see what i see...". then some people i know watched this scene, and they rly didnt get it. I was like "OMG, you Noobs!!1", then i realizd you're right. This moment Einstein came to me head: "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." Hail to the King Baby!
MTJPB 7 months ago 2
Clearly the answer is loop quantum gravity, if matter were made up of 1 dimensional oscilations being classed as strings then they would occupy no space in most directions but as we can see there is an observable accumulation of space in all dimensions therof thus proving that matter is three dimensional, string theory only works if you assume that 7 more dimensions can be added to the universal model. BAZINGA!
BlackAssassinBlade 7 months ago
-look on the bright side...
-whats the bright side?
-only 9 more month to comicon
-oh yeah...
xD
marto282 7 months ago 3
Comment removed
oligocene 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi ! If you like TBBT, Sheldon's "Bazinga", and/or the song Soft Kitty , then just click on my name to watch the video I just made :-)
And then, if you liked it of course, thumb-up this comment !! ^.^ Thanks :-)
TBBT = BEST SHOW EVER !!!!!!!!!!
TheCrazyBishop 7 months ago 2
CBS... just barely touching the surface of actual topics and substance and taking it back a notch so the audience learns nothing. Where are the potato chips? These folks is funny right here. I know that cause the people in the audience laugh and tell me when the funny parts is.
sublipdick 7 months ago
@sublipdick A show that I loved and adored and watched faithfully removed their laugh track. I still laughed but felt like a total noob. Not because I had no queue to follow but because I felt stupid laughing alone in my living room. Laugh tracks are there to make it feel like like an inclusive experience, to let you know know you're not the only one that thinks something is funny.Only the mindless use it just to know when to laugh.I also think you underestimate the intelligence of the audience.
spacecowboy5000 7 months ago
loop quantum gravity, yeah right, keep dreaming
nick4399 7 months ago
LOL. "Boulderdash! Matter is CLEARLY made of strings!" Great argument xD
M3t4lManiac 8 months ago
Sheldon's face at 1:50 is just epic!!!!!
RazorBladedLover9 8 months ago
I'm going to have to go with Loop Quantum Gravity...
ZaneShadowcast 8 months ago
she was kind of like a female sheldon
TheKYLEdavid 8 months ago
spinors all the way
proberush 8 months ago
My friend and i had an "talk" about this because she agreed with Loop Quantum Gravity and i agreed with String Theory we didn't speak for a WHOLE week LOL
GeekyGirl1011 8 months ago
I love sheldon's face at 1:49 its hilarious!!
Sariel445 8 months ago
String Theory. 'Nough said!
Classified005 8 months ago
m-theory, done
willardftw 8 months ago
Comment removed
clodester 8 months ago
Comment removed
clodester 8 months ago
@clodester *Leonard. Dumby.
Julietteisme 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Julietteisme So Leonard ignored Penny being stupid for months, yet decides to argue & lose a women over the merits of String Theory v LQG?.......now whos' the dumb Leonard?
clodester 8 months ago
even sheldon is suprised at "how do we raise children with that?" ... kids need to know loop quantum gravity to be raised by their parents ...(they can't choose a theory!)
vadiethestar 8 months ago
Why do they have cheesey laughter after every sentence
W3BMAST3ER34 8 months ago
"Are you gonna let him talk to me like that?"
brilliant!
science trash talk :)
train1ng89 8 months ago
I prefer my mind loopy and my universe stringy.
arokh72 8 months ago
i think it's cool that they got these two together, it's a nice nod back to Rosanne
pititron40000 9 months ago 2
matter CLEARLY consists of tiny strings
gotta love sheldon's arguement..
h0wud0in2 9 months ago 3
@gilmancrush Ironically, what you just wrote describes religious people pretty well.
Radwar99 10 months ago
Gotta love the snort of derition! <3
ansekt93 10 months ago 2
"Tell me Leonard, how will we raise the children?" hahaha
osubuckeyefan16 10 months ago
Actually string theory DOES explain black hole entropy
KongRubix 10 months ago
To a certain extenet Leslie sounds mostly like Lenard's mother... Glad this did not work out.
Alexlemd 10 months ago
poppycock!!! i concur with Shelden
03link85 10 months ago
NO GOD CREATED THIS UNIVERSE
.... jks
michaelyang4 10 months ago
What are the tiny strings made up of? is that the end?
varnlestoff 10 months ago
@varnlestoff
it's probably not the end but it is matter and energy at the most fundamental level.
SodaTeaches 9 months ago
lets say we knew what Eistein's last work of the theory of everything was; and consequently we published it around the world, by what physicist now know, would it have been accepted as a general theory of the cosmos, or would they're still be critics saying that it's all hawsquash, and move on to more detailed later theories, i say f: it we know that the universe is not all controlled by one super majestic force, and rather, is relative to sane and at the same time caotic unusual behavior
'
junior1984able 10 months ago
scientific cock-block
331giovanni 10 months ago 2
here is new one: 6 people clicked dislike button.. :)
DrKillaser 10 months ago
String theory ftw! :D
moshpotpaul 11 months ago
@gilmancrush In a lot of cases it's because they do have the correct answer to every dang thing.
moshpotpaul 11 months ago 2
4 people think both Loop Quantum Gravity and String Theory are wrong.
Anthonyk312 11 months ago
@Anthonyk312 that joke just isn't funny anymore
AAandries 11 months ago
@AAandries yes it is.
Anthonyk312 11 months ago
An allusion to religion =)
comedyfavorite 11 months ago
LQG FTW.
String theory is a dead end.
TheChuchulainn 11 months ago
I love how the only actractive woman in this besides sheldon's sister is Penny,
TheCarlliinha 1 year ago
@TheCarlliinha I disagree, Leslie is kinda hot, in a sexy-librarian sort of way. Also, Howard's gf.
TheChuchulainn 11 months ago
@TheChuchulainn
ok, howard's gf is cute, but leslie is not,
TheCarlliinha 11 months ago
@TheCarlliinha so u dont think that Bernadette is hot??
damn!! i'd do that woman any minute of the day!!! i freaking love her
and Leslie is cute too ...
actually the only young main female cahracter tha i find not attractive is Amy Farrah Fowler
SickDream 10 months ago
a deal breaker HA!
TheStaticage01 1 year ago
how can this have 4 dislikes...any dislikes in that matter/..SHELDON COOPER FOR THE WIN
spnmemories 1 year ago
Sheldon- "Leonard, you are my friend, and friends support their friends; Apparently."
agentbob49 1 year ago
"matter clearly consist of thiny strings"-not much of an argument, cus strings aren't really proved, so you can't say that matter "clearly" consist of thiny strings..didn't expect this from Shledon
glumac16 1 year ago
@glumac16
lol I don't think they wanted a real argument of string theory vs lqg.
Jim1905 11 months ago
on wordpress is now a new site, tbbtroom
SheldonCooperSpock 1 year ago
@SheldonCooperSpock There is a TBBT ChatRoom on that site
SheldonCooperSpock 1 year ago
is she crazy???!!!!!! String theory unites quantum mechanics with general relativity much better than loop quantum gravity
josue9007 1 year ago
I rarely see this show but .... was fun
Qulopuaa 1 year ago
Lisbon!
aBLINKtoTHEpast 1 year ago
the answer is 42
nekontears 1 year ago 90
@nekontears
wasn't that the answer to the ultimate queastion from the book series Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy?
justinsegal55 6 months ago
@justinsegal55 yah, but the math was wrong!
nekontears 6 months ago
Comment removed
elias2732 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nekontears Actually i think that this answer comes from a series of calculations with the π number or Pi if you want π or Pi = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510
elias2732 5 months ago
@nekontears siri ftw
koutsou805 3 months ago
Interesting tongue twister:
LQG correct= Causality breaks down , no Cauchy surface.
pepicanable 1 year ago
Comment removed
pepicanable 1 year ago
Wow! It's David and Darlene back together again after all this time! awwww!
BellaRogueSinclair 1 year ago
@BellaRogueSinclair Well, not after the end of the video.
blenderpanzi 1 year ago
What's really funny is that reading all the posts, only a very few see the parallel parental debate and conflict in religious values. It's the same arguement as, "I'm a catholic and if we're going to marry, you must be a catholic too or the deal's off!" Point being - as Leonard points out - is that it's still largely as hypothetical as arguing the proof of a supreme being. Great scene!
rjworks13 1 year ago 27
@rjworks13 Yes, but the reason that the conflict in deciding a theory seems less important is because most religions advocate consequences for this life - in an "afterlife" (day of judgement, heaven/hell etc.). There's no such reprimand in loop quantum vs. string theory.
LightningDonkey 4 months ago
2/2
Plus it doesn't cover Big Bang singularity, it states that history can be traced back infinitely.
pepicanable 1 year ago
In LQG, 'spin networks' represent the quantum states of the geometry of space-time. However LQG is not completely back-ground independent, it requires a topology that doesn't change. In additon to this LQG seems to be non-Lorentz invariant.
pepicanable 1 year ago
lol, weren't these two on Rosanne together?
Exclius 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
RanaRene1425 1 year ago
lesley was in sheldon's seat.
FreedomValentine 1 year ago 5
Poor Leonard!!
Rosinakitty 1 year ago
Chuck Norris watches this show
KoParker343 1 year ago 2
cgpg.gravity.psu.edu/people/Ashtekar/articles/rovelli03.pdf is pretty good description of LQG
bejaysea2058 1 year ago
SHE'S SITTING IN SHELDON'S SPOT! NOBODY SITS IN SHELDON'S SPOT!!!!!
aragorn1780 1 year ago 38
COMIC CON <3
xKiB5 1 year ago
:( they missed my fave bit, leonard's reaction to comic con "oh yeah"
AndyJmovies 1 year ago
smack talk in the physics world...haha love it!
pagalpagli5 1 year ago
It turns out both theories have some merit- ironically we would actually have to wait untill the end of the universe to proove either one being wrong. I have this theory on the Instanton substructure of matter, but my thesis was deemed heracy and was burned at the proverbial stake by my superiors. I now have to accept string theory as being true- I feel like my Muslim medicine friends who have Darwinian evolution shoved down their throats- WHEN WILL THE LIES END!!!
SpecterReflector 1 year ago 3
Hořava-Lifshitz Gravity FTW
razorbladethorax 1 year ago
Comment removed
razorbladethorax 1 year ago
Not a good character, he's just fun to hate.
jumpinjax2 1 year ago
Is he kidding? String theory ain't got nothing on LQG. String theory isn't even falsifiable!
TheChuchulainn 1 year ago
@TheChuchulainn OK, I got a basic hang off string theory, but my physicist buddy wasn't able to explain LQG to me. Any help here?
GaolisVideoLog 1 year ago
"look on the bright side"
"whats the bright side?"
"only 9 more months to comic-con"
luv you Sheldon!
boycrazed1234 1 year ago
LQG > Strings!!!
bs0ul 1 year ago
Are you gonna let him talk to me like that? XD Brilliant.
QueenDeaconite 1 year ago 2
Why do I get the feeling Sheldon planned that breakup?
echock89 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks for posting. The Mrs took me to dinner but fortunately I saw the full episode online today at lastnightstvshows (.) com thankfully!
grumpyunderworl 1 year ago
Are you gonna let him talk to me like that?! Lol
sakurachicka 1 year ago
@SaberOtaku it generally doesnt matter unless he wants to sit in it.
19superbabe91 1 year ago
I sense a lot of quantum nerd rage going on in this thread. Is this a good time to posit that the universe was intelligently designed by a Creator? :D
HisDivineShadow245 1 year ago
@HisDivineShadow245 no. not likely.
4idiotsandalightbulb 1 year ago
It's never a good time to posit a theory that leads to an intellectual dead end. Especially not in any discussion that has to do with physics
SharinganKakashii 1 year ago
@SharinganKakashii Just trying to mix things up a bit. :D
HisDivineShadow245 1 year ago
@HisDivineShadow245 Good catalyst :D
SharinganKakashii 1 year ago
Look at the bright side, only 9 more months to comcocon :) ;) lol love TBBT!!!!!!!
myhuskyROXX 1 year ago
@myhuskyROXX
"9 more months to Comic Con" to those who didn't get it
mistermanlymens 1 year ago
@mistermanlymens oh, well sorry :/ didnt mean to get it wrong :)
myhuskyROXX 1 year ago
String theory is crap, that is fo sure!
mrlogic4u 1 year ago
String theory sells books... That's all it it good for...
InsaneGoonRules 1 year ago 5
I definitely missed something.
End of season 1- leonard + penny
3 pisodes later- leonad+lesley?
goldeneye007662 1 year ago
I totally 'prefer my space stringy not loopy' too..
AkeshaStratton 2 years ago 2
BAZZINGA!!!!
lauraclever 2 years ago 3
a snort of dericion
urbangirl911 2 years ago
COMICON!!!
perdeganha 2 years ago 4
I get almost all (in the lebesgue sense) the jokes in here, I'm such a nerd...
huntmatuk 2 years ago 4
@huntmatuk Most certainly, (in the Riemann sense) the jokes would have been full of holes, or as we say, "irregular singular points."
69erthx1138 2 years ago 2
@69erthx1138 Isn't a hole (or topologically something which would effect the Euler characteristic) different to an irregular singular point? How would the Euler characteristic change of the solution space to a differential equation with an irregular singular point?
huntmatuk 2 years ago
"How will we raise the children?!"
Kittyrebeccalai 2 years ago 9
mathematics! lol. come on! any true mathematician would be horrified at the ammount of mathematic rule breaking that goes on in physics!
username01225110590 2 years ago 4
mathematicians are horrified at physical theories because the real world is absolute mess. so physics is messy. but the one place where things are absolutely crystal clear is in pure mathematics.
palindrome06 2 years ago 59
That's why I like 64 tetrahedron grid model (creating a cube octahedron (isotropic vector equilibrium) describing the geometry of space. creating singularity and is the geometry in polarity and in perfect symmetry to hold a sphere.
Digalog 1 year ago
@palindrome06
Word!
Absolutely accurate! I studied both and saw maths as a language for physicists, chemists and biologists to use for describing models of the world, and as a tool box for solving problems related to those fields. These days, after tutoring a few people in maths on its own, I gotten around to thinking of it as a source of beauty in and of itself.
Sounds bloody pathetic to most, but bollocks to them!
Loved your comment!
psychobollox 1 year ago 15
@psychobollox Never heard of loop quantum gravity.
manvsminaua 9 months ago
@palindrome06 but that is what makes mathematics so boring!
coldwave44 1 year ago
@coldwave44 Mathematical beauty cannot be seen unless you actually do mathematics.
palindrome06 1 year ago
@palindrome06 spherical chickens in a vacuum are crystal clear too!
IsilionNELE 1 year ago
@palindrome06 Nope - mathematics is derived from philosophy, so using your logic, philosophy is the most crystal clear.
But it hardly changes the fact that physics is the most awesome. Ever.
TheEarthforge 1 year ago
@TheEarthforge I don't think mathematics is derived from philosophy. If that were the case, then the truthness of theorems would be questioned and would become all "subjective" which is not the case in pure mathematics obviously. Because philosophy is subjective and open to different interpretations. But I don't also think philosophy is derived from mathematics as philosophy is not all about abstractions and formalization.
palindrome06 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hemul137 1 year ago
@palindrome06 Logic is the realm of philosophy if you didn't know and yes,
philosophy is the foundation of everything, even science. Philosophy is all subjective?
Which philosophy class you learned that at? Surely not in analytic philosophy where most people agree on logic/etc.
Hemul137 1 year ago
@Hemul137 You're assuming as if philosophy is all about logic. Only analytic philosophy may be objective because it relies on certain rules of logic. But what about the rest? General philosophy is merely about personal opinions. We're talking about the absoluteness of these two subjects. If we concern their pureness, a quote by Frege explains it all - "Every good mathematician is at least half a philosopher, and every good philosopher is at least half a mathematician."
palindrome06 1 year ago
@palindrome06
Non - analytic philosophy is non-sense in its purest form, full of contradictions, obscurities for the purpose of sounding smart and other failures, so I didn't even consider it.
I don't think anyone who is reasoning logically takes non-analytic philosophy seriously, only some pseudo-intellectuals and some people in humanities who don't understand the point of logical argumentation embrace it.
Hemul137 1 year ago
@Hemul137
No need to ponder reality any more, I have the answer to every objective truth. Ask me.
VegasSkateCulture 1 year ago
@TheEarthforge You're confusing the meaning of preciseness/rigor with purity. Both mathematics and philosophy are pure. However, it is very wrong to say that philosophy is crystal clear as people may have different opinions about things.
I didn't say physics is bad. I only said physics is complicated because it concerns real world.
palindrome06 1 year ago
@palindrome06 I merely used your logic there. Historically, mathematics is derived from philosophy. That's where the concept of logic comes from, the central pivot of 99.99% of mathematics.
You said physics is messy. When approached correctly, physics can be very beautiful and clear. However, unification theories are evidence of the worst of physics in their messiness.
TheEarthforge 1 year ago
@TheEarthforge Logic is a tool for mathematics. The study of reasoning itself is both a part of mathematics and philosophy. It is better to clarify what you mean by mathematics. If you mean reasoning, then you're just using the rules of classical logic. But if you mean the mathematical universe by itself then it is not true to say numbers or other abstractions are derived from philosophy as numbers for example were used historically before philosophy was taken into consideration.
palindrome06 1 year ago
@palindrome06
Just how logic is a tool for math, math is a tool for physics.
Philosophy is the one who concerns self with what that even means for math objects to exist, in math you merely compute things (or "prove" if you wish - same thing, it is all set theory or tautologies anyway) in the same way you use
math in physics, you don't question basics (like existence).
But in physics you go step further, you actually debate the axioms, while math. can't do that - that is philosophers job.
Hemul137 1 year ago
@palindrome06---Really? Crystal clear? Jesus.....how come Im failing math, but science is my best grade? (frowns)
samdonelly7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@palindrome06
"mathematicians are horrified at physical theories because the real world is absolute mess. so physics is messy. but the one place where things are absolutely crystal clear is in pure mathematics."
the world is an absolute mess only if you see reality in dualist terms, which can be altered while viewing reality in a Ultra-Delta brain frequency perspective. Or "enlightenment".
VegasSkateCulture 1 year ago
@palindrome06 Mathematics is the language of physics. I don't think the mathematicians are that horrified, because the world isn't all that messy. The ones who are horrified with physical theories are the ones that make the observations, because sometimes theory and observation don't add up at first. Which calls for better theory and/or better observation.
Mirakelmannen 1 year ago
@Mirakelmannen But this doesn't horrify physicists, it excites them. Because then they have the opportunity to discover something new and formulate a new theory.
blenderpanzi 1 year ago
@palindrome06
i am sorry, but that´s not correct! Either pure mathematics isnt able to predict spontaneous nuclear decay or the humans are not able to find a way to "make it" understandable. And this is only one example. Greets
TheODEProject 1 year ago
@palindrome06 Is it? What about Gödel's incompleteness theorems?
blenderpanzi