@ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE Just about all of us are like that. That is why the best chess players like Garry Kasparov can think like 10 moves ahead. So he will think what are all the possible moves you can use and then counters it.
Brilliant game... kinda hate that queen sac at the end though... it's so uselessly flashy and I dislike such things, lol. Game is really good, though.
@jacovc1986 he could have saced his bishop and that's the way it should have been... sacing the queen without the need to do so is needlessly flashy and very "glitz-glamoury".
I would have done the little known move called Democracy Revolution. The pawns on both teams join together, kill the King and Queen, then party and get drunk while the knights argue politics and the Bishops are busy explaining why homosexuality is wrong. And the people go on tours to look at the rooks because castles are just cool.
Zukertort must have been having fun. Bg5 first works just as well as Qg5. It's still mate next move, but Zukertort chose the Q move to make the game flashier, more memorable. His prerogative, I suppose.
im sorry i didnt know what happened with the fork or whatever its called i play go just got bored and looked this up so stfu about how stupid i am because i didnt know what the hell was going on ok
There is a story that as a result of a tournament in 1914 the Tsar named Emanuel Lasker, José Raúl Capablanca, Alexander Alekhine, Siegbert Tarrasch, and Frank Marshall to be 'Grandmasters' but the term was in use long before then. Whether the Tsar coined the term or not he wasn't slack in picking three world champions and two that had lost matches for the world title. I'd say that Anderssen and Zuckertort were definitely Grandmaster class even if they didn't use the title.
I hate mates that move your queen because everyone knows it is a stupid move to move you queen at the beginning of the game so people can sense its coming
@settigirl1998 It's only stupid for a beginner to move his queen, a moderate player has no issues moving a queen early. Only inexperienced players, the only downside to moving your queen early is if you at any point blunder your queen, you pretty much lost.
@kikook222 It didn't matter if he knew it was mate in one if he took or not. His only move was to take, he was in check with no way to block and no squares to move to. I am suprised that at that point he didn't resign.
The queen move on video looks like a mistake... even on a real board it would be nearly impossible to resist. Still, Zukertort obviously researched a new position and its positive genius to find this and play it in a tournament. Thanks for the post
That was really smart of him to move the queen to threaten the knight, so black would move the queen to protect the knight and block off the king's escape. I would never be able to think up of that.
I would call it REALLY crucial, dude. You will feel its importance in games where your pawns have advanced deep into enemy territory. Like kikook222 says, and indeed, you yourself make the point, what makes it really crucial is that not many new players use it BECAUSE they don't know it, and sometimes it can be the difference between promoting your pawn or having it blocked by a stationary pawn.
The title "Grandmaster" was used to refer to the strongest players long before the time of these players. This is what Wikipedia has to say about this topic:
"The first known use of the term grandmaster in connection with chess was in an 1838 issue of Bell's Life, in which a correspondent referred to William Lewis as "our past grandmaster". Lewis himself later referred to Philidor as a grandmaster, and the term was also applied to a few other players."
Thanks for your comment dude. You suggest as if these two were average players who fall for "cheap tricks". Sure, chess theory was not as developed then, but they were still two of the best. About modern day grandmasters not falling for cheap tricks, I think Kramnik's "blunder of the century" is much worse. Here, at least there is a little combination, but Kramnik missed a mate-in-one, unthinkable for a good chess player. Stuff happens, not just in the old days but now as well.
@chrism216 Andersson DID fall for the cheap trick and Kasparov has stated that at that time he was one of the strongest players in the world. If you check out "MY GREAT PREDECESSORS" by G. Kasparov there are quite a few Anderssen games he analyzes, defintely at the level we would call Grandmaster today. As for "falling for a cheap shot like Qg5" well his position was already lost so it didn't much matter how the game concluded.
I wonder what would have happened at 0:52 if Anderssen had played Be8 instead of Qe8? I think the best for white after that would be f4, where black is still under a lot of pressure, but perhaps he can survive?
@SuperMyfamily01 Actually, never mind, Be8 results in a mate in 4. The best move according to Fritz is Qc8, but this loses Ng6, so the position is obviously lost. The decisive mistake by black was playing Ke7 at 0:48. He should have played Ke8 so that he could play ... Qf6 after white plays Qh5, after which the position is roughly equal.
@SuperMyfamily01 Bringing the bishop up reveals his plans to a greater degree. Putting his queen's head on the board tempted Anderssen into making the error.
@SuperMyfamily01 Oh please if you reseached and discovered that play its obvious to anyone that the queen sac was instrumental in making it work. Don't try and pretend that chess is exclusive of psychology, nothing is.
@SuperMyfamily01 The GM might've thinked that He was going for the Horse, so He moved His queen to defend the Horse, apparently, He's incorrect, Whoever's using the white is a very unpredictable player (Dunno who's black 'n white since there's no info about who's using the black and white)
A lot of games like this from the earlier days of chess (pre-1900 or so) are not actual "games", but rather they are "explorations" by two players into quick checkmates or sharp positions that they wouldn't have played under normal competitive circumstances. Still fun to watch and informative, IMO. Besides, I couldn't tell you 100% for sure that this game was "fabricated", just that it was a common thing to do back then.
Sure didn't. It's the kind of checkmate one usually expects to see a novice suffer at the hands of a seasoned player. Hard to believe a grandmaster suffered it.
mmm what about Ke8 instead of going e7?
DieguezZ 7 hours ago
Black should have blocked the check from the white bishop with his own instead of moving the king
DanielManahan 1 day ago
lol. weak
CruzmarvinG 2 days ago
best top two comments hahah.
rcrespo357 2 days ago
Tom Woods wuz here!
dfabian24 3 days ago
omg that's like one of the coolest checkmates that i have ever seen. This game goes to show you that a Queen sometimes is worth absolutely nothing!
syeddawdye747 6 days ago
Black could have done Pawn to A6 after white move his Bishop to B5.
dsadwarf 1 week ago
Rybka's Mind
WennieBoy01 1 week ago
the opponent's sooo bad
mattecarini 1 week ago
i am under the impression that many of us have missed chances at perfect checkmates and didnt even no it
ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE 2 weeks ago
@ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE Just about all of us are like that. That is why the best chess players like Garry Kasparov can think like 10 moves ahead. So he will think what are all the possible moves you can use and then counters it.
Eldinarcus 2 weeks ago
amazing use of the bishops
CharlieVeitch911LIAR 2 weeks ago
moral of the story: when the opponent offers you his queen, you know something is really wrong
I3uttSweat 3 weeks ago 22
@I3uttSweat It was too late by then. The Queen put him in check and he couldn't interpose.
MADMAC572 3 weeks ago
Great Strategy !! ;)
Pirlo0721 3 weeks ago
The queen sac was for show as Bg5+, hxg5, Qxg5 is also mate.
royplayer 3 weeks ago 3
ima try these moves, i'm still a beginner, I'm a noob
IxFito95xI 4 weeks ago
Once again: when your opponent offers you his Queen, you should suspect that disaster lies around the corner.
KevinByrne2 4 weeks ago
This was played in 1865, chess was basically played off of intuition. They had little theory to study from.
TheUniverseExists 1 month ago
HOLY SHIT ... NICE ONE
JuicersSuck 1 month ago
nice! But isn't the resistence kinda weak? why would anybody let bishop stay at b5?
MVHH
HarriHaffi 1 month ago
@HarriHaffi Indeed. In fact, it fell apart with Blacks pawn development and slowness to caste and then counter.
MADMAC572 3 weeks ago
brilliant queen sac
thugly921 1 month ago
oh very nice thank you very much for this.
MrPhil1912 1 month ago
@MrPhil1912
Glad you liked it, buddy.
adiladil78 1 month ago
fucking noob anderssen
Ke8 not e7 @ 0:47
Kinjutsuu 1 month ago
@Kinjutsuu yep, and then Qf6
Shadowboost 3 weeks ago
OMG i wish i was that good
qweboost23 1 month ago
at 0:18 the horse from G8 to E7? what's the reason?
AliGrulez 1 month ago
all i asked was what it was called ok that's it thanks to the 2 people that told me fuck the rest of you
thetyrousey 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
eeerrrttty 1 month ago
@endrake2 O.O AHAHAHHAHAHAHHALMALMALMAMAOAO
TheBlasianAsian 1 month ago
Holy shit!
1Moregano1 1 month ago
He made that classic mistake .. he lost!
Coastlinewalks 1 month ago
Brilliant game... kinda hate that queen sac at the end though... it's so uselessly flashy and I dislike such things, lol. Game is really good, though.
vanishy0urself 1 month ago
@vanishy0urself this is what make it beautiful! he couldn't have won without sacing his queen
jacovc1986 1 month ago
@jacovc1986 he could have saced his bishop and that's the way it should have been... sacing the queen without the need to do so is needlessly flashy and very "glitz-glamoury".
vanishy0urself 1 month ago
Checkmate
pizzaguy462 1 month ago
I would have done the little known move called Democracy Revolution. The pawns on both teams join together, kill the King and Queen, then party and get drunk while the knights argue politics and the Bishops are busy explaining why homosexuality is wrong. And the people go on tours to look at the rooks because castles are just cool.
endrake2 2 months ago 71
@endrake2 i agree
cvetko5 1 month ago
@endrake2
which one is "the people" chess piece?
BLaCkKsHeEp 1 month ago
@BLaCkKsHeEp The pawns of course :P
endrake2 1 month ago
@endrake2
sounds great to me
BLaCkKsHeEp 1 month ago
what a sexy queen sacrifice
jrmenard630 2 months ago 3
Zukertort must have been having fun. Bg5 first works just as well as Qg5. It's still mate next move, but Zukertort chose the Q move to make the game flashier, more memorable. His prerogative, I suppose.
irondogon 2 months ago
im sorry i didnt know what happened with the fork or whatever its called i play go just got bored and looked this up so stfu about how stupid i am because i didnt know what the hell was going on ok
thetyrousey 2 months ago
Actually a very complicated combination and sacrifice..
ManilasFinest2010 2 months ago
I've heard Bobby Fischer once won a match in one move.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
great trick. great play.
humanresourcism 2 months ago
And giving away the queen as well. Classic.
padperson 2 months ago
There is a story that as a result of a tournament in 1914 the Tsar named Emanuel Lasker, José Raúl Capablanca, Alexander Alekhine, Siegbert Tarrasch, and Frank Marshall to be 'Grandmasters' but the term was in use long before then. Whether the Tsar coined the term or not he wasn't slack in picking three world champions and two that had lost matches for the world title. I'd say that Anderssen and Zuckertort were definitely Grandmaster class even if they didn't use the title.
rwsmith29456 2 months ago
Amazing. I wonder why I haven't come across this brilliancy in my reading?
rwsmith29456 2 months ago
I always take a woman when it's open. Not always the best move ;)
LtStarkiller 2 months ago
Blacks mistake was QE8 ive made similar mistakes though
Bewarethe1 2 months ago
Awesome! 12th check mate, sacrificing a queen i'll do that to my classmate hahahaha. hope he doesn't know that move. =)
MLNforever 2 months ago
man, a checkmate with nothing but bishops in the 12th move!??!!
JsusDI 2 months ago
Good check mates
settigirl1998 2 months ago
I hate mates that move your queen because everyone knows it is a stupid move to move you queen at the beginning of the game so people can sense its coming
settigirl1998 2 months ago
@settigirl1998 It's only stupid for a beginner to move his queen, a moderate player has no issues moving a queen early. Only inexperienced players, the only downside to moving your queen early is if you at any point blunder your queen, you pretty much lost.
kikook222 2 months ago
Back then I guess they had a low expectation of their opponents because nowadays, GM's know that a Queen Blunder is rare.
kikook222 2 months ago
@kikook222 It didn't matter if he knew it was mate in one if he took or not. His only move was to take, he was in check with no way to block and no squares to move to. I am suprised that at that point he didn't resign.
13shepi 2 months ago
Anserssen moving the king to f7 was blunder one, and moving the queen behind it was blunder two so he deserved it
RexNunc 3 months ago
nice classic example, for a early kings attack and mate. Nice, like two bishops and weird kings position are enough to mate
Maliginobserver 3 months ago
aweh. poor 'thetrousey'
MsSaywhattt 3 months ago
pity this guy 'thetrousey'
YtubeUserr 3 months ago
brilliant!
itsmeemario89 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
google "gambitking" to play online chess
tillytally2101 3 months ago
Comment removed
rommelquilantang 3 months ago
Black simply missed the Q Sac.
Maartenols 3 months ago
Comment removed
OceanderTethyseus 3 months ago
Black king to E7?
doncabron23 3 months ago
@doncabron23 i was thinking the same thing... i would prob moved the king back to its original position
rgpfighter 3 months ago
The queen move on video looks like a mistake... even on a real board it would be nearly impossible to resist. Still, Zukertort obviously researched a new position and its positive genius to find this and play it in a tournament. Thanks for the post
Mezocosm 3 months ago
1 dislike by Anderssen's descendant
Neueregel 3 months ago
lol xD its easy to checkmate in 4 moves ...
GimpIsNuts 4 months ago
Huh, since when did Anderssen get a YouTube account?
OvoJeGovno 4 months ago
Typical Tal style f7 sac. 3..Ne7 = a huge blunder that allowed this
Neueregel 4 months ago
That was really smart of him to move the queen to threaten the knight, so black would move the queen to protect the knight and block off the king's escape. I would never be able to think up of that.
toiletscrubbr 4 months ago
DAYM WHEN HE PUT HIS QUEEN THERE I SAID stupid... then i saw the next move i said wow
AznAndy562 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no one else notice the pieces switching at 30?
thetyrousey 5 months ago
@thetyrousey
Pieces switching? It's called castling.
adiladil78 5 months ago 136
@adiladil78 never seen it before even when i play i dont see it but i mostly play go but ive seen a lot of chess but never this
thetyrousey 4 months ago
@adiladil78 LOL!
JESSExERA 4 months ago
@adiladil78 Okay... so we're making up new moves???
rog944 4 months ago
@adiladil78 lol... that's probably the noobiest comment I've ever seen haha
oreo8118 2 months ago
@thetyrousey ....really?
clockwise3559 4 months ago
@thetyrousey Hahaha!
SLACkBOOTFILMS 4 months ago
@thetyrousey
Castle is a legit move in chess.
BigDTinyE 4 months ago
Stupid
Knight to G3 at :33 makes no sense.
BigDTinyE 4 months ago
@thetyrousey you fucking idiot! hahahahha lmao pieces switching? you must play with lego's and children
EyeBlowTreez 4 months ago
@thetyrousey 16 years old and still don't know about castling? Of course, you're too busy banging your mother.
papalolita 3 months ago
@papalolita lol you're a fucking retard
pedarikarhu 3 months ago
lol
Mudcrab1337 3 months ago
@thetyrousey
/facepalm
rainbowburger 3 months ago
@thetyrousey LOL tha`s called castling ....^^
RandomStereotype 3 months ago
@thetyrousey Since you don't know what castling is, look up En Passant too, it's another crucial rule that many beginners don't know.
kikook222 2 months ago 14
@kikook222 its not TOO crucial.. as most players don't really use it.
wattacoolguy 1 month ago
@wattacoolguy
I would call it REALLY crucial, dude. You will feel its importance in games where your pawns have advanced deep into enemy territory. Like kikook222 says, and indeed, you yourself make the point, what makes it really crucial is that not many new players use it BECAUSE they don't know it, and sometimes it can be the difference between promoting your pawn or having it blocked by a stationary pawn.
adiladil78 1 month ago
@wattacoolguy
lol everybody use it .....
Kinjutsuu 1 month ago
@thetyrousey
Dumbass
imsopathetic1369 2 months ago
Comment removed
busterboypk 2 months ago
@thetyrousey its called a fork u idiot
DJCVIDE0S 2 months ago
@thetyrousey lol
fredderfnation 2 months ago
@thetyrousey LMAO you're so dumb..
LynxCoding 2 months ago
@thetyrousey
Why you even open your mouth? Lolz.
BigBoss1R 2 months ago
@thetyrousey lol learn the rules of chess before you make yourself look like an idiot.
24cincyreds 1 month ago
these arent grandmasters.
the title "grandmaster" appeared in the 20th century.
chrism216 5 months ago
The title "Grandmaster" was used to refer to the strongest players long before the time of these players. This is what Wikipedia has to say about this topic:
"The first known use of the term grandmaster in connection with chess was in an 1838 issue of Bell's Life, in which a correspondent referred to William Lewis as "our past grandmaster". Lewis himself later referred to Philidor as a grandmaster, and the term was also applied to a few other players."
adiladil78 5 months ago 13
@adiladil78 yes but it was a term merely describing a player's abilities, and there were very few men who people called "grandmasters".
a grandmaster by later standards would have never fallen for such cheap tactics. sure its beautiful to sac the queen, but a grandmaster?? dont know.
chrism216 5 months ago
@chrism216
Thanks for your comment dude. You suggest as if these two were average players who fall for "cheap tricks". Sure, chess theory was not as developed then, but they were still two of the best. About modern day grandmasters not falling for cheap tricks, I think Kramnik's "blunder of the century" is much worse. Here, at least there is a little combination, but Kramnik missed a mate-in-one, unthinkable for a good chess player. Stuff happens, not just in the old days but now as well.
adiladil78 5 months ago 13
@adiladil78 Anand has missed a mate in one as well!
thegreatsolar 1 month ago
@thegreatsolar
Really? That's a real shocker. When did this happen? Against who?
adiladil78 1 month ago
@adiladil78 Against Ivanchuk. watch?v=7Ix69sCFahw
thegreatsolar 1 month ago
@adiladil78 Actually Ivanchuk missed it vs Anand, hehe.
thegreatsolar 1 month ago
@thegreatsolar
Wow, dude. That was just awesome! Ivanchuk's nerves got the better of him. Great example of a GM missing a mate in one. Thanx.
adiladil78 1 month ago
schach-brett.de
Schachbenno 4 months ago
@chrism216 Andersson DID fall for the cheap trick and Kasparov has stated that at that time he was one of the strongest players in the world. If you check out "MY GREAT PREDECESSORS" by G. Kasparov there are quite a few Anderssen games he analyzes, defintely at the level we would call Grandmaster today. As for "falling for a cheap shot like Qg5" well his position was already lost so it didn't much matter how the game concluded.
PabloDPena 3 months ago
@chrism216 Zukertort n Anderssen not GMs? You're having a Steffi ..lol
SovereignFOTL 3 months ago
@chrism216 Zuckertort and Anderssen were both extremely strong players and would certainly be grandmasters today.
NumbFlynn 2 months ago
@chrism216
riotofdablood 3 months ago
I wonder what would have happened at 0:52 if Anderssen had played Be8 instead of Qe8? I think the best for white after that would be f4, where black is still under a lot of pressure, but perhaps he can survive?
SuperMyfamily01 6 months ago
@SuperMyfamily01 Actually, never mind, Be8 results in a mate in 4. The best move according to Fritz is Qc8, but this loses Ng6, so the position is obviously lost. The decisive mistake by black was playing Ke7 at 0:48. He should have played Ke8 so that he could play ... Qf6 after white plays Qh5, after which the position is roughly equal.
SuperMyfamily01 5 months ago
now this is good shit.
RawlstonLee 6 months ago
At 0:54 he could've just as well played Bg5, but he just just had to sac his queen didn't he!
SuperMyfamily01 8 months ago 36
@SuperMyfamily01 Queen sacs are very flashy :P
RsGhost1 6 months ago
@SuperMyfamily01 It would kill his bishop
albertlopez1234 5 months ago
@SuperMyfamily01 Bringing the bishop up reveals his plans to a greater degree. Putting his queen's head on the board tempted Anderssen into making the error.
Stonemeister 4 months ago
@Stonemeister but at that point it was already too late, what else could he do but catch it?
Mondrae205 4 months ago
@SuperMyfamily01
I think he want to mate his oponent, before hes resigns. He probably think: "Haha, I show you that, you didn't even realized what happens"
Sorry for my english
BATAMANish 4 months ago
@SuperMyfamily01 Oh please if you reseached and discovered that play its obvious to anyone that the queen sac was instrumental in making it work. Don't try and pretend that chess is exclusive of psychology, nothing is.
Mezocosm 3 months ago
@SuperMyfamily01 It's like the ultimate insult, "I could have sac'd my bishop, but I don't need my queen to win"
kikook222 2 months ago
@SuperMyfamily01 The GM might've thinked that He was going for the Horse, so He moved His queen to defend the Horse, apparently, He's incorrect, Whoever's using the white is a very unpredictable player (Dunno who's black 'n white since there's no info about who's using the black and white)
TheKittyCharm 2 months ago
That is just beautiful!!
keyar87 9 months ago
pretty game thanks for the video...
ps ok beware topschachde they totally rip you of and then lie to you!!!
vorsicht vor topschach das sind voll die abzocker und lügner.....
derschachfreund 1 year ago
A lot of games like this from the earlier days of chess (pre-1900 or so) are not actual "games", but rather they are "explorations" by two players into quick checkmates or sharp positions that they wouldn't have played under normal competitive circumstances. Still fun to watch and informative, IMO. Besides, I couldn't tell you 100% for sure that this game was "fabricated", just that it was a common thing to do back then.
njstuckey 1 year ago
yes, anderssen was particulary strong i don't get it
Migue261 1 year ago
Didn't last long :)
bastiaan0741 1 year ago
@bastiaan0741
Sure didn't. It's the kind of checkmate one usually expects to see a novice suffer at the hands of a seasoned player. Hard to believe a grandmaster suffered it.
adiladil78 1 year ago