Whats the point of setting takeoff thrust and the parking brakes on ? to gain 'surprise' energy from the engines that will push the aircraft all at once instead of the aircraft slowly getting speed as it accelerates from the runway ?
just never seen this being used before in civil aviation and i dont watch videos of military aviation so i dont really know...
@Juppie902 Unlike normal piston pounders, turbines take a little time to get up to their maximum RPM. So they do that to give the engines time to spool up to their desired RPM so that way the aircraft has maximum power during the whole takeoff run instead of chewing up 15% of the takeoff run while the engines to spool up.
Good old FRED... for those who dont know what FRED stands for its: F**king Ridiculous Economic Disaster. Reliable plane when she flies, but herself and crews love to break down at paradise places. Great video by the way.
I keep watching all of these C-5 vids and it seems like no one actually films the unique gear retraction process. I don't get it. Cool video anyway I guess. Seems like the pilot held the brakes until the engines spooled up to full-power, hence the shorter takeoff.
@jiyouuu well i'll answer this. Those are flaps at the trailing edge. Slots/slats are only on the leading edge, which lower the angle of attack when deployed, resulting in a minimized take off distance (and other near stall configurations). You can see the slots/slats on this aircrafts leading edge. The difference between a slot and slat is the ability to retract it. (slots are permanently in place, and slats aren't). NOW YOU KNOW!
@Freiheitadler WRONG. Slats increase CAMBER, which increases LIFT AND DRAG. Slots make the airflow stick to the wings surface even at higher angles of attack. Both reduce the stall speed. Learn something fool.
@superskullmaster K...how was I wrong? I didn't go into detail on how they do what they do because the guy asking the question didn't seem to know too much. But if we are going to be tools about it, slots and slats don't make airflow stick to the wing at high angles of attack. That is the job of vortex generators because vortices stick better than laminar flows. Slots and slats re-energize the airflow as well as decrease the velocity of the airflow below the wing, increasing lift.
@Freiheitadler Reread what I wrote. I said slats increase the camber. I didn't say slots did. Slots bring high pressure air from under the wing and direct it over the top. Faster moving air hugs the wing better. Vortex generators increase the vortices on top of the wing which causes the air thats already on top the the wing to adhere better. Checkmate.
@Freiheitadler Whoa I'm getting confused now. If we are talking about the same kind of slots I am more or lessing talking about slats the have a rather large gap between the flat T/E and the wing L/E. So if does the same job as slats but the area where it makes the most difference is bringing that high pressure air over the top of the wing(though when you think about it why is that a good thing?).
@superskullmaster Yea slots and slats are the exact same things, except slats can be retracted for reduced drag at cruise. Not many planes roll with slots because its so inefficient at cruise. And yes, both have a gap when extended as far as I understand.
Energizing the airflow is good because it happens at angles of attack where the airflow would normally eddie off the top of the wing. Thus increasing stall angle.
@Diodorus79 They were designed that way so the loading floor would be uninterrupted. The aircraft needed that many tires to have a "light footprint" when heavily loaded, so they engineered them to rotate and stow away on the side of the aircraft. In addition to saving space they also use them to tightly turn the plane when on ground by counter-rotating them from the front gear. Clever engineering considering the C5 was designed in the mid 60s.
You see the size of the plane and then how small the engines are and start to almost wonder: will this thing really take off? And when it does, it's awesome.
Nice vid. What would the AA be without the Galaxy? It's been there every year as long as I can remember. Every time I've walked through it and around it, It still amazes me something that big and heavy can fly. :-)
I remember back in the 70s, some commercial flights took off like that and you see videos of Tu-134s and IL-62s doing that even today - rev up the engine first, then release the brakes.
@lbreflections If for example, the plane is heavy, and the engines arn't the most powerful ones, you would apply the brakes and rev up the engines, so that you dont have to wait for the engines to go up to full power after your rolling, and are already at full power. But however, a Boeing 747-400, can only stay in the same spot at full power for 20seconds, not like it would need to but just an example! Hope this helps my friend! :D
Ahh the sound of gravity screaming in protest
yamahonkawazuki 19 hours ago
looks like antonov an225 in small
DheFilms 22 hours ago
screaming is right, what a behemoth! I could feel the brakes straining to hold the bird back back at throttle up.
ScottLeaf 1 day ago
fighters and helicopters are cool, but these big fat mommas are plane porn for the eyes and ears, big is best lol
DavePhillips671 5 days ago
Amazing video!
jetwind72 6 days ago
Flying hippo!
strela1 6 days ago
That bird is from KSUU (Travis)..Here in Northern Cali.
motokid032 1 week ago
Comment removed
motokid032 1 week ago
Whats the point of setting takeoff thrust and the parking brakes on ? to gain 'surprise' energy from the engines that will push the aircraft all at once instead of the aircraft slowly getting speed as it accelerates from the runway ?
just never seen this being used before in civil aviation and i dont watch videos of military aviation so i dont really know...
Juppie902 1 week ago
@Juppie902 Unlike normal piston pounders, turbines take a little time to get up to their maximum RPM. So they do that to give the engines time to spool up to their desired RPM so that way the aircraft has maximum power during the whole takeoff run instead of chewing up 15% of the takeoff run while the engines to spool up.
jrd1461 1 week ago
el sonido de estos motores simplemente no tiene comparacion
leavemealone0801 2 weeks ago
23" from stop to airborne nice
walkandlookup 2 weeks ago
Nothing else sounds like a C-5 Galaxy! You can hear it thousands of yards in the distance and always know that it is a C-5.
ne14mxx 3 weeks ago
C-5 hub is in MEMPHIS,TN!!!!!!! SO PROUD!!!!!!
steveramirez15 3 weeks ago
The Rev-Up of the C-5's Engines were music to my Ears . Love the sound. Great Vid. you are so lucky to be that close
wdwron08 1 month ago
0.26 Understeer! Fantastic video!
milnei1 1 month ago
Good old FRED... for those who dont know what FRED stands for its: F**king Ridiculous Economic Disaster. Reliable plane when she flies, but herself and crews love to break down at paradise places. Great video by the way.
Dwelve27 1 month ago
woshka oh my I love those engines reving up
chrisabrahams7 1 month ago
Let's hope the pilot does not pick his feet in Phoughkeepsie.
morval99 1 month ago
You should hear it from the inside, it gives you goosebumps I had 23 different flights while in the Marines.
dgl1962 1 month ago
That really is the coolest freaking sound in the world.
hiimbrady 1 month ago
@hiimbrady pure MUSIC!
walkandlookup 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
KeiYuuki2011 1 month ago
Now thats a Take Off!!!!
KeiYuuki2011 1 month ago
you'd be dead standing behind that LOL.
NintendoSonic101 1 month ago
Sounds almost like a Russian jet.
pilotnicco 2 months ago
Holy Christ! I nearly wet myself hearing the sound of the engines spooling up. Hollllly crap. I love jet noise!!! :-D
malestock 3 months ago
the plane must be light.. It will take much more runway to take off if it is fully loaded.. Amazing plane though!
irvinmanohar 3 months ago
@irvinmanohar Actually, only about another 3,000 feet or so at full capacity :)
technocrash09 2 days ago
When I went to Dayton Ohio to see the the airshow and I walked up to this thing the wheel is taller than me and Im 5.1 cause Im 11
bobelayer 3 months ago
To me, there's no better sound in the world like a jet engine transitioning from idle to full throttle like at 0:46. Its like the symphony ochestra!!
aliyum 3 months ago
A fab box. Cheers!
clusterguard 3 months ago
I keep watching all of these C-5 vids and it seems like no one actually films the unique gear retraction process. I don't get it. Cool video anyway I guess. Seems like the pilot held the brakes until the engines spooled up to full-power, hence the shorter takeoff.
Neno8403 3 months ago
is that lift augmentation device (slot) at the trailing edge?
jiyouuu 3 months ago
@jiyouuu well i'll answer this. Those are flaps at the trailing edge. Slots/slats are only on the leading edge, which lower the angle of attack when deployed, resulting in a minimized take off distance (and other near stall configurations). You can see the slots/slats on this aircrafts leading edge. The difference between a slot and slat is the ability to retract it. (slots are permanently in place, and slats aren't). NOW YOU KNOW!
Freiheitadler 2 months ago
@Freiheitadler WRONG. Slats increase CAMBER, which increases LIFT AND DRAG. Slots make the airflow stick to the wings surface even at higher angles of attack. Both reduce the stall speed. Learn something fool.
superskullmaster 1 month ago
@superskullmaster K...how was I wrong? I didn't go into detail on how they do what they do because the guy asking the question didn't seem to know too much. But if we are going to be tools about it, slots and slats don't make airflow stick to the wing at high angles of attack. That is the job of vortex generators because vortices stick better than laminar flows. Slots and slats re-energize the airflow as well as decrease the velocity of the airflow below the wing, increasing lift.
Freiheitadler 1 month ago
@Freiheitadler Reread what I wrote. I said slats increase the camber. I didn't say slots did. Slots bring high pressure air from under the wing and direct it over the top. Faster moving air hugs the wing better. Vortex generators increase the vortices on top of the wing which causes the air thats already on top the the wing to adhere better. Checkmate.
superskullmaster 1 month ago
@superskullmaster slots do increase camber too. Are they not the exact same thing with the exception of the ability to retract?
Freiheitadler 1 month ago
@Freiheitadler Whoa I'm getting confused now. If we are talking about the same kind of slots I am more or lessing talking about slats the have a rather large gap between the flat T/E and the wing L/E. So if does the same job as slats but the area where it makes the most difference is bringing that high pressure air over the top of the wing(though when you think about it why is that a good thing?).
superskullmaster 1 month ago
@superskullmaster Yea slots and slats are the exact same things, except slats can be retracted for reduced drag at cruise. Not many planes roll with slots because its so inefficient at cruise. And yes, both have a gap when extended as far as I understand.
Energizing the airflow is good because it happens at angles of attack where the airflow would normally eddie off the top of the wing. Thus increasing stall angle.
Freiheitadler 1 month ago
And when it does fly over when hes landing he goes slow and then powers up and its loud.
bobelayer 3 months ago
Hey guys guess what this plane flys over my house and lands at KGSO in NC cause the airport has a contract with the air force.
bobelayer 3 months ago
Man, awesome sound! Love it!. The rear wheels has a strange set-up
Diodorus79 3 months ago
@Diodorus79 They were designed that way so the loading floor would be uninterrupted. The aircraft needed that many tires to have a "light footprint" when heavily loaded, so they engineered them to rotate and stow away on the side of the aircraft. In addition to saving space they also use them to tightly turn the plane when on ground by counter-rotating them from the front gear. Clever engineering considering the C5 was designed in the mid 60s.
QueBeta75 3 months ago
@QueBeta75 Holy cow! very clever indeed!
Diodorus79 3 months ago
You see the size of the plane and then how small the engines are and start to almost wonder: will this thing really take off? And when it does, it's awesome.
operazanotaijin 3 months ago
a great piece of American engineering
devastationz12349 3 months ago
amazing plane, got into the cargo bay a couple of years ago and it's massive
yoyoyoyoshua 4 months ago
These are General Electric CF-39s the only birds to use them. to use
acesofspaces100 4 months ago
@acesofspaces100 TF39s.................not CF39s *TF stands for turbo fan* :)
technocrash09 2 days ago
fairy flight
jonahair747 4 months ago
I take it he was holding the brake till he powered up. How does the brake take that kinda strain?
SteveWard3928 4 months ago
man you gotta love the sound of the cf6 ...
sagasa456 4 months ago
Boy! It didn't take long for it to get off the ground! Fine video!
kenpalmer1965 4 months ago
That was excellent on full screen.
mikeycbd 4 months ago
Gotta love the sound of a c5 galaxy powering up for take off
Afterburner47 4 months ago
Very nice , Well done
Congratulations Michael from Israel
mishazeltser1 5 months ago
@mishazeltser1 thanks for watching
delpillar 5 months ago
Nice vid. What would the AA be without the Galaxy? It's been there every year as long as I can remember. Every time I've walked through it and around it, It still amazes me something that big and heavy can fly. :-)
blueshark2010 5 months ago
You can clearly see how the elevator moves and take control of the pitch!
b747a380an225 6 months ago
nice, im 1400th viewer!
skillerboy3 6 months ago
Awesome video and a mighty plane. Thanks for sharing. :)
Flightspotting 6 months ago
Whoaaaaaaaah! SCREAAAAAAAAAM!
SenenGarciaLlanes 6 months ago
Fantastic fantastic videographed.
Valkenier11 6 months ago
easy there big guy.
don't want to pull a hamstring now, do we?!
CefiroGuy3 6 months ago
Beautiful!
BEM5823 6 months ago
What a monster! Great editing, amazing filming - really brings out the power of this bird!
blueb0g 6 months ago
@blueb0g thanks
delpillar 6 months ago
i would like to see a C-5 taking off like this at st.maarten airport! :P
Adelgary777 6 months ago
Quick takeoff!!!
It`s like watching a fat guy win a 1000m dash
TheAsianDude828 6 months ago 23
@TheAsianDude828 empty ! I'd like to see with tons of cargo...
tonfra 1 week ago
Did he have the brake set right before takeoff?
taylor1hp 6 months ago
@taylor1hp Yes they have to do that in order to takeoff!
dskxalive 6 months ago
@dskxalive
I remember back in the 70s, some commercial flights took off like that and you see videos of Tu-134s and IL-62s doing that even today - rev up the engine first, then release the brakes.
Is this to maximise take-off run?
lbreflections 4 months ago
@lbreflections If for example, the plane is heavy, and the engines arn't the most powerful ones, you would apply the brakes and rev up the engines, so that you dont have to wait for the engines to go up to full power after your rolling, and are already at full power. But however, a Boeing 747-400, can only stay in the same spot at full power for 20seconds, not like it would need to but just an example! Hope this helps my friend! :D
dskxalive 4 months ago
@dskxalive
Got it, cheers!! ;)
lbreflections 4 months ago
@lbreflections No, it's to minimize it.
RManBB2010 4 months ago
@dskxalive Only on short take-offs. Longer runways, not necessary *I have about 1000hrs on them* :)
Many times, we rolled off the taxiway and just kept rolling. Absolute joy riding on one.....especially in the cockpit!
technocrash09 2 days ago
this makes my speakers shake...
AviationHD1 6 months ago
watch 0:26 , the nose wheel is skidding during the turn.
nav3103 6 months ago
I hear maria ozawa squealing ^_^
fransarj 6 months ago
AMAZING, gotta love the sound
MTran0708 6 months ago
I'm the 7 th viewer and you can suck it
Thekingswa747 6 months ago
Gawd Damn thats one big bird lol... I like the sound how it powers up the engines and the wing span is awesome
brownhugo 6 months ago 11