I'm not saying UFO's don't exist because...well you're really ignorant to say there's no other forms of life, just based on us, and the amount of total space there is for existence. With that said, the chances being as high as they are for their to be more life, and UFO's. The chance of us EVER having come into contact with them is extremely improbable. I think other life forms exist, and I think UFO's exist. I don't think we've seen them. Don't think we ever will.
Thanks to SICK KNOWLEDGE82 for using good sound reasoning to put moron antidote in his place. I have been giving him a good spanking on a regular basis. He is getting a little dull & unresponsive of late. The idea that ufos might be alive boils his blood .
These are massive but primitive biological organisms expressing themselves in a form of living plasma. Most if not all UFO video showing spaceships are fake. The vast majority of all UFO video evidence shows what looks like glowing plasma blobs. It is so blatantly obvious that these are some form of life. How can humanity be so evasive of reality?
there is some weird stuff going on . common sense, Now you have all these egg heads telling laymen such as myself about reflections and gas, Sooner or later the truth will emerge, the universe is so vast there has to be other life,
@OU8121ST Truths never "emerge"....they have to be ferreted out.Vastness is not the issue..higher vibratory rate is. NASA knows well what we are looking at here. These are somewhat primitive biological organisms manifesting in a form of living plasma. They are native to our upper atmosphere and beyond.Normally invisible to our eyesight, they were first discovered and captured on infrared film by brilliant pioneering researcher Trevor Constable in the mid 1950, Read"The Cosmic Pulse of Life"
Well, this sure is a very compelling video! Obvious UFO's. I just wonder why they would go through all those manuvers and not actually come closer or communicate more clearly via electronic or other medium. I am no expert. It almost looks like an invitation of some sort. The more I think about it, the more astounding it is. Curiouser and curiouser.
oh i also forgot there were military flares that were seen in ths video - large military flares with parachutes - and i heard there were chinese lanterns thats were lanuched at the time this was video shot - the remainings orbs ar ejust ice crystals - this is nothing - stars - lights reflections of lights - ice crystals and chinese lanterns - ufos dont exist.
obviously just swamp gas with the moons reflection and light from the planet venus also some light from some stars in the background thats flickering on and off and some light reflecting from the ground which is also reflecting off of a plane and you see the planes lights as well lighting up - its nothing at all - ufos dont exist.
@303MileHigh420 UFO's don't exist? Unidentified Flying Objects? No such thing? Do you honestly, seriously believe, that EVERY flying thing out there is identified? Think about what you're saying.
UFO and mind reading technology was created by the nazis at the end of the war with No alien help.
there is a criminal orgonization working within high ranks in the military that is aiming to controll people by waging psychological warefare pretending to be spiritual aliens,
UH I know everyones focused on the small light emitting ufos in this vid that end up making a formation....but.....what the FUCK is that giant thing that just flashes by in the beginning of the video?!? The hell was that? Its almost like a mini planet or some shit but everytime right when the recording starts theres a HUGE orb that goes right across the atmosphere did they even mention that in this doc? I
If you spent good money on a trip to Hawaii for example and you had a camera that shot footage as bad as the stuff NASA releases wouldn't you buy a new camera? Yes you would. These are in poor condition for the same reason fakes are...to hide the truth. People who fake ufos videos hide that fact by using blury, grainy, shakey cam techniques. NASA is doing the same thing but the reverse to hide the truth.
Heres my theory behind the actions of the "ufo.s " could it be a sighn of them makeing a circle indecating our planet and that last one ackting like a meteor or perhaps planet "x" hiting our planet and thats when the rest of them light up.....??????
Crap floating around the shuttle. The things appearing 'from behind the shuttle' are out of focus because they're nearby and the camera is set at its infinity focus. The donut shape comes from the lens system used called 'Maksutov'. There's an aluminized portion in the center of the objective lens which has the effect of giving out of focus point or near point sources a donut like appearance. Finally the sudden brightening is when the object emerges from the shadow of the Shuttle into sunlight.
Perhaps they are not UFOs in the 'craft' sense but some as yet undocumented high-living bio-luminescent organism of 'space plankton', for want of a better phrase?
The most convincing evidence I have seen of UFOs is the footage from NASA showing objects in a complete vacuum changing direction independent of the camera platform which is impossible in space unless you have some form of propulsion. There are the dozens of documented surgeries by Dr. Leir removing implants from so called abductees, devices made of alloys we cannot reproduce and emitting radio frequencies. People forget that humans can only see in a miniscule fraction of the light spectrum.
@MoronAntidote Im not referring to sightings within atmospheric conditions, I'm referring to NASA space tether in 0 gravity environments where objects change direction independent of the camera platform. Astronauts, Cosmonauts, and pilots have all reported the same type of anomalous craft with impossible flight characteristics. A "silly conclusion" would be to deny the mountain of evidence that intelligently controlled aircraft have been visiting Earth for thousands of years.
The NASA videos you refer to are in atmospheric conditions, but they are not in zero g conditions. You don't understand what atmosphere means, and you don't understand what zero g means. The atmosphere extends far beyond shuttle orbital altitudes (not a vacuum), and if you you think there is no gravity at shuttle orbital altitudes, then you need to ask yourself why the moon orbits the earth. Your knowledge is so poor i fear there's no point explaining to be honest.
@MoronAntidot True, everything in our solar system is subjected to gravity, yet there are videos showing objects changing 3 separate trajectories in space; admit propulsion is needed. Radar operators by the thousands tracking vehicles moving thousands of miles per hour "in atmosphere" if you truly believe we're the only species collectively inhabiting the Universe you're a fool. I base my research off statistics over time periods, UFOs have been reported before your mom shoulda swallowed you.
Firstly, stop with the assumptions - i actually believe that life exists throughout the universe, but your so-called 'statistical research' does not provide any evidence at all.
What does '3 separate trajectories in space' mean exactly? All the supposedly controversial NASA videos show objects obeying the laws of orbital mechanics - the problem is that few people (this includes you) understand orbital mechanics, and most can't even think in relative terms in 3 dimensions.
@MoronAntidote Ha, you're telling me to stop with the assumptions, meanwhile your entire argument is based off assumptions about me and what I do and don't know, hypocritical don't you think? Oh ya, throw in a few analogies about lemmings and what not; wow brilliant... How many missions and studies have you done at over 50,000 feet? Not including reading theories and other peoples ideas.. actual study. Your orbital mechanics knowledge is not prophetic or on the level either.
No assumptions necessary - you clearly lack the knowledge to interpret the videos presented to you. This is self-evident from your posts.
What do studies at over 50,000 feet have to do with anything? Man has visited the moon on several occasions. If you think this could have been achieved without understanding orbital mechanics, then you're an idiot. Are the countless satellites in stable orbits about earth only there because of luck and guesswork?
@MoronAntidote Nothing is "self-evident" by posts except that your opinion on unidentified objects differs from mine and that your arrogance leads you to believe you know more on the subject than everyone else. Unless you're a trained pilot who regularly travels to the aforementioned altitudes, then your opinion on the objects in question is worth a grain of salt. I never tried to dispute whether man has been to the moon or if science had a lack of understanding on orbital mechanics.
How about the fact that you base your arguments on the false belief that the ionosphere is a vacuum at shuttle orbital altitudes? Anyone can research the ionosphere, and anyone can access MSIS data. You chose not to, but instead shot your mouth off based on bogus asumptions. Therefore, it is self-evident that you have not sufficiently researched the subject, and have the arrogance to state unqualified opinion as evidence. Want more examples?
@MoronAntidote I base like .01% of my argument on ionosphere.. "Anyone can research the ionosphere", how many times have you actually been there? Few people have actually reached those altitudes for extended periods. AN UNDENIABLE percentage of those who have say there is definitely am alien presence. This type of technology has been reported since before the ancient stone architects and sumerian texts. Mainstream science makes up horse shit to explain pyramids and the universal architecture.
The fact that you choose to base .01% of your argument on something which is 100% relevant is your achilles heel.
The scientific world is in agreement concerning the ionosphere. It isn't even necessary to enter it, in order to analyse it. You haven't been there, so how can you argue with others who haven't anyway? The fact is, we know about the ionosphere - deal with it. You are neither rational nor knowledgable it seems.
Another point, is your assumption that pilots are trained to spot UFOs. This is simply not true, and research studies suggest that pilots are actually more prone to error BECAUSE of their training. You should read up on this before making assumptions - it's fascinating stuff.
@MoronAntidote Another non-point is that I don't assume pilots are trained to spot UFOs. I know aviators are trained to identify other aircraft makes, manufacturers and capabilities.. You assume what I know and am thinking, and the word is "assumption" by the way.. "Pilots are more prone to error".. Give me a break dude seriously, that's like saying those who are trained to use microscopes are the least qualified to use them or identify what they are seeing. Its blatant disregard to science.
Read the studies. It doesn't take a genius to realise that people who are trained to be elite in a narrow field can become narrow minded. It's not blatant disregard to science on my part, it's blatant disregard to psychology on your part.
Do yourself a favour and research before you argue. Until then, you're wasting everyone's time.
@MoronAntidote You're gonna argue that psychology plays a major part in vehicle identification for pilots? "Narrow field narrow minded?" What exactly is a "narrow field" and if you wanna argue psychology, then wouldn't a pilot with thousands of flight hours who is exposed to conventional aircraft day in and day out repetitiously be more likely to classify UFOs as something they've seen before when the exact opposite is happening? Your argument is diluted with little psychology backing.
@Moronantidote You're a buffoon, "all you do is read recycled crap" another generic retard phrase with little to no meaning.. I listen to NASA transmissions and read data of objects classified as "unidentified" beyond SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION. Direct quote from Discovery astronaut STS-29, Houston: "We still have the ALIEN SPACECRAFT under observance". "UFO zealots hijacking NASA footage of well understood phenomenon???" WTF are you living under a rock, NASA has a TON of unexplained SHIT on record.
But no statistics prove your point. That's fiction.
My physics, NASA's physics, and every physicist's physics explain what is seen in NASA videos. The fact that you don't understand physics, and won't even acknowledge the conditions which give rise to its explanations, means nothing. Physics is not subject to the opinions of laymen on YouTube :)
You assume 'vehicles' without understanding physics, and present this as evidence for not requiring physics! Circular?
@MoronAntidote Physics is subject to everything, there are topics physics still can't explain. You follow it like it could do you no wrong or never lead you to a false assumption. Stop being an arrogant ass wipe and admit you have never been to outer space and many of those who have and those who have spent time in the "ionosphere" that you love to bring up so much report UFOs. The physical evidence is in the implants Leir and surgeons like him have removed from patients no explanation.
Whenever someone like you points out (correctly) that science can't explain everything, i'm always struck by the irony of the statement. Science is never satisfied and constantly challenges itself to delve deeper, sometimes rewriting itself. However, you people don't even understand current science, yet have the audacity to say you know better, stating wild fantasy as the fact. Science does understand orbital mechanics well enough to explain this. Hard evidence of implants?
@MoronAntidote Struck by the irony? Ya people say current scientifically accepted theories cant explain 100% of the phenomenon happening around the world. This shouldn't strike you as odd, main stream accepted science once said traveling over 60 mph would kill a man, then main stream said it was impossible to break the sound barrier, they said a rocket leaving the atmosphere was impossible, they said a moon mission was impossible. At one point in time this was accepted by MOST of the community.
Well thankyou for proving my point about science. So what's your point? Is your point that science should rewrite itself just because some ignorant fool on youtube gives an opinion? Well it doesn't and won't, ever, because ignorant fools on youtube aren't scientists, no matter how convinced they are that their interpretations of footage (made possible by real scientists) are factual. Our understanding progresses in spite of you, and rightly so. You have nothing to offer.
@MoronAntidote Loosen that knotted tissue between your eyes.Take a big breath and admit that there are no out of focus ice crystals here. I thought I spanked you enough over the past few months to make you run home to mommy. This subject is WAY over your head and you know it. We are looking at LIVING organisms. They are NEW to science. Your stone cold dead orbital mechanics does not apply here.Go track a dead satellite in decaying orbit and do the math...you are like a bull in a china shop.
Done that, unlike you. Simulation was close to NASA's predictions, which could only be roughly estimated due to the unusual aerodymanic properties of the tether/satellite, and wild variation in ionospheric density. You're incapable of modelling or even understanding any of this., so stop pretending.
@MoronAntidote Hey ding-dong this video has nothing to do with the tether video...are you on drugs or something? Keep your comments related to the video we are logged on to. I am beginning to think you are some kind of a robot debunker. "must use some scientific words...predicitions...aerodynamic...properties...ionospheric...modelling " Your mental mercury turned into concrete long ago. Biological plasma ufos like the ones seen here are a scientific reality like all unfaked ufo videos. LOVE N.
@MoronAntidote You use the term "you people" as if you're in the know and have some supreme knowledge. Your arrogance in thinking you're on the cutting edge of science (a general term) leads you to not take into account UFO data collection. You ignore it based of theories you read in a book that someone wrote not you, you disclaim NASA and Russian Cosmonauts on their sightings and the thousands of hours of aerial research done by thousands of members of the scientific community.
@MoronAntidote Again why should we believe your credentials over that of NASA and Russian astronauts? Military pilots, radar operators, astronomers who have claimed what they saw. What have you done to deserve the end all say all? I quote "Alien craft is still under observance" STS missions. "Wild fantasy" try collected data through all time periods all nations and all ethnic groups over thousands of years. Your current scientific beliefs wont let you accept the idea that you may not know it all
You need a lesson in self awareness. You seem to think you can pick and choose whose evidence carries the most weight based on your personal bias. You're talking about a handful of people versus thousands, some of whom are known to have questionable motives/sanity, including certain ex-NASA employees. Interesting how a NASA employee becomes a reliable source when he 'allegedly' agrees with you. The 'observance' event is a well-known ham-radio fake. Read up on that please.
@MoronAntidote Lol you need a lesson in self awareness, yet again you pretend to be some upper echelon science guru... Until you provide name, credentials, and current scientific projects you're working on related to this subject, you're just another "Ignorant opinionated Youtube blogger" with the relevancy of a grain of salt like everyone else. Get off your high horse, you're no more a part of the scientific community than any of the rest of us scholars studying OTHER scientists theories.
@MoronAntidote You obviously haven't progressed that far considering you keep coming back this conversation when nobody has replied to you in weeks. You have nothing to offer besides being a blogger attempting to impersonate an all knowing scientist on optical images captured by agencies you were in no way part of, then you attempt to dictate that real Astronauts, Pilots, Radar operators and Cosmonauts who have witnessed these phenomenon had alternative motives or psychiatric problems. Ur a joke
You attempt to sum all of the statistically improbable events that have been reported by sources within the scientific community as unreal based on your biased opinion then accuse everyone else of being biased. You say UFO visitation hasn't occurred, then why have governments around the world been covertly researching the topic since Foo Fighters in WW2? Why was Project Blue Book extensively conducted and 98% of the findings remain classified to all those without Cosmic Top Secret Clearance?
@MoronAntidote I've done the research, you obviously haven't. Look up UFOs in history, and they continue today and are seen by all races, creeds, and professions. Statistically for all these people since the beginning of recorded history till now all telling such similar stories it would have to be a worldwide conspiracy and to what gain? To be ridiculed by your peers for claiming to see these objects? Getting fired from your aviation job, yet people are still coming forward why??
No you haven't done the research. All you've done is read recycled crap on websites that support your point of view. That's not research.
I'm not concerned with the general UFO thing. I actually believe life exists throughout the universe, but i haven't seen any convincing evidence that we've been visited so far.
What i do object to, is UFO zealots hijacking every piece of NASA footage showing mundane footage of well understood phenomena, as evidence for their dogma.
@MoronAntidote Yes I have done the research and the statistics of reported events by qualified personnel is beyond mere coincidence, even stupid people can identify that. "Your physics, NASA's physics, physicists physics" What the fuck are you writing about? You never contributed to any of the theories or submitted laws that have to do with our main stream accepted physics ideologies, we all follow laws created by Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Tesla, etc, etc.. LOL "Your physics"... blasphemy
@MoronAntidote My argument is that the phenomenon is real and the vehicles are intelligently controlled. I base this on what NASA Apollo astronauts, hundreds of aviators from all realms claiming to see the objects have said and in many cases can be substantiated by trained radar operators on the ground. So the option is to weigh my argument on what thousands expertly trained aviators who have actually spent time in the skies claim to have seen, or one armchair physicist saying impossible. STS 29
@MoronAntidote My argument is that the phenomenon is real and the vehicles are intelligently controlled. I base this on what NASA Apollo astronauts, hundreds of aviators from all realms claiming to see the objects have said and in many cases can be substantiated by trained radar operators on the ground. So the option is to weigh my argument on what thousands expertly trained aviators who have actually spent time in the skies claim to have seen, or one armchair physicist saying impossible. STS 29
@MoronAntidote Can explain how Dr. Leir and other surgeons have recorded and removed implants from patients that consisted of metallic alloys humans are not currently capable of reproducing? The objects being removed from human tissue were covered in the subjects own genetic material, so that the implant would not be considered a foreign object and rejected by the body, again this has been documented and happened decades ago when our science was not up to par with the objects in question.
How about you explain why there is no scientific evidence for your claims? Believing and regurgitating nonsense from some dodgy website on the internet is not evidence. Indiscriminately surfing the internet for confirmation of your own beliefs does not constitute research, any more than lemmings following eachother over a cliff confirms the leader had a good plan. You're the kind of person who doesn't understand the very concept of evidence. 100th hearsay is enough for you.
@MoronAntidote@SickKnowledge82 Bah, your attempts are to dismiss act condescending and all knowing similar to those in the past who fail to question thinking you're aware the cutting edge on all topics... Fact of the matter, you can act like you possess the end all say all you discredit People were selected to pilot aircraft, enter space and they have all reported these objects. Regardless of what insults you have, you know what I say is true. They aren't "dodgy websites" Statistical science...
Shuttles cannot reach altitudes where a complete vacuum exists.
So, we have drag. Relative motion between objects with different mass and drag coefficient produces the very trajectories shown in this video. The shuttle is massive compared to the particles, which is why they all appear to decelerate and fall towards earth faster than the shuttle. All the objects make a single turn and obey orbital mechanics. Jog on.
The question was "If there are aliens then why don't they let themselves be known?" IMO we are an experiment, the best experiments are done without anyone but the administer knowing it is an experiment.
@queenshussars sorry to say that your just not doing homework,For 1,Most Alien issues are at Dulce ,area s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 ---There are many ways you can get the evidence.On youtube there is a film just google this
Shuttle 12 km tether snapped satellite anomalies and see something interesting,The craft NASA saw worked out to be 2.5 Nautical mile wide,The multitude of craft swarming the tether are countless,and appear then disappear? NASA is investigating,the camera on tether was to film them.
Give me a break, some lights flashing over a picture of earth and all of a sudden the UFO phenomenon is solved. Star Trek and Star Wars videos look better and more convincing. Billions of years in existence and not one hard piece of evidence of a living being outside of earth. You'll see Jesus and Muhammad before you see an Alien.
@facepalmsociety15 What I said is a true statement that is proved everyday. You are the ass because you can't bring forth one proof of an UFO other than some lights bouncing around in space for what? Are they gathering resources or what? As I said billions of years in existence and not shred of evidence. Supposedly these people are advanced enough to have been traveling here when we were on horses and foot. Where was your Area 51's then?
@Abudu1956 not a shred of proof? there is evidence, albeit not enough to be conclusive but to say that you have a better chance of meeting jesus than an alien is just fucking retarded.
i don't necessarily believe that this is alien contact but i'm not going to say it is or isn't.
@facepalmsociety15 Why is it necessary to use profanity when I didn't address u that way? My adolescent sons don't need to see u act unintelligent. Jesus has supposedly been here before and has promised to return. Your alien hasn't been seen nor promised to be seen or return. Which is one is really retarded? That that has been seen before or that that has never been seen and won't? Besides that more people believe Jesus existed and will return than people believe aliens ever existed period.
@Abudu1956 dear Sbudu,Please don,t take my user name tomean siimilar,I can,t go into detail,s unfortunately,there not little green men at all,they are for the childish,Un-human life and that of which is not of this Earth is a reality,I am sorry to ruin your religious day,If you trace back to the fallen angels,Andeluvian race,written of in the bible,and follow the chase with wikaoedia & youtube giant skeletons found Learn.God made all.He hoped small minds were not in the equation
@Mr7777ELVIS If you venture elsewhere on the Internet to sites such Urban Legends, Hoax Slayer and others you would seen that the giant skeleton stories are hoaxes. Also, I can give websites all day showing untruths and contradictions in the Bible. You'll also find much of the Old Testament in the Book of the Dead, which predates the Old Testament by 1,500 years. You'll also find where Moses narrates his own burial; go figure that out. In other words you ain't saying nothing important.
@facepalmsociety15 It is highly more retarded to expect something that has never been seen but talked about for trillions of years than it is to expect something there is some kind of record or evidence of. More mentally unbalanced people see little green men than they do Jesus.
@Abudu1956 last time i checked a ufo enthusiast has never flown a plane into a building. seems like the religious people are the more mentally unbalanced ones.
trillions of years? the universe is only 14 billion years old.
there is definitely life outside of earth and i don't think its that far of a stretch that they may have made contact with us once or twice in some form or fashion.
@facepalmsociety15 You have no idea what kind of enthusiasm whoever it was that committed 911 had for UFO's or anything else, just like you have no idea how old the universe is. U're relying on scientific data, which changes with every new discovery. It was scientist who sad the earth was flat and that phrenology was true. It's an eternal stretch when you can't prove it even with "one" shred of evidence. No one has ever shown us an alien; especially not an intelligent one.
@facepalmsociety15 The Andaluvian Race bloodline is in the human race,the giants of old,s skeleton,s are being excavated around the world.They were the fallen angels from the bible.You would have a much better chance of passing them in the street more than you would ever know.Our techy things did not really come from Jesus.
The Ancient Super Powers were there before Jesus,The Aliens are written of in the Bible & is not your bible the truth.God would not lie WOULD HE.Have faith God knows all.
@facepalmsociety15 The answer is because the average person would kill them if they were shown and left to mingle,they would be crucified or stabbed like Christ was.Yes sadly the human race is like that,We come in Peace Shoot to Kill.that is why we offer them protection.They are only named Alien because they have not been availed to you and declared.We call it plausible Deniability.They were always here.minders like us know that you are not ready You most dont like your President Think
It astounds me that people are so adamant to believe that there is no other intelligent life in our infinite universe except our human race. Our galaxy alone is a mere atom sized speck on the galactic map of the universe(s). To deny that other life is existent is mere ignorance. Because they cannot see it; they cannot believe it. You cannot see your God or prove his/her/their existence; yet you believe?
I think it's worth pointing out that people who deny the existence of ET in videos such as this, don't necessarily deny that life exists elsewhere. This is the classic assumption that people make, and much of the time it's completely unfounded. It is entirely acceptable and plausible for someone to deny evidence in every single NASA video to date, yet still believe life exists throughout the universe. Belief of existence doesn't require evidence of visitation. Think on this!
@MrsUfulu We can see the evidence of a Creator. Where is your evidence of an alien or other intelligent life? For those of us who believe in a Creator, not Jesus or some man in flesh or on a cloud but, a Creative Force we know the works of that Creator. Show me one piece of evidence or work created beyond earth by an intelligent being? I'm not saying there is no other life in the universe. I'm saying it's no smarter than us or dumber.
Quote "A piece of rock just a few mm across would rip through the shuttle and cause a fatal accident".
This hasn't happened.
How long has the ISS been in orbit? It hasn't happened!
This is your typical bogus argument from an anti-NASA fuckwit. There is no logical correlation between ice/debris particles generated by space vehicles and meteors. Relative velocity appears to be an alien (ironic) concept to this turd!
dude at 2:40 a nearly perfect circle made up of lights is clearly visible at the center of the frame and then another orb lights up in the dead center. are you blind or just in denial?
It's nothing like perfect, and it's only a transient formation.
The objects are just moving naturally in the wake of the shuttle, and that's that.
What's so special about it? Do the constellations imply intelligence? What's so improbable about a brief, lousy approximation of a circle compared with the probabiity of life on earth, or a circular pattern of leaves caught in the wind?
Strange how we can find far better geometric shapes on earth then, but nobody makes silly claims about them.
At least on earth, such shapes exist for more than a few seconds.
Talk about a 'snap-shot' mentality. Oh look, those bits of crap made a shitty circle for a few seconds, but lets ignore what happened before and after ;) Think?
bcjammer if you have evidence to back it up I would love to see it....keeping in mind NASA has no evidence they are releasing regarding this clip. I wonder why
wtf? you UFO folks are idiots for claiming this vid as proof. I'm not saying there isn't advanced life out there but this vid doesn't show what you guys say it does;
no "dancing" lights no formation no lighting up are you even watching the same vid??? this is crap
oh I love how none scientists with NO space film analyzation experience just KNOW what is on these films. As if you comprehend how solar winds, radiation, an everything else in the NONE-void of space interacts and as if you compr
Aren't we really the aliens? We have only been here a short time but so convinced of our universal power. To another planet we are the ufo's, take it from the hunter herself, oh ya I know stuff.
@marcos71580 You remind me of those people who go, "FUCKING MAGNETS, HOW DO THEY WORK? I DON'T WANT TO TALK TO A SCIENTIST, YA'LL MOTHER FUCKERS LYIN' AND GETTIN' ME PISSED."
In short, you sound like a jackass. Also, all caps doesn't help you look smart. In fact it hurts your argument.
"I see DEAD aliens"... hehe No seriously folks, even at light speed these guys traveled hundreds of years, to get here, just to stare at our lightning storms and probe our butts... they ae SO DEAD when they get back home, for wasting all that money!!
This is maybe a little difficult for some, but since it is a space shuttle video taken by NASA, hence STS-80, it is safe to assume the video was taken while in orbit of the earth. The last I heard the shuttle was not capable of escaping earth orbit.
Has NASA ever actually tried to explain this footage before? Just curious. The objects, whatever they are, seem to be purposefully spaced .. they don't float aimlessly like an ice crystal might. A debris cloud of ice or shuttle fragments would be chaotic, right? This just seems more organized.
@Elentaurel ya funny thing u mention ice crystals cuz thats exactly what they tried to say it was. also the lenses on these cameras are set to "infinity" focus, meaning theres no way that an ice particle can show up, especially not like these
This guy is a complete idiot. Intelligent beings? Hah. They're *all* bits of ice and debris. And no, it's not unsafe for the shuttle or ISS to be there because they came *from* the shuttle, so they move at very low velocity wrt it. It regularly dumps excess water from its fuel cells that *must* freeze into lots of tiny ice crystals -- physics says it must. And they'll be in the same orbit, flashing in the sunrise as shown here, drifting around until they slowly sublimate or drift away.
@astrobant2 man, really. GET A LIFE! Go out, admire a beautiful girl, have kids with her. Look at the stars and then realize how small we are in the universe. If you have all that already, look again man. You are missing most every thing. Good luck.
Hey Beevis and Butthead are alive!! That was Beevis's new space cycle zipping in front of the sky "fartknockers"! Whoa did you see that guys nice suit looks like he got it from Mens Warehouse or Bloomingdales!! Those emerging dots on the screen are "photo shopped in"
Yep. These ARE ice crystals, space junk, and debris. Tiny bits of stuff float around every mission and we can see them when CCD light enhancement is used. Most of this would probably not be visible to the naked eye. The close ones are out of focus and look like translucent orbs.
There are many videos which show this now. If it's some big secret, why do you UFO idiots think they would keep releasing them?
@Astrobrant2 (So) ice crystals glow and have energy around them when they look like there in formation in a circle go back 2 sleep your talking out your ass some people need to stop and think you should not open your mouth just making yourself look worse. ooook.
@budzag Ice crystals and other objects reflect light, and using CCD light-enhancing technology, we're are seeing things much brighter than they would appear to the naked eye. There are many videos now, showing this debris.
The objects which are larger are closer to the window and out of focus. In the tether video, you can see the focus and zoom change and they become dots. UFO fans still think they're huge space ships.
I see NOTHING like a formation, and what "energy" do you think you see?
Nope. That's just a bullshit evaluation on your part. It doesn't need to be argued against because all that nonense about 'glow and energy around them' is just evidence of how little you know about cameras/optics/physics. A rough 'apparent' circle in 3 dimensions is proof of nothing, when virtually perfect circles occur in nature regularly right here on earth. It's just not an argument dude.
@Astrobrant2 lol did you watch the video? Perhaps Buzz Aldrin is an idiot too? Like many of the other astronauts? You're a rather condescending prick to call others idiots because they believe this is a ufo. From imperical observation i would say the "ufo idiots" make a much better case than an ass clown like you
@kayaksta Apparently YOU did not watch what Buzz Aldrin said.
Yes, I watched the video, and I've seen it before. These are small bits of debris, probably mostly ice. They are around all our space missions and show up easily in enhanced photography. Some people will read what I have said, look it up a little further, and say, "Ha! I guess he was right. These really are just bits of debris."
Other people who want to protect their fantasies, no matter what, will call me a "condescending prick."
Why does it have to be a craft. I like to think of the possibility of magnetic jelly fish, living off the magnet field of our planet.... We have just began to scratch the surface.
I like this video if you want to hear some NEW information on a 1940 Alien encounter that was BIGGER than ROSWEL then Check out my NEW vid "The UFO & ALIEN Chronicles" .........MUST SEE VIDEO...
I think it is unlikely that these are Alien space craft.
Although from all the various footage I have seen, NASA missions ufo footage, it does seem to me that there are things outside our atmosphere that appear to be quite happy floating around and doing there thing, In space. There more like organisms than Alien space vessels. It kind of reminds me of Organism which survive and live near scorching hot volcanic outlets at the bottom of the ocean.
thumbs down this video is crap i didnt see anything on there but a refracted light image on the lens of the camera. any highschooler thats getting an A in science could show you whats happening.
I would also like to state that the government lets out authentic information but it also counters it with bogus stories so that we stay in a state of doubt. Our government fears the result of such information to the public at large. When you look at comments made by people on Youtuve you can understand their hesitation of divulging facts about many issues. Some people just could not handle it and others will not believe regardless of the proof. So I can understand their stance on this issue
I would not call these ufo but I would call them extraterrestial life forms of some sort. They could be something on the line of Jellyfish, they could be/are intelligent. Please people it is time we all understand that when you break cells down to their most basic state it still deems that someone must have created it. Just look up a bacterial flagellum. It has gears and sockets and this is a living organism. To think all this just "happened" is akin to hiding your head in the sand.
What people don't understand about Nasa and most of the government is that if they don't want something to be leaked, it won't be leaked. Wikileaks be damned- if the US really, truly wants something to be top secret, it is, and it will be.
Other than that, this is very interesting. I don't believe in UFOs, but this does certainly make you wonder.
I'm not saying UFO's don't exist because...well you're really ignorant to say there's no other forms of life, just based on us, and the amount of total space there is for existence. With that said, the chances being as high as they are for their to be more life, and UFO's. The chance of us EVER having come into contact with them is extremely improbable. I think other life forms exist, and I think UFO's exist. I don't think we've seen them. Don't think we ever will.
Dreadlord67 1 week ago
I want to be abducted by aliens, i need some new friends. and then maby, if im lucky, i get to fly a spaceship.. would be awesome!
BluWolf2012 3 weeks ago
Thanks to SICK KNOWLEDGE82 for using good sound reasoning to put moron antidote in his place. I have been giving him a good spanking on a regular basis. He is getting a little dull & unresponsive of late. The idea that ufos might be alive boils his blood .
nobulax 2 months ago
These are massive but primitive biological organisms expressing themselves in a form of living plasma. Most if not all UFO video showing spaceships are fake. The vast majority of all UFO video evidence shows what looks like glowing plasma blobs. It is so blatantly obvious that these are some form of life. How can humanity be so evasive of reality?
nobulax 2 months ago
You need to buy his other DVD's Christopher Everard - Enigma TV ( :
aadrianlee 2 months ago
i was in that spot when it came down i was like WAT DA F*CK!?!?!?
MrDomoSquad1 2 months ago in playlist AREA 51 - UFO
I'm an alien, trust me!!
rockerneum 2 months ago
there is some weird stuff going on . common sense, Now you have all these egg heads telling laymen such as myself about reflections and gas, Sooner or later the truth will emerge, the universe is so vast there has to be other life,
OU8121ST 2 months ago
@OU8121ST Truths never "emerge"....they have to be ferreted out.Vastness is not the issue..higher vibratory rate is. NASA knows well what we are looking at here. These are somewhat primitive biological organisms manifesting in a form of living plasma. They are native to our upper atmosphere and beyond.Normally invisible to our eyesight, they were first discovered and captured on infrared film by brilliant pioneering researcher Trevor Constable in the mid 1950, Read"The Cosmic Pulse of Life"
nobulax 2 months ago
Well, this sure is a very compelling video! Obvious UFO's. I just wonder why they would go through all those manuvers and not actually come closer or communicate more clearly via electronic or other medium. I am no expert. It almost looks like an invitation of some sort. The more I think about it, the more astounding it is. Curiouser and curiouser.
frankbateau1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
oh i also forgot there were military flares that were seen in ths video - large military flares with parachutes - and i heard there were chinese lanterns thats were lanuched at the time this was video shot - the remainings orbs ar ejust ice crystals - this is nothing - stars - lights reflections of lights - ice crystals and chinese lanterns - ufos dont exist.
303MileHigh420 3 months ago
Comment removed
303MileHigh420 3 months ago
obviously just swamp gas with the moons reflection and light from the planet venus also some light from some stars in the background thats flickering on and off and some light reflecting from the ground which is also reflecting off of a plane and you see the planes lights as well lighting up - its nothing at all - ufos dont exist.
303MileHigh420 3 months ago 5
@303MileHigh420 UFO's don't exist? Unidentified Flying Objects? No such thing? Do you honestly, seriously believe, that EVERY flying thing out there is identified? Think about what you're saying.
TheRadiastral 1 month ago
@TheRadiastral you obviously dont understand sarcasm - idiot.
303MileHigh420 1 month ago
@303MileHigh420 Apparently I don't. Which is no reason to insult. Jerk.
TheRadiastral 1 month ago
@TheRadiastral grow a brain and then you wont get insulted - moron.
303MileHigh420 1 month ago
@TheRadiastral Dumbass moron, learn English, fail at life.
ShadowWorldSniper 1 month ago
@TheRadiastral lol think about what your asking, and who you are asking it of...
Whisper6911 1 month ago
reddit.
stevenmcall 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UFO and mind reading technology was created by the nazis at the end of the war with No alien help.
there is a criminal orgonization working within high ranks in the military that is aiming to controll people by waging psychological warefare pretending to be spiritual aliens,
hope4world3000 3 months ago
UH I know everyones focused on the small light emitting ufos in this vid that end up making a formation....but.....what the FUCK is that giant thing that just flashes by in the beginning of the video?!? The hell was that? Its almost like a mini planet or some shit but everytime right when the recording starts theres a HUGE orb that goes right across the atmosphere did they even mention that in this doc? I
metalahhhhhhhhhhhh 3 months ago
If you spent good money on a trip to Hawaii for example and you had a camera that shot footage as bad as the stuff NASA releases wouldn't you buy a new camera? Yes you would. These are in poor condition for the same reason fakes are...to hide the truth. People who fake ufos videos hide that fact by using blury, grainy, shakey cam techniques. NASA is doing the same thing but the reverse to hide the truth.
zigzagbigbag 3 months ago
you can do it much better in adobe after effects ;)
dezindzer 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Heres my theory behind the actions of the "ufo.s " could it be a sighn of them makeing a circle indecating our planet and that last one ackting like a meteor or perhaps planet "x" hiting our planet and thats when the rest of them light up.....??????
alexerstube 3 months ago
Great.
minimalizam009 3 months ago
aliens don't exist...
PulaRecords 3 months ago
go back to sleep
zenithar6666 3 months ago
looks like the moon has some kind of sphere
Chribyl 3 months ago
it seems to form a star pattern....like we used to draw when we were kids with on orb in the center
Jtaylor2306 3 months ago
Crap floating around the shuttle. The things appearing 'from behind the shuttle' are out of focus because they're nearby and the camera is set at its infinity focus. The donut shape comes from the lens system used called 'Maksutov'. There's an aluminized portion in the center of the objective lens which has the effect of giving out of focus point or near point sources a donut like appearance. Finally the sudden brightening is when the object emerges from the shadow of the Shuttle into sunlight.
executivesteps 4 months ago
they play nice space music..
newislandguitar 4 months ago
Perhaps they are not UFOs in the 'craft' sense but some as yet undocumented high-living bio-luminescent organism of 'space plankton', for want of a better phrase?
jontycampbell 4 months ago
IT'S LUCIFER + COMPANY+THEY'RE NOT COMMING FOR A BEER. MAZ
creations78 4 months ago
hyper.net/ufo/vs/m20-015.html
DrittesAuge1 4 months ago
RUBBISH
1TheTisim 4 months ago
NASER
hunterrat 5 months ago
this guy is really annoying.
gsw999 5 months ago
The most convincing evidence I have seen of UFOs is the footage from NASA showing objects in a complete vacuum changing direction independent of the camera platform which is impossible in space unless you have some form of propulsion. There are the dozens of documented surgeries by Dr. Leir removing implants from so called abductees, devices made of alloys we cannot reproduce and emitting radio frequencies. People forget that humans can only see in a miniscule fraction of the light spectrum.
SickKnowledge82 5 months ago 6
@SickKnowledge82
It would be impossible if it was a complete vacuum.
It isn't a complete vacuum though, and that's the very reason for the behaviour of small particles in these videos.
Look up the MSIS model and make yourself aware of the density of the ionosphere at Shuttle orbital altitudes before you jump to silly conclusions.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote Im not referring to sightings within atmospheric conditions, I'm referring to NASA space tether in 0 gravity environments where objects change direction independent of the camera platform. Astronauts, Cosmonauts, and pilots have all reported the same type of anomalous craft with impossible flight characteristics. A "silly conclusion" would be to deny the mountain of evidence that intelligently controlled aircraft have been visiting Earth for thousands of years.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
The NASA videos you refer to are in atmospheric conditions, but they are not in zero g conditions. You don't understand what atmosphere means, and you don't understand what zero g means. The atmosphere extends far beyond shuttle orbital altitudes (not a vacuum), and if you you think there is no gravity at shuttle orbital altitudes, then you need to ask yourself why the moon orbits the earth. Your knowledge is so poor i fear there's no point explaining to be honest.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidot True, everything in our solar system is subjected to gravity, yet there are videos showing objects changing 3 separate trajectories in space; admit propulsion is needed. Radar operators by the thousands tracking vehicles moving thousands of miles per hour "in atmosphere" if you truly believe we're the only species collectively inhabiting the Universe you're a fool. I base my research off statistics over time periods, UFOs have been reported before your mom shoulda swallowed you.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Firstly, stop with the assumptions - i actually believe that life exists throughout the universe, but your so-called 'statistical research' does not provide any evidence at all.
What does '3 separate trajectories in space' mean exactly? All the supposedly controversial NASA videos show objects obeying the laws of orbital mechanics - the problem is that few people (this includes you) understand orbital mechanics, and most can't even think in relative terms in 3 dimensions.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote Ha, you're telling me to stop with the assumptions, meanwhile your entire argument is based off assumptions about me and what I do and don't know, hypocritical don't you think? Oh ya, throw in a few analogies about lemmings and what not; wow brilliant... How many missions and studies have you done at over 50,000 feet? Not including reading theories and other peoples ideas.. actual study. Your orbital mechanics knowledge is not prophetic or on the level either.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
No assumptions necessary - you clearly lack the knowledge to interpret the videos presented to you. This is self-evident from your posts.
What do studies at over 50,000 feet have to do with anything? Man has visited the moon on several occasions. If you think this could have been achieved without understanding orbital mechanics, then you're an idiot. Are the countless satellites in stable orbits about earth only there because of luck and guesswork?
We know. You don't.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote Nothing is "self-evident" by posts except that your opinion on unidentified objects differs from mine and that your arrogance leads you to believe you know more on the subject than everyone else. Unless you're a trained pilot who regularly travels to the aforementioned altitudes, then your opinion on the objects in question is worth a grain of salt. I never tried to dispute whether man has been to the moon or if science had a lack of understanding on orbital mechanics.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Nothing is self-evident?
How about the fact that you base your arguments on the false belief that the ionosphere is a vacuum at shuttle orbital altitudes? Anyone can research the ionosphere, and anyone can access MSIS data. You chose not to, but instead shot your mouth off based on bogus asumptions. Therefore, it is self-evident that you have not sufficiently researched the subject, and have the arrogance to state unqualified opinion as evidence. Want more examples?
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote I base like .01% of my argument on ionosphere.. "Anyone can research the ionosphere", how many times have you actually been there? Few people have actually reached those altitudes for extended periods. AN UNDENIABLE percentage of those who have say there is definitely am alien presence. This type of technology has been reported since before the ancient stone architects and sumerian texts. Mainstream science makes up horse shit to explain pyramids and the universal architecture.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
Comment removed
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SickKnowledge82
The fact that you choose to base .01% of your argument on something which is 100% relevant is your achilles heel.
The scientific world is in agreement concerning the ionosphere. It isn't even necessary to enter it, in order to analyse it. You haven't been there, so how can you argue with others who haven't anyway? The fact is, we know about the ionosphere - deal with it. You are neither rational nor knowledgable it seems.
The rest of your post is utter nonsense tbh.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Another point, is your assumption that pilots are trained to spot UFOs. This is simply not true, and research studies suggest that pilots are actually more prone to error BECAUSE of their training. You should read up on this before making assumptions - it's fascinating stuff.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote Another non-point is that I don't assume pilots are trained to spot UFOs. I know aviators are trained to identify other aircraft makes, manufacturers and capabilities.. You assume what I know and am thinking, and the word is "assumption" by the way.. "Pilots are more prone to error".. Give me a break dude seriously, that's like saying those who are trained to use microscopes are the least qualified to use them or identify what they are seeing. Its blatant disregard to science.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Read the studies. It doesn't take a genius to realise that people who are trained to be elite in a narrow field can become narrow minded. It's not blatant disregard to science on my part, it's blatant disregard to psychology on your part.
Do yourself a favour and research before you argue. Until then, you're wasting everyone's time.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote You're gonna argue that psychology plays a major part in vehicle identification for pilots? "Narrow field narrow minded?" What exactly is a "narrow field" and if you wanna argue psychology, then wouldn't a pilot with thousands of flight hours who is exposed to conventional aircraft day in and day out repetitiously be more likely to classify UFOs as something they've seen before when the exact opposite is happening? Your argument is diluted with little psychology backing.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Read the studies. I see a lot of supposition and assumption here, but no actual attempt to educate yourself.
Quit stalling and read up.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@Moronantidote You're a buffoon, "all you do is read recycled crap" another generic retard phrase with little to no meaning.. I listen to NASA transmissions and read data of objects classified as "unidentified" beyond SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION. Direct quote from Discovery astronaut STS-29, Houston: "We still have the ALIEN SPACECRAFT under observance". "UFO zealots hijacking NASA footage of well understood phenomenon???" WTF are you living under a rock, NASA has a TON of unexplained SHIT on record.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
Comment removed
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
But no statistics prove your point. That's fiction.
My physics, NASA's physics, and every physicist's physics explain what is seen in NASA videos. The fact that you don't understand physics, and won't even acknowledge the conditions which give rise to its explanations, means nothing. Physics is not subject to the opinions of laymen on YouTube :)
You assume 'vehicles' without understanding physics, and present this as evidence for not requiring physics! Circular?
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote Physics is subject to everything, there are topics physics still can't explain. You follow it like it could do you no wrong or never lead you to a false assumption. Stop being an arrogant ass wipe and admit you have never been to outer space and many of those who have and those who have spent time in the "ionosphere" that you love to bring up so much report UFOs. The physical evidence is in the implants Leir and surgeons like him have removed from patients no explanation.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Whenever someone like you points out (correctly) that science can't explain everything, i'm always struck by the irony of the statement. Science is never satisfied and constantly challenges itself to delve deeper, sometimes rewriting itself. However, you people don't even understand current science, yet have the audacity to say you know better, stating wild fantasy as the fact. Science does understand orbital mechanics well enough to explain this. Hard evidence of implants?
MoronAntidote 3 months ago
@MoronAntidote Struck by the irony? Ya people say current scientifically accepted theories cant explain 100% of the phenomenon happening around the world. This shouldn't strike you as odd, main stream accepted science once said traveling over 60 mph would kill a man, then main stream said it was impossible to break the sound barrier, they said a rocket leaving the atmosphere was impossible, they said a moon mission was impossible. At one point in time this was accepted by MOST of the community.
SickKnowledge82 3 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Well thankyou for proving my point about science. So what's your point? Is your point that science should rewrite itself just because some ignorant fool on youtube gives an opinion? Well it doesn't and won't, ever, because ignorant fools on youtube aren't scientists, no matter how convinced they are that their interpretations of footage (made possible by real scientists) are factual. Our understanding progresses in spite of you, and rightly so. You have nothing to offer.
MoronAntidote 3 months ago
@MoronAntidote Loosen that knotted tissue between your eyes.Take a big breath and admit that there are no out of focus ice crystals here. I thought I spanked you enough over the past few months to make you run home to mommy. This subject is WAY over your head and you know it. We are looking at LIVING organisms. They are NEW to science. Your stone cold dead orbital mechanics does not apply here.Go track a dead satellite in decaying orbit and do the math...you are like a bull in a china shop.
nobulax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nobulax
The truth hurts doesn't it?
MoronAntidote 2 months ago
@nobulax
Done that, unlike you. Simulation was close to NASA's predictions, which could only be roughly estimated due to the unusual aerodymanic properties of the tether/satellite, and wild variation in ionospheric density. You're incapable of modelling or even understanding any of this., so stop pretending.
MoronAntidote 2 months ago
@MoronAntidote Hey ding-dong this video has nothing to do with the tether video...are you on drugs or something? Keep your comments related to the video we are logged on to. I am beginning to think you are some kind of a robot debunker. "must use some scientific words...predicitions...aerodynamic...properties...ionospheric...modelling " Your mental mercury turned into concrete long ago. Biological plasma ufos like the ones seen here are a scientific reality like all unfaked ufo videos. LOVE N.
nobulax 2 months ago
@MoronAntidote You use the term "you people" as if you're in the know and have some supreme knowledge. Your arrogance in thinking you're on the cutting edge of science (a general term) leads you to not take into account UFO data collection. You ignore it based of theories you read in a book that someone wrote not you, you disclaim NASA and Russian Cosmonauts on their sightings and the thousands of hours of aerial research done by thousands of members of the scientific community.
SickKnowledge82 3 months ago
@MoronAntidote Again why should we believe your credentials over that of NASA and Russian astronauts? Military pilots, radar operators, astronomers who have claimed what they saw. What have you done to deserve the end all say all? I quote "Alien craft is still under observance" STS missions. "Wild fantasy" try collected data through all time periods all nations and all ethnic groups over thousands of years. Your current scientific beliefs wont let you accept the idea that you may not know it all
SickKnowledge82 3 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
You need a lesson in self awareness. You seem to think you can pick and choose whose evidence carries the most weight based on your personal bias. You're talking about a handful of people versus thousands, some of whom are known to have questionable motives/sanity, including certain ex-NASA employees. Interesting how a NASA employee becomes a reliable source when he 'allegedly' agrees with you. The 'observance' event is a well-known ham-radio fake. Read up on that please.
MoronAntidote 3 months ago
@MoronAntidote Lol you need a lesson in self awareness, yet again you pretend to be some upper echelon science guru... Until you provide name, credentials, and current scientific projects you're working on related to this subject, you're just another "Ignorant opinionated Youtube blogger" with the relevancy of a grain of salt like everyone else. Get off your high horse, you're no more a part of the scientific community than any of the rest of us scholars studying OTHER scientists theories.
SickKnowledge82 3 months ago
Comment removed
SickKnowledge82 3 months ago
@MoronAntidote You obviously haven't progressed that far considering you keep coming back this conversation when nobody has replied to you in weeks. You have nothing to offer besides being a blogger attempting to impersonate an all knowing scientist on optical images captured by agencies you were in no way part of, then you attempt to dictate that real Astronauts, Pilots, Radar operators and Cosmonauts who have witnessed these phenomenon had alternative motives or psychiatric problems. Ur a joke
SickKnowledge82 3 months ago
You attempt to sum all of the statistically improbable events that have been reported by sources within the scientific community as unreal based on your biased opinion then accuse everyone else of being biased. You say UFO visitation hasn't occurred, then why have governments around the world been covertly researching the topic since Foo Fighters in WW2? Why was Project Blue Book extensively conducted and 98% of the findings remain classified to all those without Cosmic Top Secret Clearance?
SickKnowledge82 3 months ago
@MoronAntidote I've done the research, you obviously haven't. Look up UFOs in history, and they continue today and are seen by all races, creeds, and professions. Statistically for all these people since the beginning of recorded history till now all telling such similar stories it would have to be a worldwide conspiracy and to what gain? To be ridiculed by your peers for claiming to see these objects? Getting fired from your aviation job, yet people are still coming forward why??
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
No you haven't done the research. All you've done is read recycled crap on websites that support your point of view. That's not research.
I'm not concerned with the general UFO thing. I actually believe life exists throughout the universe, but i haven't seen any convincing evidence that we've been visited so far.
What i do object to, is UFO zealots hijacking every piece of NASA footage showing mundane footage of well understood phenomena, as evidence for their dogma.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote Yes I have done the research and the statistics of reported events by qualified personnel is beyond mere coincidence, even stupid people can identify that. "Your physics, NASA's physics, physicists physics" What the fuck are you writing about? You never contributed to any of the theories or submitted laws that have to do with our main stream accepted physics ideologies, we all follow laws created by Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Tesla, etc, etc.. LOL "Your physics"... blasphemy
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote My argument is that the phenomenon is real and the vehicles are intelligently controlled. I base this on what NASA Apollo astronauts, hundreds of aviators from all realms claiming to see the objects have said and in many cases can be substantiated by trained radar operators on the ground. So the option is to weigh my argument on what thousands expertly trained aviators who have actually spent time in the skies claim to have seen, or one armchair physicist saying impossible. STS 29
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoronAntidote My argument is that the phenomenon is real and the vehicles are intelligently controlled. I base this on what NASA Apollo astronauts, hundreds of aviators from all realms claiming to see the objects have said and in many cases can be substantiated by trained radar operators on the ground. So the option is to weigh my argument on what thousands expertly trained aviators who have actually spent time in the skies claim to have seen, or one armchair physicist saying impossible. STS 29
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote Can explain how Dr. Leir and other surgeons have recorded and removed implants from patients that consisted of metallic alloys humans are not currently capable of reproducing? The objects being removed from human tissue were covered in the subjects own genetic material, so that the implant would not be considered a foreign object and rejected by the body, again this has been documented and happened decades ago when our science was not up to par with the objects in question.
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
How about you explain why there is no scientific evidence for your claims? Believing and regurgitating nonsense from some dodgy website on the internet is not evidence. Indiscriminately surfing the internet for confirmation of your own beliefs does not constitute research, any more than lemmings following eachother over a cliff confirms the leader had a good plan. You're the kind of person who doesn't understand the very concept of evidence. 100th hearsay is enough for you.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@MoronAntidote @SickKnowledge82 Bah, your attempts are to dismiss act condescending and all knowing similar to those in the past who fail to question thinking you're aware the cutting edge on all topics... Fact of the matter, you can act like you possess the end all say all you discredit People were selected to pilot aircraft, enter space and they have all reported these objects. Regardless of what insults you have, you know what I say is true. They aren't "dodgy websites" Statistical science...
SickKnowledge82 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
Well that was just gibberish tbh.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
@SickKnowledge82
STS-75?
Not a complete vacuum.
Shuttles cannot reach altitudes where a complete vacuum exists.
So, we have drag. Relative motion between objects with different mass and drag coefficient produces the very trajectories shown in this video. The shuttle is massive compared to the particles, which is why they all appear to decelerate and fall towards earth faster than the shuttle. All the objects make a single turn and obey orbital mechanics. Jog on.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
me too, its just beyond amazing, i mean, they seem to actually materialize from nowhere,
zenithar6666 3 months ago
The question was "If there are aliens then why don't they let themselves be known?" IMO we are an experiment, the best experiments are done without anyone but the administer knowing it is an experiment.
ND89TEN 5 months ago
I feel that we should try to make contact with them instaed of trying to first shoot them down.
005658able 5 months ago
Queenshussars What fairy-tails do you refer too,is it something I have said I know/ or something else.Please keep continuity.
Mr7777ELVIS 6 months ago
@queenshussars
Tell me of any photographs, radar returns, trace evidence and multiple eyewitness testimony of God's existence.
drmoroe30 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drmoroe30 Please continue to rebuke GOD. You need to do as you see fit.
revolutionpm 6 months ago
@queenshussars sorry to say that your just not doing homework,For 1,Most Alien issues are at Dulce ,area s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 ---There are many ways you can get the evidence.On youtube there is a film just google this
Shuttle 12 km tether snapped satellite anomalies and see something interesting,The craft NASA saw worked out to be 2.5 Nautical mile wide,The multitude of craft swarming the tether are countless,and appear then disappear? NASA is investigating,the camera on tether was to film them.
Mr7777ELVIS 6 months ago
Give me a break, some lights flashing over a picture of earth and all of a sudden the UFO phenomenon is solved. Star Trek and Star Wars videos look better and more convincing. Billions of years in existence and not one hard piece of evidence of a living being outside of earth. You'll see Jesus and Muhammad before you see an Alien.
Abudu1956 6 months ago
@Abudu1956 that is such an asinine statement
facepalmsociety15 6 months ago
@facepalmsociety15 What I said is a true statement that is proved everyday. You are the ass because you can't bring forth one proof of an UFO other than some lights bouncing around in space for what? Are they gathering resources or what? As I said billions of years in existence and not shred of evidence. Supposedly these people are advanced enough to have been traveling here when we were on horses and foot. Where was your Area 51's then?
Abudu1956 6 months ago
@Abudu1956 not a shred of proof? there is evidence, albeit not enough to be conclusive but to say that you have a better chance of meeting jesus than an alien is just fucking retarded.
i don't necessarily believe that this is alien contact but i'm not going to say it is or isn't.
facepalmsociety15 6 months ago
@facepalmsociety15 Why is it necessary to use profanity when I didn't address u that way? My adolescent sons don't need to see u act unintelligent. Jesus has supposedly been here before and has promised to return. Your alien hasn't been seen nor promised to be seen or return. Which is one is really retarded? That that has been seen before or that that has never been seen and won't? Besides that more people believe Jesus existed and will return than people believe aliens ever existed period.
Abudu1956 6 months ago
@Abudu1956 dear Sbudu,Please don,t take my user name tomean siimilar,I can,t go into detail,s unfortunately,there not little green men at all,they are for the childish,Un-human life and that of which is not of this Earth is a reality,I am sorry to ruin your religious day,If you trace back to the fallen angels,Andeluvian race,written of in the bible,and follow the chase with wikaoedia & youtube giant skeletons found Learn.God made all.He hoped small minds were not in the equation
Mr7777ELVIS 6 months ago
@Mr7777ELVIS If you venture elsewhere on the Internet to sites such Urban Legends, Hoax Slayer and others you would seen that the giant skeleton stories are hoaxes. Also, I can give websites all day showing untruths and contradictions in the Bible. You'll also find much of the Old Testament in the Book of the Dead, which predates the Old Testament by 1,500 years. You'll also find where Moses narrates his own burial; go figure that out. In other words you ain't saying nothing important.
Abudu1956 6 months ago
@facepalmsociety15 It is highly more retarded to expect something that has never been seen but talked about for trillions of years than it is to expect something there is some kind of record or evidence of. More mentally unbalanced people see little green men than they do Jesus.
Abudu1956 6 months ago
@Abudu1956 last time i checked a ufo enthusiast has never flown a plane into a building. seems like the religious people are the more mentally unbalanced ones.
trillions of years? the universe is only 14 billion years old.
there is definitely life outside of earth and i don't think its that far of a stretch that they may have made contact with us once or twice in some form or fashion.
facepalmsociety15 6 months ago
@facepalmsociety15 You have no idea what kind of enthusiasm whoever it was that committed 911 had for UFO's or anything else, just like you have no idea how old the universe is. U're relying on scientific data, which changes with every new discovery. It was scientist who sad the earth was flat and that phrenology was true. It's an eternal stretch when you can't prove it even with "one" shred of evidence. No one has ever shown us an alien; especially not an intelligent one.
Abudu1956 6 months ago
@facepalmsociety15 The Andaluvian Race bloodline is in the human race,the giants of old,s skeleton,s are being excavated around the world.They were the fallen angels from the bible.You would have a much better chance of passing them in the street more than you would ever know.Our techy things did not really come from Jesus.
The Ancient Super Powers were there before Jesus,The Aliens are written of in the Bible & is not your bible the truth.God would not lie WOULD HE.Have faith God knows all.
Mr7777ELVIS 6 months ago
@facepalmsociety15 The answer is because the average person would kill them if they were shown and left to mingle,they would be crucified or stabbed like Christ was.Yes sadly the human race is like that,We come in Peace Shoot to Kill.that is why we offer them protection.They are only named Alien because they have not been availed to you and declared.We call it plausible Deniability.They were always here.minders like us know that you are not ready You most dont like your President Think
Mr7777ELVIS 6 months ago
If thats real video then yeah there is something going on there! lol I mean come on.. put your thinking caps on..
mkirby714 7 months ago
It astounds me that people are so adamant to believe that there is no other intelligent life in our infinite universe except our human race. Our galaxy alone is a mere atom sized speck on the galactic map of the universe(s). To deny that other life is existent is mere ignorance. Because they cannot see it; they cannot believe it. You cannot see your God or prove his/her/their existence; yet you believe?
MrsUfulu 8 months ago
@MrsUfulu
I think it's worth pointing out that people who deny the existence of ET in videos such as this, don't necessarily deny that life exists elsewhere. This is the classic assumption that people make, and much of the time it's completely unfounded. It is entirely acceptable and plausible for someone to deny evidence in every single NASA video to date, yet still believe life exists throughout the universe. Belief of existence doesn't require evidence of visitation. Think on this!
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
@MrsUfulu We can see the evidence of a Creator. Where is your evidence of an alien or other intelligent life? For those of us who believe in a Creator, not Jesus or some man in flesh or on a cloud but, a Creative Force we know the works of that Creator. Show me one piece of evidence or work created beyond earth by an intelligent being? I'm not saying there is no other life in the universe. I'm saying it's no smarter than us or dumber.
Abudu1956 6 months ago
Chris Everard is a bullshitter!
Quote "A piece of rock just a few mm across would rip through the shuttle and cause a fatal accident".
This hasn't happened.
How long has the ISS been in orbit? It hasn't happened!
This is your typical bogus argument from an anti-NASA fuckwit. There is no logical correlation between ice/debris particles generated by space vehicles and meteors. Relative velocity appears to be an alien (ironic) concept to this turd!
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
look at us! look how clever we are! XD
xXBadassXx 8 months ago
debris and ice crystals don't align in a nearly perfect circle...
for those of you morons quick to judge, watch the video to the end, and unless your blind, you'll see it.
slangshotstudios 8 months ago
@slangshotstudios
There's no perfect circle here.
So what's your point?
Anyone can take a snapshot of objects in natural motion and claim a miracle.
It's never a perfect circle, and the pattern evolves over time in a natural manner.
What's the big deal?
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
@MoronAntidote
dude at 2:40 a nearly perfect circle made up of lights is clearly visible at the center of the frame and then another orb lights up in the dead center. are you blind or just in denial?
slangshotstudios 8 months ago
@slangshotstudios
A nearly perfect circle?
What's so great about that?
It's nothing like perfect, and it's only a transient formation.
The objects are just moving naturally in the wake of the shuttle, and that's that.
What's so special about it? Do the constellations imply intelligence? What's so improbable about a brief, lousy approximation of a circle compared with the probabiity of life on earth, or a circular pattern of leaves caught in the wind?
Get real man!
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
@MoronAntidote in denial
slangshotstudios 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@slangshotstudios
Head up your arse!
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
@slangshotstudios
Strange how we can find far better geometric shapes on earth then, but nobody makes silly claims about them.
At least on earth, such shapes exist for more than a few seconds.
Talk about a 'snap-shot' mentality. Oh look, those bits of crap made a shitty circle for a few seconds, but lets ignore what happened before and after ;) Think?
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
bcjammer if you have evidence to back it up I would love to see it....keeping in mind NASA has no evidence they are releasing regarding this clip. I wonder why
dahoff84 8 months ago
wtf? you UFO folks are idiots for claiming this vid as proof. I'm not saying there isn't advanced life out there but this vid doesn't show what you guys say it does;
no "dancing" lights no formation no lighting up are you even watching the same vid??? this is crap
oh I love how none scientists with NO space film analyzation experience just KNOW what is on these films. As if you comprehend how solar winds, radiation, an everything else in the NONE-void of space interacts and as if you compr
bcjammer 9 months ago
@bcjammer You sir are in denial.
Marlboro391 8 months ago
Aren't we really the aliens? We have only been here a short time but so convinced of our universal power. To another planet we are the ufo's, take it from the hunter herself, oh ya I know stuff.
UFOHunter86 9 months ago
Got one!!
UFOHunter86 9 months ago
also the orbs are wavy becouse of the Nitrogen and Oxygen in Earths athmosphere. It's a ture video to me.
outwithlunch 9 months ago
Becouse they dont want to get SHOT BY BULLETS thats why thay dont land offen.
outwithlunch 9 months ago
Obviously, this being YouTube, it's difficult to know what is real and what isn't. I'd like to see the raw source of this video at some point.
Though, if it is real, here's what I have to say: "Holy. Fucking. Shit."
SpadesNeil 9 months ago
deez bitches b takin our jobs
SoloWing808 9 months ago
MAN THIS IS ONE OF THEM VIDEOS U JUST CANT EXPLAIN AWAY I DONT GIV A FUCK WHO U ARE
marcos71580 9 months ago
@marcos71580 You remind me of those people who go, "FUCKING MAGNETS, HOW DO THEY WORK? I DON'T WANT TO TALK TO A SCIENTIST, YA'LL MOTHER FUCKERS LYIN' AND GETTIN' ME PISSED."
In short, you sound like a jackass. Also, all caps doesn't help you look smart. In fact it hurts your argument.
SpadesNeil 9 months ago
@SpadesNeil yeah, well that's like your opinion, man.
lotteein420 9 months ago
"I see DEAD aliens"... hehe No seriously folks, even at light speed these guys traveled hundreds of years, to get here, just to stare at our lightning storms and probe our butts... they ae SO DEAD when they get back home, for wasting all that money!!
doceigen 9 months ago
Where are these things supposed to be? The moon? Mercury? Some random satellite? That hardly looks like any familiar terrain around us
mokitehwolf 10 months ago
@mokitehwolf
This is maybe a little difficult for some, but since it is a space shuttle video taken by NASA, hence STS-80, it is safe to assume the video was taken while in orbit of the earth. The last I heard the shuttle was not capable of escaping earth orbit.
ArJuna22 9 months ago 10
@ArJuna22 I know eh. Denial of our planet. People need to take their meds.
WorldwideWakeupCall 7 months ago
@mokitehwolf sts80 was in eath orbit
realityexplorations 7 months ago
hëhe_í_sìgñed_ûp_ät_fùll_tïlt_pøker
_üsïñg_rëferrål_cødé:_you600_and_göt_ã_600_Ðòllar_bõñûs
taragamble7365454 10 months ago
Has NASA ever actually tried to explain this footage before? Just curious. The objects, whatever they are, seem to be purposefully spaced .. they don't float aimlessly like an ice crystal might. A debris cloud of ice or shuttle fragments would be chaotic, right? This just seems more organized.
Elentaurel 10 months ago
@Elentaurel ya funny thing u mention ice crystals cuz thats exactly what they tried to say it was. also the lenses on these cameras are set to "infinity" focus, meaning theres no way that an ice particle can show up, especially not like these
petscorpion 10 months ago
Do i hear whispering at the end of the video ?
Vortex93 10 months ago
@Vortex93 no thats in your head
MeesterCrumpet 10 months ago
This guy is a complete idiot. Intelligent beings? Hah. They're *all* bits of ice and debris. And no, it's not unsafe for the shuttle or ISS to be there because they came *from* the shuttle, so they move at very low velocity wrt it. It regularly dumps excess water from its fuel cells that *must* freeze into lots of tiny ice crystals -- physics says it must. And they'll be in the same orbit, flashing in the sunrise as shown here, drifting around until they slowly sublimate or drift away.
ApolloWasReal 10 months ago
@astrobant2 man, really. GET A LIFE! Go out, admire a beautiful girl, have kids with her. Look at the stars and then realize how small we are in the universe. If you have all that already, look again man. You are missing most every thing. Good luck.
jaimegenesis60 10 months ago
@jaimegenesis60
what the hell was the point of that patheticly sappy bullshit comment
MeesterCrumpet 10 months ago
Hey Beevis and Butthead are alive!! That was Beevis's new space cycle zipping in front of the sky "fartknockers"! Whoa did you see that guys nice suit looks like he got it from Mens Warehouse or Bloomingdales!! Those emerging dots on the screen are "photo shopped in"
yetibiker08 11 months ago
I want to believe, but this isn't even remotely convincing.
SlowRiotNewKanada 11 months ago
Specks of dust ?
shoom013 11 months ago
@shoom013 specks of dust... city-size following clouds rather than being stucked to a telescope???
joe1977poland 11 months ago
Meteors won't float in space like that so it's not meteors kapish
renekenshin6573 11 months ago
Yep. These ARE ice crystals, space junk, and debris. Tiny bits of stuff float around every mission and we can see them when CCD light enhancement is used. Most of this would probably not be visible to the naked eye. The close ones are out of focus and look like translucent orbs.
There are many videos which show this now. If it's some big secret, why do you UFO idiots think they would keep releasing them?
Astrobrant2 11 months ago
@Astrobrant2 (So) ice crystals glow and have energy around them when they look like there in formation in a circle go back 2 sleep your talking out your ass some people need to stop and think you should not open your mouth just making yourself look worse. ooook.
budzag 11 months ago
@budzag Ice crystals and other objects reflect light, and using CCD light-enhancing technology, we're are seeing things much brighter than they would appear to the naked eye. There are many videos now, showing this debris.
The objects which are larger are closer to the window and out of focus. In the tether video, you can see the focus and zoom change and they become dots. UFO fans still think they're huge space ships.
I see NOTHING like a formation, and what "energy" do you think you see?
Astrobrant2 11 months ago
@budzag
Nope. That's just a bullshit evaluation on your part. It doesn't need to be argued against because all that nonense about 'glow and energy around them' is just evidence of how little you know about cameras/optics/physics. A rough 'apparent' circle in 3 dimensions is proof of nothing, when virtually perfect circles occur in nature regularly right here on earth. It's just not an argument dude.
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
@Astrobrant2 lol did you watch the video? Perhaps Buzz Aldrin is an idiot too? Like many of the other astronauts? You're a rather condescending prick to call others idiots because they believe this is a ufo. From imperical observation i would say the "ufo idiots" make a much better case than an ass clown like you
kayaksta 11 months ago
@kayaksta Apparently YOU did not watch what Buzz Aldrin said.
Yes, I watched the video, and I've seen it before. These are small bits of debris, probably mostly ice. They are around all our space missions and show up easily in enhanced photography. Some people will read what I have said, look it up a little further, and say, "Ha! I guess he was right. These really are just bits of debris."
Other people who want to protect their fantasies, no matter what, will call me a "condescending prick."
Astrobrant2 11 months ago
@Astrobrant2
Right on both counts.
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
@MoronAntidote That can be taken two ways. lol
Astrobrant2 10 months ago
What a load of shite!
mistahbtheoryz 11 months ago
Why does it have to be a craft. I like to think of the possibility of magnetic jelly fish, living off the magnet field of our planet.... We have just began to scratch the surface.
blazin421 1 year ago
the government doesnt want u to know that aliens (other creatures) actually live inside human bodies
n17r0gen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like this video if you want to hear some NEW information on a 1940 Alien encounter that was BIGGER than ROSWEL then Check out my NEW vid "The UFO & ALIEN Chronicles" .........MUST SEE VIDEO...
goforitrandy 1 year ago
I think it is unlikely that these are Alien space craft.
Although from all the various footage I have seen, NASA missions ufo footage, it does seem to me that there are things outside our atmosphere that appear to be quite happy floating around and doing there thing, In space. There more like organisms than Alien space vessels. It kind of reminds me of Organism which survive and live near scorching hot volcanic outlets at the bottom of the ocean.
TheReddwarff100 1 year ago
thumbs down this video is crap i didnt see anything on there but a refracted light image on the lens of the camera. any highschooler thats getting an A in science could show you whats happening.
bmareci 1 year ago
It's not extraterrestrials. It's top secret technology. All these ufologists are spreading disinformation. Look up Tesla and his flying machine.
Klaffveinz 1 year ago
@Klaffveinz lol looks nothing like that
ZomgMetalRules1989 1 year ago
I would also like to state that the government lets out authentic information but it also counters it with bogus stories so that we stay in a state of doubt. Our government fears the result of such information to the public at large. When you look at comments made by people on Youtuve you can understand their hesitation of divulging facts about many issues. Some people just could not handle it and others will not believe regardless of the proof. So I can understand their stance on this issue
roblou62 1 year ago
I would not call these ufo but I would call them extraterrestial life forms of some sort. They could be something on the line of Jellyfish, they could be/are intelligent. Please people it is time we all understand that when you break cells down to their most basic state it still deems that someone must have created it. Just look up a bacterial flagellum. It has gears and sockets and this is a living organism. To think all this just "happened" is akin to hiding your head in the sand.
roblou62 1 year ago
That's just space debris grouping together in a formation saying, look at us, we are just space debris.
nils4545 1 year ago
@nils4545 - good one.. :-) Or space baloons that went too high in the space and decided to gather around to find their way back home.. :D
strangerindanger 1 year ago
That's just O-Qua Tangin Wann on the Biaviian mothership.
cyman52 1 year ago
Gay
Skip01 1 year ago
What people don't understand about Nasa and most of the government is that if they don't want something to be leaked, it won't be leaked. Wikileaks be damned- if the US really, truly wants something to be top secret, it is, and it will be.
Other than that, this is very interesting. I don't believe in UFOs, but this does certainly make you wonder.
M210F 1 year ago
FUCK YEAH!!! I LOVE YOU ALIENS!!
FUCK ALL THE SHITHOLE NON-BELIEVERS!!!
tury47 1 year ago