These places are fakes!! They didn't help at all.They force only the option of adoption agencies and will go as far as calling CPS(child's protective services) on the women,to help aid adoption agencies to collect more infants.People never ever trust The pregnancy crisis centers they are fetus snatchers.
Wow, this video is so bias it's not even funny. The fact that anyone would choose to purposely end the life of an unborn child, because it's convenient for them, because it's their "choice", is abominable . What "right" does anyone have to make the decision for the unborn child? I bet if you asked the baby, he/she would chose life always.
@hiccup86 What right does another person have to force another person into giving up the fetus they do want? But force you to keep one(terminally ill fetus) you don't want?
It is so scary to me that a t a time when a young woman has to make a big decision for herself, that she might get WRONG medical information. How can these centers not get in trouble for giving out wrong info?
Wonderful video. These "crisis pregnancy centers" run by religious groups hand out lies and misinformation to women and should all be shut down. It would be more helpful to spend our tax dollars on preventing pregnancy, with cheap and easy access contraception.
Thanks to all the brave young women and men who created this video. It's horrifying to watch the anti-choice community systematically chip away at our harn-won rights. How can the Federal Government cut funding to education and give money to these monsters? Enough is enough.
CPCs overwhelmingly DO NOT lie about the effects of abortion. The link between abortion and increased risk of breast cancer is well-established. Only one published study has found no link; a couple dozen have confirmed the link. Plus, while it often takes years or decades to show up, the risk of depression, suicide, substance abuse, etc., is FAR higher among post-abortion women than the general population. Stop lying, NARAL, NOW, NAF, and Planned Parenthood!
WOW! I can't believe this information...I can't believe they would actually put these lies into this video. All you have to do is a little research and you can find out for yourself that the information that the CPC puts out IS ACCURATE.
what is this? not the content but the video itself; it looks extremely well done for just youtube (other than the obvious org that is behind the video) but for a documentary or expose
I am so glad to see these places getting busted for the disgusting misinformation they provide on a daily basis. Why isn't more work being done to strip federal funding from crazy zealous organizations like these? I have always greatly appreciated the personal, private, medically-accurate care I received from Planned Parenthood when I was too embarrassed to go to my mother and ask "what's wrong with me?"
White people who run these death cults never make the case FOR abortion as in: we advocate the abortion because....they only attack and undermind the choice of life. If you undermine our natural inclination to choose life, then ka-ching goes the unPlanned Parenthood cash register.
@Cmsgret This is ridiculous. I fully support the choice to have a child. I also fully support the right to terminate a pregnancy. I've known plenty of mothers and pregnant women who show up at pro-choice rallies. I've never heard of anyone advocating for abortion for the unwilling. But the "pro-life" people want to force women to endure pregnancy and childbirth, whether they want to or not!
i really don't know why people are arguing about the stupid facts. i don't care if an abortion clinic offered services to a pimp and an underage girl. i don't care if abortion is connected to cancer.
i care that with every abortion, a doctor is committing murder and getting away with it. i don't get how people can be okay with abortion. if i went into a pregnant panda right now, and ripped out her young baby, PETA and the rest of the world would be giving me death threats. human life matters.
@poserrkids No, it's not a panda yet, and if there were more than about 4,000 total left worldwide and there wasen't an extensive and expensive conservation effort to increase their numbers, I really wouldn't care what you aborted.
Abortions are about not wanting a baby. Panda babies are not only wanted but their is a lot of money spent trying to make them. So your arguement sucks.
@PeanutButterBlood Yup. And both are financially reliant on the abortion industry. Ever take a Critical Thinking class? Let's look at health organizations which do not offer abortions ... what do they say?
- The Polycarp Research Institute of PA: Abortion = breast cancer
- MaterCare International of Canada: Abortion = breast cancer
- Breast Cancer Prevention Institute of NY: Abortion = breast cancer
- National Physicians Center for Family Resources of AL: Abortion = breast cancer
@PeanutButterBlood World Health Organization has declared birth control pills as a Class One carcinogen. National Cancer Institute admitted induced abortion elevates breast cancer risk by 40%. If you want to see the written admission, I can send you the link. More info:
@ProLifeChristian Oh, hello you. Spouting the same old nonsense, are we?
mediamatters (dot) org/blog/201102010014
I am sure I'm not the only one who sees the irony in an organization calling themselves "Live Action" and then admitting they heavily edit their videos before release. They actually ended up exposing the complete opposite.
@ProLifeChristian Yeah I did watch them, and they didn't show anything. The people offered them medical care, then called authorities to report the incident. No wrong-doing, just tired conservative tactics to try to discredit a reputable organization.
@sparkylovesmangos Search "Planned Parenthood Live Action" on YouTube or google "Live Action (dot) org" You will see tons of videos of many Planned Parenthood clinics caught on tape aiding & abetting sex trafficking & rape of underage age girls. Not just one video but multiple videos of PP staff aiding & abetting of underage teen prostitution. Nobody forced PP staff to break the law...they willingly choose to do so. PP got caught & tried to back-pedal by reporting if to govt after the fact
@sparkylovesmangos Planned Parenthood is now under investigation by government. Pro-choice supporters are desperately to deny. Full length videos & unedited videos have been turned over to the government. U.S. Congress is now starting the motion to de-fund Planned Parenthood. Why should U.S. taxpayers subsidize an organization that has been caught aiding & abetting teen prostitution? Planned Parenthood could have called the police on the spot....but they didn't...it's their own fault
@ProLifeChristian What branch of government is investigating Planned Parenthood? Would it be the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which Planned Parenthood called after people PRETENDING to be pimps and whore (WHAT WEIRDOS!!) showed up at their offices telling a bunch of lies? BTW, the Pence Amendment will never pass the Senate.
@ProLifeChristian That's a lie. The NCI has asserted exactly the opposite: that there is no relationship between abortion and breast cancer. Check out cancer dot gov
Hahah! Are you the same person who told me I should take a critical thinking class? Yet, you direct me to two websites which have an obvious bias? Methinks someone should take their own advice.
@PeanutButterBlood No, I am not the person who told you to enroll in a critical thinking class. Please double check your Inbox & you'll find that is was somebody else.
I went to crisis center before planned parenthood and instead of counsling me they shoved religion down my throat and spoke to me in a manner that was meant to degrade and make me feel guilt. I went to planned parenthood after leaving in the middle of there "counseling" because i didn't appreciate being told i'm going to hell when i do not believe in such a place. i am emotionally sound, have no scarring inside. 100% fine...so tell me again...abortion hurts women? or it hurts YOUR morals?
To see actual abortion videos & witness the sheer brutality & violence imposed on the unborn baby during an abortion, type this into your search engine.
1) abortioninstruments
2) abortionNo
The above will lead you to websites that contain abortion videos that graphically expose the horrific cruelty of abortion on the innocent & voiceless unborn child.
Type in abort73 to see a video revealing how 1st trimester aborted babies are fully formed babies that look human not "a blob of tissue"
The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons published a study titled, "The Breast Cancer Epidemic." It showed that, among seven risk factors, abortion is the "best predictor of breast cancer," and fertility is also a useful predictor. (23 Oct 2007)
If anybody wants to review an entire 10 pg report from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research & National Cancer Institute that concludes oral contraceptive & induced abortion is associated with elevated breast cancer risk, pls let me know
I can send you a link to the report published in Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention Journal 09: 18 (4) Apr 09
At top of left column on pg 1163 from line 3 - 5:
"Induced abortion & oral contraceptive use were associated with an increased risk for breast cancer"
Many women have died from legal abortion. Google "Blackmun Wall" for a listing of the women killed by legal abortions & the circumstances of their death. It is is named after Harry Blackmun, the Supreme Court justice who wrote the Roe v. Wade decision & launched America's abortion Holocaust
National Cancer Institute held a workshop (2003) that concluded abortion does not increase risk of breast cancer. Here is what the National Cancer Institute (NCI) doesn't tell you: Planned Parenthood (USA's largest abortion provider) has been reported to donate millions of dollars to NCI. Thus, NCI relies on abortion money to fund their research & thus an incentive for bias research exists. It is believed salaries of cancer researchers come from abortion money . Obvious conflict of interest
More about the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) conference that concluded no link between abortion & breast cancer. Dr. L. Brinton, a leading NCI researcher, neglected to tell you the following on the NCI website: Scientists who did indeed find links between abortion & elevated risk of breast cancer were deliberately not allowed to present their data & research at the 2003 conference. Only doctors who found no link between abortion & breast cancer were allowed to present their papers
Breast cancer studies in China & Turkey (2009) reported significant elevated breast cancer risk in women with abortions
Turkish breast cancer study published in World J of Surg Oncology 2009;7:37
China breast cancer study by Humana Press, online publication Sept 2009
Many US breast cancer studies depend on funding from National Cancer Institute. NCI relies on funding from abortionists & pro-abortion US Representatives in government. Thus NCI is under pressure to conceal abortion-cancer link
@tgirll What a help. I'm sure that all those things will last at least a week, which really makes a difference when we are talking about a 18+ year commitment.
This is so sad. I volunteer at one of these and this is taken to the extreme. I can't speak from evey center, but it's not this way. It's a resource center. The pregnancy tests we give the client does the testing. We let them read the results and have them say negative or positive. We provide info on all methods; abortion, adoption planning or keeping the child. We never claim to be medical professional and refer people to actual medical professionals. This makes my heart sad.
Will someone please tell the genius in this propaganda film that there is a BIG DIFFERENCE between an RN and an NP. And did they REALLY need to bring in the transvestite from the ACLU? Oh, and why is it NOT ok to use taxpayer $ to stop baby killing but you could use it TO kill babies BY FUNDING PP? You people are freakin' brainwashed zombies. Seriously, wake up and smell the MURDER that abortion is. One day you will be held accountable for NOT doing anything....
@FREEAMERICANOW69 The state of CA's tax payers paid $52 billion to MediCal that was directly spent on abortions for women who have MediCal.What is constitutionally supported is the right to LIFE.Science has CLEARLY proven that at conception,a seperate HUMAN BEING is present with SEPERATE DNA than the parents. Abortion is the destruction and MURDER of a HUMAN BEING, and is legal because it is a BILLION $ industry. Alsp, PP get's BILLIONS in tax $ and is the #1 abortion provider in the nation.
wrong, 14th amendment said that no state can't take a person's LIFE away w/o due process---a fetus is not clearly a person, since it's a BIO-parasite to the woman's body and how would it receive due process for life against the woman's will and due process for liberty, anyways?
Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with "malice aforethought". ABORTION is legal and supported by the constitution (13th and 14th amendment) for a woman and her reproductive rights.
Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo, resulting in or caused by its death.
abortion been legal BEFORE RvW...i suggest you do your homework and STOP listening to pro-life fascists propaganda
@threebabyms Way to be transphobic. As for taxpayer dollars, the problem lies in the fact that abortion is legal, whereas using government money to facilitate your desire to proselytize is not. Abortion is not murder; murder is the UNLAWFUL killing of a human being, and abortion is legal, whether you like it or not. And by brainwashed zombies you mean "people who hold an opinion that I don't agree with".
Sepreation of church & state is like the equator. You cant really see it but you know its there & documented; but its crossed all the time, everyday & usually for money.And the thing with PAS is one-sided, the crisis center does'nt amit is that the only women that get PAS were those that either 1) didnt want to get an abortion because the preg. was wanted but had to for medical reason or 2) were unsure/did'nt quite make up their minds in the first place.
@EspressoFan4Life no it isn't. because you attack the tone of the narrator's voice rather than refute facts. that makes you look not very smart. if your side didn't practice deception, bunk information and in many cases murder you wouldn't sound like an idiot.
@EspressoFan4Life the fact that you have to insult the voice of the person speaking rather than attack the actual information presented doesn't help your cause and makes you look like an idiot.
Great points, @Ophelia734 ! One of the "pro-life" champions, Garry Bauer was asked on CSpan if he and his wife would adopt any unwanted children (to save them from abortion). His reply was "We already have children, so we don't want to deny the many parents trying to adopt their opportunity." How unselfish!!!
So why are so many unwanted children staying in foster care until they are thrown out on their own at age 18?!?!?
P.S. to the post about Gary Bauer: We "pro-choicers" are experts on the adoption of unwanted children in America, in part because we have adopted 5 of our own after raising our first five.
Anybody who uses "some nasal, effeminate idiot narrate all of these 'facts' in feigned outrage simply isn't impressive." as their basis for determining what is "solid journalism" obvious has a solid scientific background, NOT !
@EspressoFan4Life, "anecdotal evidence"? "anecdotal evidence"? The Roman Catholic Church is based on nothing but a mountain of "anecdotal evidence".
If there were women in the leadership of the R.C. Church, they would understand why not every pregnancy should progress all the way to delivery, but the reasoin they don't is that "Jesus didn't choose any women to be priests". Wow what persuasive "anecdotal evidence" !!! Google "JesusWouldBeFurious" for much more.
I know a woman who has struggled with breast cancer for 6 years as a direct result of taking the morning after pill(a form of abortion). The morning after and 'birth control' both contain high estrogen doses and any doctor will put money on you getting cancer if you use them regularly.
@harrygoonix How do you know it was "a direct result of taking the morning after pill"? Do you have psychic abilities? I can tell you that no doctors would "put money on" anyone getting cancer from that medicine. That is an absolute misunderstanding.
@northwhale Scientists studying breast cancer in China & Turkey who do not rely on pro-abortion politicians for funding reported in 2009 that there is indeed significant elevated breast cancer risk in women with abortions:
Turkish breast cancer study. Citation: Ozmen et al. Breast cancer risk factors in Turkish women. Published in World Journal of Surgery Oncology 2009;7:37
China breast cancer study by Humana Press, online publication Sept 09
@ashtonsmama020206 How do you know for a fact that the women you know with breast cancer have never had an abortion? Many women will not admit they have had an abortion. Also, abortion is just one factor that causes breast cancer. There are many other risk factors that elevate breast cancer risk - excessive weight gain & alcohol intake, lack of exercise, unhealthy diet, never having given birth, not breastfeeding, 2nd trimester miscarriage.
@ProLifeChristian You are displaying a poor knowledge of breast cancer risk factors. Here's an ACCURATE list: age (a woman’s chances of getting breast cancer increase as she gets older), a family history of breast cancer, an early age at first menstrual period, a late age at menopause, a late age at the time of birth of her first full-term baby, and certain breast conditions. Obesity is also a risk factor for breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
@harrygoonix Firstly, the morning after pill isn't a form of abortion. It prevents pregnancy, just as normal birth control does, except it is a higher dosage of hormones. Secondly, there is no medical(factual) evidence that the morning after pill causes breast cancer. In fact, health organizations have stated that abortions do not lead to breast cancer risk at all. You, sir, are severely uneducated and probably a conservative Christian.
I wonder how Jesus Christ would feel about your characterization of the poor as "lazy welfare queens". I'm fairly sure it's not very christian-like to hate sinners, instead of just hating the sin.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
A video accusing of passing misinformation uses "Rachel" to pass misinformation. Rachel, you could have had all those things you said you wanted & given the child up for adoption. Why vid never asked her about adoption?
Megan, is it possible the pregnancy test was botched and the boogie man preg center was not out to "mislead" you? Doctors and abortionists make errors too. Do they have ulterior motives too?
To do an abortion seems medically relevant, and so is going to term and delivering life.
@2000yrCatholic How 'bout we try some factual information, shall we? Abortion is the termination of ones pregnancy and per the CDC, it is one of the most common and yes, *safest* surgical procedures performed in the US. You can call any clinic who provides this service for women and you will find that they will absolutely give this basic factual information. Facts... you know, objective reality... something which is not up for debate (psst, what you're going on about is merely your opinion)
On March 1, 1989, Erica Richardson, a 16-year-old Maryland resident, bled to death from a punctured uterus only hours after undergoing a LEGAL abortion. During the next five months, two adult women, Gladys Estanislao and Debra Gray, also died from abortion complications. They too were residents of Maryland.
@2000yrCatholic, If abortion is murder, then prosecute the murderers. In the U.S.A., legislators and courts -NOT bishops - define crimes. Do you know the difference between the U.S.A. and the Vatican? Our legisltors and courts know criminal sexual abuse of innocent children. Your pope and bishops have demonstrated how INFERIOIR they are to our legisltors and courts, so why are you so impressed with the teaching of your leacherous priests & short-sighted bishops?!?!
"Choice USA, an activist, abortion-promoting group, claims that women must be informed about their safe and legal reproductive health choices. They say these choices include abstinence, contraception, abortion, adoption, and parenthood. If you take a closer look at America, however, you begin to see that this same pro-choice movement has basically eliminated abstinence, adoption, and parenthood from a womans list of options"
Carolina Gutierrez died six weeks after her safe and LEGAL abortion. An infection set in from her perforated (cut) uterus. Her gangrenous legs were amputated during that time in an effort to save her life, but she did not survive.
I would like to see your source for the bold claim that money is going to these CPC's. They are run on donations & are charitable organizations. If you can prove this claim, it would make this vid credible!
@angelshoulders Public federal funding of CPC's began in 1996 when the federal welfare reform law allocated $50 million to Title V abstinence-only education programs, including CPC's. Now, direct funding of CPC's began in 2000 under the 'Special Projects of Regional Significance Program' (via the maternal and child health block grant) in 2002 $6 million went directly to CPC's (info obtained from SIECUS: Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Edrica is the third known death among Planned Parenthood patients in California in the last four years. Holly Patterson, 18, died of an infection after a LEGAL DOSE OF THE SAFE DRUG, RU-486 abortion in 2003.
@angelshoulders - In 2005, 536,000 women died of maternal causes... please tell me that you are not suggesting that we outlaw gestation due to these numbers. You are aware that every surgery poses a certain risk, are you not? Incidentally, there are about 7,600 deaths due to non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs -such as aspirin- per year & yet, those are still safe & legal (imagine that.) It's nice that we allow people to weigh the risks prior to taking/undergoing any medical drug/procedure.
The American Medical Association is responsible for the extermination of millions, upon millions, upon millions of human beings. They are doing in under the guise of a medical procedure and they are expoliting women in order to profit from the extermination of these human beings. Any person who says it's a "woman's choice" has bought into the propaganda of blaming women for the extermination of these humans beings.
Obmam believes in partial birth abortions&infanticide,allowing a baby from an induced labor abortion to die without treatment.He voted against the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. He was the only state senator to speak against this law on the floor of the Illinois Senate. We are not talking about a"fetus" in the womb.This bill was solely to protect LIVE BORN BABIES!The Born Alive Infant Protection Act was legislation that would require hospitals to care for infants who survive an abortion.
As a state senator, Obama saw BAIPA for what it was: an ideologically-motivated ploy to vilify women and doctors who choose abortion. On the state Senate floor on April 4, 2002, he explained, "This issue ultimately is about abortion and not live births. Because if there are children being born alive, I, at least, have confidence that a doctor who is in that room is going to make sure that they're looked after."
kcs...The eVIDANCE suggest that America has indeed chosen a president Who Doesnt Mind Murdering Helpless Infants,though He sure seems to talk about"change",without mentioning the changes he plans to make.Obama thinks that human life is something which can be taken away by the majority,if the majority doesnt want that life around.Since there is no lawful penalty upon that life,allowing it TO be taken from them LEGALLY. Grammatically this would IN FACT be known as MURDER, or at best MANSLAUGHTER
@angelshoulders - the evidence suggests that America has chosen a president who trusts our medical community and the policies it puts forth in order to protect all people. Oh, that and that America was ready for a change from the status quo of politics in general. By the way, murder is the intentional killing of a person by a sane person with intent, malice aforethought and no legal reason... you do not get to alter the meanings of words in order to suit your agenda.
Equally troubling is the fact that the law Obama opposed would have required doctors to make efforts at life-saving for any infant that shows a "sign of life" even when there was no chance the baby would survive, a practice that Dr. Lauren Streicher, an obstetrician at Northwestern Medical Hospital who often delivers pre-term babies who will not survive, refers to as "torture."
The law also defines "born alive" as meaning "the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion."
The feeling of the majority was that the bill (even as amended) still created great uncertainty about whether it would compromise abortion rights. It looked like yet another case of advocates trying to inject politics into the practice of medicine; we saw a desire to keep those those key questions (about abortion rights) unclear.
Obama spoke against the legislation in 2001 and 2002 and single-handedly defeated it in committee in 2003.
Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. Sponsored bill providing contraceptives at taxpayers expense. Babies who survive their abortions are not protected by the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
But BAIPA isn't really about protecting infants; it is anti-abortion rights legislation crafted by the hard right. BAIPA targets the abortion procedure known as dilation and extraction, which anti-choicers have so successfully re-branded as "partial birth abortion." Dilation and extraction accounts for less than one-fifth of one percent of all American abortions, and is used most often to end wanted pregnancies in which expectant parents learn their baby will not be viable outside of the womb.
Wait one minute kcs...did you not qualify a baby's first breath as when his/her life begins? Wow, you best be watching those botched abortions that deliver livning breathing human beings
@angelshoulders - Please do feel free to reference the quote, by me, in which I mention anything at all about a "baby's first breath" - until & unless you can, I must remind you that using misinformation or outright lies has never been an effective arguing tool. Tsk, tsk and all that.
In addition, BAIPA was riddled with provisions that alarmed both defenders of abortion rights and the mainstream medical community in Illinois, including the Illinois Hospital Association and the Illinois State Medical Society, both of which opposed the package of bills.
When he signed the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act on August 5, 2002, President Bush said, "This important legislation ensures that every infant born alive -- including an infant who survives an abortion procedure -- is considered a person under federal law." He added, "Today, through sonograms and other technology, we can see clearly that unborn children are members of the human family, as well."
You dont have any point at all or an opinion of your own do you? You just spout of things that you copy and paste from other websites. It's so pathetic
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The researchers reported that the elevated rates of substance use among women who had abortions might be linked to higher levels of anxiety,depression,& unresolved grief which have been measured in other studies of women with a history of abortion.
There is no such medical term as a "partial birth abortion." NPR has an excellent factual look at the D&X debate, noting that contrary to the claims of some abortion opponents, most such abortions do not take place in the third trimester of pregnancy, or after fetal "viability." Indeed, when some members of Congress tried to amend the bill to ban only those procedures that take place after viability, abortion opponents complained that would leave most of the procedures legal.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The study found that among women who had unintended first pregnancies,those who had abortions were more likely to report more frequent & recent use of alcohol, marijuana, &cocaine
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@angelshoulders Because those poor fornicating sinners have embraced Satan and not Jesus! They must be helped to cease all sexual and drug sins, so that they can devote the proper amount of time to mourning their dead baby (or babies) and trying to stop other women from being allowed to use their weak, Satan-influenced minds to decide to kill their babies.
lamb....What are you talking about. I'm talking about women dying while undergoing a 'safe & legal" procedure to end the life of their baby, whom they indeed, helped to create! They die trying to kill their own baby. The baby had no way of avoiding his/her circumstances, the mother had all the 'choice' in that. But by her 'say' the child loses his/her LIFE! At what point do you believe a human life begins?
Congress had received testimony that some infants who had been born alive after unsuccessful abortions were left to die. We issued clear guidance that withholding medical care from an infant born alive may constitute a violation of the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act and the Medicare Conditions of Participation."
The Neonatal Resuscitation Program Steering Committee coordinates, develops & implements edu. programs & materials that promote optimal care & resuscitation of newborns. Its the vision of the NRPSC to have every newborn in need of resuscitation effectively cared for by health care professionals & collaborates with relevant stakeholders, incl the Committee on Fetus & Newborn, Section on Perinatal Pediatrics, ACOG & & Canadian Pediatric Society
@angelshoulders - It's pretty telling how utterly silent you are when it comes to the number of women who die during pregnancy/childbirth? Particularly considering that the number of women who die from pregnancy/childbirth is vastly greater than the number of women who die from abortion. Heck, half a million women per year die trying to gestate/give birth to a baby; these poor women who lose their LIVES, why no concern for them? At what point do you believe the lives of women to be significant?
kcsorci....Where is your proof, source and statistics for that is a blatant lie. You expect us to believe that rubbish?!? You insult the utube readers. You want the truth, you can't handle the truth.
@angelshoulders - You want proof that there is no such medical procedure as "partial birth" abortion? Do you have a medical dictionary? Look it up, dear. Yep, that's right... doesn't exist.
In a"wish list"memorandum signed by PPFA&over 60 other pro-abortion organizations&submitted to the Obama transition team in November 2008,the groups said,"It is imperative that the President put forward a health care reform plan that guarantees access to comprehensive,high-quality,affordable health care for all. . .Comprehensive benefits must include access to the full range of reproductive health services, including contraception, maternity care, & ABORTION care."
President Obama believes "that the federal government should not use its dollars to intrude on a poor woman's decision whether to carry to term or to terminate her pregnancy and selectively withhold benefits because she seeks to exercise her right of reproductive choice in a manner the government disfavors."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Every year, well over 1,000,000 children lose their lives through abortion in America. For decades, existing federal law has prohibited the use of taxpayer funds from paying for abortions. But now a radical change would take place if the Democrat's health care bill becomes law, our government would force pro-life taxpayers to pay for abortions.
President Obama "believes that the federal government should not use its dollars to intrude on a poor woman's decision whether to carry to term or to terminate her pregnancy and selectively withhold benefits because she seeks to exercise her right of reproductive choice in a manner the government disfavors."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@angelshoulders Exactly! They will purposely seek out the pro-life amongst us and force us to pay for the abortions of lazy welfare queens. Because those devious Satan worshipping Democrats love nothing more than making us poor pro-lifers take care of immoral women suckling at the teat of the state.
People say \"If it jeapordizes the woman's health\" But if you read the fine print, you'll learn that the governments defines the woman's health as mental health, physical health, spiritual health, emotional health, etc.
So If she simply sees the baby as an inconvenience, she could claim that it will effect her \"mental health\" and have a partial birth aborition without any further questions.
On the campaign trail, both Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee spoke about aborted fetuses "crying" in pain as doctors cast them aside into a heap. Suffice to say, such scenes are absent from the annals of medical literature. Dilation and extraction is such a rare operation that most hospitals won't perform one in a year. Such rhetoric is not only divorced from reality, but deeply disrespectful to the many caring medical professionals who perform abortions because they are committed to serving women.
In addition to imposing mandates on private employers& insurers,Obama&many congressional Democratic leaders also want all Americans to have the choice of enlisting in a health plan run entirely by the government. Obama consistently has opposed(as an Illinois state senator, U.S. senator,& presidential candidate)all limits on the funding of abortions in Medicaid&other government-run health programs.
As accusations that "Barack Obama is the most extreme pro-abortion candidate ever on a national ticket" reverberate around the conservative and anti-choice blogosphere, the Senator's pro-prevention, pro-education policies get scant attention - while his support for the Freedom of Choice Act and his opposition to the Hyde Amendment come in for fierce derision.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The number of federal government "bailouts" of private businesses over the past year is bad enough - but forcing American citizens to finance the abortion industry under the guise of "health care" cannot be accepted. The taking of human life is not health care. That's why Americans United for Life is fighting back against abortion lobbyists in the U.S. Senate
Studies have repeatedly shown that Hyde pushes women to have later, less safe and more expensive abortions rather than to forego abortion altogether; poor women take up to three weeks longer than other women to access abortion care. "[T]he risk of complications increases exponentially at higher gestations, so many poor women become trapped in a vicious cycle in which their difficulties are exacerbated and their health risks increased,"
There is a ob/gyn Dr. here on trial. During a C-section,he cut too deep &sliced the baby's cheek open.The parents & nurses were horrified! It required 41 stitches to repair. The prosecuting attorneys say,"Gross negligence,the child is scarred for life".The defense says,"At the time of the injury,the child was not born yet,legally not a person w/rights.I wonder how the jury will vote?
@angelshoulders - C-sections are at an all time high (at 29%) & one of the (many) risks include the newborn being cut or nicked during the incision (1 to 2 babies per 100 will be cut during the surgery.) In not one case where the legal guardians/parents have had legal grounds to sue the hospital/doctor have the attorney(s) ever claimed that the newborn was not "a person w/ rights" - please feel free to reference the case where you claim this has happened. Thanks, in advance, for the information.
"When you deliver a baby" - either through labor or termination - "that is clearly not going to be viable, we knew 100 percent it would not survive, there are two courses you could take," explains Streicher. "You could wrap the baby up in a blanket, give him or her comfort care, let the parents hold the baby, say goodbye, and go through the grieving process. Or, if we were required to make survival efforts, the baby is whisked away by the high-risk pediatrician and tubes start going in.
The law [Public Law 107-207] established that in all federal laws and regulations, the words "person," "human being," "child," and "individual" include "every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development."
But Obama was far from the only state lawmaker who needed stronger assurances that these bills were not Trojan horses: Seven more bills related to "born-alive" failed in the General Assembly in 2004, and Obama had nothing to do with those bills. And in 2005, when Obama was in the U.S. Senate, a "born-alive" bill passed easily in Illinois when specific wording was added, over the objections of abortion-rights foes, saying it would not affect state law regarding abortion.
kcs..You said & I quote,"considering that the number of women who die from pregnancy/childbirth is vastly greater than the number of women who die from abortion". Then you said, "No such thing as "live birth" abortions... that is a make-believe phrase used to invoke emotional outbursts and as such" You have may stats on both of those lies, you are either misinformed, or just plain ignorant. Now, for NARAL's comments.
@angelshoulders - Feel free to do a li'l research... there is no such thing as "partial birth" abortion; I've never claimed that there is no such thing as "abortion" because that would just be crazy-talk. NARAL is well aware of medical terminology my friend, even if you're not... I repeat, there is no such thing as "partial birth" abortion... this term was coined to invoke emotion and was vague enough to encompass various medical procedures including the IDX and some D&E abortions.
The 2002 law and today's actions by the agency were both badly needed, because there are those in our society who have convinced themselves that some newborn infants -- particularly those born alive during abortions, or with handicaps -- are not really legal persons.
@angelshoulders - Again, check your facts... there have always been laws which protect newborns, according to the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) Steering Committee "at the time of delivery... the medical condition & prognosis of any newly born infant should be assessed. At that point decisions about withholding or discontinuing medical treatment that is considered futile may be considered by... providers in conjunction with the parents acting in the best interest of their child."
Diana Lopez, age 25, was 19 weeks pregnant when she went to a Planned Parenthood for a SAFE & LEGAL abortion on February 28, 2002. She was 19 weeks pregnant.Before the day was over, Diana had bled to death. She left two sons, 4-year-old Frankie and 2-year-old Fabian, motherless. The taxpayers of California paid for the fatal abortion, courtesy of Medi-Cal.
your an idiot. You can also get ovaria cancer from standing in front of a microwave, did you knwo that? there have been proven "links" But the over all research PROVES those "links" are not enough to make that statement true. Read a book once ina while.
There are way to many unwanted babys in the world already suffering, i dont need to add to it. Do you have a point? Or do you like acting like an idiot?
she just acts like an idiot, and trust me if you look at many of her posts she really believes that women have some kind of magical power to just go "poof" and make a baby. and that they all want to be pregnant.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
On December 8, 1994, 23-year-old Magdalena went to Suresh Gandotra's clinic, El Norte Clinica Medica, for what she thought was a SAFE, LEGAL second-trimester abortion. Gandotra later said, "I knew I screwed up," when he pulled out bowel instead of fetal parts.
lamb....do the research. There have been many deaths linked to abortion and complications from botched abortions. Not to mention the live birth abortions, which NARAL did not even approve of.
@angelshoulders - No such thing as "live birth" abortions... that is a make-believe phrase used to invoke emotional outbursts and as such, NARAL did no such thing regarding this pretend procedure. See, NARAL sticks with factual information (imagine that?) perhaps you may wish to give that novel idea a go, eh?
kcs...More you ask for?When the pregnancy is too far along to do a traditional abortion. Labor is induced and the baby's heartbeat is monitored. Then before delivery (yes, you have to deliver the baby), the oxygen is cut off and the baby essentially suffocates. Once no heartbeat is detected, the baby is delivered. You then will be able to see the baby who's life you ended. This would a difficult thing to do and many hospitals will not do it
@angelshoulders... more, you ask for? But existing law clearly requires doctors to provide medical care in the unlikely event that a viable fetus was born as a result of an abortion procedure. "Nothing in BAIPA addressed this situation in some way that wasn't already covered," explains Mary Dixon, legislative director at the ACLU of Illinois. In any such instance, the law stipulates that the child receive medical care by pediatric specialist to maximize chances of survival.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Throughout his political career as an Illinois state senator& as a U.S. senator,Obama was a strong supporter of the entire agenda of the pro-abortion lobby. He led the opposition even to bills that won support from many other pro-abortion lawmakers,such as the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act&the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act.
These places are fakes!! They didn't help at all.They force only the option of adoption agencies and will go as far as calling CPS(child's protective services) on the women,to help aid adoption agencies to collect more infants.People never ever trust The pregnancy crisis centers they are fetus snatchers.
ashatbulaparanormal 3 weeks ago
Wow, this video is so bias it's not even funny. The fact that anyone would choose to purposely end the life of an unborn child, because it's convenient for them, because it's their "choice", is abominable . What "right" does anyone have to make the decision for the unborn child? I bet if you asked the baby, he/she would chose life always.
hiccup86 1 month ago
@hiccup86 What right does another person have to force another person into giving up the fetus they do want? But force you to keep one(terminally ill fetus) you don't want?
ashatbulaparanormal 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Christians are not supposed to lie. If they are really run by churches, they are running lies. That is against God.
devilslayer888 3 months ago
It is so scary to me that a t a time when a young woman has to make a big decision for herself, that she might get WRONG medical information. How can these centers not get in trouble for giving out wrong info?
tra1215 4 months ago
Wonderful video. These "crisis pregnancy centers" run by religious groups hand out lies and misinformation to women and should all be shut down. It would be more helpful to spend our tax dollars on preventing pregnancy, with cheap and easy access contraception.
ssbf1095 4 months ago 3
For those of you who want to prove this video wrong, how about posting some viable, unbiased links that can show your "statistics"?
TheKNexWeasel 6 months ago
Thanks to all the brave young women and men who created this video. It's horrifying to watch the anti-choice community systematically chip away at our harn-won rights. How can the Federal Government cut funding to education and give money to these monsters? Enough is enough.
susanoconnell777 7 months ago
I don't whether CPCs give out false information. I'm pro-life and my opinion about abortion isn't based on the information that CPCs give out.
NLCA1987 8 months ago
CPCs overwhelmingly DO NOT lie about the effects of abortion. The link between abortion and increased risk of breast cancer is well-established. Only one published study has found no link; a couple dozen have confirmed the link. Plus, while it often takes years or decades to show up, the risk of depression, suicide, substance abuse, etc., is FAR higher among post-abortion women than the general population. Stop lying, NARAL, NOW, NAF, and Planned Parenthood!
scragsma 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@scragsma
"abortion and increased risk of breast cancer" prove it.
"the risk of depression, suicide, substance abuse" prove that too.
when you are already i have the links to counter your claim.
FREEAMERICANOW69 9 months ago
WOW! I can't believe this information...I can't believe they would actually put these lies into this video. All you have to do is a little research and you can find out for yourself that the information that the CPC puts out IS ACCURATE.
30tannis 9 months ago
what is this? not the content but the video itself; it looks extremely well done for just youtube (other than the obvious org that is behind the video) but for a documentary or expose
nailo1 9 months ago
This video is bloody brilliant.
Sqirril 10 months ago
I am so glad to see these places getting busted for the disgusting misinformation they provide on a daily basis. Why isn't more work being done to strip federal funding from crazy zealous organizations like these? I have always greatly appreciated the personal, private, medically-accurate care I received from Planned Parenthood when I was too embarrassed to go to my mother and ask "what's wrong with me?"
OrionsChild 1 year ago
White people who run these death cults never make the case FOR abortion as in: we advocate the abortion because....they only attack and undermind the choice of life. If you undermine our natural inclination to choose life, then ka-ching goes the unPlanned Parenthood cash register.
Cmsgret 1 year ago
@Cmsgret This is ridiculous. I fully support the choice to have a child. I also fully support the right to terminate a pregnancy. I've known plenty of mothers and pregnant women who show up at pro-choice rallies. I've never heard of anyone advocating for abortion for the unwilling. But the "pro-life" people want to force women to endure pregnancy and childbirth, whether they want to or not!
SexySadie98506 1 year ago
i really don't know why people are arguing about the stupid facts. i don't care if an abortion clinic offered services to a pimp and an underage girl. i don't care if abortion is connected to cancer.
i care that with every abortion, a doctor is committing murder and getting away with it. i don't get how people can be okay with abortion. if i went into a pregnant panda right now, and ripped out her young baby, PETA and the rest of the world would be giving me death threats. human life matters.
poserrkids 1 year ago
@poserrkids It's not murder. It's not a person yet.
sparkylovesmangos 1 year ago 2
@sparkylovesmangos okay. i'm going to start performing panda abortions. it's okay though. it's not a panda yet.
poserrkids 10 months ago
@poserrkids No, it's not a panda yet, and if there were more than about 4,000 total left worldwide and there wasen't an extensive and expensive conservation effort to increase their numbers, I really wouldn't care what you aborted.
Abortions are about not wanting a baby. Panda babies are not only wanted but their is a lot of money spent trying to make them. So your arguement sucks.
sparkylovesmangos 9 months ago
The abortion industry is pointing a finger at others for presenting inaccurate health facts and statistics?
I have heard everything now. Two words: breast cancer.
OneCatholic 1 year ago
@OneCatholic
The Cross Cancer Institute and The World Health Organization both say that there is NO link between breast cancer and abortion.
PeanutButterBlood 1 year ago
@PeanutButterBlood Yup. And both are financially reliant on the abortion industry. Ever take a Critical Thinking class? Let's look at health organizations which do not offer abortions ... what do they say?
- The Polycarp Research Institute of PA: Abortion = breast cancer
- MaterCare International of Canada: Abortion = breast cancer
- Breast Cancer Prevention Institute of NY: Abortion = breast cancer
- National Physicians Center for Family Resources of AL: Abortion = breast cancer
OneCatholic 1 year ago
@PeanutButterBlood World Health Organization has declared birth control pills as a Class One carcinogen. National Cancer Institute admitted induced abortion elevates breast cancer risk by 40%. If you want to see the written admission, I can send you the link. More info:
abortionbreastcancer (dot) com
abortionbreastcancer (dot) ca
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian Absolutely everything you say is complete bullshit. Just letting you know.
sparkylovesmangos 1 year ago 2
@sparkylovesmangos
Watch YouTube video title, "Planned Parenthood Aids Pimp's Underage Sex Ring"
This video exposes the evil work of Planned Parenthood & how they help cover up prostitution of underage girls"
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian Oh, hello you. Spouting the same old nonsense, are we?
mediamatters (dot) org/blog/201102010014
I am sure I'm not the only one who sees the irony in an organization calling themselves "Live Action" and then admitting they heavily edit their videos before release. They actually ended up exposing the complete opposite.
NinthEuphoric 1 year ago 2
@ProLifeChristian Yeah I did watch them, and they didn't show anything. The people offered them medical care, then called authorities to report the incident. No wrong-doing, just tired conservative tactics to try to discredit a reputable organization.
sparkylovesmangos 1 year ago 2
@sparkylovesmangos Search "Planned Parenthood Live Action" on YouTube or google "Live Action (dot) org" You will see tons of videos of many Planned Parenthood clinics caught on tape aiding & abetting sex trafficking & rape of underage age girls. Not just one video but multiple videos of PP staff aiding & abetting of underage teen prostitution. Nobody forced PP staff to break the law...they willingly choose to do so. PP got caught & tried to back-pedal by reporting if to govt after the fact
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian Wrong. Like I said before, everything you say is incorrect and biased.
sparkylovesmangos 1 year ago
@sparkylovesmangos Planned Parenthood is now under investigation by government. Pro-choice supporters are desperately to deny. Full length videos & unedited videos have been turned over to the government. U.S. Congress is now starting the motion to de-fund Planned Parenthood. Why should U.S. taxpayers subsidize an organization that has been caught aiding & abetting teen prostitution? Planned Parenthood could have called the police on the spot....but they didn't...it's their own fault
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian What branch of government is investigating Planned Parenthood? Would it be the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which Planned Parenthood called after people PRETENDING to be pimps and whore (WHAT WEIRDOS!!) showed up at their offices telling a bunch of lies? BTW, the Pence Amendment will never pass the Senate.
SexySadie98506 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian Search "underage sex ring" and a Live Action video pops right up! Those kids have got sleazy sex on the brain!
SexySadie98506 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian That's a lie. The NCI has asserted exactly the opposite: that there is no relationship between abortion and breast cancer. Check out cancer dot gov
pennieroyaltea 1 year ago 2
@ProLifeChristian
Hahah! Are you the same person who told me I should take a critical thinking class? Yet, you direct me to two websites which have an obvious bias? Methinks someone should take their own advice.
PeanutButterBlood 11 months ago
@PeanutButterBlood No, I am not the person who told you to enroll in a critical thinking class. Please double check your Inbox & you'll find that is was somebody else.
ProLifeChristian 11 months ago
I went to crisis center before planned parenthood and instead of counsling me they shoved religion down my throat and spoke to me in a manner that was meant to degrade and make me feel guilt. I went to planned parenthood after leaving in the middle of there "counseling" because i didn't appreciate being told i'm going to hell when i do not believe in such a place. i am emotionally sound, have no scarring inside. 100% fine...so tell me again...abortion hurts women? or it hurts YOUR morals?
lambchopclmt 1 year ago
A report covers both of a story. This is a simple, one-sided college-aged editorial piece. NOT a "special report."
poetentate 1 year ago
The Christians are lying and scaring to get what they want, once again.
TheLonelyImmortal 1 year ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
To see actual abortion videos & witness the sheer brutality & violence imposed on the unborn baby during an abortion, type this into your search engine.
1) abortioninstruments
2) abortionNo
The above will lead you to websites that contain abortion videos that graphically expose the horrific cruelty of abortion on the innocent & voiceless unborn child.
Type in abort73 to see a video revealing how 1st trimester aborted babies are fully formed babies that look human not "a blob of tissue"
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons published a study titled, "The Breast Cancer Epidemic." It showed that, among seven risk factors, abortion is the "best predictor of breast cancer," and fertility is also a useful predictor. (23 Oct 2007)
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
If anybody wants to review an entire 10 pg report from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research & National Cancer Institute that concludes oral contraceptive & induced abortion is associated with elevated breast cancer risk, pls let me know
I can send you a link to the report published in Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention Journal 09: 18 (4) Apr 09
At top of left column on pg 1163 from line 3 - 5:
"Induced abortion & oral contraceptive use were associated with an increased risk for breast cancer"
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Many women have died from legal abortion. Google "Blackmun Wall" for a listing of the women killed by legal abortions & the circumstances of their death. It is is named after Harry Blackmun, the Supreme Court justice who wrote the Roe v. Wade decision & launched America's abortion Holocaust
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
Comment removed
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
National Cancer Institute held a workshop (2003) that concluded abortion does not increase risk of breast cancer. Here is what the National Cancer Institute (NCI) doesn't tell you: Planned Parenthood (USA's largest abortion provider) has been reported to donate millions of dollars to NCI. Thus, NCI relies on abortion money to fund their research & thus an incentive for bias research exists. It is believed salaries of cancer researchers come from abortion money . Obvious conflict of interest
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
More about the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) conference that concluded no link between abortion & breast cancer. Dr. L. Brinton, a leading NCI researcher, neglected to tell you the following on the NCI website: Scientists who did indeed find links between abortion & elevated risk of breast cancer were deliberately not allowed to present their data & research at the 2003 conference. Only doctors who found no link between abortion & breast cancer were allowed to present their papers
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
Breast cancer studies in China & Turkey (2009) reported significant elevated breast cancer risk in women with abortions
Turkish breast cancer study published in World J of Surg Oncology 2009;7:37
China breast cancer study by Humana Press, online publication Sept 2009
Many US breast cancer studies depend on funding from National Cancer Institute. NCI relies on funding from abortionists & pro-abortion US Representatives in government. Thus NCI is under pressure to conceal abortion-cancer link
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
Many scientists conclude abortion is associated with elevated breast cancer risk:
Dr Joel Brind, Prof Biology/Endocrinology Baruch College
Dr Angela Lanfranchi, Prof of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Med School
Dr Janet Daling & J Dolle, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
Dr John Thorpe, Epidemiologist, University of North Carolina
Dr Holly Howe, NY State Dept of Health
Dr Leon Bradlow, Director Strang Cornell Cancer Research
Dr Joseph Frank, UC Irvine Medical School
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
if you lied and say abortion is MURDERING A BABY-- yeah, i can see that.
babies are born, MURDER IS ILLEGAL.
and their god is fake, the bible supports abortion.
FREEAMERICANOW69 1 year ago
I forgot to say that we do provide diapers, formula, clothing and other products to people who need them. However no one reported this on this video.
tgirll 1 year ago
@tgirll
irrelevant to the lies supported by tax payers.
FREEAMERICANOW69 1 year ago
@tgirll What a help. I'm sure that all those things will last at least a week, which really makes a difference when we are talking about a 18+ year commitment.
CanadianQueer 1 year ago
This is so sad. I volunteer at one of these and this is taken to the extreme. I can't speak from evey center, but it's not this way. It's a resource center. The pregnancy tests we give the client does the testing. We let them read the results and have them say negative or positive. We provide info on all methods; abortion, adoption planning or keeping the child. We never claim to be medical professional and refer people to actual medical professionals. This makes my heart sad.
tgirll 1 year ago
Will someone please tell the genius in this propaganda film that there is a BIG DIFFERENCE between an RN and an NP. And did they REALLY need to bring in the transvestite from the ACLU? Oh, and why is it NOT ok to use taxpayer $ to stop baby killing but you could use it TO kill babies BY FUNDING PP? You people are freakin' brainwashed zombies. Seriously, wake up and smell the MURDER that abortion is. One day you will be held accountable for NOT doing anything....
threebabyms 1 year ago
@threebabyms
yeah, babies are BORN.
killing them is illegal, so abortion doesn't kill babies and tax dollars doesn't go towards abortion.
abortion is not murder.
murder is the UNlawful killing of a human being, abortion is legal and constitutionally supported.
and read NIV's footnotes of number's 5 : 11-31 because your bible supports abortion.
FREEAMERICANOW69 1 year ago
@FREEAMERICANOW69 The state of CA's tax payers paid $52 billion to MediCal that was directly spent on abortions for women who have MediCal.What is constitutionally supported is the right to LIFE.Science has CLEARLY proven that at conception,a seperate HUMAN BEING is present with SEPERATE DNA than the parents. Abortion is the destruction and MURDER of a HUMAN BEING, and is legal because it is a BILLION $ industry. Alsp, PP get's BILLIONS in tax $ and is the #1 abortion provider in the nation.
threebabyms 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@threebabyms
wikipedia org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment
but cali is court-ordered to pay for abortions.
most states do not pay for them.
wrong, 14th amendment said that no state can't take a person's LIFE away w/o due process---a fetus is not clearly a person, since it's a BIO-parasite to the woman's body and how would it receive due process for life against the woman's will and due process for liberty, anyways?
dna doesn't mean SHIT, when it;s inside her body.
abortion is NOT murder
FREEAMERICANOW69 1 year ago
@three
abortion is NOT murder.
Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with "malice aforethought". ABORTION is legal and supported by the constitution (13th and 14th amendment) for a woman and her reproductive rights.
Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo, resulting in or caused by its death.
abortion been legal BEFORE RvW...i suggest you do your homework and STOP listening to pro-life fascists propaganda
FREEAMERICANOW69 1 year ago 2
@threebabyms Way to be transphobic. As for taxpayer dollars, the problem lies in the fact that abortion is legal, whereas using government money to facilitate your desire to proselytize is not. Abortion is not murder; murder is the UNLAWFUL killing of a human being, and abortion is legal, whether you like it or not. And by brainwashed zombies you mean "people who hold an opinion that I don't agree with".
CanadianQueer 1 year ago
Sepreation of church & state is like the equator. You cant really see it but you know its there & documented; but its crossed all the time, everyday & usually for money.And the thing with PAS is one-sided, the crisis center does'nt amit is that the only women that get PAS were those that either 1) didnt want to get an abortion because the preg. was wanted but had to for medical reason or 2) were unsure/did'nt quite make up their minds in the first place.
The PAS argument is a guilt-tripping lie
Kayleahful 1 year ago
@EspressoFan4Life no it isn't. because you attack the tone of the narrator's voice rather than refute facts. that makes you look not very smart. if your side didn't practice deception, bunk information and in many cases murder you wouldn't sound like an idiot.
mwells219 1 year ago
@EspressoFan4Life the fact that you have to insult the voice of the person speaking rather than attack the actual information presented doesn't help your cause and makes you look like an idiot.
mwells219 1 year ago
Great points, @Ophelia734 ! One of the "pro-life" champions, Garry Bauer was asked on CSpan if he and his wife would adopt any unwanted children (to save them from abortion). His reply was "We already have children, so we don't want to deny the many parents trying to adopt their opportunity." How unselfish!!!
So why are so many unwanted children staying in foster care until they are thrown out on their own at age 18?!?!?
Rayosun 1 year ago
P.S. to the post about Gary Bauer: We "pro-choicers" are experts on the adoption of unwanted children in America, in part because we have adopted 5 of our own after raising our first five.
Rayosun 1 year ago
@EspressoFan4Life,
Anybody who uses "some nasal, effeminate idiot narrate all of these 'facts' in feigned outrage simply isn't impressive." as their basis for determining what is "solid journalism" obvious has a solid scientific background, NOT !
Rayosun 1 year ago
@Rayosun yeah they have jesus son of invisible sky man, they don't need your stinking facts.
mwells219 1 year ago
@EspressoFan4Life, "anecdotal evidence"? "anecdotal evidence"? The Roman Catholic Church is based on nothing but a mountain of "anecdotal evidence".
If there were women in the leadership of the R.C. Church, they would understand why not every pregnancy should progress all the way to delivery, but the reasoin they don't is that "Jesus didn't choose any women to be priests". Wow what persuasive "anecdotal evidence" !!! Google "JesusWouldBeFurious" for much more.
Rayosun 1 year ago
I know a woman who has struggled with breast cancer for 6 years as a direct result of taking the morning after pill(a form of abortion). The morning after and 'birth control' both contain high estrogen doses and any doctor will put money on you getting cancer if you use them regularly.
harrygoonix 1 year ago
@harrygoonix How do you know it was "a direct result of taking the morning after pill"? Do you have psychic abilities? I can tell you that no doctors would "put money on" anyone getting cancer from that medicine. That is an absolute misunderstanding.
northwhale 1 year ago 2
@northwhale Scientists studying breast cancer in China & Turkey who do not rely on pro-abortion politicians for funding reported in 2009 that there is indeed significant elevated breast cancer risk in women with abortions:
Turkish breast cancer study. Citation: Ozmen et al. Breast cancer risk factors in Turkish women. Published in World Journal of Surgery Oncology 2009;7:37
China breast cancer study by Humana Press, online publication Sept 09
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian
Bull.
Every single woman I know who's had/has breast cancer has never aborted.
ashtonsmama020206 1 year ago
@ashtonsmama020206 How do you know for a fact that the women you know with breast cancer have never had an abortion? Many women will not admit they have had an abortion. Also, abortion is just one factor that causes breast cancer. There are many other risk factors that elevate breast cancer risk - excessive weight gain & alcohol intake, lack of exercise, unhealthy diet, never having given birth, not breastfeeding, 2nd trimester miscarriage.
For info, visit abortionbreastcancer (dot) com
ProLifeChristian 1 year ago
@ProLifeChristian You are displaying a poor knowledge of breast cancer risk factors. Here's an ACCURATE list: age (a woman’s chances of getting breast cancer increase as she gets older), a family history of breast cancer, an early age at first menstrual period, a late age at menopause, a late age at the time of birth of her first full-term baby, and certain breast conditions. Obesity is also a risk factor for breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
pennieroyaltea 1 year ago
@harrygoonix Firstly, the morning after pill isn't a form of abortion. It prevents pregnancy, just as normal birth control does, except it is a higher dosage of hormones. Secondly, there is no medical(factual) evidence that the morning after pill causes breast cancer. In fact, health organizations have stated that abortions do not lead to breast cancer risk at all. You, sir, are severely uneducated and probably a conservative Christian.
seewhatjordansees 1 year ago
@harrygoonix Harry you're a perfect illustration of what is WRONG with pro-lifers:
" I know a woman who has struggled with breast cancer for 6 years as a direct result of taking the morning after pil"
I hope you're only a fundamentalitst mouthpiece, and nit a fundamentalitst DOCTOR who "knows" such non-existent connections!
Rayosun 1 year ago
I wonder how Jesus Christ would feel about your characterization of the poor as "lazy welfare queens". I'm fairly sure it's not very christian-like to hate sinners, instead of just hating the sin.
socialmarketing 1 year ago 2
@angelshoulders - I've never given anyone a website to check into the abuse of foster homes... I've never researched those types of stats.
kcsorci 2 years ago
kcsorci..my mistake.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A video accusing of passing misinformation uses "Rachel" to pass misinformation. Rachel, you could have had all those things you said you wanted & given the child up for adoption. Why vid never asked her about adoption?
Megan, is it possible the pregnancy test was botched and the boogie man preg center was not out to "mislead" you? Doctors and abortionists make errors too. Do they have ulterior motives too?
To do an abortion seems medically relevant, and so is going to term and delivering life.
kamiller42 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This video wants to talk about inaccurate
information then let's talk about the abortion clinics. Abortion is murder not
a safe and common surgical procedure. Abortion is murder not healthcare. Abortion is murder not a reproductive right. Abortion is murder and yet all
abortion clinics LIE about that. Talk
about inaccurate. Repent and stop
promoting murder.
2000yrCatholic 2 years ago
@2000yrCatholic How 'bout we try some factual information, shall we? Abortion is the termination of ones pregnancy and per the CDC, it is one of the most common and yes, *safest* surgical procedures performed in the US. You can call any clinic who provides this service for women and you will find that they will absolutely give this basic factual information. Facts... you know, objective reality... something which is not up for debate (psst, what you're going on about is merely your opinion)
kcsorci 2 years ago
On March 1, 1989, Erica Richardson, a 16-year-old Maryland resident, bled to death from a punctured uterus only hours after undergoing a LEGAL abortion. During the next five months, two adult women, Gladys Estanislao and Debra Gray, also died from abortion complications. They too were residents of Maryland.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
your name is 2000yrcatholic, i would think, as i did, after just reading your name no one bothered to read what you wrote.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
@2000yrCatholic, If abortion is murder, then prosecute the murderers. In the U.S.A., legislators and courts -NOT bishops - define crimes. Do you know the difference between the U.S.A. and the Vatican? Our legisltors and courts know criminal sexual abuse of innocent children. Your pope and bishops have demonstrated how INFERIOIR they are to our legisltors and courts, so why are you so impressed with the teaching of your leacherous priests & short-sighted bishops?!?!
Rayosun 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Choice USA, an activist, abortion-promoting group, claims that women must be informed about their safe and legal reproductive health choices. They say these choices include abstinence, contraception, abortion, adoption, and parenthood. If you take a closer look at America, however, you begin to see that this same pro-choice movement has basically eliminated abstinence, adoption, and parenthood from a womans list of options"
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Carolina Gutierrez died six weeks after her safe and LEGAL abortion. An infection set in from her perforated (cut) uterus. Her gangrenous legs were amputated during that time in an effort to save her life, but she did not survive.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
I would like to see your source for the bold claim that money is going to these CPC's. They are run on donations & are charitable organizations. If you can prove this claim, it would make this vid credible!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders Public federal funding of CPC's began in 1996 when the federal welfare reform law allocated $50 million to Title V abstinence-only education programs, including CPC's. Now, direct funding of CPC's began in 2000 under the 'Special Projects of Regional Significance Program' (via the maternal and child health block grant) in 2002 $6 million went directly to CPC's (info obtained from SIECUS: Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States)
kcsorci 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Edrica is the third known death among Planned Parenthood patients in California in the last four years. Holly Patterson, 18, died of an infection after a LEGAL DOSE OF THE SAFE DRUG, RU-486 abortion in 2003.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - In 2005, 536,000 women died of maternal causes... please tell me that you are not suggesting that we outlaw gestation due to these numbers. You are aware that every surgery poses a certain risk, are you not? Incidentally, there are about 7,600 deaths due to non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs -such as aspirin- per year & yet, those are still safe & legal (imagine that.) It's nice that we allow people to weigh the risks prior to taking/undergoing any medical drug/procedure.
kcsorci 2 years ago
love how she didnt respond to you. guess she doesnt like it when someone proves her wrong.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
@lambchopclmt - I know, right? I still cannot comprehend how some people can keep the blinders on, no matter how much truth is tossed their way.
kcsorci 2 years ago
The American Medical Association is responsible for the extermination of millions, upon millions, upon millions of human beings. They are doing in under the guise of a medical procedure and they are expoliting women in order to profit from the extermination of these human beings. Any person who says it's a "woman's choice" has bought into the propaganda of blaming women for the extermination of these humans beings.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Obmam believes in partial birth abortions&infanticide,allowing a baby from an induced labor abortion to die without treatment.He voted against the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. He was the only state senator to speak against this law on the floor of the Illinois Senate. We are not talking about a"fetus" in the womb.This bill was solely to protect LIVE BORN BABIES!The Born Alive Infant Protection Act was legislation that would require hospitals to care for infants who survive an abortion.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
As a state senator, Obama saw BAIPA for what it was: an ideologically-motivated ploy to vilify women and doctors who choose abortion. On the state Senate floor on April 4, 2002, he explained, "This issue ultimately is about abortion and not live births. Because if there are children being born alive, I, at least, have confidence that a doctor who is in that room is going to make sure that they're looked after."
kcsorci 2 years ago
kcs...The eVIDANCE suggest that America has indeed chosen a president Who Doesnt Mind Murdering Helpless Infants,though He sure seems to talk about"change",without mentioning the changes he plans to make.Obama thinks that human life is something which can be taken away by the majority,if the majority doesnt want that life around.Since there is no lawful penalty upon that life,allowing it TO be taken from them LEGALLY. Grammatically this would IN FACT be known as MURDER, or at best MANSLAUGHTER
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - the evidence suggests that America has chosen a president who trusts our medical community and the policies it puts forth in order to protect all people. Oh, that and that America was ready for a change from the status quo of politics in general. By the way, murder is the intentional killing of a person by a sane person with intent, malice aforethought and no legal reason... you do not get to alter the meanings of words in order to suit your agenda.
kcsorci 2 years ago
Equally troubling is the fact that the law Obama opposed would have required doctors to make efforts at life-saving for any infant that shows a "sign of life" even when there was no chance the baby would survive, a practice that Dr. Lauren Streicher, an obstetrician at Northwestern Medical Hospital who often delivers pre-term babies who will not survive, refers to as "torture."
kcsorci 2 years ago
The law also defines "born alive" as meaning "the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion."
angelshoulders 2 years ago
The feeling of the majority was that the bill (even as amended) still created great uncertainty about whether it would compromise abortion rights. It looked like yet another case of advocates trying to inject politics into the practice of medicine; we saw a desire to keep those those key questions (about abortion rights) unclear.
kcsorci 2 years ago
Obama spoke against the legislation in 2001 and 2002 and single-handedly defeated it in committee in 2003.
Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. Sponsored bill providing contraceptives at taxpayers expense. Babies who survive their abortions are not protected by the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
But BAIPA isn't really about protecting infants; it is anti-abortion rights legislation crafted by the hard right. BAIPA targets the abortion procedure known as dilation and extraction, which anti-choicers have so successfully re-branded as "partial birth abortion." Dilation and extraction accounts for less than one-fifth of one percent of all American abortions, and is used most often to end wanted pregnancies in which expectant parents learn their baby will not be viable outside of the womb.
kcsorci 2 years ago
Wait one minute kcs...did you not qualify a baby's first breath as when his/her life begins? Wow, you best be watching those botched abortions that deliver livning breathing human beings
!!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - Please do feel free to reference the quote, by me, in which I mention anything at all about a "baby's first breath" - until & unless you can, I must remind you that using misinformation or outright lies has never been an effective arguing tool. Tsk, tsk and all that.
kcsorci 2 years ago
In addition, BAIPA was riddled with provisions that alarmed both defenders of abortion rights and the mainstream medical community in Illinois, including the Illinois Hospital Association and the Illinois State Medical Society, both of which opposed the package of bills.
kcsorci 2 years ago
When he signed the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act on August 5, 2002, President Bush said, "This important legislation ensures that every infant born alive -- including an infant who survives an abortion procedure -- is considered a person under federal law." He added, "Today, through sonograms and other technology, we can see clearly that unborn children are members of the human family, as well."
angelshoulders 2 years ago
You dont have any point at all or an opinion of your own do you? You just spout of things that you copy and paste from other websites. It's so pathetic
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
@lambchopclmt - I've found that if you just give it back to her, she sort of loses her steam... what's good for the goose and all that.
kcsorci 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The researchers reported that the elevated rates of substance use among women who had abortions might be linked to higher levels of anxiety,depression,& unresolved grief which have been measured in other studies of women with a history of abortion.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
There is no such medical term as a "partial birth abortion." NPR has an excellent factual look at the D&X debate, noting that contrary to the claims of some abortion opponents, most such abortions do not take place in the third trimester of pregnancy, or after fetal "viability." Indeed, when some members of Congress tried to amend the bill to ban only those procedures that take place after viability, abortion opponents complained that would leave most of the procedures legal.
kcsorci 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The study found that among women who had unintended first pregnancies,those who had abortions were more likely to report more frequent & recent use of alcohol, marijuana, &cocaine
angelshoulders 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@angelshoulders Because those poor fornicating sinners have embraced Satan and not Jesus! They must be helped to cease all sexual and drug sins, so that they can devote the proper amount of time to mourning their dead baby (or babies) and trying to stop other women from being allowed to use their weak, Satan-influenced minds to decide to kill their babies.
MrsGWright 2 years ago
you dont much about the medical world do you?
If your worried about SAFE and LEGAL things that actually kill people i would stop taking asprin and any form of anti inflammatory.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
lamb....What are you talking about. I'm talking about women dying while undergoing a 'safe & legal" procedure to end the life of their baby, whom they indeed, helped to create! They die trying to kill their own baby. The baby had no way of avoiding his/her circumstances, the mother had all the 'choice' in that. But by her 'say' the child loses his/her LIFE! At what point do you believe a human life begins?
angelshoulders 2 years ago
please re read everything i wrote and if you are still confused go back to school.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
A ban to stop aborted babies from being shelved to die would be burdensome to their mothers. She alone should decide whether her baby lives or dies.
Aborting babies alive and letting them die is a doctor's prerogative.
Aborting babies alive and letting them die violates no universal principle.
Obama believes babies can be punishment.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - that is utter rubbish.
kcsorci 2 years ago
Congress had received testimony that some infants who had been born alive after unsuccessful abortions were left to die. We issued clear guidance that withholding medical care from an infant born alive may constitute a violation of the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act and the Medicare Conditions of Participation."
angelshoulders 2 years ago
The Neonatal Resuscitation Program Steering Committee coordinates, develops & implements edu. programs & materials that promote optimal care & resuscitation of newborns. Its the vision of the NRPSC to have every newborn in need of resuscitation effectively cared for by health care professionals & collaborates with relevant stakeholders, incl the Committee on Fetus & Newborn, Section on Perinatal Pediatrics, ACOG & & Canadian Pediatric Society
kcsorci 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - It's pretty telling how utterly silent you are when it comes to the number of women who die during pregnancy/childbirth? Particularly considering that the number of women who die from pregnancy/childbirth is vastly greater than the number of women who die from abortion. Heck, half a million women per year die trying to gestate/give birth to a baby; these poor women who lose their LIVES, why no concern for them? At what point do you believe the lives of women to be significant?
kcsorci 2 years ago
kcsorci....Where is your proof, source and statistics for that is a blatant lie. You expect us to believe that rubbish?!? You insult the utube readers. You want the truth, you can't handle the truth.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - You want proof that there is no such medical procedure as "partial birth" abortion? Do you have a medical dictionary? Look it up, dear. Yep, that's right... doesn't exist.
kcsorci 2 years ago
In a"wish list"memorandum signed by PPFA&over 60 other pro-abortion organizations&submitted to the Obama transition team in November 2008,the groups said,"It is imperative that the President put forward a health care reform plan that guarantees access to comprehensive,high-quality,affordable health care for all. . .Comprehensive benefits must include access to the full range of reproductive health services, including contraception, maternity care, & ABORTION care."
angelshoulders 2 years ago
President Obama believes "that the federal government should not use its dollars to intrude on a poor woman's decision whether to carry to term or to terminate her pregnancy and selectively withhold benefits because she seeks to exercise her right of reproductive choice in a manner the government disfavors."
kcsorci 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Every year, well over 1,000,000 children lose their lives through abortion in America. For decades, existing federal law has prohibited the use of taxpayer funds from paying for abortions. But now a radical change would take place if the Democrat's health care bill becomes law, our government would force pro-life taxpayers to pay for abortions.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
President Obama "believes that the federal government should not use its dollars to intrude on a poor woman's decision whether to carry to term or to terminate her pregnancy and selectively withhold benefits because she seeks to exercise her right of reproductive choice in a manner the government disfavors."
kcsorci 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@angelshoulders Exactly! They will purposely seek out the pro-life amongst us and force us to pay for the abortions of lazy welfare queens. Because those devious Satan worshipping Democrats love nothing more than making us poor pro-lifers take care of immoral women suckling at the teat of the state.
MrsGWright 2 years ago
People say \"If it jeapordizes the woman's health\" But if you read the fine print, you'll learn that the governments defines the woman's health as mental health, physical health, spiritual health, emotional health, etc.
So If she simply sees the baby as an inconvenience, she could claim that it will effect her \"mental health\" and have a partial birth aborition without any further questions.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
On the campaign trail, both Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee spoke about aborted fetuses "crying" in pain as doctors cast them aside into a heap. Suffice to say, such scenes are absent from the annals of medical literature. Dilation and extraction is such a rare operation that most hospitals won't perform one in a year. Such rhetoric is not only divorced from reality, but deeply disrespectful to the many caring medical professionals who perform abortions because they are committed to serving women.
kcsorci 2 years ago
In addition to imposing mandates on private employers& insurers,Obama&many congressional Democratic leaders also want all Americans to have the choice of enlisting in a health plan run entirely by the government. Obama consistently has opposed(as an Illinois state senator, U.S. senator,& presidential candidate)all limits on the funding of abortions in Medicaid&other government-run health programs.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
As accusations that "Barack Obama is the most extreme pro-abortion candidate ever on a national ticket" reverberate around the conservative and anti-choice blogosphere, the Senator's pro-prevention, pro-education policies get scant attention - while his support for the Freedom of Choice Act and his opposition to the Hyde Amendment come in for fierce derision.
kcsorci 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The number of federal government "bailouts" of private businesses over the past year is bad enough - but forcing American citizens to finance the abortion industry under the guise of "health care" cannot be accepted. The taking of human life is not health care. That's why Americans United for Life is fighting back against abortion lobbyists in the U.S. Senate
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Studies have repeatedly shown that Hyde pushes women to have later, less safe and more expensive abortions rather than to forego abortion altogether; poor women take up to three weeks longer than other women to access abortion care. "[T]he risk of complications increases exponentially at higher gestations, so many poor women become trapped in a vicious cycle in which their difficulties are exacerbated and their health risks increased,"
kcsorci 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a ob/gyn Dr. here on trial. During a C-section,he cut too deep &sliced the baby's cheek open.The parents & nurses were horrified! It required 41 stitches to repair. The prosecuting attorneys say,"Gross negligence,the child is scarred for life".The defense says,"At the time of the injury,the child was not born yet,legally not a person w/rights.I wonder how the jury will vote?
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - C-sections are at an all time high (at 29%) & one of the (many) risks include the newborn being cut or nicked during the incision (1 to 2 babies per 100 will be cut during the surgery.) In not one case where the legal guardians/parents have had legal grounds to sue the hospital/doctor have the attorney(s) ever claimed that the newborn was not "a person w/ rights" - please feel free to reference the case where you claim this has happened. Thanks, in advance, for the information.
kcsorci 2 years ago
"When you deliver a baby" - either through labor or termination - "that is clearly not going to be viable, we knew 100 percent it would not survive, there are two courses you could take," explains Streicher. "You could wrap the baby up in a blanket, give him or her comfort care, let the parents hold the baby, say goodbye, and go through the grieving process. Or, if we were required to make survival efforts, the baby is whisked away by the high-risk pediatrician and tubes start going in.
kcsorci 2 years ago
The law [Public Law 107-207] established that in all federal laws and regulations, the words "person," "human being," "child," and "individual" include "every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development."
angelshoulders 2 years ago
But Obama was far from the only state lawmaker who needed stronger assurances that these bills were not Trojan horses: Seven more bills related to "born-alive" failed in the General Assembly in 2004, and Obama had nothing to do with those bills. And in 2005, when Obama was in the U.S. Senate, a "born-alive" bill passed easily in Illinois when specific wording was added, over the objections of abortion-rights foes, saying it would not affect state law regarding abortion.
kcsorci 2 years ago
kcs..You said & I quote,"considering that the number of women who die from pregnancy/childbirth is vastly greater than the number of women who die from abortion". Then you said, "No such thing as "live birth" abortions... that is a make-believe phrase used to invoke emotional outbursts and as such" You have may stats on both of those lies, you are either misinformed, or just plain ignorant. Now, for NARAL's comments.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - Feel free to do a li'l research... there is no such thing as "partial birth" abortion; I've never claimed that there is no such thing as "abortion" because that would just be crazy-talk. NARAL is well aware of medical terminology my friend, even if you're not... I repeat, there is no such thing as "partial birth" abortion... this term was coined to invoke emotion and was vague enough to encompass various medical procedures including the IDX and some D&E abortions.
kcsorci 2 years ago 2
The 2002 law and today's actions by the agency were both badly needed, because there are those in our society who have convinced themselves that some newborn infants -- particularly those born alive during abortions, or with handicaps -- are not really legal persons.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - Again, check your facts... there have always been laws which protect newborns, according to the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) Steering Committee "at the time of delivery... the medical condition & prognosis of any newly born infant should be assessed. At that point decisions about withholding or discontinuing medical treatment that is considered futile may be considered by... providers in conjunction with the parents acting in the best interest of their child."
kcsorci 2 years ago 2
Diana Lopez, age 25, was 19 weeks pregnant when she went to a Planned Parenthood for a SAFE & LEGAL abortion on February 28, 2002. She was 19 weeks pregnant.Before the day was over, Diana had bled to death. She left two sons, 4-year-old Frankie and 2-year-old Fabian, motherless. The taxpayers of California paid for the fatal abortion, courtesy of Medi-Cal.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
your an idiot. You can also get ovaria cancer from standing in front of a microwave, did you knwo that? there have been proven "links" But the over all research PROVES those "links" are not enough to make that statement true. Read a book once ina while.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
Well that justifies killing our own baby. The baby you helped to create.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
our? i'm fairly certain i never made a baby with you. Why exactly are you talking?
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
You must have made babies with sarakai & mixxycan then huh?!?
angelshoulders 2 years ago
I dont make babys thank you.
There are way to many unwanted babys in the world already suffering, i dont need to add to it. Do you have a point? Or do you like acting like an idiot?
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
she just acts like an idiot, and trust me if you look at many of her posts she really believes that women have some kind of magical power to just go "poof" and make a baby. and that they all want to be pregnant.
sarakai 2 years ago
Sounds like she's either crazy or a troll. *sigh* some people.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
i think a bit of both.
sarakai 2 years ago
i demand and insta kill troll button damn it! lol.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
On December 8, 1994, 23-year-old Magdalena went to Suresh Gandotra's clinic, El Norte Clinica Medica, for what she thought was a SAFE, LEGAL second-trimester abortion. Gandotra later said, "I knew I screwed up," when he pulled out bowel instead of fetal parts.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Do you have a point? Or are you just spouting off about RARE cases, that 1% of abortions go wrong.
lambchopclmt 2 years ago
lamb....do the research. There have been many deaths linked to abortion and complications from botched abortions. Not to mention the live birth abortions, which NARAL did not even approve of.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders - No such thing as "live birth" abortions... that is a make-believe phrase used to invoke emotional outbursts and as such, NARAL did no such thing regarding this pretend procedure. See, NARAL sticks with factual information (imagine that?) perhaps you may wish to give that novel idea a go, eh?
kcsorci 2 years ago 2
kcs...More you ask for?When the pregnancy is too far along to do a traditional abortion. Labor is induced and the baby's heartbeat is monitored. Then before delivery (yes, you have to deliver the baby), the oxygen is cut off and the baby essentially suffocates. Once no heartbeat is detected, the baby is delivered. You then will be able to see the baby who's life you ended. This would a difficult thing to do and many hospitals will not do it
angelshoulders 2 years ago
@angelshoulders... more, you ask for? But existing law clearly requires doctors to provide medical care in the unlikely event that a viable fetus was born as a result of an abortion procedure. "Nothing in BAIPA addressed this situation in some way that wasn't already covered," explains Mary Dixon, legislative director at the ACLU of Illinois. In any such instance, the law stipulates that the child receive medical care by pediatric specialist to maximize chances of survival.
kcsorci 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Throughout his political career as an Illinois state senator& as a U.S. senator,Obama was a strong supporter of the entire agenda of the pro-abortion lobby. He led the opposition even to bills that won support from many other pro-abortion lawmakers,such as the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act&the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act.
angelshoulders 2 years ago