Added: 3 years ago
From: wilberman
Views: 41,006
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Anyone else hear London Calling in the background? When did the clash play with the Stones?

  • that's the CLASH playing in the background!! turn the camera around! :D

  • MICK!!!!!!!!!!! YOU'RE SO SEXY!!! absolutely gorgeous here, as always, just the funniest personality, and as for the way he's like on stage........... HOT HOT HOT!!! don't care how old you are Mick, I will always love you <3

  • I remember when the STONES were in NORTH BROOKFIELD!! Check out Micks shirt!!

  • Age is just a number.For the record,he is still sexy at 70!! Who cares how old he is .Just stupid people.

  • Wowwwww the title of 'Let's Spend The Night Together' caused a scandal?

  • Bill Wyman is a pedo.

  • My school teacher gave me his ticket Stub to this very show.VH Opened, It was Rainy he said.

  • Wow, the distance between them and the audience doesn't do the Stones any favors. In fact it distills their music and MJ tries desperately to draw this massive crowd in. My impression is that the RS is essentially a group that worked best in an intimate environment with the band members (at least) within the same space. MJ just gets more and more removed from the other members.

  • Mick was 38.He was born in 1943.

  • he was 45 at the time.

  • keep your eyes open so u are not wasting your time (mick jagger)

  • billy wyman was thinking "fuck this shit i want to get back to my trailer for my birthday blowjob" i bet when bills cums in her mouth he yells "ive arrived"

  • Cocaine is a hell of a drug.

  • It´s the marijuana powers

    In 1969 Mick and Keith bought marijuana close to my house in Brasil

  • I LIKE THE WAY YOU MOVE!!!!

  • is "London Calling" playing in the background for the Wyman interview?

    Can you imagine seeing the Stones and the Clash at the same time?!!!? Who would be better? OMG!

  • I was just thinking the same thing! I know, it'd be amazing =)

  • I was at this show (only time I've seen the Stones) and it was Van Halen that opened for them. Must have been a recording of the Clash.

  • wow!

  • Great minds think alike! wow Mick can really pull off a pink suit!

  • mick is so beautiful! I don't know how people ever could think that he is unattractive! He has a very special personality, he can be very manly when he sings, or then he can be silly and even a little bit girly, (which i love!) I would do anything in the world to meet him.

  • @Heathledgerjoker1234 he ugly

    

  • Mick is so so so attractive guy, he has something special, his particular voice, hes movements, his extraodinary face, his lips, eyes, his smile, his very thin body and....well.... I love him, love him love him!

    I love the Rolling Stones

  • @Ladystarify Completely agreed! Sexy sexy man!

  • Haha, they all looked 40 when they were 28! But that's how it was then. We live in prettyboy and girly-girl times now, where everything is fake and phoney and digital and downloaded ...

  • He is in fact 38 here. But he still looks older than that here. Maybe it was the light!!!

    And it's true about ageing then and now. No botox then!!

  • @wilberman that means he is the same age as jagger?

  • @sashageyer95 Whose the same age as Jagger? If you mean Robin Denselow the interviewer, then he is around the same age, yes.

  • @wilberman wait did you sau bill wyman was 38 here?

  • @sashageyer95 Bill Wyman was celebrating his 45th birthday that day, but didn't like letting on about his true age in an era when being over 40 in pop music was not cool. He was about 6 or 7 years older than most of the band!

    He had in fact taken off 5 years off his age for most of the 60s!

  • @wilberman great facts and so true. 45 ? wow im 45 until next year. ha ha ha what an epic band. goose bumps these you tube gems are. i remember summer 1981 san francisco they played two shows @ candlestick park.my mom wouldnt let me go to concerts until the next year. the who farewell tour oct 1982 oakland ca. the indoor show that followed the day on the green concert with the clash. the indoor show no clash. just t bone barnett. terrible i migt add..........

  • @bosoxyaz8 I was at Candlestick Park on 10/18/81, it was my 21st birthday. The Stones ROCKED the HOUSE!!

    I also saw The Who at The Oakland Arena! I have non memory whatsoever of T-Bone Burnett.LOL

  • @emjee wow cool you were at that who show also. my senior year in highschool. they were still young enough to really matter in 82. they kicked ass wow !!...than i saw them in 89 . by than they jumped the shark.

  • @bosoxyaz8 From '82 to '89 what would say was different. Was it just their age, or something about the show, etc.?

  • @counterstriving Yeah they just seemed young still on that 1982 tour. they were heavy no stupid horns.

  • @counterstriving for everyone else im talking about the who not the stones.

  • @wilberman Mick looks very tired here (probably from touring), that's most likely the reason he looks older then 38.

  • Comment removed

  • @wilberman according to Wikipedia he was born in 1936, so here he would be 45!!

  • @wilberman according to Wikipedia he was born in 1936

  • but you know they were also on drugs too.

    No matter what mick is awesome! You gotta love him.

  • @cuongnhu246 cold turkey on this tour

  • he was about 40 here

  • @El135o thoughtless cynicism, good job

  • i wonder what he does to stay in such great shape. the guy has like 28 waist lol.

  • A friend saw him up close during the concert in Calgary - said he has definitely got a six-pack.

  • I wouldn't say Brad Pitt is "classic gorgeous" -- he's "cute", not really handsome. Mick has great facial bones, good wide mouth and his features really are model-worthy. He's got character. If you want to see classically handsome, look at Rudolph Nureyev. Mick could've been a dancer too.

  • It's all down to the individual. At the beginning of the Beatles, Ringo was the one most of the girls seemed to love. Even more than Paul! Personality and charm sure do go a loooong way. I must be a good faker in both aspects because I've had a few really cute girlfriends. And I've been turned down by sub-par girls. You never really can tell.

  • Ringo I never could see what anyone thought was good looking in that. He looks sort of sweet but not too bright. Intelligence counts for a lot - as does plain old animal magnetism. Combine the 2 and it's deadly. Mick Jagger has both. Your attitude towards women, by saying "sub par" girls -- reveals a thing or two. You might have been turned down by the smarter ones.

  • Come on, they were saying Mick was ugly when I was a kid, back in the mid sixties. He was beautiful back then , more ugly now. But then that's life, isn't it??

  • oh its ok, i totally understand. he is ugly-beautifull.= p

  • Oh I think Jagger is fall down gorgeous...

  • Great Video. Thanks for posting. Will Share.

  • wyman doesnt celebrate his 27th here as if its 1981 it cant be. he was born in 1936

  • lol

  • I THINK BILL WAS JOKING!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more