Added: 5 years ago
From: iamaphoney
Views: 47,218
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (228)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I do not bereave this but another "clue" is the McFarlane YS series 1 figure line had 2 Paul's, one with the Glove and one with caption Fred. But something i did notase is on the Revolver, Rubber sole, Sgt. Pepper, Abbey Road, Yellow Sub, Yesterday and Today, With The Beatles, Please Please Me, LOVE, HELP!, and a few more, Paul and Ringo are next to each other, and they are the last 2 Beatles alive.

  • Try listening to the backmasking of songs with your eyes closed. Clearly sounds like nothing right?

  • if paul really is dead, faul did an excellent job filling his shoes. i mean, Oh, Darling is an excellent song, but it was recorded after paul supposedly died. well done, faul!

  • @channyandseddiefan Black carnations are really rare to find. In an interview he said they were out of red ones and he just found that one lying around. I'm neutral about the Paul is dead theory but something right there sounds fishy.

  • What is truely amazing to me is that people still can't believe that these things happen. The entire entertainment industry is a mind control cult and the put it right in your face every day! So if you are still totally blind and unable to see the painfully obvious then you are in need of some rather significant enlightenment. Stop clinging to these false idols and move beyond what they are spoon feeding you from craddle to grave. They use this shit to make your life totally pointless!

  • TWO FINGERS AND A THUMB

  • Yes? No? Maybe So!....it's all very intense.

  • If you are unsure if he died just go to macca funhouse. All your answers will be there...

  • did he died?

  • I'm not saying I believe Paul's dead, because I don't, but When they were in the white tuxes, Paul had a black flower on his suit and the other 3 guys had red flowers.

  • @channyandseddiefan That's right and there is no such thing as a black rose - it's a red rose spray-painted black.

  • I'd swear all these "imaphoney" uploads are for a Ph.D. thesis on "Fomenting the discontent of societal masses by perpetuating implausible mythic folklore."

  • forgive me for my spelling i had to take some out for my fitting

  • Conspiracy theorists are by and large w%nkers! maybe that's a bit harsh-they're largely clever people gone wrong! Having learnt to mistrust the powers that be,they take a huge leap,mistaking incompetence for ultra organised, sinister plots! and then multiply that error by mistaking themselves for scientists and journalist! The result (as here) is a depressing descent into fairytales backed with risible 'evidence'-ftales told with the defence that anyone who doesn't believe is a shill or sheep!

  • @thenowuk The Story WILL Live Forever, But It May Not Be True.

  • @thenowuk we the sheeple who will live on for ever-me- ...the devil rules the skies lands and sea -bible-... there is no one different we are all the same sheeple until no one rules if no one rules evil will try to rule if evil cant rule they kll since free will we cant stop ppl from killing without killing them or holding them in a prison we cant have a prison without gourds or cells to make those things we need jobs cant have obs unless we have a government and guess who rules ( hint who tries

  • There are a couple of Italian scientists who started out trying to prove he was alive by using biometrics and ended up concluding that pre and post 1966 Paul are not the same man. The article is in the Italian version of the August 2009 Wired magazine and the translation of the article is at the Plastic Macca website. It won't let me post the link so google Plastic Macca and go to January 2010 in the blog archive there and read Forensic Science Proves Paul Was Replaced.

  • @davidioanfan seen it-about as authentic as a a £6 pound note-just more nobodys trying to make a name for themselves

  • **Yawn** I see you're still not able to remove the padlock from you're mind (typical pseudo-skeptic). Thats fine with me, the weight of the evidence speaks for itself, thats all that matters in the end.

  • lol "EVERYONE'S DEAD"

  • How does someone go from being solely left handed and in fact one of the best known left handed guitar players in the world (pre-1966, Faul is right handed), to practically over night becoming a right hander in a manner that wreaks of suspicion giving prior comments from JPM such as these (1963):

    "The only thing I couldn't cure myself of was being left-handed. I do everything with my left hand, and no matter how I try I can't change the habit"

    This defies all known logic.

  • @pmsan29 You haven't answered any of my questions still! now you copy and paste silly ideas from websites-that is the extent of your 'research'-you present these as facts?!!! for example-his appearance-where is any evidence for that? I could take pictures of you 4 or 5 years apart and say you've changed-Lenon's appearance changed far more than Maccas-did he die in '66?!!!!

    I've asked you to explain the backmasking and explained how it can be faked-still no answer

  • @pmsan29 ...which is-there are no reports of any such crash,his death would be impossible to 'cover up'/all his family-dad and brother,other Beatles,friends,other bands,the press,would all have to have been in on it,before you examine the limits of 60's plastic surgery,who wrote all the amazing songs? etc it's insane. none of the 'messages' on here sound like what is implied unless you are told what to listen for beforehand...i've explained the impossiblity of incorporating these into a melody

  • @thenowuk they could have been paidor dont care cuz all the beatles did was smoke pot right they could have been a prob child and left home

  • @pmsan29 He didn't change from left to right-just because there is a pic of him playing right handed-what does that prove?nothing Heather silenced? only because she would sell her story of their personal life-you take that and go 'aha! must be because he's dead' lol you read anything into anything to fit your conspiracy. Take quotes out of context,anything to back up your stupid theory. Your 'research' is off of Mr Google and mr internet! serious stuff,top research! well done I'm sold again!

  • @thenowuk More faulty logic and abject denial. You are as bogus a 'skeptic' as they come good sir :)

  • @pmsan29 and don't think I haven't noticed how you give your own comments 'thumbs up' within minutes of posting-just shows how insecure you are in your pathetic argument-what a loser

  • *Why were pics of Paul recycled?

    * Why were composite pics of Paul made?

    * Why was Mal Evans tooken out just before the release of his tell all book?

    *Why all the visual clues of Paul being dead on the various forms of Beatles art?

    *Why all the backmasked tracks saying Paul is dead or bloody?

    *Why was Heather Mills gagged and silenced, what does she have in her personal box that she claims will expose Faul?

    ...........Serious questions, that deserve a serious investigation

  • All these changes within a span of a few months...Just happenstance? Yeah right. Faul is a double, mind you a very bad one. Nothing new though in the world of international espionage, this is S.O.P.

  • @pmsan29 I've read pretty much every Beatles book AND all your 'clue' nonsense. There are not 'so many hidden messages'-have you any idea how hard it would be to record a song with melody/words etc and have it spell something /a message when played backwards? impossible! please explain!you would have to change the entire song! you are -ironically-clueless. you are obviously not a musician or an engineer! I could fund such messages anywhere,especially if i'm told what to listen for....

  • the "clues" on Yellow Submarine cover is sooooooooooo stupid...

  • PAUL IS NOT DEAD!

  • Could it not be possible that the had planned al the visual thing's as a piss take 'cos they knew the hysteria surrounding it?? I think that would be more than likely. Goes with the sick british humour

  • you have to realize that all those backwards messages are mistakes because they are very obviously not backmasked. you can tell when there is backmasking in a song, try listening to "stairway to heaven" by led zeppelin.

  • @byemynameishi

    The theory of reverse speech is that it is a form of subconscious communication.

  • 0:50 - look into his eyes!

    it`s obvious that he says in his mind to the camera "hey guys ,i`m dead!lol"

  • back in the ussr reversed message?

    okay,so Lenin created ussr just to let it become a clue that paul is dead in 1968.the name "ussr" is not just political name.it`s a clue to paul`s dead!

    that`s why the beatles were banned in the ussr!cuz paul is fucking dead!

  • I am sure someday people will have clues about Paul's replacement before The Beatles started to play! haha

  • You can replace politicians, presidents, pope, my mother but not Paul McCartney

  • watching this just made me want to listen to some more beatles.

  • That have a lot of sense :Oh! reversed says Paul!

  • Am I the one who's gonna have to say it and I'll Say it slowly for the paranoid retards here.... The Second paul was on A video Screen, do you know what a video screen is........ good.............here's a cookie.

  • I just can say, Paul is playing guitar with the right hand at 0:48, and it´s not the video, the guitar it´s for a left handed one...

  • @IchbinLordVoldemort so what? he learnt to play right and left handede-even playing right handed guitars upside down as a youth-it's called TALENT

  • Did anyone else notice that the rose in Paul's lapel is black in "Your Mother Should Know." :O

  • 0:06 Satanic symbol.

  • is this serious?! get a life!

  • Johns hand over pauls head does not mean he's dead. John is doing love in sign language

  • "love" in sign language has the thumb extended. The sign here is satanic. look up satanic hand symbols celebs.

  • So is Ringo really Fingo?

  • The beatles probely did this so people would buy more of there records. iamaphoney is most likley a 45 year old virgin living in his mom's basement with no life.

  • @deb310red

    feorge faul fingo and fohn! - the jab joe/the rab roe/the gab goe/the pab poe!

  • @deb310red ya know im not joking but that was funNY!!!!!!!

  • total bullshit paul is alive and well and i hope it stays that way 4 a long long time, 4 any one who belives this 40 year old rumor get a damn life!

  • whats the name of sound starts at 0:49 ?

  • @Killerhackpas: The song is "Oh! Darling".

  • Thanks !

  • Im sure they replaced him. It would of been easy for them(lockwood./EMI)to do.

    This faul character is taller, his head shape is totally different, and his ears are the dead give away...amongst numerous other anomalies.

  • @pmsan29 Yes,it would have ben so easy to replace the most famous man in Britain-I'm sure his Dad and brother would happily have gone along with it -as would the other Beatles! get a life! Jesus! how dumb are you?then there's the small problem of finding an exact replica who has amazing talent! the problem with you moronic theorists is you don't understand The Beatles very British sense of humour-they're laughing at you! but,hey,maybe i'm a lizard who's working for the illuminati-ah yes!

  • @thenowuk Augh the Naivety of some people. Replacing Paul with Faul is the easy part, and amongst global intel circles quite common IE doubles and decoys. Bribes, threats and blackmail would insure that no one steps out of line, including his (Pauls not Fauls) family. Heather Mills and Mal Evans anyone? One was succesfully silenced and the other was out right murdered in cold blood to keep the goods on ole' Faul hush..hush. Your living in fantasy land if you think none of this is possible.

  • @pmsan29 that is the funniest response I've ever seen. You are the very embodiment of naivety if you can think that is possible. Replacement was easy huh? Jesus,just think about what you're saying. But being in on the 'conspiracy' is empowering isn't it? gives you a sense of importance and elitism-you know what others don't don't you?enjoy your delusional,self importantance,sad and pathetic as it is. You are no different to a religious extremist (tho the similarity will elude you)

  • @thenowuk Actually research the topics that you denounce and are utterly uninformed in before you spew a bunch of knee jerk reactionary nonsense. This way you will be able to make an educated decision on the matter and hopefully draw some reasonable conclusions that are atleast based on some semblance of truth without making yourself look like an ass.

    What did Einstein once say? Oh yes, "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance".

    Pseudo skeptics=fail

  • @pmsan29 research? like you,you mean?my 5 year old cousin would laugh at your reasoning-i've read the fairy stories thanks-ha! you are so deluded-quoting Einstein too! a man of logic,how ironic that you should quote from him! keep up the self-importance,feel that power huh? you do make me laugh tho so keep it coming-again,highly ironic as you have no sense of humour yourself,if you did you may understand the humour of those who started these rumours and the band who played with them(for a laugh)

  • @thenowuk As opposed to you who only pretends to be informed..lol. Don't make me laugh. You are the quintessential pseudo-skeptic, and your posts are the text book example of bogus debunking tactics and dime a dozen bogus disinformation.

  • @pmsan29 a textbook 'conspiracy' answer -congratulations! go to the top of the looney bin. you are a deluded,self important loony........you know I could start a mick Jagger is dead or Pete Townsend is dead story,it's easy if you look hard enough-oh this means this and that means that-play this backwards etc-easier with Beatles as they had a sense of humour and played along with it to laugh at fools like you-you obviously have too much time on your hands but hey,enjoy wasting it

  • Comment removed

  • @thenowuk Have you actually studied the details concerning the many physical anomalies and differences between Paul and Faul? By the sound of your rubbish responses, I'd say no. Have you stopped to contemplate why their were so many hidden messages and images in the Beatles songs and album covers if none of this were so? 2+2=4

    Its obvious they offed him, anyone with two eyes and a working brain would be able to tell that. lol@'sense of humour'........What an ass backwards explanation.

  • Comment removed

  • @pmsan29 YOU get 2+2 =5! To you,it's more reasonable to suggest that he died and was replaced by an exact replica who wrote amazing songs,his family,band members,Rolling Stones etc were all in on it.!-they must've been as they knew him intimately-THAT is more likely to you than the fact that the 'clues' were invoked by student hippies for fun ,a joke that got out of control,especially when Lennon decided to play with it to amuse himself. If so,you have no reasoning or awareness in your head.

  • @thenowuk Yawn, more prosaic, unconvincing rationalizations. Amazing songs? Pre 66 or post? Certainly you mean pre the switch, as their is a noticeable change in the quality of Fauls music after 66 coinciding with the MANY anomalous changes in 'Pauls' appearance (enter Faul). Its all subjective though, and to suggest that everyone was in on 'it' is somewhat accurate as the Stones have many mysterious circumstances surrounding them as well. LOL....Do us all a favor and please do some research.

  • @pmsan29 WHAT? his songs were superb pre and post 66-mind you i see you're a fan of brain dead/passionlessmusic such as Heart (cough splutter-sorry trying not to laugh)....are so everyone was in on 'it'-The Stones/family/friends/George Martin/police/other bands/press....lol-and u ask me to do research?I've read everything ever published more or less-where's yours?you have zero proof for any of this. PS play a heart song backwards-it says' we are f*cking lame,safe muzak for dumb c*nts'-try it

  • @thenowuk So you've read everything from A to Z, rubber stamped with the establishments 'official' point of view imprinted on it, big deal, so what? Your inflated sense of self is getting the best of you..lol Please take the chip off your shoulder.

    We can bicker back and forth about trivial musical tastes, that's all subjective though and a waste of time. Its unquestioning cogs in the wheel like you that give the sheep a bad name, good sir :)

  • @pmsan29 ha ha-establishment books-you're a paranoid fool-Ive read all sorts including the original 'paul is dead' texts-underground press the lot-again you avoid the question-tell me how they wrote the songs exactly with the melody and lyrics working forwards-for the song and backwards for the 'message'-you just don't have a f*cking clue.....I question anything that smels of b*llshit-be it the government or morons like yourself.....

  • Comment removed

  • @pmsan29 I've read pretty much every Beatles book AND all your 'clue' nonsense. There are not 'so many hidden messages'-have you any idea how hard it would be to record a song with melody/words etc and have it spell something /a message when played backwards? impossible! please explain!you would have to change the entire song! you are -ironically-clueless. you are obviously not a musician or an engineer! I could fund such messages anywhere,especially if i'm told what to listen for....

  • @thenowuk Study the art of backmasking, this isn't rocket science..You don't have to be an engineer or a super producer to know how to incorporate backmasking or subliminal messages into tracks. Whether or not it is employed purposely is up for debate, although by most indications it seems to be placed there on purpose, as most of the messages in backmasked tracks are very specific and relative to a certain theme IE 'Paul is dead..miss him' etc...

    All of this is by mere chance? Don't think so.

  • @pmsan29 you could only do that by recording on a separate track away from the melody and lyrics-at least from what you're presenting as 'clues'-you have 'clues' where the melody and song are creating the 'message'-not a separate track....you now say you're not sure if they're presented purposely or not?!!!! if they're not then u agree that it's by chance

  • @thenowuk 'By chance' my ass. There are no coincidences, especially in this particular case where the subliminal messages only serve to further support the mounds of evidence that point to Paul James McCartney being replaced.

  • @pmsan29 There is no evidence-you contradicted yourself again-earlier you said that 'whether it's there on purpose or not is up for debate' now u say 'there are no coincidences'. You don't provide any evidence or answer the questions because u cannot. The onus in on you -prove he is dead if there is a 'mountain of evidence' a mountain of horsesh*t more like lol

  • @nowuk Wow Not only do you suffer from cognitive dissonance but you are also dyslexic. A 2 minute google search and a bit of investigating into Beatles songs with subliminal messages would tell anyone (with enough smarts and discernment) that something is up. Mind you, there are several serious websites out there where all the messages are catalogued and explained in great detail.

    I am not beholden to you in anyway to do the research that you yourself should be doing. Get to work! Chop, chop

  • @pmsan29 Ha ha so your 'research'is off the internet! that is your famous 'research'?!!!! and off Google! that vast bastion of impartiality-very underground and radical! LOL you get worse-avoidance again-still no answers to my questions-Google-Lwow-you're a fully fledged anarchist-Oh i have to hand it to you that is some serious research you have going on there!-i'm sold!

  • @thenowuk Typical psuedo skeptic arguments to avoid having to do any real investigating on you're own inituitive. I must say you are too predictable. Some how you manage to make yourself look like more of a clueless ass with each new sentence you type. You would make James Randi crack a smile. Keep in mind that serious research rooted in real investigation and objectiveness is key to unravelling any mystery, much of this sort of sleuthing is found here on the web. To say other wise is foolish.

  • @pmsan29 nice lot of Gobbledeegook there! you are saying nothing-still avoiding the question and your only research is off the internet! and via Google-explain how your famous-world famous i think-research is not 'establishment'-you fall for every single piece of bullshit -gullible doesn't even half cover it- ha ha ha as Lennon once said 'the joker laughs at you'-to any rational person you should be in an asylum-you can't answer a single question

  • @pmsan29 Come on then dickhead-explain to everyone how you would compose a song with parts that when played backwards spell a 'message' out without changing the songs melody or lyrics?......... you can't because it's impossible-and that's the least of the impossibilities that you brand about. You pompously spread your bullshit on Beatles pages without thinking it thru first-waste of space-you're looking for sh$t that isn't there,sorry to pop your self important balloon but you're a f%cking idiot

  • @thenowuk You are a clueless moron. Study backmasking and recording multiple vocal tracks, and than get back to me.

    

  • @pmsan29 you avoided the question again-you have no answer-15 years an engineer and producer-who's clueless?-I ask again please explain-saying 'backmasking' is not an answer-the 'clues' have the songs played backwards-explain how you could write a song with the melody and lyrics planned so that it creates a message when played backwards without altering the original melody to fit your message?explain please- and they were using 4 track analogue tapes not digital-impossible u cretin...

  • @thenowuk The specifics of backmasking is irrelevant to the overall point Im making (backmasking how-to-do's are all over the net) RE: Backmasking was done and was possible even in the 60's, that simple fact is irrefutable. The questions from you should be, Why was it done? And what were they trying to tell us? I honestly couldn't give a damn about your ego driven boasting concerning your many years as this-this-and-that. Use some basic common sense to overcome you're cognitive dissonance.

  • @pmsan29 you don't understand backmasking-eg on here you have Back in the USSR and the melody and vocals are creating the message when played backwards-that would have had to have been planned in advance when writing the melody and lyrics-to create the message-the point isn't if backmasking is possible-you just don't understand how it's done-common sense is devoid in all your replies.

  • @thenowuk And your point is? By any means of reasoning you've answered your own questions. THEY'RE LYRICS (IN THE CASE OF TRACKS WITH BACKMASKING) WERE DESIGNED TO HAVE A DOUBLE MEANING. It's not that difficult as you are making it out to seem :)

  • @pmsan29 so for eg-back in the ussr was written with lyrics that perfectly fitted the song and when played bacwards perfectly created a message as did numerous others? that's what you think? lol you really are a dumb sh*t-also Paul's replica was created using 60's plastic surgery?wrote brilliant songs?was accepted by the others?his dad?brother?friends?other bands?!!!! you do realise this whole thing was created by hippie students wondering why the band hadn't toured for ages?ie-made up!

  • @thenowuk Everything you are parroting from you're establishment approved books (concerning true Beatles/Record industry history) revolves around faulty logic and cognitive dissonance. You're argument simply isn't convincing, sorry. You are living in fantasy land, on top of that I seriously doubt you've ever looked at all the evidence, one quick glance at your rubbish posts would tell anyone that.

  • @pmsan29 You say he's dead-I'm asking you questions and you have no answers-'establishment books'? you don't even know what that means! so International times was establishment was it?lol you just admitted your famous 'research' comes from the internet and google!!!!!!! Google? very alternative-wow you have some top sources-top research there-you are the new Sherlock Holmes-you can't get much more 'establishment' than Google you cretin - now you do YOUR-research

  • @thenowuk Please explain these anomalies to me: * His eyes changed from Brown to green * He grew 2 inches at the age of 24 * His voiceprints changed * His jawline changed 6% * His Tragus changed * His earlones became unattached * His nasal spine grew * His palate got bigger * His canine tooth became un-rotated * His head became more elongated * His eyelashes thinned out * His eyebrows changed * His shoe size changed from 8 to 9.5 * His body hair became sparser
  • Comment removed

  • @PaulisWilliam Good! a sense of humour is the first step for you

  • @pmsan29 O___O Ya, Umm, What You Said... Anyways, I Agree 100%!!!! People Don't Want To Think Paul IS Dead So They Don't Look At ANY Clues,

  • o, everyone's dead. Why didn't you tell me sooner? So, John, Ringo and George were replaced as well....sure thing....please, people....forget this theory, it is totally nonsense

  • @mecaesare No, He Did Not Mean EVERYONE IS DEAD!!!! He Just Meant Paul. And PAUL Is Dead Is Not Nonsense...

  • @PaulisWilliam mecaesare was obviously being sarcastic and yet again you misunderstood-you are maybe the most gullible person alive-I keep teling you that you need a sense of humour,you take everything literally which is why you fall for the 'Paul is dead' silliness

  • @mecaesare ... it could meen somthing else

  • @mecaesare why is it nonsense.?what research have u done?

  • so: the beatles + 23 = paul is dead

    Wtf, i don't believe it.

  • i think pauls alive and the beatles did all this stuff and left all these clues as a joke to lead us all on.

  • me too!

  • The black rose on video 10......hmmmmm

  • Paul is wearing a black rose......hmmmmmm.

  • The Two Paul Thing ( From what I think) is him and a screen showing him.

  • I find the comment "everyone's dead" interesting. That would lend some credence to the belief that they were all replaced.

  • according to paul is dead theorists not only paul died and was replaced but the beatles decided to give subtle clues of the truth in their works... why?

  • animators use 3 fingers instead of 4 because it's a lot cheaper...

  • did anyone notice that paul's flower is black when they're all in tuxes? still too far fetched for me though.

  • yeah, i need something more concrete.

    i watched all up to 10 and just a handful made sense.

    i still believe in the hoax, but there are better clues out there then what you're providing. The black rose? You didn't seem to notice that for some reason "/

  • Ah, misinterpretation at it's best. These seem more fake the second time around.

  • What does the NR stand for?

  • 23?

    2: two pauls

    3: three remaining beatles.

    pretty paranoid if you ask me..

  • lol this guys name is i am phoney

  • yet they didnt notice pauls black rose when the rest had orange... this is bs they find all the stupid stuff and dont notice the ovious?

  • thats a really good call

  • ussr at the end is a plane

  • At 26 he plays guitar with right... Impossible for a left-hand... I'm a huge Beatles fan,I'm crazy for them and this fact of paul is deaed or not makes me crazy..Why we can't have the truth??

  • hes not dead...he was on Letterman recently. anyone who actually thinks h died is retarded, listen to the music, it stays consistent.

  • @Preisellack I saw that interview, and wondered why he had so much trouble recalling their first American visit and Ed Sullivan. I don't think I could ever forget the details of the most important moment of my life, especially if those events are what has led me to everlasting global fame. Fair point?

  • if they didn't write what they THINK it says in reverse, i never would have hear it.

  • Did you ever play "Crazy Indian Video" on youtube. Funny as Hell but it just shows what you can hear if you are trying to hear something.

  • exactly, if you close your eyes you cant even tell

  • Johns hand on yellow sub. is saying: Rock and Roll. not 'three beatles'

  • the last part sounded sad

    Lennon:PAUL(:(

  • 3 fingers means LOVE. It's not a PID sign. Paul is NOT dead! Not yet.

  • lol i was told that the index and little finger being up and the rest being down was a sign of the devil which rockers tend to use a lot. the thumb wasnt up.make that same symbol on your hand, where do you put your thumb?? and 23 wouldnt mean anything. 78uh, that spiderman comment is funny lol

  • In You Lives Stupidity

  • 23, like random numbers?

    And btw, someone wrote a book that 23 was the answer on everything?

  • At 0:47 Paul is holding his guiter like how a right hander would play Paul is lefty!

  • Except it looks like a lefty guitar hold by a right hander... the image in reversed, that's obvious !

  • also at 0:26 he is holding the flowers in his right hand. im a lefty and find it very uncomfortable to do that it comes as second nature to put things in my left hand

  • yeah and then he switched them to his left hand.. almost as if he forgot he was left handed. lol.

  • notice on 0:25 everyone's wearing a red flower on their tox, while paul's wearing a black flower...

    obviously there are many clues, i think it was just a joke by the beatles, or even a publicity stunt.

  • 0:07 LOL ARE YOU KIDDING???? HE HAS 2 FINGERS UP ITS A COOL SIGN PEOPLE USE! Its going WAYYYYY too far to think that means 3 Beatles!! LOLOLOL

    Also, any Ohhh sound can sound like Paul, especially if you put in a subtitle saying such. And the subtitles are getting ridiculous, the earlier stuff didn't sound liek anything at all and the subtitles didn't even make sense.

  • I think the thumb counts as a finger. Maybe.

  • the beatles had virtually nothing to do with that cartoon Yellow Submarine movie

  • actually, though, they did write the songs and appeared as themselves as the end.

  • That gesture that John is doing over Paul's head is American Sign Language for "I love you".

  • ah, slashy fics, i luv them! ;P

  • one more thing hes holding up 2 the thumb is tucked in if the thumb was out it would be spider man

  • The clues on this video are really pushing it. We've all seen the hands over Paul's head many times and I will admit it is kinda strange that it happens quite often on their albums. But i'm still not convinced this is a clue. No one in 40 years has ever ever convinced me this is a symbol of death. It's a carnation and Black ones are very common BTW. Still not convinced that PID, but keep trying!

  • in the white tuxedos scene, 3 red flowers and one black, guess who got he black one?

  • explain his voice, the songs by him. his range vocally, there are no two people with exactly the same vocal patterns.

  • And 2+3 = 5 Beatles.

  • number 23 representing 2 pauls and 3 beatles, dude that is long sought

  • what he didnt actaully point out is all three beatles have red roses and paul has a bl;ack rose, although i dnt think he is dead i think thebeatles played the conspiracies for a laugh

  • no!

    it was so ppl wpuold bye more cd's and records..we atleast cd's now!

  • yep. and john is holding 1 finger lower than the other 2, predicting his own murder.

    i can make shit up too.

  • lol nice reasoning

  • woah... wheres that last clip from? the car crash one. Im certain its not real but where is it from?

  • this sucks hes not dead and oh bacwards is ho genius

  • black rose on his lapple means NOTHING!

    just Ted Turner messed upi the recoloring process thtas all

  • I just noticed in the video something I hadn't realised before.

    The wall of policeman in front of the car crash scene symbolising the protection of the secret. It was hushed up.

  • no its actually a line in one of the beatles song

    but maybe it has a double meaning

    maybe your right...

  • Okay, I do not believe this whatsoever, I'm just joing the argument for boredom's sake. Some say that the Beatles planted all these things because they had sold their souls or joined up with Satanics to achieve success. To get this success, one of them had to die. They thought that pretending Paul was dead would save them. But John Lennon was murdered anyway.

    Okay, have a go at that.

  • THAT IS AMAZING!!! Lol! I have never ever heard that. That is actually a really awesome explination.

  • OMG we all know the fingers stand for "Rock"

  • It has other signficance.

  • they also stand for A texas sports team (the fingers) .

  • Wait, what john hung over paul was the METAL sign.

    just plain means rock on.

  • I didn't know the beatles played metal...

  • isn't oh backwards ho? not paul?

    so, shouldn't we be speculating as to how many ho's they banged? not, paul being dead?

  • iamphoney your a retared fuck if you think pauls dead and btw in the myth its an OPEN hand over pauls head and yes they mad that

    up it means nothing its a HAND for fucks sake

  • its the number 23, not a clue, like the number 23 thing, they new about it....duh

  • bastarebbe fare il test del dna all attuale paul e a genitori(resti)o parenti(se vivi

    )

  • Già.

  • "In me lives he?" It sounds more like "It be libby."

  • Or "In Me Lizzy."

    Maybe Dizzy Miss Lizzy was a guy?

    LOL

  • I believe that the Beatles done this on purpose.......kinda weird tho that paul has a black rose.....

  • "3 fingers representing the three Beatles"

    That's also the infamous NWO/"devil horns" sign, as used by many "rock stars" and assorted buffoons (and US Presidents/UK royalty/rabbis).