Added: 1 year ago
From: SneekyGamer
Views: 215
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • s have a look at this intelligent design in our own backyard. Where is this intelligent designer who leaves about 2 million asteroids, meteorites in wayward trajectories, threatening our very exisence. Where does it show in plate tectonics? Where in unreliable weather patterns. Why does he allow 4,500,000 stillbirths a year, cutting down life even before birth ? Why does he allow a tiny jellyfish to kill people in a matter of minutes ? Why 2,000,000 toxins ?

  • Sorry mate but all you did is speculate on quantifiable scientific facts and thoeries. Science has explanations for all you "ID evidence". Just because you dont understand something or it looks complicated or precise doesnt mean that a magical "god did it" OH sorry a "designer created it". You need to supply peer reviewed scientific data pointing to ID NOT a creationists interpretation of scientific fact. Accepting science is not a rejection of God, its an acceptance of ones own faith in mankind

  • @JAX301209 Srry bro, all this can just simply not happen by chance. We had less than a 1% chance of ending up in a world perfect for the sustainability of life. A few years ago, a mathematician did a little bit of research on this and found that we had possibly even less than a 0.0005 % chance of ending up in the perfect place for sustainability of life. Now please don't take me the wrong way, I am not an ignorant Christian, like many of the others out there.

  • @SneekyGamer The calculation which supports the creationist argument begins with the probability of a 300-molecule-long protein forming by total random chance(approximately 1 chance in 10*390) Where as the self-replicating peptide is only 32 amino acids long(approximately 1 in 10*40) which is still a very large number but there were billions of trials taking place simultaneously in earths oceans. All creationists arguments are at best dubious and the math showing .0005% chance is another example

  • @JAX301209 I do keep an open mind, but right now I agree that intelligent design is a very, very plausible idea.

  • Good evidence Logan!

    -Josh

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more