John Kerry confronted about World Trade Center 7

[PoetryHound]

If you think Jowenko is credible, note that he says WTC 1 & 2 were NOT demo jobs.

And no, he never said the rapid ejections at WTC 1 & 2 were caused by explosives.

And no, he never said thermite was used.

And no, not one demo expert at CDI says explosives brought down any of the WTC buildings.

Three strikes. You lose.

Strike four: You've presented no evidence that Silvetstein pocketed the insurance payout. Absolutely none.

BTW, misinterpreting the laws of physics doesn't help you.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound so if he says that no explosives were used there is still evidence of projectile ejections from the building, so he is wrong.

So you agree with him about WTC7??? is that what your trying to say??

No strikes, and your Silverstien not pocketing anything is a bunch of bull that you yourself cant prove, everyone knows that when you lose property and insurance pays for it you get something in return, and he got well over the amount that he invested and you living in a fairy tale.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II But the projectile ejections weren't caused by explosives. You have failed to identify a single demo expert who agrees with you.

Jowenko wasn't given all the information about WTC 7. He wasn't told that the firefighters said the building was unstable & likely to collapse. So no, I don't agree with him about WTC 7. But since YOU think he's credible, note that he says WTC 1 & 2 were not brought down with explosives. So that's yet another strike against you.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II As for Silverstein, you have repeatedly failed to provide a single shred of evidence that he pocketed a penny from the insurance payouts. There's plenty of evidence that the insurance payouts were not enough to cover the rebuilding costs and there's plenty of evidence that he has had to borrow money to pay for rebuilding because the insurance payouts were insufficient. You're the one who's living in a fairy tale world. You can't back up any of your claims.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound I did back up my claims, and its you that has to provide proof that he didnt get any money, you have to be pretty retarded to believe that he didnt. You again hide behind your silverstein rant and forget what started this convo in the first place ,WTC7.

You told me to support my WTC7 demo and I presented you Jowenko, you then stated his 2 towers theory, and me saying I disagree with him, keep hiding little man, you fucking flip flop. If one is demo they all are demos

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II So now that you're caught red-handed making a baseless claim about Silverstein pocketing the insurance payout, you tell me to prove he didn't. LOL! You made the claim. You back it up. Claiming "it's obvious" isn't a substitute for backing it up.

You're the one who says Jowenko is credible. He said WTC 1 & 2 were not demos.

"If one is demo they all are demos"

Yet another in an endless series of unsubstantiated assertions from you. LOL!

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound Jowenko says WTC7 was a demo and he is a demolitions EXPERT.

He said WTC 1 and 2 were not but HE IS WRONG. This is why.

a Parameter wall unit weighing 4 tons and 30 feet long falling faster than the acceleration of gravity on WTC demo.

watch?v=xvw0_i1rGns

get off Silversteins nuts, again you fail to realize you agree with Jowenko on WTC7 being a demo, along with other demo experts from CDI.

Again, who are you to say who is expert and who is not???? You lost. Sorry

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II So your opinion of Jowenko is that he's an expert. Wait! No he's not! LOL!

BTW, you still haven't cited a single demo expert who agrees with you that the ejections were caused by explosives. So you fail on that.

And you fail on showing that Silverstein pocketed any insurance payouts. There's no evidence of it.

And you fail on presenting any demo experts from CDI who agree with you.

Got anything besides unsubstantiated assertions?

[DarkDragon187II]

I always forget to mention Danny Jowenko as a Demolition Explosives expert that you can also bash on, because your text box comments over excel The Laws of Physics and Scientific Theories, and modern architectural design that constructed a building in the 1980s that can withstand the forces of nature, in which fires caused from office furniture on few floors brought down

watch?v=sURmDpC3qxg

[DarkDragon187II]

The Bush and Blair war crimes trial also includes the pre planned attacks on 911. Im not out of gas. I just fueled the fire.

You cant prove the WTC 7 building falling in 7 secs on mere fire, and WTC 6 and Oklahoma building losing 50% of its structure and still stand. You just cant, science and physics face palms you in the face at 100 mph and stops you dead on your tracks. Good luck

Truthers dont have impact? well look at yourself continuing to respond, the assertions raise GOOD QUESTIONS

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Typical truther. Whenever they're backed into a corner, they run away and change the subject. Let's review:

You claimed ejections from twin towers were caused by explosives. Not a single demo expert says so.

You claimed thermite was used in addition to explosives. Not a single demo expert says so.

You claimed Silverstein pocketed the insurance payouts. You present no evidence to support that.

Yes, truthers have no impact. I respond because it's fun to shove you around.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound Your backed in a corner tough guy, you avoid the purpose of this video which is WTC7

Ejections came from twin towers in video evidence, and more than one demo expert says so, you fail to prove one demo expert that denies such claims

More than one person at CDI suspect explosives and CDI is a WORLD WIDE DEMO EXPERT. So who the hell are you to say who is an expert and who isnt?

Thermite or another form incendiary was used, what else caused the molten steel fused with concrete?

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II

Nope, not even one demo expert says your fast ejections indicate explosive. If you claim there is more than one, then name them. You can't do it.

Not one single demo expert at CDI says explosives were used on 9/11. That's why you can't name any. All you have is an explosives loader who has no expertise.

Not one single demo expert says thermite was used either. But I admit I enjoy watching you jump back & forth between claiming explosives & then thermite.

[DarkDragon187II]

2 of 2, Larry Silverstein is documented to have recieved 4.5 billion in insurance payouts, look it up on Wikipedia, or is that not "pro" enough for you?

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II The $4.5 billion payout went to Silverstein Properties and the PANY. There's no evidence Silverstein pocketed a penny of it. To the contrary, all of the payout has gone to rebuilding and it's not even enough. That's why Silverstein has gone into debt with Liberty Bonds & other debt instruments. 911 was a big money loser for Silverstein. He had to continue making lease payments to PANY even though he no longer had any tenants paying him rent.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Did you know Silvetrstein tried to insure the complex for just $1.5 billion? Lenders & PANY wanted him to insure it for $5.5 b omstead, and they compromised at $3.5b. So he could have gotten a $5.5 billion payout but instead was trying for just $1.5 b. Not exactly the behavior of someone engaged in insurance fraud.

Did you that not all the insurance policies were even in place when 9/11 struck?

Not exactly the behavior of someone engaged in insurance fraud.

[DarkDragon187II]

Silverstein pocketed billions, he took his insurance company to court, FIND IT

There is more than one person from CDI that confirms explosions, I dont know what kind of "certificate" you require to listen to common sense, CDI is a worldwide Demo expert

Thermite is confirmed by PROFESSORS, again I dont know what kind of certificate you require to understand

89% of the CNN votes believe 911 is an inside job

Debunk this smart guy Bush & Blair guilty of war crimes

watch?v=pZxa0-IXl_U

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II All insurance payouts have gone to rebuilding. Silverstein pocketed nothing. You have failed to show he pocketed a penny.

Not 1 single demo expert from CDI has ever said there were detonation charges on 9/11. Prove me wrong.

Thermite is not confirmed by one single incendiaries expert or demo expert. Not one in the entire world.

CNN votes are about as unscientific as you can get. How come you didn't know that?

Not 1 demo expert says your ejections were caused by explosions.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Once again, you forgot to explain how the remaining standing columns were brought down. If ironworkers didn't use torches to cut them and bring them down, then how were they brought down??? Don't bother looking it up on Joe Blow's unaccountable, piece-of-shit conspiracy web site. They too run away from the subject.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound You completely fail to show me a link where it states that they were cut down with torches. You completely fail to show ANY LINKS at all to support ANYTHING that you say. Your text comments surpass Professors, professional demolition companies, politicians, eye witnesses, photo, and video evidence, and yet 89% of CNN voters believe that there is a government coverup behind 911, and you completely dodge the Bush and Blair found guilty of War Crimes

You are really good

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II How do I link to demo experts who don't say anything about any explosives or thermite. You're the one who has no links to back up your claims.

You have utterly failed to show Silverstein pocketed billions.

You have utterly failed to show a single CDI demo expert who says explosives were used.

You have utterly failed to show a demo expert who says the ejections were caused by explosions.

You have utterly failed so identify a demo expert who says thermite was used.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II For the second time, CNN polls are anything but scientific. Even CNN admits that. In scientific polls, less than 25% believe any of the inside job fantasies.

Stop jumping around and changing the subject. You're the one that brought up the angled cuts. Now you run away from it. For the 4th time, how were the remaining standing columns brought down after 9/11? Do you admit ironworkers brought them down? If not, then how did they come down?

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound Pictures show the cuts, now prove to me that they were cut after the "attacks"

And polls are polls no matter what is the case, and show me your "25% of scientists agree" cause I call bull shit on ALL your claims. AE911 dot org has thousands of professional people backing it up. Who are you to decide who is pro and who is not? you have not PUT A SINGLE LINK TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS!!!

Debunk this smart guy

Bush Blair GUILTY OF WAR CRIMES

watch?v=pZxa0-IXl_U

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II

Cuts made by ironworker (start at about 1:35 where they point out the angled cuts they made):

watch?v=LJyBuANVkQ4&feature=pl­ayer_embedded

I was wrong. It's not 25%, it's only 15% who buy the inside job conspiracy theories:

.w w w *angus-reid*com/polls/3859/mos­t_americans_reject_9_11_conspi­racy_theories/

The CNN poll is not scientific. Do you even know what that means? The only people who bother to respond to it are truthers. And they can vote multiple times.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound the video you showed at 1:35 is a different area of the building, and yes they used demo practices to take down the rest of the destructed building.

watch?v=EO7SvhYI_0Y&feature=re­lated, these are pictures of the CORE COLUMNS when cleaning began, the ones you showed are of the "bow tie" connection, they are different areas of the buildings. Either way, when you look at the destruction, it is scientifically impossible for jet fuel fire to cause all that destruction.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II The video I showed you shows that ironworkers used angled cuts to bring down the remaining standing columns. Thanks for admitting that the ironworkers brought down the remaining perimeter columns. How were the remaining core columns brought down? Answer: The same way. There's zero evidence of thermite cuts.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound 2 of 2, WTC7 didnt get hit by a plane. WTC6 had the entire north tower fall on it and have about 50% of its structure broken off and the rest still standing, yet WTC7 fell at the acceleration of gravity in 7 seconds and had no part of tower 1 or 2 fall on it.

Science plays a big part in the demo findings and videos and pictures that you seem to ignore with a passion. Polls express opinions and its a big number to simply "ignore" because its "not scientific."

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II The CNN poll number should be ignored by any sensible person precisely because it's not scientific. If only truthers bother to vote and they can vote multiple times, then the result is meaningless. As I've shown you, only 15% believe the inside job stories, about the same percentage as believe all sorts of conspiracy theories. You can keep deceiving yourself or face the fact that the truther theories are rejected by most people.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound you said "You can keep deceiving yourself or face the fact that the truther theories are rejected by most people" you never look up AE911truth right, they have no body

CNN polls debunk your claim above because people who vote, let them take it again and it will be the same you dont need a science degree to understand that. And it has a meaning, a purpose. Again you ignore the Bush Blair War Crimes Trail, WTC6 and Oklahoma. Your lame YOU CANT DEBUNK THOSE!! HAHAHA

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Yes, the charlatans at ae911twoof. There are more scientists who believe in creationism than believe in any of the various inside jobby job theories. They can't even agree among themselves whether it was explosives or thermite or thermate or nanothermite or some combination of things.

The CNN poll debunks itself. It isn't legit because (for the 3rd time) only truthers bother to vote & they can vote multiple times. Keep running away from the poll I showed you!

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II If you want to know why truthers are having no impact on anything, it's because all they have are unsubstantiated assertions, pseudoscience, intentional misinterpretations, and phony polls.

As for Bush and Blair, they and others may well be guilty of war crimes in Iraq, but that has nothing to do with whether demo experts confirm your baseless claims or whether there's any evidence of Silverstein pocketing a penny from the insurance payouts. You're out of gas.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound 3 of 3, WTC7 was made in the 80s and WTC6 had the same outcome of the Oklahoma city bombing building, they both lost over 40% of their structure and still stood

Silverstien and his plotters had the brainwashing techniques down, even the timing of the insurance claims in order to look legit and no knowledge of

And again, you keep ignoring the Bush Blair War Crimes trial, if you look far enough into the trail you will also find the preplanned attacks of Sept 11

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II "even the timing of the insurance claims"

Actually, no. He didn't have all the insurance policies in place when 9/11 struck.

And he tried to insure the WTC complex for just $1.5 billion.

And he lost money from 9/11.

None of that is the behavior of someone engaged in insurance fraud.

If you have any evidence that Silverstein engaged in insurance fraud, you should provide it to the insurance companies because they don't think he engaged in fraud.

[DarkDragon187II]

you said "tremendous kinetic energy", even if that were true, this would happen watch?v=owyqt-8RnKI

If you think you know Kinetic Energy, you fail to realize that even when a hammer strikes a nail it loses force, and there was not enough force from the top of the Towers to just come down floor on top floor without help of explosives watch?v=zt-KgVFIa9c

How do you explain the angles cut on the steel frames in this video watch?v=R4RMH79nUHw @6:28

Demolition Expert watch?v=ns_hjONWZ88

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Angled beams were cut by iron workers. How else did they bring down the remaining standing columns? Bet you can't answer that one.

Your "demo expert" is no such thing. Sullivan is the explosives loader I already mentioned to you. Hee hee!

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound You havent linked to anything that you say. And you choose to say only what you can try to hide with your thumb. You cant even debunk any of those videos that I put links for you. I put the demo crew with their molten steel ball in my last message why do you keep ignoring it?? If you think that CDI are not demolition experts, do you need more or what? More thermite proof watch?v=henRQymtt5M

Debunk this. Bush and Blair found guilty of war crimes

watch?v=pZxa0-IXl_U

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II

You claim Silverstein pocketed billions. Says which person with direct knowledge? None.

You claim the ejections were caused by explosives. Says which demo expert? None.

You claim steel was bent by - what? Thermite? Says what metallurgist or incendiaries expert? None.

You claim sounds on videos came from explosives. Says which demo expert? None.

All you have are claims by clowns. CDI has demo experts. Sullivan wasn't one of them.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound message 2 of 2 Chemical Engineer Mark Basile Found Nanothermite in WTC Dust watch?v=frIpyTBAV_Y

Explain these deaths, ESPECIALLY the one at 5:58 of this video watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

You pick your fights thats for sure, now prove to me that those beams were cut by demolition crews after the buildings fell. So far you havent put up one link to debunk my claims other than your text messages and your false brain washed beliefs

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Oops! you forgot to say how the remaining standing columns were brought down. I knew you'd try to run away from that so let's try again. Did they come down my magic or did ironworkers bring them down?

So fa, all you'd done is point to videos that anyone can make. Videos =/= evidence. All you've done is intentionally misinterpret nothingness. Mark Basile assisted Harrit/Jones, so he's not independent.

Q: How many demo experts say nanothermite was used?

A: Zero.

[PoetryHound]

I'm still waiting to see the evidence that supposedly incriminates Silverstein of any wrongdoing. All we have the conspiracy kooks is their intentional misinterpretation of two words - "pull it." Is that really all there is? C'mon kooks, haven't you got anything better than that? Anything at all?

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound "pull it" and have it come down in 7 secs, requires weeks of preparation. You dont need a college degree to understand that.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Yep, weeks of preparation in a building used 24/7 by the largest tenant, Solomon Smith Barney. Hey, maybe the demo crews dressed up like brokers all those weeks! Maybe they sneaked the silent, flash-free explosives in under their 3-piece suits!

BTW, "pull it" is not a demo term for bringing down a building with explosives.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound You havent seen this video on how they did it then, it was deleted and now its back up

watch?v=b78j8QBoKwE

Heres more damning evidence

watch?v=R4RMH79nUHw

and sadly, these videos are CONSTANTLY deleted by youtube.

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Same old rehashed paranoia with nothing but suspicions, unsubstantiated assertions, and questions. But no evidence of any "inside job." There are tons of 9/11 conspiracy videos that aren't deleted. All kinds of videos are deleted by YT, usually for containing copyrited material. Stop swallowing the nonsense.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound You expect to get evidence from people in a text box? What kind of evidence is more incriminating than video and photo graphs?? Oh, that's right...someone who is blind.

If you actually take the time to see those videos, you will find Silversteins involvement and his actual increase in insurance benefits if the buildings were destroyed before the attacks.

Here you go, a video that shows a 30 ft steel beam faster than the WTC building falling watch?v=Hn2H4IpHWBM

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II One fragment of an exterior panel falling faster than the rest of the debris? Gee, the ONLY POSSIBLE EXPLANATION must be nano-thermite. Please. The exception doesn't defeat the rule. How come 99% of the debris DIDN'T "explode?" How many demo experts in the world say there's evidence of explosives? Zero. Anyone can make a video and make any claims they want. That's not evidence. What was Silverstein's profit? Zero. All insurance payouts have gone to rebuilding.

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound You have to be really blind to not see more debris shooting out. Here is another video that shows more shooting out. All the floors EXPLODED OUTWARDS. There wasnt enough jet fuel to cover all the floors like most of you debunkers claim "went down the elevator shaft"

This video shows the great amount of force exploding out of the building

watch?v=V0tzmGgWggg

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Well, you got one thing right: "great amount of force." Yep, there was tremendous kinetic energy in the collapses. But were the ejections caused by explosives? Which demo expert says so? None. Not one in the world. I've searched. All I could find is one explosives loader for CDI, but he wasn't even a demo expert.

And yes, jet fuel did go down elevator shafts and blow out elevators on lower floors. Why is that so hard to believe?

[DarkDragon187II]

@PoetryHound You said "jet fuel did go down elevator" You fail to acknowledge that Building 7 HAD NO PLANE HIT IT SO HOW DID IT GET JET FUEL IN THEIR LOBBY!!!!!! how thick headed are you guys?? its insane.

There were sound tests done when building 7 came down and you can CLEARLY HEAR explosives going off. Heres the video watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg

Demo crews have videos of their findings of the bent steel frames and findings of thermite too here is a video watch?v=M08fElQiyi4

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II You raised the elevator issue in the context of discussing the ejections from the twin towers. When I respond that there was indeed jet fuel that went down the elevators, you suddenly switch o WTC 7 and pretend I was talking about WTC 7. It's as if you can't focus on one topic at a time. Got ADHD?

Which demo expert says the sounds you imagine were explosives really were explosives?

[PoetryHound]

@DarkDragon187II Yes, of course there was bent steel. Why wouldn't there be? No, there was no thermite found by demo crews. Which demo crews said they found thermite? None.

See, it's pathetically easy for anyone to make up any claim they want or intentionally misinterpret nothingness as being significant (Ooooh, bent steel!!! Aha!!!). But what do the demo crews say about thermite? What do demo experts say about those ejections? Got any actual answers or just more amateur videos?

[getbo]

LARRY SILVERSTEIN needs to be PULLED !!!!

[getbo]

Kerry admitted that it was a controlled DEMO!

Why hasn't this been looked into?

That means that the building was pre-wired for demolition because a demo of that size would take weeks if not months to plan.

Kerry admits that the WTC destruction was premeditated.

INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB

INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB INSIDE JOB !!

[MrDuspaghi]

John Kerry is a Skull&Bones member, sorry.

[scottttt24]

it wasn't a danger.......... Nothing hit it!

[Earthling31]

Search for ---- 777 ALAJE CHANNEL

And watch his 14 video's with teachings and truth

Much Love and Light

Eartling31

[IranContraScumDid911]

They "did it in a controlled fashion ....." straight from the horses mouth.

[WillSee11]

John Kerry was informed that his grandfather was Jewish and had the name of Kohn..He said "I didn't know that. hmm interesting?" Kerry's family changed their name and converted to Roman Catholicism. John Kerry attended Jesuit schools overseas for most of his life, then became a frat brother of the Bush Crime Family at Skull and Bones. He is still a Jesuit agent for the black pope to this day, and he seems to have very little memory of even winning the 2004 Presidential election. Believe this?

[hahaboyx3]

ohh john gets very nervous when the guy mentions about larry silverstein, trynna find the proper lies to explain, ha its like every single time! last time he was interviewed by another man about bohemian grove, he also got very nervous before answering, ppl who r not stupid know clearly something is not right and hes definitely hiding something! and that leads u to research about these conspiracy theories or facts if u will. ;)

[OurLordLennon]

HOLY SHIT!?? THEY DID IT IN A CONTROLLED FASHION! THE OFFICIAL STORY IS BUILDING 7 CAME DOWN DUE TO FIRE? SOUNDS LIKE A CONFESSION OF CORRUPTION & INTENTIONAL DESTRUCTION TO ME!? THE WHOLE EVENT....ALL THE BUILDINGS & THE "OFFICIAL" STORY OF THEIR DESTRUCTION IS SO FULL OF HOLES IT IS UNCANNY! AND THE FEDS RUN RUN RUN FROM ANY REAL RE-INVESTIGATION! AGAIN PROOF OF THEIR INTENTIONAL EVASION OF PROOF THE TRUTH SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE & LOGIC! 9/11 WAS DEFINITELY AN INSIDE JOB & ALL HUMANITY IS NEXT!

[55mandreck]

@OurLordLennon /

love is the answer.....but we need to take these folks right out of the picture befor the next attack it is very late in the day people should demand that a ; good as they get, politician like MICHAEL MEACHER's concerns are adressed and fully answered - please google him as he put's the case so well about London Bombings 7/7 and 9/11 ...

Time we stopped worrying about our what may happen to us if we speak out - what will happen if we all shut up ... keep on SHOUTING THE TRUE

[PrivationProductions]

why is everyone so pissed at truthers... just play along until these very important questions get addressed. What in the world is passing through a truther-hater's mind. I swear to god.

[Theoneguy2011]

@PrivationProductions why is everyone so pissed at truthers because you spreading shit about great people.

[UsaqaMadeek]

Fucking morons. He was obviously referring to the remaining wall of WTC 6 they pulled with cables because it was too dangerous for anyone to work close to the damaged bldg.

Not exactly a secret to anyone who has read anything about 9-11, though the Truthie Cult seems blissfully unaware.

The term "pulled" has no meaning whatsoever in professional demolition, aside from pulling down a dangerous structure with cables.

Ten yrs, and you clowns still can't find one example of another use.

[yewutube]

@UsaqaMadeek

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ­Z.



[farticlephysicist]

These assholes all need to stand trial.

[faithm]

I remember hearing that it was brought down on purpose, then later, a year or two later they were saying it simply came down. It kind of baffled me and I doubted whether I heard it, but my guy did too so we knew it was at least broadcast that they were doing it on purpose. I didn't know at the time how long it would take to set up a controlled demolition.

[ripmeanewon]

Where are the "black boxes", now that the iron was quietly recycled in China into a ship already?

[djbell219]

um. the guy says there was a wall removed. he didn't know which retarded conspiracy theory the asker was talking about. did any moron truther already say "inb4 photo of 7 with giant freaking hole in it?" because if not, google "picture of wtc 7 with giant freaking hole in it." just sayin.

[farticlephysicist]

@djbell219 Sure, maybe part of the building was missing (perhaps because of the first rounds of demolition).

BUT, to bring down a building all the way, you'd have to spend weeks setting up the charges, so having the building "pulled" for safety reasons is bogus and concretely proves that there was foreknowledge. Foreknowledge, before any kind of grand conspiracy is involved, is enough to charge our government with murder.

[UsaqaMadeek]

@farticlephysicist "you'd have to spend weeks setting up the charges"

WEEKS??? Are you fucking nuts?

It took MONTHS to rig the biggest CD in history, a fraction of this size, not hidden & done in full public view, working 16 hrs a day.

And this was after the bldg was completely stripped out & empty, and none of the work had to be carefully hidden from sight of thousands of workers.

[mmaier2112]

But wait a second, I thought conspiracy theorists were all insane because it takes DAYS to plan and execute a controlled demolition?

How did they do it in mere hours?

/s

[Nickalispicalis]

They couldn't deny the obvious anymore.

[PoetryZound]

"he rubbed his nose"

GUILTY!!!!!!

[ryanwilliammac]

and donald rumsfeld is guilty aswell. also larry silverstein is guilty aswell

[ryanwilliammac]

he rubbed his nose when he was talking and his body was moving side to side on the spot. his voice wasn't clear and conscise. these are all key things that happen to someone when they are lying to people. everyone in the government apart from ron paul is responsible for 9/11 but the biggest ones are george bush, dick cheney, condela rice, head of cia, fbi, new york fire department, head of faa and boeing, head of nsa, head of new york police department and the heads of illuminaty

[PoetryHound]

Baselss true-because-I-say-so proclamations you pulled out of your ass.

[WurDaKashAt]

good post until your list of the "biggest ones"

[dano555666]

Fuck me, this opens up a whole wider than the one put in JFKs crown.

Only in our modern world could truth be so coldly ignored. If this kind of fuckup were performed in the 60's people would have marched on washington with sledgehammers.

Disgusting.

[blackplastic7]

Only hippies would, and no one cared about them.

[ezrabiggins]

A thousand long-haired kids in 1968 with sledgehammers? You damn well would care. Now the owners have the kids' hands busy and ears stuffed with me myself and I-podphones. I, Pod. Stay connected, dude. What's the old saying about the sledgehammer shapes the hand? Now, in the event your comment was intended as irony, I apologize for getting snooty. If it wasn't, I still don't want to be snooty. But damn! The workers and kids and profs in this country are permanently numbed.

[Koshkesh88]

0:47 touching nose is a sign of lies

[blackplastic7]

Wow, seriously dude? Touching your nose is a sign of nervousness or tension.

[ezrabiggins]

So 'they did it in a controlled fashion'??? We've been told it collapsed of its own accord (copycat collapse). Now it was controlled demolition? Who placed the explosives?? When?? Just how long does that take?? Any reporters in this country???????

[WurDaKashAt]

you are starting to exit the cave my friend.

[ezrabiggins]

Yo Kash. Friend indeed. But I've been shivering out here for a long time. Shadow: We have a real chance of getting a neutral investigation of 9-11, and the politicians very well may -- behind Saints Paul and Dennis -- crack the case open. Blinding sunlight: "I don't believe a fucking thing my govt tells me. Not a fucking thing. Not a fucking thing " --George Carlin. And our chances? "They own you. They fucking own you. It's a big club, and you ain't in it." --GC again. To the streets now?

[ufo5147]

His answer was legit and reasonable and true.. this video does the opposite of what it's aiming to do

[longislandz]

This begs the question what does sen. kerry mean by "that wall"

[lonchecaliente]

Thanks for posting this!!

[Traynorcustomreverb]

One can get carried away with conspiracy.

Very carried away.

[PoetryHound]

I love it. So now John Kerry is part of the plot. The ever-expanding plot that has a cast of thousands, not one of whom has ever come forward or leaked anything about the supposed "inside job." Sure, that just makes a lot of sense. Looks like Kerry probably meant WTC 6, which was indeed pulled over with cables.

[log140]

i would say john kerry just confessed 911 was an inside job!!!

[merrimac291]

9/11 represents both how evil and incompetent out government has become: evil because they killed thousands of Americans. Incompetent because they fucked up on building 7.

[SPOOKSTR]

That dude has a massive head.

[zetetic0void]

Interesting... from what I saw from a top expert on demolition, rigging that building (with some fires still burning inside too!) within that time allotment that day would have been exceedingly difficult to pull off if at all possible. In my opinion, it is controlled demolition but just not setup that day ;-)

Interesting that the BBC had a news report 20 minutes before building 7 collapsed that it had collapsed even though it is still plainly visible in back of the reporter LOL.

[spudzoutawadena]

yes danny jowenko top dutch demo expert says its controlled demo..NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. look him up

[jeffmo72]

he admits it was pulled!

[Goobyusa]

One last thing (body language), you can see a slight nod of Teresa at the mention of Silverstein AND watch Kerry rub his nose when he is lieing. That wall was in danger? They did it in a controlled fashion? Did what??? Did what???

[55mandreck]

@Goobyusa

yes his body-language speaks volumes - unlike his mouth.. Folded arms, playing his cards close to his chest and talking in a fake calm coke - enhanced tone...that only the slippery no how too how can these men sleep at night ....must need a bucket full of drugs to totally by pass their conscience... off to jail with the lot of these criminals .... how dare they think people are stupid we all know what is going on,.. just time a few more influential people the nerve to stand up.

[Goobyusa]

Nice body language at the mention of Silverstein. He crosses both arms (closing himself off from the question) AND he steps backwards. Hmmmm I wonder if Kerry and Silverstein have enjoyed mutual parties in Nantucket where they both vacation. Kerry clearly knows the bastard.

[Goobyusa]

Both Kerry and Silverstein frequent Nantucket. Hmmmm - are we to believe they don't attend the same parties there?

[Goobyusa]

Nice body language. As soon as Kerry realizes that the question is about WTC 7, his arms lock across his body (closing himself off from the questioner). He then admits that the building was demolished in a "controlled fashion". Since the area was corded off and it takes blueprints and weeks of preparation, HOW did they do it in a controlled fashion? They set it up ahead of time - that's how. 911 was an inside job.

[Goobyusa]

Actually, a more careful observation - John Kerry KNOWS Larry Silverstein. It is the mention of Silverstein where the body language begins. It would be interesting to see if these 2 had earlier connections.

[AshMan32]

funny

[racingdirt18]

Ha Ha Ha!, look at Kerrys wife during the video. She is thinking in her mind, isnt our mind control, flouridation working on these people. Why are they not forgetting 911 and what we did. Ha Ha! Hmmm, mybe there is a higher power than satin. Ha all the elite think they are better than us, but they are not. Wait until they see what is coming for them! Power to the people!

[countdumas]

@racingdirt18 Michael Tsarion is the worlds premier conspiracy researcher/lecturer/author. Dr. Bill Deagle, Jordan Maxwell, Leo Zagami and Alexandre Dumas pere are highly informative as well. Alexandre Dumas pere wrote The man in the Iron mask in 1848 and 'coincidentally' in the same year The Society of Jesu(Jesuits) were expelled from France for the third and last time. The Society of Jesus(Jesuits) have been expelled from 82 countries and ARAMIS IS THE COUNT OF MONTE CHRISTO.

[seth797]

What happened to the Anthrax investigation post 9/11?

Where was the weapons grade Anthrax traced back to?

[godscuttingyoudown]

the independent investigation found that the source was mailing them from the pentagon.

as soon as that was made public the story was dropped from the mainstream news

its incredible how the terrorist broke in and mailed the anthrax letters from the pentagon, i mean who else could have it been.

[revol06]

Maybe it was "dropped from the mainstream news" because what you've posted there never actually happened. Can you point me towards this "independent investigation"? I'd love to see some evidence.

[godscuttingyoudown]

I'm not your dad, I'm not going to do your home worked for you

but if you feel like reading check out 9/11 Synthetic Terror by webster griffin tarpley who is an astute critic of us foreign policy

if you want to be specific the anthrax spores positively matched the spores at fort detrick maryland

but if reading cuts into your beer drinking time you can watch clips from the history channel on you tube

watch?v=IjRHM-0Gvb8&feature=re­lated

watch?v=t0qhhWzW-mM&feature=re­lated

[revol06]

There's a pretty big difference between tracing the spores back to a biofacility (where else would they have come from) and someone "mailing them from the pentagon". That's a massive leap, it's purely speculative and if the media were to report it they'd be misleading everyone.

[gonadmoore]

gee what body language gee he makes me sick.

[algomat]

The body language tells that he knows the trut but lies as far as i know. The arms being folded or whatever it is called and then taking a deep breath. He takes a defensive pisition.

[giantshadows]

silverstein BUILT WTC7 in 1980-

[giantshadows]

"I dont believe there is been a formal investigation..".. "they did it in a controlled fashion".. coincedence theory robots cant admit kerry admits they did it in a controlled fashion, they think kerry is just confused. Or pull it only means with cables. to pull, means to bring it down or perhaps they think silverstein got out there with his F150 and hooked up some cables when he mentions pull it "and we watched the bldg come down".. pull firefighters? often firefighters are referred to as "it"?

[vanNood]

"bring a wall down," what? the whole building was demolished. That takes more than a couple of hours to plan and execute. Watch Kerry bumble out that bullshit answer.

[parrot201]

When Silverstein said "pull", he meant pull the firefighters to prevent death because WTC 7 was in fear of collapse. "To pull" is a demolition term, meaning to actually pull down intentionally with wires, which would not be possible on Building 7. Only small buildings like WTC 6 which they really did "pull" in the clean-up with wires.

[x11115]

Wasn't a steel building with a steel infarstruction. I don't know I'm just asking but would like to know because that's pretty questionable to all the sudden destroy a building even in a terrorist attack it's very questionable. This will go down as a set up if they can't answer this ligitimatly and if silverstien had something to do with it.

[parrot201]

Steel infrastructures collapsed before from FIRE ALONE. Add a Boeing-767 slicing through the upper middle of it at 550 mph with tons of fuel, and you will get an imminent collapse. In the case with WTC 7, its base was severely damaged and some tanks in the building blew up. I was in the building with some architects pre-9/11. Not a surprise it collapsed.

[vanNood]

Are you kidding me?

They're talking about it being "pulled" as in intentionally demolished, it's not even a question that it collapsed on its own in the video. Oh, and no high rise has collapsed from fire alone, ever.

"was in the building with some architects pre-9/11" lies

[parrot201]

You're in denial...

Why would they demolish WTC 7 and not demolish other severely damages buildings in the area? Because WTC 7 COLLAPSED from severe damage and fire, whether you like it or not. "Pull" IS a demolition term to literally PULL down with wires, which can only be done on small buildings. It's funny when people like you think you know what you're talking about when really you have no clue. Go do some real research and get some common sense in this subject.

[gerry301]

I'm confused, is there a problem with his answer? And I really dispise Kerry.

[jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjo]

the official story nevr said "in a controlled fashion. only "structural damage and fire". is that possible? maybe, i dunno. do firemen ever put explosives in a burning highrise to level it as a firefighting tactic? if so, then no problem in my mind. if not......

[gerry301]

I believe they are talking about building 7 that was taken down later. Being in danger of collasping it would be proper to use explosives to bring a wall down in a controlled fashion.