Added: 3 years ago
From: masterfulninja
Views: 131,549
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (246)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice one ABM3152 ! This Searl B.S. has gone on long enough.

    The concept of magnetic generators have been around for many years and

    Now days is it emerging due to high gasoline prices,

    Just go to Google, search for --- Best Magnetic Generator Review ---

    and Click the First Result

  • are you sure we not dealing with an ordinary generator cos im seeing copper and magnets and movement to create electricity just like the one in my car and same old story put energy in to get energy out and i have seen many of these segs but not one fact to prove anything else.....I think you space trippers might be wasting our time!

  • this is starting to seem like a massive scam as surely the team should have had something real and credible to show us by now but instead we get an endless amount of speculation i am loosing faith very fast that this will turn out to be beneficial to you and me but instead a lot of misguided hope and a lot of waisted time id love to be proved wrong but i get the feeling it aint gunna happen.........waiting......wa­iting........still waiting

  • Nice one ABM3152 ! This Searl B.S. has gone on long enough. If we all keep up the pressure on these vids someone in a u-tube office somewhere might come to their senses and block all their illicit content and halt the progress of the scamming scum 'team searl'! They should be put in stocks for us all to throw our rotten veg at !

  • As you can all see by the way I submit my comments,

    I cannot stand people that constantly bullshit like these SEG fuckwits.

    They have been do this bullshit for fucken 60 years and they are still at it, with their most pathetic explanations, and still fucken nothing to show.

    John Searl and his SEG team are absolute FuckWits

    Thank you

  • show us the real thing doing some real work

  • YouTube is going dwn the tubes due to SCAMMERS like BullShitCaptain

  • @larryllix Indeed. But the sad thing is he has been doing this since long before youtube ever came into existance. What is worse is that there are many organizations which claim to take action against such people which have knowen about him since that time and have done absolutely nothing about it. Our various anti-fraud organizations are just sitting on their asses and watching instead of actually being usefull.

  • You forgot to show the 3 standing magnetic fields produced by the cylinders.

  • Fraud investigation teams will be deployed in approx 8-10 weeks. If these YouTube scams on free energy devices are found guilty in obtaining funds in any way through lies or deception, All personal assets will be permanently confiscated from all parties involved. You either come clean and notify all You Tuber's by  video uploaded confession. You have been WARNED.

    Look Out

  • look like a flying saucer

  • @yun514 Yea there is a reason for that. This machine was never designed to function but rather to make people believe that it functioned. The UFO shape was chosen because the con man behind this scam is trying to claim that UFO sightings over a town called warminster in the 1960's where actually his test flights being witnessed from the ground. However, Mr. Searl (the con man in question) being a moron failed to notice the eye witness accounts describe a four pointed star shape not a disk.

  • @MrAwsome514 i agree with you , so that why they could travel out of space using infini energy as long they dont crash :D sorry my english is not pretty good

  • @MrAwsome514 You are ignorant.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Ofcourse I am. Ignorance means you do not know about something. How can I know something that you refuse to tell me? I ask you to post the flight footage and for over 20 months now you completely refuse to do so. I ask you to explain how it is supposed to work and instead you direct me to your website and suggest that I buy one of your books... I downloaded a pirated copy instead. It was all plagerized from grade school text books and rearranged to look more significant any way.

  • @Beamshipcaptain No, no, no, the proper way to call someone ignorant is to say "Yous ignant!"

  • @Beamshipcaptain Well in that case beamie I would have to say you better start saying it that way because you just described yourself, John Searl, and pretty much the rest of the... You know what I am not even going to dignify your other cohorts with a proper mention.

  • @Beamshipcaptain I see my witty statement's meaning has gone unnoticed, so I shall rectify this immediately! By calling someone ignorant for no reason, you act as if you, yourself is uneducated. (breeding really has nothing to do with it, honestly)

  • @Beamshipcaptain You really should consider making some apologies. After all you are arrogant, ignorant, a fraud, well... just an absolutely horrible person really...

  • You can make it more accurate by putting a disclaimer in it: "Does not actually create energy from nowhere"

  • there is validity to this, like it or not, top secret or not...

    ahead of most minds time for anti-gravity robots \ this vid is just a mockup of the feasibility of actual technology that exists, whether you have a mind to grasp it or not.

    and you are going to tell me there are not aliens living underground in NewMexico.

    And that biological matter cannot move the speed of light. uh-huh, disbeliever.

  • @HHammerHeadD So there is validity to a 60 year old scam being run by an old coot who happens to hold a conviction for electricity theft decades after claiming to have invented and built about 40 fully functional free energy generators? Did I mention he admitted to the charges? It is all in the court records man... Do you still think there is validity to this one? If so I have nearly a dozen other interesting convictions he has had that seem to indicate otherwise.

  • @MrAwsome514 validity in itself can not refute a theory and if this test is conducted many times and yields similar results which is clear from other video's found on youtube, even though some are failures but then again not all early experiments are successes? if similar results for over-unity generators are continually found it would be absolutely unscientific to overlook these claims, the validity isn't there but there is reliability and it at least deserves some looking over.

  • @thinkstrait If the tests where being perfomred by multiple individuals whom where not directly connected to eachother then there would be more reason to trust the claims. However, this is not the case. Only John Searl and his associates have been performing the tests and their results are not being published by them. Furthermore his own son claims to have witnessed him fake the majority of evidence he has of his earlier "work". We clearly have a lone con artist.

  • @MrAwsome514 His son is lying. Many tests were performed in the Early 1970s by Sussex University.

  • @MrAwsome514 Professor Searl never stole any electricity, he did not have to. And in the end, the court agreed with him, and said he did not owe the Midlands any money. Get your facts straight, and stop your mendacities.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Beamie... I have been over this with you dozens of times. The court records are open to the public. You can lie as many times about it as you like but the fact remains that he was not only convicted of the electricity theft but according to the court record he admitted to the charge. Anyone can find the court record and read it for them selves. How do you plan to win an argument with such documentation readily available to your opposition?

  • @Beamshipcaptain The court records are open to the public beamie. Anyone can easily look it up for themselves and see that I am the one telling the truth here. When you argue against facts that have such strong supporting evidence as court records to back them up you not only prove yourself to be a lier but an idiot aswell.

  • Where you guys aware that this machine is claimed to be capable of producing current up to 1.5 gigawatts? To put that into perspective if it ran for 1 hour that is about $180,000 worth in electricity produced during each hour of operation. If it ran all day it would come to about $4,320,000 worth. With that said... Why does Searl need to rely on investors to fund his "research" when he could just sell the power the prototype produces?

  • Comment removed

  • sorry to burst your bubble, but ring magnets don't have a magnetic field that looks like a sphere and they dont overlap like your video shows, so it doesn't show an accurate representation of the magnetic flux of the device.

  • I want to see it connected to nothing but a light on its outputs, and no other wires. Maybe a remote tachometer so you can check speed of it without the connection of wires. I'm an electrician and have also done experiments with magnets- all to no prevail. No over-unity. Now a friend has paid $50 for "blueprints" to build one of these SEG's. We will see. What "funding" is needed to build a small one and say "well there it is and it works"? Power co. would fork over millions for rights to it.

  • @1roughneck5150 Se what connected to nothing but lights?

    .

    Ohhhh... the computer graphic!! LOL

  • I want to see it connected to nothing but a light on its outputs, and no other wires. Maybe a remote tachometer so you can check speed of it without the connection of wires. I'm an electrician and have also done experiments with magnets- all to no prevail. No over-unity. Now a friend has paid $50 for "blueprints" to build one of these SEG's. We will see. 

  • Just mark the video as "FRAUD".

    I have.

    .

    Keep YouTube healthy and clear of this garbage and deception.

  • @Beamshipcaptain - I am reading a very thorough book published by the Smithsonian Institute "Flight - The Complete History". Amazing book that covers all aspect of flight but strangely they didn't mention Searl's alleged flights. Lots of mention of Edwards Air Force base - but no IGVs. No mention of flights allegedly captured by the BBC in the UK. My conclusion is the IGV stuff is all made up by Searl & he is creating a fake history. Have you actually bothered to check his faked stories?

  • @LiamXaoh Just for your own satisfaction I urge you to go to Searl's website and read his "Law of Squares". If you have any doubt of complete lunacy after that I would send Searl (care of beamshitcaptain) $100,000 to support his stay in the mental institution...LOL

    .

    All the best

  • @Beamshipcaptain - I have spent numerous hours looking for independent evidence of Searl's alleged working SEG/IGV. LOts of the information seems to come from a common source. A few obviously fake photos or static shots of work in progress. This is like most other energy scams. Lots of techno-babble. Lots of faked history. So I assume we'll soon hear lots of excuses for the delayed unveiling of a working device - then further set-backs/sabotage and mysterious Govt agents, then nothing...

  • @LiamXaoh You have done nothing. You are a crazy person. This work has been done and is done for you. You will unerstand the Searl technology if you go online and study the law of the SQUARES, the key to Searl effect free energy and artificial gravity. This work is done out of LOVE. And its done for YOU, so YOU won't have to blow your life savings on energy bills, and gasoline, which jumped 10-cents last week. Learn about the technology while we demonstrate it, and rebuild it.

  • @Beamshipcaptain yep its all for just send cheques cash or money order to........

  • @LiamXaoh The information comes from all different sources. Most notable is the BBC weekly TV programmes from 1968-72 on the Searl technology, the numerous engineers, sientists and laborers and volunteers who helped build and fly the IGVs all over the world with 12 meter band, the vice-admiral of Great Britain, two British policement who witnessed the flights and drew the Probe six exactly, Edwards AFB who tested an IGV model. Study the Law of the Squares. Where were you when we demoed in NM ?

  • @Beamshipcaptain - all empty words without a shred of proof. I have looked for evidence of the alleged flights from as many sources as possible - it is only Searl and his believers that claim it happened. I have looked in many books (by reputable publishers) on flight, encyclopaedias and today a newspaper database and found not one mention. So for such an historic thing as an IGV, it has gone entirely unrecorded by the press and historians. You are part of the lie or blind to the truth.

  • @LiamXaoh Unrecorded? Keithshepmp and MILLIONS of Britishers remember the weekly Searl Team programmes! A plethora of media sources! LIFE Magazine, 1968. Hants and Berks Gazette, 1969. BBC1, WEEKLY programes. THousands of witnesses to the Sunday flights, and in Warminster. @ British police officers witnessed and drew what they saw, and it was the Probe-6. NASA knows about the work thru Dr. Arthur Cain. A P-11 tested at Edwards here in California in 1977. Testing at Sussex university, 1970s.

  • @Beamshipcaptain - more like @Captaincopy&paste.

    Until you provide a date of the launch I won't be interested in your standard responses.You keep avoiding that particular question which means your credibility is seriously in doubt.

  • @LiamXaoh Why? Can you predict when funding will come thru?

  • @Beamshipcaptain - I'm going to keep that excuse for later on. So you are working on an unfunded project with no delivery dates? LOL.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Funding was an issue when he built the big one back in 1965. The senior's pensions didn't go far enough, I guess.

    .

    Gawddamn thieves!

  • @Beamshipcaptain And yet the Nd2Fe14B compound which is what neodymium magnets are made of was not invented until 1982 by the General Motors Corporation and Sumitomo Special Metals. So can you explain to me just how it is that Jhon Searl got his hands on neodymium magnets 32 years before they where invented?

  • @Beamshipcaptain and where would that craft be now ...it would surely still be housed somewhere ????

  • @Beamshipcaptain ..and all the witnesses are scared to come forward because thay are afraid the big oil companies will oil and feather them, right?

    .

    IDIOT! How stupid do you think people with money are?

  • @Beamshipcaptain Oh and Beamie I allready stated that BBC denies ever filming the SEG, IGV, or even any thing in reguards to Mr. Searl at all. And any one can confirm for themselves that the BBC footage does not exist thanks to BBC being kind enough to allow access to thier archives through thier website.

  • @MrAwsome514 Nevertheless, a cursory search turned up-BBC ARCHIVES- MASTERCLIP: 2B00227A1...xxx Searl Programmme footage. And Keithshem on YouTube remembers the Searl BBC programmes, and many other Britishers over the age of 45 remeber them as well.

  • @Beamshipcaptain What part of BBC denies ever filming this crap do you not get? And maybe you missed the part about it being abscent from the BBC archives which are publicly available at thier website. Any half retarded 3rd grader could verify this information for themselves. The video does not exist. Keithshem is just a damn puppet and not a damn person in the world over 45 seems to recall any of this. If you wanna prove me wrong though post the video to your youtube account.

  • @MrAwsome514 Then all the milliohns of people in Britain who remember the BBC programmes are delusional, and the footage I have had on VHS of some of the early 1970s (I was a teenager in the early 1970s) BBC programmes since late 1993 is in my imagination? You are so bent, its funny! Much of the BBC footage is on YouTube for the past 3 years!

  • @Beamshipcaptain No flight video of the IGV is on youtube. The only thing which turns up on youtube are slide shows and Searl's story telling sessions. Tell you what since you just claimed to have the footage on VHS how about you prove that it is not in your imagination. Get it into a digital format and upload it to your youtube channel. Since the footage does not seem to turn up any where else I guess you must have the last copy. You owe it to your supporters after all don't you agree?

  • @larryllix Stupid enough not to notice that neodymium magnets where not invented untill 20-30 years after Searl claims to have been using them in his machines. I say 20-30 because Searl also can not seem to make up his mind about which decade he built it in. Sometimes he says 1950 sometimes he says 1965. Hell one time I even saw him say 1942... He was 14 in 1942. And ofcourse he claims the first one cost him 12 million british pounds... So yea he thinks we are pretty damn stupid.

  • @Beamshipcaptain cant find any reference on sussex uni database concerning john searle or s.e.g....why would that be

  • You copy and paste the same unsubstantiated rubbish. So when exactly is it the IGV going to fly in public? Simple question.  When exactly is the SEG going to be built and tested by an independent panel? (Hint: Never)

  • @LiamXaoh As soon as we get funding. Then we need the money for a level six square SEG. Then wee need facilities and tools and hiring labor to build. Do the math. How long will it take after funding to build any large project. Jeez... THis isnt rocket science.

  • @Beamshipcaptain -"this isn't rocket science" LOL. So if it is that simple when is it going to happen? Talk about creative avoidance.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Why do you have over a dozen names on YouTube?.

    Your various names are easy to spot. They are the only ones that agree with you!

  • @larryllix I only have ONE name on Youtube. Those others are my "fans".

  • @Beamshipcaptain your right its not rocket science ,,, its bullshit

  • @Beamshipcaptain who is the vice admiral of britain??/ what is a 12 metre band??? never saw anything on bbc concerning seg... law of squares ???uh

  • @Beamshipcaptain correct....i cannot remember the weekly BBC Searl programmes , or the snsrc's work ;;;; but then again ,neither can anyone else except your buddy mr keithSHAM,,,,probably as they,didnt happen/,.if there is footage existing could you upload it,,, i would be quite interested..

  • @Beamshipcaptain One would think in 50 years of research and taking money from pensioners that Searl and your sock puppets would have produced a product of some kind other than a fantasy DVD movie for $50.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Hmm... Judging by the fact that four of your comments have been voted down to the point of becomming hidden and all of the comments opposing you have been voted up I conclude that people are not buying the story you are telling.

  • @MrAwsome514 BullShitCaptain is a "hit" collector. He uses many nicknames here and is a complete fraud working for Searle. His claims discredit his own claims over the last years.He is a complete moron that can't keep a story straight...and all for what? Sellling copies of of the Searl Story for $49 that can be downloaded free on the bit torrent sites. Get one and watch it then you will realize what mental nutcase this guy really is. Better yet go to searle's sie and read "law of squares"

  • @larryllix Oh yes I have allready seen it and I have allready read all about his "law" of the squares. He should have become a comedian instead I really feel it would have suited him.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Call me crazy but... I think the negative reaction you get may have something to do with the insulting tone you take with any one who questions what you say. You know... real scientists generally expect that they will be asked to prove thier claims and happily provide such proof upon request. You however... insult any one who asks questions about the machine, blame thier lack of knowledge about YOUR "research" on them, and provide excuses as to why you can not show them proof.

  • @larryllix

    That account may be a fraud, but the machine isn't. It is real and is the result of an inventor wanting to increase the efficiency of normal generators. If enough power is drawn its weight changes...

    Have a good day :)

  • @Nabo00o You better make up you rmind. The last ferw reports say it generates unlimited eletrcial energy, then flies and gets really cold.

    It is all a crock of BS and anybody claiming otherwise is a complete fraud and a liar.

  • @larryllix

    I like your totalitarian attitude, very entertaining but very pointless to communicate with.

    Be well.

  • @Nabo00o Let me put this into perspective for you ok. Searl claims his prototype generates 1.5 gigawatts of electricity. To help you understand just how much electricity that is if it ran for a full day it will have produced a whopping $4,320,000 worth in electricity. Searl also claims to have built 40 additional units into his IGVs combined the output per day is worth $177,120,000. That comes to $5,387,400,000 per month and $64,648,800,000 per year

  • @Nabo00o With that said... If searl's machine can generate such an impressive amount of electricity and he claims to have built so many of them why has he not converted them into a power plant and started to sell the electricity they produce? It would clearly bring in far more money for his "research" as he calls it than his current method of begging on youtube and at free energy conventions. The only logical answer as to why is that it is fake and therefore he cannot do it.

  • @Nabo00o If you support anything of this nature you do yourself a great discredit. It demonstrates a physical science understanding under a grade 4 level = moron.

    .

    Why not imagine generating gold or other precious metals? They may pay off more in the SCAM market. Oh yes...I keep forgetting...you don't deal with anything that isn't abstract to the public.

  • @larryllix THis is no fraud. The work has been brought back from the brink of ruthless suppression, and will directly benefit you in your life, for it spells the END of expensive dirty energy, and the final dissemination of cheap clean, non-grid energy, and propulsion.

  • "All animated devices achieve perpetual motion & over-unity states, real devices obey the laws of physics and slow to a stop as they always will " Adam Peenum

  • @Beamshipcaptain - I believe Adam was referring to over-unity devices and perpetual motion machines. The sun and atoms don't fit those categories - a man of your many talents would should know that.

  • @Beamshipcaptain - you need to go read a dictionary to understand perpetual motion. It means forever.  Nothing much in our universe mimics a perpetual motion MACHINE - where more energy comes out than goes in.

    Name one thing in nature that is anything like an over-unity machine.

    You are now showing your ignorance.

  • @Beamshipcaptain - they are not over unity systems. You are too caught up in your blind faith. Do you even know what over-unity is?

  • @LiamXaoh They certainly are! Ball lightning is a classic example. And I never have blind faith, I read, do research and talk to prople. Something you do not do. I am head of R & D for Searl Aerospace, Inc. Incorporated in the great state of Nevada, May, 2010.

  • @Beamshipcaptain - now you are being just plain arrogant. Have you done an energy balance study on ball lightning? You are really now losing all credibility.

  • @LiamXaoh You are a very negative individuaol. You can lead a horse to water... THis technology is to SUPPORT you, not bring you down!

  • @Beamshipcaptain - if you're in charge you should be able to give us rational folks some idea of when the first flying saucer powered by a SEG device is launched. I'll be sure to watch the evening news to see it race to the clouds and back in 5 seconds.

    I don't expect a sensible answer but I thought I would try one last time.

  • @LiamXaoh Searl Magnetics, Inc. just opened up in California We need the SEG , and a level six square SEG (6-element for fantastic-powerlevels). The SEG is the thing that flies. THe IGV is just a body flight-frame for control. So just as soon as we get funding, we are on the road back to the IGVs, of which 42 were built and flown at fantastic speeds with 12-meter band radio control, 1954-1978. There is even an article about the Searl levity discs in LIFE magazine (USA) 1968.

  • @Beamshipcaptain - I see on another video you suggest the Newman motor is an example of a "succesful" motor - when I searched for info I found it had been officially tested it was less than 100% (as predicted by sensible folk) - and way less than claimed. I researching info on the Bedini (one of your suggested working devices) and so far nothing suggests it works as promised.

  • @LiamXaoh Nothing you research or experiment with is going to work because you expect failure.

  • @Beamshipcaptain no.... LiamXaoh just expects the truth,,,,,,i know that must be a foreign concept down there at the bustling searle bullshit engineering complex

  • @LiamXaoh Bedini makes battery chargers and rejuvenators, nothing more. The overunity is claimed by the nut-jobs.

  • @larryllix - I have never really been sure of what Bedini devices actually do in terms of power in vs power out. I have read some many vague versions I don't know what to believe. The weight of web info seems to suggest his stuff is over-unity - but I'll take your word that it isn't claimed by him. I'll keep looking.

  • @LiamXaoh It was launched a few decades ago except they can't find it and nobody saw it and there are no documents from it.

    The unit flew from England to Australia in less than two seconds, controlled by Ham Radio operator's signals.

    .

    When a unit travels faster than a radio wave, how can a ham radio signal control it?

    .

    You decide!

  • @larryllix Id did not fly from England to Austrialia in 2 seconds. None of the flights around the Earth or in orbit were faster than light. In the Atmosphere we are limited to 4000 mph.

  • @Beamshipcaptain You need to keep a straight story. Every detail, when questioned, changes to defend the fantasy.

  • @Beamshipcaptain "Searl Aerospace"? hahahahahahahahahaha!

    .

    Searl AirHeads more likely.

  • @larryllix This work is done for YOU.

  • @Beamshipcaptain head of R&D at searle aerospace ???so when is your next appointment at the local welfare centre,,, thay may be able to find you a job.

  • @LiamXaoh "over-unity" is a new name for "perpetual motion" since the average person knows that is a hoax and they had to get a new name to sell it to the uneducated.

  • @Beamshipcaptain basic physics score "f-"

  • @Beamshipcaptain "something that cannot be done with heat-energy"? and what exactly are you talking about? Do you not understand that all forms of energy eventually end up as thermal energy? This is why friction is the enemy of these kinds of devices and why they never work.

  • @iHeartElectricalEng There is no heat, and no friction, and no noise in the Law of the Squares, Neodymium cored, Searl SEG. It also runs COLD, and outputs NEGATIVE STATE COLD CURRENT. Read about the SEG. I have studied it intensively since summer, 1986.

  • @Beamshipcaptain could you explain the so called law of the squares?////

  • @Beamshipcaptain I can not help but notice you answered his question by advertizing your product... Ofcourse that is something you do all the time beamie.

  • @Beamshipcaptain yeah i had a dream like that ....i really thought i could fly and defy gravity,, it was great!! unfortunately i woke up and realised it was just a dream ....seems your good MR Searl is still dreaming!!

  • Comment removed

  • @Beamshipcaptain I dont care if you've won the nobel prize for physics and went to a strip show with Richard Feynman ,,,,,,,science is about producing results to back your theories/ideas......so far you have'nt.!!

  • @Beamshipcaptain and these demonstrations are available on you tube????

  • @mugwamp4 Yes they are.

  • @Beamshipcaptain what i saw on the youtube upload was more of the same ,,,,,little metal cylinders spinning around a copper ring by means of electromagnetic induction ...micheal faraday could,ve rigged this up 160 years ago,,,please !!! simply show this contraption converting its" endless "  "free" energy into a force capable of doing something....

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Beamshipcaptain By the way beamie I have found some footage from 1965 of people's reactions to the UFO sighting in warminster. The sighting which searl claims to have actually been the test flight for the IGV supposidly made using the SEG. In this footage the object was described as being the shape of a four pointed star. Searl claims his IGV is a disk shape. Clearly what ever it was they saw was not the IGV.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Bull shit. By the way... I never said the eye witnesses only saw it at night. Some of them saw it during the day and still described a star shape. Care to try another explaination here? Cause the explaination I have is that the people of warminster saw some crazy shit in the 60's and then Searl came in later claiming it was his imaginary IGV. Ofcourse I say imaginary because you have still failed to rise to the challenge I issued 6 months ago of posting flight footage.

  • I can attest that these devices are genuine and significant contributions to science. I find them to be indispensable in my work of re-animating previously animated subjects. Place one Searl branded SEG device embedded at the base of the brain stem and the subject of interest will arise from the operating table and follow nearly every verbal instruction given to it. I say 'nearly every' for some instructions, such as "immerse yourself in that vat of acid", must be emphasized with a solid push.

  • There are some People on the Net who are Clearly Trying very hard to Undermind the Free Energi Devices. They always come with the most creasy and Boring Comments about the free energi doesnt exist and so on. What i really want to know is how much money they get!!? Dont they know that they are helping EVIL!!? How about Their Children. their children has to live in this world too!!!?

  • @Ebdan88 "There are some People on the Net who are Clearly Trying very hard to Undermind the Free Energi Devices"... Yeah they are called high school graduates.

  • @jib1000 Thoes High School that you talk about isnt the Being High in the Scholl, because i think that is what you mean :-). Brother havent you Look Around lately or what!!? Didnt you see how they Crashed the two men who came up with the ColdFusion, and now today Very soon we wil have Cell's which needs changing once every 5-10 years, and they will produce 100's and 100's times more energi!!? Please Research, and Help Awaken the Sleepy Ones.....!!? :-)

  • @Ebdan88 I can barely even read what you just wrote. Seems like someone needs to go back to school.

    I guess you don't understand how fuel cells work huh?

  • @Ebdan88 : It is fools like you that allow these immoral scammers to perpetuate their irrational claims. Regarding money, ooOOOooo, its all a BIG conspiracy eh? HAhahaa, that is the biggest admission of lack of education I've came accross here on u-t! Oh, they must be getting PAID for putting down the free energy nutters !!?? I mean WTF planet are you ON?? MONEY cannot BUY COMMON SENSE or KNOWLEDGE my uneducated friend. YOU go and discover true knowledge by testing and recording results.....

  • @Ebdan88 Supplementary to that, only when YOU have done that, YOU will discover the usual 'traits' that are employed by the perpertators of such wild claims which give rise to the 'thinking out the box' nonsense and 'big-oil' conspiricies and other gobbledeegook which is usually flung in there to psychologically outwit the unwitting !!! You have seriously embaressed yourself. Please don't reply, just go and do some basic physics and SEE beyond the lunacy of the loonatics.....

  • First law of thermodynamics rules. There aint no such thing as a free lunch. Go out und get a proper job buddy.

  • The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so. . . . .

    Louis Pasteur

  • The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so. . . . .

    Louis Pasteur

  • There is no way that the rollers can roll if the rings are stationary you idiots. If you believe over unity can be achieved then you're a fool.

  • My research proves that almost all overunity devices draw their extra energy from the potential energy of the local gravitational field. And to describe them in full scientific detail, it is required to revise the Maxwells equations of Electromagnetism to no-linear equations, and Einstein's theory of gravitation. So for the academic world to account for them it? is required 1-3 nobels...

  • HAS ANYONE HEAR