Ufo Crash Want A Closer Look Well So Did I Here Ya Go

[MrToiletface]

k. i thought this was a ufo too, but in the video it passes in FRONT of the hydrotowers, not behind them. its a trick of perspective. i dont know what it is, maybe a clay disk or something, but it aint a ufo. even the fragments are in front of the powerlines. pause it at the exact second the thing whizzes by the towers, and you will see in plain sight that it is in front of them, and is actually a small object close to the camera, not a large one far away. ufos are real but this video is not...

[isurfvan]

i dont think this is steel or any material from our planet.... i dont htink we can even begin to understand hte technology behind this thing

[coaking]

rocket :)

[gspanked]

it was chuck norris

[R4vetastic]

This could be a ufo, as well It may just be the flare from a rocket, with no explosive warhead, which is why it bounced. But the metaloid debris makes me think it's a ufo.

[boogertait]

THAT DRIVES ME CRAZY EVERY TIME I SEE IT.. IT'S NOT A ROCKET OR A CLAY PIGEON.  THATS WHITE HOT MOLTEN STEEL WHEN IT BREAKS UP YOU CAN SEE THAT THE OUT SIDE IS WHITE HOT.. WE DONT HAVE ANYTHING THAT WOULD SKIP AS WHITE HOT MOLTEN STEEL IT WOULD HIT AND THUD LIKE A WET TURD.. I KNOW THATS NASTY BUT IF YOU EVER WORKED WILT STEAL ANY METAL YOU KNOW IT GETS SOFT THAT SKIPED HARD. SOME DAY WE HAVE TO FIND OUT WHAT THE HELL IT IS.. LMAO DRIVES YA CRAZY RIGHT

[stevenm7412]

this was shot down by usaf using three radars positioned in a huge triangle the radio waves make the ufo uncontrollable when it passes through the beam hence it crashes,that how the usaf have got so much data from the crafts,this was in Mexico in the late 60s,we can take et back home now,we have all the info we need to build these craft and have had for a long time,most ufo are reverse engineered by usaf,BUT NOT ALL. disclosure slow but sure.DO YOUR HOMEWORK AND YOU WILL FIND OUT THE TRUTH.

[AllanSanches]

I saw this ages ago, never found more info about this, where was it, who taped it ?

[THEBEASTOFOLD]

Nothing man made ( that we know of ) would have stayed together after the first bounce.

[JCmirrorlamb]

I hear ya chucky thats an excellent question one that im sure would be near immpossible to figure out but excellent comment none the less *cheers* KING

[chuck4842]

I'd like to know the history of this video. To my knowledge it stands as genuine. I feel we're seeing a part of a gone wrong test some where. I've seen projectiles from explosions and crashes that are similar. Somebody knows, dang it, where's the cameraman? BTW what's this mean? :)(: yinyang? lol jk

[JCmirrorlamb]

cool paulo good observation . I think that is a logical addition to the comments *cheers* :)(:

[paulogiella]

its full o mercury it prealesses to second impat . seond impact yes broken antigraitu sistem cause punch& touch EATRH". no mor field, no more antigraity, crash, impat destrution of metakls o disc and contibue the incandesence mercuty its spgerical tripp.

best viodeo

[JCmirrorlamb]

Could be thats why I leave the question open for debate thanx for your comment *cheers* To all others your opinions may vary . Do not be afraid to voice your thoughts on the board ..*Peace* JCmirrorLamb

[Tomen8r]

I would say artificial. The size of the object is exaggerated in the footage, but finally disclosed when flying in front of the telephone pole, which is close by. Of course, this evidence is totally inconclusive. Somebody was skeet shooting, I would say.