The argument is actually slightly deeper than that. In order for something to BE at all, it must BE observable and testable. If it's not, than it never really existed in the first place. "God" DOES exist, but only in the delusions of a believer's brain. Once science finds "God" (and it will in the next 10 or 15 years), it will be deemed a brain disorder (due to persistent brainwashing from churches). Churches will get sued, and "God" will cease to exist.
1. Assume God exists. 2. Assume God is not bound by logic. 3. "God is not bound by logic." is an assumed true logical statement regarding God. 4. From the truth of 3, God is bound by logic. 5. This is a contradiction. 6. Therefore, God is bound by logic. 7. If God is bound by logic, then Logic is strictly greater than god. 8. From 6 and 7, Logic is strictly greater than god. 9. Therefore, Logic IS (the new) God. 10. Logic is not God. 11. God does not exist. Q.E.D.
My proof is more general and disproves ALL conceptions of God. In fact, my proof makes a general statement about the nature of the universe and truth (that EVERYONE already accepts, whether they realize it or not). People that have a hard time with my proof need to lake logic 101. It's really not that complicated. Where are you hung up???
Paradoxes??? Here. Let me simplify it to one sentence for you: Anything that is beyond logic is beyond description, and thus cannot exist. PERIOD. That makes logic the greatest, because it controls everything. The problem here is not that you are confused by paradoxes, but rather, that general population has been intentionally deceived by those who don't want them to see the truth. Because, in truth there is power. Ever wonder why logic isn't taught in public schools?
Can't say I have, but I did attend a Christian school when I was a kid. I imagine there's not a whole lot of room for independent thought requiring logic.
Evolutionary scientists see creation and/or intelligent design as unscientific and not worthy of scientific examination. In order for something to be considered a “science,” they argue, it must be able to be observed and tested; it must be “naturalistic.” Creation is by definition “supernatural.” God and the supernatural cannot be observed or tested (so the argument goes); therefore, creation and/or intelligent design cannot be considered science.
@dntExj0ny Go outside at noon and look up. There is your god. Everything you know, everything you are, came from the sun. What created the sun? another sun. That explains our genesis. Natural selection explains our evolution. Cultural memes explain our morals and our conduct as a species. Science offers us wisdom and understanding and, as well, it increases our desire to seek more knowledge. The laws of physics explain the origin of the universe. There you have it.. no need for the supernatural.
@DeshAnther Evolutionary scientists see creation and/or intelligent design as unscientific and not worthy of scientific examination. In order for something to be considered a “science,” they argue, it must be able to be observed and tested; it must be “naturalistic.” Creation is by definition “supernatural.” God and the supernatural cannot be observed or tested (so the argument goes); therefore, creation and/or intelligent design cannot be considered science.
@DeshAnther Of course, neither can evolution be observed or tested, but that does not seem to be an issue with evolutionists. As a result, all data is filtered through the preconceived, presupposed, and pre-accepted theory of evolution, without alternate explanations being considered.
This is paid by the Church isn't it?
HORRORTV1 7 months ago
Not true at all, of course.
MrFogeyblue 7 months ago
@dntExj0ny
The argument is actually slightly deeper than that. In order for something to BE at all, it must BE observable and testable. If it's not, than it never really existed in the first place. "God" DOES exist, but only in the delusions of a believer's brain. Once science finds "God" (and it will in the next 10 or 15 years), it will be deemed a brain disorder (due to persistent brainwashing from churches). Churches will get sued, and "God" will cease to exist.
ThinkTank255 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. Assume God exists. 2. Assume God is not bound by logic. 3. "God is not bound by logic." is an assumed true logical statement regarding God. 4. From the truth of 3, God is bound by logic. 5. This is a contradiction. 6. Therefore, God is bound by logic. 7. If God is bound by logic, then Logic is strictly greater than god. 8. From 6 and 7, Logic is strictly greater than god. 9. Therefore, Logic IS (the new) God. 10. Logic is not God. 11. God does not exist. Q.E.D.
ThinkTank255 9 months ago
@ThinkTank255 WTF??? Try the God and Devil paradox, it's easier to understand.
SDBPR 8 months ago
@SDBPR
My proof is more general and disproves ALL conceptions of God. In fact, my proof makes a general statement about the nature of the universe and truth (that EVERYONE already accepts, whether they realize it or not). People that have a hard time with my proof need to lake logic 101. It's really not that complicated. Where are you hung up???
ThinkTank255 8 months ago
@ThinkTank255 Just the...wording. Sorry, paradoxes confuse me like how robots blow up when they hear them.
SDBPR 8 months ago
@SDBPR
Paradoxes??? Here. Let me simplify it to one sentence for you: Anything that is beyond logic is beyond description, and thus cannot exist. PERIOD. That makes logic the greatest, because it controls everything. The problem here is not that you are confused by paradoxes, but rather, that general population has been intentionally deceived by those who don't want them to see the truth. Because, in truth there is power. Ever wonder why logic isn't taught in public schools?
ThinkTank255 8 months ago
@ThinkTank255 You ever been to a Filipino Catholic School? No offense, I agree with you completely.
SDBPR 8 months ago
@SDBPR
Can't say I have, but I did attend a Christian school when I was a kid. I imagine there's not a whole lot of room for independent thought requiring logic.
ThinkTank255 8 months ago
@ThinkTank255 Excuse my language, but "amen" to that.
SDBPR 8 months ago
Evolutionary scientists see creation and/or intelligent design as unscientific and not worthy of scientific examination. In order for something to be considered a “science,” they argue, it must be able to be observed and tested; it must be “naturalistic.” Creation is by definition “supernatural.” God and the supernatural cannot be observed or tested (so the argument goes); therefore, creation and/or intelligent design cannot be considered science.
dntExj0ny 10 months ago
This video touch my heart... :)
nice share...
sangadji08 10 months ago
God does exist. Whether you believe in Him or not, He does exist. God is everything, everywhere.
For God time does not exist,
for God growing does not exist,
for God everything is His
dntExj0ny 11 months ago
@dntExj0ny you sound like a person on drugs
DeshAnther 10 months ago
@DeshAnther well talking realistically being a Christian is down right insane to those who are atheist lets say.
The world doesnt get why they do it, the world will always try to find a logical explanation to everything. I am not saying everyone is like that
dntExj0ny 10 months ago
@dntExj0ny Go outside at noon and look up. There is your god. Everything you know, everything you are, came from the sun. What created the sun? another sun. That explains our genesis. Natural selection explains our evolution. Cultural memes explain our morals and our conduct as a species. Science offers us wisdom and understanding and, as well, it increases our desire to seek more knowledge. The laws of physics explain the origin of the universe. There you have it.. no need for the supernatural.
DeshAnther 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DeshAnther Evolutionary scientists see creation and/or intelligent design as unscientific and not worthy of scientific examination. In order for something to be considered a “science,” they argue, it must be able to be observed and tested; it must be “naturalistic.” Creation is by definition “supernatural.” God and the supernatural cannot be observed or tested (so the argument goes); therefore, creation and/or intelligent design cannot be considered science.
dntExj0ny 10 months ago
@DeshAnther Of course, neither can evolution be observed or tested, but that does not seem to be an issue with evolutionists. As a result, all data is filtered through the preconceived, presupposed, and pre-accepted theory of evolution, without alternate explanations being considered.
dntExj0ny 10 months ago
great video
i like it
this child is so cool
mystteries 1 year ago
Albert Einstein has absolutely nothing to do with the story in this video.
kiteph 1 year ago
Evil is the result of what happen when man does not have mindfulness .........awarerness.....
diane308 2 years ago
Very well said!!!... Evil does not exist...
kathkhaye30 2 years ago