Added: 3 years ago
From: digitalcamerainfocom
Views: 107,216
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (78)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WHAT?!?! NO WATER BALLOON?!?!?!

  • good :)

  • I like toast with butter and chocolate cream

  • Ahh! I want the green ball :D :D

  • considering that, this is consumer friendly when it comes to price rather than $5000 for a starting "good" camera, this is fine for recreational fun

  • i want the green hairy thingy!! is so cute seeing it at the bulbs crashing scene, back there.. aaaaaaaaaaawwwwww <3

  • how much does this camera cost?

  • @rockmaster009 $969

    

  • the lighter ♥

  • too bad it's not HD

  • If I want to work with ANY camera that goes above 200fps, I'll stick with a Red One 4K or higher. Yes, it is $25,000 as opposed to this $800 camera, but then, every shot is quality 2-4K resolution @ 120-200fps respectively.

    This camera, in this mode....utterly useless with the low res.

    Sorry, but that's my honest opinion.

  • @AndrewDeLong i think people are looking at this for the price.. but yes that is an awesome camera

  • @LooneyM3

    Lol, true. The price is reasonable. I mean, I'm an HD guy myself, but yeah, the price does make sense.

  • With the 1200fps shots, does it always shoot in that letterbox frame?

  • finnaly there are some slowmotion clips that people acully WANT to see

  • Hey i was looking at the ex f1 on the internet and it just said 60fps and you say it can go up to1200fps

  • Yeah the quality is crap...

  • mhhh...looks more like 600fps...its a bit to fast for 1200fps.

    i have ex fh20, but movies in 1000fps have less quality than this.

  • 0:26 Faaiiiil :D

  • i need that camera.

  • It is as you said - a test. But more can´t this be, i´m sorry. I´m using this cam myself and i´m very happy with it, but the 1200 fps mode with its 96 pixel in heigth is just a gimmick, not more. 300 fps (512x384) or 600 fps (432x192) held the balance between speed and quality. Nevertheless there is nothing comparable around for 700€ and if you want to do 3000 fps (or more) in 720p there´s nothing under 50.000€ - not to mention Full-HD ...

    Nice vid anyway, so let´s say Thumbs up!

  • so is there any camera that can shoot in like ..600fps in high res? :( i REALLY really need one.

  • @onTh3edge yes, but very expensive. The phantom can get up to 5,000 frames in 720p, of course it can cost as much as 150,000...

  • how much time does the camera can record in 1200 fps??

  • Its good as a research tool, but quality is a bit low res at 1200fps, considering the pro grade setups for highspeed filming this is quite affordable and probably a good starting point.

  • nice video!

  • lmao! i had to watch that green thing 2 more times.

  • wtf this is actually really old but its only just started popping up in my featured bar... wtfff

  • lol at the slo mo green thing

  • Shit, i ment to pause and i pressed 1 star...

    This is great, i would of gave it 5/5 if it werent for my lame mistake

  • aside from the low res, that is awesome. can;t wait until they come out with a camera like that that can do 1200fps in hd

  • I can't wait until 2TB SD cards become available, because we'll need them to do any thing useful in highspeed HD.

  • @ubuntututorials

    why not SDHC?

  • @crydepunkmuffin Well, yeah, SDHC for high speed. SD as in the SD form factor, whether in SDXC, SDHC, or Super SD or whatever else is next. I wish I had one of these cameras. Looks really cool.

  • I like that green thing...

  • Whats the name of the song?

  • the resolution of 336 x 96 is a joke!!!

  • I shot one of those cap guns with a pellet gun and that camera in my up-coming video.

    It EXPLODED!

  • 0:42 is lol...

  • Yes... i want one now

  • COOOOL i'm think i gonna buy one

  • how much r they?

  • @firepath33 the cheapest ive seen for $899

  • Make it 12,000 FPS and a macro lens, and NOW we are talking.

  • Like watching a TV :D

  • stop crushing everything!

  • awesome

  • i think the quality of the high speed shots is to bad....

  • thats what happens unless you have a LOT of light

  • they are supposed to be. for now. 1200fps in full hd for 20 secs is about between 400-800gb

  • Okay thats way too much ^^ xD

  • @EtO124

    yep :O but consider its a 300 dollar cam, not a 30000 one :O :) and yep i would stay in about 600 fps still looks nice :D

  • @masni92 It's actually like $800.. o.-

  • @masni92

    whhmm, are we talking about the same camera :O = :D

  • @EtO124 Well considering that the EX-F1 can be had for $1000 and a HD camera of equivelant speed costs about as much as an Aston Martin, I think it's an ok deal.

  • Good for scientific use, but not for production. The resolution in high-speed mode is too limited.

  • Geiles Vid !

    Das Magnetband hat wohl endlich ausgedient :-)

    Ich wünsche mir ab diese HigSpeedaufnahme von einer Cam bei vollem Bild und wesendlich besser Schärfe.

    BR Martin*****

  • whats the name of the song

  • The Blue Danube - Johann Strauss

  • high speed recording seems like a killer feature but is a bit of a gimmik, this camera like the lg viewty i breifly owned only records very high speed at very low resolutions, video was ok, tho smashing things on the brick was a bit anticlimatic

  • at 1:40 it's like sperm U.U

  • How did you get your vids to come out so clean looking in 1200fps mode?? Everything else I've seen is really really dark and really grainy too....

    I'm guessing there's a lot of post production on this video, and this isn't raw footage straight from the camera.

  • Staphinfection, there is no post production on the video; it is imported, edited together and the uploaded, but we didn't tweak the video.

    The secret is light; to get decent results in the fastest mode, you have to have lots and lots of light as the shutter speed is really short

  • I dunno why, but :56 makes me smile. lol

  • ok ,thanks

  • um, are you sure some of these clips are at 1200 fps?

    some of them look alot faster than 1200fps should be

  • lol at the green face xDD

  • at like 1:50 the ball looks like those things in the water ..

  • i am so want that camera .....

  • Neat video clips! At 1200 fps, even the colors look quite good. The Casio F1 looks like it does a great job in high speed / slow motion mode, although its resolution @ 1200 fps is very limited to a tiny 96 pixels vertically. The only slight criticism I have is to adjust the focus to make the pictures sharper, like how the one at 1:24 (the lighter) is nice and sharp / focused. Thanks for the video clips!

  • hey dude - nice clips, but a little blurred. set the ring options for the ring on the lens on "focus" and then you can focus the shot :)

  • dude this is fucking awesome.

    What kind of tripod would you recomend for this camera?

    and im gonna subscribe.

    :)

  • cool but but twice the height would be nice.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more