u must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be saved
If I want to work with ANY camera that goes above 200fps, I'll stick with a Red One 4K or higher. Yes, it is $25,000 as opposed to this $800 camera, but then, every shot is quality 2-4K resolution @ 120-200fps respectively.
This camera, in this mode....utterly useless with the low res.
It is as you said - a test. But more can´t this be, i´m sorry. I´m using this cam myself and i´m very happy with it, but the 1200 fps mode with its 96 pixel in heigth is just a gimmick, not more. 300 fps (512x384) or 600 fps (432x192) held the balance between speed and quality. Nevertheless there is nothing comparable around for 700€ and if you want to do 3000 fps (or more) in 720p there´s nothing under 50.000€ - not to mention Full-HD ...
Its good as a research tool, but quality is a bit low res at 1200fps, considering the pro grade setups for highspeed filming this is quite affordable and probably a good starting point.
@crydepunkmuffin Well, yeah, SDHC for high speed. SD as in the SD form factor, whether in SDXC, SDHC, or Super SD or whatever else is next. I wish I had one of these cameras. Looks really cool.
@EtO124 Well considering that the EX-F1 can be had for $1000 and a HD camera of equivelant speed costs about as much as an Aston Martin, I think it's an ok deal.
high speed recording seems like a killer feature but is a bit of a gimmik, this camera like the lg viewty i breifly owned only records very high speed at very low resolutions, video was ok, tho smashing things on the brick was a bit anticlimatic
Neat video clips! At 1200 fps, even the colors look quite good. The Casio F1 looks like it does a great job in high speed / slow motion mode, although its resolution @ 1200 fps is very limited to a tiny 96 pixels vertically. The only slight criticism I have is to adjust the focus to make the pictures sharper, like how the one at 1:24 (the lighter) is nice and sharp / focused. Thanks for the video clips!
WHAT?!?! NO WATER BALLOON?!?!?!
boxman1571 1 month ago
good :)
EXTERMINADORJAVIER 2 months ago
I like toast with butter and chocolate cream
BxMxW97 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
u must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be saved
seltrix19 7 months ago
Ahh! I want the green ball :D :D
Xethrocc 9 months ago
considering that, this is consumer friendly when it comes to price rather than $5000 for a starting "good" camera, this is fine for recreational fun
cardshark722 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
will you stop breaking things
10floos 11 months ago
i want the green hairy thingy!! is so cute seeing it at the bulbs crashing scene, back there.. aaaaaaaaaaawwwwww <3
Aglaonik 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1) Hold your breath.
2) Copy all of these steps.
3) Go to two other video.
4) Paste it in the comments.
If you can do all of this without breathing you're a good pot smoker
kawiw 1 year ago
how much does this camera cost?
rockmaster009 1 year ago
@rockmaster009 $969
jakedotnorthrup 11 months ago
the lighter ♥
187Guitarplayer 1 year ago
too bad it's not HD
Fibr3Optix 1 year ago
If I want to work with ANY camera that goes above 200fps, I'll stick with a Red One 4K or higher. Yes, it is $25,000 as opposed to this $800 camera, but then, every shot is quality 2-4K resolution @ 120-200fps respectively.
This camera, in this mode....utterly useless with the low res.
Sorry, but that's my honest opinion.
AndrewDeLong 1 year ago
@AndrewDeLong i think people are looking at this for the price.. but yes that is an awesome camera
LooneyM3 1 year ago
@LooneyM3
Lol, true. The price is reasonable. I mean, I'm an HD guy myself, but yeah, the price does make sense.
AndrewDeLong 1 year ago
With the 1200fps shots, does it always shoot in that letterbox frame?
willplez 1 year ago
finnaly there are some slowmotion clips that people acully WANT to see
fritz123sk8er 1 year ago
Hey i was looking at the ex f1 on the internet and it just said 60fps and you say it can go up to1200fps
UKairsoft94 1 year ago
Yeah the quality is crap...
MurdocLC 1 year ago
mhhh...looks more like 600fps...its a bit to fast for 1200fps.
i have ex fh20, but movies in 1000fps have less quality than this.
zipfiklatscha87 1 year ago
0:26 Faaiiiil :D
TimoPlusA 1 year ago 4
i need that camera.
NeveGialla161 1 year ago
It is as you said - a test. But more can´t this be, i´m sorry. I´m using this cam myself and i´m very happy with it, but the 1200 fps mode with its 96 pixel in heigth is just a gimmick, not more. 300 fps (512x384) or 600 fps (432x192) held the balance between speed and quality. Nevertheless there is nothing comparable around for 700€ and if you want to do 3000 fps (or more) in 720p there´s nothing under 50.000€ - not to mention Full-HD ...
Nice vid anyway, so let´s say Thumbs up!
QueenOfUnimatrixZero 1 year ago
so is there any camera that can shoot in like ..600fps in high res? :( i REALLY really need one.
onTh3edge 1 year ago
@onTh3edge yes, but very expensive. The phantom can get up to 5,000 frames in 720p, of course it can cost as much as 150,000...
dertuman 1 year ago
how much time does the camera can record in 1200 fps??
thejoseandresshow 1 year ago
Its good as a research tool, but quality is a bit low res at 1200fps, considering the pro grade setups for highspeed filming this is quite affordable and probably a good starting point.
hairyshitter 1 year ago
nice video!
bloodaid 1 year ago
lmao! i had to watch that green thing 2 more times.
pattasy 1 year ago 7
wtf this is actually really old but its only just started popping up in my featured bar... wtfff
loccy555 1 year ago
lol at the slo mo green thing
abhiginimav 1 year ago
Shit, i ment to pause and i pressed 1 star...
This is great, i would of gave it 5/5 if it werent for my lame mistake
RampagedWillis 1 year ago
aside from the low res, that is awesome. can;t wait until they come out with a camera like that that can do 1200fps in hd
shircle 1 year ago
I can't wait until 2TB SD cards become available, because we'll need them to do any thing useful in highspeed HD.
ubuntututorials 1 year ago
@ubuntututorials
why not SDHC?
crydepunkmuffin 1 year ago
@crydepunkmuffin Well, yeah, SDHC for high speed. SD as in the SD form factor, whether in SDXC, SDHC, or Super SD or whatever else is next. I wish I had one of these cameras. Looks really cool.
ubuntututorials 1 year ago
I like that green thing...
lordoid 2 years ago
Whats the name of the song?
DetEJagDe 2 years ago
the resolution of 336 x 96 is a joke!!!
dicks0n 2 years ago
I shot one of those cap guns with a pellet gun and that camera in my up-coming video.
It EXPLODED!
lockheed22 2 years ago
0:42 is lol...
arroy624 2 years ago 2
Yes... i want one now
spoblin 2 years ago
COOOOL i'm think i gonna buy one
DetEJagDe 2 years ago 2
how much r they?
firepath33 2 years ago
@firepath33 the cheapest ive seen for $899
thaik90 2 years ago
Make it 12,000 FPS and a macro lens, and NOW we are talking.
shadowblack1987 2 years ago 54
Like watching a TV :D
Inku7 2 years ago
stop crushing everything!
airdog77 2 years ago 3
awesome
DualAnalogReviews 2 years ago
i think the quality of the high speed shots is to bad....
EtO124 2 years ago 30
thats what happens unless you have a LOT of light
SAFENAFE1985 2 years ago
they are supposed to be. for now. 1200fps in full hd for 20 secs is about between 400-800gb
chaz129 2 years ago
Okay thats way too much ^^ xD
EtO124 2 years ago
@EtO124
yep :O but consider its a 300 dollar cam, not a 30000 one :O :) and yep i would stay in about 600 fps still looks nice :D
masni92 1 year ago
@masni92 It's actually like $800.. o.-
rideshorse05 1 year ago
@masni92
whhmm, are we talking about the same camera :O = :D
masni92 1 year ago
@EtO124 Well considering that the EX-F1 can be had for $1000 and a HD camera of equivelant speed costs about as much as an Aston Martin, I think it's an ok deal.
uzaiyaro 5 months ago
Good for scientific use, but not for production. The resolution in high-speed mode is too limited.
douro20 2 years ago
Geiles Vid !
Das Magnetband hat wohl endlich ausgedient :-)
Ich wünsche mir ab diese HigSpeedaufnahme von einer Cam bei vollem Bild und wesendlich besser Schärfe.
BR Martin*****
MalNichtEgal 2 years ago
whats the name of the song
Lakel39 2 years ago
The Blue Danube - Johann Strauss
mpwelk 2 years ago
high speed recording seems like a killer feature but is a bit of a gimmik, this camera like the lg viewty i breifly owned only records very high speed at very low resolutions, video was ok, tho smashing things on the brick was a bit anticlimatic
flightlessgull 2 years ago 2
at 1:40 it's like sperm U.U
mutiax 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cover your mouth with your hand
2. Make a wish
3.Close your hand (fist)
4. Hold your hand at heart for 5 seconds
5. Send this to 3 more videos
6. Tommorrow will be the best day ever
it actually worked
Money- you will find a wad of $200 in cash
Love- Your crush or lover will kiss you or ask you out please do this my wish is important
LanceWillDance 2 years ago
How did you get your vids to come out so clean looking in 1200fps mode?? Everything else I've seen is really really dark and really grainy too....
I'm guessing there's a lot of post production on this video, and this isn't raw footage straight from the camera.
staphinfection 2 years ago 3
Staphinfection, there is no post production on the video; it is imported, edited together and the uploaded, but we didn't tweak the video.
The secret is light; to get decent results in the fastest mode, you have to have lots and lots of light as the shutter speed is really short
baggers 2 years ago
I dunno why, but :56 makes me smile. lol
activesack 2 years ago
ok ,thanks
insanitystudio 2 years ago
um, are you sure some of these clips are at 1200 fps?
some of them look alot faster than 1200fps should be
insanitystudio 2 years ago
lol at the green face xDD
toocoolforu 2 years ago 3
at like 1:50 the ball looks like those things in the water ..
DesertEagleQc 3 years ago
i am so want that camera .....
mikiarlo3 3 years ago
Neat video clips! At 1200 fps, even the colors look quite good. The Casio F1 looks like it does a great job in high speed / slow motion mode, although its resolution @ 1200 fps is very limited to a tiny 96 pixels vertically. The only slight criticism I have is to adjust the focus to make the pictures sharper, like how the one at 1:24 (the lighter) is nice and sharp / focused. Thanks for the video clips!
video2983 3 years ago
hey dude - nice clips, but a little blurred. set the ring options for the ring on the lens on "focus" and then you can focus the shot :)
magleman 3 years ago
dude this is fucking awesome.
What kind of tripod would you recomend for this camera?
and im gonna subscribe.
:)
maxxisalittlebitch 3 years ago
cool but but twice the height would be nice.
timtak1 3 years ago