Chemistry. A Volatile History Episode 2 Part 5/5

[steve12345678957]

What you have written is something to do with chemical reactivity merged with.....well i'm not sure. It would better to ask a physicist, not a chemist...or read a book or something....saying that the comment from CH3MIS7RY seems like a good place to start.....

[Bitchesonmyjoc7k]

great video thanx. using it for my science project

[hitmonlee00]

why is 92 elements all that it could be? i still don't understand...

[EMC2Documentaries]

@hitmonlee00 I believe the larger the radius of an atom becomes, the less stable it can be, the force within the atom cannot hold electrons revolving in large radius, hence it becomes unstable. That's why artificial elements beyond Uranium (e.g Einsteinium, Mendelevium, Lawrencium) hardly exist for a second

[steve12345678957]

this is completely wrong, the stability of an element has nothing to do with its electrons.....

[EMC2Documentaries]

@steve12345678957 Well, I would like to hear your correction. I was never certain about my information concerning that..

[CH3MIS7RY]

@EMC2Documentaries check out a graph of binding energy per nucleon...that's a better visual explanation for the elements with Z > 92 having no stable isotopes.

[Effectedpenguin]

lol



[iAlwaysKnowIt]

Amazing video!!