In my opinion these two guys at the main table are acting like stage actors, playing to eachother. I dont sence any real honesty or depth in anything that comes out of their mouths. The third guy seemed interesting enough but by the time it got to him i found a Slavoj Zizek video (Continental Philosopher) to watch, who I find has great depth and I enjoy listening to him very much. If you like philosophy. Check him out.
Well done. Sure, there is a place for philosophy in the world and I hope that we dont forget where this title "Philosophy" comes from...love of wisdom.... therefore we should expect from those guys to share more then just only information and knowledge - but skillfully linked it with experience and then spread the wisdom ... truths - for the benefit of all, thanks and Good luck
This radio show style seems awkward - why do thay do that? It really gets boring because useful information is so loosely packed. And that fast-talking guy was weird - how is anyone supposed to really understand what he's saying?
it would, in theory, decrease the excellence of the academic institute because the teaching would be less individualized. That and the dorms would be crowded.
With existing staff and facilities it would obviously dilute the various courses. However if a programme of building educational facilities was carried out with proper funding and care, then there is no reason why such centres of excellence may not multiply and become the backbone of a sane society, as is the case in other countries in Europe, which are not as awfully educated as the USA. islands of excellence in a sea of ignorance is a recipe for disaster, failure and stagnation.
That's rather interesting. The main issue is whether any institutions/university is capable of maintaining such "proper funding and care". But it should be something worth considering (maybe something like Berkeley?)
Well, I (personally) don't mind the fact that Stanford accepts a limited number of students. However, I would like to see Stanford post more of their lectures online such as MIT OCW. I believe Stanford to have some courses online, but not sufficient. (I like to self-study ^.^)
This has been flagged as spam show
University was created to educate people.
grunder20 1 month ago
great vid!
potpie921 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is the answer that ive been waiting for.
grunder20 2 months ago
In my opinion these two guys at the main table are acting like stage actors, playing to eachother. I dont sence any real honesty or depth in anything that comes out of their mouths. The third guy seemed interesting enough but by the time it got to him i found a Slavoj Zizek video (Continental Philosopher) to watch, who I find has great depth and I enjoy listening to him very much. If you like philosophy. Check him out.
sonic9rg 6 months ago
@sonic9rg senSe
vasco1983 2 months ago
Comment removed
sonic9rg 6 months ago
From an undergrad: thank you.
tramsay1027 1 year ago
Philosophy Talk is a great show. Couldn't listen to this week's show and found it on YouTube. Excellent debate.
Dino2266 1 year ago
Well done. Sure, there is a place for philosophy in the world and I hope that we dont forget where this title "Philosophy" comes from...love of wisdom.... therefore we should expect from those guys to share more then just only information and knowledge - but skillfully linked it with experience and then spread the wisdom ... truths - for the benefit of all, thanks and Good luck
paveldit 2 years ago
wow i didnt know about this it is very interesting you see this is one of the reasons why i like you tube its such a great learning tool.
Chick6517 2 years ago 5
long live philosophy talk! best radio program ever.
snowpants73 2 years ago
This radio show style seems awkward - why do thay do that? It really gets boring because useful information is so loosely packed. And that fast-talking guy was weird - how is anyone supposed to really understand what he's saying?
noobyfromhell 2 years ago
Yeah it seems scripted, also a lot of it is just pretentious backpatting.
marcus3379 2 years ago
@marcus3379 True
nknejad 1 year ago
Interesting topic, especially when about 20 of my friends just got rejected/deferred from Stanford.
hunterbender 2 years ago 8
if everyone who applied to stanford got in, the campus would have to expand like 10 times over.
blackberryjuice1 2 years ago
and that would be a bad thing?
marsCubed 2 years ago
it would, in theory, decrease the excellence of the academic institute because the teaching would be less individualized. That and the dorms would be crowded.
numbers3934 2 years ago
With existing staff and facilities it would obviously dilute the various courses. However if a programme of building educational facilities was carried out with proper funding and care, then there is no reason why such centres of excellence may not multiply and become the backbone of a sane society, as is the case in other countries in Europe, which are not as awfully educated as the USA. islands of excellence in a sea of ignorance is a recipe for disaster, failure and stagnation.
marsCubed 2 years ago 2
That's rather interesting. The main issue is whether any institutions/university is capable of maintaining such "proper funding and care". But it should be something worth considering (maybe something like Berkeley?)
Well, I (personally) don't mind the fact that Stanford accepts a limited number of students. However, I would like to see Stanford post more of their lectures online such as MIT OCW. I believe Stanford to have some courses online, but not sufficient. (I like to self-study ^.^)
hunterbender 2 years ago
lol STANFORD PRIDE LOL
greatestiron 2 years ago
bad topic
Maxell720 2 years ago
Interesting conversation . It really gives a deeper idea of what's the purpose of a university
Cremolero 2 years ago 2
nice job
rogermarquee 2 years ago