IE9 for Windows Phone 7 support HTML5 and speed test with iPhone.

[666phobophile]

I respect WP7 and iOS. Say no to Android!

[Iyoulikeyoutoo]

It's a shame that the rest of the OS sucks so much.

[chronofusion]

chrome has html5 hardware acceleration support also. same amount same tech level etc. and is ALWAYS ahead of chrome and usually neck and neck with firefox. chrome ftw. I only use ie9 if there is an online pdf that chrome refuses to open for whatever wacko reason or to fill out a job application if the vendors website decides to block both firefox and chrome browsers. safari's extension library is 1 ant compared to the massive worldwide colony that chrome store has. ie9's plugins? LOL. fail

[xkrnbanditx]

@chronofusion yo.... chrome and firefox isnt available on droid, w7 phone, or ipod/iphones. YOU sir... fail

[chronofusion]

@xkrnbanditx you're apparently one of those windows ONLY users in the world that is also STUCK on NEVER learning shit about his/her own o.s. and never willing to get your neurons dirty. ya dont have a clue. YOU FAIL.dumbass. ( ftr i own and use ubuntu 11.04, Mint 11 x64, Win 7 pr 64, Mac osx Lion) just because thecompany that makes a product says the product won't work on something..doesn't mean it's true. There's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.

[xkrnbanditx]

@chronofusion never learning anything about my os...? Well thats kinda cause i don't have a w7 droid or an iphone. and why... WHY are you bringing computer operating systems into this discussion. We are discussing smartphones. i really dont give a crap what your computers can run. Yes i too have common sense, i do understand that sometimes there are things better in other products, there are better things in apple and better things in pc. What are we arguing about...?

[chronofusion]

@xkrnbanditx just because a phone company or software company or BOTH that normally collaborate with each other didn't make a w7 driod phone or a windows compatible or dual booting o.s. iPhone DOESN'T mean it can't be done. and you're the one that brought operating systems into your loosing end of this argument , " w 7 phone" w 7 aka windows 7 which IS an operating system. you're welcome. move on kid. ya lost. get over it. no more continues. conversation is over.

[amigomao]

CREO QUE LOS HTC SON MEJORES QUE LOS IPHONE

[TASKMASTER419]

the nokia n9 does this right out the box and also is 100 percent linux and does everything my old nokia 900 does and more meego ftw wp7 wait for yo updates but wp7 still is not as powefull as the nokia n9

[Esebi95]

I would still rather use Safari rather than IE9

[AndrewBouchierUK]

@Esebi95 i would use Firefox the  both but out of the two IE9 is better

[GlobalAuctioNZ]

It would have been much better to know the display resolution & FPS. With the HTML 5 FishIE Tank app they provide at default (20 fish) I'm getting 23 FPS on iOS5 beta 2 "with a retina display"... The real user experience of browsing on a mobile is IE is the worst. Check out the video "HTML5 Mobile Speed Test" on the right. View the comments. 6 years Microsoft have been trying to get a decent mobile web browser & it still sucks. (I was an avid WM user, check out Deep Fish from 6 years ago!)

[XBOXNationTVHD]

Damn my phone kick all of yalls phone butts!

[rezashamsi23]

Just ie

[hoangclub03]

Wow, IE9 for Windows Phone 7 No.1 :).

[Gagangarry1]

And some say web browsing is good on iPhone.. lame fanboys

[AnderdroidApps]

@ksskssful I figured you had me confused with the other guy. Although I was basing 20% of the credibility of the test off of that 20% chance, lol. My point was that they simply designed the test for IE9 as well. Either way, whatever. Good day. Lmao

[AnderdroidApps]

@ksskssful and why exactly are your panties in such a bunch?

[ksskssful]

@AnderdroidApps Lol the "MUST" was sarcasm. My point was that your taking the 20% chance that it was fake and basing the entire credibility of this test off of that 20% So I did read thank you very much, and did i say that they used those browsers for the programming of the main test? No, so I suggest that YOU learn to read. Anyways, this argument is pointless, and lets put this aside. And truthfully I had you mixed up with the other person :D so thats why my panties were in a bunch.

[AnderdroidApps]

@ksskssful what exactly did I say that you disagreed with? Lmfao. Read, then think before you hit the post button please.

[AnderdroidApps]

@ksskssful learn to read, dumb fuck. I said 20% chance, that's a "might" not a "must". Too blind of a fanboy to realize that oh wait, I love WP7. Who cares if the test is slightly biased, which you even agreed to. What eactly did I

[Johonywuzhere]

WP7 browser is much faster than safari.

[oOoAlanWaKEoOo]

i fool 4 sucks

WP7 alot better

[sk8rked]

@oOoAlanWaKEoOo How so? This test was optimized for just WP7 phones which is unfair.

[ksskssful]

@sk8rked Oh my gosh it's people like you that are so annoying. There is the proof right in front of you, and you make up some crap story to defend your Jesus phone. Fanboyism defys logic.

[sk8rked]

@ksskssful I'm not defending shit you fucktard. Just saying this was a biased test, optimized for IE9 on WP7.

[ksskssful]

@sk8rked And where did you get that? Prove it and I will believe you.

[AnderdroidApps]

@ksskssful Microsoft designing the benchmark for IE9 doesn't prove it enough? Really? What? You think they used Android or Firefox as their main test when they programmed it? FAIL.

[ksskssful]

@AnderdroidApps God, prove it you dumb fuck like I said and I'll believe it. It MUST be a scam in their favor, its just NOT POSSIBLE that they would do a fair test.... it's just the only thing that can be done, a biased test.

[AnderdroidApps]

@ksskssful Sorry, open source the benchmark so everyone can do it and then it's proof.

Either way, I don't doubt it.

But oh my gosh, it's people like you that are so annoying. Believing everything some man at a conference for his company says about comparing to the competitors.

The world is evil, therefore there's a 20% chance that this test was completely faked.

As I said above, I doubt it. IE9 is impressive.

[mxrss1]

@appleistheshit the test is open source, you can download the Javascript files, the plain simple fact is that other browsers have not implemented hardware acceleration.

[milomice]

Awesome,awesome..awesomw!!!

[DannysonofGod]

NO NO NO!!!, apple isthe best enterprise in the world, every company compares to apple to say that the are "better" enterprise, and WTF INTERNET EXPLORER 9 is better than safari, i think ie9 is better displaying those fishes swimming than safari but are they smokiing?, almost opera is better than safari but IE9 i think they pay to this asian guy to say crap in public, plz reconsider what is talkin people now in they, and this asian guy is an example of we don't have to talk in public, fck yu ie9

[mxrss1]

@DannysonofGod What the heck are you talking about apple has almost a non-existent marketshare in the enterprise market. Also if you like FreeBSD why wouldnt you just RUN FreeBSD or linux for that matter.

[index1151]

hahahahahaha, the ie9 on wp7 KILLS the iphone safari :D. well, another proof that the iphone's safari is crap :).

and btw for all of the android fans: if android would have hardware acceleration, then it would be a good OS. but it hasn't, so it's laggy as s*it on every corner of the OS.

Peace.

[HitfulVids]

@index1151 Considering the IE9 update won't reach phones until sometime in 2054, it will still be inferior to every other browser.

[mxrss1]

@HitfulVids release for the update will be summer 2011, IE9 will be released with Mango.

[vmistry94]

@appleistheshit The demo's developed to be resource intensive, not to run better on IE9. IE9 was built to run better with the demo. So yeah you're right, it won't run better on Safari because Apple hasn't added hardware acceleration yet.

[EgoJoel]

@appleistheshit Thing is the Safari doesnt take use of the Gpu. So it has nothing to do with the program. Are you trolling?

[BrEnNo1023]

@EgoJoel well, his name IS 'apple is the shit' so...yeah...

of course he's going to turn this video around and say that microsoft is exploiting a weakness of apple's...(which they are, teheh) if he knew anything about phones or technology in general, he wouldn't be an apple fanboy.

[chinoto1]

@BrEnNo1023 Someone that "knew anything about phones or technology" would pick the phone that is most secure. Phone OS's such as Windows, iOS, and Android are made in such a way that they can't be infected by malware automatically, the user has to actually install it. iPhone can only be infected if it is jailbroken or Apple doesn't catch the malware through reviewing. Android is very resistant to viruses and is developed by the entire world. (continued)

[chinoto1]

@chinoto1 Windows... sucks. A virus that calls international numbers was deemed unavoidable by Microsoft because the OS is already secure, who then said that the only issue was user awareness (or something to that effect). Sure, users should be more cautious, but that doesn't excuse having security comparable to swiss cheese.

[kahuna3901]

@chinoto1 windows 7 is a semi closed operating system. its not modifiable like android but anyone can make an applications for windows 7 which includes someone who wants to make a virus because you can download from anywhere. windows phone 7 on the other hand is closed. you can't modify it and you have to join the wp7 developers community to developer for it. therefore without Microsofts consent you cant put an application in the market, therefore wp7 is as secure as ios.

[chinoto1]

@kahuna3901 Desktop OSs have nothing to do with the discussion. I didn't realise that Windows Phone 7 couldn't install apps from the web like Windows Mobile could. Even with that, I'm fairly certain that if a virus did bypass their reviewing, iOS would fare better than Windows because it has a better foundation (FreeBSD), assuming Apple didn't screw it up. I prefer Android because you get the inherent security of Linux (iOS might be good too), freedom, and a reasonable price. 500chr sucks!!!!!!!

[kahuna3901]

@chinoto1 because the desktop os is the unsafe os made by microsoft. this operating system is closed, a virus would have to go through the store. im actually an android user and i agree that i like freedom, i like integration with consoles and dekstop os's more than some of the freedoms given to us as users. for example i hate android skins if they dont add to the experience. my order of purchase is android, wp7, blackberry, webos then ios unfortunately for apple

[mxrss1]

@chinoto1 Wait didnt google already catch some malware in teh wild,

[chinoto1]

@mxrss1 Yep, called Droid Dream and heres why it doesn't really matter: you had to actively install the malware like any other app, the security hole it exploited was fixed in 2.3, Google sent a signal to all phones to delete apps known to harbor it, and removed them from the market. Here's an article about it: (androidpolice . com/2011/03/02/update-on-the-m­alware-monster-droiddream-is-a­n-android-nightmare-and-weve-g­ot-more-details/)

[mxrss1]

@chinoto1 But wouldnt the same response come from microsoft or apple if it were to happen to them, all platforms have the ability to remove apps, so isnt this a moot point about a virus?

[chinoto1]

@mxrss1 I wasn't really thinking there, my argument put simply was supposed to be that Android and iOS should have better inherent security than WP7 based on their heritage, so if they only had their inherent security to rely on (eg no app review), WP7 would be the most damaged by viruses.

What would be great for Android is a FOSS section that works similar to the PPAs on launchpad (.) net, put the source code out for everyone to see/review and have the server build binaries.

[mxrss1]

@chinoto1 Ok i guess i can sort of agree on that point, but i still dont think the phone would have much of an attack vector considering MS has limited what you have access to., and the only way to get a phone app to work is to write it in a managed langauge which means MS is probably not giving it full trust over the OS.

[chinoto1]

@mxrss1 Exactly, it secures itself by limiting what you can do with it, instead of finding a real way to secure itself. I have never used WP7 or an iPhone, so I wouldn't know how limited each one is in comparison to Android (which seems to let me do everything I would want it to and a bit more). Even if I did know everything about each phone OS, what I say would probably be biased towards Android since I prefer GNU/Linux on my laptop and like the FOSS philosophy.

[mxrss1]

@kahuna3901 Except they are limited to what they can touch, all apps only have storage in isolated storage meaning getting DATA from other applications is almost impossible, also right now all applications written in Managed Code, I think MS is going to announce that only Partners that are Trusted will get Native App privs. So lets say that someone wrote an virus, what would it use, if it can only see the app storage the virus creates that would be pretty useless.

[ZDevelopers]

put it against Android big guy!

[xXSCARFACE1983Xx]

@ZDevelopers

Android actually has the laggiest browser of all 3....

[PAPERCLlPS]

@ZDevelopers Dude, that would've been embarrassing. Android = Lack of GPU acceleration everywhere.

[PhongHoangIS]

Impressive speed!

This is the reason why ILINX Content Store runs so fast, even on XP machines, because it is hardware accelerated.

[Winterfang]

Damn Iphone looking clunky but Iph5 will be great.

[shinakudot]

The Safari browser on iPhone does use hardware accel... maybe not for HTML5, but for a lot of commonly used Javascript. 

[BloodyAnimator]

@shinakudot But not much of it. Thats what the video is showing. It shows little to nothing compared to Internet Explorer 9