So happy to see CapnnOrdinary and his sock account Cappnlrdenory have both been suspended. Great to see his hatred and bile (which he poses as Christian love) has finally been dumped off Youtube. About time his nasty homophobic thoughts were silenced.
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." Ghandi
What about the sociopathic serial killer? Or sex addict, pedophile, etc... ?
Perhaps being gay is the same as that (although we all agree not on the same level). Why these suck, is the ACTION is wrong, and if the cause is neurologically ingrained, then the PERSON is wrong.
What sucks in particular for gays, is the result is not to openly love :(
For the serial killer its never to taste blood again :) harsh, I know.
4. i have known people that have prayed to have their sexual and marital urges lowered because they heard that they weren't meant to be married, and as a result, they didn't yearn to be with someone any more. so i would encourage those that are gay in nature to ask God to take away urges for a partner.
5. remember, "sin" is natural to us, but it was not intended. our lust is a result of man's decision to choose against God. God did not make "you" gay, sin did.
2. Depending on which definition you choose, lust can simply mean "desire," but if you want to replace every instance of the word "lust" in my response with "sexual attraction," you can do so without changing my intended message. As a married man, I can say my "lust" for my wife pre-marriage is indistinguishable from my "sexual attraction" for her now. It is really just a matter of semantics.
1. no problem... i let everyone post responses... i don't know how to set it up so they don't need my permission.
2. no, lust is when you have a selfish sexual experience outside the boundaries of marriage. so when and if i get married, i will never be able to lust after my wife. sexual attraction in a marriage is not lust.
Remember posting this on my account? "if you were that upset you wouldn't have responded, liar. you are a deceiver and you are the "phony" one. next time you try to debate people on your world view try to have the courage to not distort people out of desperation. good bye liar.... also, get rid of your myspace account, it makes it too easy to connect your other sock accounts........ have a blast deleting this message coward!" This was posted from your sock account Capnnlrdenory!!!
You also blocked me from commenting further on both your videos "Homosexuality & Christians", "Then Why Did God Make Me Gay?" and also "A Challenge To Christians". So to claim you let everyone post is a big fat lie; something you are very good at. "A Challenge To Christians" seems to be the one that pushed you over the edge as I exposed your lies over and over again. There you make claims that you break over and over again - like not to block, never to lie etc. The break them all.
So CapnnOrdinary, you also talk about never owning a sock account. Now what BS is this??? Capnnlrdenory!!!
What is so hilarious is that not only are you unable to follow the simplest of your own rules but you dare to tell others how they should live their lives. That is sad in anyone's book. There is nothing Christian in any of your patronising hypocrisy and lies. Shame on you for all your bull. True Christians laugh at how you use hatred yet pose it as 'love'. CapnnOrdinary? Capnnlrdenory!
3. This does not really speak to my point. You had said in your original video that you thought the unwed heterosexual dilemma was worse than the homosexual Christian dilemma, and I was contesting that idea, arguing that, ultimate consequences aside, the homosexual Christian's journey through life is made more difficult than the heterosexual's but virtue of his (or her) sexual preference and societal prejudices.
3. you're right, i didn't address your concern..... i really do believe it is worse to live life all the way thru yearning for a mate and never have it happen when it was "allowed" to happen, then to live your life knowing that your yearning is never allowed to happen. it makes it easier to concede our fate.
4. Attempting to reach a state of mind wherein an individual rejects a specific partner is a far cry different than attempting to shut down his or her appetites completely. Besides, once again, this suggestion means the homosexual Christian needs to put forth that much more effort than the heterosexual Christian, which was my point. Additionally, I have to ask, what if God chooses not to take away the homosexual urges?
5. That's a conversation for another day, I think.
4. good question.... Paul talks about his "thorn" that he had to bear thru out his life... we don't know what that "thorn" was that he was pertaining to, but it shows us that we all have "thorns" that we have to persevere thru.... while i'm not gay, i have other "thorns" that hurt a lot too.... if God doesn't remove my "thorn", then i must persevere..... my reward is in Heaven, as is a gay person's.
@CapnnOrdinary As well as that, the scientific approach to homosexuality is going down a more biological genetic approach.
Neuroscientists have noticed that the brains of homosexual males are more like heterosexual females. And that homosexual females brains are more like heterosexual male brains.
Furthermore, scientists have also discovered that when a woman is pregnant with a male baby, her body perceives the baby as a foreign object, and antibodies are released to feminise the fetus.
@040wATTcLUb (cont) With each successive time that a woman produces a male baby, the more adept her body becomes at feminsing a fetus - leading to the baby becoming gay.
I am new to studying science and neuroscience, and am looking more into it, so I am sure that there is a hell of a lot more research to indicate whether or not homosexuality is biological or not.
1. nice vid, 4 stars... and thanks for being respectful.
2. "lust" is not the same as "sexual attraction". there is no such thing as a husband lusting after his wife.
3. we wont miss pizza in Heaven... and we wont miss sex.... a Christian who is a homosexual or a pedophile and doesn't act out their disposition, doesn't mean they are without the most important Hope there is. and that Hope is in Christ and salvation. we wont miss pizza in Heaven.
So happy to see CapnnOrdinary and his sock account Cappnlrdenory have both been suspended. Great to see his hatred and bile (which he poses as Christian love) has finally been dumped off Youtube. About time his nasty homophobic thoughts were silenced.
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." Ghandi
djbethell 1 year ago
Oh yeah.
1. I have managed to tamed the beast. Still a virgin at 32. And I'm not asexual :-o
2. I pray God will change my neural pathways.
3. "Go forth and multiply" doesn't exactly work for gays.
4. I don't want to change because of the world view.. its between me and God.. like a serial killer that wants to change.
MasterDemon25 1 year ago
What about the sociopathic serial killer? Or sex addict, pedophile, etc... ?
Perhaps being gay is the same as that (although we all agree not on the same level). Why these suck, is the ACTION is wrong, and if the cause is neurologically ingrained, then the PERSON is wrong.
What sucks in particular for gays, is the result is not to openly love :(
For the serial killer its never to taste blood again :) harsh, I know.
MasterDemon25 1 year ago
4. i have known people that have prayed to have their sexual and marital urges lowered because they heard that they weren't meant to be married, and as a result, they didn't yearn to be with someone any more. so i would encourage those that are gay in nature to ask God to take away urges for a partner.
5. remember, "sin" is natural to us, but it was not intended. our lust is a result of man's decision to choose against God. God did not make "you" gay, sin did.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
1. Thank you for accepting my response.
2. Depending on which definition you choose, lust can simply mean "desire," but if you want to replace every instance of the word "lust" in my response with "sexual attraction," you can do so without changing my intended message. As a married man, I can say my "lust" for my wife pre-marriage is indistinguishable from my "sexual attraction" for her now. It is really just a matter of semantics.
WannabeTesla 2 years ago
1. no problem... i let everyone post responses... i don't know how to set it up so they don't need my permission.
2. no, lust is when you have a selfish sexual experience outside the boundaries of marriage. so when and if i get married, i will never be able to lust after my wife. sexual attraction in a marriage is not lust.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
You let everyone post? That's a lie. You block people who disagree with you and make insults.
travelogue200 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Remember posting this on my account? "if you were that upset you wouldn't have responded, liar. you are a deceiver and you are the "phony" one. next time you try to debate people on your world view try to have the courage to not distort people out of desperation. good bye liar.... also, get rid of your myspace account, it makes it too easy to connect your other sock accounts........ have a blast deleting this message coward!" This was posted from your sock account Capnnlrdenory!!!
travelogue200 1 year ago
You also blocked me from commenting further on both your videos "Homosexuality & Christians", "Then Why Did God Make Me Gay?" and also "A Challenge To Christians". So to claim you let everyone post is a big fat lie; something you are very good at. "A Challenge To Christians" seems to be the one that pushed you over the edge as I exposed your lies over and over again. There you make claims that you break over and over again - like not to block, never to lie etc. The break them all.
travelogue200 1 year ago
So CapnnOrdinary, you also talk about never owning a sock account. Now what BS is this??? Capnnlrdenory!!!
What is so hilarious is that not only are you unable to follow the simplest of your own rules but you dare to tell others how they should live their lives. That is sad in anyone's book. There is nothing Christian in any of your patronising hypocrisy and lies. Shame on you for all your bull. True Christians laugh at how you use hatred yet pose it as 'love'. CapnnOrdinary? Capnnlrdenory!
travelogue200 1 year ago
3. This does not really speak to my point. You had said in your original video that you thought the unwed heterosexual dilemma was worse than the homosexual Christian dilemma, and I was contesting that idea, arguing that, ultimate consequences aside, the homosexual Christian's journey through life is made more difficult than the heterosexual's but virtue of his (or her) sexual preference and societal prejudices.
WannabeTesla 2 years ago
3. you're right, i didn't address your concern..... i really do believe it is worse to live life all the way thru yearning for a mate and never have it happen when it was "allowed" to happen, then to live your life knowing that your yearning is never allowed to happen. it makes it easier to concede our fate.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
4. Attempting to reach a state of mind wherein an individual rejects a specific partner is a far cry different than attempting to shut down his or her appetites completely. Besides, once again, this suggestion means the homosexual Christian needs to put forth that much more effort than the heterosexual Christian, which was my point. Additionally, I have to ask, what if God chooses not to take away the homosexual urges?
5. That's a conversation for another day, I think.
WannabeTesla 2 years ago
4. good question.... Paul talks about his "thorn" that he had to bear thru out his life... we don't know what that "thorn" was that he was pertaining to, but it shows us that we all have "thorns" that we have to persevere thru.... while i'm not gay, i have other "thorns" that hurt a lot too.... if God doesn't remove my "thorn", then i must persevere..... my reward is in Heaven, as is a gay person's.
5. yes :^)
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
@CapnnOrdinary As well as that, the scientific approach to homosexuality is going down a more biological genetic approach.
Neuroscientists have noticed that the brains of homosexual males are more like heterosexual females. And that homosexual females brains are more like heterosexual male brains.
Furthermore, scientists have also discovered that when a woman is pregnant with a male baby, her body perceives the baby as a foreign object, and antibodies are released to feminise the fetus.
040wATTcLUb 1 year ago
@040wATTcLUb (cont) With each successive time that a woman produces a male baby, the more adept her body becomes at feminsing a fetus - leading to the baby becoming gay.
I am new to studying science and neuroscience, and am looking more into it, so I am sure that there is a hell of a lot more research to indicate whether or not homosexuality is biological or not.
040wATTcLUb 1 year ago
1. nice vid, 4 stars... and thanks for being respectful.
2. "lust" is not the same as "sexual attraction". there is no such thing as a husband lusting after his wife.
3. we wont miss pizza in Heaven... and we wont miss sex.... a Christian who is a homosexual or a pedophile and doesn't act out their disposition, doesn't mean they are without the most important Hope there is. and that Hope is in Christ and salvation. we wont miss pizza in Heaven.
con. ->
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
Nicely done.
ProfMTH 2 years ago
Thanks again, Prof.
WannabeTesla 2 years ago