200% Misleading documentary film. BBC is propagating Saladin as an evil man and Lionheart as the man of God with one side story. Saladin never did anything like what they're telling in the documentary "His men raping girls, killing own Muslims for power, do Jihad against Jerusalem and kill Christians to earn Paradise." etc. Don't rely on it and do your own research.
HAHA british TV is the worst in the world. they pretend the are sophisticated and educating their people but they couldn't care less about the truth and only portray what their zionist masters tell them to portray. They are in a coma the west knows nothing and yet they still serve them as if they were their masters......
to All don't watch this. This is TOTALLY FALSE INFORMATION...I don't need to waste spending an hour where I know its already based on one sided...FAKE FALSE SCAM BBC BOOO.....
What a scam...BBC good job. Without even watching an entire movie just first 2 minutes tells the whole story. Mothers cut hair of their daughter so Salahuddin men will not rape...Subhan Allah this is so UNTRUE. BBC you are so Un-Just. May Allah give you Hidaya.
@khaab79ka that's probably what the women thought, ie 'the muslims want retribution, they'll rape us like our people did to their women'....but it didn't happen that way.
BBC doesn't really research history before it puts a documentary out there a lot Of information about Salahuddin is not true in here and the way Muslims are portrayed. ... Gives me heads up for future BBC videos ...
Lots of inaccuracies in this documentary. The "Salahuddin" character does not even pray correctly, the Call to Prayer is being done facing the wrong direction, and it portrays the Muslim soldiers as being obsessed with Salahuddin, which is also not accurate according to historical accounts.
This movie is not from Western perspective, it is Eastern perspective. Before the religion of Islam existed, in the time of Jesus, it was Jewish land. This makes it out that it was originally Arab land. The Arabs stole it from the Jews.
@shadowgovernment3000 actually the jews lost it to the greeks, then the romans shortly after...the jews then settled in persia and temporily controlled the land under persian control until the Muslims conquered the persians and the byzantines. If you're Christian then what on earth have you been doing to yourself? Your own book legitimises muslim claim, Matthew 21, the jews are just the tenants as are all people. No one 'owns' it except God.
Saladdin was not power hungry. Firstly he had to defeat the enemy within. The Muslim leaders indulged in women and alcohol and bribed by the Christians and forgot there roots of religion. Saladin would not be bought by women and alcohol and therefore his empire stretched with unlimited man power. Us Muslims don't hate the Christians as they hate Muslims. Muslims will fight to defend and they will not hesitate to give up life unlike the Christians and we will not sell our mothers and sisters for
This film is completely bias and favouring the christians. Terrorism started with the crusades killing and raping women, massacre of every human they could find.
richard was french ,saladin was a kurd thats a bad start straightaway , rules of war ? in medieval world ,slaughter everyone don't care what you tude viewers say or think in the furture ,
Saladin was responsible for thousands of civilian deaths all over the Middle East & he in fact wanted to slaughter virtually all of the residents of Jerusalem upon retaking it, this is proved by his own personal letters. But the Christians who remained to defend the walls said they would burn the whole city to the ground unless he let them go free, so he had no choice. Saladin was NOT a compassionate man NOR a particularly effective military leader as Richard overwhelmingly won all their battles
same old lies , it does not matter how much you try to deny history ! enough for us to know the truth .........keep lying ! may be you will feel better about all the blood and the injustice that 's been shed by the the so called christian in jerusalem
He is one of the leader who understand and using the true Islam religion way during his reign.. I do respect him not like the other muslim people nowdays who misunderstanding of Islam concept and jihad concept which make non-muslim people thought that we are terrorists..
1- Richard was more known for his war crimes and killing of children, women...etc. would never be a match for Salahuddin.
2- We Muslims, never looked at Salahuddin as "THE" Arab world greatest champion, go google this name instead the legendary "Khalid Ibn Al Walid" who annihilated both the MIGHTY Persian and Byzantine Empires with no more than 18000 soldiers facing 10 times their number of much better equipped soldiers, in a dozens of battles & without reinforcements...
Sad how Richard won, yet couldn't hold Jerusalem, because most men were on a pilgramage and would soon leave once they reached Jerusalem. God bless Richard
@CaesarLegions we captured Richard and those like him, as though they were chess pieces, and we dealt with them accordingly, a portion of them we set free, some decided to stay with us, whilst others payed a small fee, to be set free, that money then went to the poor. never did we use violence against our prisoners. that's why Salahuddin is better in character and piety than Richard. and it was his destiny to win
@MegaTech09 Well..... That's odd.... Cause the information I've gotten contradits your statement... Before we continue, I would like to know where you've gotten your information..?
@MegaTech09 Thank you sir, and so are you. I study my history without any racism. I don't care what my beliefs are, what are true I will say, what are false I will deny. Thank you sir, God bless you :)
@MegaTech09 Oh you mean the 72 virgins? Well... I already have mine, and she's very beautiful, and I will give up my life for her. Thank you, you as well brother, hope everyone can go to heaven. It's not everyone's fault, its the influences of Satan that makes people sin.
@CaesarLegions you have been mistaken, should we tell you the description of them ? and how could you have the women of paradise, when mankind has been cursed. for example (excretion from both genders) and menstruation from women which is considered impure. the women of paradise are free from all illnesses, filth and disease. perhaps you would like to hear our side ?
@CaesarLegions Oh you will care my friend ! the women of paradise are free from all impurities, their saliva is that of milk and honey. young, they are gorgeous, wide-eyed women of beauty, a fair skinned woman with intensely dark eyes.they are free from all evil and internal qualities such as malice, hypocrisy, swearing.they have lovely eyes that are like hidden pearls. they are also like fresh pearls because of their cleanliness and fair skin colour.
@CaesarLegions you will be dazzled by their beauty, they are virgins,they will limit their sight to their husbands so that they will not look at anyone other than them. they are like rubies in the clarity of their complexion, and are like coral in its whiteness. they are of equal age, companions of the right. enough of that ! shall we tell you something more beautiful than this ?
@MegaTech09 if you were to look at her, you would stare and continue staring for forty years. their scarf is better than the earth and all that which it contains. everything between them is illuminated in the east and west. if one of them were to step on earth, every single man would be tempted, everyone ! they wear 70 garments the marrow of the bones of the wives' legs will be seen through the flesh out of excessive beauty. they are untouched by man and jinn (creations made of fire)
@MegaTech09 I am hearing you out... Is that your messages never came through my inbox, I don't know why? I am interested, though I don't believe in that... Forgive me.
In old books Saladin called Turkish Prince... one of his brohers name was Böri(means Wolf in ancient Turkis) and other named Turanshah (means Shah of land of Turan-Turan is a name given by Iranians to Turkmenistan and Mongolia, ancient home of Turkic people).
I don't know where to begin refuting these LIES, LIES and more MASSIVE LIES. Unlike the makers of this film, I will not deny that king Richard had some nobility in his character, but SHAME on them how they've distorted chronicled history so aggressively and assassinated the NOBLE CHARACTER of Salahuddeen.
Let's not forget that according to the authentic chronicled history, it was the crusaders who raped, piliged and indiscriminately killed thousands of women, men and children of the Muslim, Jew
@21bluewave Salahuddin is a Muslim hero and Muslims come from every race in the world. He saw himself as a Muslim which is the teaching of Islam, not as a racist. So, the shame is on those who divide the ummah in races, tribes or nationalities after Allah united them by the bond of Islam and Aqeedah. It is a shame that heroes like Salahuddin too could not teach such people the lesson of unity. May Allah unite us again on Islam and bring back the glory of united Muslim ummah.
@21bluewave I'm kurd too. Nationalism didn't existed during that time, Nationalism is a European model. Not Islamic, Islam was one, from Granada to border of china. there was one union, one god, one people and one unity. This unity was destroyed by colonization and nationalism. If you look at our grandparents you will find out those ideology didn't existed, He did a lot not just for us Kurd but for all Muslims all around the world!
brakm he did do something for his own pple he was not only the king of the kurds also the king of whole middle east and northern africa he accomplished a great archivement
lies lies lies and more lies. SALADIN and his man WOULD NEVER HAVE raped the women. He was a muslim Warrior that was extremely pious. As always trying to persuade people that muslims are bad. Saladin was a righteous warrior.
When these western historians will start writing the truth!!!! Their propaganda about Salaudin he killed many Muslim but they do not tell which Muslim??? Muslim which were their friend and helping them to fight against him??? The traitor of nations??? They will never ever have courage to tell the truth
hye my brother... i think this is the most balance analysis and reasearch which is giving prides to bOTH RICHARD AND SALAUDIN....... i love you both richard and salaudin..
they inverse the role,salahuddin was a very just n right warroir,this man in talking about rape n monks hidding their treasure,all these are false n he inverse the role,Salahuddin was complimented by Richard himself n admire salahuddin....
Realising that he had no hope of holding Jerusalem even if he took it, Richard ordered a retreat. HAHAHHAHAHA another example of jewish propaganda...he was a coward and no if he entered jerusalem he was going to BE RAPED !! no mercy as he showed to the fellow muslims he killed...poor guy had to stop the crusade to return to England to retain his crown ! hahhahaah do these jews think all people are stupid like those ignorant americans ?? damnn
It is not religion that is making people crazy and fight each other. It is devil inside each of us who is continuously persuading us that only i am greatest of all, and i should be God. Which is exactly opposite of any religion.
This movie simply a propaganda against great Muslim Heros to give them bad name made by racist western media. I have read the history in true context. Salahudin was a god fearing soldier and true Muslim when he invaded the holy city he gave freedom to everybody and protect their property women Childers.this movie is full of lies. Any Muslim should not believe on such documentaries made by Jewish media.
@lbagra Asalam o Alaikum brother if u know urdu language then u should watch zaid hamid program its called YEH GHAZI. just type in yeh ghazi episode 1 it starts from hazrat khalid bin waleed and all other great soldiers of islam very informative.or only read pure islamic history from authentic source,thats what i did,never believe on these kind of documentaries their aim is to destroy great great islamic history and give them bad name.TC
"Salahuddin killed many Muslims in his pursuit for power". My arse you bunch of lying kuffar, he killed them because those leaders were a bunch of heretics who were rather like the Muslim leaders of today and they deserved to die.
As if they refer to the Muslims as Arabs and Salahuddin as an ethnic outsider. You may have this tribal racism in the west but Muslims love Salahuddin, no one thought of Salahuddin as an ethnic outsider but rather a Muslim brother, who had united the Islamic world.
I agree with the description, there's no way that Salahuddin allowed his men to rape women. Fucking bullshitters. He told his men to get up two hours before Fajr so they could pray Tahajud. Do u mean to tell me the same men that prayed the night and fasted the day, became rapists in the evening?? Salahuddin didnt want glory, he fought for the sake of Allah. Richardth the lionheart, a devout Catholic LMAO, he threatened to kill all the civilins in Jerusalem unless Salahuddin offered terms.
@teeeshizzle not only in his prayer. So many mistake in his character as you can see. The history that is told ,many of them are not true. Saladin is muslim. To know saladin refer to only muslim historian. never add up from western historian.
@calculushardcore90 And around 15:00 the entire prayer is amazing to watch. I didnt know there were two rakus in a rakat :) I have always hated how they always incorrectly show the act of praying. Such mindless researchers!
" Mothers cut off their daughters hair in hope that Saladdins men wouldn't rape them" --- oooh please stop . From the very beginning of this movie I know that this is just some propaganda .. A lot of sources show that Muslim of this time were the most noble ( not like today) and not rapers .
I don't feel like I want to waste more time on this film .. 2 min. were enough for me.
@AlaaSharfo this is what i hate, the thing that you are doing r8 now is wrong. See Muslim were good before as they are good now, there are less percentage of muslims do all this crimes, rapes. Media just makes it big deal. There will be some bad ppl in every race, religion. For instance, in India, if a muslim steals or commit a murder, in every newspaper the headline will be "a Muslim commited a murder in mumbai". And if a hindu does it, it wont be headline and it wud be A muderer comits a muder
@PainHs1 You might be speaking the truth. It's just that I live in a foreign country and I have seen how a lot of muslims behave. If I'm going to compare them to the muslims from Saladdins time then definitely they were more close to the deen of Allah.
But sure there are al hamdullillah a lot of Muslim who behave like the prophet (Pbuh) wanted us to.
I always say that media portray us Muslim badly, but we have to admit that lots of the muslims are creating that bad image by themselves.
I agree, but you should read this poem, "SHAKWA AND JAWAB-I SHAKWA(THE COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT) BY DR. SIR MUHAMMAD IQBAL". Which explains a lot about Muslims. It says, there are Muslim which are just named Muslim, but they don't do anything which Muslim does and I think they are the people who ruining our reputation.
Weren't Arabs supporting the downfall of the caliphate ??! by joining the battles against the Ottomans ... And btw, this documentary is a total joke and an obvious case of British/English self-glorification ... The crussaders were asswhiped from the holyland ... and eventually met their greatest warrior rivals... The Turks !! The crussaders were massacred during the last and final crussade
What a load of lies this story is so bias hardly any facts, the crusaders were smashed and humiliated but the film try's to elevate the crusaders you expect bbc to promote this kind of crap
Personally, i believe the actions of the Christian Soldiers when they took Jeruseleum during the 1st crusade,.(.I hate that word Crusade).., have left an indellible mark of disgrace on Christianity. Salahuddin showed how enlightened the Islamic world really was and is. If I'd been around at that time I would have wanted to be at a great mans side like him..Just to learn, watch, listen..He must have been a great charasmatic leader to be able to unite the tribes of Islam at that time..
I am a Christian. I have no ill feeling towards any ppl's of aother faiths. Not because God teaches us to love thy neighbour but because that's the man I was brought up to be by my father and mother. They taught me right from wrong.
Salahuddin? I hope I've spelled his name properly. If not I apologise. I find him fascinating. The fact that he forgave the sins of the Christians who masacred all Muslims upto and including inside the Walls of Jeruseleum shows us how great a man he really was.
Horny Crusaders.. Brains washed by Vatican as usual...cursed people...deserved to die..what did you lost at Jerusalem?? You killed Jesus Christ, with wich arguments can you defend yourself to justify this crusades?? You were the ones, who burned and destroyed the byzanthine empire an Istanbul at 1204 ( I don't call as constantinople, never!!! ) and killed innocent christians...You all are cursed therefore..You are sinners..In name of God you killed peoples..That's your way as usual even today
Oh my God! Not again, fighting on youtube comments. For my muslim friend, why u can't have patience? God is with those who are patience. N to my non-muslim friend, God will only lead those who He choose to the straight path. I have NO power w my words to convince u.
The person depicted as sultan did not know how 2 pray and other fatal mistakes which shows that no homework was done in making of this movie rather to propagate thier own thinking
richard was a muppet al quds means MORE to us then the 'holy' (horny) crusaders! thats why after the 1st crusade they took more efforts securing the northern lands and the silk roads + trade routes to china to line their pockets. silk had become fashionable in bleak and poverty stricken europe for the elitists. this is why they needed the pope to brainwahs masses for their crusades and why christians from arabia supported the muslims. jews of course were on our side after being killed in lisbon!
what a bullsh#t twisted history, many modern legitimate history scholar won't agree with this kinda nonsense. . the truth is Saladin's army were very well behave, in good moral and high discipline.
To compare Richard and the great sultan Salahuddin al Ayyubi is a mockery and a deception... Richard was the same as all of his predecessors, ruthless and blood thirsty... he was a butcher and not this noble character that the western historians fantasise about... Salahuddin was the pious military scholar and trying to compare both of them are like trying to compare the toes with fingers, they are of different leagues... nobody remembers richard, but we all pray for salahuddin!
@IRISHINFIDEL he was very merciful in negotiations and of course he foguht the warring factions to unfiy the armies. otherwise he would never have won. he didnt eat babies like richard and freed many prisoners in jerusalem. the west were the ones that named him saladin the merciful, not the arabs! any objective historian will say the crusaders were backward and barbaric the arabs were advanced at that time and civilised. i know u cant handle it but it is true.
@IRISHINFIDEL Could you provide some evidence for your wild claims? Is this your attempt to discredit Salahuddin? Seriously, you need to try harder. Give people a little more credit, do you really think they are going to read your pathetic little lie, and take it as fact? It is you who needs to learn history. Not even those who were defeated by Salahuddin claim he " killed more muslims than Richard did"!! I suggest you read up on what non-Muslim, non Arab historians have to say about Salahuddi!!
i dont feel sorry for those muslims who were killed i believe you die in honour and fight to the death and never surrender to the enemy even if i am in such a situation i will know if i surrrender i deserve no mercy but brutality so did they as for my capture i would rather be a sunni muslim captive than a christian or shiite one but am not a soldier so this is just my conclusion after seing how prisoners of war are treated form one place to the other
I'm proud of him as a muslim and as a kurd I don't know why some Turks think his Turkish lol no where in history says he's turkish ... If what he did was for Kurdistan then kurdistan would be very very big now but at that time people only cared about islam not country
it doesnt portray real history because you dont tell of the muslim slaughter of christians after richard killed the muslim prisoners. i like how you try to tell others what your concept of the truth is without revealing about muslim atrocities as well
do more and more like that /time is near to witness the true side of history /wait allah is coming surely he is coming /he is coming with the panishment mankind ever witness / that time i believe this film maker wont find his story any more
This video dsnt show real n true History ... Shows the Great hero salahuddin as a villain..Westenr propaganda against Islam , its heroes n Islamic rich history.
do not respond with them kind of peoples... they are jus their to wind us up... as a muslim i knw victory is written only thing we can do as a muslim is to pray and not be angry bout it... i understand it hurts watching our brothers&sisters suffer lets all together jus pray to allah...
@SuperYoungmuslim sorry but are ur sisters&brothers suffering?. To be fair there are countless things you can do to change that. Praying isnt the only way. And from a western point of view they didnt show King Richar Lionheart for the man he supposedly was. Hope u noticed the SUPPOSEDLY cuz even how well history is documented we will never EVER know the REAL TRUTH. (if u dont agree with the last sentence u are indeed a moron) :))
salahuddin ayyubi is a legend a true warrior... he put his heart out for us muslim. if only the world muslims leaders fought of him then this world for muslim would be in peace. our so called kings are too busy bout making money and jus watch the brothers&sisters suffer. salahuddin didnt nationalism any muslim... he saw every human being as one, dont matter were u come from what colour you are. we are muslim and we all stand for ISLAM...
today muslims are called barbaric! driven by mad religion! i ask people the apparently so called great richard butchered 3000 unarmed muslims! and in 1st crusade millions were raped killed burnt by the crusaders! and salauddin forgave all! now tell me who is barbaric us or u??
this film is nt base on the truth. some part i agree but the reality is Richard was defeat by saladin clearly twice he was never able to reach near to holy city. on the other hand saladin fight with Richard on the open battlefield as comparer to the time when he won the war of holy city the christen worriers stay in the city and fight with salandin. know that wht i call a worrier face it enemy from the front
I am unable to understand , what is holy about this holy city for which hundred of thousands were killed ,, except the two commanders were driven by their own passion to hold power, such a stupid idea to lose the lives,
Can someone who criticizes this documentary as biased please explain how this film contradicts what is known of Salah ad-Din? This film shows that Salah ad-Din displayed mercy and chivalry, while Richard slaughtered prisoners of war - which some of you add in your criticisms below. I wonder if some of you even made it half-way through the video...
200% Misleading documentary film. BBC is propagating Saladin as an evil man and Lionheart as the man of God with one side story. Saladin never did anything like what they're telling in the documentary "His men raping girls, killing own Muslims for power, do Jihad against Jerusalem and kill Christians to earn Paradise." etc. Don't rely on it and do your own research.
SHAME ON YOU BBC!
Religion0fAbraham 13 hours ago
FUCK YOU BBC you english scum, tell the truth or STFU
NasseerBoss 23 hours ago
FAKE FAKE FAKE........... MIS LEADING THE STORY
sheikho143 1 day ago
totally fake information in this video about Saladin and crescent warfare
silentkiller9658 2 days ago
bull shit fucking ass hole tell da true islam is peace if you dont know fuck ur mouth b4 telling da story
gujjarbadmash302 2 days ago
watch here bit.ly\z2t7AT
adlinecockxus 4 days ago
This is definitely a misleading video of Salahuddin. Good try though.
pjack41 4 days ago
HAHA british TV is the worst in the world. they pretend the are sophisticated and educating their people but they couldn't care less about the truth and only portray what their zionist masters tell them to portray. They are in a coma the west knows nothing and yet they still serve them as if they were their masters......
greencl0th 6 days ago
to All don't watch this. This is TOTALLY FALSE INFORMATION...I don't need to waste spending an hour where I know its already based on one sided...FAKE FALSE SCAM BBC BOOO.....
khaab79ka 1 week ago 11
What a scam...BBC good job. Without even watching an entire movie just first 2 minutes tells the whole story. Mothers cut hair of their daughter so Salahuddin men will not rape...Subhan Allah this is so UNTRUE. BBC you are so Un-Just. May Allah give you Hidaya.
khaab79ka 1 week ago
@khaab79ka that's probably what the women thought, ie 'the muslims want retribution, they'll rape us like our people did to their women'....but it didn't happen that way.
molvicorleone 5 days ago
Comment removed
steveandon63 1 week ago
What Salahuddin Did
1. Fought and United Muslim World
2. Fought for the Land of Jeruselum to get revenge for the Crusades Injustice
3. Left all christian alive as per the Islamic Teaching etc
What Richard Did
1. Fought to get fame.
2. Killed people who were not even in Jeruselum and Killed them Unjustly
3. Wanted to use his Sister to cheat people.. Like normaly the westerner does nowadays also.
4. Was failed even to touch the walls of Jeruslem.
LOL
hamidshahpopal 2 weeks ago
BBC doesn't really research history before it puts a documentary out there a lot Of information about Salahuddin is not true in here and the way Muslims are portrayed. ... Gives me heads up for future BBC videos ...
koolgoose2 2 weeks ago
Lots of inaccuracies in this documentary. The "Salahuddin" character does not even pray correctly, the Call to Prayer is being done facing the wrong direction, and it portrays the Muslim soldiers as being obsessed with Salahuddin, which is also not accurate according to historical accounts.
SamabulaBoy 2 weeks ago
This movie is not from Western perspective, it is Eastern perspective. Before the religion of Islam existed, in the time of Jesus, it was Jewish land. This makes it out that it was originally Arab land. The Arabs stole it from the Jews.
shadowgovernment3000 2 weeks ago
@shadowgovernment3000 actually the jews lost it to the greeks, then the romans shortly after...the jews then settled in persia and temporily controlled the land under persian control until the Muslims conquered the persians and the byzantines. If you're Christian then what on earth have you been doing to yourself? Your own book legitimises muslim claim, Matthew 21, the jews are just the tenants as are all people. No one 'owns' it except God.
molvicorleone 5 days ago
Saladdin was not power hungry. Firstly he had to defeat the enemy within. The Muslim leaders indulged in women and alcohol and bribed by the Christians and forgot there roots of religion. Saladin would not be bought by women and alcohol and therefore his empire stretched with unlimited man power. Us Muslims don't hate the Christians as they hate Muslims. Muslims will fight to defend and they will not hesitate to give up life unlike the Christians and we will not sell our mothers and sisters for
AlamBarzakh99 3 weeks ago
Completely different to history recorded.
AlamBarzakh99 3 weeks ago
This film is completely bias and favouring the christians. Terrorism started with the crusades killing and raping women, massacre of every human they could find.
AtaArticles 3 weeks ago
richard was french ,saladin was a kurd thats a bad start straightaway , rules of war ? in medieval world ,slaughter everyone don't care what you tude viewers say or think in the furture ,
mcgeogheganj 3 weeks ago
Saladin was responsible for thousands of civilian deaths all over the Middle East & he in fact wanted to slaughter virtually all of the residents of Jerusalem upon retaking it, this is proved by his own personal letters. But the Christians who remained to defend the walls said they would burn the whole city to the ground unless he let them go free, so he had no choice. Saladin was NOT a compassionate man NOR a particularly effective military leader as Richard overwhelmingly won all their battles
rater1113 3 weeks ago
same old lies , it does not matter how much you try to deny history ! enough for us to know the truth .........keep lying ! may be you will feel better about all the blood and the injustice that 's been shed by the the so called christian in jerusalem
Franksinatra321 3 weeks ago
it is in a way funny that the man who would be called "lion heart" was a homosexual.
truvianni 3 weeks ago
No matter what the conflict or the combatants, the killing of women and children will always make peace difficult to achieve.
maskedavenger777 4 weeks ago
“I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ.” M. Gandhi
veritas1031 4 weeks ago 10
this video is load of bullshit they critisize saladin in a unbelivable way
MrShahwais 1 month ago
He is one of the leader who understand and using the true Islam religion way during his reign.. I do respect him not like the other muslim people nowdays who misunderstanding of Islam concept and jihad concept which make non-muslim people thought that we are terrorists..
khairul493 1 month ago
just as there wasa crusade then, there is a crusade now
just as their was salahuddin there will be another like him
harrysafraz 1 month ago
oh shut up ..Richard was sissy
smbsmb321 1 month ago
1- Richard was more known for his war crimes and killing of children, women...etc. would never be a match for Salahuddin.
2- We Muslims, never looked at Salahuddin as "THE" Arab world greatest champion, go google this name instead the legendary "Khalid Ibn Al Walid" who annihilated both the MIGHTY Persian and Byzantine Empires with no more than 18000 soldiers facing 10 times their number of much better equipped soldiers, in a dozens of battles & without reinforcements...
yourbestfriend1978 1 month ago
Sad how Richard won, yet couldn't hold Jerusalem, because most men were on a pilgramage and would soon leave once they reached Jerusalem. God bless Richard
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions we captured Richard and those like him, as though they were chess pieces, and we dealt with them accordingly, a portion of them we set free, some decided to stay with us, whilst others payed a small fee, to be set free, that money then went to the poor. never did we use violence against our prisoners. that's why Salahuddin is better in character and piety than Richard. and it was his destiny to win
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 Well..... That's odd.... Cause the information I've gotten contradits your statement... Before we continue, I would like to know where you've gotten your information..?
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
Origin unknown
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 Forgive me... I meant to spell "Contradicts". Well we all make mistakes lol.
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 Exactly the western view is racist, and not precise.. The Islamic version is the best and most reliable
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions you are indeed the one who speaks the truth !
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 Thank you sir, and so are you. I study my history without any racism. I don't care what my beliefs are, what are true I will say, what are false I will deny. Thank you sir, God bless you :)
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions God bless you, too and i hope you have a place in heaven ! should we describe to you the beautiful women of paradise ?
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 Oh you mean the 72 virgins? Well... I already have mine, and she's very beautiful, and I will give up my life for her. Thank you, you as well brother, hope everyone can go to heaven. It's not everyone's fault, its the influences of Satan that makes people sin.
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions you have been mistaken, should we tell you the description of them ? and how could you have the women of paradise, when mankind has been cursed. for example (excretion from both genders) and menstruation from women which is considered impure. the women of paradise are free from all illnesses, filth and disease. perhaps you would like to hear our side ?
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 Well... I don't care, honestly... I love her. And sure ill hear the description.
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions Oh you will care my friend ! the women of paradise are free from all impurities, their saliva is that of milk and honey. young, they are gorgeous, wide-eyed women of beauty, a fair skinned woman with intensely dark eyes.they are free from all evil and internal qualities such as malice, hypocrisy, swearing.they have lovely eyes that are like hidden pearls. they are also like fresh pearls because of their cleanliness and fair skin colour.
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions you will be dazzled by their beauty, they are virgins,they will limit their sight to their husbands so that they will not look at anyone other than them. they are like rubies in the clarity of their complexion, and are like coral in its whiteness. they are of equal age, companions of the right. enough of that ! shall we tell you something more beautiful than this ?
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 It is the holy prophet of Allah (pbuh), I know what your thinking, but can you at least hear me out ?
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 if you were to look at her, you would stare and continue staring for forty years. their scarf is better than the earth and all that which it contains. everything between them is illuminated in the east and west. if one of them were to step on earth, every single man would be tempted, everyone ! they wear 70 garments the marrow of the bones of the wives' legs will be seen through the flesh out of excessive beauty. they are untouched by man and jinn (creations made of fire)
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions Its the holy prophet of Allah (pbuh) now you might not be interested, considering your not a Muslim, but can you at least hear me out.
MegaTech09 1 month ago
@MegaTech09 I am hearing you out... Is that your messages never came through my inbox, I don't know why? I am interested, though I don't believe in that... Forgive me.
CaesarLegions 1 month ago
@CaesarLegions Shall we describe to you the holy prophet (pbuh). that you may see why he is considered the best of creation. Shall we ?
MegaTech09 4 weeks ago
@MegaTech09 Yes, please.
CaesarLegions 4 weeks ago
In old books Saladin called Turkish Prince... one of his brohers name was Böri(means Wolf in ancient Turkis) and other named Turanshah (means Shah of land of Turan-Turan is a name given by Iranians to Turkmenistan and Mongolia, ancient home of Turkic people).
Why people calls him Kurd, I can't understand...
MrDenocan 1 month ago
I am a christian also respect Saladin he was a good man.
Trogdor7654 1 month ago
I love sallah u din ayubi. He was hero of Islam and brave soldier. He never fought for power but Islam. He is my ideal.
saqib25 1 month ago
a great kurd. but why do not the Arab respect the kurdish will to create a kurdish state
MrKurdishvoice 1 month ago
انا کوردی وفخور جدا بصلاح الدین، واستغرب من اقوال بعض قومیین جهلة من الکرد حین یقولون انه لم یفعل شئ لقومه
کان عصر صلاح الدین مختلف عن عصرنا لم تنتشر بعد فکرة القومیة
mymamoodi 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know where to begin refuting these LIES, LIES and more MASSIVE LIES. Unlike the makers of this film, I will not deny that king Richard had some nobility in his character, but SHAME on them how they've distorted chronicled history so aggressively and assassinated the NOBLE CHARACTER of Salahuddeen.
Let's not forget that according to the authentic chronicled history, it was the crusaders who raped, piliged and indiscriminately killed thousands of women, men and children of the Muslim, Jew
timatiamo22 1 month ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
as a kurd..im proud of saladin cos he was a great leader... but unfortunatly he didnt do anything 4 his own ppl...what a shame.
21bluewave 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@21bluewave Salahuddin is a Muslim hero and Muslims come from every race in the world. He saw himself as a Muslim which is the teaching of Islam, not as a racist. So, the shame is on those who divide the ummah in races, tribes or nationalities after Allah united them by the bond of Islam and Aqeedah. It is a shame that heroes like Salahuddin too could not teach such people the lesson of unity. May Allah unite us again on Islam and bring back the glory of united Muslim ummah.
khilafahconcepts 1 month ago 26
@21bluewave shame on u.......i think u r non muslim
72wasif 1 month ago
@21bluewave WaoW ... Read the history don't make your opinion from this movie
safwaanmehboob 1 month ago
Comment removed
delshad82 1 month ago
Comment removed
delshad82 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@21bluewave I'm kurd too. Nationalism didn't existed during that time, Nationalism is a European model. Not Islamic, Islam was one, from Granada to border of china. there was one union, one god, one people and one unity. This unity was destroyed by colonization and nationalism. If you look at our grandparents you will find out those ideology didn't existed, He did a lot not just for us Kurd but for all Muslims all around the world!
delshad82 1 month ago
@21bluewave
brakm he did do something for his own pple he was not only the king of the kurds also the king of whole middle east and northern africa he accomplished a great archivement
MrShahwais 1 month ago
Richard wanted to convert to islam but unfortunately he was poisoned.If not the people of england will be muslims.
mrhangman96 1 month ago
Want to learn about the truth of Salahuddin Ayuubi who NEVER LOST A BATTLE!!! Listen here: watch?v=zNJIfHt9-d8
makahar1 1 month ago
muslims raping the women?!!!! WHAT A COMPLETE LOAD OF BS!!!!
makahar1 1 month ago
@makahar1
jesus not from mary but mary have a slut with another man. hahaha . please respect another religion .
ScanNinViDeo 1 month ago
neden türk olduğundan ve aylesinden bahsetmiyor bence cok yanlış çünkü islamın ayakta durması Türkler sayesindedir....
HanBurak 1 month ago
This video is full of lies. Richard the big hero but failed to take Ursyalum twice..stupid.
borrogove 1 month ago
Saladin Aladin....
Nightberrii 1 month ago
There is no such thing as Saladin, it is SALAHUDDIN, you corrupting crusader scum.
IMnotSAS 1 month ago
Saladin vs Richard
Saladin wins because he was the one who had Jerusalem under his command!
Nasbayern 1 month ago
awkwardly , now jurusalem is under jew.. funny shit..
max206fs 1 month ago
Muslims bow down to God, Christians bow down to the cross!
Nasbayern 1 month ago
lies lies lies and more lies. SALADIN and his man WOULD NEVER HAVE raped the women. He was a muslim Warrior that was extremely pious. As always trying to persuade people that muslims are bad. Saladin was a righteous warrior.
ishh911 2 months ago
When these western historians will start writing the truth!!!! Their propaganda about Salaudin he killed many Muslim but they do not tell which Muslim??? Muslim which were their friend and helping them to fight against him??? The traitor of nations??? They will never ever have courage to tell the truth
chullo78 2 months ago
Someone told to Richard that Jaffa was Jerusalem................Bwahahahahaha on this twist of facts.
kapil1ly4u 2 months ago
God is greatest!!
Amer300986 2 months ago
Please Can You Translate It in Urdu
nitrome7 2 months ago
hye my brother... i think this is the most balance analysis and reasearch which is giving prides to bOTH RICHARD AND SALAUDIN....... i love you both richard and salaudin..
usman172 2 months ago
SALLAH UDEN IS THE FATHER OF RICHARD LION HEART>>>SALAHDEN GIVE NEW LIFE IN JESUSS
surfing4lifeful 2 months ago
usual western propaganda where salahuddin is portrayed as the bad guy. please brothers dont rely on bbc to tell the truth.
HAMIDK007 2 months ago
they inverse the role,salahuddin was a very just n right warroir,this man in talking about rape n monks hidding their treasure,all these are false n he inverse the role,Salahuddin was complimented by Richard himself n admire salahuddin....
85oomar 3 months ago
Realising that he had no hope of holding Jerusalem even if he took it, Richard ordered a retreat. HAHAHHAHAHA another example of jewish propaganda...he was a coward and no if he entered jerusalem he was going to BE RAPED !! no mercy as he showed to the fellow muslims he killed...poor guy had to stop the crusade to return to England to retain his crown ! hahhahaah do these jews think all people are stupid like those ignorant americans ?? damnn
mehdibenabbou88 3 months ago
pls visit for practical islam toward-khilafat.blogspot.com, email partylabour@gmail.com
partylabour 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is not religion that is making people crazy and fight each other. It is devil inside each of us who is continuously persuading us that only i am greatest of all, and i should be God. Which is exactly opposite of any religion.
myinfotech001 3 months ago
You can realy see that this film was made treu the eyes of a westerner....Huge eddits and mistakes are been shown. Great western propaganda again.
Matroos0611 3 months ago 4
This movie simply a propaganda against great Muslim Heros to give them bad name made by racist western media. I have read the history in true context. Salahudin was a god fearing soldier and true Muslim when he invaded the holy city he gave freedom to everybody and protect their property women Childers.this movie is full of lies. Any Muslim should not believe on such documentaries made by Jewish media.
shaniuaj 3 months ago 3
@shaniuaj do you know a movie of his story but without the propaganda? i'm muslim and i recently heard of him :) thanks
lbagra 3 months ago
@lbagra Asalam o Alaikum brother if u know urdu language then u should watch zaid hamid program its called YEH GHAZI. just type in yeh ghazi episode 1 it starts from hazrat khalid bin waleed and all other great soldiers of islam very informative.or only read pure islamic history from authentic source,thats what i did,never believe on these kind of documentaries their aim is to destroy great great islamic history and give them bad name.TC
shaniuaj 3 months ago
Respond to this video... WE LOVE SALAHUDIN GREAT SOLDIER
shaniuaj 3 months ago
this documentary is biased..kindom of heaven movie made by western director looks much better than this....
sanny819 3 months ago
All histories has been corrupted :(
zamowner1 3 months ago
This is the worst description of Salahuddin ever. They make him look like a thug. Fucking Kuffar. I don't trust them one bit.
SuperOs1000 3 months ago
"Salahuddin killed many Muslims in his pursuit for power". My arse you bunch of lying kuffar, he killed them because those leaders were a bunch of heretics who were rather like the Muslim leaders of today and they deserved to die.
SuperOs1000 3 months ago
As if they refer to the Muslims as Arabs and Salahuddin as an ethnic outsider. You may have this tribal racism in the west but Muslims love Salahuddin, no one thought of Salahuddin as an ethnic outsider but rather a Muslim brother, who had united the Islamic world.
SuperOs1000 3 months ago
I agree with the description, there's no way that Salahuddin allowed his men to rape women. Fucking bullshitters. He told his men to get up two hours before Fajr so they could pray Tahajud. Do u mean to tell me the same men that prayed the night and fasted the day, became rapists in the evening?? Salahuddin didnt want glory, he fought for the sake of Allah. Richardth the lionheart, a devout Catholic LMAO, he threatened to kill all the civilins in Jerusalem unless Salahuddin offered terms.
SuperOs1000 3 months ago
fake story .. saladin was a very good man
ddddddccscccc 3 months ago
at 20:45 the saladin character prayed wrongly. the last salam began with left side. it should the right side first. What a mistake??
calculushardcore90 3 months ago 37
@calculushardcore90 There are plenty of mistakes in his prayer. Pretty sad how muslims can't even make their own forms of media now a days. :/
teeeshizzle 3 months ago
@teeeshizzle not only in his prayer. So many mistake in his character as you can see. The history that is told ,many of them are not true. Saladin is muslim. To know saladin refer to only muslim historian. never add up from western historian.
calculushardcore90 3 months ago
@calculushardcore90 bcz this movie acster not muslim
surfing4lifeful 2 months ago
@calculushardcore90 The movie is probably flipped during most scenes so that it can be legally uploaded onto Youtube or something.
light101 1 month ago
@calculushardcore90 There was also two Rakus instead of one
safwaanmehboob 1 month ago
@calculushardcore90 And around 15:00 the entire prayer is amazing to watch. I didnt know there were two rakus in a rakat :) I have always hated how they always incorrectly show the act of praying. Such mindless researchers!
syadkaalsh 1 month ago
Comment removed
ThornsTV 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LIES LIES LIES ....................
bichoobhatti92 3 months ago
" Mothers cut off their daughters hair in hope that Saladdins men wouldn't rape them" --- oooh please stop . From the very beginning of this movie I know that this is just some propaganda .. A lot of sources show that Muslim of this time were the most noble ( not like today) and not rapers .
I don't feel like I want to waste more time on this film .. 2 min. were enough for me.
AlaaSharfo 3 months ago 3
@AlaaSharfo this is what i hate, the thing that you are doing r8 now is wrong. See Muslim were good before as they are good now, there are less percentage of muslims do all this crimes, rapes. Media just makes it big deal. There will be some bad ppl in every race, religion. For instance, in India, if a muslim steals or commit a murder, in every newspaper the headline will be "a Muslim commited a murder in mumbai". And if a hindu does it, it wont be headline and it wud be A muderer comits a muder
PainHs1 3 months ago
@PainHs1 You might be speaking the truth. It's just that I live in a foreign country and I have seen how a lot of muslims behave. If I'm going to compare them to the muslims from Saladdins time then definitely they were more close to the deen of Allah.
But sure there are al hamdullillah a lot of Muslim who behave like the prophet (Pbuh) wanted us to.
I always say that media portray us Muslim badly, but we have to admit that lots of the muslims are creating that bad image by themselves.
AlaaSharfo 3 months ago
@AlaaSharfo
I agree, but you should read this poem, "SHAKWA AND JAWAB-I SHAKWA(THE COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT) BY DR. SIR MUHAMMAD IQBAL". Which explains a lot about Muslims. It says, there are Muslim which are just named Muslim, but they don't do anything which Muslim does and I think they are the people who ruining our reputation.
PainHs1 3 months ago
Weren't Arabs supporting the downfall of the caliphate ??! by joining the battles against the Ottomans ... And btw, this documentary is a total joke and an obvious case of British/English self-glorification ... The crussaders were asswhiped from the holyland ... and eventually met their greatest warrior rivals... The Turks !! The crussaders were massacred during the last and final crussade
Borat911 3 months ago
"richards heroic deeds..." - richard was a criminal and a butcher.
this is proof that in the eyes of the filthy koffar criminals are heroes....
they say criminals killed their god for their sins. go kiss the jews who curse ur god and "killed" him for killing him for ur sins.
but u want to know the truth? noone died foir ur sins, jesus was saved. which means that ur doomed.
khalilrabee 3 months ago
LIE AT ALL...
salmanmanzoor1 3 months ago
What a load of lies this story is so bias hardly any facts, the crusaders were smashed and humiliated but the film try's to elevate the crusaders you expect bbc to promote this kind of crap
xhibits1 3 months ago
Personally, i believe the actions of the Christian Soldiers when they took Jeruseleum during the 1st crusade,.(.I hate that word Crusade).., have left an indellible mark of disgrace on Christianity. Salahuddin showed how enlightened the Islamic world really was and is. If I'd been around at that time I would have wanted to be at a great mans side like him..Just to learn, watch, listen..He must have been a great charasmatic leader to be able to unite the tribes of Islam at that time..
reaper060670 3 months ago
I am a Christian. I have no ill feeling towards any ppl's of aother faiths. Not because God teaches us to love thy neighbour but because that's the man I was brought up to be by my father and mother. They taught me right from wrong.
Salahuddin? I hope I've spelled his name properly. If not I apologise. I find him fascinating. The fact that he forgave the sins of the Christians who masacred all Muslims upto and including inside the Walls of Jeruseleum shows us how great a man he really was.
reaper060670 3 months ago 2
This is Saladin who plays chess not Salahuddin Ayyubi
micromail888 3 months ago
Horny Crusaders.. Brains washed by Vatican as usual...cursed people...deserved to die..what did you lost at Jerusalem?? You killed Jesus Christ, with wich arguments can you defend yourself to justify this crusades?? You were the ones, who burned and destroyed the byzanthine empire an Istanbul at 1204 ( I don't call as constantinople, never!!! ) and killed innocent christians...You all are cursed therefore..You are sinners..In name of God you killed peoples..That's your way as usual even today
Gitanes1972 3 months ago
that's got weak resources.
filming bullshit
away97 3 months ago
the guy who made this must be in love with richard's dick,
abdelsx 3 months ago 2
this has nothing to do with actual story of Saladin , this is a straight up case forging of history.
abdelsx 3 months ago
This is joke with history. This is heavily biased video. This is a slap on the face of true history.................... :(
leothewarrior1 4 months ago
Oh my God! Not again, fighting on youtube comments. For my muslim friend, why u can't have patience? God is with those who are patience. N to my non-muslim friend, God will only lead those who He choose to the straight path. I have NO power w my words to convince u.
Case solved. Peace out.
GETnBeEnlightened 4 months ago 2
The person depicted as sultan did not know how 2 pray and other fatal mistakes which shows that no homework was done in making of this movie rather to propagate thier own thinking
saratorious 4 months ago
richard was a muppet al quds means MORE to us then the 'holy' (horny) crusaders! thats why after the 1st crusade they took more efforts securing the northern lands and the silk roads + trade routes to china to line their pockets. silk had become fashionable in bleak and poverty stricken europe for the elitists. this is why they needed the pope to brainwahs masses for their crusades and why christians from arabia supported the muslims. jews of course were on our side after being killed in lisbon!
boxermaf 4 months ago 7
SALAHADDIN EYYUBI : Subhaan ALLAH what a wonderfull human beiing , a man with faith and real balls !
TheLastOttoman1978 3 months ago
what a bullsh#t twisted history, many modern legitimate history scholar won't agree with this kinda nonsense. . the truth is Saladin's army were very well behave, in good moral and high discipline.
amatwolf 4 months ago
To compare Richard and the great sultan Salahuddin al Ayyubi is a mockery and a deception... Richard was the same as all of his predecessors, ruthless and blood thirsty... he was a butcher and not this noble character that the western historians fantasise about... Salahuddin was the pious military scholar and trying to compare both of them are like trying to compare the toes with fingers, they are of different leagues... nobody remembers richard, but we all pray for salahuddin!
mo8blazer 4 months ago
@mo8blazer you know nothing about saladin,saladin killed more muslims than Richard did,so go and learn some real history
IRISHINFIDEL 4 months ago
@IRISHINFIDEL he was very merciful in negotiations and of course he foguht the warring factions to unfiy the armies. otherwise he would never have won. he didnt eat babies like richard and freed many prisoners in jerusalem. the west were the ones that named him saladin the merciful, not the arabs! any objective historian will say the crusaders were backward and barbaric the arabs were advanced at that time and civilised. i know u cant handle it but it is true.
boxermaf 4 months ago 2
@IRISHINFIDEL Could you provide some evidence for your wild claims? Is this your attempt to discredit Salahuddin? Seriously, you need to try harder. Give people a little more credit, do you really think they are going to read your pathetic little lie, and take it as fact? It is you who needs to learn history. Not even those who were defeated by Salahuddin claim he " killed more muslims than Richard did"!! I suggest you read up on what non-Muslim, non Arab historians have to say about Salahuddi!!
123kimbo123 4 months ago
i dont feel sorry for those muslims who were killed i believe you die in honour and fight to the death and never surrender to the enemy even if i am in such a situation i will know if i surrrender i deserve no mercy but brutality so did they as for my capture i would rather be a sunni muslim captive than a christian or shiite one but am not a soldier so this is just my conclusion after seing how prisoners of war are treated form one place to the other
minfrom 4 months ago
I'm proud of him as a muslim and as a kurd I don't know why some Turks think his Turkish lol no where in history says he's turkish ... If what he did was for Kurdistan then kurdistan would be very very big now but at that time people only cared about islam not country
alwayzKURD 4 months ago
Comment removed
cvnbvx 4 months ago
it doesnt portray real history because you dont tell of the muslim slaughter of christians after richard killed the muslim prisoners. i like how you try to tell others what your concept of the truth is without revealing about muslim atrocities as well
allenmarlatt 4 months ago
this is not a true history
plz read the books of muslim writers to learn the true history
MegaAhsan143 4 months ago
can you upload Hindi Ver. i want this
HasimDaYaDaRa 4 months ago
how bias this story...liesss!
thehobbity 4 months ago
That is not ture histroy.......
umersuzette 4 months ago
Salahudin don,t killed his uncal...it,s not ture hes was a such great warrior
umersuzette 4 months ago
do more and more like that /time is near to witness the true side of history /wait allah is coming surely he is coming /he is coming with the panishment mankind ever witness / that time i believe this film maker wont find his story any more
bodarbodrul 5 months ago
this story is totally lie.. screw mainstream media !
mrbisanjo 5 months ago
This video dsnt show real n true History ... Shows the Great hero salahuddin as a villain..Westenr propaganda against Islam , its heroes n Islamic rich history.
KhanGhazanfer 5 months ago 11
do not respond with them kind of peoples... they are jus their to wind us up... as a muslim i knw victory is written only thing we can do as a muslim is to pray and not be angry bout it... i understand it hurts watching our brothers&sisters suffer lets all together jus pray to allah...
SuperYoungmuslim 5 months ago
Comment removed
Amaldin2 4 months ago
@SuperYoungmuslim sorry but are ur sisters&brothers suffering?. To be fair there are countless things you can do to change that. Praying isnt the only way. And from a western point of view they didnt show King Richar Lionheart for the man he supposedly was. Hope u noticed the SUPPOSEDLY cuz even how well history is documented we will never EVER know the REAL TRUTH. (if u dont agree with the last sentence u are indeed a moron) :))
Amaldin2 4 months ago
where is the ameeni of the ummah..! wake up wake up
SuperYoungmuslim 5 months ago
salahuddin ayyubi is a legend a true warrior... he put his heart out for us muslim. if only the world muslims leaders fought of him then this world for muslim would be in peace. our so called kings are too busy bout making money and jus watch the brothers&sisters suffer. salahuddin didnt nationalism any muslim... he saw every human being as one, dont matter were u come from what colour you are. we are muslim and we all stand for ISLAM...
SuperYoungmuslim 5 months ago
what u can say "don't take ur history from ur enemy """
madomad1000 5 months ago
it's ur film watch our own """
madomad1000 5 months ago
lots of lie..or is easy 2 say "tambirang kmuorg sna penipu"...
shazlan882 5 months ago
come on man, salahuddin didnt look like a smackhead! they cud have gotten a better looking 'saladin' lol
eastlondone2 5 months ago in playlist Films and documentaries
today muslims are called barbaric! driven by mad religion! i ask people the apparently so called great richard butchered 3000 unarmed muslims! and in 1st crusade millions were raped killed burnt by the crusaders! and salauddin forgave all! now tell me who is barbaric us or u??
sherkhanpak100 5 months ago
Muslim warriors did not rape a single female !
motriplea 5 months ago
@motriplea Yes youre right. History could not be cheated.
63sbu 5 months ago
in movie of " kingdom of heaven " they showed richard a cowered, should watch that movie.
transparentgrass 5 months ago
very
transparentgrass 5 months ago
RICHARD WAS A GAY TOO
MegaRajasinga 5 months ago
this film is nt base on the truth. some part i agree but the reality is Richard was defeat by saladin clearly twice he was never able to reach near to holy city. on the other hand saladin fight with Richard on the open battlefield as comparer to the time when he won the war of holy city the christen worriers stay in the city and fight with salandin. know that wht i call a worrier face it enemy from the front
rzabrar 5 months ago
I am unable to understand , what is holy about this holy city for which hundred of thousands were killed ,, except the two commanders were driven by their own passion to hold power, such a stupid idea to lose the lives,
medusaachla 5 months ago
oof course they are not telling the true history coz richard was defeated by salahuddin >
ihabullah 5 months ago
Can someone who criticizes this documentary as biased please explain how this film contradicts what is known of Salah ad-Din? This film shows that Salah ad-Din displayed mercy and chivalry, while Richard slaughtered prisoners of war - which some of you add in your criticisms below. I wonder if some of you even made it half-way through the video...
MstrirSage 5 months ago
Thanks for the upload !!!
SHGRAPHICS 5 months ago
verry lier!!!!!
bagoeszahra9 5 months ago
Idiot Below me
fuckingcumification 5 months ago
bad - masonic lies