Yes. He's thorough on the science, he actually presents evidence as opposed to just referring to the sheer number of pro-AGW peer review papers published and attacking credibility as the AGW crowd does.
The case against AGW is formidable.....The Earth has been warming steadily for 300 years, well before humans could've had any impact, and cooled for the past 8 years.
The medieval Warm period was warmer than today, Global ice levels are normal and sea levels have barely risen.
I predicted the attack on meat sources years ago. They have to deprive us of protein to make us weaker, it's very simple.
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago 3
Yes. He's thorough on the science, he actually presents evidence as opposed to just referring to the sheer number of pro-AGW peer review papers published and attacking credibility as the AGW crowd does.
The case against AGW is formidable.....The Earth has been warming steadily for 300 years, well before humans could've had any impact, and cooled for the past 8 years.
The medieval Warm period was warmer than today, Global ice levels are normal and sea levels have barely risen.
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago
This guy must be correct, otherwise...... Why would AL Gore runs away from this guy and refuse to debate him.
FWIW, this guy also completely proved that AL Gores Craptacular Documentary is nothing more than a bold face lie!
kramr007 2 years ago 7