Added: 2 years ago
From: finnair27
Views: 162,720
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (97)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DAMNIT WILSON, I TOLD YOU NOT TO PUT THE FIRECRACKER SHIPMENT NEXT TO THE BOX OF LIGHTERS!

  • I *knew* I shouldn't have shipped that two-ton box of fishing sinkers by Fed-ex!"

  • 見事にひ

  • 見事にひっくり返った。

  • God damnit so that's why I didn't get my package

  • tokyoじゃなくてchibaですよー。

    tokyo not chiba

  • R.I.P to the Crew of that FedEx MD-11

  • Damn! That plane got some air!

  • No snozzle's on the ARFF trucks... that's a shame as they are specifically for getting water in and on the fire coming threw the top (technically the bottom since the plane flipped).

  • Both pilots were killed. MD 11 does not handle like a DC 10. Pilot induced oscillations are a real problem. The people that dreamed up this conversion and certified it as airworthy should spend the rest of their lives in prison.

  • Just that crash happened to wrong persons.But they died as they were.Brave and great pilots , just everyone has mistakes but this wasent. R.I.P From Estonia.

  • The final seconds of the approach to landing were edited out. Why?

  • @bethpage89 There was probably nothing "visually" unusual about the approach just the rate of decent upon impacting the runway possibly due to windshear that's maybe why they cut it. It was their rate of decent that caused the secondary bounce. RIP all involved.

  • lot more lives would be lost if it was a passenger jet

  • @heywatchme101 no shit

  • they think that the plane with the fedex sign on it MIGHT have been owned by fedex wow who woulda thought

  • My sex toys were on this flight.

    :-/

  • @Maeousie have some respect for those who lost their lives! what would you like people to write if you were on that aircraft? their families and friends might read these comments, enough said!

  • apparently on the MD-11's and DC-10's, there is a design flaw in which the aircraft will roll to one side, like in the video, after a hard impact with the runway.

  • @itachiuchiha026 yeah i think it was the back wings were too small right?

  • @XDrifter2 back wings? you mean horizontal stabilizer? actually, i dont know the exact cause of the flaw

  • @itachiuchiha026 of coarse... fox interviewed a veterand pilot and he said something about it being to small

  • @XDrifter2 hmm, that is interesting how that could have been missed when they designed the plane...

  • @itachiuchiha026 thats what i thought

  • Hw did he crash?

  • wen was this????????????????

  • rip

  • Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect. By Captain A. G. Lamplugh

    God bless all our Bothers that pass on to the great Beyond

  • Most of the comments here are really stupid. Armchair FSX pilots should leave the analysis to actual pilots who fly these machines. Also a bounce recovery on a MD-11 is a whole lot different then a cessna.

  • it bounches 3 times not 2

  • WTH was that!!!!!!!!!!??????????

  • As it was a cargo plane, maybe some heavy cargo items got loose and the CG was seriously affected.

  • I am puzzled but this as well. I wonder if they hit a down draft or wind sheer or may maybe an unusually strong gust at the last minute at their current AoA or could they have entered the wrong landing weight on the MCDU causing the aircraft to touch down harder then expected? My condolences to the families.

  • R.I.P.

  • Something wrong here...Fed Ex guys don't make simple mistakes like this..

  • Gotta love the youtube experts who have more flying time in heavy aircraft than both of these pilots who were very senior.

  • What? FSX doe not count? LoL

  • Your comment is just... great, +1 for you, God bless them...

  • Condolences to the pilot and their family..

  • i do agree with u..but i think it's because of wind shear or downdraft..

  • is it a good idea to do an ils landing when there are crosswinds

  • That's a very vague statement. Unless you have a direct headwind (or even a tailwind), you are, to some extent, going to have a crosswind component. Are you suggesting that every pilot should use ILS whenever it is available?

  • I am an airline pilot working for Tarom and I can tell you that the captain was a little bit unaware of the wind shear...only an incredible quick reaction could save them

  • definitely their fault, never ever nose down in a situation like this..hands on the throttles,toga switch and execute an missed approach

  • @mirceaneacsu2004

    if you press the to/ga switch, the only purpose that would be useful for if you were taking off, that's why it's called the takeoff/go around switch! And if you were to bounce twice, pushing the throttles forward would only make the situation worse. Plus, the pilots were doing their best not to crash, nobody in their right mind would purposely push the nose down with the intention of crashing it.

  • @ie210 In an airport like Tokyo...it is impossible not to have radars installed for windshear and in this situation the airplane must be flown on approach at a little higher speed.I`ve done this situation many times in the simulator, the aircraft wouldn`t have to bounce like this.Anyway...in this case, everyday routine has marked the speed of the pilot`s reaction in a very bad direction.

  • You, are a complete faggot.

  • If you had ever flown an aircraft in wind shear you would understand that it wasnt completely the pilot's fault, and that the pilots died.

    You selfish inconsiderate twat

  • +100000!

  • why didn't they flare?

  • 3 bounces... not 2

  • My package was on this flight : (

  • Idiot.

  • your insult has ruined my day you have such power with words

  • Good on you, geezer.

  • Comment removed

  • Damn, Air france, Fedex, Turkish, Colgan, and US Airways. It must be a sign

  • it looks like it was hit by a down draft

  • thats fedex for ya.

  • As dumb as you are, how is it possible your brain keeps your heart beating?

  • Typical idiot demoncrat. You love tax and spend and $3.7 trillion deficits don't you. Did your mother have any kids that lived? What a fucktard!

  • Only a redumblican would piss on the graves of two pilots to support their own agenda. Obviously your brother and sister did have a kid that lived because you are living proof. By the way asshole...who created this disaster of a deficit?? Bush!!! Along with the over 4200 GI's he killed for his agenda. Now go give the computer back to your daddy so that adults can have real conversations about the tragic events of the video and not your lack of brain cells.

  • pklute you must sniff before you flush. Bush didn't create a budget that is $3.7 trillion beyond what we can afford. Compare the budgets shit for brains. Obama's first budget runs a deficit of 4 times the entire deficit created by Bush. You Obama sheep are absolute fucktards looking for a cause. Go save a fucking polar bear you dip shit.

  • @milehigh587

    will you people SHUT UP! who cares! This is a sad video about 2 innocent people losing their lives and you and pklute63 decide to talk about nonsense called politics debating over something that has nothing to do with this crash! How insensitive! It's like taking about terrorists at a funeral.

  • horrible...

  • after you become an officer then you get to go to flight school assuming you pass the flight aptitude test and flight medical screening. so yea im sure everyone can do the math. You will be about 27 28 before you even make it to active flight status. God bless this crew whether or not it was there fault and bless there families.

  • God bless you trooper1822

  • But like I said those are my personal opinions. Let the investigation show the cause. And not to bash anybody but i highly doubt at 23 you can be a navy pilot. I may be a Sgt in the army but i know people in the navy and that to become a naval aviator you must be between 19-26 to even be considered to become a pilot. Then factor in time to get your degree (about 4 years) to even be an officer.

  • If anything it kinda looks like the pilots may have touched down way to hard and tried to do a go around. Maybe when they touched the plane was damaged or they tried to go to go around power but it takes time for those engines to spool up.

  • So many arm chair pilots out there. This accident could have been cause by a number of factors, wrong flap settings, engine issues, sudden change in wind to name a few. The closest I have come to flying a commercial jet is flight sim so i dont try and pretend I know everything about jets but i do hold a private pilots license and have a few hours under my belt and have flown in some challenging weather.

  • agreed with CRFRidaFaLife...I'm a navy pilot, this wasnt wind shear, at least not directly, the pilot made a pilot error, you cant porpois an a/c and then try and dump the nose to recover or you will have a mishap

  • very sad r.i.p. to all thoses who lost there lifes

  • The direction of the smoke was in the opposite way it landed, look closely. So they landed with the wind. It looked like there may have been a cross wind as well. Windshear may have played a role, but it also looks like the pilot may just had not had enough experience with winds like that. Also it looks like a classic porpoised, so he should have attempted a go around.

  • this is the 8th plane crash this year. theres two many going down!!!!!!!!!!

  • yea i was studing to be a pilot but i stopped now after all of these crashes

  • pussy.

  • damn! no wonder my package is taking so long to get here! hahaha

  • you jackass's..go back and watch barney since your too uneducated to speak from any area of expertise on aviation dousche bag

  • Just saw this on tv..........it seems to land way too fast..........I wonder if it accidently landed WITH the wind instead of into it. Apparently the wind was very strong.

  • you can tell it didnt because of the direction of the smoke after i crashes...

  • The Air Traffic Controllers pick which runways are in use based upon the winds.....so they would have been landing into the wind....Wind shear?

  • Possibly...........hard to believe the ATC's would have made a mistake like that...........windshear is the obvious culprit..........that, and some pilots have complained that the MD-11 is hard to control in high winds.........one said it was like "balancing on a basket ball".

  • Yeah. And now we have seen how it looks like. Wind shear the most probable reason to justify this incident.

    Sad that people have lost their lives in just seconds. We sympathise with the aggrieved families.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more