Comparing Rolex to Invicta is like comparing Phil Collins to Justin Bieber. You are comparing sterling quality to dog feces. Invicta produces garbage for trailer trash - do a Google search on 'Invicta quality issues' and you will see what I mean. Want a good watch? Get a Seiko, Citizen, or Nautec NoLimit.
i have a rolex sub for 20 years but service on it has been expensive 800 dollars first time 450 second time. but here is the deal when i bought the rolex from jewer in 1986 it cost 1400 dollars now have had this watch for along time and it it worth way more then twice what i payed for it used
Good try, but that the Submariner is fake. Crown guards are wrong, the dial is also the wrong color. It is very hard to see any more details because of the poor camera work and lighting. But if you want to see what that watch is supposed to look like, search 16613 two tone.
You know whats funny is that invicta costs more than that fake rolex. If you think that sub is actually real well thats understandable since you can barely see it. Look at his other videos you can tell immediately just from the fake hologram on the back of the watch and his fake 2 tone gmt master ii which has the wrong bezel on it lmao. This guy just buys a real used box for 60$ and the gets a 300$ fake watch. Why do you think his rolexs have no paperwork.
You know whats funny is that invicta costs more than that fake rolex. If you think that sub is actually real well thats understandable since you can barely see it. Look at his other videos you can tell immediately just from the fake hologram on the back of the watch and his fake 2 tone gmt master ii which has the wrong bezel on it lmao. This guy just buys a real used box for 60$ and the gets a 300$ fake watch. Why do you think his rolexs have no paperwork.
Invicta 8926 It is a everyday use watch, and also the Rolex Submariner, both are made for diving experience. The gold in the rolex it's just for the person how like to say "Oh, look at me, I own a Rolex" or for the ones that like collecting watches.
WOW. I can never understand the animosity between low end watch fans and high end watch fans. It's not like I'm rich and I own a 7000.00 + Breitling. I saved for it because in every single way from quality to history it was worth it in my eyes. I don't judge people for buying a Kia over a Bentley, they both get you from point "A" to point "B" ya there is a massive price difference between the two, there is a reason for that for the folks who are willing to do there homework. For the genuine pe
There is nothing wrong with Invicta. You can buy almost 3 of them for the price of a basic Rolex service lol... I own Rolex watches and I am honestly sick of their crap and all the service they need. I have Seiko 5's that never have been touched more than 20 years and are still accurate +2 per day! If you are rich, get a Rolex but only if you have so much money its like nothing. Otherwise, get the invicta and donate the remaining 6 grand to charity :P
The rolex is sick my bro had a nice one all gold with 8 diamonds but any one that spends 5 g's on a watch is a fuckn moron either mommy or daddy bought it for u or ya have to slang crack to buy one. Anyone that says a invicta is a piece of shit makes me think your a fuckn retard. I have a invicta 0572 i got for 50$ brandnew in the box and i love it. They gotta b good if anyone takes the time to compare them with rolexs lol.
Invicta vs. Rolex... What kind of comparison can be made between a $3+k watch versus a $100 dollar watch? They both have 3 hands? They're both made out of steel? They both tell time?
After that the comparisons come to an end... Not fair to Invicta. Not fair to the Rolex either... It's like comparing a Celica to a Carrera.
I noticed he didn't compare the Rolex to the Panerai.
Which beggars the question; if you can afford Rolex and Panerai why would you even wear a cheap Mitoya movement?
@BigBlue0002 You know Panerai WAS Rolex back in the day. They had Rolex movements in them ! I have a Rolex gmt II pepsi and I also have a Invicta pepsi . I like the blue on the dial of the Invicta so I wear it a lot actually.. lol.. kinda odd maybe , but thats just me bro. I dont like the feeling wearing Rolex anymore. People dont respect you. They envy you in a bad way or just think " rich idiot". Rolex feels very in your face.
@SAINTpio91006 "Rolex GMT II Pepsi"...sweet watch. Your Pro Diver gets more "wrist time"? Not odd.. I own an Omega PO AND an few Subaquas. And, truth be told, the Invictas get more wrist-time than my Planet Ocean. I wear the Omega sparingly. In no way do I consider any of my SAN's "beaters". And they definitely get more attention and inquiry. Oversized and unconventional; they get attention.
Jealousy and envy? Not my problem; I wear what I feel. But, I do understand the issue of "preception".
Everyone has their driving lanes..I'm rolling in the Invicta lane, good watch for the money wouldn't buy a Rolex for one cause I can't afford it and two if I some how got one everyone would think it was fake anyway.. if you have a Rolex more power to you..it's a great watch.
i have the invicta and i love mine i have had it for a over year 1 1/2 with no problems its really good but your right you need to where it everyday but my next best watch is the citizen solar power i have that for over 10 years and i used it for diving as well
I tend to like watches with more character, for instance Chronoswiss and Jaeger Lecoultre. I think the classical rolex style 'diving' watch is a bit boring in comparison.
I used to own a Rolex SS/Gold Oyster Datejust and it was a nice watch but always lost time..I now have several Invictas including the 43MM ProDiver with Swiss movement and it is an excellentt watch, keeps great time and looks great,,I am always being asked if it is a Rolex and people are surprised at how nice the Invicta is for such a great price..Rolex charges and extra couple of grand for the little crown on the face..Worth it? I think not..
Well sure the invicta's are a great watch but you get the same feel or quality as you do with a rolex, no way in hell! Sure with rolex's you have to keep them maintained but shit they last a life time, unlike the invicta but for the price of the rolex service you can just go buy another invicta. Me i like to treat myself to high quality shit when i can especial since i love watches!
@sachakishlar - at roughly $325, the Swiss Made Pro divers are solid as a rock and feel at least as substanital as a Rolex Sub. It costs more to get a Rolex cleaned than it costs to buy a new Swiss Made Pro Diver. The biggest difference between the 2 is that Rolex spends like $90 million per year on advertising in the US alone. Much of Rolex is the perceived value coming from the name recognition / advertising.
@snipeyoass420 “Oh, Thank you.. I'm so glad you corrected me..People are always so glad when someone corrects them... I was referring to the looks of the watch not so much the workings..but The older Rolex automatics did not really keep very good time..even at $2500 back in 1984 when I acquired my first...everyome has their priorities and right now a Rolex is not one of mine,,hope you enjoy yours..
@cocoalump A rolex and an Invicta are nowhere near the same for many reasons:
1. Screw down crown
2. True water resistance(screw down crown)
3. Solid band links (depends on the Invicta I suppose)
4. Solid end links
Now would I buy a Rolex? No. But I also wouldn't buy an invicta auto, because they're too hit or miss. If you're looking for a good Submariner style watch that's affordable, check out Orient's watches, especially the Ray. Great watch with in house mov't, mine's +4s/day.
@CasualX3 Well, if you knew anything about anything, I'd take your advice, however, I'm not fat or broke, and since you sound like a little bitch------- FUCK YOU. My Invictas kick ass
ShopNBC.com is the best place to buy these watches. I just bought this one: Invicta Reserve Men's Pro Diver Swiss Automatic 18K Gold Plated Bracelet Watch
First off, who cares? To each their own when it comes to watches. I personaly own a few expensive Swiss watches and a few Japenese lower end watches. When it comes to people comparing Rolex vs Invicta this point is moot. Its like comparing a Model T to a Reventon. They are on two completely different playing fields.
Invicta watches are very good watches for the working man that likes nice watches. I have an Invicta 2688 Abyss with deep blue bezel and blue MOP dial. It's not a Rolex Submariner but HUGE value for the money. It is TRUELY water resistant to deep levels too.
invicta time is more acurate compared to rolex .. two diferente watches ..thas it .i own 7 invictas i have a friend that has 3 rolex i get more atention with my invictas thans him with he's rolex's he gets so mad .. i rahter have invictas than rolex no doubt !!!
I used to think Rolex watches were hugely overpriced until I read an in depth article about how they are made and all the research that goes into making the various components. The company obviously is highly meticulous about what they make and how. I no longer believe them to be over priced.
@beecnul8r - yeah i like the tech-engineering going into Rolex. but i don't get all the harrumph re these watches. i don't like that it is so difficult to tell a "fake vs real." to tell the difference, it is recommended to take it to a jeweler, watchmaker. if it is that extreme, why bother! i want it to be obvious! the invicta makes a great watch. the only meaningful difference is that the invicta says i am not a $5k watch. whereas the real-fake rolex says maybe expensive.
The difference is is that rolex is made with different materials and is highly over priced, and invicta is made with cheaper materials but is sold at a good price, they are both cool and if I had the money I would not get a shitty rolex I would rather get an Omega, those are tight watches. But a watch is a watch.
I would NEVER say that a Rolex is not a good watch. We all know Rolex is good. I will say however, that what you get for what you pay is WAY over priced! WAY OVER PRICED. If you pay 5000 for a rolex, you must realize you spent thousands for a name, not so much for quality. I'm not saying the Rolex movt is not quality, but you can get a watch that is just as good in terms of quality and will last just as long for thousands less than you pay for a Rolex. People buy Rolex for the name. Thats it.
I agree but not just the name, but also the beautiful crafted movt. It really depends on the person, if they like precise time or just awesome crafted movts then they will pay the price. but if you just want good quality for the money then sure go get an invicta. Me i keep any rolex for years and years. But i always buy them used never new as i save myself a lot of money for the same thing.
People buy clothes and shoes for the name too.Its all about the feeling you get man.You feel rich and strong when you wear Rolex thats it.If you can afford it you will buy it.If not then you wear Invicta.But when you feel better?When you wear Invicta or when you wear Rolex? I choose Rolex.
I wear Invicta because it means undefeated and it is good quality formoney andtells the time so I feel mentally stronger because I do not need a Rolex to feel strong when I am INVICTA...plus Federer wearsRolex
I agree with sach, Ford came before BMW, the single action Colt peacemaker came before Glock. Again...your point being? Are you saying that if it was developed first it is the best and can't be out done?
BTW, I have the Invicta 9937 w/ Swiss Movement. If I could afford the Rolex I would, but $5000 can buy a lot of other nice watches and women to go with them.
yeah dude, 5,000? If I had that money just to spend on watches, I'd by an ASSLOAD of Invictas. Invictas are nice to me I don't care what no one says. That Sub Aqua Noma 1-4 is beast. I pretty much like everything by them even the Lupah, I'd wear the lupah's to the pool.
There's no comparison Rolex is overpriced having to pay thousands of dollars for a equal watch to the Invicta Pro Diver under $200 & the invicta is larger & looks better.
you really don't know shit do you! the invicta and the sub are both divers watches, there both 40mm, and they look very fucking similar regarding the fact that invicta was sued by rolex in 2004. no shit their is a price difference and the movt can not be compared but seriously who gives a fuck what you think you've got nothing to prove but a fucking daddy cock sucker you are, ur such a waste of sperm.
No ass rim licker the Invicta pro diver is offered in many different ways other than your feable experience. I have a 43mm on the way and have sold my 40mm for more than I paid for it. Try that with Rolex. Typical used Rolex are discount over 50% in the resale market ass whipe! Who cares if they were sued... Obviously Invicta has gone on to sell more watches by volume at a lower price decreasing rolex's market share....Yeah I do know more than your no dick ass. cunt cheese!
your pathetic! ok so what i was talking about my specific pro diver which is 40mm not all pro divers in general. you can re-sale rolex's higher then you buy them for as i have done so many times! obviously you can't even get near an amazing swiss crafted watch so why bother. invicta's for the money are a great buy but are not at all my thing. wait until you feel good about buying a real time piece!
i'm talking about my rolex's! i bet you post BS comments on everyones watch related videos just to entertain yourself, seriously go buy a real time piece and stop buying pathetic wanna be rolex invictas!
Invicta has done an amazing job with this watch for the price but they are certainly not equal. If you held them both in your hand you would know which is the real deal. The difference is much like riding in a Toyota vs a Benz., Sure they both do the same thing but the sounds, feel and function of the two and different. The extra price is worth it to some, not to others, it depends on your circumstances in life I suppose
Personally I think ROLEX is over priced, I have owned longines, Zenith, Bretling, Poljot and god knows how many OMEGAs. I just can't see paying twice as much for watch just because of the ROLEX name. Not to mention their style hasn't changed in 30 years
i can see your point, but you paid the price of a rolex if you've had breitling. i used to own an aerospace but i sold it because it just wasn't a watch that i was attracted to. I love rolex and i get them pre owned i never buy them new cause their 3x's more. For example on my submariner here, that retails new at $9k i saved $4k and bought it for only $5k. you can find great deals on them if you really look around and i've been using the same jeweler ever since. Next up is a day date!
I totally agree with you ithicaplasma... To me; Rolex watches are not esthetically pleasing... The only Rolex that I would actually buy, is the Daytona, but not the IMO garbage that they have out now, but the original Rolex TT Daytona with the superior Zenith Movement Ref. 16523.
i can understand that, but sure the invicta is a great watch, lasts a long time for a miota movement, very strong, but not as comfortable to wear as the rolex obviously. But over all for the money the invicta is the best brand out there in that category.
quartz are the worst movt ever, their the opposite of precision. my breitling aerospace is quartz but the swiss do make very efficient and decent quartz movts.
ok, well james bond used to wear the submariner back when sean conery was in, but every since it has been the omega speedmaster.
well ok i mean i use my submariner and my panerai luminor daily and their great! but in your case since you want to not care about beating it up, don't get a rolex. you can also get the invicta pro diver which is what i use, it is available in the swiss movt for around $250. which will give you a pretty good accurate time, not as precise as the rolex but precise
the rolex obviously is the most accurate one, but the invicta will still tell you the time but maybe off by a few sec since its not a swiss movt and is not as precise! i mean were you looking to buy one?
I like the Rolex Submariner style because of the clean look and James Bond factor but can't justify/afford the price currently. I'm looking to find a homage piece that's more affordable and of good quality. Something I can wear freely and not be afraid to beat up & put up to daily abuse. I'm looking at the various brands that make models with similar style of the Submariner. Thanks.
Get a G-Shock and be done with it.
Kalgoorlie10 1 week ago
Comparing Rolex to Invicta is like comparing Phil Collins to Justin Bieber. You are comparing sterling quality to dog feces. Invicta produces garbage for trailer trash - do a Google search on 'Invicta quality issues' and you will see what I mean. Want a good watch? Get a Seiko, Citizen, or Nautec NoLimit.
RebelKnightCSA 2 months ago
You spelt Enjoy wrong you illiterate fuck
warlord144 3 months ago
i have a rolex sub for 20 years but service on it has been expensive 800 dollars first time 450 second time. but here is the deal when i bought the rolex from jewer in 1986 it cost 1400 dollars now have had this watch for along time and it it worth way more then twice what i payed for it used
brenter55 3 months ago
Good try, but that the Submariner is fake. Crown guards are wrong, the dial is also the wrong color. It is very hard to see any more details because of the poor camera work and lighting. But if you want to see what that watch is supposed to look like, search 16613 two tone.
keykeybongo 4 months ago
INVICTA is better than rolex
DmitryNikon 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You know whats funny is that invicta costs more than that fake rolex. If you think that sub is actually real well thats understandable since you can barely see it. Look at his other videos you can tell immediately just from the fake hologram on the back of the watch and his fake 2 tone gmt master ii which has the wrong bezel on it lmao. This guy just buys a real used box for 60$ and the gets a 300$ fake watch. Why do you think his rolexs have no paperwork.
snipeyoass420 5 months ago
You know whats funny is that invicta costs more than that fake rolex. If you think that sub is actually real well thats understandable since you can barely see it. Look at his other videos you can tell immediately just from the fake hologram on the back of the watch and his fake 2 tone gmt master ii which has the wrong bezel on it lmao. This guy just buys a real used box for 60$ and the gets a 300$ fake watch. Why do you think his rolexs have no paperwork.
snipeyoass420 5 months ago
extremely poor lightly
wrxhirner 5 months ago
Invicta 8926 It is a everyday use watch, and also the Rolex Submariner, both are made for diving experience. The gold in the rolex it's just for the person how like to say "Oh, look at me, I own a Rolex" or for the ones that like collecting watches.
This is just my opinion!
jocsandoval 6 months ago
This Invicta is $84 on Amazon now..
OrangePHX 6 months ago
The Sub with gold a 16613.....not a 16610
woody1pc 6 months ago
WOW. I can never understand the animosity between low end watch fans and high end watch fans. It's not like I'm rich and I own a 7000.00 + Breitling. I saved for it because in every single way from quality to history it was worth it in my eyes. I don't judge people for buying a Kia over a Bentley, they both get you from point "A" to point "B" ya there is a massive price difference between the two, there is a reason for that for the folks who are willing to do there homework. For the genuine pe
TheSwissVictorinox 7 months ago
There is nothing wrong with Invicta. You can buy almost 3 of them for the price of a basic Rolex service lol... I own Rolex watches and I am honestly sick of their crap and all the service they need. I have Seiko 5's that never have been touched more than 20 years and are still accurate +2 per day! If you are rich, get a Rolex but only if you have so much money its like nothing. Otherwise, get the invicta and donate the remaining 6 grand to charity :P
SAINTpio91006 8 months ago
Ps. Im not a hater of blowova i mean bulova but i would rather have a invicta for the price anyday.
jeffomalley100 8 months ago
The rolex is sick my bro had a nice one all gold with 8 diamonds but any one that spends 5 g's on a watch is a fuckn moron either mommy or daddy bought it for u or ya have to slang crack to buy one. Anyone that says a invicta is a piece of shit makes me think your a fuckn retard. I have a invicta 0572 i got for 50$ brandnew in the box and i love it. They gotta b good if anyone takes the time to compare them with rolexs lol.
jeffomalley100 8 months ago
bullshit with your rolx,and thats not a diver extention
ndragos87 9 months ago
Two words Bulova Precisionist!
swiss86watches 10 months ago
The Rolex Is Resemblent To The Invicta 8928OB Pro Diver The Same Bezel Dial And Bracelet Color As The Two Tone 18K Gold Rolex.
Lucas96136 11 months ago
Invicta vs. Rolex... What kind of comparison can be made between a $3+k watch versus a $100 dollar watch? They both have 3 hands? They're both made out of steel? They both tell time?
After that the comparisons come to an end... Not fair to Invicta. Not fair to the Rolex either... It's like comparing a Celica to a Carrera.
I noticed he didn't compare the Rolex to the Panerai.
Which beggars the question; if you can afford Rolex and Panerai why would you even wear a cheap Mitoya movement?
BigBlue0002 1 year ago
@BigBlue0002 You know Panerai WAS Rolex back in the day. They had Rolex movements in them ! I have a Rolex gmt II pepsi and I also have a Invicta pepsi . I like the blue on the dial of the Invicta so I wear it a lot actually.. lol.. kinda odd maybe , but thats just me bro. I dont like the feeling wearing Rolex anymore. People dont respect you. They envy you in a bad way or just think " rich idiot". Rolex feels very in your face.
SAINTpio91006 8 months ago
@SAINTpio91006 "Rolex GMT II Pepsi"...sweet watch. Your Pro Diver gets more "wrist time"? Not odd.. I own an Omega PO AND an few Subaquas. And, truth be told, the Invictas get more wrist-time than my Planet Ocean. I wear the Omega sparingly. In no way do I consider any of my SAN's "beaters". And they definitely get more attention and inquiry. Oversized and unconventional; they get attention.
Jealousy and envy? Not my problem; I wear what I feel. But, I do understand the issue of "preception".
BigBlue0002 8 months ago
Everyone has their driving lanes..I'm rolling in the Invicta lane, good watch for the money wouldn't buy a Rolex for one cause I can't afford it and two if I some how got one everyone would think it was fake anyway.. if you have a Rolex more power to you..it's a great watch.
sweetjones30 1 year ago
i have the invicta and i love mine i have had it for a over year 1 1/2 with no problems its really good but your right you need to where it everyday but my next best watch is the citizen solar power i have that for over 10 years and i used it for diving as well
scottso241 1 year ago
I tend to like watches with more character, for instance Chronoswiss and Jaeger Lecoultre. I think the classical rolex style 'diving' watch is a bit boring in comparison.
bluewiz20films 1 year ago
Comment removed
bluewiz20films 1 year ago
Invictas are ugly theres nothing nice looking about them. They just look like every other watch
Metalhead6520 1 year ago
I like Omega more than Rolex in terms of design.
SacreDro 1 year ago
Btw Invicta does make a submariner style watch with Swiss movement and a sapphire face. Check out the 9937OB.
tehooper 1 year ago 2
I used to own a Rolex SS/Gold Oyster Datejust and it was a nice watch but always lost time..I now have several Invictas including the 43MM ProDiver with Swiss movement and it is an excellentt watch, keeps great time and looks great,,I am always being asked if it is a Rolex and people are surprised at how nice the Invicta is for such a great price..Rolex charges and extra couple of grand for the little crown on the face..Worth it? I think not..
cocoalump 1 year ago 5
Well sure the invicta's are a great watch but you get the same feel or quality as you do with a rolex, no way in hell! Sure with rolex's you have to keep them maintained but shit they last a life time, unlike the invicta but for the price of the rolex service you can just go buy another invicta. Me i like to treat myself to high quality shit when i can especial since i love watches!
sachakishlar 1 year ago
@sachakishlar - at roughly $325, the Swiss Made Pro divers are solid as a rock and feel at least as substanital as a Rolex Sub. It costs more to get a Rolex cleaned than it costs to buy a new Swiss Made Pro Diver. The biggest difference between the 2 is that Rolex spends like $90 million per year on advertising in the US alone. Much of Rolex is the perceived value coming from the name recognition / advertising.
Republinator 1 year ago
@sachakishlar my grand dad's rolex just broke.. 30 g gone... so we got him an invicta
jay5566f4 1 month ago
@jay5566f4 stupid comment, when the brakes go out on your car you dont buy another car...
MrArd92 1 week ago
@cocoalump I AGREE !!
mraissam1997 1 year ago
@cocoalump Honestly you think the crown is the only difference?! Have you lost your fucking marbells!
snipeyoass420 5 months ago
@snipeyoass420 “Oh, Thank you.. I'm so glad you corrected me..People are always so glad when someone corrects them... I was referring to the looks of the watch not so much the workings..but The older Rolex automatics did not really keep very good time..even at $2500 back in 1984 when I acquired my first...everyome has their priorities and right now a Rolex is not one of mine,,hope you enjoy yours..
cocoalump 5 months ago 3
I have that watch but with the grey face and red second hand so it copies the 16610 and the Yachtmaster at the same time lmao
snipeyoass420 5 months ago
@cocoalump you switched a ROLEX for an INVICTA!?
NoahSchultzChannel 4 months ago
@cocoalump A rolex and an Invicta are nowhere near the same for many reasons:
1. Screw down crown
2. True water resistance(screw down crown)
3. Solid band links (depends on the Invicta I suppose)
4. Solid end links
Now would I buy a Rolex? No. But I also wouldn't buy an invicta auto, because they're too hit or miss. If you're looking for a good Submariner style watch that's affordable, check out Orient's watches, especially the Ray. Great watch with in house mov't, mine's +4s/day.
tacoeatingmonkey 1 week ago
@tacoeatingmonkey maybe you did not notice that my comment was left over 1 year ago..thnks for the reply but it doesnt matter now
cocoalump 1 week ago
haha did you just say Luminox i have that if not well Luminous heh.
Dante2008Allen 1 year ago
Fuck Invicta...Invicta is for fat broke people
ROLEX ALL THE WAY
I earned my rolex son, Invicta sucks ass and their warranty sucks!!
CasualX3 1 year ago
@CasualX3 no you tried to hard they are great watches.
soulcalibur22 1 year ago
@CasualX3 Well, if you knew anything about anything, I'd take your advice, however, I'm not fat or broke, and since you sound like a little bitch------- FUCK YOU. My Invictas kick ass
broearth1 5 months ago
ShopNBC.com is the best place to buy these watches. I just bought this one: Invicta Reserve Men's Pro Diver Swiss Automatic 18K Gold Plated Bracelet Watch
daehkcarc 1 year ago
First off, who cares? To each their own when it comes to watches. I personaly own a few expensive Swiss watches and a few Japenese lower end watches. When it comes to people comparing Rolex vs Invicta this point is moot. Its like comparing a Model T to a Reventon. They are on two completely different playing fields.
GLIveeDUB 1 year ago
Invicta watches are very good watches for the working man that likes nice watches. I have an Invicta 2688 Abyss with deep blue bezel and blue MOP dial. It's not a Rolex Submariner but HUGE value for the money. It is TRUELY water resistant to deep levels too.
brianl890 1 year ago
Looks great, Where did you get that two toned bracelet for the Invicta?
Is that the 8926?
Is it hard to get extensions for the bracelets? I have thick wrists.
Forgoten214 1 year ago
Hey, this pro diver comes like this none are not polished all are two tuned i bought it off amazon.com for $105 real good deal. hope this helps
sachakishlar 1 year ago 2
@sachakishlar
Oh I see, I thought you said you changed the bracelet.
Thanks for the response. =)
Forgoten214 1 year ago
@sachakishlar hey may i know if invicta is a good watch brand? and may i know how to wind the invicta ?
donhealyou 10 months ago
y wont he show the invicta back to show the auto movement .. lol. maybe because the invict is so much more good looking . lol !!!
KEVULINO 1 year ago
Comment removed
KEVULINO 1 year ago
invicta time is more acurate compared to rolex .. two diferente watches ..thas it .i own 7 invictas i have a friend that has 3 rolex i get more atention with my invictas thans him with he's rolex's he gets so mad .. i rahter have invictas than rolex no doubt !!!
KEVULINO 1 year ago
I used to think Rolex watches were hugely overpriced until I read an in depth article about how they are made and all the research that goes into making the various components. The company obviously is highly meticulous about what they make and how. I no longer believe them to be over priced.
beecnul8r 1 year ago
@beecnul8r - yeah i like the tech-engineering going into Rolex. but i don't get all the harrumph re these watches. i don't like that it is so difficult to tell a "fake vs real." to tell the difference, it is recommended to take it to a jeweler, watchmaker. if it is that extreme, why bother! i want it to be obvious! the invicta makes a great watch. the only meaningful difference is that the invicta says i am not a $5k watch. whereas the real-fake rolex says maybe expensive.
qncsc 6 months ago
The difference is is that rolex is made with different materials and is highly over priced, and invicta is made with cheaper materials but is sold at a good price, they are both cool and if I had the money I would not get a shitty rolex I would rather get an Omega, those are tight watches. But a watch is a watch.
SoggyNachos69 1 year ago
Lets not forget that the submariner was itself a copy of the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms a watch that preceeded the Submariner to market.
PUREAAMERICAN 1 year ago
Do you know anything about the Swiss Legend watches? Specifically the Commander two tone stainless steel with the red dial?
jdog1616 2 years ago
Rolex best
2011shark 2 years ago
i love all the broken english comments
jjaycuny 2 years ago
i love rolex but when it comes down to price and quality of watches i go with invicta.
braindawgs9 2 years ago
I have that invicta watch.
toontownlegomaster 2 years ago
I would NEVER say that a Rolex is not a good watch. We all know Rolex is good. I will say however, that what you get for what you pay is WAY over priced! WAY OVER PRICED. If you pay 5000 for a rolex, you must realize you spent thousands for a name, not so much for quality. I'm not saying the Rolex movt is not quality, but you can get a watch that is just as good in terms of quality and will last just as long for thousands less than you pay for a Rolex. People buy Rolex for the name. Thats it.
k0d0kan 2 years ago
I agree but not just the name, but also the beautiful crafted movt. It really depends on the person, if they like precise time or just awesome crafted movts then they will pay the price. but if you just want good quality for the money then sure go get an invicta. Me i keep any rolex for years and years. But i always buy them used never new as i save myself a lot of money for the same thing.
sachakishlar 2 years ago
People buy clothes and shoes for the name too.Its all about the feeling you get man.You feel rich and strong when you wear Rolex thats it.If you can afford it you will buy it.If not then you wear Invicta.But when you feel better?When you wear Invicta or when you wear Rolex? I choose Rolex.
xNoobFromHell 2 years ago
I wear Invicta because it means undefeated and it is good quality formoney andtells the time so I feel mentally stronger because I do not need a Rolex to feel strong when I am INVICTA...plus Federer wearsRolex
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
most ppl dont even realise rolex came after timex and invicta and was started in london ... swiss timepiece my arse
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
it is true that they started before rolex. but your point being?
sachakishlar 2 years ago
my point being most ppl dont even realise rolex came after timex and invicta and was started in london ..what part are you struggling with?
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
nothing i agree with you but ppl buy what they want these days whether they can or not afford it you know.
sachakishlar 2 years ago
I agree with sach, Ford came before BMW, the single action Colt peacemaker came before Glock. Again...your point being? Are you saying that if it was developed first it is the best and can't be out done?
BTW, I have the Invicta 9937 w/ Swiss Movement. If I could afford the Rolex I would, but $5000 can buy a lot of other nice watches and women to go with them.
SouthernKudzu 2 years ago 11
yes exactly but i agree with u that to in the warranty they should include free bikini ladies to come along with you lol
sachakishlar 2 years ago 2
@SouthernKudzu hahahaha you buy women???
E-Z on the hookers
CasualX3 1 year ago
@SouthernKudzu AGREED :D especially the women part... :D
mraissam1997 1 year ago
@SouthernKudzu
yeah dude, 5,000? If I had that money just to spend on watches, I'd by an ASSLOAD of Invictas. Invictas are nice to me I don't care what no one says. That Sub Aqua Noma 1-4 is beast. I pretty much like everything by them even the Lupah, I'd wear the lupah's to the pool.
kpgangsta1992 9 months ago
@SouthernKudzu That's why real Rolex collectors have many $5000s to spare, they use it on Rolex-es and other nice watches and women.
I'm sorry you only have a $5000 and have to choose between the 2.
MrRallen81 4 months ago
There's no comparison Rolex is overpriced having to pay thousands of dollars for a equal watch to the Invicta Pro Diver under $200 & the invicta is larger & looks better.
bigtool2321 2 years ago
you really don't know shit do you! the invicta and the sub are both divers watches, there both 40mm, and they look very fucking similar regarding the fact that invicta was sued by rolex in 2004. no shit their is a price difference and the movt can not be compared but seriously who gives a fuck what you think you've got nothing to prove but a fucking daddy cock sucker you are, ur such a waste of sperm.
sachakishlar 2 years ago
No ass rim licker the Invicta pro diver is offered in many different ways other than your feable experience. I have a 43mm on the way and have sold my 40mm for more than I paid for it. Try that with Rolex. Typical used Rolex are discount over 50% in the resale market ass whipe! Who cares if they were sued... Obviously Invicta has gone on to sell more watches by volume at a lower price decreasing rolex's market share....Yeah I do know more than your no dick ass. cunt cheese!
bigtool2321 2 years ago
your pathetic! ok so what i was talking about my specific pro diver which is 40mm not all pro divers in general. you can re-sale rolex's higher then you buy them for as i have done so many times! obviously you can't even get near an amazing swiss crafted watch so why bother. invicta's for the money are a great buy but are not at all my thing. wait until you feel good about buying a real time piece!
sachakishlar 2 years ago
You talking about your fake piece of crap or the real that looks like a fake? hmmmm
bigtool2321 2 years ago
i'm talking about my rolex's! i bet you post BS comments on everyones watch related videos just to entertain yourself, seriously go buy a real time piece and stop buying pathetic wanna be rolex invictas!
sachakishlar 2 years ago
Invicta has done an amazing job with this watch for the price but they are certainly not equal. If you held them both in your hand you would know which is the real deal. The difference is much like riding in a Toyota vs a Benz., Sure they both do the same thing but the sounds, feel and function of the two and different. The extra price is worth it to some, not to others, it depends on your circumstances in life I suppose
ithicaplasma 2 years ago
ha-ha, "as where this is a piece of shit compared to rolex". That really sums it up
1NTERGALACTIC 2 years ago
Personally I think ROLEX is over priced, I have owned longines, Zenith, Bretling, Poljot and god knows how many OMEGAs. I just can't see paying twice as much for watch just because of the ROLEX name. Not to mention their style hasn't changed in 30 years
ithicaplasma 2 years ago
i can see your point, but you paid the price of a rolex if you've had breitling. i used to own an aerospace but i sold it because it just wasn't a watch that i was attracted to. I love rolex and i get them pre owned i never buy them new cause their 3x's more. For example on my submariner here, that retails new at $9k i saved $4k and bought it for only $5k. you can find great deals on them if you really look around and i've been using the same jeweler ever since. Next up is a day date!
sachakishlar 2 years ago
I totally agree with you ithicaplasma... To me; Rolex watches are not esthetically pleasing... The only Rolex that I would actually buy, is the Daytona, but not the IMO garbage that they have out now, but the original Rolex TT Daytona with the superior Zenith Movement Ref. 16523.
PatientZeroThree 2 years ago
For the money and everyday use, I'll take the Invicta. Rolex is great but not everyone can afford to spend 5 grand on a watch. I wish I could though!
charger19691 2 years ago
i can understand that, but sure the invicta is a great watch, lasts a long time for a miota movement, very strong, but not as comfortable to wear as the rolex obviously. But over all for the money the invicta is the best brand out there in that category.
sachakishlar 2 years ago
its kinda sad cause my dad lost his 18k gold rolex... i loved that watch. now he uses a invicta. i use a casio g shock.
wheely132 2 years ago
904 steel not 940
cornerstone228 2 years ago
i wonder if the rolex has less scratches not just because of its composition, but also by the amount of care you've given it.
OrangeColita 2 years ago
amount of care?? i clean it everyday!
sachakishlar 2 years ago
If you care about precision that much, get a quartz watch. lol
TylerSpilker 2 years ago
quartz are the worst movt ever, their the opposite of precision. my breitling aerospace is quartz but the swiss do make very efficient and decent quartz movts.
sachakishlar 2 years ago
so do you get most of these online or do you buy them directly from Rolex/Invicta/ etc.
BeTaFiShRkOoL 2 years ago
i get higher end watches like the rolex sub from my friends that are jewelers, but the invicta i get from amazon because it is super cheap!
sachakishlar 2 years ago
ok, well james bond used to wear the submariner back when sean conery was in, but every since it has been the omega speedmaster.
well ok i mean i use my submariner and my panerai luminor daily and their great! but in your case since you want to not care about beating it up, don't get a rolex. you can also get the invicta pro diver which is what i use, it is available in the swiss movt for around $250. which will give you a pretty good accurate time, not as precise as the rolex but precise
sachakishlar 2 years ago
How's the accuracy between the two?
roughrider119 2 years ago
the rolex obviously is the most accurate one, but the invicta will still tell you the time but maybe off by a few sec since its not a swiss movt and is not as precise! i mean were you looking to buy one?
sachakishlar 2 years ago
I like the Rolex Submariner style because of the clean look and James Bond factor but can't justify/afford the price currently. I'm looking to find a homage piece that's more affordable and of good quality. Something I can wear freely and not be afraid to beat up & put up to daily abuse. I'm looking at the various brands that make models with similar style of the Submariner. Thanks.
roughrider119 2 years ago