But in Hinduism there are no images of God! those are images of gods-- lower case. But the one supreme Brahman is universal and imageless. Having idols doesn't mean that God is an idol. It just means that you're worshiping him through an icon, because God is in and of EVERYHING. If you say he's not, then you're limiting God. Zakir is not being logical or fair to HInduism.
But in Hinduism there are no images of God! those are images of gods-- lower case. But the one supreme Brahman is universal and imageless. Having idols doesn't mean that God is an idol. It just means that you're worshiping him through an icon, because God is in and of EVERYHING. If you say he's not, then you're limiting God. Zakir is not being logical or fair to HInduism.
asswaxer100 4 months ago