Added: 2 years ago
From: darliegoddess
Views: 1,939
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (101)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So... Why is it a good idea to have the State raising our children instead of their parents again? Do you truly understand what you are advocating here? A social worker to make sure a parent is spending enough time with their child?! Look, I agree that the family dynamic has gone down the tubes, but this is classic knee jerk reaction crap to treat symptoms of the problem. What good is there in allowing the government to tell a parent how much time is the right amount of time with their children?

  • @zoator So, how are you going to fix it ? Gay marriage was banned to defend bad marriages ? You are either going to defend marriage or not. DIVORCE HURTS FAMILIES! You think banning people from getting married is ok but banning them from getting divorced isn't ? Kind of hypocritical don't you think?

  • @teaksmama

    Exactly.

  • Even tho you're drunk. You make good points.

  • @Freemmaann

    Lol! Thanks!

  • @TomStewartKilledMe

    " Who are you, to decide my life?"

    Lol! The gays are asking you the same question.

  • that's kind of a fine line, there. I was a child who went through a divorce, because my real father beat my mother so badly there were times she could barely open her eyes ( he was a good christian man).She left before he decided to take out his anger on us.so at least this law i can't say I agree with, honestly.

  • The idea is to force the same people who ban divorce for others in their own hypocrisy. The divorce rate is higher amoung Christians..

  • Let me guess....hmmmm.... are you a political Progressive?

    I think so.

  • @Parson2

    No.

  • Should we require forced abortion, in people who get pregnant and get low SAT scores?

  • @Parson2

    You wouldn't have been born.

  • I've become very interested in all this, Darlie. I wonder if you could make a video where you discuss ideas on good parenting.

    For one, I'd think it would be a good idea to make sure that a child gets a good education, and to teach him or her to prioritize. It would be good to teach a child to finish all homework before doing anything else.

  • Also, I was thinking it would be good to raise a child without religion. It would seem to be a good idea to let a child go where the evidence leads him or her while he or she gets a good, solid education.

  • I agree there is such a double standard im the case of marrige.

  • Me too. Divorce destroys marriages.

  • As soon as I make enough, I'm getting fixed. I never want to have children.

    Yes, divorce is getting out of control. Men are typically screwed after the divorce.

  • I cant deny that. Especially in CA.

  • Hell IS real, only where I'm from, it's called Texas! XD

  • Darliegoddess, may I post your video on my facebook?

  • It's embeddable. Yup. And thank you.

  • I agree with everything Darliegoddess said! FIVE STARS!

  • I like you! You're a pretty lady!

  • Thank you whyu =)

  • I met people in undergrad and a few in grad that are still not smart enough to have children and have them anyway.

  • Regardless MoE , I think that we need at least a basic requirement because a lot of these kids are not being raised properly. We drag our personal issues onto these kids and damage them.

  • Some sort of psychiatric examination would be lovely in that case. As soon as I get out of debt, I'm getting a vasectomy. The best way not to harm the kids is by not having them in the first place.

  • While I agree I would hold off a vasectomy till you are ABSOLUTELY sure you don't want it. Or have your perm frozen in case you change your mind.

  • It is none of my business what they do in the privacy of their own homes. Whatever problems daddy has are yours to solve, not mine.You all got to vote on gay peoples relationships so now I'm going to vote on straight peoples. No divorce. It's fair right ?

  • Is this about revenge Dalie, If its none of your business, and it's not, than than stay out of the marriage altogether. Its there lives, not your, not mine.

  • Not at all. It's about truth and equality. It's about protecting marriage. Like what the CA voters did by banning gay marriages. How incredibly arrogant of you to give those homophobes a pass for breaking up families yet give those who are protecting families a hard time ! Hypocrisy is everywhere

  • Totally Agree with you 100 % ^^

    Hey maybe some people will actually start to think.. Though not likely with ringing church bells in there heads.

  • Well said. :)

  • Yeah I see the light now. Lets Ban Divorce, and then little Tommy, and Sally, will never have to worry about mommy leaving daddy for beating her, or for touching Tommy. It'll be great... Lets Do IT!!! Give me a break, I thought you were SMARTER than that Darlie. I thought you were about Choice.

  • I am about choice. Who is stopping people choosing to marry or not ? If someone beats mom they go to jail, does divorce stop the crime ? What a lame excuse for breaking up homes and subjecting kids to miserable one parent existence . You obviously don't care about traditional marriage.

  • I think Darlie Might have lost her mind...Poor Thing. I think those of us truly believe in freedom of choice need to just Fire The Government and start a new country were freedom means something. Banning Divorce, Like Same Sex Marriage Is just more foolishness on the part of the people in power.

  • Sure, tell me when your "Fire the Government " movement starts, oh wait , it has , The Teabaggers ! That's right, clueless people bussed in for free by the oil companies. Classic CIA move to get a body of stupid people to execute their own democratically elected leader set to nationalize anything. It's worked so well in other countries in the past , murder , assassination , black ops.

  • you know theres a 50% divorce rate now and they say kids can wreak a relationship but if people want to break upp let them...

  • We are protecting marriage so people never have to break up.

  • what do you mean?

  • Married people will not be able to get divorces so the families will stay together. They will make much better choices before marriage as well.

  • Your not Protecting marriage, your preventing incompatible people from taking the path in life they want or need.

  • If they were incompatible they shouldn't have married. Divorce is the destruction of marriage and the voters are TOTALLY CLEAR ! PROTECT MARRIAGE ! PROTECT CHILDREN How can christians babble on and on about "moral superiority" and be such HORRID parents and such and DISGUSTINGLY CHEATS ! This will solve everything.

  • I agree, people change, sometimes for the good, sometimes for the bad. If the kids are being hurt by a bad marriage, because mommy and daddy can't get along, or there is abuse than more power to any man or woman that wants out of it. Let the people decide for themselves.

  • Do they change ? What, become other people ? Perhaps they become themselves after pretending to be nice but they don't change. Mommy and daddy will learn to get along, it's too easy to dump people. They are selfishly thinking of themselves, not the kids.

  • well darlie you can adopt all the kids that come from broken homes.

  • I wont have to because mom and dad are staying together FOREVER !

  • Banning divorce wouldn't do much, it would simply hurt more children.

    Why not ban marriage?

    Or require all babies to be commissioned by the government?

  • Why would it hurt children ? You should see some of the films on YT where the kids get to talk about their parents divorce and how painful that is. THey are the victims so no, no more divorce. It's too easy a solution.

    We can't ban marriage, it's a Christian tradition. I'm all for licensing parents .

  • Proper Example requirements for Parents:

    Parents who watch more than 2 hours of television per day or 6 hours of "reality" TV per week will be excluded from having children. We don't need new morons to be indoctrinated.

    Parents who eat at fast food restaurants more than twice a week will be required to attend remedial Nutritional education per checklist item B. A social worker will regularly monitor the children for proper nutrition.

  • why don't we take the progressive leap into the future that Texas took and just ban marriage altogether

  • Well Texas did that because most bigots are not really educated and so they worded it wrong. What else would you expect from the Bush state.

  • i think i know what party u went too, i wanted to go but gf was too out of it.

  • This was in Burbank.

  • nvm then sorry *puts on dunce hat*

  • No dunce hats here Mel. Just hugs.

  • I get the parody in this video, its funny

    But frankly I would institute into law that if someone doesn't have a high school education then they can't have children. It would stop the ignorant from reproducing and perhaps we could eradicate the "idiot vote".

  • Exactly !

  • by banning divorce, you'd be killing marriage

  • No, you are protecting marriage and the protecting the children. They deserve a two parent home. Marriage is not a right, it's a responsability.

  • Fuck marriage. Forcing people to stay together that don't want to be together only hurts marriage. Remaining married for the children doesn't work. You can't force people into slavery just for the sake if the children.

  • Yeah, you can.

  • they can always go to a different state to get a divorce . its not a big deal

  • We would not recognize divorce so it wouldn't count =)

  • BAND DIVORCE,I AGREE

  • I don't think that would be a good idea, it's taking away freedom and it's just making this country more religious in a way.

  • That could be challenged as it would affect everyone .

  • Also, I love the outfit, Darlie! :-)

  • Thank you Peter .

  • You're welcome. :-)

  • What about non-Christian hetero couples? Such a law would just encourage people to not marry. And not have joint insurance coverage. Which is a bad thing.

    The biological requirements for parenthood do not follow social dictates. I do agree that some minimum parental training in HS should be required.

    Lovely seeing you Dear.

  • Thank you. Well, I think it would encourage people to think before they marry but they can always have civil unions instead. Ff they marry less they will divorce less and since divorce is destructive to children that will be good.

  • I love the idea. My parents are divorced, and that has been very inconvenient for me.

  • I believe in Darwins nature selection

  • I'm trying to comment.

  • Okay, high school girl cannot be parent - she gets pregnant - they must take the kid away?

    We'll have to become a more atheistic country before we outlaw teaching religion.

  • Depends, if her parents are willing , have a high school education and qualify for all the other requirements they can sponsor her. The important thing is that the child gets the care it needs in a family that will love and not neglect it like 80% of this countries parents do.

  • great idea! you've got my vote!

    ~mO~

  • Thanks Maria. It will take everyone to protect marriage.

  • You've got my vote too, Darlie! :-)

  • Ban Marriage

  • But Shane, half the fun is making others suffer with you ?

  • Darlie, you must be joking, right? XD

    Honestly, though, I love the idea. My parents are divorced, and that has been very inconvenient for me.

    Oh, I love all these ideas! :D

  • No Peter, I'm totally serious.

  • I know, I was joking.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more