@DallasFanTillThaEnd Oh, don't get me wrong, I love Howard and the plays he did for us, that 99 yd return was sick but without Favre's plays in SB 31, I KNOW we lose that game.
@sikesy7 Don't appreciate our past heros?...Hmmm. You couldn't be any more wrong. We immortalize our past heros such as Starr and Nitschke, among others. It's the ones that act like divas toward the end of their careers, play for RIVAL teams, and then sweep us, that we tend to "throw out the door." Why would you put out a blanket statement based on one instance? You have NO idea how Packer fans feel about our past heros, sit down...
@13eN90 no idea? i live in Wisconsin bitch so you sit the fuck down. favre was a competitor who couldnt step awayfrom the game that he loved so much. your going to hate on a guy who had too much heart to quit? cant hate on a guy that just wants to play. you guys moved on and threw him out the door and he wanted to keep playing you guys just didnt want him playing anywhere else besides greenbay lets see how you treat arodg in 15 years with the new qb is in town and your pushing arodg out the door
@sikesy7 Oooh, I see your another one of those Favre dick riders that doesn't wanna let go of the past. Favre coulda came back after the 07 season, but training camp started and Favre still didnt make up his mind...again. By that time Rodgers was already promised the starting job. Favre was told he could compete for it and he got offended and left. Favre is a drama queen in every sense of the word. Rodgers is a better QB and has way more class. Nobody pushed Favre out...he left. Ur irrational
@13eN90 nah im not your just on the bandwagon sucking on rodgers dick sack cuz he won you a superbowl so fast that you throw out your past heroes. which is why greenbay fans suck cuz their prisoners of the moment. yall are selfish and only think of yourselves you dont give a shit about the players themselves just like you dont give a shit about rodgers... get off rodgers dick
@sikesy7 Ur so irrational. You can't intelligently argue with anything i said b4 so you resort to callin me names...pathetic. Bandwagon fan? The '06 season the Packers went 4-12, i watched every game of that season, so dont tell me shit about a fuckin "bandwagon." As soon as Favre went to the vikings, he became the enemy, cuz I'm a PACKER fan. No one player is above a team. Now whos suckin whos dick? Ya little Favre dick rider. Dont even respond if you cant have a civilized discussion. Idiot....
Heck...Packers coulda won the SB with Favre in 08. Favre set a Jets record for TD passes against the NFC SB team that year. He even coulda won in 2009 if the dang Saints game wasn't a sham
Coulda woulda shoulda if Ryan Grant had more than 25 yards in the entire 2007 postseason...he fumbled twice in 2 carries against Seattle bam it's 0-14. Favre took over and scored what 7 straight Tds??? Nobody remembers that or the fact that the Giants beat the Packers all up and down the field. How we mustered 20 points that game I don't know
Brett Favre could have won up to 4 superbowl rings in his career if he had just been a little more smart an a play here or there. They should have beat Denver the year Elway won their first. They shouldn't have lost to the Giants in the NFC title game..and they shouldn't have lost to the Saints either.
and Brett didnt lead the league those years in every category, only 1995 he lead in td's and yds.Otherwise the other 2 years just td's , and never once in qb rating unless he did when he was in the purple uniform.And probably ints too many years ard too count
@WarEagle140 you can't compare those seasons. Brett Favre already had 3 seasons of NFL experience by the time the 1995 season started. you need to compare each QB's first three seasons as a starter. the numbers are nearly identical, but lean slightly toward Rodgers because he can protect the ball better. and of course it took Aaron 3 seasons to get a ring vs Favre's 5. Favre's 95-97 vs Rodgers' 11-13 is yet to be seen.
@duvalinhn they were both 27 when they won the super bowl, and Favre won an MVP that year and Rodgers didn't but did win the SB MVP however if you look at Favre's numbers, he should've won the SB 31 MVP or at least tied with howard. Nothing against Rodgers, hes a good quarterback but he's no Brett Favre.
@WarEagle140 age means nothing compared to NFL experience. and MVP is just the opinion of a panel of journalists so I avoid using that award as a stat. I'm sure Favre would trade 2 MVP's for 2 Lombardis. Favre is physically way tougher. Rodgers is more intelligent, more mobile and more careful with the ball. Their arm strength is very similar. while Rodgers will never break any QB record set by Favre, I think he's a better pure passer and overall QB when you take his running skills into account.
@duvalinhn I think you're forgetting how fast Favre was in his prime. I think Rodgers may be faster but Favre could move as well. Also, Favre was very intelligent and spent more time in the game tape room reviewing games than anybody, including Manning, especially in his later years when he would go straight to the game film right after the game instead of celebrating the win. Favre also had a stronger arm, theres no doubt about that. Even at 40 he was throwing 65+ yds. Rodgers is more careful
@duvalinhn and those 3 MVP's he got he definitely deserved. He lead the league in almost every passing category those 3 years and lead the team to the NFC Championship in his first MVP season and the super bowl in the other 2 MVP seasons. Yes he would rather have trophy's instead but it is what it is. Rodgers is a good QB, too early to call him great yet but I think he will be great, but a Brett Favre he will never be. I think his passer rating will be higher cuz he will have less INTs tho
@WarEagle140 im a diehard packer fan first off, and watched brett from the beginning as well.But if you go by numbers alone and 1st 3 years rodgers is better.And as far as MVP's go lets be honest Favre should've only had 2 Barry Sanders had that one by himself easily but media votes that bs.Favre won us alot of games yes but lost some as well Giants nfc title game was a scared brett happy feet, its early and has many more years but rodgers on his way too being great and better than Brett
@golffreak68 Favre should have won SB 31 MVP (2 passing touchdowns, including SB record 81 yard td pass and a rushing touchdown) and in 01 he should have won MVP(missed out by 1 vote) and in 09 Favre or Brees should have won/tied MVP... and in 97, Favre played amazing as well and deserved the MVP too. Rodgers is good, but he has a long way to go to being a legend like Favre.. put aside your feelings on Favre and be honest
@golffreak68 I've been a loud Favre detractor since the divorce and the asinine treatment Favre dished out his final three years with the Pack, and the three years following, but Favre had one of the best runs in his "fat years" (25-27) of any QB ever. Comparing Favre from 25-27 and Rodgers 25-27 and Favre wins by a small margin. It's great that the Pack have had great QB'ing. Now if Favre had just concentrated on being the best PACKER QB he could be instead of trying to be GM too....
In other words, with the team that was constructed by 1995, Mark Brunell could have won at least one Super Bowl, if not more. He wouldn't have been around as long as Favre playing at as high a level (obviously Brunell is/was still in the league thru 2010) but who knows? Everything now would be different too, but we might have had it even better after 2000, or it could have been worse. But we know what we did get out of Favre, one SB, a huge ego, and screwed in the end.
@toolkien Possibly the dumbest two comments I've ever read. Rodgers is great, and the offense is more quarterback-centric now than it ever was with Favre. But Favre is one of the greatest of all time. Mark Brunell was good, but Favre could make throws Brunell could only dream of. The guy won three straight MVPs, had only one losing season in Green Bay (the same number Rodgers has already), went to back to back Super Bowls, and was tougher, by far, than any other QB in league history.
@toolkien I'm actually a bigger Rodgers fan, but he still has a ways to go before his career surpasses Brett's. What I will say is that the second half of this past season, and through the playoffs, Rodgers was playing at a higher level than Favre ever did.
If Brett had really retired (& sportsmen& women need to know when their best work is over & leave the scene gracefully, still being admired) he would not have gotten traded to the Jets & been involved in that tawdry episode which has tarnished him as a man. Temptations for sportsmen are huge and ever-present. Some people might think it makes no difference how they live their lives. But it does matter. It matters because honor matters and honor is not easily regained and maybe never will be.
MVP's are personal. Most of Favre's accomplishments are personal. If a guy runs up great personal stats AND wins my team a string of Lombardis, great. If not? Then I examine just exactly what he did for my team. One Super Bowl when my team had its second best team ever in its history, in a playoff run where that guy had the lowest average attempts (i.e. had to rely on him the least) and not much else other than a string of low level playoff exits on his INTs, isn't good enough where it counts.
jeez stop asking about Brett you can tell he doesnt want to talk about it
cloo143608 1 month ago
@DallasFanTillThaEnd Oh, don't get me wrong, I love Howard and the plays he did for us, that 99 yd return was sick but without Favre's plays in SB 31, I KNOW we lose that game.
WarEagle140 4 months ago
it all comes down to packer fans dont appreciate their past heros they use them up and throw them out the door with disrespect. what a shame....
sikesy7 4 months ago
@sikesy7 Don't appreciate our past heros?...Hmmm. You couldn't be any more wrong. We immortalize our past heros such as Starr and Nitschke, among others. It's the ones that act like divas toward the end of their careers, play for RIVAL teams, and then sweep us, that we tend to "throw out the door." Why would you put out a blanket statement based on one instance? You have NO idea how Packer fans feel about our past heros, sit down...
13eN90 4 months ago
@13eN90 no idea? i live in Wisconsin bitch so you sit the fuck down. favre was a competitor who couldnt step awayfrom the game that he loved so much. your going to hate on a guy who had too much heart to quit? cant hate on a guy that just wants to play. you guys moved on and threw him out the door and he wanted to keep playing you guys just didnt want him playing anywhere else besides greenbay lets see how you treat arodg in 15 years with the new qb is in town and your pushing arodg out the door
sikesy7 4 months ago
@sikesy7 Oooh, I see your another one of those Favre dick riders that doesn't wanna let go of the past. Favre coulda came back after the 07 season, but training camp started and Favre still didnt make up his mind...again. By that time Rodgers was already promised the starting job. Favre was told he could compete for it and he got offended and left. Favre is a drama queen in every sense of the word. Rodgers is a better QB and has way more class. Nobody pushed Favre out...he left. Ur irrational
13eN90 4 months ago
@13eN90 nah im not your just on the bandwagon sucking on rodgers dick sack cuz he won you a superbowl so fast that you throw out your past heroes. which is why greenbay fans suck cuz their prisoners of the moment. yall are selfish and only think of yourselves you dont give a shit about the players themselves just like you dont give a shit about rodgers... get off rodgers dick
sikesy7 4 months ago
@sikesy7 Ur so irrational. You can't intelligently argue with anything i said b4 so you resort to callin me names...pathetic. Bandwagon fan? The '06 season the Packers went 4-12, i watched every game of that season, so dont tell me shit about a fuckin "bandwagon." As soon as Favre went to the vikings, he became the enemy, cuz I'm a PACKER fan. No one player is above a team. Now whos suckin whos dick? Ya little Favre dick rider. Dont even respond if you cant have a civilized discussion. Idiot....
13eN90 4 months ago
@sikesy7 I started it? Wow ur delusional...read my first comment kid, I didn't call you shit. Im done w/ you...fuckin idiot....
13eN90 4 months ago
@sikesy7 i didnt realize the fans were the ones who got rid of favre...
gammster777 4 months ago
Heck...Packers coulda won the SB with Favre in 08. Favre set a Jets record for TD passes against the NFC SB team that year. He even coulda won in 2009 if the dang Saints game wasn't a sham
60BloodyChamp60 5 months ago
Coulda woulda shoulda if Ryan Grant had more than 25 yards in the entire 2007 postseason...he fumbled twice in 2 carries against Seattle bam it's 0-14. Favre took over and scored what 7 straight Tds??? Nobody remembers that or the fact that the Giants beat the Packers all up and down the field. How we mustered 20 points that game I don't know
60BloodyChamp60 5 months ago
Brett Favre could have won up to 4 superbowl rings in his career if he had just been a little more smart an a play here or there. They should have beat Denver the year Elway won their first. They shouldn't have lost to the Giants in the NFC title game..and they shouldn't have lost to the Saints either.
jeffbrister2004 6 months ago
and Brett didnt lead the league those years in every category, only 1995 he lead in td's and yds.Otherwise the other 2 years just td's , and never once in qb rating unless he did when he was in the purple uniform.And probably ints too many years ard too count
golffreak68 8 months ago
@golffreak68 is 1 too many to count?
WarEagle140 7 months ago
the door opened n closed nobody walked through
lastactioncat 8 months ago
@lastactioncat It was Claude Rains...
toolkien 7 months ago
all i have to say to this is look at the 1995-1997 season's for Favre and compare them to Rodgers past 3 years. Favre is better people.
WarEagle140 9 months ago
@WarEagle140 you can't compare those seasons. Brett Favre already had 3 seasons of NFL experience by the time the 1995 season started. you need to compare each QB's first three seasons as a starter. the numbers are nearly identical, but lean slightly toward Rodgers because he can protect the ball better. and of course it took Aaron 3 seasons to get a ring vs Favre's 5. Favre's 95-97 vs Rodgers' 11-13 is yet to be seen.
duvalinhn 9 months ago
@duvalinhn they were both 27 when they won the super bowl, and Favre won an MVP that year and Rodgers didn't but did win the SB MVP however if you look at Favre's numbers, he should've won the SB 31 MVP or at least tied with howard. Nothing against Rodgers, hes a good quarterback but he's no Brett Favre.
WarEagle140 9 months ago
@WarEagle140 age means nothing compared to NFL experience. and MVP is just the opinion of a panel of journalists so I avoid using that award as a stat. I'm sure Favre would trade 2 MVP's for 2 Lombardis. Favre is physically way tougher. Rodgers is more intelligent, more mobile and more careful with the ball. Their arm strength is very similar. while Rodgers will never break any QB record set by Favre, I think he's a better pure passer and overall QB when you take his running skills into account.
duvalinhn 9 months ago
@duvalinhn I think you're forgetting how fast Favre was in his prime. I think Rodgers may be faster but Favre could move as well. Also, Favre was very intelligent and spent more time in the game tape room reviewing games than anybody, including Manning, especially in his later years when he would go straight to the game film right after the game instead of celebrating the win. Favre also had a stronger arm, theres no doubt about that. Even at 40 he was throwing 65+ yds. Rodgers is more careful
WarEagle140 9 months ago
@duvalinhn and those 3 MVP's he got he definitely deserved. He lead the league in almost every passing category those 3 years and lead the team to the NFC Championship in his first MVP season and the super bowl in the other 2 MVP seasons. Yes he would rather have trophy's instead but it is what it is. Rodgers is a good QB, too early to call him great yet but I think he will be great, but a Brett Favre he will never be. I think his passer rating will be higher cuz he will have less INTs tho
WarEagle140 9 months ago
@WarEagle140 im a diehard packer fan first off, and watched brett from the beginning as well.But if you go by numbers alone and 1st 3 years rodgers is better.And as far as MVP's go lets be honest Favre should've only had 2 Barry Sanders had that one by himself easily but media votes that bs.Favre won us alot of games yes but lost some as well Giants nfc title game was a scared brett happy feet, its early and has many more years but rodgers on his way too being great and better than Brett
golffreak68 8 months ago
@golffreak68 Favre should have won SB 31 MVP (2 passing touchdowns, including SB record 81 yard td pass and a rushing touchdown) and in 01 he should have won MVP(missed out by 1 vote) and in 09 Favre or Brees should have won/tied MVP... and in 97, Favre played amazing as well and deserved the MVP too. Rodgers is good, but he has a long way to go to being a legend like Favre.. put aside your feelings on Favre and be honest
WarEagle140 7 months ago
@golffreak68 I've been a loud Favre detractor since the divorce and the asinine treatment Favre dished out his final three years with the Pack, and the three years following, but Favre had one of the best runs in his "fat years" (25-27) of any QB ever. Comparing Favre from 25-27 and Rodgers 25-27 and Favre wins by a small margin. It's great that the Pack have had great QB'ing. Now if Favre had just concentrated on being the best PACKER QB he could be instead of trying to be GM too....
toolkien 7 months ago
I really think he is tired of the Brett Favre questions!!!
Branbbe 11 months ago 13
I get the feeling if Aaron Rodgers had started for the Packers between 1992-2007 they would have won alot more than just one Super Bowl.
bax323 1 year ago 8
@bax323 Doubt it
WarEagle140 9 months ago
In other words, with the team that was constructed by 1995, Mark Brunell could have won at least one Super Bowl, if not more. He wouldn't have been around as long as Favre playing at as high a level (obviously Brunell is/was still in the league thru 2010) but who knows? Everything now would be different too, but we might have had it even better after 2000, or it could have been worse. But we know what we did get out of Favre, one SB, a huge ego, and screwed in the end.
toolkien 1 year ago
@toolkien Possibly the dumbest two comments I've ever read. Rodgers is great, and the offense is more quarterback-centric now than it ever was with Favre. But Favre is one of the greatest of all time. Mark Brunell was good, but Favre could make throws Brunell could only dream of. The guy won three straight MVPs, had only one losing season in Green Bay (the same number Rodgers has already), went to back to back Super Bowls, and was tougher, by far, than any other QB in league history.
sheegan8 1 year ago
@toolkien I'm actually a bigger Rodgers fan, but he still has a ways to go before his career surpasses Brett's. What I will say is that the second half of this past season, and through the playoffs, Rodgers was playing at a higher level than Favre ever did.
sheegan8 1 year ago
@sheegan8 dude, peyton manning still has a ways to go to catch up to brett's stats and stuff.
KenFan4life 11 months ago
If Brett had really retired (& sportsmen& women need to know when their best work is over & leave the scene gracefully, still being admired) he would not have gotten traded to the Jets & been involved in that tawdry episode which has tarnished him as a man. Temptations for sportsmen are huge and ever-present. Some people might think it makes no difference how they live their lives. But it does matter. It matters because honor matters and honor is not easily regained and maybe never will be.
MonsterBobBurns 1 year ago
Aaron Rodgers
csmith2124 1 year ago
GO LIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrStrongarms 1 year ago
I love Arod but Favre had a 3 years stretch of 3 straight mvps and 2 super bowls winning one. Although I do think Rodgers will have a better carrer.
lakr123 1 year ago
MVP's are personal. Most of Favre's accomplishments are personal. If a guy runs up great personal stats AND wins my team a string of Lombardis, great. If not? Then I examine just exactly what he did for my team. One Super Bowl when my team had its second best team ever in its history, in a playoff run where that guy had the lowest average attempts (i.e. had to rely on him the least) and not much else other than a string of low level playoff exits on his INTs, isn't good enough where it counts.
toolkien 1 year ago