Uhm...I'm going to go ahead and say that Iran alone is not in a position to start shit with all of Europe....even just a few European countries....France alone should be able to give Iran
What a load of bull shit, Iran is a 100% extremist country.it knew full well what it was doing attempting to develop nuclear weapons when the rest of the world is trying to disarm theirs.there aim is to cause chaos.and get russia and america fighting,the leader of iran believes he can summon some sort of Islamic demon that will take over the world if he succeeds, i know it sounds fucking stupid but its true lol
Europe is falling apart. The mindset of Iran, though, as a seeker for peace and justice and renewed spirituality that has been lost from western society and replaced by capitalist greed has already taken over Europe in the form of popular street protests.
As far as Muslims, peace can be attained only when the Jews and Christians are subdued and subservient to them, recognize them as superior, pay jizyah with willing submission and feeling themselves humiliated. If this is not your idea of peace, then prepare to defend yourself.
obama doesnt talk diplomacy he supported bombing libya killing thousands and destroying a stable socialist government led by gaddafi. Libya will now suffer the same fate of iraq, as a failed state ravaged by civil war and genocide, that is really diplomatic. Iran doesnt want to hurt anyone, if they were to want nuclear weopons it would be to prtoect themselves from the war mongering israel and US .
Theres no way Iran can win in straight up fight, but they are much more prepared than Iraq was so you should definitely expect many losses
And if we try to occupy them like we did with Iraq, we should expect thousands of casualties due to IED and Sniper attacks. Iran will be nothing like Iraq or Afghanistan, there will be much tougher resistance. Not to mention our aircraft will be much more vulnerable than they were in Iraq. In the end ... a war with Iran will destroy America economically
@BINGLEBOG1 Iran attacking Israel absolutely will happen and already has happened in the form of Hezbollah shooting rockets into Israel. It is only a matter of time until Iran supplies the nuclear tips for Hezbollah's the missiles.
@OwenIVx I didn't say Israel will attack Iran. I said Iran will attack Israel because they are no better than Islamic terrorist suicide bombers. How did you get confused about what I said?
if made a mistake, then i apologise unreservedly, but regards Iran Attacking israel it is absolutely never going to happen, Who else has Iran ever attacked? While Israel has attacked EVERY ONE of its neighbours at some point in the past.
israel are the biggest terrorists in the WORD, where ever there is trouble in the world, israel is ALWAYS right there amongst it and has usually caused the trouble.
@BINGLEBOG1 SICK FCUK NOB HEAD, You have been watching too many stupid films, you half backed runt of the litter. Your Mother was a great big FAT SOW, only ugly b-stards would touch her., you SICK FCUK. LOL LOL
Iran will launch a missile at Israel and then Iran will be obliterated but Iran doesn't care because they have nothing to lose and 72 virgins to gain.
the US and israel(aka the uncureable cancer ) are on the war path(and trigger happy) ......war is a solution to economic recovery so the yanks are itching
WW3 on its way , my bet says dec 2012 (the start of the ending)
the US and israel(aka the uncureable cancer ) are on the war path(and trigger happy) ......war is a solution to economic recovery so the yanks are itching
WW3 on its way , my bet says dec 2012 (the start of the ending)
@mickey0667 bro u r fucked in the head. u really need help. its people like you who judges the book by its cover. funny thing is Israel book cover says " DEATH TO THE MIDDLE EAST ALL MUSLIMS SHOULD DIE" but the only thing you see is " We are the victim :( " boohoo
All I can say is that Iran are total idiots if they are NOT trying to make the bomb. USA have made it clear by example that they will attack you even if you get rid of all your WMD's.
Also I gotta say... if I was Iran, I WOULD want nukes. I mean Iraq was invaded to their west and Afghanistan to their east. I can imagine that'd make them squirmy. Plus they have oil or natural gas I think. Maybe both. And as it runs out, the US will want to make up a reason to invade Iran to secure it. You know how that goes. They did it with Iraq.
Iran wouldn't be able to take over Europe, because even if they had nukes, we have nukes too.
What Iran really wants is to force the US to end it's blockade by nuclear threat. It's about economics really. Iran is moving away from it's theocracy even. It's one of the few muslim countries that's investing in REAL science instead of the usual muslim creationist bullshit most muslim countries to.
Iran might take over Bahrain or Southern Iraq though. (but eh, they can have it. IMO)
One thing we've learned from WWII is, whenever someone says they want to kill us all - we believe them. Iranian leadership was very clear about their intention to do just that. Whom am I to believe, them or Cenk? Oh yes, Cenk of course. Why not take his word. It's not like his family is going to be evaporated if he is wrong, right?
This video is from 2008. The news media and treasoners in the government have been painting Iran unfairly to the American public for few decades now to prepare it to invade Iran. One big terrorist strike done by treasonsers and blamed on Iran and fake Al Qaeda is all that is needed.
well young Turks you got it wrong they tried to fly it the problem was Russia and China had planes up in moments Iran weapons where ready and it was a bad ideal they had planed to bomb them in 2009 pushed it off till 2010 why they try to make USA do it for them the problem is China owns there ass economically the reason they needed to raise the dept ceiling is because there is not enough cash in America its all in china south America and Israels banks they needed to print more no cash no war
@ISuperLoveMovies What the hell is wrong with you? we were not a threat to the world we tried to be the peace keepers but people can't seem to know what peace means... and plus
We did not attack panama we had to rescue Americans at the U.S Embassy Kidnapped from there!
neither did Grenada we had to save U.S Students!!!
Vietnam they pretty much started the war not us they attacked a u.s patrol boat and invaded south vietnam!
@Eskimo407 Peace keepers? US government knew that Al-Qaeda was not in Iraq, yet the went there and know 650'000 civilians have lost their lives.
The US patrol boat that was sent specifically to BE attacked (in North V) (was on spying mission and attacked FIRST) so that the US could get a free hand in starting a war. They did not want South Vietnam to fall into communism because they thought a domino effect would start and the hole region would fall into communism = US has less control over it
@ISuperLoveMovies Al Qaeda doesnt even exist, there isnt even real proof of it existing. It is all scam, fraud, The Zionists are controlling everything with the US as their puppets.
@TheSerbianguy Whether they exist or not, the US is using as a tool to start wars, which result in millions of deaths. And yes I agree on the Zionist part
@Eskimo407 Do you think the only thing they did was to rescue people in Panama? Hey dissolved their defense forces as well as deposing their leader...
@ISuperLoveMovies Thats Wiki all the "facts" from that site are not true, read from a real textbook it tells you what really happened, Panama was already in civil war and the government was corrupt might as well help them right? cause we can't just sit there and just watch people die everyday and a country to fall apart. (no argument here)
@Eskimo407 Just like you cant in the once beautiful places called Iraq, Lybia, Yugoslavia (especially Serbia, no personal reasons though) with their "dictators".
@Eskimo407 Oh mister smarty pants, A us patrol boat in Vietnamese area is the reason to start a war, i dont think so. If i were you i would ask your history teacher *which is also brainwashed maybe* to educate you a bit. Seems that Americans cant handle that MASSIVE AMOUNT of education, WINK WINK. And tell me why Iraq and Afghanistan is pretty obvious? Because you follow the same stereotype set by Zionists and Americans that every single Arab is a Suicide bomber wearing a turban? Oh please.
maybe if you didn't think like a small child you would be able to understand adult situations.
yes, those countries have nuclear weapons. But you can't just get rid of your nuclear weapons completely all at once. There's something called the balance of power.
And nearly all of those countries that you mentioned that the U.S. attacked were authorized by the people of those countries.
Iran on the other hand has said that it wants to wipe israel off the map.
@andrewm153351 the is fact that ahmadinejad DID NOT say that he wants to wipe Israel off the map. That was a deliberate mistranslation. What he said was something like (more or less word by word) that Israels govn't is a bad one and should therefor be deposed and the page be turned so that the people can continue to live their lives better. And with the resent demonstrations you can see that Israelis aren't happy w/ their govn't
Get your facts straight and stop listening to propaganda
@andrewm153351 The fact that you cant get rid of nuclear weapons at once is irrelevant as those countries that have it are keeping it.
Are you seriously suggesting that the the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc authorized the US to attack them? the people authorized it?? was there a voting?? So basically the 600'000 iraqis killed wanted to get killed? Besides it is not the people who decide this kind of matter it's the government.
@andrewm153351 Then if it will make your country militariliy weaker than why shouldn't Iran have nukes when both Israel and the US are clear threats??
if US had the intention of just killing Saddam then why, now 5 years after, are they still there killing people?
If their sole intention was to kill Saddam then they would had done it without slaughtering more than half million Iraqis.
Are you a child? Why do you ask such childish questions? Obviously iran can't have nukes because it will cause an arms race in the region, which could in turn cause an all out nuclear war. And the U.S. and the rest of the nuclear-armed countries are TRYING to all get rid of the nukes together over time.
Why are we still in iraq? Because we are helping the new government become stabilized. The new iraqi government said its a mistake for us to leave(which we are doing)
Besides, it just takes a quick goolge to finds some info just google "was iraq better/worse during Saddam" - all those hits on page one (didn't look further) suggest that Iraq is way worse now than under Saddam.... so yeah, not only have you killed more than HALF A MILLION PEOPLE but you have left the country in a worse state than when you came
So it is okay for all other countries except iran to have nukes? Iran is being thretend by 2 nuclear countries so of course they are going to try have some in order to defend themselves. Iran will not start a war, and is therefor not a threat to the US or isreal (and therefore they should shut up about Iran having nukes since they pose a bigger threat to the world since the US start wars as a hobby). Anyone who things Iran will make the first move is beyond stupid.
You're idiotic mind still can't comprehend the situation with iran.
We can't help the fact that countries ALREADY have nukes, except for the fact that we are dramatically lowering our stockpiles. But what we CAN'T have is NEW countries obtaining nukes, because it will start an arms race. What part of this do you not understand?
Why is iran being threatened? BECAUSE OF THEIR NUCLEAR PROGRAM YOU IDIOT.
Iran won't start a war? Maybe. but they WILL invade their surroundings.
what don't you understand when I say 2 countries that are aggressively against iran have nukes and could very well use it. Don't you think the country feels threatened by that? And you can't help the fact that you already have nukes? then what the hell were you thinking in the first place when you obtained it?? to late for regretting that but you started rolling the ball. If the US stopped their propaganda and threats against iran, Iran would no have a reason to get nukes.
What the fuck are you talking about in your last message? I never said we aren't aggressive towards iran. But the ONLY reason we are is because they are making nukes. Do you really think we would think about attacking iran if they weren't making nukes?
I have already told you that we CAN'T help the fact that we already have nukes, because getting rid of them all at once would be deadly. We have brought down our stockpiles by 80% though.
Iran having nukes is none of the US business + they are saying that they aren't making weapons.... I'm not saying it's true, but who are they (the US) to say who gets to have what when numerous other countries have it as well. and don't come with the shit that they are getting rid of it, i don't care. They have it and they can use it
"but who are they (the US) to say who gets to have what when numerous other countries have it as well"
OH...MY....GOD...
I have already showed you why new countries can't have nukes. And i have already told you that all countries are seeking to get rid of nukes. You just can't do it over night.
How does getting rid of nukes not matter to what we are talking about? do you know what an arms race is? No countries in the middle east want iran to have nukes. NONE
What's the point of the video, there are countless videos with americans saying and arguing if the should attack iran + them creating war propaganda (i'm sure you know that the US is talking about starting a war anyhow..)
In all of those videos it shows Americans talking about a DEFENSIVE strategy to attack iran's nuclear plants.I don't understand how YOU don't understand that iran with nuclear weapons won't be good for the world at all.
I can't believe that you ACTUALLY have to dupe so low as to saying you speak persian. Again, you're not fooling anyone, only making yourself look extremely desperate and stupid.
First of all, anyone can find an online translator. Don't think you're fooling anyone into believing you speak persian you clown.
Secondly, i think i'll take the analysis of a international translator over what you got from an online translator.
And even IF he was referring to the regime(which he wasn't) that still is insinuating that he wants to WIPE israel away, which is still an utterly obvious sign of provocation.
Are you SERIOUS? You're even more deluded than i thought if you're ACTUALLY trying to imply that iran isn't constructing nuclear weapons. First off, it's not the U.S. that is saying they're building nukes, it's the ENTIRE UN. I can send you source after source proving they are indeed building nukes.
And the difference between the U.S. being behind 9/11 and iran building nukes is that one claim has an overwhelming amount of proof on its side, the other doesn't.
@andrewm153351 I haven't stated that I don't believe that Iran is constructing nuclear weapons.
ok, send me reliable sources that show proof (100%) that Iran is making nuclear weapons and not using it for peaceful proposes. I'm not saying there aren't any.
It's beyond me that you actually believe that fabricated story.
Yeah right use that as an excuse. Funny how you think I'm trying to "fool" you into that I speak Persian. Like that's my goal: fool ppl on the internet that I speak a language
Don't even try to act like you didn't IMPLY that iran isn't constructing nuclear weapons. You clearly did. You even compared it to the accusation of the U.S. government orchestrating 9/11 which has no basis in reality whatsoever.
Sure, you just HAPPEN to say that you speak persian in an argument about the translation of persian words. HOW CONVENIENT. Again, you're not the first person to falsely claim things over the internet.
Ahmadinejad says the US was behind 9/11 just like the US says Iran is constructing nuclear weapons, or blaming Iran for being behind a ridiculous "saudi ambassador plot".
It's not like the US is telling the entire truth about 9/11 anyhow, they don't even mention Saudi Arabia. I don't think the US was behind 9/11 though.
Although they have planed similar things before like operation northwoods.
There is also a plethora of proof that iran was behind the ambassador plots. This is besides the fact that it is well known that the perpetrator who was caught has well known ties to the iranian government.
Also, i don't have skype, but if i did, im pretty sure i could fake a language while online too. Again, you're NOT fooling anyone.
Operation northwoods was denied action by the U.S. government, so that has no basis in reality whatsoever.
I have NEVER stated that I don't think Iran is constructing nuclear weapons..
When I compared it with those stuff it was because none of those are facts, just assumptions.
My parents are Iranian born so again yes I do speak persian. Yeah try faking Persian and see how well you would do
Haha, it has no basis in reality? all documents are on public domain etc. You only believe things that boost your ego and look past everything else. It was denied? Iran denies having nukes.
that is not "directly" imping that I think it's building nukes when I write what the US is suspecting, you idiot.
Again, it takes 2 sec to get a skype account, what are you afraid of. Secondly, if I don't speak persian then you are not speaking english but using various sources to write here, lol.
@ISuperLoveMovies When you say that the U.S. is solely "suspecting" that iran is building nukes, you make it sound like some big scheme that the u.s. is pulling to attack iran, which implies that you don't think iran is building nukes. Don't even try to argue against this, because it is blatantly obvious.
When i started typing in English, language wasn't the issue, but YOU miraculously announced you speak persian that just HAPPENS to be in an argument about Persian translation.
Whatever. We both know that you insinuated that iran isn't building nukes, and that its only the U.S. lying about them. This is out in the open, and anyone reading our comments will understand this.
Wow. please don't even try to cover up what is well known. I have already proven to you that you insinuated that it was a lie from the U.S. saying iran was building nukes and that we "don't have proof".
And then you come back(after i send you proof) and say that you were saying they are building nukes all along.
Whoever said i was kidding about speaking 35 languages? I also have 7 PhD's.
Wow. i can't believe you're ACTUALLY still trying to cover up what you meant. It's ok, we all make mistakes...
You didn't say iran is building nukes, you said America SPECULATES that iran is building nukes, which DIRECTLY implies that it's merely us making up lies about iran. You even said that the claim isn't backed up by facts, that is until i proved your wrong.
I stay on youtube because im a multi-billionaire who does whatever i want all day.
since I didn't write it why are you making up that I wrote it? if you interpret things different from what is said it's not my problem. The site you gave me said that there was evidence, but it didn't give any. This is like Iraq when they said that it had wmd.
What are you trying to say that you didn't write? You DID write "America SPECULATES that iran is building nukes". Are you denying you wrote that?
Everything else i said you IMPLIED or INSINUATED, which you clearly did.
The IAEA and UN have reported that they ARE going to release the information next week. When they do, im going to send you a big "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA"
WOW. again, everyone reading these comments will clearly see that you implied that it was just America making it up. You even said that it is equivalent to America saying iran was behind the saudi assassination attempt-which they were, and there's proof-
There is no hiding this kind of mistake.
You will only embarrass yourself even further if you continue acting like you never did it.
Everyone reading will see that I have never written or stated that I believe that iran wasn't behind it.
Why would Iran want to assassinate a saudi guy in the US using a sloppy guy through the Mexican drugcartel (why would even they do it), when there are plenty of saudis near Iran. + why are the interrogation recordings of the guy suddenly gone? + what would Iran's government gain from this
How can you say that you never said iran wasn't behind the assassination plot, and then RIGHT after that say that you think it's improbable that iran was behind the assassination plot?
And by the way, you compared America "claiming" iran had nukes to iran claiming america was behind 911. THERE YOU GO. THAT IS A CLEAR IMPLICATION.
And the guy who was caught had KNOWN ties to high iranian military officials. There is no hiding this anymore, there is way too much proof.
When I wrote "t I have never written or stated that I believe that Iran wasn't behind it" I was talking about nukes not the assassination plot.
Saying something does not make it a fact. When Ahmadinejad claimed america may be behind 9/11 it does not make it a fact and vice versa.
The US officials have not offered any specific evidence linking the "plot" to Iran's leaders, which the US claim they knew. The 100 000 $ wasn't even transacted from Iran. Total groundless accusation
Instead of threatening Iran there are numerous other countries that they could threat. Including the US which pose the biggest threat. Iran is not going to use any nukes unless the US or Israel attack them. idiot.
they will invade their surroundings? haha, you're the biggest idiot ever. Iran won't to shit outside of their country.
The US does the invading in this world. Iran hasn't invaded a country for hundreds of years.
Stop listening to propaganda your government feeds you
"there are numerous other countries that they could threat"
There is no other country out there this is trying to get nukes that also threatens to destroy one of our strongest allies. What you said is once again false.
How can you say iran wouldn't attack israel, when they have said over and over again that that's exactly what they want to do? For christ's sake, hezbollah(funded by iran) has a fucking mushroom cloud as it's symbol.
iwhen has iran threatened to destroy israel?? you are just an outcome of your countries propaganda. Iran did not say that they would destroy or "wipe israel of the map". i pity you for being so dumb. What they said was that Israels government is a bad one and should therefore be deposed. Ahmadinejad did NOT say that he/iran would attack them or ANYTHING like that .wtf in that isn't it that you don't understand.
+ iran hasn't attack any cnty in 100yrs unlike US+Isr
When has iran threatened to destroy israel??? SERIOUSLY? Not only do they constantly talk about how israel is evil and needs to be wiped clean, but their own organization Hezbollah routinely shells gaza. I can give you countles urls showing iran saying they want israel off the map from SEVERAL translators. So don't even try to act like they never said that.. They aslo have routine demonstrations of destroying israel-
@andrewm153351 I HAVE TOLD YOU THAT THAT WAS A DELIBERATE MISTRANSLATION. what is it that you don't udnerstand.
I FUCKING SPEAK PERSIAN AND HE DOES NOT SAY IT, jesus. what he says is that israels government is a bad one and should therefor be deposed. He did not say ANYTHING about that he/iran is going to do shit.
He has though on multiple occasions said that iran does not have any intentions of starting a war.
Isreal on the other hand is constantly trying to get US to start one.
First of all, you're not fooling anyone when you say that you speak persian. You're not the first person to have claimed that you can do something over the internet. By the way, i speak every language in the world. ;)
I'm pretty sure it would have been big news if Ahmadinejad was taken out of context, being that his translated speech was broadcasted in America and everywhere else, where ther are plenty of persian-speaking individuals. And did you not see that video i posted?
you can continue to be ignorant and believe everything your government tells you i couldn't care less.
Google "ahmadinejad translation controversy" on wikipedia and then go to translation controversy, you can read about there as well.
And yes I DO speak Persian.
And no it would not be big news because that his how your country brainwashes people like you. people do not speak as loud as a government does through media.
"All official translations of Mr. Ahmadinejad's statement, including a description of it on his website, refer to wiping Israel away. Sohrab Mahdavi, one of Iran’s most prominent translators, and Siamak Namazi, managing director of a Tehran consulting firm, who is bilingual, both say “wipe off” or “wipe away” is more accurate than "vanish" because the Persian verb is active and transitive."
At a news conference, Ahmadinejad stated his speech had been exaggerated and misinterpreted. "There is no new policy, they created a lot of hue and cry over that. It is clear what we say: Let the Palestinians participate in free elections and they will say what they want." Speaking at a D-8 summit meeting in July 2008, he denied that his country would ever instigate military action. Instead he claimed that "the Zionist regime" in Israel would eventually collapse on its own.
Well of course he would say this AFTER his comments caused an uproar.
Again, it's quite odd how iran's puppet army(Hezbollah) has a mushroom cloud as their symbol....quite odd....
You keep talking about how he denies this, and he denies that. Remember this is the man who is BLATANTLY constructing nuclear weapons, and then saying that he isn't. he also says that 9/11 was orchestrated by the U.S. government....
It doesn't MATTER if iran hasn't attacked anyone. The fact remains that they do not want israel in the middleeast. This is purely fact.
Iran having nukes is none of our business? Do you understand how childish that sounds? It matters to the WHOLE WORLD if a threatening country is trying to obtain nukes.
Don't even try to act like iran isn't making nukes. I can send url after url after url showing this to be demonstrably untrue.
Ahmadinejad has said that there should be a voting there in palestine to see what they want, since Israel just came out of nowhere and claimed the land that belonged to palestien. He said that there should be a voting about what they want to do and the just f do it.
NV did invade SV, but what does the US have to do with it. They should stop being so nosy and mind their own business and stop interfering in peoples (countries) affairs because they only make things worse.
I know charlie or whatever his name was was sent to prison. It doesn't change the fact the US soldiers were behind those atrocities
And I know the vietnam war began before the gulf of tonkin incident that is why i wrote ONGOING war.... so the fail is on your part.
"NV did invade SV, but what does the US have to do with it"
YOU FUCKING IDIOT.
The U.S. was ALLIES with south vietnam. I don't know about you, but America doesn't like to run out from it's allies. You're completely downplaying the fact that NV ruthlessly invaded the south, killing thousands of innocent civilians, before we ever even intervened.
And you can't blame the U.S. military if the people who perpetrated the acts were sent to prison. That is completely childish
The U.S. already had plenty of jurisdiction to intervene before the gulf of tonkin, being that SV was a strong military ally. Your argument is flawed from the start.
And let me point out to you AGAIN that saddam killed nearly 2 million people. The fact that you think the U.S. killed more is astoundingly stupid.
"give me a source to that south vietnam and teh US were allies before the us stagint the gulf of tonkin incident"
You idiot. We were allies with SV since theState of Vietnam referendum, 1955. Go and google it. During the cold war, the soviet union became allies with the north, and we became allies with the south.
Anyhow, I don't give a shit about what your opinion is on what. A take it you're an american so you're just going to be biased consciously or unconsciously and not believe anything that goes against your beliefs, so I see no reason to continue arguing
Again, saddam killed at the very least several hundred thousand of his own civilians.
And the very highest estimate according to Iraq's own body count shows that around 112,000 iraqis have died in the iraq war.
And a HUGE part of this that ou don't understand is that over 3/4ths of those civilian deaths in the iraq war were from IRAQI'S THEMSELVES. Ever heard of suicide bombings?
@andrewm153351 They've been in Afghanistan for 10 years now and they say that they are half done. The only thing they're doing there is to kill people and get their own men killed. Besides how big of a threat is the taliban to the US? What's going on in each country and what govt they have shouldn't lead to another count starting a war against thm
The US attacked NV because they thought that if SV would fall into communism nearby countries would do so as well, like the so called "domino effect"
You still have not answered my questions about the taliban and the saddam regime. You clearly don't know the history of these two powers. "how big of a threat is the taliban to the US?" WOW. This shows how ignorant you are.
You are totally misconstruing what happened in the vietnam war.
North vietnam invaded south vietnam FIRST. We then went in to help south vietnam fight off north vietnam. That is all that happened.
@andrewm153351 The US got involved in the ongoing Vietnam war because they didn't want SV to fall into communism (since they thought if they did, the whole S.E asia would follow and become communist) so they staged the gulf of tonkin incident were they interfered with NV radio signals in order to get NV to attack them. They then used this as a reason to go into the war. Their official reason to help SV etc, can be crushed with the My Lai massacre were the US soldiers killed HUNDREDS of civilians
You still have not acknowledged the fact that it was North vietnam that ruthlessly invaded and attacked south vietnam.
South Vietnam was already an ally for the U.S., so you can't possibly not understand why we would go fight. Unless you are blindly stupid, which im beginning to think is the case.
You do know that the soldiers who orchestrated the my lai massacre were arrested and sent to prison?
BTW the vietnam war began long before the gulf of tonkin incident.
The US has no right to start a war and kill hundreds of thousands of people, no matter their government.
The reason why the US started the Iraq war was because Saddam was going to start sell his oil in Euro rather than dollars, which would mean major blow for the US dollar.
The thing about Saddam is when he was alive he killed people. Now the US has taken his role and kill people (iraqis). so no I do not think it's better without him because the US has killed more.
Actually they had every right in the books according to the U.N. And last time i checked, it wasn't just the U.S. that was involved in all of these wars.
And your wrong YET AGAIN about the U.S. killing more civilians than saddam. Saddam was known to have killed almost 2 million of his own people. And keep in mind that many of the civilians killed in the U.S.-iraq war were from suicide bombings from terrorists.
@andrewm153351 You seem to have completely shunned the fact that iraq was better during saddams rule than what the US has done with the country.
Okay so the US can start bombing and attacking every country in the world because the UN allows countries to go to war. How good we have the us to make peace by bombing and killing people.
Stunned that iraq was better during saddams rule? I have already proven this wrong, so i don't know what you're talking about. And the fact that there was more CIVIL peace during saddam's regime was because of his ruthlessnes. He would murder you if you were an opposing party let alone a terrorist.
You REALLY think that the only thing the US does is bomb and kill civilians? You do realize that our government give more foreign aid by FAR than any other country right?
The iraq war started because not only the US intelligence agencies, but french, german and uk intelligence agencies all had concluded that saddam had WMD's. Yes, they were wrong, but that is nonetheless how the war started. What does france, germany and the uk have to do with the U.S. dollar? Do you see how flawed your statement is? And why did all of the iraqis tear down saddam's statues and posters after we invaded? Was that all some big conspiracy?
Just because someone says something does not make it true. aren't people told that like in first grade.
I seriously doubt that the US government ATTACKED another country based on information they were given from other countries.
Maybe they tear down Saddams statue because he killed his own people????? I haven't said that his people liked him, absolutley not, what I say is that the country was better before the US invasion
"i seriously doubt the US government ATTACKED another contry based on infromation they were given from other countries"
Well that's where you're wrong(yet again). It is plain fact that the french and german intelligence agencies discovered that saddam was getting ready to stockpile WMD's. In fact, they were hesitant to tell the American government because they knew we would act quickly on it.
Israel fear Iran because Iran is a jihadist state. Israel does not know the answer to this question: do jihadist states fear Mutually Assured Destruction?
Isreal is been taken into protection due to the occourance of Hitlers WW2...GET OVER IT GUY...look what their doing to Palestine and the other Middle Eastern Nations
@machoverspeed ...especially considering we don't have solid proof of the nukes they have. Much like the WMDs we recovered in Iraq.....oh....nm we didn't find any yet we managed to fuck up Iraq more than it was during Saddam's regime and built ourselves an infinite enemy. Trust me as much as the news wants you to think that extreme religions exist in the millions, they don't. There are more Shi'ite in Iran who would be against extremist thinking and that is why nothing can happen.
@machoverspeed I am not saying Iran has a good agenda, that's doubtful actually, and lets say for a minute that its true they want to force religion on everyone, you honestly think they can succeed? lol. Do you think its Iran on one side and the U.S. on the other side and everyone else on the sidelines will just give in? seriously? I don't doubt Iran has nukes but when US and Israel most likely has 20 fold as many, we have no right to ask them to disengage from the nuke business.
@machoverspeed Show me this please. Show me Iranians demanding everyone join Islam please. Just because CNN or FOX paints an image for you doesn't mean the paint is permanent. This has nothing to do with Theocracy, has nothing to do with ethnicity or authority, not for us and not for Israel. This is a conflict of interest and Iran just doesn't wanna play along with Israel, and seeing how much Israeli dick we suck we just do whatever the hell Israel wants us to do.
@machoverspeed I love how I'm getting accused of being a Liberal when you know shit all about me. My point was that considering Israel, who also in your lifetime, has broken every international law possible and always acts like its above the law, I'll take my chances with Iran who hardly has a record over Israel. I'm not saying Iran is a saint but who the fuck is Israel and the who the fuck are we to be asking them to halt nuclear production when we do it?
@machoverspeed "Yeah but, Israel ain't likely to nuke Ft. Worth, are they?"
Lets get real here, when was the last time anyone fired a nuke? exactly...Just because the news makes out that Iran is a rogue state doesn't mean they are fuckin insane, they know if they fire a nuke they start WWIII and they eat it big time. And based on the last 60 years of history alone, Israel has committed more atrocities than we've heard the word Iran, so to be honest I'm more worried about Israel's nukes.
wow, a never thought id agree with a group called "the young turks" , but Cenk killed it on this one. Well said.. Look people, IRAN IS NOT THE PROBLEM, however, the IRANIAN YOUTH NEED YOU. You must provide the YOUTH with the means to democratize their own country! we cant do it through bombs
@TheYoungTurks Great video, your Americans World policies are threat to World peace. America must get rid of its mega and giga ton nukes, before they preach nuclear free-World. Up Until then, the rest of the World countries must seek protection from mad nation America.
@watchnsw lol you pro-zionists amaze me, since when did Iran threaten to wipe a country off? every Farsi prof in the effing globe will tell you all the News network are BSing and the President of Iran never said anything of that sort. Meanwhile, Israel had ALREADY wiped a country off the map, I mean you can barely see anything that says Palestine there in most maps. So you pathetic fails right in your face.
@matro1991 Lololololol that was israel responding to attacks on it hence the 6 day war....and there no such thing as "palestine" please show me it on a map.
@watchnsw I just told you there is NO Palestine on the map because Israel WIPED it off the map. So who are they to claim someone else has supposedly called for their destruction when every Farsi speaking person that has listen to the tapes said otherwise?
take over europe? Iran just defends itself against jewish terrorism. that's all.
sinand99 1 week ago
Uhm...I'm going to go ahead and say that Iran alone is not in a position to start shit with all of Europe....even just a few European countries....France alone should be able to give Iran
reason for regret.
JoryRFerrell 1 week ago
if the US gets involved, im definitely enlisting.
itsXsomeXdude 2 weeks ago
what all the non christians are doing in europe? right now at this minute everybody out
markos824 2 weeks ago
What a load of bull shit, Iran is a 100% extremist country.it knew full well what it was doing attempting to develop nuclear weapons when the rest of the world is trying to disarm theirs.there aim is to cause chaos.and get russia and america fighting,the leader of iran believes he can summon some sort of Islamic demon that will take over the world if he succeeds, i know it sounds fucking stupid but its true lol
MAD3IN3NG1AND 3 weeks ago
Europe is falling apart. The mindset of Iran, though, as a seeker for peace and justice and renewed spirituality that has been lost from western society and replaced by capitalist greed has already taken over Europe in the form of popular street protests.
scrabbe1 1 month ago
Even Obama who said would try diplomacy is now talking military talk
DDTphoenix 1 month ago
Iran can't even take over Pakistan.
RayKalmNiam 1 month ago
Israel can burn in hell! God's land? Fuck him, China is my land!
Ruttie2 1 month ago
@Ruttie2 god will remember that
RedneckGunn3 1 month ago
@RedneckGunn3 That also counts for Israel's war crimes! XD
Ruttie2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As far as Muslims, peace can be attained only when the Jews and Christians are subdued and subservient to them, recognize them as superior, pay jizyah with willing submission and feeling themselves humiliated. If this is not your idea of peace, then prepare to defend yourself.
alskyification 1 month ago
I think starting a war with Iran. Is very stupid idea to go to war. We are in to much war as it is.
james64468 1 month ago
Laughing at all the pissed off Jews in the comments below me... XD
lemob182 1 month ago 9
Comment removed
lemob182 1 month ago
This country has some mother ..fucker that will disagree with anything..They are willing to go to war get thousands kill just for arrogance..
cjrodrigs 1 month ago
Alex jones wannabe mother fucker
slowkills1 1 month ago
EAT SHIT
slowkills1 1 month ago
uhmm maybe if america asked nicely and said please they would stop
royshona 1 month ago
obama doesnt talk diplomacy he supported bombing libya killing thousands and destroying a stable socialist government led by gaddafi. Libya will now suffer the same fate of iraq, as a failed state ravaged by civil war and genocide, that is really diplomatic. Iran doesnt want to hurt anyone, if they were to want nuclear weopons it would be to prtoect themselves from the war mongering israel and US .
joekikass3000 1 month ago
Theres no way Iran can win in straight up fight, but they are much more prepared than Iraq was so you should definitely expect many losses
And if we try to occupy them like we did with Iraq, we should expect thousands of casualties due to IED and Sniper attacks. Iran will be nothing like Iraq or Afghanistan, there will be much tougher resistance. Not to mention our aircraft will be much more vulnerable than they were in Iraq. In the end ... a war with Iran will destroy America economically
muchookees 1 month ago
IGNORE THE WEIRD SUBTITLES
timewilltell7 1 month ago
everything hes saying is exactly right !!!!!!!!
zulu0610 1 month ago
@BINGLEBOG1 Iran attacking Israel absolutely will happen and already has happened in the form of Hezbollah shooting rockets into Israel. It is only a matter of time until Iran supplies the nuclear tips for Hezbollah's the missiles.
mickey0667 2 months ago
Comment removed
timewilltell7 1 month ago
@OwenIVx I didn't say Israel will attack Iran. I said Iran will attack Israel because they are no better than Islamic terrorist suicide bombers. How did you get confused about what I said?
mickey0667 2 months ago
@mickey0667
if made a mistake, then i apologise unreservedly, but regards Iran Attacking israel it is absolutely never going to happen, Who else has Iran ever attacked? While Israel has attacked EVERY ONE of its neighbours at some point in the past.
israel are the biggest terrorists in the WORD, where ever there is trouble in the world, israel is ALWAYS right there amongst it and has usually caused the trouble.
BINGLEBOG1 2 months ago
Who is this guy in video? He talks sense and thats unusual on American TV.
BINGLEBOG1 2 months ago 16
@BINGLEBOG1 SICK FCUK NOB HEAD, You have been watching too many stupid films, you half backed runt of the litter. Your Mother was a great big FAT SOW, only ugly b-stards would touch her., you SICK FCUK. LOL LOL
digitwoman 2 months ago
Iran will launch a missile at Israel and then Iran will be obliterated but Iran doesn't care because they have nothing to lose and 72 virgins to gain.
mickey0667 2 months ago
@mickey0667 If israel goes anywhere near Iran, Iran, Russia, India and China will blow the tiny plot of land apart.
OwenIVx 2 months ago
@OwenIVx I so hope your right
BINGLEBOG1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the US and israel(aka the uncureable cancer ) are on the war path(and trigger happy) ......war is a solution to economic recovery so the yanks are itching
WW3 on its way , my bet says dec 2012 (the start of the ending)
mcksean 2 months ago
the US and israel(aka the uncureable cancer ) are on the war path(and trigger happy) ......war is a solution to economic recovery so the yanks are itching
WW3 on its way , my bet says dec 2012 (the start of the ending)
mcksean 2 months ago
Cenk i think ur overreaching here. Wtf happened to you dude?
BookerT48 2 months ago
I believe Iran will send missiles to Israel because they are Islamic terrorist suicide bombers.
mickey0667 2 months ago
@mickey0667 bro u r fucked in the head. u really need help. its people like you who judges the book by its cover. funny thing is Israel book cover says " DEATH TO THE MIDDLE EAST ALL MUSLIMS SHOULD DIE" but the only thing you see is " We are the victim :( " boohoo
msskool 2 months ago
israel will attack...then iran will defend itself...then the shit will hit the fan..!
davycrocketful 2 months ago
It was space between that and the assassination plot because it was not related.
Are you brain-dead somehow, that is not MY evidence, that's the US's.
It amazes me how stupid people could be to actually believe the iranian government was behind the alleged plot.
Since you seem to believe it, enlighten me with some clear evidence that Iran's government was behind it, with no bs-ing
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
whats with the retarded sub titles
MegaSlayerr 2 months ago
All I can say is that Iran are total idiots if they are NOT trying to make the bomb. USA have made it clear by example that they will attack you even if you get rid of all your WMD's.
AngeCord 2 months ago
Also I gotta say... if I was Iran, I WOULD want nukes. I mean Iraq was invaded to their west and Afghanistan to their east. I can imagine that'd make them squirmy. Plus they have oil or natural gas I think. Maybe both. And as it runs out, the US will want to make up a reason to invade Iran to secure it. You know how that goes. They did it with Iraq.
TheSkunkCat 4 months ago
Iran wouldn't be able to take over Europe, because even if they had nukes, we have nukes too.
What Iran really wants is to force the US to end it's blockade by nuclear threat. It's about economics really. Iran is moving away from it's theocracy even. It's one of the few muslim countries that's investing in REAL science instead of the usual muslim creationist bullshit most muslim countries to.
Iran might take over Bahrain or Southern Iraq though. (but eh, they can have it. IMO)
TheSkunkCat 4 months ago
One thing we've learned from WWII is, whenever someone says they want to kill us all - we believe them. Iranian leadership was very clear about their intention to do just that. Whom am I to believe, them or Cenk? Oh yes, Cenk of course. Why not take his word. It's not like his family is going to be evaporated if he is wrong, right?
OptimisticLock 4 months ago
@OptimisticLock Except they haven't threatened to "kill us all". Hello?
rencrow 4 months ago
It's all about oil; why doesn't America push for war against North Korea, by far a much more volatile nation than Iran? Because:
a) They have no oil.
b) China would rinse them if that happened.
Iran have no real allies who would be prepared to defend it if the situation called, and the real reason; THEY HAVE THAT LOVELY BLACK LIQUID.
PsychosisFire 4 months ago
Americans are stupid and they believe anything and eveything the gov. tells them. Dumb cattle.
gobuddyboy 4 months ago 5
well said I always thought this guy was full of shit.. but now I see he his a smart man. thumbs up!
RickyCage1 4 months ago 2
@humanrights85 true that - unfortunately
ISuperLoveMovies 4 months ago
This video is from 2008. The news media and treasoners in the government have been painting Iran unfairly to the American public for few decades now to prepare it to invade Iran. One big terrorist strike done by treasonsers and blamed on Iran and fake Al Qaeda is all that is needed.
ImamAlMehdi 4 months ago
well young Turks you got it wrong they tried to fly it the problem was Russia and China had planes up in moments Iran weapons where ready and it was a bad ideal they had planed to bomb them in 2009 pushed it off till 2010 why they try to make USA do it for them the problem is China owns there ass economically the reason they needed to raise the dept ceiling is because there is not enough cash in America its all in china south America and Israels banks they needed to print more no cash no war
MrJackmehoff1964 4 months ago
Israel never flew over or any were near Iran, whats wrong with you man. the war you are talking about would have started in that very second.
i'm not saying Get yore facts straight, Get your common sense straight.
menysp 5 months ago
Haha NOT in million years in thier dream.
100kidane 5 months ago
It amazes me how much this guy talking in the video doesnt know about geopolitics.
kraglebit 6 months ago
@kraglebit hello mister fuck. if you know better get your camera and speak!
spemux 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@spemux I dont want to. Eat shit and die you fucking faggot.
kraglebit 5 months ago
guy below me is totally right....also the US is the only one who has used an atomic bomb before so they should just shut up
thesteelososick 6 months ago
Countries with nuclear weapons:
USA, UK, Russia, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel & Iran.
I don't see why the american government is bitching about Iran having nukes when there are so many other countries having it including THEMSELVES!
America has attacked Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama etc, in the last 50 years. How many has Iran attacked? NONE.
Now you tell me which country is the real threat to the world.
ISuperLoveMovies 6 months ago 17
@ISuperLoveMovies What the hell is wrong with you? we were not a threat to the world we tried to be the peace keepers but people can't seem to know what peace means... and plus
We did not attack panama we had to rescue Americans at the U.S Embassy Kidnapped from there!
neither did Grenada we had to save U.S Students!!!
Vietnam they pretty much started the war not us they attacked a u.s patrol boat and invaded south vietnam!
Iraq and Afghanistan its pretty OBVIOUS
Eskimo407 5 months ago
@Eskimo407 Peace keepers? US government knew that Al-Qaeda was not in Iraq, yet the went there and know 650'000 civilians have lost their lives.
The US patrol boat that was sent specifically to BE attacked (in North V) (was on spying mission and attacked FIRST) so that the US could get a free hand in starting a war. They did not want South Vietnam to fall into communism because they thought a domino effect would start and the hole region would fall into communism = US has less control over it
ISuperLoveMovies 5 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies Al Qaeda doesnt even exist, there isnt even real proof of it existing. It is all scam, fraud, The Zionists are controlling everything with the US as their puppets.
TheSerbianguy 5 months ago
@TheSerbianguy Whether they exist or not, the US is using as a tool to start wars, which result in millions of deaths. And yes I agree on the Zionist part
ISuperLoveMovies 5 months ago
@Eskimo407 Do you think the only thing they did was to rescue people in Panama? Hey dissolved their defense forces as well as deposing their leader...
as if Grenada just read on Wiki about it
ISuperLoveMovies 5 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies Thats Wiki all the "facts" from that site are not true, read from a real textbook it tells you what really happened, Panama was already in civil war and the government was corrupt might as well help them right? cause we can't just sit there and just watch people die everyday and a country to fall apart. (no argument here)
Eskimo407 5 months ago
@Eskimo407 Just like you cant in the once beautiful places called Iraq, Lybia, Yugoslavia (especially Serbia, no personal reasons though) with their "dictators".
TheSerbianguy 5 months ago
@Eskimo407 Oh mister smarty pants, A us patrol boat in Vietnamese area is the reason to start a war, i dont think so. If i were you i would ask your history teacher *which is also brainwashed maybe* to educate you a bit. Seems that Americans cant handle that MASSIVE AMOUNT of education, WINK WINK. And tell me why Iraq and Afghanistan is pretty obvious? Because you follow the same stereotype set by Zionists and Americans that every single Arab is a Suicide bomber wearing a turban? Oh please.
TheSerbianguy 5 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
maybe if you didn't think like a small child you would be able to understand adult situations.
yes, those countries have nuclear weapons. But you can't just get rid of your nuclear weapons completely all at once. There's something called the balance of power.
And nearly all of those countries that you mentioned that the U.S. attacked were authorized by the people of those countries.
Iran on the other hand has said that it wants to wipe israel off the map.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 the is fact that ahmadinejad DID NOT say that he wants to wipe Israel off the map. That was a deliberate mistranslation. What he said was something like (more or less word by word) that Israels govn't is a bad one and should therefor be deposed and the page be turned so that the people can continue to live their lives better. And with the resent demonstrations you can see that Israelis aren't happy w/ their govn't
Get your facts straight and stop listening to propaganda
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 The fact that you cant get rid of nuclear weapons at once is irrelevant as those countries that have it are keeping it.
Are you seriously suggesting that the the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc authorized the US to attack them? the people authorized it?? was there a voting?? So basically the 600'000 iraqis killed wanted to get killed? Besides it is not the people who decide this kind of matter it's the government.
Your argument is beyond stupid.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"as those countries that have it are keeping it"...
Isn't that PRECISELY my point? Getting rid of OUR nukes, without the rest of the world doing the same will make us extremely militarily weaker.
1. Are you seriously saying the regime under saddam was better than it is now?
2. Are you seriously saying that afghanistan is better under the ruthless regime of the taliban?
3. And you do realize that we were only helping south vietnam defend itself from a northern invasion right?
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 Then if it will make your country militariliy weaker than why shouldn't Iran have nukes when both Israel and the US are clear threats??
if US had the intention of just killing Saddam then why, now 5 years after, are they still there killing people?
If their sole intention was to kill Saddam then they would had done it without slaughtering more than half million Iraqis.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Are you a child? Why do you ask such childish questions? Obviously iran can't have nukes because it will cause an arms race in the region, which could in turn cause an all out nuclear war. And the U.S. and the rest of the nuclear-armed countries are TRYING to all get rid of the nukes together over time.
Why are we still in iraq? Because we are helping the new government become stabilized. The new iraqi government said its a mistake for us to leave(which we are doing)
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
Besides, it just takes a quick goolge to finds some info just google "was iraq better/worse during Saddam" - all those hits on page one (didn't look further) suggest that Iraq is way worse now than under Saddam.... so yeah, not only have you killed more than HALF A MILLION PEOPLE but you have left the country in a worse state than when you came
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
So it is okay for all other countries except iran to have nukes? Iran is being thretend by 2 nuclear countries so of course they are going to try have some in order to defend themselves. Iran will not start a war, and is therefor not a threat to the US or isreal (and therefore they should shut up about Iran having nukes since they pose a bigger threat to the world since the US start wars as a hobby). Anyone who things Iran will make the first move is beyond stupid.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
You're idiotic mind still can't comprehend the situation with iran.
We can't help the fact that countries ALREADY have nukes, except for the fact that we are dramatically lowering our stockpiles. But what we CAN'T have is NEW countries obtaining nukes, because it will start an arms race. What part of this do you not understand?
Why is iran being threatened? BECAUSE OF THEIR NUCLEAR PROGRAM YOU IDIOT.
Iran won't start a war? Maybe. but they WILL invade their surroundings.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
what don't you understand when I say 2 countries that are aggressively against iran have nukes and could very well use it. Don't you think the country feels threatened by that? And you can't help the fact that you already have nukes? then what the hell were you thinking in the first place when you obtained it?? to late for regretting that but you started rolling the ball. If the US stopped their propaganda and threats against iran, Iran would no have a reason to get nukes.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
What the fuck are you talking about in your last message? I never said we aren't aggressive towards iran. But the ONLY reason we are is because they are making nukes. Do you really think we would think about attacking iran if they weren't making nukes?
I have already told you that we CAN'T help the fact that we already have nukes, because getting rid of them all at once would be deadly. We have brought down our stockpiles by 80% though.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
Iran having nukes is none of the US business + they are saying that they aren't making weapons.... I'm not saying it's true, but who are they (the US) to say who gets to have what when numerous other countries have it as well. and don't come with the shit that they are getting rid of it, i don't care. They have it and they can use it
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
continued-
"but who are they (the US) to say who gets to have what when numerous other countries have it as well"
OH...MY....GOD...
I have already showed you why new countries can't have nukes. And i have already told you that all countries are seeking to get rid of nukes. You just can't do it over night.
How does getting rid of nukes not matter to what we are talking about? do you know what an arms race is? No countries in the middle east want iran to have nukes. NONE
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
What's the point of the video, there are countless videos with americans saying and arguing if the should attack iran + them creating war propaganda (i'm sure you know that the US is talking about starting a war anyhow..)
/watch?v=FtSmEYQYhaI
/watch?v=fjP816VwhJE&feature=related
watch?v=_HrqZXtWMLs&feature=related
Maybe off topic, still:
/watch?v=xNeT7eNIdDo
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
In all of those videos it shows Americans talking about a DEFENSIVE strategy to attack iran's nuclear plants.I don't understand how YOU don't understand that iran with nuclear weapons won't be good for the world at all.
I can't believe that you ACTUALLY have to dupe so low as to saying you speak persian. Again, you're not fooling anyone, only making yourself look extremely desperate and stupid.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
YOU IDIOT.
"In (=this) regime (regime) eshghalgar-e qods (=(refering to) Jerusalem) bayad (=must) az (=from) safheye (=the page of) rozegar (=days --> (referring to) time) mahv shavad (= be removed)
He is referring to the regime not the country and its people
And wipe off or anything like it is not a correct translation because their is no such idiom in persian as "wiping something off the map"
just ask a persian speaking person showing him the clip, what he said...
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
U mad???? Yeah, i think you're mad.
First of all, anyone can find an online translator. Don't think you're fooling anyone into believing you speak persian you clown.
Secondly, i think i'll take the analysis of a international translator over what you got from an online translator.
And even IF he was referring to the regime(which he wasn't) that still is insinuating that he wants to WIPE israel away, which is still an utterly obvious sign of provocation.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
I can show you on skype that I speak Persian. plane and simple. unless you "don't add ppl" there.
US is a stooge of Israel.
The US -SUSPECTS- that Iran is constructing nuclear weapons, they don't know it for a fact.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Are you SERIOUS? You're even more deluded than i thought if you're ACTUALLY trying to imply that iran isn't constructing nuclear weapons. First off, it's not the U.S. that is saying they're building nukes, it's the ENTIRE UN. I can send you source after source proving they are indeed building nukes.
And the difference between the U.S. being behind 9/11 and iran building nukes is that one claim has an overwhelming amount of proof on its side, the other doesn't.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351 I haven't stated that I don't believe that Iran is constructing nuclear weapons.
ok, send me reliable sources that show proof (100%) that Iran is making nuclear weapons and not using it for peaceful proposes. I'm not saying there aren't any.
It's beyond me that you actually believe that fabricated story.
Yeah right use that as an excuse. Funny how you think I'm trying to "fool" you into that I speak Persian. Like that's my goal: fool ppl on the internet that I speak a language
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Don't even try to act like you didn't IMPLY that iran isn't constructing nuclear weapons. You clearly did. You even compared it to the accusation of the U.S. government orchestrating 9/11 which has no basis in reality whatsoever.
Sure, you just HAPPEN to say that you speak persian in an argument about the translation of persian words. HOW CONVENIENT. Again, you're not the first person to falsely claim things over the internet.
I will be sending you sources.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
Ahmadinejad says the US was behind 9/11 just like the US says Iran is constructing nuclear weapons, or blaming Iran for being behind a ridiculous "saudi ambassador plot".
It's not like the US is telling the entire truth about 9/11 anyhow, they don't even mention Saudi Arabia. I don't think the US was behind 9/11 though.
Although they have planed similar things before like operation northwoods.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
continued-
There is also a plethora of proof that iran was behind the ambassador plots. This is besides the fact that it is well known that the perpetrator who was caught has well known ties to the iranian government.
Also, i don't have skype, but if i did, im pretty sure i could fake a language while online too. Again, you're NOT fooling anyone.
Operation northwoods was denied action by the U.S. government, so that has no basis in reality whatsoever.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
I have NEVER stated that I don't think Iran is constructing nuclear weapons..
When I compared it with those stuff it was because none of those are facts, just assumptions.
My parents are Iranian born so again yes I do speak persian. Yeah try faking Persian and see how well you would do
Haha, it has no basis in reality? all documents are on public domain etc. You only believe things that boost your ego and look past everything else. It was denied? Iran denies having nukes.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Why are you being ridiculous? This is what you said-
"The US -SUSPECTS- that Iran is constructing nuclear weapons, they don't know it for a fact"
First of all, you're wrong, because it's not the US, it's the entire IAEA.
Secondly that statement DIRECTLY implies that you think iran isn't building nukes, and that it's only the U.S. that's CLAIMING it.
And again, you can pretend you speak persian all you want, but Y.O.U. A.R.E. N.O.T. F.O.O.L.I.N.G. M.E.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
that is not "directly" imping that I think it's building nukes when I write what the US is suspecting, you idiot.
Again, it takes 2 sec to get a skype account, what are you afraid of. Secondly, if I don't speak persian then you are not speaking english but using various sources to write here, lol.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies When you say that the U.S. is solely "suspecting" that iran is building nukes, you make it sound like some big scheme that the u.s. is pulling to attack iran, which implies that you don't think iran is building nukes. Don't even try to argue against this, because it is blatantly obvious.
When i started typing in English, language wasn't the issue, but YOU miraculously announced you speak persian that just HAPPENS to be in an argument about Persian translation.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
However you interpret shit I don't care, because I never stated it and I didn't mean what you are making up.
I gave you evidence of the same thing I was trying to tell you, making me speaking Persian irrelevant.
I like to see you try to speak persian and see if you can "fake" it convincingly, when it doesn't even use a Latin alphabet.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Whatever. We both know that you insinuated that iran isn't building nukes, and that its only the U.S. lying about them. This is out in the open, and anyone reading our comments will understand this.
I speak 35 different languages by the way. ;)
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
I already told you that I believe that Iran is building nukes.
I speak 3 languages and a LITTLE Spanish. :D At least i'm not kidding.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Wow. please don't even try to cover up what is well known. I have already proven to you that you insinuated that it was a lie from the U.S. saying iran was building nukes and that we "don't have proof".
And then you come back(after i send you proof) and say that you were saying they are building nukes all along.
Whoever said i was kidding about speaking 35 languages? I also have 7 PhD's.
;)
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
I've said that the US claims that Iran is building nukes.
I've never stated that Iran isn't building nukes, so don't try to put words in my mouth.
yeah well.... if you had 7 phd's you probably wouldn't be sitting on youtube wasting your life arguing with me :)
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Wow. i can't believe you're ACTUALLY still trying to cover up what you meant. It's ok, we all make mistakes...
You didn't say iran is building nukes, you said America SPECULATES that iran is building nukes, which DIRECTLY implies that it's merely us making up lies about iran. You even said that the claim isn't backed up by facts, that is until i proved your wrong.
I stay on youtube because im a multi-billionaire who does whatever i want all day.
;)
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
since I didn't write it why are you making up that I wrote it? if you interpret things different from what is said it's not my problem. The site you gave me said that there was evidence, but it didn't give any. This is like Iraq when they said that it had wmd.
ok good for you.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
What are you trying to say that you didn't write? You DID write "America SPECULATES that iran is building nukes". Are you denying you wrote that?
Everything else i said you IMPLIED or INSINUATED, which you clearly did.
The IAEA and UN have reported that they ARE going to release the information next week. When they do, im going to send you a big "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA"
personal message...I can't wait....
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
I wrote that america speculates that iran is building nukes. I haven't written that Iran isn't.
Now continue to say that I implied something else.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
WOW. again, everyone reading these comments will clearly see that you implied that it was just America making it up. You even said that it is equivalent to America saying iran was behind the saudi assassination attempt-which they were, and there's proof-
There is no hiding this kind of mistake.
You will only embarrass yourself even further if you continue acting like you never did it.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
Everyone reading will see that I have never written or stated that I believe that iran wasn't behind it.
Why would Iran want to assassinate a saudi guy in the US using a sloppy guy through the Mexican drugcartel (why would even they do it), when there are plenty of saudis near Iran. + why are the interrogation recordings of the guy suddenly gone? + what would Iran's government gain from this
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
How can you say that you never said iran wasn't behind the assassination plot, and then RIGHT after that say that you think it's improbable that iran was behind the assassination plot?
And by the way, you compared America "claiming" iran had nukes to iran claiming america was behind 911. THERE YOU GO. THAT IS A CLEAR IMPLICATION.
And the guy who was caught had KNOWN ties to high iranian military officials. There is no hiding this anymore, there is way too much proof.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
When I wrote "t I have never written or stated that I believe that Iran wasn't behind it" I was talking about nukes not the assassination plot.
Saying something does not make it a fact. When Ahmadinejad claimed america may be behind 9/11 it does not make it a fact and vice versa.
The US officials have not offered any specific evidence linking the "plot" to Iran's leaders, which the US claim they knew. The 100 000 $ wasn't even transacted from Iran. Total groundless accusation
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"that iran wasn't behind it"
Really? That doesn't sound like you're talking about nukes. That clearly implies you were talking about the assasination plot.
Your words about words "not meaning anything" makes no sense whatsoever.
There is PROOF from an INTERNATIONAL institution that iran is building nukes. There is NO proof that the U.S. was behind 9/11 on the other hand.
Wasn't transacted from iran? LOLOL that's your proof? WOW. Im speechless.
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
Instead of threatening Iran there are numerous other countries that they could threat. Including the US which pose the biggest threat. Iran is not going to use any nukes unless the US or Israel attack them. idiot.
they will invade their surroundings? haha, you're the biggest idiot ever. Iran won't to shit outside of their country.
The US does the invading in this world. Iran hasn't invaded a country for hundreds of years.
Stop listening to propaganda your government feeds you
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"there are numerous other countries that they could threat"
There is no other country out there this is trying to get nukes that also threatens to destroy one of our strongest allies. What you said is once again false.
How can you say iran wouldn't attack israel, when they have said over and over again that that's exactly what they want to do? For christ's sake, hezbollah(funded by iran) has a fucking mushroom cloud as it's symbol.
Stop listening to ridiculous conspiracies
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
iwhen has iran threatened to destroy israel?? you are just an outcome of your countries propaganda. Iran did not say that they would destroy or "wipe israel of the map". i pity you for being so dumb. What they said was that Israels government is a bad one and should therefore be deposed. Ahmadinejad did NOT say that he/iran would attack them or ANYTHING like that .wtf in that isn't it that you don't understand.
+ iran hasn't attack any cnty in 100yrs unlike US+Isr
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
When has iran threatened to destroy israel??? SERIOUSLY? Not only do they constantly talk about how israel is evil and needs to be wiped clean, but their own organization Hezbollah routinely shells gaza. I can give you countles urls showing iran saying they want israel off the map from SEVERAL translators. So don't even try to act like they never said that.. They aslo have routine demonstrations of destroying israel-
/watch?v=VZIp0BIRUJs
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 I HAVE TOLD YOU THAT THAT WAS A DELIBERATE MISTRANSLATION. what is it that you don't udnerstand.
I FUCKING SPEAK PERSIAN AND HE DOES NOT SAY IT, jesus. what he says is that israels government is a bad one and should therefor be deposed. He did not say ANYTHING about that he/iran is going to do shit.
He has though on multiple occasions said that iran does not have any intentions of starting a war.
Isreal on the other hand is constantly trying to get US to start one.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
First of all, you're not fooling anyone when you say that you speak persian. You're not the first person to have claimed that you can do something over the internet. By the way, i speak every language in the world. ;)
I'm pretty sure it would have been big news if Ahmadinejad was taken out of context, being that his translated speech was broadcasted in America and everywhere else, where ther are plenty of persian-speaking individuals. And did you not see that video i posted?
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
you can continue to be ignorant and believe everything your government tells you i couldn't care less.
Google "ahmadinejad translation controversy" on wikipedia and then go to translation controversy, you can read about there as well.
And yes I DO speak Persian.
And no it would not be big news because that his how your country brainwashes people like you. people do not speak as loud as a government does through media.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
continued-
"All official translations of Mr. Ahmadinejad's statement, including a description of it on his website, refer to wiping Israel away. Sohrab Mahdavi, one of Iran’s most prominent translators, and Siamak Namazi, managing director of a Tehran consulting firm, who is bilingual, both say “wipe off” or “wipe away” is more accurate than "vanish" because the Persian verb is active and transitive."
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@andrewm153351
At a news conference, Ahmadinejad stated his speech had been exaggerated and misinterpreted. "There is no new policy, they created a lot of hue and cry over that. It is clear what we say: Let the Palestinians participate in free elections and they will say what they want." Speaking at a D-8 summit meeting in July 2008, he denied that his country would ever instigate military action. Instead he claimed that "the Zionist regime" in Israel would eventually collapse on its own.
ISuperLoveMovies 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
continued-
Well of course he would say this AFTER his comments caused an uproar.
Again, it's quite odd how iran's puppet army(Hezbollah) has a mushroom cloud as their symbol....quite odd....
You keep talking about how he denies this, and he denies that. Remember this is the man who is BLATANTLY constructing nuclear weapons, and then saying that he isn't. he also says that 9/11 was orchestrated by the U.S. government....
andrewm153351 2 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
continued-
It doesn't MATTER if iran hasn't attacked anyone. The fact remains that they do not want israel in the middleeast. This is purely fact.
Iran having nukes is none of our business? Do you understand how childish that sounds? It matters to the WHOLE WORLD if a threatening country is trying to obtain nukes.
Don't even try to act like iran isn't making nukes. I can send url after url after url showing this to be demonstrably untrue.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
Ahmadinejad has said that there should be a voting there in palestine to see what they want, since Israel just came out of nowhere and claimed the land that belonged to palestien. He said that there should be a voting about what they want to do and the just f do it.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
NV did invade SV, but what does the US have to do with it. They should stop being so nosy and mind their own business and stop interfering in peoples (countries) affairs because they only make things worse.
I know charlie or whatever his name was was sent to prison. It doesn't change the fact the US soldiers were behind those atrocities
And I know the vietnam war began before the gulf of tonkin incident that is why i wrote ONGOING war.... so the fail is on your part.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"NV did invade SV, but what does the US have to do with it"
YOU FUCKING IDIOT.
The U.S. was ALLIES with south vietnam. I don't know about you, but America doesn't like to run out from it's allies. You're completely downplaying the fact that NV ruthlessly invaded the south, killing thousands of innocent civilians, before we ever even intervened.
And you can't blame the U.S. military if the people who perpetrated the acts were sent to prison. That is completely childish
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"that is why i wrote ONGOING war"
This makes absolutely no sense.
The U.S. already had plenty of jurisdiction to intervene before the gulf of tonkin, being that SV was a strong military ally. Your argument is flawed from the start.
And let me point out to you AGAIN that saddam killed nearly 2 million people. The fact that you think the U.S. killed more is astoundingly stupid.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
give me a source to that south vietnam and the US were allies before the us staging the gulf of toking incident and then going into the war.
The US just didn't want SV to become communist because of what I have already previously stated twice.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"give me a source to that south vietnam and teh US were allies before the us stagint the gulf of tonkin incident"
You idiot. We were allies with SV since theState of Vietnam referendum, 1955. Go and google it. During the cold war, the soviet union became allies with the north, and we became allies with the south.
This shows how little you know about history.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
Anyhow, I don't give a shit about what your opinion is on what. A take it you're an american so you're just going to be biased consciously or unconsciously and not believe anything that goes against your beliefs, so I see no reason to continue arguing
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
You really fit the american stereotype. A complete idiot.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Again, saddam killed at the very least several hundred thousand of his own civilians.
And the very highest estimate according to Iraq's own body count shows that around 112,000 iraqis have died in the iraq war.
And a HUGE part of this that ou don't understand is that over 3/4ths of those civilian deaths in the iraq war were from IRAQI'S THEMSELVES. Ever heard of suicide bombings?
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 They've been in Afghanistan for 10 years now and they say that they are half done. The only thing they're doing there is to kill people and get their own men killed. Besides how big of a threat is the taliban to the US? What's going on in each country and what govt they have shouldn't lead to another count starting a war against thm
The US attacked NV because they thought that if SV would fall into communism nearby countries would do so as well, like the so called "domino effect"
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
continued-
You still have not answered my questions about the taliban and the saddam regime. You clearly don't know the history of these two powers. "how big of a threat is the taliban to the US?" WOW. This shows how ignorant you are.
You are totally misconstruing what happened in the vietnam war.
North vietnam invaded south vietnam FIRST. We then went in to help south vietnam fight off north vietnam. That is all that happened.
You sir, need to brush up on your history.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 The US got involved in the ongoing Vietnam war because they didn't want SV to fall into communism (since they thought if they did, the whole S.E asia would follow and become communist) so they staged the gulf of tonkin incident were they interfered with NV radio signals in order to get NV to attack them. They then used this as a reason to go into the war. Their official reason to help SV etc, can be crushed with the My Lai massacre were the US soldiers killed HUNDREDS of civilians
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
You still have not acknowledged the fact that it was North vietnam that ruthlessly invaded and attacked south vietnam.
South Vietnam was already an ally for the U.S., so you can't possibly not understand why we would go fight. Unless you are blindly stupid, which im beginning to think is the case.
You do know that the soldiers who orchestrated the my lai massacre were arrested and sent to prison?
BTW the vietnam war began long before the gulf of tonkin incident.
Fail.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 add me so that I can send you a message instead of writing here. the word limit is crazy
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
If i can write to you in 500 characters or less, you can do the same.
I don't add friends.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
The US has no right to start a war and kill hundreds of thousands of people, no matter their government.
The reason why the US started the Iraq war was because Saddam was going to start sell his oil in Euro rather than dollars, which would mean major blow for the US dollar.
The thing about Saddam is when he was alive he killed people. Now the US has taken his role and kill people (iraqis). so no I do not think it's better without him because the US has killed more.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"The u.s. has no right to start a war"
Actually they had every right in the books according to the U.N. And last time i checked, it wasn't just the U.S. that was involved in all of these wars.
And your wrong YET AGAIN about the U.S. killing more civilians than saddam. Saddam was known to have killed almost 2 million of his own people. And keep in mind that many of the civilians killed in the U.S.-iraq war were from suicide bombings from terrorists.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351 You seem to have completely shunned the fact that iraq was better during saddams rule than what the US has done with the country.
Okay so the US can start bombing and attacking every country in the world because the UN allows countries to go to war. How good we have the us to make peace by bombing and killing people.
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
Stunned that iraq was better during saddams rule? I have already proven this wrong, so i don't know what you're talking about. And the fact that there was more CIVIL peace during saddam's regime was because of his ruthlessnes. He would murder you if you were an opposing party let alone a terrorist.
You REALLY think that the only thing the US does is bomb and kill civilians? You do realize that our government give more foreign aid by FAR than any other country right?
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
The iraq war started because not only the US intelligence agencies, but french, german and uk intelligence agencies all had concluded that saddam had WMD's. Yes, they were wrong, but that is nonetheless how the war started. What does france, germany and the uk have to do with the U.S. dollar? Do you see how flawed your statement is? And why did all of the iraqis tear down saddam's statues and posters after we invaded? Was that all some big conspiracy?
andrewm153351 3 months ago
@andrewm153351
Just because someone says something does not make it true. aren't people told that like in first grade.
I seriously doubt that the US government ATTACKED another country based on information they were given from other countries.
Maybe they tear down Saddams statue because he killed his own people????? I haven't said that his people liked him, absolutley not, what I say is that the country was better before the US invasion
ISuperLoveMovies 3 months ago
@ISuperLoveMovies
"i seriously doubt the US government ATTACKED another contry based on infromation they were given from other countries"
Well that's where you're wrong(yet again). It is plain fact that the french and german intelligence agencies discovered that saddam was getting ready to stockpile WMD's. In fact, they were hesitant to tell the American government because they knew we would act quickly on it.
These are all documented facts.
andrewm153351 3 months ago
Thick guy got lucky with atv career... no content at all and no personality
brattslapper 6 months ago
Israel fear Iran because Iran is a jihadist state. Israel does not know the answer to this question: do jihadist states fear Mutually Assured Destruction?
BrandonSchleifer 6 months ago
New york? Muslims are going to attack new york? Why? Why? Hmmmm
GreatThunder1 6 months ago
iran hasnt invaded another country in 300 years....just facts
fallenempireoverdrve 6 months ago
Isreal is been taken into protection due to the occourance of Hitlers WW2...GET OVER IT GUY...look what their doing to Palestine and the other Middle Eastern Nations
daHORRORTABI 6 months ago
Comment removed
matro1991 6 months ago
@machoverspeed ...especially considering we don't have solid proof of the nukes they have. Much like the WMDs we recovered in Iraq.....oh....nm we didn't find any yet we managed to fuck up Iraq more than it was during Saddam's regime and built ourselves an infinite enemy. Trust me as much as the news wants you to think that extreme religions exist in the millions, they don't. There are more Shi'ite in Iran who would be against extremist thinking and that is why nothing can happen.
mackayash 6 months ago
@machoverspeed I am not saying Iran has a good agenda, that's doubtful actually, and lets say for a minute that its true they want to force religion on everyone, you honestly think they can succeed? lol. Do you think its Iran on one side and the U.S. on the other side and everyone else on the sidelines will just give in? seriously? I don't doubt Iran has nukes but when US and Israel most likely has 20 fold as many, we have no right to ask them to disengage from the nuke business.
mackayash 6 months ago
@machoverspeed Show me this please. Show me Iranians demanding everyone join Islam please. Just because CNN or FOX paints an image for you doesn't mean the paint is permanent. This has nothing to do with Theocracy, has nothing to do with ethnicity or authority, not for us and not for Israel. This is a conflict of interest and Iran just doesn't wanna play along with Israel, and seeing how much Israeli dick we suck we just do whatever the hell Israel wants us to do.
mackayash 6 months ago
@machoverspeed Perhaps its your supremacist thinking that's the disease here.
mackayash 6 months ago
@machoverspeed I love how I'm getting accused of being a Liberal when you know shit all about me. My point was that considering Israel, who also in your lifetime, has broken every international law possible and always acts like its above the law, I'll take my chances with Iran who hardly has a record over Israel. I'm not saying Iran is a saint but who the fuck is Israel and the who the fuck are we to be asking them to halt nuclear production when we do it?
mackayash 6 months ago
@machoverspeed "Yeah but, Israel ain't likely to nuke Ft. Worth, are they?"
Lets get real here, when was the last time anyone fired a nuke? exactly...Just because the news makes out that Iran is a rogue state doesn't mean they are fuckin insane, they know if they fire a nuke they start WWIII and they eat it big time. And based on the last 60 years of history alone, Israel has committed more atrocities than we've heard the word Iran, so to be honest I'm more worried about Israel's nukes.
mackayash 6 months ago
jews are using these stupid americans
amir105 6 months ago
Iran has nukes, so it does not matter that Iraq and Afghanistan both have US troops in them
leegeorgeson 7 months ago
Hell of the upside down sinners baby!!
MrPiccolop 7 months ago
if Cenk is turkish, Turkey can't be all bad.
we live in a world where evil shitheads make the decisions and those in the middle east are small fries compared to those running USA.
how many wars are USA running now? 3? 4?
they are really solving some problems
DanFrederiksen 7 months ago
wow, a never thought id agree with a group called "the young turks" , but Cenk killed it on this one. Well said.. Look people, IRAN IS NOT THE PROBLEM, however, the IRANIAN YOUTH NEED YOU. You must provide the YOUTH with the means to democratize their own country! we cant do it through bombs
debateSlayer 7 months ago
@TheYoungTurks Great video, your Americans World policies are threat to World peace. America must get rid of its mega and giga ton nukes, before they preach nuclear free-World. Up Until then, the rest of the World countries must seek protection from mad nation America.
micheal74rich 7 months ago
I know: I love it how everyone is like OMG IRAN HAS NUKES!!! when Israel has nukes that can do laps around the world.
mackayash 7 months ago 38
@mackayash Did israel threaten to wipe out a country? I think not...
watchnsw 6 months ago
@watchnsw They didn't threaten they went ahead and did it with Palestine.
mackayash 6 months ago
@mackayash They never threatened them with nukes.... they attacked them when they started launching rockets at the civilian population in israel.
watchnsw 6 months ago
@watchnsw lol you pro-zionists amaze me, since when did Iran threaten to wipe a country off? every Farsi prof in the effing globe will tell you all the News network are BSing and the President of Iran never said anything of that sort. Meanwhile, Israel had ALREADY wiped a country off the map, I mean you can barely see anything that says Palestine there in most maps. So you pathetic fails right in your face.
matro1991 6 months ago
@matro1991 Lololololol that was israel responding to attacks on it hence the 6 day war....and there no such thing as "palestine" please show me it on a map.
watchnsw 6 months ago
@watchnsw I just told you there is NO Palestine on the map because Israel WIPED it off the map. So who are they to claim someone else has supposedly called for their destruction when every Farsi speaking person that has listen to the tapes said otherwise?
matro1991 6 months ago
@matro1991 Are you high? THERE WAS NEVER A PALESTINE.
watchnsw 6 months ago
@watchnsw Continue to deny, but know this; Once we Muslims form our Caliphate, and we will, Palestine will be free, with full force.
matro1991 6 months ago
@matro1991 Nigga please....don't go 1967 on me, you tried that already, and you failed.
watchnsw 6 months ago