I seen one plane, in a camera It went thru other side of a building and another biulding thsi side of it. Before it hit the 2nd tower. SOOO that cannot be Camera manipulation.
amatures making these oulandish claims. you could take 2 pictures from 2 spots 10 feet apart and get 2 different out comes. lighting, angle, material object is made of, all contribute into how the image is going to turn out.
Whilst I believe that 9/11 was an inside job there are some major flaws in your argument. The comparisons may be from same direction but are of different elevations such that your 'orb' appears to have a different profile to your plane because they are cast across different tonal backgrounds. In reality it's the same object. Only one is silhouetted against the sky. Cheers for wasting my time.
There have been hundreds of eyewitnesses that came fourth and said they saw the 2nd plane hit and I WAS WATCHING IT LIVE on CBS with Dan Rather and SAW the 2nd plane hit!
ok people lets put this in perspective.Cameras are NOT ALWAYS accurate.When i was in london once i took a picture of the london eye on a digital camera.When the actual photo was taken the london eye had disappered from the shot.Everything else was in the shot that should be.But the london eye itself was not visible.According to the theory in this video then i guess the london eye is fake but we know logically that is not the case.The phrase the camera doesnt lie is a lie in itself
lol you folks are fucking dumbasses...I was THERE when the second plane hit. I saw the fucking plane coming from far off, and totally clearly went through. You guys are so ridiculous
I thought so too, but if you keep watching when they compare the angles of the building there was no space between the two. What your seeing is the sunlight reflecting off one side illuminating that space.
first off- the 2 different views are from different elevations- and 2 differnt buildings. Contact those 2 different media sources and google their locations and elevation and you'll see the perspective change. the one that "didnt" show the airplane and showed an "orb" was due to the fact that the sun reflected off at a different angle that made it more difficult to see. (FYI my brother in law's best friend died in the second plane. he was a pilot.)
ANYONE THAT WAS THERE. THAT SAW THAT FF...2ND PLANE HIT. TELL ME IT WAS THERE...A 2ND PLANE PLEASE TELL ME IT WAS THERE.....it would have all been for nothing please a credible eyewitness tell me a 2nd plane hit
Skunkz it looks like u put a lot of effort into this video but there is footage of the plane hitting the wtc by news and people. are u trying to say that those are doctored?
i wouldn't say ALL... but some of us already know that if the "NEWS" came from the corporate media, MOST LIKELY, it'd already been filtered & "DOCTORED". prime example is this video. THERE WAS NO 2ND PLANE.
They are not different trajectories. The videos are zoomed to a different degree from 2 different angles and elevations, the backgrounds being different shows this. And the orb/blurry projectile?, The buildings in the background are pixilated and blurry, the imaging corupted, much like a copy of a copy is never as clear as the original. The plane you 'can't' see is behind the tower in the foreground. The live angle you choose is not the only one just the best one to make fit your theory.
WOW!
proudestmikey 1 year ago
What about the people on the ground that video the 2nd plane themselves?
HughesJD1989 1 year ago 12
I seen one plane, in a camera It went thru other side of a building and another biulding thsi side of it. Before it hit the 2nd tower. SOOO that cannot be Camera manipulation.
johnfox1 1 year ago
good job on this one. very comprehensible.
jazzmaster1972 2 years ago
amatures making these oulandish claims. you could take 2 pictures from 2 spots 10 feet apart and get 2 different out comes. lighting, angle, material object is made of, all contribute into how the image is going to turn out.
zeroflat24 2 years ago 5
Whilst I believe that 9/11 was an inside job there are some major flaws in your argument. The comparisons may be from same direction but are of different elevations such that your 'orb' appears to have a different profile to your plane because they are cast across different tonal backgrounds. In reality it's the same object. Only one is silhouetted against the sky. Cheers for wasting my time.
warlock242 2 years ago 4
There have been hundreds of eyewitnesses that came fourth and said they saw the 2nd plane hit and I WAS WATCHING IT LIVE on CBS with Dan Rather and SAW the 2nd plane hit!
jacks1bonnielass 2 years ago
@jacks1bonnielass really...... :)
keulekavlinski 1 year ago
i bet this took you days to make
wrekadizzle 2 years ago
ok people lets put this in perspective.Cameras are NOT ALWAYS accurate.When i was in london once i took a picture of the london eye on a digital camera.When the actual photo was taken the london eye had disappered from the shot.Everything else was in the shot that should be.But the london eye itself was not visible.According to the theory in this video then i guess the london eye is fake but we know logically that is not the case.The phrase the camera doesnt lie is a lie in itself
LoneAxman 2 years ago
@LoneAxman
no, cameras dont lie. they see what they see. it is bad photographers that 9unitentionally) lie.
done it myself.
edslides 1 year ago
US gov is hiding some thing
marileus009 2 years ago 16
I found the truth in the Arrivals. Us gove was planing this event to make it easy to enter to Arab countries.
johnnahir 2 years ago
lol you folks are fucking dumbasses...I was THERE when the second plane hit. I saw the fucking plane coming from far off, and totally clearly went through. You guys are so ridiculous
KrohnIndustry 2 years ago
look inbetween the two tours on the first video, no plane
SkaterPix 2 years ago
I thought so too, but if you keep watching when they compare the angles of the building there was no space between the two. What your seeing is the sunlight reflecting off one side illuminating that space.
yatoihei 2 years ago
first off- the 2 different views are from different elevations- and 2 differnt buildings. Contact those 2 different media sources and google their locations and elevation and you'll see the perspective change. the one that "didnt" show the airplane and showed an "orb" was due to the fact that the sun reflected off at a different angle that made it more difficult to see. (FYI my brother in law's best friend died in the second plane. he was a pilot.)
KheaDan 2 years ago
ANYONE THAT WAS THERE. THAT SAW THAT FF...2ND PLANE HIT. TELL ME IT WAS THERE...A 2ND PLANE PLEASE TELL ME IT WAS THERE.....it would have all been for nothing please a credible eyewitness tell me a 2nd plane hit
utepstudent12 2 years ago
Well Americans murder presidents, so whats the big deal in kill a few houndred pple?
And you still think you are the GOOD guys? come on! open your eyes!
rmonasterios 3 years ago
Skunkz it looks like u put a lot of effort into this video but there is footage of the plane hitting the wtc by news and people. are u trying to say that those are doctored?
blondie12687 3 years ago
these videos were pulled-out from the actual files themselves. UNFILTERED. the LIVE footage, then the EVENING NEWS afterwards. so what do you think?
skunkz01 3 years ago 4
good vid, i can't see the plane either, but there are 42 different videos of the 2nd strike, you think all of them have been manipulated?
DjReplayRemix 3 years ago 9
i wouldn't say ALL... but some of us already know that if the "NEWS" came from the corporate media, MOST LIKELY, it'd already been filtered & "DOCTORED". prime example is this video. THERE WAS NO 2ND PLANE.
skunkz01 3 years ago
good vid!
koekiemonsterogen 3 years ago 4
thanks.
skunkz01 3 years ago
They are not different trajectories. The videos are zoomed to a different degree from 2 different angles and elevations, the backgrounds being different shows this. And the orb/blurry projectile?, The buildings in the background are pixilated and blurry, the imaging corupted, much like a copy of a copy is never as clear as the original. The plane you 'can't' see is behind the tower in the foreground. The live angle you choose is not the only one just the best one to make fit your theory.
MKJM104 3 years ago
bottom-line, the "doctored" videos compared to the original have been tampered with CGI. 'nough said.
skunkz01 3 years ago
Did you actually read my post before commenting?
MKJM104 3 years ago
sorry. mistake on my part. must be the lack of sleep.
skunkz01 3 years ago
very well done,clear.
theonlyreallaz 3 years ago
thanks for your input. much appreciated.
skunkz01 3 years ago