He knows all the future pattern positions plus values from each future card coming on the board. Plus he knows pretty much all statistics and all storylines. I mean my brains can't do mass calculation and memory retrieval. That's a sick Robo Human. Must be an iq of 150 atleast.
@InfoNympho44 AK, AQ, AJ, AT, A7, 89, TJ, A4, KQ, maybe A4 but i don't think so, and also I don't think he would just flat the flop with T7 even though he is in position. Any pocket pairs are out of the question IMO since he just limped the button preflop.
@zamuda I think AK, AQ, AJ, AT, and KQ is out of the question since he just limped the button, which leaves us with A7, A4, JT, and 89, which is a pretty narrow range - Let's say he has one of those hands 50% of the time, and air/worse than top pair the other 50%. This means that if Eric sees it that way he has to call, and that's why it isn't a great bluff, eventhough it worked.
@InfoNympho44 well it all comes down to the range you think ivey would limp the button with. I thinks it is wider and closer to what i have written before.
@TacoMaster07 Uhm, actually, the commentator is right. Phil loves playing pots, especially short handed, he limps from the button, and he is known to be aggressive with anything.
@tgjdlc Ivey isn't value betting anything that is weaker than a pair of aces. He also wouldnt value bet an ace if his kicker was weak, therefore my statement is true.
He does like to play a lot of flops but what hand can he have to play the way he did and that erik can beat?
He would have to float check raise and then fire two barells with complete air (which isn't all that likely) in order that erik could have the best hand - which is exactly what he did :)
@TacoMaster07 I noticed that, no way will phil raise 40K on the turn and 80K on the river with a hand less than top pair so it was either that he was beat or it was a bluff. Phil does like to play a lot of hands but wont usually make big raises like that unless he thinks he can get value for a good hand or can bluff his opponent out the pot.
That was nice
bestpokercoach 4 months ago
Problem with this hand is check raising with A6o on a flop of AT7 rainbow
pretty sure thats one of the most dry boards, so check raising seems very fishy...
SamLYuan 5 months ago
He knows all the future pattern positions plus values from each future card coming on the board. Plus he knows pretty much all statistics and all storylines. I mean my brains can't do mass calculation and memory retrieval. That's a sick Robo Human. Must be an iq of 150 atleast.
TheWayshowerTube 5 months ago
wtf is ivey trying to rep? 89? T7?JT?
InfoNympho44 8 months ago
@InfoNympho44 AK, AQ, AJ, AT, A7, 89, TJ, A4, KQ, maybe A4 but i don't think so, and also I don't think he would just flat the flop with T7 even though he is in position. Any pocket pairs are out of the question IMO since he just limped the button preflop.
zamuda 8 months ago
@zamuda I think AK, AQ, AJ, AT, and KQ is out of the question since he just limped the button, which leaves us with A7, A4, JT, and 89, which is a pretty narrow range - Let's say he has one of those hands 50% of the time, and air/worse than top pair the other 50%. This means that if Eric sees it that way he has to call, and that's why it isn't a great bluff, eventhough it worked.
InfoNympho44 8 months ago
@InfoNympho44 well it all comes down to the range you think ivey would limp the button with. I thinks it is wider and closer to what i have written before.
zamuda 8 months ago
phil gordon is such an idiot
28jzilla 9 months ago
69 is the only hand that eric can beat and thats kinda a long shot
FreakyGirl3333 9 months ago
nice boobs in Lindgren's top left
joyqiq 9 months ago 4
Stupid..for me i will call and raise. why so scare. Waste the chance already. Scare to play Poker then don't gamble.
wpkdenny1977 9 months ago
thats why he is the best, he play with all the cards, not with his cards...
joesnyder7 9 months ago
funny commentator "there are a lot of hands eric can beat" lol is he stupid erik can't beat anything but a bluff
TacoMaster07 1 year ago 11
@TacoMaster07 Uhm, actually, the commentator is right. Phil loves playing pots, especially short handed, he limps from the button, and he is known to be aggressive with anything.
tgjdlc 1 year ago
@tgjdlc Ivey isn't value betting anything that is weaker than a pair of aces. He also wouldnt value bet an ace if his kicker was weak, therefore my statement is true.
TacoMaster07 11 months ago
Comment removed
zamuda 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He does like to play a lot of flops but what hand can he have to play the way he did and that erik can beat?
He would have to float check raise and then fire two barells with complete air (which isn't all that likely) in order that erik could have the best hand - which is exactly what he did :)
zamuda 8 months ago
@TacoMaster07 I noticed that, no way will phil raise 40K on the turn and 80K on the river with a hand less than top pair so it was either that he was beat or it was a bluff. Phil does like to play a lot of hands but wont usually make big raises like that unless he thinks he can get value for a good hand or can bluff his opponent out the pot.
sean19922k7 11 months ago
@TacoMaster07 he can beat any pair
rozzaZEninja 10 months ago
@TacoMaster07 he can beat any par or high card on the table ...
arcaniser 9 months ago
@TacoMaster07 dumbass phil gordon
the3bigreddevils 9 months ago
phil ivey never, ever, ever shows his cards for free.
donmajikjuan 1 year ago 9
ahahahahahahhahaha
ForTu9102 1 year ago