Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,099)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How can you have an adult conversation with a Dogmatist that wants to butcher Medicare?

  • Paul Ryan for King.

  • Typical democrats making republicans look like that they want to take out the senior citizens.

  • Blabbermouth Shultz is a delusional idiot !

  • There is no debating with anyone with a hyphenated last name.

  • She's an idiot. Just a bitter shitfaced douche nozzle.

  • LadybugsTX. Thats not true. It's not that she doesn't have a clue what the American people want, it's that she just does not care. You are right about one thing...she IS an idiot.

  • Trying to sweep it under the rug? but she just mentioned that he was touring around the country to promote it. That's Debbie Shultz logic for you

  • wtf is wrong with her voice, is she drunk?

  • stupid progressive cunt, we'd be better off gassing them all so that the adults can take over

  • F**king LeftWing Ho !

  • Paul Ryan is the shit!!!

  • What a lovely married couple =D

  • The problem isn't really Debbie, it's CNN.

    People in this country are uneducated about our fiscal crisis because our 24 hour news agencies can't spare more than three goddamned fucking minutes to let our leaders talk about social security and medicare!

    I bet Wolf's next story was about some Hollywood trollop getting pulled over for a DUI.

  • I cant stand that witch!! Sen. Ryan you are awesome!

  • Schultz keeps saying he wants to take everyone's SS money and invest it in the stock market. That is a LIE!! He wants to give citizens the option of investing their SS money in the stock market. Big difference. This also includes Bond funds, she wants you to think it's nothing but high risk stock plays.

  • like two children fighting over which of them deserves the piece of cake

  • Blitzer wants to bear Wasserman's child.

  • She can't make extended eye contact, one of the hallmarks of a liar.

  • @Tcorps79 That's her skin. She's from another planet. The suit is a disguise to hide that.

  • This video lacks substance. Notice both politicians dont really say anything which can be confirmed nor denied. Expert bullshit artist liars. The both of them.

  • @qualityrkc I'd disagree with that statement. Paul Ryan eludes to his budget plan to make those programs solvent. You can easily find the plans online and confirm what he is saying is true. Or at least that in his mind he has put down a plan that he thinks will make the programs solvent.

  • @blrohm Who wrote Paul Ryans plan?

  • @qualityrkc Oh I'm sure you have some kind of conspiracy theory, private interest group that had the bill waiting in a desk drawer until he asked for it, right?

  • @blrohm HAHA you don't even know who wrote the plan! Nice deflection tho! It would have taken a normal person 2 seconds to do that research and instead you just try to insult me! You are a perfect example of a modern day republican! Old man doesnt even know how to use a computer!

  • @qualityrkc First of all dickhead, I'm 30. Second I'm not a Republican. So why don't you tell me who wrote the plan, since I obviously I don't know how to use the computer. And please don't even come with your leftist, tin foil wearing "the Koch brothers did it" bullshit.

  • @blrohm Who wrote the bill dude? Simple question. I just wanna see if you can admit it. Or do you think paul ryan wrote it? Bc he is such an expert economist...

  • Both of these assholes are owned by lobbyists. They are both the problem. We all know that defense spending is the 800 lb gorilla in the room that nobody has the courage to touch bc they are completely owned by war profiteers and wall street bankers. They both voted in favor of detaining us citizens without trial. They are traitors to this country and its people in the most literal sense. Their supporters are also traitors even if they are ignorant to the facts.

  • Paul Ryan and Wasserman Shultz are two completely different politicians. Ryan constantly comes up with new ideas on how to reduce the deficit and discusses real issues where Wasserman Shultz has little to no understanding of any major issue and instead spends her time talking about how bad of a person Mitt Romney is. I'm not a Republican but the contrast is obvious to anyone who isnt drinking the far left kool aid.

  • I think congress needs to do a serious study on the effects of overexposure to sunlight has on people's mental acuity. There is something seriously screwed up with some of the representatives from Florida and California.

  • Sounds like she's trying not to bite her tongue off with all that flip flopping .

  • Excuse me Miss Wasserman but I have worked 34 years and I damn sure dont't have the same plan you do. As a member of Congress you only have to serve 4 years and you get retirement from me a taxpayer for 34 years. I am a DOD employee and would love to get the benefits you get as a member of Congress.

  • This woman is dump as a stump!

  • Please people!! Wake up!! 60.9% of ALL federal spending was spent on social security, medicare, medicade and miscellaneous entitlements like food stamps in 2011... How is that sustainable???

  • @LadybugsTX 60 percent of federal spending being directed towards helping american citizens is not at all unsustainable or crazy. Its sad you think it is.

  • Debbie Wasserman Shultz is an idiot. She doesn't have a clue what the American people want...

  • I cant stand that horseface cunt schultz. She needs her teeth fixed so we can understand what shes saying. Not that it matters.

  • @JawsJaws generations of inbreeding

  • So. Much. Sexual. Tension.

  • That woman is an idiot! LOL

  • How did this woman get elected?! I've seen more intelligent, mature responses in grade school. The dems also elected Hank Johnson from the same area, so I guess this should come as no surprise.

  • WHAT a fücking doüche bag.

  • WHAT a fücking douche bag.

  • WHAT a fucking douche bag.

  • that bitch needs to go back to the kitchen

  • They were kind of brother and sister there. Hahah.

  • No facts to back up the left's claims. None. When government spending goes up, poverty goes up. That is a fact.

  • @mattlouison No, it's really not. 

  • if the excesses are not invested, then they do not generate any sort of a return, which is unfair to the person that could have used his money that was taxed to invest in something that he believed would give some sort of a return.

  • social security is problematic in a fundamental way:

    if social security taxes in excess of payouts to retired people are "invested" in US treasury securities, then basically the "trust fund" is an IOU from the very institution that is supposed to be managing it.

    if the excesses are invested in something other than US treasury securities, then there is an inherent risk that social security was supposed to have been created to protect against.

    cont'd

  • Comment removed

  • republicans answer to everything privatize it and get the kick backs from corporations

  • On the left you have......talking points and on the right.........someone who understands the problem.......who do you want making policy?

  • @kEMCO2 I don't believe that holds true to our entire political spectrum, but it's true in this case, I admit. I'm a liberal, but I respect Ryan's intelligence over that of his opponent in this debate, surely.

  • You can really sense the sexual tension between those two.

  • @Alvord1430 I just threw up a bit in my throat!

  • @Alvord1430  your view of romance is sick and twisted my friend.

  • Typical snotty mouthed Jew. Someone punch her in the face and shut her up.

  • Social Security takes in $7,800 per year per taxpayer. It pays out $3,400 per year at age 55. There's no safety net to pull to begin with - try living off $3,400 per year and see how far you get. There's a better solution. MY PLAN. Check out my profile for more.

  • After the camera gets switched off , they were seen running wildly for a broom closet and having wild hateful zoo-sex!

  • Everything out of her mouth are lies!!!!

  • @lammitom like what?

  • Ryan having ab adult conversation? Impossible.

  • @agentssith why? At least he is trying to save the programs. They will not exist if we continue doing what we're doing and the left has Proposed NOTHING that will save them. They only demogouge and scare people to thinking that republicans want to "hurt" them when the only thing that is guaranteed to hurt EVERYBODY is doing nothing which is exactly what Obama and Democrats are doing. Those are facts. We could have adult conversations if people acknowledged the facts of the situation.

  • @paulfullmer1 Paul Ryan does not want to save anything but his precious top marginal rates. R-tards demagogue themselves, and they deserve every bit of evisceration they get.

  • @agentssith ok... All you did was call names and not even address anything i said, nor did you use any honest facts or logic to support your absurd comments. If we do nothing then these programs will NOT exist in a few years. The President and Democrats have done NOTHING to address the problem, because they're scared to face the reality of the hard situation. Paul Ryan offered a plan, the president- NOTHING. But apparently facts and truth don't matter. I'm so sick of this pure partisan crap.cmon

  • @paulfullmer1 Do you know who 'creates' debt? No, you don't. You probably think that people do when they take out loans, which is only minimally true. Ask yourself why 'loans' are so necessary in the first place. You don't know who creates debt so I will tell you: banks create it. Do you know why? Because debt is no different than money to them. Stop acting like money comes from God® and needs to be repaid or He® will have our heads. You think you can hide it up your @ss?

  • @agentssith well, I have no idea why you went off about where debt comes from. I know how the monetary system works and how horrible inflation is. Tell me just one thing, since you've refused to give me a simple yes or no. If we don't drastically change entitlement programs they will not be around in the near future. yes or no? please answer that simple question. Then at least i'll see if it's worth even trying to have a conversation about anything important at that point.

  • @paulfullmer1 these are safety nets, numbnutz. Not entitlement programs. You have been programmed by your craporate masters. Here is real entitlement program: I am entitled to your home because 1) I lent you other people's (and Fed printed) money and I managed that process and 2) I can create the economic conditions necessary to make you surrender it to me. I can even make you subsidize the surrender! And all the while, my company rewards me handsomely.

  • @agentssith So... yes or no? That's all I want to know.

  • Comment removed

  • @paulfullmer1 if its not obvious why ryan wants to put that money in the stock market then you are in trouble. Wakeup dude. Neither of these fucks care about you.

  • Paul Ryan has some points but his budget didn't touch the military at all. I would be nervous putting social security into the hands off wall street and many like me have paid in for over 30 years. There are no easy answers....

  • Sooo...at what point do Democrats start feeling embarrassed they have Wasserman-Schultz as any kind of liability? It seems everytime I see her she gets owned.

  • Also, doesnt Paul Ryan kind of look like Phoenix Wright?

  • How can those two stand next to each other without one killing the other?

  • I pray I never see him in person. I enjoy my freedom and the right to vote.

  • @MegaDeath1212 Im curious why you associate a person who wants to follow the constitution as a threat to your freedom and right to vote. hmmm. What you should be worried about is bigger and bigger government control... which always ends very badly for everybody. America became the most prosperous and free people in the history of the world in only a few years because of small government and private business and hard work. No other country comes close after thousands of years. Thats amazing.

  • what a fu twat!

  • i live in fl. and i can't beleave anyone would vote for her, but america put bho in office. dumm azzes

  • Schultz is a schill and a tool of the far left nothing Paul could of said would have made any difference. I am a senior citizen and NOT afraid of change as Paul Ryan is proposing. What I am afraid of is doing NOTHING as Dems would do or trying to taxing everyone to death to KEEEEEP spending going no matter what.

  • I would have respect for her ONLY if. She releases her interracial gangbang films.

  • @droldsw31 I agree wholeheartedly. And I think no spending bill should be allowed to pass without a rider requiring Nancy Pelosi to post on YouTube a movie of herself pressing her naked boobs against the window at Nieman Marcus.

  • Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz is not an adult she is an idiot.

  • Will these two just fuck each other and get it over with already?

  • I thought Paul Ryan was a great guy until he defended and voted for the NDAA. Anyone who voted for that is no friend of either the Constitution or liberty. Shame on you Congressman Ryan, shame on you.

  • are u kidding me--- great to look at these pre election videos--- and see who was right----- debbie---- your fired

  • I watch these debates and wonder where the Democrats think the money is going to come from. The economic collapse that is coming because of our inability to get control over our greedy spending today is going to make the depression look like a bad hair day. We are much closer than you think, perhaps less than 10 years at the current deficit spending rate of today. Shame on them for virtually assuring such a painful and difficult future for our children.

  • @idontknow1562 If you care about your kids, teach them about CHRIST, alone

  • @idontknow1562 are you ok with the republicans signing this years ndaa bill? You know the one that allows the government to detain us citizens without trial? Is that helping your kids future the same way taking their social security money and investing it into the stock market would do?

  • my idea of entitlement reform is not to entitle the elite to rob us anymore.

  • @MrMentalflossed No shit!!! Even Ron Paul says the problem is an unfair playing field & that the biggest entitlement program in Washington is for the wealthy! Higher tax rates for the poor & middle class, tax subsidies for Oil companies, Wall Street bail outs, wars making GE, Haliburton & Lockheed filthy rich, over charging by government contractors @ tax payer expense & the list goes on & on & they blame the poor! If Neo-Cons don't like Socialism so much they should quit subsidizing the rich!!!

  • Exactly PiG

  • Its incredible, everytime I hear Paul Ryan speak I think he is smart and articulate and is very good at calculating numbers on the spot. This is all until I actually do some research myself or hear someone on the other side of the aisle intellectually debate him to find out what a fraud he is. Lets also not forget that cut cap and balance provides profit and tax breaks to the farms he and his family owns. Paul Ryan is the epitome of a corrupt politician

  • @319jmp -- Ryan is a complete corporate whore!

  • @DillonDee1 couldnt put it better myself!

  • You American people should vote this low life maggot in the gutter where he belongs , what a full on maggot.

  • these two are screwing eachother lol

  • Saying you want an 'adult conversation' and then rolling your eyes constantly is pretty funny.

  • The socialist in government do not care about the people, but themselves...

  • The top 10% now has 90% of the FINANCIAL WEALTH of the nation.

    This is because many on Wall Street have paid their taxes by the end of January while many in the middle class are working until April to pay off their taxes

    This has resulyed in us having a revenue problem

    Some idiots say that even if you make the top 10% pay their fair share it wont pay off the National debt

    IT WONT IN 1 YEAR, BUT IT WILL OVER TIME -- JUST LIKE WE PAID THE WW2 DEBT BY HAVING A VERY PROGRESSIVE TAX RATE FOR YRS!

  • @DillonDee1 "...if you make the top 10% pay their fair share it wont pay off the National debt..." Forget the deficit, if you confiscated all their wealth, it won't even cover current spending levels. Taxes aren't the problem, its the out of control spending.

  • @tgoyer of course sepndign is out fo control half our money goes to war, and the rest go into the riches pockets,.. corporate welfare,.. the fed,..tax loopholes and tax breaks for the rich,.. how many places does a person have to look at rich people looting before they get the idea that the money is going someplace besides the people. fix that and the rest works just fine.

  • @MrMentalflossed do we as a human race really think the answer for the world is money, war, goverment. what about our creator where is GOD in all of this. truthfully

  • @DillonDee1 You tax earnings yearly and in a world economy when u tax too high and wealth leaves and economic activity shrinks You want more by taking more , but you get less and less over time. Wealth goes where it is most appealing.Your idea will not work. You need to make America a more desirable place to do business and higher taxes will not do it as it keeps people on the sidelines .The problem with socialism is sooner or later you run out of other people's Money - Margret Thatcher.

  • @skinnydude911 -- the European countries that have done the best are those w/ progressive taxation & dont let the super-rich get the best deal.

    Ryan works for those making over $250,000 & is an ASS!

  • @DillonDee1 no, most people don't work for; no one but them self's

  • @MRSIRMATTHEW1 -- go back to school -- your writing is horrible

  • Paul Ryan is a motherfucker

  • Debbie Wasserman-schultz is a PiG.

  • @ArckGabe I beg to differ. Until she opened her mouth, I found her quite bukake-able.

  • Schultz is an idiot. Ryan is trying to have a serious logical discussion on Social Security and Schultz does the usual liberal ranting and somehow is yelling about the stock market...ridiculous. Ryan realizes we need to work with wall street, the arent going anywhere so we might as well work with them.

  • Its not good for the normal people they dont get the inside info. That is what the witch is trying to say.

  • Paul Ryan is just another pretty-faces shill for Wall Street.

  • @TheSpaceanus I'll take that as a no, and just so you know, it isn't that I rejected your ideas, It's that you never expressed them.

  • @TheSpaceanus You want to try and make some sense of that? I would love to see it.

  • people with 2 last names should be murdered

  • Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the scummiest Floridian in history...

  • Why would any middle class American vote for either of these shitheads???????

  • Debbie dumbass Schultz, the wholey owned politcal whore of George Soros and Dumbass Obummer the Presidunce in grief. Down with democrats and socialism, down with dumb cunts in politics, and down with the idiot obama.

  • paul ryan attempts to have an adult conversation and is not having one because he says so? lmao! youtube has some interesting characters! ignorant, misleading, and gullible, but interesting.

  • RYAN TAKES HIS ODERS FROM THE KOCH BROTHERS!

  • Lol paul ryan is in the top 5 largest lobbyists in washington. he is EXACTLY the kind of corruption that should be kicked out. oh you kids, so funny.

  • The top 10% now has 90% of the FINANCIAL WEALTH of our country.

    The GOP & Dem Conventions MUST ADDRESS THIS WORSENING PROBLEM!

  • We must return to the progressive income tax rates of the Reagan Era!

  • "Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is

    to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the

    higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they

    rise." --Thomas Jefferson

  • A progressive tax on a large fortune is in no way a tax on thrift or industry as a like would be on a small fortune. No advantage comes to the country or to the individuals inheriting the money by permitting the transmission in their entirety of the enormous fortunes which would be affected by such a tax & as an incident to its function of revenue raising such a tax would help to preserve a measurable equality of opportunity for the ppl of the generations growing to manhood -- TEDDY ROOSEVELT

  • Schultz is one of the most ignorant people I have ever seen in my entire life. Every time I see her speak she's tripping over herself, repeating the same things, and failing CONSTANTLY. How is it this woman get's elected? I would assume a chimpanzee could do a better job on a mental level..

  • The key word in the title is "attempts". The word missing is "fails".

  • PROGRESSIVE TAXES - the rich pay a higher % of ncome in taxes than the middle class 1) Income tax REGRESSIVE TAXES - the middle class pays a higher % of ncome in taxes than the rich 1) Federal Social Security tax 2) Federal Gasoline Tax 3) Federal Beer & Wine Tax 4) Federal Tire Tax 5) Federal Cigarette Tax 6) Federal Telephone Tax 7) State Gasoline Tax 8) State Sales Tax 9) County Sales Tax 10) City Sales Tax + more than 200 more Ryan's plan will make the inc tax regressive too
  • @DillonDee1 You seem to be indoctrinated... Let me ask you, how is it so many people are completely fooled into arguing about who should have more money stolen from them and who should have less money stolen from them. What is it that makes people deteriorate into such an immoral ooze-like structure with no sense of value or understanding of what is good? How are people blinded to the fact that if you constantly steal more from the rich, all you get is a lot more poor?

  • Paul Ryan is just another corporate whore who wants Americas working families to get poorer while the rich elite who own him get richer. Paul Ryan has voted for massive deficit spending during his time in congress including the war in Iraq that's cost the American taxpayer over 1 Trillion bucks. So don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining Mr Ryan.

  • so he says he wants an adult conversation... then he laughs at her and can't let her even finish a sentence. really mature, mr. ryan

  • Privatizing social security is the only way to save it. Chile's version is a great example. The classic defined benefit model is good in theory but has failed time after time in the real world. Look at how underfunded state pensions are as well as social security.

  • Eddie Munster look a like. He is a fucking idiot and will not be reelected.

  • Ryan is a liar. Disgusting.

  • @marquesbooth No, Ryan is not a liar. Debby Blabbermouth Shultz on the other hand will say anything to get a sound byte true or untrue.

  • @BorislavX Why is it that republicans think that playground name calling is so clever? "Debby Blabbermouth Shultz", "dumbacrats". Do you guys think this accomplishes anything but making you look stupid and childish? It doesn't speak well to your creativity, intellect, or maturity. I basically confirms all of the worst things liberals think about you. Grow up and try learning enough about this stuff to have a real opinion. In your own vernacular: you're fucking clown shoes.

  • @monokhem Democrats do not resort to childish tactics. Rather they smear their political opponents as: racist, homophobic, xenophobic, bigoted, owned by corporations, sexist or any other number of things which grant you moral superiority and make it unnecessary for you folks to actually argue valid points.

  • @BorislavX The Arizona papers law is racist and xenophobic, don't ask don't tell is homophobic, republicans do directly enact policy written by corporations that pay their bills, and the defense of marriage act is bigoted. That isn't childish, it's reality.

    You aren't making any valid points. You are only saying stupid things like "Debby Blabbermouth Shultz" is a liar which isn't even true. That is why you are not worthy of respect.

  • @monokhem 1. Arizona law is an exact carbon copy of a federal that has been on the books for years, but since federal ice has not enforced it Arizona would like the right to do so. So no its not racist or xenophobic. Don't ask don't tell was enacted by William Jefferson Clinton - democrat. Defense of marriage is supported across the party lines including the president of the USA - democrat last time I checked. Everything you just said is 100% completely false and only goes to prove my point.

  • @BorislavX No it isn't. There is no federal law that tells cops to ask for people's papers on the street. Even if there was that wouldn't make that law not xenophobic and racist.

    DADT was still homophobic then, but it was a compromise between what the liberals wanted and what the homophobic conservatives wanted, and substantially less homophobic than the previous policy.

    See how everything I said was actually right? That is what happens when you try to "argue valid points". You got nothing.

  • @monokhem Sorry, yes it is, only it is a bit more harsh. "Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate of alien registration or any alien registration receipt card issued to him."

    As of don't ask don't tell, I would oppose any open sex in the army, homo or hetero... Army is not playboy magazine... The law has Clinton's name on it, so you're 100% wrong.

  • @BorislavX You keep saying 100% wrong. It isn't a magic incantation that makes you win an argument that you have provided no evidence for. Clinton having signed DADT in no way mitigates that republican support of it is homophobic. The notion that everyone in the military is ever going to keep their sex lives a total secret from everyone they work with is a ludicrous fantasy.

    Requiring brown people to carry proof that they are Americans is way more harsh, like Soviet Russia harsh.

  • @monokhem Sorry, the law has nothing, absolutely nothing about any race. I would support a law banning all displays of sexuality in the army. Homo and hetero... Don't ask don't tell is a bad idea so both dems and repubs who signed it into law were wrong imo.

  • @BorislavX Yes it does. Just because something isn't overtly written doesn't mean it isn't there. What part of checking the papers of suspected aliens doesn't add up to racist to you? It doesn't take a great mind to see how this works.

    Again, banning "displays of sexuality in the army" is impossible, impractical, totally subjective, and a bigger nest of stupid problems than DADT. We could just assume people in the military aren't crybaby wussies and move on.

  • You are wrong. The cops in Arizona only have a right to check the immigration status of a person who has already been arrested, detained, or stopped for ANOTHER altercation, but even if that wasn't the case and you were right, I do think we need to deport all illegals weather you are from Ireland, Russia or Mexico. Race has nothing to do with it.

  • @BorislavX Not according to the cops in AZ, and I consider them much more reliable source than you.

    Just a second to shudder over the word "stopped". Seriously are you from the generation that didn't hold the USSR up as the example of how not to run a government?

    I believe in the deportation of most illeagle aliens, although I think you are pretty scummy if you are against the dream act.

    Deportation is impractical though. $100,000 fine for each illegal hired should do it.

  • @monokhem Again with the scummy insults... Why can't somebody who disagrees with you just be of a different school of thought. From the conversation we have had so far I don't think you are scummy. I just think you are wrong. Please look up the warding on the Arizona Bill and you will see that I am in fact paraphrasing it correctly. I would agree with finding companies who hire illegals in addition to deportation and closing the border.

  • @monokhem As for the dream act... As a LEGAL immigrant and naturalized US citizen I do not think it to be fair that people and children of people who's first act in America was violation of her borders and immigration law should give them college aid or any other benefits that naturalized and native American citizens do not receive...

  • @monokhem Why is banning displays of sexuality impossible? I don't understand why this would be such a big problem. Either way wouldn't you think it is a bit wrong for a man and woman in the army to be taking showers together? If you agree why would you think it would be ok for hetero and homosexual men to be showering together. Don't you think that this will create sexual tension which is something that troops on the line of fire do not need?

  • @BorislavX A "display of sexuality" is a totally subjective and amorphous term. People have covered piano legs before because they were considered a "display of sexuality." The same goes for every part of the female anatomy, hugging, walking confidently, walking confidently while nude, having a particularly large part of you anatomy and wearing certain clothes, recommending the movie Wild Things, and talking about how you miss your wife.

    I think male a female soldiers should shower together.

  • @monokhem You make a pretty good point. There would have to be exact wording and qualification of what this display would mean. But again, I do not want to be showing and sharing a locker room with women or homosexual men. That does not mean I hate them, but you do understand why I say that I do not want to be in this situation, correct?