If I had the money, the E63 would definately be on my top ten list for a car to buy. It's got space, it's fast, and it's not a truck. Plus, you'd have so many people saying, WTF? how is a wagon that fast? lol
because they are extremely good fun especially on German Autobahns, and you get to transport more stuff in them being station wagons.. Plus, they sell.
OMG that is one hideous merc the estate, it looks like the car takes you on your last road, to the cemetery. Who would buy an E63 that looks like that and pay a fortune for it also??!! :O:O
hehe the e39 m5 goes head to head with the clk 55 amg so is gona be the same story .and were on earth are you gona do 155 mph so midd range amg could keep up with the e92 m3 simple.
not the supercharged one im a bmw fan ///m power for life but amg will own in a str8 line any 55 kompresser would beat the e92 m3 in a str8 line it will be close but amg will pull it off untill the corners
It's true. My friend owns both an S63 and a CLK63. He planned on chipping both, so he wanted to put them on a dyno first. After both of them (still stock) ran on the dyno the results were as expected. The S63 put 452 rwhp down (519 hp at the crank), while the CLK63 put down 449 rwhp (516 hp at the crank). Marketing is the only reason Benz claims power differences in the 63 models.
i think that the clk's are under rated cars . you can see it clear from the vid the its leaves the e 63 which is more or less as quick as the m5 forget the m3
i think the reason why u see so much imparity between amg cars is the fact that the engines are hand made... so the performance varies throught and u have to consider human error as well:)
Can you not follow a train of thought? He was talking about engines and that they are hand-built and thus there is a chance to human error during the build (i.e. not all engines necessarily put out the same numbers).
Wow. I really didn't expect that. I know the CLK63 has a less powerful version of the V8 that's in the E63, so I guess the CLK63's weight advantage won it. That's understandable, but I never thought the CLK63 would pull ahead that much. That was a massive win. The CLK wasn't a Black Series right?
The E63 Estate is one sexy car, especially in the Barolo red. I've only seen one E55 Estate in person and one E63 in person as they are special order cars in the US. I'd really wish they imported the M5 estate & Audi RS6 estate to the US as I'd really love to have one of them.
Do you think they would have enough buyers? So many americans say that estates is for soccermoms and so on. I like that you like them but if they would import them would they have enough buyers?
I think that if Audi & BMW at the least followed Mercedes Benz and offered them as special order, they'd do fine. I know the RS6's would go, especially here in the North East area of the US where I live. We've got so many damn Cayenne Turbos...I'd trade ours in for the Audi if we didn't need a tow vehicle!
Yeah, we don't get them at all over here. Not even an RS4 Estate or, believe this, a CLK63 Coupe. We do get the Convertible & did get the black series but not the coupe. I guess it was too close to the SL63, CL63, E63 & CLS63. Now that fuel prices have been rising, I think enthusiasts would start buying more wagons, even if the fuel mileage is marginally better than an ML63 or Cayenne Turbo.
Om e63:an hade varit en sedan och inte kombi, vilken hade vunnit då :P?
MrEliasN 11 months ago
this e63 wagon is faster than audi R8 !!!
guitarmafia20 1 year ago 7
Is this real ??
Than the clk 63 will eat any supercar ??
Pioneer53 2 years ago
E63 estate? Come on seriously?
Nickpatient 2 years ago
estate?
i call it the super sleeper or the super soccer mom
tjwakaa 1 year ago 2
Nice
Whats the song?
ZCP1364 2 years ago
the song is called "amazing" by "Seal"
spezib8 2 years ago
thanks
ZCP1364 2 years ago
Nothing is more tank than a high-performance German station wagon
4MATICbenz 2 years ago 6
i like the e63 estate but in black please
Mcmerc01 2 years ago 3
cock off in cock mobiles listen to the jammin cock music.
coreysm1th 3 years ago
nothing to top off a cock video with a cock comment huh
kushnugz 2 years ago
If I had the money, the E63 would definately be on my top ten list for a car to buy. It's got space, it's fast, and it's not a truck. Plus, you'd have so many people saying, WTF? how is a wagon that fast? lol
cookiehead2 3 years ago
nope audi rs6 580 bhp
Paki0416 3 years ago
why the fuck are mercedes and bmw making fast station wagons?
M3PanoS 3 years ago
because they are extremely good fun especially on German Autobahns, and you get to transport more stuff in them being station wagons.. Plus, they sell.
trident3b 3 years ago 5
yea i know theyre practical and all, i just hate how they look.
M3PanoS 3 years ago
The E63 drives like a limousine and has all the mod cons that you'd expect from a high end saloon (Sat-Nav, DVD, AC etc).
It has the practical boot space just short of an SUV, so it is great for carrying people as well as luggage.
Unlike an SUV, it handles like a car when on the road.
You can keep a low profile since nobody suspects anything from a station wagon.
Oh yeah, and it drives like a Super Car. 0-60 in less than 4.5 seconds.
It is the greatest all-round car you can get, but I am biased.
MusashiSamurai 2 years ago
they can do whatever they want
mswaheds 2 years ago
Gustav, any plans for an e55/clk63 race?
the clk seems like it would be a little closer to the m5 than the e55.
03basesedan 3 years ago
That E63 AMG wagon looks superb in Barolo Red with a Black interior. The ultimate stealth car.
JET997u 3 years ago
Vad heter låten som spelas i början inifrån bilen?
-------------------
What's the name of the song playing from inside the car in the beginning of the video?
Stranger100 3 years ago
seal - your amazing somthing like that but it is from seal
manick91 3 years ago
Okey, thanks! You are not sure witch Seal song it is? ;)
Stranger100 3 years ago
amazing
ZCP1364 2 years ago
yea those new clk's are beasts...
bulletproofuno 3 years ago
OMG that is one hideous merc the estate, it looks like the car takes you on your last road, to the cemetery. Who would buy an E63 that looks like that and pay a fortune for it also??!! :O:O
dreamon272 3 years ago
Wonder what the weight diff is..
novan3 3 years ago
That wagon is vicious
Domman56 3 years ago 2
clk is much lighter, stupid test.
csia1084 3 years ago
haha where would ms benz be without kompressor...
m3mys3lfandu 3 years ago
they don't use them in the 63
chris26900 3 years ago
CLK63 and E63 Does not have a kompressor learn more
AnaMalit 3 years ago
Synes dette er jævlig rart, Clk må være black series
Henkehasbeenhere 3 years ago
yeah but a raced a e 46 m3 and gaped him about 4 cars and i dont think that an e92 m3 is gona gap a e46 m3 7 cars can it
huzoclk55amg 3 years ago
yea right maybe 3 car lenghts the e39 m5 beat the e92 by a half car
lekocaj23 3 years ago
hehe the e39 m5 goes head to head with the clk 55 amg so is gona be the same story .and were on earth are you gona do 155 mph so midd range amg could keep up with the e92 m3 simple.
huzoclk55amg 3 years ago
not the supercharged one im a bmw fan ///m power for life but amg will own in a str8 line any 55 kompresser would beat the e92 m3 in a str8 line it will be close but amg will pull it off untill the corners
lekocaj23 3 years ago
my old c32 amg keep up with an e92 m3!!
audinoob 3 years ago
Benz win... for once.
frvrfrf54 3 years ago
do you lot think that a clk 55 amg 367 php with 510 nm of torque could hang on to a e 92 m3
huzoclk55amg 3 years ago
Definetly no. It lacks a Kompressor.
m5boarddotcom 3 years ago
without wanting to take it away from the clk63, the e63 just doesn't seem to perform at the level it should here! How old is it Gustav?
In the video with the ruf, the difference was not as big as I thought it would be...I guess the clk is just plain fast.
E92MPower 3 years ago
E63 Estate is a heavy car. CLK63 AMG is less heavy.
m5boarddotcom 3 years ago
Yes Gustav, less heavy, but the E63 is more powerful ! 514 Hp (481 for the CLK).
;)
JackNapier19 3 years ago
But I'm quite sceptical to AMG claims of different power ratings on the 63 models.
m5boarddotcom 3 years ago
You're problably right, marketing...
JackNapier19 3 years ago
It's true. My friend owns both an S63 and a CLK63. He planned on chipping both, so he wanted to put them on a dyno first. After both of them (still stock) ran on the dyno the results were as expected. The S63 put 452 rwhp down (519 hp at the crank), while the CLK63 put down 449 rwhp (516 hp at the crank). Marketing is the only reason Benz claims power differences in the 63 models.
1973MaseratiBora 3 years ago
Thanks man ;)
JackNapier19 3 years ago
HUGE Difference
BayPurp 3 years ago
i think that the clk's are under rated cars . you can see it clear from the vid the its leaves the e 63 which is more or less as quick as the m5 forget the m3
huzoclk55amg 3 years ago
i think the reason why u see so much imparity between amg cars is the fact that the engines are hand made... so the performance varies throught and u have to consider human error as well:)
mehrozeshah 3 years ago
lol how can someone screw up driving an automatic?
rickleg 3 years ago
Can you not follow a train of thought? He was talking about engines and that they are hand-built and thus there is a chance to human error during the build (i.e. not all engines necessarily put out the same numbers).
edthetallguy 3 years ago
It is possible the driver forgot to put it into "sport" (Changes gears in higher rev range).
Or he may have put it into paddle shift mode, in which case he may have hit the rev limiter before changing up gears.
In my own E63 wagon I've comfortable kept up with with an Ferrari 430, so this test has surprised me.
MusashiSamurai 2 years ago
yaeh sure a mercedis e class can keep up with a ferrari:P was it the toy ferrari of you son???
13herman 2 years ago
The E63 can get from 0-100kph in 4.3 seconds - so yes, it can keep up with some very fast cars including ferraris, porsches etc.
Check your facts.
MusashiSamurai 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
mcarthurwallace 2 years ago
Wow. I really didn't expect that. I know the CLK63 has a less powerful version of the V8 that's in the E63, so I guess the CLK63's weight advantage won it. That's understandable, but I never thought the CLK63 would pull ahead that much. That was a massive win. The CLK wasn't a Black Series right?
1973MaseratiBora 3 years ago
It was not a Black Series.
m5boarddotcom 3 years ago
The E63 Estate is one sexy car, especially in the Barolo red. I've only seen one E55 Estate in person and one E63 in person as they are special order cars in the US. I'd really wish they imported the M5 estate & Audi RS6 estate to the US as I'd really love to have one of them.
ferrarichy 3 years ago 2
Do you think they would have enough buyers? So many americans say that estates is for soccermoms and so on. I like that you like them but if they would import them would they have enough buyers?
MarinerMercury 3 years ago
I think that if Audi & BMW at the least followed Mercedes Benz and offered them as special order, they'd do fine. I know the RS6's would go, especially here in the North East area of the US where I live. We've got so many damn Cayenne Turbos...I'd trade ours in for the Audi if we didn't need a tow vehicle!
ferrarichy 3 years ago
don they?? Here i live all three come as estates, without special order. But if Audi and Bmw dont even offer them as estates thats wrong.
MarinerMercury 3 years ago
Yeah, we don't get them at all over here. Not even an RS4 Estate or, believe this, a CLK63 Coupe. We do get the Convertible & did get the black series but not the coupe. I guess it was too close to the SL63, CL63, E63 & CLS63. Now that fuel prices have been rising, I think enthusiasts would start buying more wagons, even if the fuel mileage is marginally better than an ML63 or Cayenne Turbo.
ferrarichy 3 years ago
how would the clk63 compare to the m5???
Frewarz 3 years ago
i guess it clk 63 can be compared to m3 not m5, i guess m5 is faster, even m3, who knows, M POWER always surprises us
vitocorleone57 3 years ago
clk is da best!
m3mys3lfandu 3 years ago