An Excellent moment with no fear! My Question today for sure!..777 would "haveta" be a win but that's not where it ever should end!....(7nine7 sounds even Greater!)
@cheetahhook would u perfer to to fly a new amazing high tech plane or a old crap plane from the 60s that has flown over 200 000 hours(btw i love planes from 60s)
@chiccoka see the thing is i dunno if airbus is lying but there stating that the a380 is very very energy effiecient so i think were also stepping in a newer economic friendly phase in aircrafts
Itwas the time to step fwd for Boeing also.I think they did good job and very nice result.Unfortunately the time is not in our side.recession everywhere i really hope the special level who manipulating the whole world will be get back to normal river and let people spend they onw money.The big recession will show us Airbus or boeing will be the most popular.but deffenetly not Sukhoi super jet 100.anyway the brasilian guys also in market so dont forget Embraer.
yea the landing gear is always kept down on the first flight because.. its the first flight up to now everything things has been on paper and computer no one knows for sure what the plane will do... so its kept down incase it has to make an emergency landing or if the system fails the gear will be already in the down position...
landing gears are always down on testing my friend. emergency landings are always on the back of the head when these tests are done on unproven aircrafts.
Yes .Carbon fiber reinforcement .But still big question what will happen if a towing car or car or baggage car will make any dents.Water in during icing extend and bummm
In the event of damage a repair is engineered, scarfed out and a repair layup is made. In most cases 100%plus of the load path can be restored. The repairs will be watertight. Carbon doesn't retain water the way Kevlar does so delamination isn't as much of a problem due to water. I would much rather do a composite repair rather than sheet metal.
@rsanchez1416 hes just pointing it out... it is an Associated Press posting so i was wondering the same. Associated press isnt very internationally friendly...
hes not being racist.
if you saw some of the people i deal with at work... those are racists.
Having flown on both Airbuses and Boeings, I can conclude that Air New Zealand has shitty economy class seating and rubbish meals. I can't personally comment on the performance of either, but I can say that ATRs are rubbish to ride in.
I've flown both Airbus and Boeing planes for Virgin Atlantic for nearly 7 years folks. There is simply no comparison. The 747, 777 simply outperform the Airbus A380 and A300. Boeing has been doing it longer and better for decades now and it will take decades more (if ever) for Airbus to achieve anything close to what Boeing engineers have done. The 787 set the bar a tad higher today and in fine fashion i might add!
747 is nice... but the A380 outclasses it it all dimensions - and I say that as a Boeing fan.
The A380 surpassed what Boeing engineers were coming up with: ever more variants on the same old 747 airframe - instead of coming up with a new large format commercial liner.
In the jumbo market, Boeing is at a huge (A380-sized) disadvantage.
You might have flown in them but from a passengers perspective Airbus is what it is all about! You might be ok up there in the cockpit, to the rear of the boeing its cramped and unpleasant and after all the passengers are the customers :-)
Gentlemen: Calling the Boeing product "cramped and crowded" and the Airbus spacious is kinda silly, flown in examples of both and the last Airbus (A320) was a sardine can. Try to remember that it's the CARRIER who outlines specs on seating arrangements and not the builder. You want spacious, spring for a 1st class seat.
One more comment: You've seen the promo photos of the 787 cabin. You really think that the carriers are gonna feature that sort of seating in anything except 1st class? The cabin is gonna be SRO after the airlines get done with their options so they can pay the airplane off as quickly as they can, not a bad idea in today's economy. Stop bickering about who's "better". Airbus and Boeing and yes Tupolev all make a decent product. They have to or they wouldn't sell any of them.
@angloengland Actually this is decided by airline companies who buy the planes you fly in. The company could offer more room if they wish. As you might notice, certain airlines have more room in their seats even though you might be flying in that same aircraft you have flown in before. This is due to the airline companies requirement, NOT Boeing or Airbus.
I don't want to upset you Kevinesse... but Airbus was the first to use composite materials, already back during the 80s mainly on the A300, one of its first produced aeroplane!
@ Ronestar ! Why so offended? Of course Japanese! Ever heard of "Mitsubishi Heavy Industries aerospace" They helped developing the 787... what's wrong with that? Many engineers from various nationalities work for Boeing as well as at Airbus! I wonder who's the racist here?
They fabricate... but don't sell a major aircraft brand of their own. U.S. has Boeing. Europe has Airbus. Russia has Tupolev. Japan has no commercial airliner company.
@Ronestar ! I definitely agree with you on that point. But you can't deny that Japan developed and designed different parts for the 787 on their own... well understood on behalf of Boeing! I think it's a great thing that 2 great nations with very different cultures manage to work together and achieve such ambitious project like the 787...
Ronestar- Japs are crafty thieves in technology (U.S. Car industry) Space and anything they don't have the brains to invent themselves.They have decimated the whale population. And killer dogs and rapists of Koreans in WW2. F.U.
Who os the farking lunatic with the hysterical laugh in the background noise?? Shoulda bin SHOT!!
arjoj10 3 months ago
Cool, a plastic airplane? What next? A rubber pilot?
Kg277 6 months ago
Boing Boing on da'Boeing..
Kg277 6 months ago
I want a few minutes of flight-control chatter before take-off.
WaterBear31 6 months ago
Can it run on a single engine? that has always been the safety net of smaller planes.
GarysBeerReview 6 months ago
@GarysBeerReview Yes it can. It would not pass numerous certifications otherwise. Begin by researching ETOPS..
Kg277 6 months ago
How is this a raw video?
ninjadude92584 9 months ago
An Excellent moment with no fear! My Question today for sure!..777 would "haveta" be a win but that's not where it ever should end!....(7nine7 sounds even Greater!)
foxyroxstar 11 months ago
Not a raw video at all...
WarriorsOfRy 1 year ago
WTF did anyone see the near crash at 10-14 seconds!!! O.O
561inurface 1 year ago
Just a bigger crash is all it's going to be.
crispycream 1 year ago
@crispycream FYI No one care what you think.......and secondly people who build these planes beg to differ.
BHSof2000 1 year ago
@shess0501 To me it looks like a camera or a parachute, but I also call a vertical stabilizer a tail. :D
KBCC3 1 year ago
There seems to be a LOT of dihedral on this aircraft...
MrColorfulcat 1 year ago
i think its for testing how stable airplane actually is
dricaboy12 2 years ago
how the hell is that a raw video?
Skaterman30000 2 years ago
Nice wings
ImJustASpectator 2 years ago
Forever New Awesomeness
Archie23rulz 2 years ago 3
That's to measure something, aerodynamics i think...
tiadaid 2 years ago
早く日本に来ないかな
1MUGICHA1 2 years ago
i think i just had an orgasm.....lol wtf are these people tripping over
Rockyzach88 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what the fuck is the big whoop? its just a boeing, people are idiots.
damonsecloro 2 years ago
@damonsecloro
If you don't know, then I guess that would make you the idiot.
Xenite227 2 years ago 8
@Xenite227 what because its 2 years late? who cares
damonsecloro 2 years ago
amazingly quiet
bosstwinkie68 2 years ago
WOW!!!
CoastStarlight11 2 years ago
The sound of tha Obama Zombies drowned out the sound of the engines at takeoff
tonapah141 2 years ago 2
agreed
Rockyzach88 2 years ago
What's the big deal? Is it faster?
sniper6081 2 years ago
@sniper6081 It's marginally faster, but the main selling point is its supposed efficiency and its very long range, especially in the 787-9 series.
frescobaldi1987 2 years ago 2
What about the environmental damage?
JackBlair2 2 years ago
i won't take this plane, just afraid it will fall down....
cheetahhook 2 years ago
@cheetahhook would u perfer to to fly a new amazing high tech plane or a old crap plane from the 60s that has flown over 200 000 hours(btw i love planes from 60s)
drake123josh 2 years ago
Big question.But anyway show must go on.We killing the earth so better to step fwd.
As an aircraft mechanic i can not c a lot of changes from the middle of the fifties.what changed in flying is the IT,and some design.
chiccoka 2 years ago
@chiccoka see the thing is i dunno if airbus is lying but there stating that the a380 is very very energy effiecient so i think were also stepping in a newer economic friendly phase in aircrafts
drake123josh 2 years ago
Itwas the time to step fwd for Boeing also.I think they did good job and very nice result.Unfortunately the time is not in our side.recession everywhere i really hope the special level who manipulating the whole world will be get back to normal river and let people spend they onw money.The big recession will show us Airbus or boeing will be the most popular.but deffenetly not Sukhoi super jet 100.anyway the brasilian guys also in market so dont forget Embraer.
chiccoka 2 years ago
Blah blah blah...
alukuhito 2 years ago
Now that's a beautiful bird. Nice wing flex! Can't wait to see her land at my local (EGGD).
bywestonbay 2 years ago
THATS AMAZING!!!
tbonelife 2 years ago
Wow, the wings look very different!
dolcevalse9883 2 years ago
yea the landing gear is always kept down on the first flight because.. its the first flight up to now everything things has been on paper and computer no one knows for sure what the plane will do... so its kept down incase it has to make an emergency landing or if the system fails the gear will be already in the down position...
Nanderson2464 2 years ago 2
well i really want to chat i have pics too so ..
annnbabii 2 years ago
I'm just wondering, why is the landing gear kept down? Is there some reasons for that?
topgunwow 2 years ago
landing gears are always down on testing my friend. emergency landings are always on the back of the head when these tests are done on unproven aircrafts.
aceman42 2 years ago
Thanks.
topgunwow 2 years ago
It's called composite, not plastic. And it's stronger and lighter than aluminum.
Sn0wdawgz 2 years ago 10
@Sn0wdawgz
Yes .Carbon fiber reinforcement .But still big question what will happen if a towing car or car or baggage car will make any dents.Water in during icing extend and bummm
chiccoka 2 years ago
In the event of damage a repair is engineered, scarfed out and a repair layup is made. In most cases 100%plus of the load path can be restored. The repairs will be watertight. Carbon doesn't retain water the way Kevlar does so delamination isn't as much of a problem due to water. I would much rather do a composite repair rather than sheet metal.
TT350500600 2 years ago
My dad was the auditor of the 787 Everett Boeing, He said the plane is made by Plastic......
Stoneless014 2 years ago
such a beautiful thing
josb1976 2 years ago 2
stop using "@" ... this isn't Twitter.
rhs2000vtec 2 years ago
@rhs2000vtec When you reply to someone now it automatically puts that there..
PolkTheSwimmer 2 years ago
Hmmm. I don't see the "@" for others but no worries, thanks for clearing that up. :-)
rhs2000vtec 2 years ago
Am I the only one to notice that at 0:22 there's a small plane apparently landing on top of the 787??? :)
hicsuntleones 2 years ago
T-33 chase plane.
KKolchak 2 years ago
??????
michiferrucci 2 years ago
@hicsuntleones yeah and its gone a second later i noticed that a load of times.
smackheadmetal 2 years ago
why the fuck is every comment well most of em in spanish????
snyway i wanted to say that the dreamliner rocks!
i found out they cost about 23million$
ukpilot92 2 years ago
@ukpilot92 -because you don't own the internet you fucking racist dick!
rsanchez1416 2 years ago
@rsanchez1416 hes just pointing it out... it is an Associated Press posting so i was wondering the same. Associated press isnt very internationally friendly...
hes not being racist.
if you saw some of the people i deal with at work... those are racists.
smackheadmetal 2 years ago
porque los aplausos que paso innaguracion o que??
noeliajacqueline 2 years ago
Primer despegue de este modelo
sirgerry 2 years ago
has that plane anything special? I see just another plane with two wings, a fuselage, two engines,some windows and gateway, carriage and a tail...
yepheth 2 years ago
yeah it's the most fuel efficient aircraft for airlines
RoidinRichie 2 years ago
cavolo ha più fan di edward cullen, a sentire le urla delle sfegatate teenagers!
COCHIAIRWAYS 2 years ago
ma è l'aeroporto di grottaglie in provincia di taranto?
godret 2 years ago
@godret : eh si, probabile! Da sempre i voli inaugurali dei Boeing li fanno a Grottaglie...
cris2811 2 years ago
arriveremo al boeing 999????:)
jurkengik 2 years ago
c'è il 998R???
GiAnTTrInCh 2 years ago
Sul 666 io non ci salirei :D
hicsuntleones 2 years ago
Grande, vedremo se sarà meglio di Airbus 380!!!
myabmw 2 years ago
Peccato che sono due velivoli totalmente diversi quindi non possono essere messi in comparazione !
virtualgear81 2 years ago
really nice plane : ]--is like the 737 or cange wat?
MrLOCUST7 2 years ago
brawiii
poetaturca 2 years ago
Having flown on both Airbuses and Boeings, I can conclude that Air New Zealand has shitty economy class seating and rubbish meals. I can't personally comment on the performance of either, but I can say that ATRs are rubbish to ride in.
sockless67 2 years ago
Iran Airlines is probably the safest airlines in the world simply because it carries passengers+anti-missile warheads.
gundumauna 2 years ago
hahaha good one =) XD
PosEidoNhNs 2 years ago
Plus it isn't a target of Islamic Extremists
angloengland 2 years ago
@gundumauna LOL
FckM3ImFam0us 2 years ago
I saw this live on TV today! =D
viksra 2 years ago
Actually, I saw the landing today. Not the take off.
viksra 2 years ago
I've flown both Airbus and Boeing planes for Virgin Atlantic for nearly 7 years folks. There is simply no comparison. The 747, 777 simply outperform the Airbus A380 and A300. Boeing has been doing it longer and better for decades now and it will take decades more (if ever) for Airbus to achieve anything close to what Boeing engineers have done. The 787 set the bar a tad higher today and in fine fashion i might add!
Ree109 2 years ago 3
747 is nice... but the A380 outclasses it it all dimensions - and I say that as a Boeing fan.
The A380 surpassed what Boeing engineers were coming up with: ever more variants on the same old 747 airframe - instead of coming up with a new large format commercial liner.
In the jumbo market, Boeing is at a huge (A380-sized) disadvantage.
Ronestar 2 years ago
@Ronestar Quality over quantity my friend. Remember THAT :)
BHSof2000 1 year ago
You might have flown in them but from a passengers perspective Airbus is what it is all about! You might be ok up there in the cockpit, to the rear of the boeing its cramped and unpleasant and after all the passengers are the customers :-)
angloengland 2 years ago
Gentlemen: Calling the Boeing product "cramped and crowded" and the Airbus spacious is kinda silly, flown in examples of both and the last Airbus (A320) was a sardine can. Try to remember that it's the CARRIER who outlines specs on seating arrangements and not the builder. You want spacious, spring for a 1st class seat.
palevictory 2 years ago 3
One more comment: You've seen the promo photos of the 787 cabin. You really think that the carriers are gonna feature that sort of seating in anything except 1st class? The cabin is gonna be SRO after the airlines get done with their options so they can pay the airplane off as quickly as they can, not a bad idea in today's economy. Stop bickering about who's "better". Airbus and Boeing and yes Tupolev all make a decent product. They have to or they wouldn't sell any of them.
palevictory 2 years ago 2
Cabin width/ height not seating as thats obviously airlines constraits.
angloengland 2 years ago
@angloengland Actually this is decided by airline companies who buy the planes you fly in. The company could offer more room if they wish. As you might notice, certain airlines have more room in their seats even though you might be flying in that same aircraft you have flown in before. This is due to the airline companies requirement, NOT Boeing or Airbus.
BHSof2000 1 year ago
good god, shut that bitch up
bigmaxy07 2 years ago
Damn that woman was yelling like she saw god.
Tunerboy8732 2 years ago
How does Boeing feel about Carbon caps, and offsets?
It seems the Copenhagen summit is aimed directly at the aircraft industry.
Kerrville911Truth 2 years ago
Composite materials - one more design idea for Airbus to copy, but they'll never beat the original.
Kevinessequamvideri 2 years ago 2
I don't want to upset you Kevinesse... but Airbus was the first to use composite materials, already back during the 80s mainly on the A300, one of its first produced aeroplane!
PaLx78 2 years ago
Looks like a scene from a James Bond movie (minus the action).
nobleheight 2 years ago
You mean when the small jet tailgates behind it?
pilotlim 2 years ago
No. The unveiling of a new plane. However, the James Bond movie had terror action. This unveiling had no terrorist action.
nobleheight 2 years ago
mad B**ch yelping all through the video pees her pants at 58secs
paddioche 2 years ago
A lot of people worked really hard on this.
Too bad they are outsourcing it to a bunch of it to other countries.
flanksteak1 2 years ago
looks nice,... just a bigger buss
paddioche 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How soon will the JAPS steal and copy the technology?
Leonnidik 2 years ago
The Japanese? WTF are you smoking? Boeing gets parts for the Dreamliner FROM Japan. Giver your head a shake, you racist doilyfucker.
And furthermore, the Japanese don't have a major aircraft manufacturer - so you're completely wanking in the woods.
Ronestar 2 years ago 7
Doilyfucker... in the woods... lmao!
R32inAZ 2 years ago
@ Ronestar ! Why so offended? Of course Japanese! Ever heard of "Mitsubishi Heavy Industries aerospace" They helped developing the 787... what's wrong with that? Many engineers from various nationalities work for Boeing as well as at Airbus! I wonder who's the racist here?
PaLx78 2 years ago
They fabricate... but don't sell a major aircraft brand of their own. U.S. has Boeing. Europe has Airbus. Russia has Tupolev. Japan has no commercial airliner company.
Ronestar 2 years ago
@Ronestar ! I definitely agree with you on that point. But you can't deny that Japan developed and designed different parts for the 787 on their own... well understood on behalf of Boeing! I think it's a great thing that 2 great nations with very different cultures manage to work together and achieve such ambitious project like the 787...
PaLx78 2 years ago
Ronestar- Japs are crafty thieves in technology (U.S. Car industry) Space and anything they don't have the brains to invent themselves.They have decimated the whale population. And killer dogs and rapists of Koreans in WW2. F.U.
Leonnidik 2 years ago
Comment removed
PaLx78 2 years ago
PALx78--Fuck You you asswipe. Go eat anothr endangered whale with all your JAP friends you scumbag. I speak the truth.
Leonnidik 2 years ago
wow
the2009productions 2 years ago
American aviation technology still beats the world.
tjmcgreevy 2 years ago 7
Comment removed
fegde 2 years ago