@anilsadaram LMAO! So according to your "expert" opinion it only took 2 weeks to place explosives in WTC 7? Kind of a short time period, even for a 911 twoofer. 911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
To end this conspiracy I have an idea. I think a responsible US citizen can file a case in court to pvt investigate 2 weeks traffic recordings from all entries and exits of WTC before the demolition happened, and the video recordings of all exits and entries of building 7 between the time period of WTC and building 7 collapse.You will find the specific vans going in and out of those buildings for sure, and also find controlled demolition team from building 7. If you remove I will keep posting.
the UNEDITED version of the building 7 collapse can be found at ItWasTyped. com
see for yourself how it did NOT free fall, it collapsed progressively. Look under the 'conspiracy theory' section and find the Building 7 post. Definitive proof that conspiracy theorists are WRONG. Haha!
Oh this is hilarious. You actually show the full video of the top of Building 7 progressively collapse from left to right AND it's somehow STILL a conspiracy.
Always they are talking about the twin towers never remembering building 7 because it very embarasing, think there was a 3rd plane which shood being crashed on the building 7 and it never reach the objectif
Building 7 was a controlled demolition job and so were the twin towers. I believe the architects and engineers and even demolition experts who say that it was a controlled demolition job. And I believe the firemen and other eyewitnesses who say they heard explosions going off in the buildings repeatedly.
@caferisque.."the 3 buildings were controlled demolition jobs".
---
Really?..that's odd because a diverse group of hundreds of experts in tall building design, steel structure behavior, fire protection engineering, blast effects, and structural investigations have studied the collapses.
These are some of the best engineers in the world & after yrs of intense study, they “ALL” have come up with a perfectly logical, scientific explanation for what happened.
Do a search for Skull and Bones people. Seriously, if you don't know what that is just by reading this comment...then you are WAY behind in life. Catch up.
Also: Look for this video: 4409 -- (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle!
I can simply rest my case.. this building is blown apart from the inside.. also, I have seen all the angels and I've seen no major damage from antelnnes or anything.. and plase.. why only the WTC buildings.. there are so many buildings there.
honestly all anyone has to do is type in on youtube "demolition compare" and watch videos of controlled demolitions compared to building 7....there is no way you can tell me that even tho one building came down from apparent fire damage,and one building came down from explosives,that they would both fall down at almost the exact same speed and the same style,a pancake collapse....
Whatever was in that building couldn't be extracted. So they decided to demo the whole thing. What if 9-11 was a cover for this to happen. They couldn't just pull it for no reason. They needed a diversion
Human beings have perpertrated atrocities since our beginning; holocaust, the crusades, genocides, pillages, wars etc. so what's the big deal? just embrace yourselves for the next ones to come. It's what we humans do best
@orangon How can you be right when you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist with no evidence? LMAO You can't state something is true without evidence. dumbass
@theBartone9119 zogbot trolls, patriotards and other assorted douchestains like yourself, all scared of a new investigation for their respective reasons. lol
@grasshopperjunction No one's afraid of another investigation, but conspiracy kooktards will be disappointed when the investigation doesn't support their fruitcakery. LMAO
@orangon "I guess everyone's entitled to their opinion, it kind of angers me because I was there...I was here and you weren't. I think they have no respect for all the friends of mine that I lost, and all the people that died that day.. it's like a slap in their face" - Lietenant Frank Papalia (FDNY, 1998 - 2006)
@orangon Deep inside I know you are a tool.Google: "Bridging The Gap: Building 7 - Club Conspiracy Forums". I wrote a piece on Building 7 that should educated your small warped mind. There is no official story either, I don't believe stories, I believe physics and science, and they all support what happened that day. Only fools believe this garbage that isn't backed up by shit. I am not a sheep, you are the sheep, I am the farmer, here to enter the stable and smack you around. Read my WTC7 piece
That's exactly why the US and Nato just put AlQueda into government in Lybia.. Who ya all think the so called rebels are? So who is the enemy now? Read the news. They say it. Just most people are too ignorant to catch it. Not to mention that the first responders (the real heros) are not allowed there this year.. Its because too many of them woke up and started to realize how corrupt our leaders have gotten.... And 70% of food in our stores is GMO.. No wonder cancer rates are going crazy.
"I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I am an engineer and i conclude Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition." - Over thousands and thousands of experts.
this is the only time in history in which a huge plane filled with jet fuel has hit a building that size, so how can anyone say, let alone people with no sort of qualifications to make these kinds of statements, that its impossible for the building to collapse? And thus the confirmation bias arrises, cause no matter how little evidence truthers have, they cant even concede the point that maybe, just maybe, buildings like these were not designed to withstand such circumstances
EVERYBODY KNOWS THE JEWS PLANNED, EXECUTED AND COVERED-UP 9/11!!!!
* The "five dancing Israelis" arrested with explosives and artwork of plane crashing in to buildings.
* Jew Chertoff oversaw the "enquiry" and didn't even mention Building 7.
* Israeli TV Jews admit "we were there to record the event"
* Jew Silverstein OWNED the WTC buildings and could let his Jew friends plant the Thermite based explosives, now PROVEN by Danish Scientists, was used.
Everyone I talk to never heard of building 7, what happened with the media not getting that information out that Building 7 was demolished! We hear about the twin towers and how it was first attacked in 1992 with the help of inside FBI informants, but building 7, nothing! Why did they blow up Building 7.Why, why, why. Was it too old, did it need a new pay job and why blow it up at the same time that two planes crashed the twin towers.Why set Building 7 to come down as Bin L crashed two planes.
@Jai666666666 Motive is Insurance & Bank fraud among many other frauds I have the inside story.Unfortunately the perps. R still at large because of BS (Barry Soetoro).SPGFunds Silverstein Properties Group is one of many joint venture private public partnerships brokered by the real mastermind of 911.He can be seen from the back on my featured vid. Larry gazing lovingly at their coup of 7 bil $ ins. $ accessed. The kicker is ins. for the CIA.&DHS$ MINE! UBS merging into USBancorpPiperJaffray. HRS
@HoneySiegalSurvivor You don't know what you're talking about. Larry Silverstein was vindicated in the USCORP bank fraud case in AZ. But you are intentionally presenting fraudulent information. You belong back in the Clay County, Illinois jail. They only released you because of a clerical error. Besides, deceased people like you can't think straight.
So, FEMA arrived on MONDAY, Sept 10th. SILVERSTEIN, the new owner took out MASSIVE amounts of insurance on the complex BEFORE 911 AND building #7 was PULLED (a term for a controlled demolition). AND Mr. Silversteins' (15) million dollar investment NETTED him 7 or 8 BILLION dollars? Hmmmmmmmm......
Building number 7 is the most obvious sign of controlled demolition for a few simple reasons:
1.The building wasn't hit by a plane so there is no reason for it to collapse in any way.
2. A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone and there is even no chance of fire breaching with a sprinkler-system. Building number 7 had a sprinkler system, it fights fire mechanically even when there's no electrical power.
@Bedmen1 "A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone"
Really? Which highrise structural engineer or fire protection engineers says that?
"Building number 7 had a sprinkler system"
Water was cut off to it as a result of the tower collapses cutting the water main. That's according to the firefighters. Now that you know that, I assume you'll adjust your opinion of the collapse accordingly. Just kidding! You guys never adjust your views to the facts.
@TheFlyposter Oh please.. .. a collapse of a roof like that! That's not a building like this at all!!! You can't compare that! Offcourse a roof like that falls down!
@Bedmen1 The Kader toy factory totally collapsed, you stated no other steel framed building has collapsed due to fire alone, therefore you are now shifting the goal posts.
"A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone"
@Bedmen1...". Building number 7 had a sprinkler system, it fights fire mechanically even when there's no electrical power."....
------
The collapse of the two towers caused many main waterlines to burst and there was was not any water going to WTC 7....There was not enough water for the firemen to fight the fire, thats why it burned all day.
@Bhomein However, it wasn't the debris that caused the failures specifically, it was the trusses around the columns that failed which caused the buckling of those 2 columns. You got the just of it though lol
@Bedmen1 1. "It (Building 7) wasn't hit by a plane, but it was hit by debris from the North Tower when it fell" - Dylan Avery (Creator of Loose Change)
2. WTC had a sprinkler system, but had many single-point vulnerabilities for failure. Building 7 had no concrete core and used a long span floor truss system. The fire proofing was only tested for 2 hours and the fire lasted 7.
Building 7 was obviously not a controlled demolition.
@Bedmen1 "A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone and there is even no chance of fire breaching with a sprinkler-system."
1. A building CAN collapse from fire alone, certainly.
2. Building 7's sprinkler system failed due to the water mains breaking when the twin towers collapsed.
There was no water to fight the fires and the entire building was abandoned and left to burn. It was expected to collapse by fire fighters and other first responders.
@Bedmen1 WTC 7 was hit by the anntena of the north tower when it fell, creating a huge gash down the fron tof the building, weakening its structure. when it got hit by the debris, and got torn open by the antena, it started fired inside the building. when the antena hit, it broke 90% of the sprinkler system in the building, and the 10% that was left, didnt do the job. the building also burn for around 7 hrs. a long time, the steel finaly got to a point, and i failed. WTC 7 fell at around 5.p.m
@tampabaybucs7 Look for the video: ae911truth (9-9-10) SidebySide Demolition Compare Proof WashDC Debate
There are your scientists.. think about it: why do all of these buildings fall straight down? A collapse would start out in a section of the building, not all at ones.
@Bedmen1 Oh, a steel building CAN collapse from fire alone. Hot steel already loses strength way before it starts to melt. Steel doesn't have to melt in order for a building to collapse, you idiots!
Conspiracy twats should learn real physics instead of using that piss-poor pseudoscience rubbish that they have learned in college dorms.They bring a bad light on science. It's embarrassing. Read a book, read a book, read a fucking physics book! ;)
@StandingRedPanda WOW YOUR AN IDIOT! YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT WITH NO BRAIN...DID YOU EVEN GO TO COLLEGE? GET A DEGREE FOR YOURSELF BEFORE YOU START CRITICIZING OTHERS...LARRY SILVERSTEIN ADMITTED TO IT YOU FUCKING LITTLE DICK PUSSY OF A MAN...YOU OBVIOUSLY DIDNT KNOW ANYONE IN THOSE TOWERS BECAUSE IF IT WERE YOUR BROTHER OR MOM YOU WOULD HAVE A DIFFERENT OUTLOOK ON ALL OF THIS OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE....GO JUMP OF SOMETHING HIGH U WASTE OF OXYGEN
3. If a plane would hit the building it still would not collapse. I can support this with facts:
“The Bijlmerramp” was an accident in the Netherlands where a jumbo jet in 1992 in fact DID hit an apartment building in Amsterdam and still it did not collapse except for the small part it did actually destroy by the crash itself.
So it is clear: a building that does NOT suffer a plane impact does NOT collapse
@Bedmen1 The plane was traveling at landing speed, not full speed, The building is of a completely different design, the plane has lost 3 of it's engines (the weightiest, and strongest part, that causes most damage), the pilot dumped his fuel for a crash landing, and yet the building still suffered significant partial collapse.
So what if it was controlled demo. Let the other shoe. You know the US is taking measures to insure our prosperity and that for generations to come...you know that the USA will be a big player in the NWO...and you like the NWO...that is why you haven't left this country.
You might whine to ease your conscious that can't handle the truth, but you will stay in this country.
This is crap 9/11 was controlled by the government.under bulding 7 was a nuclear safe zone for people if there was ever a nuclear war.they blew down this bulding also a couple weeks or a month before they double the insurance on those two buldings.it was controlled by our gov.
Many buildings are designed to implode or fall as straight down as possible to avoid damage to surrounding buildings in the event of severe structural damage or compromise. There are people known as Engineers who are far smarter and competent than the idiots who theorize conspiracy shit. Good Engineer = Planned ahead for crappy things, Conspiracy Theorists for the most part = fail... fail...fail.
anybody want to debate me on xbox live about 9/11??? im a conspiracy theorist.
ive been in debates with all sorts of people and never lost a single one to this day send me a party invite/add me incase im not on, i dont care who you are how many of your friends you want in the debate whatever works as long as its not a bunch of 9year olds screaming. by the way the debate will start with WTC7.
@marhoekful At 1:04 the WTC 7 began to collapse. 7 was on the ground at 1:16 so there's you're proof that it was not a controlled demo. On all controlled demolitions you have loud booms you can hear a mile away. There were no booms and the guy who put up the video conveniently didnt have sound when cameras were closer to building 7.
@marhoekful No. What does that have to do with anything? If you'd rather change the subject, which is what you're trying to do, then go ahead. People who do so usually do it because they can't explain why they're wrong. It doesn't change the fact that there were no booms or flashes on building 7. Oh not to mention that it didn't fall on it's footprint as Loose Change claims.
@godzilla1077 There is a whole society of Architects, engineers, physics professor, metallurgists, who have determined the only way these buildings came down the way they did, was with explosives, they even have phsyical evidence in the form of unexploded explosive residue in the dust. You are overwhelmed by the prospect of such a conspiracy......this creates denial as a coping mechanism.
@marhoekful Wrong on all counts. There have been ZERO structural engineers or experts for that matter that have said explosives were used. And if you're going to mention the joke that is AE911Truth, it's a sham, Richard Gage doesn't even do his own investigation at all.
ironically this was the Solomon Brothers building and supposedly Solomon was wise (until the women). And this is the reductio ad absurdum of the whole thing. This is what changed my mind. And there are lots like me.
I love how they say that bombs went off when you can very clearly hear no explosions in the clip
Furthermore why would the government blow up wtc 7. Did they really think that would be the final straw for the american people.
"Steve terrorists blew up the Twin towers and pentagon"
"Dont Care"
"AND BUILDING 7!!!""
"WHAT?!?!? TO WAR!!!!!"
And building seven and the towers collapsed in visually different ways. And yet they're evidently both done using the same materials and tactics. Uh no
Building#7 could have burned and burned until all of the material was gone and the steel structure that was fire proofed with coated asbestos would be remaining. One corner was damaged but that would not cause the entire structure to fall completely vertically. Or even collapse at all. The Main Footings are NOT at the corners people. Get real already.
You are stupid if you believe that building 7 was Not a controlled demolition! It was a perfectly executed demolition! lol it is so00O! obvious.
Reading more comments posted here i keep on seeing people ask. Where is the proof of the controlled demolition? Well i ask in return where is the proof that it wasn't? I know it takes a good amount of time to set up controlled demos and would be extemely hard to hide. Also people have asked how would they know to even plant bombs in 7? Guess what i don't have all the answers but i know that the only way that building fell was because of controlled demolition not by fire.
@darknessrising999 Its nothing to do with the time to set up a CD. The issue is it would take a team of say 20 men a couple of weeks to do this, in an EMPTY building. In the twin towers, they would have to bring all the explosives and machinery in, open up walls, fit the bombs, run the wires, hide them all, close up the walls, replaster, repaint them, tidy up, so there was no evidence, and without making any noise, so none of the hundreds of people who work there 24/7 would notice a thing...
@ytcf71 When you don't know what explosive was used or how it was installed it's difficult to know how difficult it was or how long it took. You're just guessing. But with WTC7 there's lots of good video, so there's lots of proof and no guessing required. It dropped at free fall which is characteristic of CD, not fire... Thanks.
@AlNouveau Its irrelevent. It would need to be installed covertly, and unless it was magicced there by elves, it will need x amount of people, with tools, and equipment, and noise - No guessing, common sense. You just can't answer my question and simple logic that is all.
@ytcf71 That's an amazing statement. You know absolutely nothing about the structure, or the security or who had access. Or what kind of explosives could have been used, how it could have been placed or detonated. You don't know how the fires started or where. You don't know why the structure failed or why there was no search of the debris for explosives. You know Jack about anything yet you claim that CD is impossible. Your name George Bush? You want to discuss you better bring more than that.
@AlNouveau.....once again another Conspiracy theorist running away from common sense. FACT - Public in the building - FACT, people would need to fit the explosives - FACT - Public in the building would see people fitting the explosives -
I dont care if the explosives are made out of invisible cheese and the security guards can fly - no one would take the risk of such a hairbrained scheme actually being pulled off without a hitch or anyone noticing.
@ytcf71 Where have I heard this BS before, "no one would take the risk of such a hairbrained scheme" you mean like hijacking commercial aircraft to crash into buildings armed with box cutters. You must be Conoleezza Rice.
@AlNouveau Hijacking a plane is crazy yes, but so is killing yourself doing it, so not really the same comparison to thinking the government trying to concoct the largest misdemeanour ever, which is bound to fail from so many variables, and could bring their downfall at any time in the future if any of the people involved speak out.
@AlNouveau Lets pretend you are in charge of this whole operation. How would you make sure every person involved (thousands, from planning to end result) never says a word? How would you make sure no evidence could ever be found? How would you make sure no one in the WTC ever noticed any explosives being fitted?
Imagine you order the workers to plant the explosives, and the team asks you 'what if somebody sees us'......What is your reply to them, or how are you going to prevent this?
@ytcf71 I'd do exactly what they did, shock and awe. By the time it (shock and awe) wore off all the evidence would be gone, carted away and melted down. The only thing they overlooked was the video. They didn't plan for collapse at free fall.
@AlNouveau How is the evidence all gone, You have all the hundreds of people still involved alive, all knowing what happened. How are you going to assure none of these people say a word, ever. How are you going to guarentee they don't just break down with guilt and admit everything, no matter the consequences? You give me the answer for this, cos anyone would have to factor in these scenarios and possibilities..
@ytcf71 And...how would you initiate and ask people to take part in such an atrocity. What if you ask people, no matter how covert the ranks, and they don't want to take part. Out of all the people that did take part (if it did happen) there would be an equal or larger amount that would have refused - but these people still know about it. So how would you do this, and make it water tight...?
Do you see now how stupid the idea is?. Its IMPOSSIBLE to pull off anything of this magnitude.
@ytcf71 It happened. The buildings fell, wars started. Everything changed. Our new Pearl Harbor. It all happened. But the only way to find the answers to your questions is to ask the people who did it. To do that you need a new independent investigation. That's why free fall is important.
@AlNouveau Im not interested in that, Im hypothesising. I wan't to know how you would do it. I can't think of a way to do it, or anyone else I ask, nor will you. And we're not the goverment, which have people far cleverer than you or I, so I don't assume they would try such a scheme which has so many ways to fail.
OMFG really? This is a controlled demolition I can tell by using my eyes and having common sense. Damaged caused by the other building falling did not cause building 7 to fall like it did. The controlled bombs planted inside building 7 caused it to collapse. Anyone who believes otherwise is clearly a fool.
wow you people just keep on an on speculation after speculation. i bet NONE of you took into account that the blast they heard right before the building came down was in fact was the explosion of the centrally located (large i might add) boilers and oxigen systems when those babies go they can cause extreme damage(ive witnessed this before) so i believe that to be the reason of the collaspe of an already severely wounded building. no controlled this nor that its all just crazy talk
@restlessbreed10 Also, does it really matter if they said "we're going to bring the building down" or not? It was too damaged to refurbish. It had to come down anyway. Gravity took care of one of the jobs needed to be done later.
from the 25 rules of dis-information by H. Michael Sweeney. #5~sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule, also known as attack the messenger ploy. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks" "conspriacy buffs" "religious fanatics" and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. Watch for these dis-info agents and when identified, expose them immediately. 9/11 truth 2010.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"The truth is there is only a few who supported the governments official story"
Oh, I see. So all the rest of the thousands of physicists in the world know what REALLY happened but are remaining silent for some reason. Sure bet. At least you're not suffering from paranoia. LOL
There isn't tens of thousands of physicists who disagree with the truth movement. The truth is there is only a few who supported the governments official story and there are over a thousand who have signed a petition for a new investigation into 9/11. Lets be honest.
"It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics"
- Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret)
Karen is a true patriot and genuine American hero.
Those who turn their backs on the truth are cowards and traitors.
"The issue of knowing who was behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the "official" story ... has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, and the repeal of habeas corpus (a fundamental point of law that has been with us since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215)" - David L. Griscom, PhD
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ya gotta love how the truth movement is still growing. Many people are still waking up and realising that 9/11 was an inside job. All 3 WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ya gotta love how the conspiracy kooks claim they're on the side of physics and then proceed to completely misapply it. No wonder the tens of thousands of physicists don't support the kooks. Oh wait! According to the kooks, that's because all the physicists in the world are "controlled" and are remaining silent even though they know what REALLY happened. Yeah, that's it. That makes perfect sense. Hahahahahaha
Ya gotta love how the conspiracy kooks claim theyre on the side of physics and then proceed to completely misapply it. No wonder the tens of thousands of physicists dont support the kooks. Oh wait! According to the kooks, thats because all the physicists in the world are controlled and are remaining silent even though they know what REALLY happened. Yeah, thats it. That makes perfect sense.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ya gotta love how the conspiracy kooks claim they're on the side of physics and then proceed to completely misapply it. No wonder the tens of thousands of physicists don't support the kooks. Oh wait! According to the kooks, that's because all the physicists in the world are "controlled" and are remaining silent even though they know what REALLY happened. Yeah, that's it. That makes perfect sense. Hahahahahaha
There are no scientific theories involved in explaining the demise of the 3 towers, therefore, there's little room for debate.
What happened to them is governed by the *laws of physics* (not theory)
On the other hand, steadfastly *believing* the outrageous conspiracy theory that 10 hijackers brought down 3 NYC skyscrapers, at near free-fall speed, through the path of most resistance, with 2 airplanes, is the leap of faith, of a misguided fool.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And the truth movement keeps on growing people. Don't let the shills try and disinform you. Think for yourself. Use physics, logic, and common sense. Don't believe in fairy tails with fantasy Muslims with boxcutters nor pancake theories that fall at freefall speed.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around that fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around that fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around the fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming.
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around the fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The truth movement is still growing. More people are still learning the truth everyday. Shills are still continuing their constant message posting of lies to disinform the public. It is an obvious "damage control" tactic. They are very desperate. They fear what the public could do if enough of us are aware of the truth. The truth is many of us are already aware of the truth and the government should be careful of what they do because we can start nationwide riots that will change everything.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Beware of conspiracy kooks who cite polls. Most people believe the Bush Admin tried to cover up its incompetence and lack of preparedness. But the kooks want you to believe that these people also believe the towers collapsed from pre-planted explosives. The reality is that you'd be lucky to get 2% who believe that. More people believe in Creationism and ghosts.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Beware of conspiracy kooks who cite polls. Most people believe the Bush Admin tried to cover up its incompetence and lack of preparedness. But the kooks want you to believe that these people also believe the towers collapsed from pre-planted explosives. The reality is that you'd be lucky to get 2% who believe that. More people believe in Creationism and ghosts.
There are no videos or eyewitness accounts that are evidence of a controlled demolition. It's the intentional misinterpretation of the videos and accounts that forms the basis of the conspiracy theories.
Beware of conspiracy kooks who cite polls. Most people believe the Bush Admin tried to cover up its incompetence and lack of preparedness. But the kooks want you to believe that these people also believe the towers collapsed from pre-planted explosives. The reality is that you'd be lucky to get 2% who believe that. More people believe in Creationism and ghosts.
If you've had your fill of these crappy conspiracy videos & web sites that distort the truth & omit inconvenient facts, here's a good site that debunks all the conspiracy claims & covers everything from the structural analyses to the FDNY concerns to the stupidity about thermite charges. If you want to get beyond the garbage videos and pseudo-science, check out this site. Its full of links to academic journals, trade association magazines, & other legit sources.
'Architects and Engineers for 9/II Truth recentIy received acknowIedgement from the FBl's counterterrorism division, which concIuded that the organization's core evidence deserves - and wiII get - FBl scrutiny. ln a Ietter, Deputy Director MichaeI Heimbach assessed AE 911's presentation as "backed by thorough research and anaIysis.'
- SiIicon WeekIy
Eight four percent reject offcial 9/II story in NYT/CBS News PoII.
Don't Iet a misguided minority stand in the way of justice.
Residues of an incendiary Thermate was found in WTC7's dust and that doesn't produce the same noise as conventional demolition charges. It's obvious WTC7 was a controlled demolition. NIST even admitted on one occasion that their analysis as to why it collapsed had a 'low probability' of occurring. Controlled demolition is the only possible explanation as to how a building could have fallen so symmetrically, through the path of greatest resistance at near-freefall speed.
jaceklupl, there WERE explosive sounds and big flashes as well, but they were digitally removed from the videos. That's obvious. The firemen who said the building was unstable and that they expected it to collapse are a bunch of liars. That's obvious. And even though none of the videos show the back side of WTC 7, we can just assume it collapsed at the same time as the front. Buildings can't collapse in sections. That's obvious. Wake up!
ARE PEOPLE FUCKIN BLIND????? THAT WAS CLEARLY A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
Jesse Ventura made a good point when he said that if a fire can bring down a skyscraper, then how come the government isnt making sure all over the world that no skyscrapers have hot plates or smoking because appearntly a fire on a few floors can bring down massive skyscrapers
It would be better to make sure all buildings had correct fireproofing of the steel in case the sprinklers failed, like in WTC 7. Did you know that WTC 7 had fireproofing of the steel rated for 2 hours (burned for 7 hours), and that it relied on the sprinkler system, but the water supply was severed by the collapse of the towers? Why would a building need fireproofing of the steel, if a fire could not cause it to collapse?
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
The large corporations ALREADY control everything, why do you think there's been a shift from publicly owned to Privatized? So, you will have no say in what they do.
The whole Foundation of EVERY "official Story" believer: 'We hate muslims, muslims are different than us, so therefore who cares about physics, let's go kill some muslims.'
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You thought I was serious? i was making fun of people like you who think the government is to blame for everything. So get rid of the government and what do you have? The corporations. Get it now?
I have no idea where you get that Muslim thing. You just made it up. BTW, I don't think the vast majority of physicists are on your side. Oh, I know - they're all paid off or "controlled," right? LOL
You thought I was serious? i was making fun of people like you who think the government is to blame for everything. So get rid of the government and what do you have? The corporations. Get it now?
I have no idea where you get that Muslim thing. You just made it up. BTW, I don't think the vast majority of physicists are on your side. Oh, I know - they're all paid off or "controlled," right? LOL
i think we should all rally up and overthrow the government--its in the constitution we have the power to do so. but really whats going to happen, is the sheeple and goats whatever you want to call it, will just end up sitting in front of the tube waiting for the next coverup to agree with! whatever!
you guys want to see some real nice stuff? look up the family ties between the bush family (from the late 80s early 90s btw) and the bin ladins. amazing how nobody thought to reveal that they were in negotiations for oil and in bed with all kinds of deals. the info war is on, and yes, the sheeple are waking. as TheDocumentaryZone stated. poetry hound is who i will be laughing at as i bury his disease infested body from the havoc that the elite are going to wreak on this country.
what makes it funny, is if all buildings collapsed under extreme heat, and bodies were dismantled, and broken everywhere, how did the paper passports survive the fire.Must of been extremem heat. and where are the wings and tail of the plane?do this experiment. take your 3 bucks go buy cheapest pan you can at dollar store.light it in the barbeque or fire pit, & keep burning it all night.let it burn 4 hours.I guarantee u will come back on here &tell me it did not even melt!def. not in 10 mins
"PoetryHound", If you're getting paid to "debunk" the 9-11 truth movement, you should be advised that you are an accomplice to the 9-11 cover-up and will be tried for high treason when we finally take this country back, so keep the smart-ass comments coming, because you won't be able to hide behind allegations of "anti-semitism" when the sheeple become aware of who really did 9-11.
Don't forget that these sheeple are losing their jobs and their homes and will soon know that it's the Jews....
47 storey buildings don't collapse because of fires. Full stop.
historypoliticsbb 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@anilsadaram LMAO! So according to your "expert" opinion it only took 2 weeks to place explosives in WTC 7? Kind of a short time period, even for a 911 twoofer. 911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To end this conspiracy I have an idea. I think a responsible US citizen can file a case in court to pvt investigate 2 weeks traffic recordings from all entries and exits of WTC before the demolition happened, and the video recordings of all exits and entries of building 7 between the time period of WTC and building 7 collapse.You will find the specific vans going in and out of those buildings for sure, and also find controlled demolition team from building 7. If you remove I will keep posting.
anilsadaram 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the UNEDITED version of the building 7 collapse can be found at ItWasTyped. com
see for yourself how it did NOT free fall, it collapsed progressively. Look under the 'conspiracy theory' section and find the Building 7 post. Definitive proof that conspiracy theorists are WRONG. Haha!
culturebully3 2 months ago
Oh this is hilarious. You actually show the full video of the top of Building 7 progressively collapse from left to right AND it's somehow STILL a conspiracy.
Primordialfan1 3 months ago
''only a few small fires inside''.
Yeah that's total and utter bullshit.
debunking911(dot)com/WTC7_Smoke.jpg
So one entire side of the building billowing smoke = ''a few small fires''.
You truther idiots.
Primordialfan1 3 months ago
Always they are talking about the twin towers never remembering building 7 because it very embarasing, think there was a 3rd plane which shood being crashed on the building 7 and it never reach the objectif
koforeverk2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@koforeverk2..."think there was a 3rd plane which shood being crashed on the building 7 and it never reach the objectif"......
-------
I bet you dont get paid to think, do you?
marksman500 3 months ago
Building 7 was a controlled demolition job and so were the twin towers. I believe the architects and engineers and even demolition experts who say that it was a controlled demolition job. And I believe the firemen and other eyewitnesses who say they heard explosions going off in the buildings repeatedly.
P0ETRYHOUND 3 months ago
@P0ETRYHOUND.."I believe the architects and engineers and even demolition experts who say that it was a controlled demolition job."...
-----
You are not poetryhound, why are you using poetryhounds name?
marksman500 3 months ago
Anyone who doesn't know by now that the 3 buildings were controlled demolition jobs are really ignorant sheep.
caferisque 3 months ago
@caferisque.."the 3 buildings were controlled demolition jobs".
---
Really?..that's odd because a diverse group of hundreds of experts in tall building design, steel structure behavior, fire protection engineering, blast effects, and structural investigations have studied the collapses.
These are some of the best engineers in the world & after yrs of intense study, they “ALL” have come up with a perfectly logical, scientific explanation for what happened.
So where do you disagree with them?
marksman500 3 months ago
Building 7 was an obvious controlled demolition job.
P0ETRYHOUND 3 months ago
Do a search for Skull and Bones people. Seriously, if you don't know what that is just by reading this comment...then you are WAY behind in life. Catch up.
Truewinner01 4 months ago
Also: Look for this video: 4409 -- (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle!
I can simply rest my case.. this building is blown apart from the inside.. also, I have seen all the angels and I've seen no major damage from antelnnes or anything.. and plase.. why only the WTC buildings.. there are so many buildings there.
Bedmen1 4 months ago
honestly all anyone has to do is type in on youtube "demolition compare" and watch videos of controlled demolitions compared to building 7....there is no way you can tell me that even tho one building came down from apparent fire damage,and one building came down from explosives,that they would both fall down at almost the exact same speed and the same style,a pancake collapse....
newyorkyanks22 4 months ago
Sorry to burst your bubble but fire that hot and and does make huge beam in a structure fail and ultimately collapse.
PaHughes1993 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
Clearly controlled demolition.
TheBrewchief 4 months ago
Whatever was in that building couldn't be extracted. So they decided to demo the whole thing. What if 9-11 was a cover for this to happen. They couldn't just pull it for no reason. They needed a diversion
fccwatch 4 months ago
DEMOLITION!!!
homer30 4 months ago
Cutting the clip just before you see the cables for "pulling". That is so fucking dishonest.
Daghead 4 months ago
@Daghead CABLES FOR PULLING? WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT...ARE U SUGGESTING THAT THEY WERE GONNA PULL IT DOWN WITH CABLES? HAHAHA
AntBanks2626 4 months ago
@AntBanks2626 Um yeah. Find the whole clip, dipshit.
Daghead 4 months ago
Human beings have perpertrated atrocities since our beginning; holocaust, the crusades, genocides, pillages, wars etc. so what's the big deal? just embrace yourselves for the next ones to come. It's what we humans do best
born912 4 months ago
@orangon How can you be right when you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist with no evidence? LMAO You can't state something is true without evidence. dumbass
theBartone9119 4 months ago
@theBartone9119 zogbot trolls, patriotards and other assorted douchestains like yourself, all scared of a new investigation for their respective reasons. lol
grasshopperjunction 4 months ago
@grasshopperjunction No one's afraid of another investigation, but conspiracy kooktards will be disappointed when the investigation doesn't support their fruitcakery. LMAO
PoetryHound 4 months ago
@orangon "The fact is, you don't know anything about 911"
Google: "Bridging The Gap: Building 7 - Club Conspiracy Forums", I wrote that whole piece.
Telling me I don't know anything about 911, is like telling Jordan he can't dunk a basket lol
theBartone9119 4 months ago
@orangon "I guess everyone's entitled to their opinion, it kind of angers me because I was there...I was here and you weren't. I think they have no respect for all the friends of mine that I lost, and all the people that died that day.. it's like a slap in their face" - Lietenant Frank Papalia (FDNY, 1998 - 2006)
That man is a patriot. You are lunatic.
theBartone9119 4 months ago
@orangon Deep inside I know you are a tool.Google: "Bridging The Gap: Building 7 - Club Conspiracy Forums". I wrote a piece on Building 7 that should educated your small warped mind. There is no official story either, I don't believe stories, I believe physics and science, and they all support what happened that day. Only fools believe this garbage that isn't backed up by shit. I am not a sheep, you are the sheep, I am the farmer, here to enter the stable and smack you around. Read my WTC7 piece
theBartone9119 4 months ago
That's exactly why the US and Nato just put AlQueda into government in Lybia.. Who ya all think the so called rebels are? So who is the enemy now? Read the news. They say it. Just most people are too ignorant to catch it. Not to mention that the first responders (the real heros) are not allowed there this year.. Its because too many of them woke up and started to realize how corrupt our leaders have gotten.... And 70% of food in our stores is GMO.. No wonder cancer rates are going crazy.
bigbadk55 5 months ago
"I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I am an engineer and i conclude Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition." - Over thousands and thousands of experts.
Ignore the dis-info shills on here.
Listen to what this man (witness has to say).
/watch?v=_DuSeuxjiJQ
ZionistsRunTheGov 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As long as all these conspiracy theory wackos do is chat on the internet in their basments, they're harmless.
claton95 5 months ago
this is the only time in history in which a huge plane filled with jet fuel has hit a building that size, so how can anyone say, let alone people with no sort of qualifications to make these kinds of statements, that its impossible for the building to collapse? And thus the confirmation bias arrises, cause no matter how little evidence truthers have, they cant even concede the point that maybe, just maybe, buildings like these were not designed to withstand such circumstances
HyrulianWarlord 6 months ago
@HyrulianWarlord Edna Citron proved the jet fuel was burned up almost instantly
Edna Citron could stand in the fire. But steel melted.
eDemocracyUK 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EVERYBODY KNOWS THE JEWS PLANNED, EXECUTED AND COVERED-UP 9/11!!!!
* The "five dancing Israelis" arrested with explosives and artwork of plane crashing in to buildings.
* Jew Chertoff oversaw the "enquiry" and didn't even mention Building 7.
* Israeli TV Jews admit "we were there to record the event"
* Jew Silverstein OWNED the WTC buildings and could let his Jew friends plant the Thermite based explosives, now PROVEN by Danish Scientists, was used.
THE JEWS DID 9/11!!! IT'S A FACT!!!!
Watch911MissingLinks 7 months ago
Screw this that's an implosion no doubt about, u guys got screwed by the big boys
dontdoitnow 8 months ago
Everyone I talk to never heard of building 7, what happened with the media not getting that information out that Building 7 was demolished! We hear about the twin towers and how it was first attacked in 1992 with the help of inside FBI informants, but building 7, nothing! Why did they blow up Building 7.Why, why, why. Was it too old, did it need a new pay job and why blow it up at the same time that two planes crashed the twin towers.Why set Building 7 to come down as Bin L crashed two planes.
Jai666666666 8 months ago
@Jai666666666 Motive is Insurance & Bank fraud among many other frauds I have the inside story.Unfortunately the perps. R still at large because of BS (Barry Soetoro).SPGFunds Silverstein Properties Group is one of many joint venture private public partnerships brokered by the real mastermind of 911.He can be seen from the back on my featured vid. Larry gazing lovingly at their coup of 7 bil $ ins. $ accessed. The kicker is ins. for the CIA.&DHS$ MINE! UBS merging into USBancorpPiperJaffray. HRS
HoneySiegalSurvivor 6 months ago
@HoneySiegalSurvivor You don't know what you're talking about. Larry Silverstein was vindicated in the USCORP bank fraud case in AZ. But you are intentionally presenting fraudulent information. You belong back in the Clay County, Illinois jail. They only released you because of a clerical error. Besides, deceased people like you can't think straight.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@Jai666666666 1993*
Bhomein 6 months ago
America just fucked itself in the ass
ConsolesR3worked 8 months ago
So, FEMA arrived on MONDAY, Sept 10th. SILVERSTEIN, the new owner took out MASSIVE amounts of insurance on the complex BEFORE 911 AND building #7 was PULLED (a term for a controlled demolition). AND Mr. Silversteins' (15) million dollar investment NETTED him 7 or 8 BILLION dollars? Hmmmmmmmm......
TruthOldSchoolStyle 9 months ago
Building number 7 is the most obvious sign of controlled demolition for a few simple reasons:
1.The building wasn't hit by a plane so there is no reason for it to collapse in any way.
2. A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone and there is even no chance of fire breaching with a sprinkler-system. Building number 7 had a sprinkler system, it fights fire mechanically even when there's no electrical power.
Bedmen1 10 months ago 8
@Bedmen1 "A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone"
Really? Which highrise structural engineer or fire protection engineers says that?
"Building number 7 had a sprinkler system"
Water was cut off to it as a result of the tower collapses cutting the water main. That's according to the firefighters. Now that you know that, I assume you'll adjust your opinion of the collapse accordingly. Just kidding! You guys never adjust your views to the facts.
bagintree 10 months ago
@Bedmen1
The Kader toy factory (steel-framed, and concrete) Totally collapse due to fire alone.
TheFlyposter 10 months ago
@TheFlyposter Oh please.. .. a collapse of a roof like that! That's not a building like this at all!!! You can't compare that! Offcourse a roof like that falls down!
Bedmen1 10 months ago
@Bedmen1 The Kader toy factory totally collapsed, you stated no other steel framed building has collapsed due to fire alone, therefore you are now shifting the goal posts.
"A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone"
TheFlyposter 10 months ago
@TheFlyposter lol that is bullshit.
MisterPeetBull 10 months ago
@Bedmen1...". Building number 7 had a sprinkler system, it fights fire mechanically even when there's no electrical power."....
------
The collapse of the two towers caused many main waterlines to burst and there was was not any water going to WTC 7....There was not enough water for the firemen to fight the fire, thats why it burned all day.
marksman500 10 months ago
@Bedmen1 no, the debris from WTC 1/2 drilled 2 of its support columns. God you fucking hippies are stupid.
Bhomein 6 months ago
@Bhomein Yup.Column 79 and column 82. The hippies wouldn't know that though, they are scared of specifics when discussing 911.
theBartone9119 5 months ago
@Bhomein However, it wasn't the debris that caused the failures specifically, it was the trusses around the columns that failed which caused the buckling of those 2 columns. You got the just of it though lol
theBartone9119 5 months ago
Comment removed
newyorkyanks22 4 months ago
@Bhomein You got to wake up from the Bush spell, dude.
cheddar21 4 months ago 7
@cheddar21 I hate bush, buts its outrageous to think that he caused 9/11. He didnt gain anything from it, so why kill thousands of innocent people.
Bhomein 4 months ago
@Bedmen1 1. "It (Building 7) wasn't hit by a plane, but it was hit by debris from the North Tower when it fell" - Dylan Avery (Creator of Loose Change)
2. WTC had a sprinkler system, but had many single-point vulnerabilities for failure. Building 7 had no concrete core and used a long span floor truss system. The fire proofing was only tested for 2 hours and the fire lasted 7.
Building 7 was obviously not a controlled demolition.
theBartone9119 5 months ago
@Bedmen1 "A building with a steel/concrete structure cannot collapse caused by fire alone and there is even no chance of fire breaching with a sprinkler-system."
1. A building CAN collapse from fire alone, certainly.
2. Building 7's sprinkler system failed due to the water mains breaking when the twin towers collapsed.
There was no water to fight the fires and the entire building was abandoned and left to burn. It was expected to collapse by fire fighters and other first responders.
DanSVT03 4 months ago
@Bedmen1 WTC 7 was hit by the anntena of the north tower when it fell, creating a huge gash down the fron tof the building, weakening its structure. when it got hit by the debris, and got torn open by the antena, it started fired inside the building. when the antena hit, it broke 90% of the sprinkler system in the building, and the 10% that was left, didnt do the job. the building also burn for around 7 hrs. a long time, the steel finaly got to a point, and i failed. WTC 7 fell at around 5.p.m
tampabaybucs7 4 months ago
@tampabaybucs7
lol.. are you kidding
DDF2059 4 months ago
@tampabaybucs7 Look for the video: ae911truth (9-9-10) SidebySide Demolition Compare Proof WashDC Debate
There are your scientists.. think about it: why do all of these buildings fall straight down? A collapse would start out in a section of the building, not all at ones.
Bedmen1 4 months ago
@Bedmen1 Oh, a steel building CAN collapse from fire alone. Hot steel already loses strength way before it starts to melt. Steel doesn't have to melt in order for a building to collapse, you idiots!
Conspiracy twats should learn real physics instead of using that piss-poor pseudoscience rubbish that they have learned in college dorms.They bring a bad light on science. It's embarrassing. Read a book, read a book, read a fucking physics book! ;)
StandingRedPanda 4 months ago
@StandingRedPanda WOW YOUR AN IDIOT! YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT WITH NO BRAIN...DID YOU EVEN GO TO COLLEGE? GET A DEGREE FOR YOURSELF BEFORE YOU START CRITICIZING OTHERS...LARRY SILVERSTEIN ADMITTED TO IT YOU FUCKING LITTLE DICK PUSSY OF A MAN...YOU OBVIOUSLY DIDNT KNOW ANYONE IN THOSE TOWERS BECAUSE IF IT WERE YOUR BROTHER OR MOM YOU WOULD HAVE A DIFFERENT OUTLOOK ON ALL OF THIS OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE....GO JUMP OF SOMETHING HIGH U WASTE OF OXYGEN
AntBanks2626 4 months ago
3. If a plane would hit the building it still would not collapse. I can support this with facts:
“The Bijlmerramp” was an accident in the Netherlands where a jumbo jet in 1992 in fact DID hit an apartment building in Amsterdam and still it did not collapse except for the small part it did actually destroy by the crash itself.
So it is clear: a building that does NOT suffer a plane impact does NOT collapse
Bedmen1 10 months ago
@Bedmen1 "it is clear: a building that does NOT suffer a plane impact does NOT collapse"
Well, millions of structures have collapsed from fire over the centuries and they weren't hit by a plane. So were all of them demolition jobs?
bagintree 10 months ago
@Bedmen1 The plane was traveling at landing speed, not full speed, The building is of a completely different design, the plane has lost 3 of it's engines (the weightiest, and strongest part, that causes most damage), the pilot dumped his fuel for a crash landing, and yet the building still suffered significant partial collapse.
Bad comparison.
TheFlyposter 10 months ago
So what if it was controlled demo. Let the other shoe. You know the US is taking measures to insure our prosperity and that for generations to come...you know that the USA will be a big player in the NWO...and you like the NWO...that is why you haven't left this country.
You might whine to ease your conscious that can't handle the truth, but you will stay in this country.
So shut up and accept the truth like a man.
TheGoalSetter 11 months ago
daaa fuuuuuuuccccckkkkkkkkkk
tagliareni 11 months ago
Building 7 was an obvious controlled demolition job. The Twin Towers were also controlled demolitions too.
BuxomBabeXOXO 11 months ago
This is crap 9/11 was controlled by the government.under bulding 7 was a nuclear safe zone for people if there was ever a nuclear war.they blew down this bulding also a couple weeks or a month before they double the insurance on those two buldings.it was controlled by our gov.
cginsberg94 11 months ago
Many buildings are designed to implode or fall as straight down as possible to avoid damage to surrounding buildings in the event of severe structural damage or compromise. There are people known as Engineers who are far smarter and competent than the idiots who theorize conspiracy shit. Good Engineer = Planned ahead for crappy things, Conspiracy Theorists for the most part = fail... fail...fail.
jbratcherman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anybody want to debate me on xbox live about 9/11??? im a conspiracy theorist.
ive been in debates with all sorts of people and never lost a single one to this day send me a party invite/add me incase im not on, i dont care who you are how many of your friends you want in the debate whatever works as long as its not a bunch of 9year olds screaming. by the way the debate will start with WTC7.
TheWeaponsmith69 1 year ago
you guys gotta plaster these videos all over facebook and blow this wide open
marhoekful 1 year ago
@marhoekful ya that way you can have something for once to credit yourself for!
gkent101 1 year ago
@gkent101 You bet....thats what its all about. Not about avoiding concentration camps, and mind controlled robots, soldiers and police.
marhoekful 1 year ago
@marhoekful At 1:04 the WTC 7 began to collapse. 7 was on the ground at 1:16 so there's you're proof that it was not a controlled demo. On all controlled demolitions you have loud booms you can hear a mile away. There were no booms and the guy who put up the video conveniently didnt have sound when cameras were closer to building 7.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077 Are you a christian?
marhoekful 1 year ago
@marhoekful No. What does that have to do with anything? If you'd rather change the subject, which is what you're trying to do, then go ahead. People who do so usually do it because they can't explain why they're wrong. It doesn't change the fact that there were no booms or flashes on building 7. Oh not to mention that it didn't fall on it's footprint as Loose Change claims.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077 There is a whole society of Architects, engineers, physics professor, metallurgists, who have determined the only way these buildings came down the way they did, was with explosives, they even have phsyical evidence in the form of unexploded explosive residue in the dust. You are overwhelmed by the prospect of such a conspiracy......this creates denial as a coping mechanism.
marhoekful 1 year ago
@marhoekful Wrong on all counts. There have been ZERO structural engineers or experts for that matter that have said explosives were used. And if you're going to mention the joke that is AE911Truth, it's a sham, Richard Gage doesn't even do his own investigation at all.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
fires hot.. what does heat do?.. nvm there's no point in trying to explain. lol
SmubiHD 1 year ago
911 was an obvious inside job
werdskantxpress 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ironically this was the Solomon Brothers building and supposedly Solomon was wise (until the women). And this is the reductio ad absurdum of the whole thing. This is what changed my mind. And there are lots like me.
GhostofCliffGullett 1 year ago
Building 7 and the Twin Towers were controlled demolition jobs blamed on Muslim terrorists with boxcutters.
P0ETRYHOUND 1 year ago
Comment removed
P0ETRYHOUND 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was a controlled demolition job.
bIackjerryboymetaI 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is widely known throughout the world that 9/11 was an inside job.
HoIlowPsycho 1 year ago
I love how they say that bombs went off when you can very clearly hear no explosions in the clip
Furthermore why would the government blow up wtc 7. Did they really think that would be the final straw for the american people.
"Steve terrorists blew up the Twin towers and pentagon"
"Dont Care"
"AND BUILDING 7!!!""
"WHAT?!?!? TO WAR!!!!!"
And building seven and the towers collapsed in visually different ways. And yet they're evidently both done using the same materials and tactics. Uh no
fads90 1 year ago
@fads90 thanks for saying something sensible in this
gkent101 1 year ago
The substation under WTC 7 had a caisson foundation designed to carry the weight of a future building of "25 stories" containing 600,000 sq ft.
WTC 7 was built over that existing substation and ended up being "47 stories" containing 1,868,000 sq ft....(Almost Double in size)
They had to RIG the columns and floor trusses to support the larger design, especially on floors 5-7, which were of corse at the bottom of the bldg.
marksman500 1 year ago
Watch the penthouse collapse @ 1:04, then 6 seconds later, the building collapses.
MrCone223 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Building#7 could have burned and burned until all of the material was gone and the steel structure that was fire proofed with coated asbestos would be remaining. One corner was damaged but that would not cause the entire structure to fall completely vertically. Or even collapse at all. The Main Footings are NOT at the corners people. Get real already.
You are stupid if you believe that building 7 was Not a controlled demolition! It was a perfectly executed demolition! lol it is so00O! obvious.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
Taking a good amount of time to set up a controlled demolition isnt nearly as difficult as totally defying all known laws of physics.
When you are presented with a total impossibility versus a far fetched (at the time ) theory there really isnt much choice is there?
The USA has a history of false flag operations and this was one of them.
zenoist2 1 year ago
so larry silverstein? you decided to PULL IT? i tell you what larry your demolishen crew should be in the guiness book of records?
marmoratus 1 year ago
Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper and part of the World Trade Center complex, was
not struck by a plane but collapsed in 6.5 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on September 11th, in
the exact manner of a controlled demolition.
Fight4Privacy 1 year ago
Reading more comments posted here i keep on seeing people ask. Where is the proof of the controlled demolition? Well i ask in return where is the proof that it wasn't? I know it takes a good amount of time to set up controlled demos and would be extemely hard to hide. Also people have asked how would they know to even plant bombs in 7? Guess what i don't have all the answers but i know that the only way that building fell was because of controlled demolition not by fire.
darknessrising999 1 year ago
@darknessrising999 Its nothing to do with the time to set up a CD. The issue is it would take a team of say 20 men a couple of weeks to do this, in an EMPTY building. In the twin towers, they would have to bring all the explosives and machinery in, open up walls, fit the bombs, run the wires, hide them all, close up the walls, replaster, repaint them, tidy up, so there was no evidence, and without making any noise, so none of the hundreds of people who work there 24/7 would notice a thing...
ytcf71 1 year ago
@ytcf71 When you don't know what explosive was used or how it was installed it's difficult to know how difficult it was or how long it took. You're just guessing. But with WTC7 there's lots of good video, so there's lots of proof and no guessing required. It dropped at free fall which is characteristic of CD, not fire... Thanks.
AlNouveau 1 year ago
@AlNouveau Its irrelevent. It would need to be installed covertly, and unless it was magicced there by elves, it will need x amount of people, with tools, and equipment, and noise - No guessing, common sense. You just can't answer my question and simple logic that is all.
ytcf71 1 year ago
@ytcf71 That's an amazing statement. You know absolutely nothing about the structure, or the security or who had access. Or what kind of explosives could have been used, how it could have been placed or detonated. You don't know how the fires started or where. You don't know why the structure failed or why there was no search of the debris for explosives. You know Jack about anything yet you claim that CD is impossible. Your name George Bush? You want to discuss you better bring more than that.
AlNouveau 1 year ago
@AlNouveau.....once again another Conspiracy theorist running away from common sense. FACT - Public in the building - FACT, people would need to fit the explosives - FACT - Public in the building would see people fitting the explosives -
I dont care if the explosives are made out of invisible cheese and the security guards can fly - no one would take the risk of such a hairbrained scheme actually being pulled off without a hitch or anyone noticing.
ytcf71 1 year ago
@ytcf71 Where have I heard this BS before, "no one would take the risk of such a hairbrained scheme" you mean like hijacking commercial aircraft to crash into buildings armed with box cutters. You must be Conoleezza Rice.
AlNouveau 1 year ago
@AlNouveau Hijacking a plane is crazy yes, but so is killing yourself doing it, so not really the same comparison to thinking the government trying to concoct the largest misdemeanour ever, which is bound to fail from so many variables, and could bring their downfall at any time in the future if any of the people involved speak out.
ytcf71 1 year ago
@AlNouveau Lets pretend you are in charge of this whole operation. How would you make sure every person involved (thousands, from planning to end result) never says a word? How would you make sure no evidence could ever be found? How would you make sure no one in the WTC ever noticed any explosives being fitted?
Imagine you order the workers to plant the explosives, and the team asks you 'what if somebody sees us'......What is your reply to them, or how are you going to prevent this?
ytcf71 1 year ago
@ytcf71 I'd do exactly what they did, shock and awe. By the time it (shock and awe) wore off all the evidence would be gone, carted away and melted down. The only thing they overlooked was the video. They didn't plan for collapse at free fall.
AlNouveau 1 year ago
@AlNouveau How is the evidence all gone, You have all the hundreds of people still involved alive, all knowing what happened. How are you going to assure none of these people say a word, ever. How are you going to guarentee they don't just break down with guilt and admit everything, no matter the consequences? You give me the answer for this, cos anyone would have to factor in these scenarios and possibilities..
ytcf71 1 year ago
@ytcf71 And...how would you initiate and ask people to take part in such an atrocity. What if you ask people, no matter how covert the ranks, and they don't want to take part. Out of all the people that did take part (if it did happen) there would be an equal or larger amount that would have refused - but these people still know about it. So how would you do this, and make it water tight...?
Do you see now how stupid the idea is?. Its IMPOSSIBLE to pull off anything of this magnitude.
ytcf71 1 year ago
@ytcf71 It happened. The buildings fell, wars started. Everything changed. Our new Pearl Harbor. It all happened. But the only way to find the answers to your questions is to ask the people who did it. To do that you need a new independent investigation. That's why free fall is important.
AlNouveau 1 year ago
@AlNouveau Im not interested in that, Im hypothesising. I wan't to know how you would do it. I can't think of a way to do it, or anyone else I ask, nor will you. And we're not the goverment, which have people far cleverer than you or I, so I don't assume they would try such a scheme which has so many ways to fail.
ytcf71 1 year ago
OMFG really? This is a controlled demolition I can tell by using my eyes and having common sense. Damaged caused by the other building falling did not cause building 7 to fall like it did. The controlled bombs planted inside building 7 caused it to collapse. Anyone who believes otherwise is clearly a fool.
darknessrising999 1 year ago
Hi kooks, having fun talking shit with other kooks?
tremooloo 1 year ago
wow you people just keep on an on speculation after speculation. i bet NONE of you took into account that the blast they heard right before the building came down was in fact was the explosion of the centrally located (large i might add) boilers and oxigen systems when those babies go they can cause extreme damage(ive witnessed this before) so i believe that to be the reason of the collaspe of an already severely wounded building. no controlled this nor that its all just crazy talk
restlessbreed10 1 year ago
@restlessbreed10 Also, does it really matter if they said "we're going to bring the building down" or not? It was too damaged to refurbish. It had to come down anyway. Gravity took care of one of the jobs needed to be done later.
promagnum 1 year ago
@restlessbreed10 so even the engineers & architects who formed a group which claims s it s a controlled demolition are crazy?
"Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth"
keulekavlinski 1 year ago
from the 25 rules of dis-information by H. Michael Sweeney. #5~sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule, also known as attack the messenger ploy. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks" "conspriacy buffs" "religious fanatics" and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. Watch for these dis-info agents and when identified, expose them immediately. 9/11 truth 2010.
babybluesnowden 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"The truth is there is only a few who supported the governments official story"
Oh, I see. So all the rest of the thousands of physicists in the world know what REALLY happened but are remaining silent for some reason. Sure bet. At least you're not suffering from paranoia. LOL
PoetryHound 2 years ago
The "Six Pillars" (Dwain Deets NASA) that prove CD beyond a reasonable doubt are
Horizontal ejections of multi-ton steel sections up to 600 ft at 60 mph
Asymmetrical damage resulting in symmetrical "collapse"
"Collapse" at near free-fall acceleration
Positive identification of Nano-Thermite
Tons of molten iron under all three structures
Temperatures well above those possible in a hydrocarbon fire under the alleged conditions
Go to A&E for 9/11 Truth to get the facts.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
There isn't tens of thousands of physicists who disagree with the truth movement. The truth is there is only a few who supported the governments official story and there are over a thousand who have signed a petition for a new investigation into 9/11. Lets be honest.
P0ETRYHOUND 2 years ago
9/11 was an inside job. The governments official story has so many holes in it.
PoetryHownd 2 years ago
"It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics"
- Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret)
Karen is a true patriot and genuine American hero.
Those who turn their backs on the truth are cowards and traitors.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
"The issue of knowing who was behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the "official" story ... has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, and the repeal of habeas corpus (a fundamental point of law that has been with us since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215)" - David L. Griscom, PhD
Seek the truth or be a slave.
It's your choice.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
wtc7 always worrried me.
A crashing jet plane might well bring down a huge building, its a pretty much unknown thing .
Fires and their effects are known however and no planes hit wtc7.
It looks exactly like a controlled demolition even sagging slightly in the centre.
zenoist2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ya gotta love how the truth movement is still growing. Many people are still waking up and realising that 9/11 was an inside job. All 3 WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.
Joefreiheit 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ya gotta love how the conspiracy kooks claim they're on the side of physics and then proceed to completely misapply it. No wonder the tens of thousands of physicists don't support the kooks. Oh wait! According to the kooks, that's because all the physicists in the world are "controlled" and are remaining silent even though they know what REALLY happened. Yeah, that's it. That makes perfect sense. Hahahahahaha
PoetryHound 2 years ago
Ya gotta love how the conspiracy kooks claim theyre on the side of physics and then proceed to completely misapply it. No wonder the tens of thousands of physicists dont support the kooks. Oh wait! According to the kooks, thats because all the physicists in the world are controlled and are remaining silent even though they know what REALLY happened. Yeah, thats it. That makes perfect sense.
Hahahahahaha
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ya gotta love how the conspiracy kooks claim they're on the side of physics and then proceed to completely misapply it. No wonder the tens of thousands of physicists don't support the kooks. Oh wait! According to the kooks, that's because all the physicists in the world are "controlled" and are remaining silent even though they know what REALLY happened. Yeah, that's it. That makes perfect sense. Hahahahahaha
PoetryHound 2 years ago
There are no scientific theories involved in explaining the demise of the 3 towers, therefore, there's little room for debate.
What happened to them is governed by the *laws of physics* (not theory)
On the other hand, steadfastly *believing* the outrageous conspiracy theory that 10 hijackers brought down 3 NYC skyscrapers, at near free-fall speed, through the path of most resistance, with 2 airplanes, is the leap of faith, of a misguided fool.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And the truth movement keeps on growing people. Don't let the shills try and disinform you. Think for yourself. Use physics, logic, and common sense. Don't believe in fairy tails with fantasy Muslims with boxcutters nor pancake theories that fall at freefall speed.
Joefreiheit 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around that fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming
PoetryHound 2 years ago
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around that fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around the fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Only the conspiracy kooks think their ragtag "movement" is growing. There's no getting around the fact that the number of hits on 9/11 conspiracy web sites has plummeted since 2006. The number of people attending 9/11 conspiracy rallies and meetings has likewise plummeted. Even the number of YouTube videos with active arguments on them has plummeted. Yeah, the "movement" is growing. Keep dreaming.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The truth movement is still growing. More people are still learning the truth everyday. Shills are still continuing their constant message posting of lies to disinform the public. It is an obvious "damage control" tactic. They are very desperate. They fear what the public could do if enough of us are aware of the truth. The truth is many of us are already aware of the truth and the government should be careful of what they do because we can start nationwide riots that will change everything.
Joefreiheit 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The conspiracy kooks have no evidence of any "inside job" demolition plot, so they're reduced to repeating tired old slogans.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
The conspiracy kooks have no evidence of any "inside job" demolition plot, so they're reduced to repeating tired old slogans.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The conspiracy kooks have no evidence of any "inside job" demolition plot, so they're reduced to repeating tired old slogans.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
9/11 was a controlled demolition job. Don't believe the terrorists with boxcutters story.
Joefreiheit 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Beware of conspiracy kooks who cite polls. Most people believe the Bush Admin tried to cover up its incompetence and lack of preparedness. But the kooks want you to believe that these people also believe the towers collapsed from pre-planted explosives. The reality is that you'd be lucky to get 2% who believe that. More people believe in Creationism and ghosts.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Beware of conspiracy kooks who cite polls. Most people believe the Bush Admin tried to cover up its incompetence and lack of preparedness. But the kooks want you to believe that these people also believe the towers collapsed from pre-planted explosives. The reality is that you'd be lucky to get 2% who believe that. More people believe in Creationism and ghosts.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
The only evidence is in the videos and eyewitness accounts being as all the rubble was removed before it could be investigated.
These are obviously the natural targets for people to attempt to discredit.
Unfortunately peiople can see and hear with their own eyes and ears what happened which makes any official explanation total rubbish.
zenoist2 2 years ago
There are no videos or eyewitness accounts that are evidence of a controlled demolition. It's the intentional misinterpretation of the videos and accounts that forms the basis of the conspiracy theories.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Beware of conspiracy kooks who cite polls. Most people believe the Bush Admin tried to cover up its incompetence and lack of preparedness. But the kooks want you to believe that these people also believe the towers collapsed from pre-planted explosives. The reality is that you'd be lucky to get 2% who believe that. More people believe in Creationism and ghosts.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
If you've had your fill of these crappy conspiracy videos & web sites that distort the truth & omit inconvenient facts, here's a good site that debunks all the conspiracy claims & covers everything from the structural analyses to the FDNY concerns to the stupidity about thermite charges. If you want to get beyond the garbage videos and pseudo-science, check out this site. Its full of links to academic journals, trade association magazines, & other legit sources.
wtc7lies. googlepages. com
PoetryHound 2 years ago
'Architects and Engineers for 9/II Truth recentIy received acknowIedgement from the FBl's counterterrorism division, which concIuded that the organization's core evidence deserves - and wiII get - FBl scrutiny. ln a Ietter, Deputy Director MichaeI Heimbach assessed AE 911's presentation as "backed by thorough research and anaIysis.'
- SiIicon WeekIy
Eight four percent reject offcial 9/II story in NYT/CBS News PoII.
Don't Iet a misguided minority stand in the way of justice.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
It is obvious that building 7 was a demolition job. Buildings don't fall down symetrically like that unless it is a demolition job.
PoetryFound 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If it was controlled, why there were no explosions sounds? Look at any demolition movie, you can hear a lot of them
jaceklupl 2 years ago
Residues of an incendiary Thermate was found in WTC7's dust and that doesn't produce the same noise as conventional demolition charges. It's obvious WTC7 was a controlled demolition. NIST even admitted on one occasion that their analysis as to why it collapsed had a 'low probability' of occurring. Controlled demolition is the only possible explanation as to how a building could have fallen so symmetrically, through the path of greatest resistance at near-freefall speed.
CHIPSTERO7 2 years ago
jaceklupl, there WERE explosive sounds and big flashes as well, but they were digitally removed from the videos. That's obvious. The firemen who said the building was unstable and that they expected it to collapse are a bunch of liars. That's obvious. And even though none of the videos show the back side of WTC 7, we can just assume it collapsed at the same time as the front. Buildings can't collapse in sections. That's obvious. Wake up!
PoetryZound 2 years ago
Good point, jaceklupl. There were no sounds of explosions. I guess they used those magical "Hushaboom" brand explosives. LOL
PoetryHound 2 years ago
ARE PEOPLE FUCKIN BLIND????? THAT WAS CLEARLY A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
Jesse Ventura made a good point when he said that if a fire can bring down a skyscraper, then how come the government isnt making sure all over the world that no skyscrapers have hot plates or smoking because appearntly a fire on a few floors can bring down massive skyscrapers
CannabisExpress 2 years ago 5
@CannabisExpress
It would be better to make sure all buildings had correct fireproofing of the steel in case the sprinklers failed, like in WTC 7. Did you know that WTC 7 had fireproofing of the steel rated for 2 hours (burned for 7 hours), and that it relied on the sprinkler system, but the water supply was severed by the collapse of the towers? Why would a building need fireproofing of the steel, if a fire could not cause it to collapse?
TheFlyposter 10 months ago
LOL anyone that thinks that nothing more than a fire can do this to a 43-story steel building should never work in one!
Fact: The first three steel buildings in the history of the world to collapse from fire: WTC 1, WTC 2, WTC7 all on one day...
You've got to be fucking kidding me, I wonder which company did the demolition work?
Verbalmint 2 years ago
If you have questions or concerns raised by this video please ....
Check out this video from Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.
*911 Blueprint for Truth - With Richard Gage, AIA*
There are now 717 architects and engineers calling for a real investigation.
Please be sure to sign the petitions and support the efforts of NYCCAN.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
Please sign and help spread the word.
Many thanks.
1,575 signatures so far !!
cosmicmind1 2 years ago
Demolition
ash6660 2 years ago
Yeah, let's overthrow the government and just let the large corporations control everything. I'm sure we can trust them.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
Comment removed
k0ma1337 2 years ago
The large corporations ALREADY control everything, why do you think there's been a shift from publicly owned to Privatized? So, you will have no say in what they do.
The whole Foundation of EVERY "official Story" believer: 'We hate muslims, muslims are different than us, so therefore who cares about physics, let's go kill some muslims.'
Denniss7420 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You thought I was serious? i was making fun of people like you who think the government is to blame for everything. So get rid of the government and what do you have? The corporations. Get it now?
I have no idea where you get that Muslim thing. You just made it up. BTW, I don't think the vast majority of physicists are on your side. Oh, I know - they're all paid off or "controlled," right? LOL
PoetryHound 2 years ago
You thought I was serious? i was making fun of people like you who think the government is to blame for everything. So get rid of the government and what do you have? The corporations. Get it now?
I have no idea where you get that Muslim thing. You just made it up. BTW, I don't think the vast majority of physicists are on your side. Oh, I know - they're all paid off or "controlled," right? LOL
PoetryHound 2 years ago
i think we should all rally up and overthrow the government--its in the constitution we have the power to do so. but really whats going to happen, is the sheeple and goats whatever you want to call it, will just end up sitting in front of the tube waiting for the next coverup to agree with! whatever!
kprofscrts 2 years ago
you guys want to see some real nice stuff? look up the family ties between the bush family (from the late 80s early 90s btw) and the bin ladins. amazing how nobody thought to reveal that they were in negotiations for oil and in bed with all kinds of deals. the info war is on, and yes, the sheeple are waking. as TheDocumentaryZone stated. poetry hound is who i will be laughing at as i bury his disease infested body from the havoc that the elite are going to wreak on this country.
dyst3ri420 2 years ago
what makes it funny, is if all buildings collapsed under extreme heat, and bodies were dismantled, and broken everywhere, how did the paper passports survive the fire.Must of been extremem heat. and where are the wings and tail of the plane?do this experiment. take your 3 bucks go buy cheapest pan you can at dollar store.light it in the barbeque or fire pit, & keep burning it all night.let it burn 4 hours.I guarantee u will come back on here &tell me it did not even melt!def. not in 10 mins
kprofscrts 2 years ago
yeah.. american govenrment would neeevverr do anything to its people.
if you believe that you dont know the history of this country.
carlawon 2 years ago
You know, they are funny indeed.
kangtimelord 2 years ago
It's OBVIOUS the moon is made of green cheese. It's CLEAR the moon is made of green cheese. EVERYONE KNOWS the moon is made of green cheese.
911 kookspiracy clowns are funny.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
"PoetryHound", If you're getting paid to "debunk" the 9-11 truth movement, you should be advised that you are an accomplice to the 9-11 cover-up and will be tried for high treason when we finally take this country back, so keep the smart-ass comments coming, because you won't be able to hide behind allegations of "anti-semitism" when the sheeple become aware of who really did 9-11.
Don't forget that these sheeple are losing their jobs and their homes and will soon know that it's the Jews....
TheDocumentaryZone 2 years ago