@882here Because a tank is already like a sardine can, you have 4 People in there, and most of the vehicle is taken up by the Gun, and the Engine to support it, so you'd have to have about 2X the size. Most People at that point just have 2-4 Tanks in a column, firing in rapid succession. You'd have sighting issues. The distance between the guns the shell at different places down range. If you hit and kill it you still have 3/4 Left, while with your theory you'd have taken out 1/2
What good are these expensive toys? You got your asses handed to you by a group of people who don't have the capacity to build a single armored vehicle! The next war is going to be a home game fuckas'!
@Heaney5551 thats true, but we do need more snipers in Afghanistan. Over 600+ talibs were killed by Nato snipers. Imagine a dozen Nato sniper teams hiding in the mountains surrounding Taliban-controlled villages with UAV(drone) support. We wud b killin several dozen Talibs for atleast 2 days, weakenin & harassin them b4 launchin an assault with spec ops & ANA soldiers(we used these tactics wen we 1st invaded a-stan, wonder wat now?)!!
@Heaney5551 u obviously hav no idea bout a-stan either do u?! Ma uncle was in the french legion 6 years ago & THERE ARE such things as Taliban-controlled villages, jus the Taliban blend in easily wit the local population. I hope u also kno dat the Talibs treat Nato patrols as a chance to finally ambush nato soldiers which is quite problematic. Although mor Talibs r killed, still 2 british soldiers killed sends de hole nation cryin wich da talibs like 2 laf at & use as propaganda
The IRON WARRIORS video youtube.com/watch?v=E0LJX1Er6lE presents the Past as a Prologue to the future exploring the usefulness of military history while illustrating remarkable individuals, leadership skills and contributions made by the USA Army. The Iron Warriors highlights the fact that today’s soldier is required to function in many sectors and expertise levels in our global environment and thus their unique ability to transfer military skills into the private sector job market.
Does that stack behind the tank rout the exhaust upward to protect infantry from the heat? I know that was one of the problems with the Abrams turbine engine, the exhaust is very hot so its dangerous for infantry, but that can be fixed by just directing the exhaust away from infantry right?
They should have send Abramses way sooner. With tanks you need less air strikes which means less colateral damage. Tanks also mean less NATO casualties because they are designed to take hits and survvive.
Deploying tanks saves lives of both NATO personnel and civilians.
The Danish and Canadian Leopard 2's were also very effective.
Get rid of all those peacekeeping vehicles with little to no weapons and garbage like Stryiker which can't even fire on the more.
I know the Challenger 2 was in Iraq. Lots of footage and photos of that.
But as far as I know it was not send to Afghanistan and the most powerfull vehicle the British desployed was the Warrior. I did read the British Army did request Challengers but this was denied by the government.
But I could be wrong and it has recently been deployed there because the Danish and Canadian Leopard 2's left.
Got a link or pictures/video of the Challenger 2 in Afghanistan?
@NationalSniper Well I've never seen it but according to this British unit we met when we where at Kandahar they said they had just come out here but like i said i personally have got no evidence of it
@NationalSniper no challenger 2 tanks got deployed to afghan(saddly). The government said that it would give the wrong image to the afghan people and that we didnt need them, which i find is a load of bollox really.
I totally agree. The fear of giving wrong image is more important to politicians then the safety of their troops. :(
But they also send jet fighters which give same image as MBT. With tanks you need less air strikes so less colateral damage. You can actually defeat the enemy with MBTs.
IDF experience shows using heavy armor is more effective and cheaper then airstrikes.
3000 airstrikes can't get rid of Kadaffi. Send in MBTs and its over for him and his army.
@NationalSniper Different terrain though. There is only so much a tank can do in that fucking shithole country. I spent 18 months total clibing up and down mountains , id hate to have to get a tank in there.
@DisgorgeNUKEusa how about..... you figure out what you want to say, then you say it so we all can understand. then we can knock your teeth out when we figure out your insulting us. capiche?
oh and if you call anyone an Ameri cunt again, i will fly to your rice paddie and burn down your village, and then personally remind you who leveled 2 of your cities 70 years ago. :D
@RSR47RUS то не доказывает что-нибыдь. оно было сделан перед, война в персидском заливе и ветераны войны Ирака имеют рассказы о ей. также мое строение помогли отцом, котор M1A2 Abrams (огорченное для плохого русского)
@RSR47RUS Ну, если вы когда-нибудь наблюдать некоторые кадры из головы камеры на морских пехотинцев Theres обычно бак вспашки через окопы и подобное дерьмо.
@8324922061 I have a question. Some guy was telling me about a defense system we use for our tanks. What is it called? Something dragon. I cant find any info on it and I know this guy was legit. I figure someone on the inside should know. I dont think its classified because I found a video on youtube about it a year ago but now I cant find, any info? I can explain how the system works if you dont know what Im talking about.
@amaraklov thanks for the reply. The system I am referring to is actually still a classified system called Dragon Dart, way beyond trophy. In essence it reflects all enemy fire right back to them.
against peasants real fair! No wonder IEDS are the way to go for them
skipsassy1 1 week ago
This was my 1st MOS choice till I failed the color test when it came to my eyes
USMC465 3 weeks ago
@882here Because a tank is already like a sardine can, you have 4 People in there, and most of the vehicle is taken up by the Gun, and the Engine to support it, so you'd have to have about 2X the size. Most People at that point just have 2-4 Tanks in a column, firing in rapid succession. You'd have sighting issues. The distance between the guns the shell at different places down range. If you hit and kill it you still have 3/4 Left, while with your theory you'd have taken out 1/2
amaraklov 3 weeks ago
@blitzvodka WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???!
8324922061 1 month ago
@882here Not enough room inside the tank to have 2 guns
HuntingWales 1 month ago
@882here theres no space to place it...and it would be to heavy
vladvlad24 2 months ago
What good are these expensive toys? You got your asses handed to you by a group of people who don't have the capacity to build a single armored vehicle! The next war is going to be a home game fuckas'!
browneyes4 2 months ago
God Bless Our Troops!
May they get out of that hell-hole and back home as soon as possible!
I believe that 911 was an inside job that was foised on the American people to kick-start the war in Afghanistan & war in Iraq for the "NWO".
BoudiccaBlanc 2 months ago
lol i like the monster logo when they were bore sighting
bondman2004tippy 2 months ago
Relax hunny. You are not going to personally do anything. Americunt.
stahlwerke 3 months ago
The beginning of this video scared me. I was all like "Fuck, don't make me put the track back on." =P Good times...
KonstantineMortis13 3 months ago
why do you need M1A1 ? All what you need is a M82 A for those Talibs !!!!!!!
PolysiusHanoi 4 months ago
@PolysiusHanoi
You know nothing about military tactics if you think that an anti-material rifle is going to take out an entire insurgency.
Heaney5551 3 months ago
@Heaney5551 thats true, but we do need more snipers in Afghanistan. Over 600+ talibs were killed by Nato snipers. Imagine a dozen Nato sniper teams hiding in the mountains surrounding Taliban-controlled villages with UAV(drone) support. We wud b killin several dozen Talibs for atleast 2 days, weakenin & harassin them b4 launchin an assault with spec ops & ANA soldiers(we used these tactics wen we 1st invaded a-stan, wonder wat now?)!!
147saad 2 months ago
@147saad
You just don't understand ANYTHING about military tactics at all do you.
You don't just have "Taliban controlled" villages, because you don't have a clue where the Taliban are.
You have REGIONS that you know the Taliban are in, but you have to patrol and search.
When they appear, there's no possible way you can have snipers ready.
Heaney5551 2 months ago
@Heaney5551 u obviously hav no idea bout a-stan either do u?! Ma uncle was in the french legion 6 years ago & THERE ARE such things as Taliban-controlled villages, jus the Taliban blend in easily wit the local population. I hope u also kno dat the Talibs treat Nato patrols as a chance to finally ambush nato soldiers which is quite problematic. Although mor Talibs r killed, still 2 british soldiers killed sends de hole nation cryin wich da talibs like 2 laf at & use as propaganda
147saad 2 months ago
The IRON WARRIORS video youtube.com/watch?v=E0LJX1Er6lE presents the Past as a Prologue to the future exploring the usefulness of military history while illustrating remarkable individuals, leadership skills and contributions made by the USA Army. The Iron Warriors highlights the fact that today’s soldier is required to function in many sectors and expertise levels in our global environment and thus their unique ability to transfer military skills into the private sector job market.
RDIGlobal 4 months ago
A strange collection of antennas they have
MucusFelidae 4 months ago
im gettin a bald eagled boner
fergie123able 5 months ago
Does that stack behind the tank rout the exhaust upward to protect infantry from the heat? I know that was one of the problems with the Abrams turbine engine, the exhaust is very hot so its dangerous for infantry, but that can be fixed by just directing the exhaust away from infantry right?
mgibbs88 5 months ago
we should have sent a pair of these instead of seal team six, less risk more boom
LordoftheMojave 5 months ago
Super ! finally USA has sent M1 Abrams in Afghanistan !
Semper Fi !!!!
MrArmyStrong74 6 months ago
@MrArmyStrong74 Were have you been for the last 2 years?
RaptorDiablo 4 months ago
ive got a spud cannon that can shot further then that
leftylethborg 6 months ago
I want to be tank crewman when I join :S
xCh34pShOtx 6 months ago
Comment removed
claydough210 7 months ago
What was that black thing in the cannon of one of the tanks that the soldiers were looking at?
Chibling 7 months ago
@Chibling It's a bore sight. Used to zero the system.
sgtwilliams123 6 months ago
@sgtwilliams123 Thank you sir.
Chibling 6 months ago
god help u
we are all afghan people with u
persian260 8 months ago
They should have send Abramses way sooner. With tanks you need less air strikes which means less colateral damage. Tanks also mean less NATO casualties because they are designed to take hits and survvive.
Deploying tanks saves lives of both NATO personnel and civilians.
The Danish and Canadian Leopard 2's were also very effective.
Get rid of all those peacekeeping vehicles with little to no weapons and garbage like Stryiker which can't even fire on the more.
NationalSniper 8 months ago 2
@NationalSniper Don't forget the challenger 2
stratagie1 8 months ago
@stratagie1
Has it been deployed to Afghanistan?
NationalSniper 8 months ago
@NationalSniper Yes it has and iraq
stratagie1 8 months ago
@stratagie1
I know the Challenger 2 was in Iraq. Lots of footage and photos of that.
But as far as I know it was not send to Afghanistan and the most powerfull vehicle the British desployed was the Warrior. I did read the British Army did request Challengers but this was denied by the government.
But I could be wrong and it has recently been deployed there because the Danish and Canadian Leopard 2's left.
Got a link or pictures/video of the Challenger 2 in Afghanistan?
NationalSniper 8 months ago
@NationalSniper Well I've never seen it but according to this British unit we met when we where at Kandahar they said they had just come out here but like i said i personally have got no evidence of it
stratagie1 8 months ago
@NationalSniper no challenger 2 tanks got deployed to afghan(saddly). The government said that it would give the wrong image to the afghan people and that we didnt need them, which i find is a load of bollox really.
airsoftDuggan 8 months ago
@airsoftDuggan
I totally agree. The fear of giving wrong image is more important to politicians then the safety of their troops. :(
But they also send jet fighters which give same image as MBT. With tanks you need less air strikes so less colateral damage. You can actually defeat the enemy with MBTs.
IDF experience shows using heavy armor is more effective and cheaper then airstrikes.
3000 airstrikes can't get rid of Kadaffi. Send in MBTs and its over for him and his army.
NationalSniper 7 months ago
@NationalSniper Russia would not allow that....
Chibling 7 months ago
@NationalSniper Different terrain though. There is only so much a tank can do in that fucking shithole country. I spent 18 months total clibing up and down mountains , id hate to have to get a tank in there.
Antifaith29 5 months ago
@DisgorgeNUKEusa how about..... you figure out what you want to say, then you say it so we all can understand. then we can knock your teeth out when we figure out your insulting us. capiche?
oh and if you call anyone an Ameri cunt again, i will fly to your rice paddie and burn down your village, and then personally remind you who leveled 2 of your cities 70 years ago. :D
KEEPERBEAST 8 months ago 28
@KEEPERBEAST Oorah
billyjackphillips132 7 months ago
@KEEPERBEAST americunt :P
st0rm32 6 months ago
Comment removed
KEEPERBEAST 8 months ago
Ни разу не видел записи, где абрамс стреляет на ходу...
RSR47RUS 8 months ago
@RSR47RUS то не доказывает что-нибыдь. оно было сделан перед, война в персидском заливе и ветераны войны Ирака имеют рассказы о ей. также мое строение помогли отцом, котор M1A2 Abrams (огорченное для плохого русского)
asianiinvasion 8 months ago
@RSR47RUS Ну, если вы когда-нибудь наблюдать некоторые кадры из головы камеры на морских пехотинцев Theres обычно бак вспашки через окопы и подобное дерьмо.
ORBITALLAZER 7 months ago
@DisgorgeNUKEusa dont make me fly to ur country and kick ur ass
8324922061 9 months ago 35
@8324922061 TOO FUNNY!
TheBigDead0ne 5 months ago
@8324922061 Name 1 country you kicked ass in.
stahlwerke 3 months ago
@stahlwerke im not gonna use the term "kick ass" loL but i have i seen my share of combat, i was based in korengal valley in afghanistan, wbu?
8324922061 3 months ago
@8324922061 I have a question. Some guy was telling me about a defense system we use for our tanks. What is it called? Something dragon. I cant find any info on it and I know this guy was legit. I figure someone on the inside should know. I dont think its classified because I found a video on youtube about it a year ago but now I cant find, any info? I can explain how the system works if you dont know what Im talking about.
G1formation 2 months ago
@G1formation If you look for an Israeli Tank Defense System you'll find it it's called Trophy
amaraklov 3 weeks ago
@amaraklov thanks for the reply. The system I am referring to is actually still a classified system called Dragon Dart, way beyond trophy. In essence it reflects all enemy fire right back to them.
G1formation 3 weeks ago
@DisgorgeNUKEusa It's amazing how we give you so many choices and you fuck off with them. you're horrible, just stop posting.
EDbringer 9 months ago
@DisgorgeNUKEusa fuck you! XD
8324922061 9 months ago
@DisgorgeNUKEusa fuck you
8324922061 9 months ago
это красная армия, на них красные флаги =)
absent79 10 months ago
@absent79 Его красные бело-голубых вы просто можете видеть это очень хорошо мой дядя танкист в 38-й отдел брони в афганской
ORBITALLAZER 7 months ago
@ORBITALLAZER red alert )))
absent79 5 months ago
number 1 tank........ well the leopard iz 1st o well fuck the leopard
xDARKSTARRRx 10 months ago
Dang,...everytime those tanks fire...all you see is a whole buncha smoke and junk lol
harry123679 11 months ago
@harry123679 LOL I don't even know why I found that comment so funny!
TheMrwouldyourather 10 months ago
I don't know why,but I love weapons
lyannamikey123 11 months ago
just like in battlefield bad company 2 =D
MS57KB 1 year ago
i wouldnt want to look down that barrel, you guys are brave.
jgtheman84 1 year ago
@jgtheman84 You don't have to look down that barrel and neither do those guys. So weird comment.
stahlwerke 11 months ago
@stahlwerke maybe not look directly down it but their faces are still at the end of it.
jgtheman84 11 months ago
@jgtheman84 it still has the same basic rule of old style "Cannons" :3 you have to make sure there isnt any thing in there :3
masterspector 11 months ago
awesome tanks fellas.
jgtheman84 1 year ago