england930: cause population of germany 80 million but england is 50 million.this is first reason.then germany produce leopard ,and it is first powerful tank in the world.then aircraft technologies.but england is powerful at the same time cause england has nuclear bomb.but in my opinion germany powerful than uk,not just uk also all european countries.
lol, if china ever decided, to go to war, they would have over 750,00,000 soldiers. god, I love the average usa citizen, but their gun freaks are outrageous.
@Dogru93 How is germany better than UK we have a way better military Our military spending is 3rd highest in the world germanys is 8th. You dont even have an aircraft carrier.
Russia is again superpower.Russia has a lot of tanks,helicopters,and etc.Russia takes first place then China,then America.I am not from Russia but I know Russian power,
@uploader , China 's budget more than Russia's doesn't prove that its better than Russia , prove that china's weaponry is better than Russia (not to mention they rely heavily on Russian aircrafts), how can you say that Chinese army is more well trained than Russian , Russian geography is in such a way that they don't require much naval power, when we talk about nukes we don't mean negation thingy..it means destruction and China will suffer more of it ..
@MrKasperabhay China's military is not even close to Russians military like my father meet spetnaz soldiers they play dirty and pretty tough soldiers even there normal soldiers cant compare there training more intense. If Russian had the money china would be more into trouble. I agree with you with power sometimes a lot nations abuse it.
@DragonWhisper88 yeah dude ..even USSR wasn't so aggressive when it was communist ..china makes unilateral decision..It does not hesitate to reverse engg. and copy technology ..even Russian officials say that china copies tech at an alarming rate - advanced missile defense system in only 5 years all Chinese main fighter crafts are merely copy of Russian crafts. their over aggressiveness gonna take them down...
um... im pretty sure that japan doesnt have its own standing army i thought that it was that they were controlled by the UK and the US after WWII just like germany
this list is stupid because you have india isreal china who have small if not no amont nuclear wepons ahead of the U.K who has more than them 3 combined
Haha remember when Russia and the US owned Japan? I'm pretty sure if there was a WW3, Russia and US would be going against North Korea and China. BTW Russia isn't even communist anymore. WTF is Israel doing on the top 10¿
If World War III does break out. It will determine who will really control this God damn forsaken planet. It doesn't matter how strong someone really is when it comes down to it. It's the last one that stands that really matters. Everyones strong in there own ways. We all should approve our government to go to war. Just so idiots would stop bitching about WHOs powerful.
you don't have the idea how strong u.s military is, don't look at iraq and afghan war. that's not a real war. usa is capable of burning down china (if without hesitation about the chinese civilian),
@LaughingGor888 China? They wouldn't be alive if USA didn't give them the supplys to live. :c. USA does have the great military power, and most allys so we would have allot more power.
@UCEMARBLEZ Either you're smarter than me and what you said to me doesn't quite get processed exactly or I don't know what your logic is. And I'm impressed at how you didn't "really" go to school, and you don't sound well stupid.
You bite the hand which feed you before ,Chineses !
America kicked butts Japan in 1945 , that's the way America help you get out of Japan 's domination .
America help you before 1940 , without America , 6 Europe countries torn down China to 6 pieces ...Now , you want to fight with uncle Sam ... Are you human or animal , China-men ?
@jamnin94 , Chineses wanted to make war with uncle Sam ,when they become a loser , the winner don't need to pay back anything for the loser .....That's natural laws !
no...because india can be powerful nation in world. but our fking politicians sucking our bloods .... out side india they deposited as black money million crore....funds...in swizz bank..but still most indians dont hav food.
I'm a Russian , and the Russia are third powerful country in the world i am so happy to hear that and our friend China now are second powerful , go China and Russia to against America , US suck
@xieyihui33 your country is 2 powerful country in the world and america has nato and nato has 3,000,000 troops combine and russia and china combine is 3,000,000 soldiers so it would be a horrible war most of the world is allies with america
Also Russia have to be in first place because couple years ago maybe in 90's or 80's Russian specnaz GRU kicked American soldiers asses in middle east or elsewhere and captured helicopter supercobra. i know all that because american soldier who survived told about that
@Jungerooo russia fell behand in military america won the space race and america has star wars not the movie a space missile defence im sorry your country lost the cold war
@usman92ful nobody compares tejas with su-30mki... Tejas is an interceptor... Su-30mki is an air superiority fighter... The job of tejas is to intercept the enemy aircraft... not to go on an attack mission!!!
China thinks they can scare the world... not while America Israel, Britain.. India, France, Germany, South korea, Taiwan, Canada, Japan, Australia, Italy, Scandanavia, Turkey, exist.. suckers.. Russia,China, North Korea only threat to democracy.. Iran would be crushed in a few days by nuclear warheads coming from everywhere.. Democracy rules..
long live NATO: Albania,Belgium,Bulgaria,Canada,Croatia,Czech Republic,Denmark,Estonia,France,Germany,Greece(yes, not allies with stupid russia),Hungary,Iceland,Italy,Latvia,Lithuania,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Poland,Portugal,Romania,Slovakia,Slovenia,Spain,Turkey,UK, and USA
Russia has geographical advantage ..(extreme Siberian cold climate will favor them as they have defeated other armies over there and have a lot of war experience ) ; similarly China has high- altitude advantage over India (Himalayan range border)..and remember Tech alone won't win you a war ..there are other factors that decides victory and losses..
@kunbob100 hahaha india thay have a 2 rate military lack loads of equipment thay dont have gear to invade a country by air or land there only good against neighboring countrys
Considering a heavy ,med and light transport aircraft can carry ATLEAST 80,40,20 troops resp. the calculated troops comes to 9680.
Plus including the ambhibious ships the calculated troops comes to 5000.
Total 14680.
I didn even calculate 150 transport helicopters.
If ur overpatriotism wont let u accept that your equipements are inferior, just know India has 5 times the troops,10 times the tank,3 times the combat jets than Uk...Simple!
@rohitb3 lol looks like you dont no nout transport helis hahahaa wot there gona fly 1000s of miles
and a forces of around 14.000 is nout against a well trained military plus thay only have 36 jets protecting all them and india have over 1 million men wot a waste if thay cant use them
@rohitb3 size mean fuck all we have 10 times more attack helicopters and 100 times better
britian as the best trained military in the world 80.000 men in navy alone and then probley about 100.000 merchant navy and airforce about 10.000 and india airforce is only about 3.000
and india have 178 good combat jets britian have 207 nealy half of india combat jets are mig 21 ahaha
ye india may have 4 times more men but thay cant use them
And yes, about the tanks....Jalshwa carry Atleast 30(Not sure,should be more) and Shardul/ MAgar can carry 10 each...Total 90 tanks and 24 II76 carrying another 24 T-90s
Total 104 tanks.
So if India wants to go on an all out rampage here are the nos which can be transprted at one go, ATLEAST 14680 troops and 104 tanks. and always come back for another load....
@rohitb3 ....Jalshwa 12 tanks Shardul 10 Magar class 15 thats 70 and II76 cant carry anything over 40 tonnes so no tansk
and do you no how long it takes to travel by sea it took britian over 3 weeks to the falklands and thats nout against a well trained military india only have 36 rubbish jets thats why britian is gettign 140 f-35 stealth fighters on there 2 new supper carriers
britian even took over 40.000 men to the falklands and there only small islands britian can take over 200.000
@rohitb3 lol it dont matter how big a ship is lol and its not 3 times bigger its only 8.000 tonnes overs are around 5.000 tonnes its like the Albion class each ship can carry 6 MBT and thats 20.000 tonnes but the ship is not just for carrying tanks its for over things its like the bay class with is less that can carry 24 MBT and thats arounf 16.000 tonnes
and the tornados are not old in 2003 thay all had a full refit all the tec is new its just the airframe there the best bombing jets ever
Both Bay class and Jalashwa is 16000 tons FULL LOAD, so im guessin Jalashwa can carry similar no. of tanks.
And dont u feel weird...?.U Brits claim Ef is the best jet,Tornedo is the best bomber,Challenger 2 best tank,Type 45 best ship,etc,etc...dont u feel that's jus ridiculous? Makers of Hal Tejas say it's the Best jet in it's class, but we are smart enough to know those are marketing tactics. Upgraded Torndeos are old like Upgraded Mig-27/Jaguar/Mig 21
@rohitb3 you dont have a clue do you just because its the same tonnage dont mean it can carry the same ablion class is bigger than bay class but bay class can carry 4 times more tanks
and i claim because its true EF best jet of its kind f-22 is better but different kind of jets CH2 best tank been battle proven tornado is the best bombing jets its very good and flying under radar and low level flying and type 45 is the most advanced warship astute class most advanced sub
@rohitb3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> and no britian took 40.000 men at once the war only lasted about 42 days it took britian over 3 week get there thats over 21 days
and india dont even no if thay will be able build there own 5th gen fighter it took them 20 years to build there own tank india is not good at building things all there good for is cheap labour
India had it's flag on the moon with it's own spacecraft, 4th nation to do so...
5th gen fighters....not a big deal.....
You didn calculate the 4+ gen Mig-29s and 4th gen Mirage 2000...?...Funny..lol
Mig-29SMT is probably one of the most advanced Air Superiority fighter today (Total 304 modern jets)
Well, in 1971 war India made pak surrender in 13 dAys..... Training...?? anyways now Training facilities are even better..and the view of that analyst Maroof Raza cant b ignored
@rohitb3 mig 29 are not 4+ gen ahhahaha mig 29 is not even in top 20 modern jet fighters its shit like i said f-15 f-16 have shot them down plus india pilots are not that good
the only reason india won in 1971 was because east pakistan was on indias side pakistan had to travel 1000 miles across india to fight if india tryed to invade pakistan thay would of not won like all the over wars
Indian pilots are one of the BEST ....I wouldn say the only bEST coz i respect pilots of other Afs as well.
Red Flag Director "This is one of the finest airforce which has ever visited Red Flag"
And i came through an article , which said that during an Indo-Uk Join AF ex. , Uk used all it's Best and most experience pilots and IAF used it's intermediate/youung pilots.
So pls dont comment shit about Indian pilots or of any AF pilot, jsut shows ur knowledge.
@rohitb3 Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 pakistan lost 19 aircraft india lost over 100
falklands war argentina lost just under 100 aircraft britian RAF lost none
and dont belive everything you read britian wouldnt send there best pilots all british pilots are best as thay can be trained and thay usually send beginer pilots so thay can learn stuff wots the piont in sending pilots who aready no wot there doing so thats how i no your chatting shit
@rohitb3 well if thay was flying in 1965 thay would be atleast 67 and i no pilots and you need be very fit so i dont think thay would be good pilots at that ang because you need very quick reactions
and if you still follow the same training programme i think you need some help up dateing it then you no how much jets have changed since then and tec on the aircraft and the new missiles wot you need to no how to defeat
Every Department......Su-30mki is Bigger, hence carries more and better variety of weapons, more range (Ef-2900km,Su-3000km) , More speed(Ef-Mach 2,Su-Mach 2.35) , Thrust Vectoring...so its "Super maneuvarable". Ef i wud say is more agile, cz it's smaller..and has supercruise
EF uses a Pulse Dopler radar similar to our Hal Tejas, AESA radars will be equipped soon. So we also hv a better radar with adavanced radar jamming features and engagin features..
@rohitb3 dont no were yo get your info form standerd EF 3000km with the new EJ2000 engines is plus 30% so thats 3900km EF wins in Service ceiling Rate of climb Thrust/weight: Speed EF can also hold high G's for longer hahaha just seen this never new this for every 3.75 hours the SU-30mki spends in the sky it need 1 hour being fixed EF is 48.5 hours lol and AESA cant be fitted to the su-30 because the nose is to small SU-30mki mach 1.9 1317mph EF mach 2.2 EF 1674mph
Ef's range is 2900km, if u say otherwise, tell me where can i look it up?
EJ2000 engine is so weak, we declined it's offer to be used in the Hal Tejas.
AESA radars are almost ready for the Su-30mki(Super Sukhois)
And dont believe that Mach 1.9 speed for the Su-30mki. Look up IAF's official site (Mach 2.35) All sukhois have a min speed of mach 2.25, inlcudin the su-27.
@rohitb3 my mate called ryan naylor is a eurofighter pilot
and ok su-30mki can get the AESA radar i fort the nose was to small but i was wrong
u can find anywhere were it seys su-30mki top speed mach 2.35 i seen a su-30MKM with a top speed of 2.25
but still these thing dont mean much in battle its the tec onboard and its stealth like EF is 20 times smaller on radar very big advantage EF radar alot better EF missile system
and also EF as look and lock and its all voice controll
Voice control will help in quicker reaction, but anyways...are u aware the Su-30mki is a twin seater....one controllin the jet and the other the missiles. U can guess how much will this enhance the performance in the air. Specialisation!
Anyways, honestly speaking Ef seems more like our Hal Tejas, a bigger and slightly more advanced variant of it.
Both have same Pulse dopler radars, very Low Rcs, Delta wings, similar maneuvarability and agility,etc.
@rohitb3 just because there are to crew dont mean its better it just means thay couldnt get one person to do the job thats wot i mean EF as loads of tec to help there pilots thay only need one crew the only EF fighters with 2 crew are for training
it is said a 5 year old kid could fly a eurofighter because its so easy
and thay dont have same RCS lol su-30mki is 20 times bigger on radar
oh...so u wanna say that we modified the basic model of the Su-30 for timepass?....com on dude...dont sounds desperate...., 2 pilots add a 2nd dimension increasing the performance by SEVERAL Folds....like a two seater car,one guy on the steering wheel another with a gun from the window.
And those similarities i was comparing Ef with Hal Tejas,both hv low RCS,similar agility,maneuverability,same kinda radars,etc
@rohitb3 hahahaha dont compare a 2 seater jet with a car with a gun hahaha have you even seen inside of a jet a 2 seater jet and a single do the same job just as good its even said single seaters are better
and dont compare Hal Tejas wit a EF thats just stupid
Well, the car eg., that's how i explain a kid....in other more professonal words, Adding another seat is not as simple as that as it requires added elements and improved structural stiffness. A 2nd seat on a trainer and a 2nd seat on a combat aircraft does a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT job, We have improved and modified the MKI from the orignal single seater Su-30. Same goes for the FGFA from the orignial Pak Fa.
@rohitb3 wot hahhahah EF as better radar same range better weapons plus the new EF are getting thrust vectroing PESA radar is old
and it dont mean nout if that have 2 crew apart from thay need training proper thats the reason thay have 2 crew so if one makes a mistake i as my mate that who is a EF pilot
@rohitb3 it dont matter if a air to air missile as 400km the su-30mki radar range is 200km but it would only able see a EF on radar at about 20miles max more like 10 miles but with its advanced jamming aswell you probley wouldnt able get a lock anyway before its 2 late
and yes i no abit about radars
and so wot if the PESA can track 15 the radar is rubbish for jets because of the loud engines
and EF is getting thrust vectoring
but a Ef would shoot any jet down before it new it
@wiganerrmc a low rcs might work againt average radars, not against a powerful PESA radar. Anyways in short IAF vs RAF U have 160 EF(4.5th gen) and 136 Tornedos(4th gen,considering upgrades) WE have 180 Su-30mki(4.5th gen) watch?v=gAlpgOG6z6I 7 Hal Tejas(4+ gen) watch?v=4hvoZ0wfQ6Q 68 Mig 29SMT(4+gen) watch?v=TKC6Wh_g2ds 51 Mirage 2000 (4th gen) 150 Mig,about 270 total Jaguars and Mig-27(3.5th gen) Watch those vids to learn more about the uniqueness of each aircraft.
no offence, ur kinda overpatriotic or thick....keep reading the previous comments till u digest that Su-30mki is superior in every aspect except RCS,Supercruise.
RAF is designed to take on Iraq or Afghanistan
IAF is designed to take on China
Only if u combine Uk/French airforce together with EF,Rafale,Mirage 2000 and Tornedo, only then u can somewhat match the IAF..
This is my last comment, if u hv any more question keep reading the previous comments,u'll get the ans.
@rohitb3 brits are fucking dumasses who lost all wars, the only thing they won by themselves recently was worl war 2, and we had to bail them out (they were losing until we joined) u r russian jet might beat the eurotrash dubstep but our f 35 fucks your sukhoi in everything. u say thrust vectoring/ say VTOL
@rohitb3 ye transport aircraft can go 6000km some can even get air re fule but helis cant go 6000km
india is missing laods in there navy thay even said thay need bigger amphibious assault vessels
and we dont just have more LCU royal navy is 4 times bigger in tonnage we have larger and better ships
britian could invade india very easy the 3 navys can take easy over 200.000 men even more just in 1 of the larger MN ships can carry 5.000 men and these over 500 ships in the MN
@rohitb3 hahah that video a stupid russia girl made it shes about sey su-30 is better even tho its far from a EF even won a f-22
mirage 2000 ok mig 29 shit loads of f-16 have shot down migs and 2 EF won 8 f-16 so mig 29 wouldnt stand a chance mig 21 i wouldnt even use them for training in never mind combat jaguar shit thats why british got rid of them and yes 200k men and 500 tanks could easy take on 1.2 million men 500
ww2 30.000 british troops took on over 1 million italy and won
@rohitb3 arjun is not better than challenger 2 hahah CH2 is the best tank in the world and its battle proven unlike urjun
and india dont have better frigaes lol there frigates thay use are guided missile frigate british guided missile warship is the type 45 the worlds most advanced warship
the type 23 is the best anti sub frigatein the world and were even getting new 1s
and eurofighter is getting trust vectoring today it is the best jet of its kind and 2nd best combat jet after f-22
@rohitb3 yes when nato invaded iraq about 400 challenger 1 and abrams took out around 5500 iraqi tanks with no losses
and just because a missile range is 400km dont mean you can shoot a jet down at 400km fuck me you no fuck all its not even worth takeing to you the su-30mki radar as a 200km tracking range
su-30mki RCS is 20m2
EF is only 1m2 so on radar you would able see a su-30mki 20 times farer on radar you would only able see a EF from about 20 miles tops its size of a swan on radar
@rohitb3 and wot is the point in haveing a missile wot range is 200km the farest ever air to air kill with a jet is probley about 10 miles
the eurofighter uses a new gen of aircraft radar called euroradar CAPTOR and EF also uses the passive infra red airborne tracking equipment called PIRATE and it also as a look and lock helmet wot the pilot wears plus everthing in the EF is voice controled
and why do you think pakistan is sucking up to china now because nato fucked them off
@rohitb3 yes EF can also track 15 and engages 4 targets at once EF radar alot better and can also do steath tracking
plus EF radar is AESA su-30mki is PESA
old passive electronically scanned radars spread their broadcasts out across a band of frequencies, which makes it very difficult to detect over background noise. AESAs allow ships and aircraft to broadcast powerful radar signals while still remaining stealthy
@rohitb3 its sad we have never considerd india a major power
Britain has the third largest declared defence budget in the world, after the US and China at $74 Billion in 2010. It is one of only five recognised nuclear powers, with no more than 240 active Nuclear weapons and is deemed to have the second highest power projection capability in the world, behind the United States
Now that i think about it, China is on its way to the top pretty fast. How fast they have been modernizing is outstanding. They are currently holding the worlds biggest navy (# of ships) and its (gross) economy is only helping them even more. They also have a great UAV program going on that is pretty much the best in the world. Russia should be worried unlike the US. We have the Atlantic and out outstanding navil power. Russia is only a short drive away. Oh, and where the hell is Turkey!?!?!?!?
@smaltalkfan Dude!!!! 600,000,000 soldiers that are way over there in Asia. Try to get them even close to the US. Will Never happen. Plus the US has bigger guns. In battle and in our pants. lol Poor asians.
I can see how Israel is up there. The US sends them all the money in the world. And China. Im sorry but its not going to be a superpower.... They have a lot of people. Well thats great. Try to get all those people over on to US soil. Thats just going to be a lot of target practice for our Navy and Air Force. It should be American, Russia.... Then who cares about the other ones because they dont even come close. lol
@MrCMN94 china is on the way of takeing over US even US have said there scared of the progress there makeing in military thay have built the best jet in the world j-20 thay are building like a new warship every month thay are building 2 5th gen fighters thay also spend 350 billion on defence about which in turms of spending is more than US ye US spend about 600 billion but thay get overpriced and ripped off
its like china j-10 the programe only cost 78 million now like US f-22 cost 80 billion
@wiganerrmc dumb ass here are our allies NATO: Albania,Belgium,Bulgaria,Canada,Croatia,Czech Republic,Denmark,Estonia,France,Germany,Greece(yes, not allies with stupid russia),Hungary,Iceland,Italy,Latvia,Lithuania,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Poland,Portugal,Romania,Slovakia,Slovenia,Spain,Turkey,UK, and USA
i realy dont think china wants to fuck with us, plus china has shitty technology, really they are strength in numbers, and china doesnt ahve as much allies as us
@smellmyclock If you think China has a 3rd grade military such as the Libya has/had, then you're seriously underestimating the Chinese military. US defence computer networks are one of the most fragile in the world, let alone those from NATO countries and China can easily hack into those systems and render US-NATO forces half-blind. But a war between NATO and China is a NATO-fanboy's wet dream anyway.
rofl.... no.4 and no.3 duude u cant put Israel and Russia near side to side omg...... No logic dudee How some1 can bee ratarded sooo much ... Israel 4Milions population Russia 150Milions and much more high tech weapons.... pointlesss.. Russia can do rampage on Israel an crush tham in ONLY ONE Wave..........
lol thats not true
SuperKhiam 2 weeks ago
türkiye?????????
aliatack19 1 month ago
england930: cause population of germany 80 million but england is 50 million.this is first reason.then germany produce leopard ,and it is first powerful tank in the world.then aircraft technologies.but england is powerful at the same time cause england has nuclear bomb.but in my opinion germany powerful than uk,not just uk also all european countries.
Dogru93 1 month ago
germany my ASS
NAVITASHAMEENA 1 month ago
1. USA 2. RUSSIA 3. CHINA 4. UK 5. FRANCE 6. ISRAEL 7. GERMANY 8. ITALY 9.INDIA 10. TURKEY
TheBeloved123 1 month ago
Quality better than quantity usa and israel
TheCrazykevin09 2 months ago
lol, if china ever decided, to go to war, they would have over 750,00,000 soldiers. god, I love the average usa citizen, but their gun freaks are outrageous.
ALPHADOG3 2 months ago
GLOBALFIREPOWER com
Killaxxx43 2 months ago
GLOBALFIRE com THE REAL military power in the WORLD...
Killaxxx43 2 months ago
And this ranking is false because this shows that,Germany takes 8 place.But Germany takes 5 or 6 place.France and England don't powerful than Germany
Dogru93 2 months ago
@Dogru93 How is germany better than UK we have a way better military Our military spending is 3rd highest in the world germanys is 8th. You dont even have an aircraft carrier.
england930 1 month ago
Russia is again superpower.Russia has a lot of tanks,helicopters,and etc.Russia takes first place then China,then America.I am not from Russia but I know Russian power,
Dogru93 2 months ago
u know thats wrong
DarkJok3r34 2 months ago
@uploader , China 's budget more than Russia's doesn't prove that its better than Russia , prove that china's weaponry is better than Russia (not to mention they rely heavily on Russian aircrafts), how can you say that Chinese army is more well trained than Russian , Russian geography is in such a way that they don't require much naval power, when we talk about nukes we don't mean negation thingy..it means destruction and China will suffer more of it ..
MrKasperabhay 3 months ago
@MrKasperabhay China's military is not even close to Russians military like my father meet spetnaz soldiers they play dirty and pretty tough soldiers even there normal soldiers cant compare there training more intense. If Russian had the money china would be more into trouble. I agree with you with power sometimes a lot nations abuse it.
DragonWhisper88 2 months ago
@DragonWhisper88 yeah dude ..even USSR wasn't so aggressive when it was communist ..china makes unilateral decision..It does not hesitate to reverse engg. and copy technology ..even Russian officials say that china copies tech at an alarming rate - advanced missile defense system in only 5 years all Chinese main fighter crafts are merely copy of Russian crafts. their over aggressiveness gonna take them down...
MrKasperabhay 2 months ago
also at 1:00 those are french not german look at the tail insignias
Duherro1 3 months ago
um... im pretty sure that japan doesnt have its own standing army i thought that it was that they were controlled by the UK and the US after WWII just like germany
Duherro1 3 months ago
N1 IS RUSSIA!!!
vladimirakosful 3 months ago
this list is stupid because you have india isreal china who have small if not no amont nuclear wepons ahead of the U.K who has more than them 3 combined
jessejones14 3 months ago
@jessejones14 that is why london got fucked by germany during WWII
HisHighnessKing 3 months ago
How come israel & india got into the list.
blackcobran 3 months ago
TÜRKİYE!!!ADAMI GÖTÜNDEN SİKER.
uur1987 3 months ago
all Turks are born soldiers
silverinci 3 months ago
Haha remember when Russia and the US owned Japan? I'm pretty sure if there was a WW3, Russia and US would be going against North Korea and China. BTW Russia isn't even communist anymore. WTF is Israel doing on the top 10¿
B1OOD4NDBULL3TS 3 months ago
lol you used pictures of the USA's military for the UK
DBTFxC 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If World War III does break out. It will determine who will really control this God damn forsaken planet. It doesn't matter how strong someone really is when it comes down to it. It's the last one that stands that really matters. Everyones strong in there own ways. We all should approve our government to go to war. Just so idiots would stop bitching about WHOs powerful.
MrPaoxiong 3 months ago
Not correct !
Starelwasel 3 months ago
1:29 its swedish aircrafts look at the emblem with three crowns with a circle
wakaflockadub 3 months ago
you don't have the idea how strong u.s military is, don't look at iraq and afghan war. that's not a real war. usa is capable of burning down china (if without hesitation about the chinese civilian),
ronanfran 3 months ago
@ronanfran Who are you complaining at?
jacob1233546 3 months ago
in this list india have to be 1st place
udayakumarudaya4 3 months ago
Turkey??
Utku2449 3 months ago
name of this song???
ghostpro007 3 months ago
Let's face it! China has the greatest military power!
LaughingGor888 3 months ago
@LaughingGor888 China? They wouldn't be alive if USA didn't give them the supplys to live. :c. USA does have the great military power, and most allys so we would have allot more power.
UCEMARBLEZ 3 months ago
Comment removed
jacob1233546 3 months ago
@UCEMARBLEZ Did you go to school when you were a kid?
jacob1233546 3 months ago
@jacob1233546 no, not really. But by the looks of things, you just enjoy questioning. So by my logic, you have no reason to ask.
UCEMARBLEZ 3 months ago
@UCEMARBLEZ Either you're smarter than me and what you said to me doesn't quite get processed exactly or I don't know what your logic is. And I'm impressed at how you didn't "really" go to school, and you don't sound well stupid.
jacob1233546 3 months ago
@jacob1233546 I'm not all that stupid, and all this talk that dropouts are dumb is just dumb.
UCEMARBLEZ 3 months ago
@UCEMARBLEZ We'll see in WW3 =D
LaughingGor888 3 months ago
You bite the hand which feed you before ,Chineses !
America kicked butts Japan in 1945 , that's the way America help you get out of Japan 's domination .
America help you before 1940 , without America , 6 Europe countries torn down China to 6 pieces ...Now , you want to fight with uncle Sam ... Are you human or animal , China-men ?
huynhminhtri 3 months ago
@huynhminhtri if u are making payments on ur house and u miss one the bank takes ur house away; who owns ur house? the bank.
if we are in debt to china then who owns the US??
so whos feeding who?
jamnin94 3 months ago
@jamnin94 , Chineses wanted to make war with uncle Sam ,when they become a loser , the winner don't need to pay back anything for the loser .....That's natural laws !
huynhminhtri 3 months ago
@jamnin94 1st of all China owns a small fraction of America's debt, the majority is owned by American.
2nd Your analogy about an individual getting his house taken away compared to global economics only shows how little you actually know.
3rd As far as feeding, China is net importer of food, where as America is a net exporter (I know you didn't mean literally but it's worth knowing)
AmzitheSoldier 3 months ago
chinise are only second because they have a lot of troops but they suck
rey10lovecarmen23 3 months ago
fk the china .......
love0rdie 3 months ago
@love0rdie are you jealous ? india boy ?
xieyihui33 3 months ago
no...because india can be powerful nation in world. but our fking politicians sucking our bloods .... out side india they deposited as black money million crore....funds...in swizz bank..but still most indians dont hav food.
i like NATO..
love0rdie 3 months ago
I'm a Russian , and the Russia are third powerful country in the world i am so happy to hear that and our friend China now are second powerful , go China and Russia to against America , US suck
xieyihui33 3 months ago
@xieyihui33 your country is 2 powerful country in the world and america has nato and nato has 3,000,000 troops combine and russia and china combine is 3,000,000 soldiers so it would be a horrible war most of the world is allies with america
atomicman112 3 months ago
@atomicman112 there is also syria and iran with russia and china
slingmoe94 3 months ago
@xieyihui33
ashamed of being called a chinese...??
rohitb3 3 months ago
Also Russia have to be in first place because couple years ago maybe in 90's or 80's Russian specnaz GRU kicked American soldiers asses in middle east or elsewhere and captured helicopter supercobra. i know all that because american soldier who survived told about that
Russia1117 3 months ago
@Russia1117 how long did it take you to make that up, ask anybody non-bias on this planet and lemme know what the answer is
AllAboutAmerica 3 months ago
Comment removed
Russia1117 3 months ago
@AllAboutAmerica it take me 1 minute. and the answer is, Fuck USA and NATO.
Russia1117 3 months ago
Russia in first place, even American learning to Russian systema combat fight
Russia1117 3 months ago
this is possibly one of the most acurate top tens ive seen. definitly the top 5 are acurate. good video
bearsfan54beast 3 months ago
Philippines is No.11 sorry only says Top 10..... :) peace!
Imbalance15 3 months ago
Russia in First !Facken Americans
Jungerooo 3 months ago
@Jungerooo russia fell behand in military america won the space race and america has star wars not the movie a space missile defence im sorry your country lost the cold war
atomicman112 3 months ago
The pictures are just wrong!!!! No relation with the the countries!!!
imsiddhartha 3 months ago
if hal tejas is better and su 30 mk then why u r buying ef and rafale
if they r better than ef and rafale
then why u produce more tejas and mk for kind info su 30¬s are coming in 1990 so they r so old for u and your desire is to become world power {super}
so this dream falling u in whole your fire of becoming world power is shown in mmrca deal and new deal of 160 choppers
usman92ful 3 months ago
@usman92ful nobody compares tejas with su-30mki... Tejas is an interceptor... Su-30mki is an air superiority fighter... The job of tejas is to intercept the enemy aircraft... not to go on an attack mission!!!
imsiddhartha 3 months ago
rather say russia in first.
Alinescafe08 3 months ago
China thinks they can scare the world... not while America Israel, Britain.. India, France, Germany, South korea, Taiwan, Canada, Japan, Australia, Italy, Scandanavia, Turkey, exist.. suckers.. Russia,China, North Korea only threat to democracy.. Iran would be crushed in a few days by nuclear warheads coming from everywhere.. Democracy rules..
MrADUB1987 3 months ago
whats the name of this song ??
griselwurscht 3 months ago
2:50 they are 4th powerful country in world of hitting women's??? i think they should try to hit iran and they MIGHT deserve being the #4!
no0bscape 3 months ago
US (until 10 yrs from now) ,then russia(until 10 yrs from now) ,then china (until 10 yrs from now).
idontcare3373 3 months ago
germanys way over france
DDFRESH96 3 months ago
SEGUA POWER!!!
jdawginthehood 4 months ago
long live NATO: Albania,Belgium,Bulgaria,Canada,Croatia,Czech Republic,Denmark,Estonia,France,Germany,Greece(yes, not allies with stupid russia),Hungary,Iceland,Italy,Latvia,Lithuania,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Poland,Portugal,Romania,Slovakia,Slovenia,Spain,Turkey,UK, and USA
fuck everyone else
smellmyclock 4 months ago
Russia has geographical advantage ..(extreme Siberian cold climate will favor them as they have defeated other armies over there and have a lot of war experience ) ; similarly China has high- altitude advantage over India (Himalayan range border)..and remember Tech alone won't win you a war ..there are other factors that decides victory and losses..
MrKasperabhay 4 months ago
@MrKasperabhay thats why the british train in .extreme cold climate, altitude jungles deserts so were ready for any war
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
IMO
1. Russia and US are tied
2. China
3. India
TheMaximumfail 4 months ago
@TheMaximumfail If you think the US and Russia are tied, you're delusional >.>'
AmzitheSoldier 3 months ago
TURKEYYYYY !!!!!!!!! WTF
Thefafafanta 4 months ago
USA then Russia then India then China
kunbob100 4 months ago
@kunbob100 hahaha india thay have a 2 rate military lack loads of equipment thay dont have gear to invade a country by air or land there only good against neighboring countrys
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
haha...lack loads of equipements..?..funny..
Considering a heavy ,med and light transport aircraft can carry ATLEAST 80,40,20 troops resp. the calculated troops comes to 9680.
Plus including the ambhibious ships the calculated troops comes to 5000.
Total 14680.
I didn even calculate 150 transport helicopters.
If ur overpatriotism wont let u accept that your equipements are inferior, just know India has 5 times the troops,10 times the tank,3 times the combat jets than Uk...Simple!
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 lol looks like you dont no nout transport helis hahahaa wot there gona fly 1000s of miles
and a forces of around 14.000 is nout against a well trained military plus thay only have 36 jets protecting all them and india have over 1 million men wot a waste if thay cant use them
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@rohitb3 size mean fuck all we have 10 times more attack helicopters and 100 times better
britian as the best trained military in the world 80.000 men in navy alone and then probley about 100.000 merchant navy and airforce about 10.000 and india airforce is only about 3.000
and india have 178 good combat jets britian have 207 nealy half of india combat jets are mig 21 ahaha
ye india may have 4 times more men but thay cant use them
and britians tank crew would wipe out indias
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
How many attk helis do u exaclty have...and which ones?
Indian navy has 55k and Airforce has 170k Active Personnel...
Total of 304 MODERN combat jets + 422 Older ones
Mig 21s,though old, performed superbly at Red Flag, look it up
5 times the more men can be used gradually in a war....
Tank crew claims and being best trained claims....BLANK.....one of our well renowned analyst even told
that "Indian Marcos are perhaps even better trained than thr western counterparts"
Cont.
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 it dont matter how many men you have
india 178 su-30mki
7 hal =185
it dont matter how many men you have my unit in afghan took on over 5 times more men even my 20 unit took out over 130 men in 3 days
plus britian can easy get 1 million men
all rest shit
britian is none around the world as haveing the best trained military
Indian Marcos have nout on SBS seal team
Indian Marcos is not even good about on par with royal marine commandos wots not even a SF unit
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
cont....
And yes, about the tanks....Jalshwa carry Atleast 30(Not sure,should be more) and Shardul/ MAgar can carry 10 each...Total 90 tanks and 24 II76 carrying another 24 T-90s
Total 104 tanks.
So if India wants to go on an all out rampage here are the nos which can be transprted at one go, ATLEAST 14680 troops and 104 tanks. and always come back for another load....
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 ....Jalshwa 12 tanks Shardul 10 Magar class 15 thats 70 and II76 cant carry anything over 40 tonnes so no tansk
and do you no how long it takes to travel by sea it took britian over 3 weeks to the falklands and thats nout against a well trained military india only have 36 rubbish jets thats why britian is gettign 140 f-35 stealth fighters on there 2 new supper carriers
britian even took over 40.000 men to the falklands and there only small islands britian can take over 200.000
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Jalashwa is 3 times bigger than Magar or Shardul, that's y i said 30.
Uk has 160 Efs...Decent....and 136 Tornedos..OLD....will be replaced with F-35s in 2017.
and Britain gradually took 40k men to falklands,....not at once...
Dont talk about the future, cz on India's side...Stealth Attack helis, 3 carriers, two 5th gen and two 4++ gens ,etc are comin up.
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 lol it dont matter how big a ship is lol and its not 3 times bigger its only 8.000 tonnes overs are around 5.000 tonnes its like the Albion class each ship can carry 6 MBT and thats 20.000 tonnes but the ship is not just for carrying tanks its for over things its like the bay class with is less that can carry 24 MBT and thats arounf 16.000 tonnes
and the tornados are not old in 2003 thay all had a full refit all the tec is new its just the airframe there the best bombing jets ever
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Both Bay class and Jalashwa is 16000 tons FULL LOAD, so im guessin Jalashwa can carry similar no. of tanks.
And dont u feel weird...?.U Brits claim Ef is the best jet,Tornedo is the best bomber,Challenger 2 best tank,Type 45 best ship,etc,etc...dont u feel that's jus ridiculous? Makers of Hal Tejas say it's the Best jet in it's class, but we are smart enough to know those are marketing tactics. Upgraded Torndeos are old like Upgraded Mig-27/Jaguar/Mig 21
Cont...
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 you dont have a clue do you just because its the same tonnage dont mean it can carry the same ablion class is bigger than bay class but bay class can carry 4 times more tanks
and i claim because its true EF best jet of its kind f-22 is better but different kind of jets CH2 best tank been battle proven tornado is the best bombing jets its very good and flying under radar and low level flying and type 45 is the most advanced warship astute class most advanced sub
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@rohitb3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> and no britian took 40.000 men at once the war only lasted about 42 days it took britian over 3 week get there thats over 21 days
and india dont even no if thay will be able build there own 5th gen fighter it took them 20 years to build there own tank india is not good at building things all there good for is cheap labour
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
India had it's flag on the moon with it's own spacecraft, 4th nation to do so...
5th gen fighters....not a big deal.....
You didn calculate the 4+ gen Mig-29s and 4th gen Mirage 2000...?...Funny..lol
Mig-29SMT is probably one of the most advanced Air Superiority fighter today (Total 304 modern jets)
Well, in 1971 war India made pak surrender in 13 dAys..... Training...?? anyways now Training facilities are even better..and the view of that analyst Maroof Raza cant b ignored
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 mig 29 are not 4+ gen ahhahaha mig 29 is not even in top 20 modern jet fighters its shit like i said f-15 f-16 have shot them down plus india pilots are not that good
the only reason india won in 1971 was because east pakistan was on indias side pakistan had to travel 1000 miles across india to fight if india tryed to invade pakistan thay would of not won like all the over wars
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
just one correction
Indian pilots are one of the BEST ....I wouldn say the only bEST coz i respect pilots of other Afs as well.
Red Flag Director "This is one of the finest airforce which has ever visited Red Flag"
And i came through an article , which said that during an Indo-Uk Join AF ex. , Uk used all it's Best and most experience pilots and IAF used it's intermediate/youung pilots.
So pls dont comment shit about Indian pilots or of any AF pilot, jsut shows ur knowledge.
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 pakistan lost 19 aircraft india lost over 100
falklands war argentina lost just under 100 aircraft britian RAF lost none
and dont belive everything you read britian wouldnt send there best pilots all british pilots are best as thay can be trained and thay usually send beginer pilots so thay can learn stuff wots the piont in sending pilots who aready no wot there doing so thats how i no your chatting shit
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
man..u dont gv up...
1965 India lost 70..
Btw...do u know somethin....?
The same pilots who were flying in 1965 are still flying our jets today...we still follow the same training programme....
And about the REcent and most latest exercises...they were some ghost indian pilots who were the best in the REd flag 2008
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 well if thay was flying in 1965 thay would be atleast 67 and i no pilots and you need be very fit so i dont think thay would be good pilots at that ang because you need very quick reactions
and if you still follow the same training programme i think you need some help up dateing it then you no how much jets have changed since then and tec on the aircraft and the new missiles wot you need to no how to defeat
su-30mki dont even have super criuse
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
huh..?...i was being saracastic about the same pilots from the 1965 and the same training programme, n about doiin timepass with the Hal AMCA...:/
I thought u wud be smart enough to understand.
with all your wild and overpatriotic claims its kinda difficult for me to argue sensibly.
EF hasnt been fitted with the AESA radars yet, probably in 2015.
yea, Supercruise is the ONLY upper hand which the Ef has over the Su-30mki.
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 EF is better all round than the su-30mki name one thing better and yes the eurofighter dose have the aesa radar
and i dont think you was being saracastic untill i proved you lie was rubbsih
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Every Department......Su-30mki is Bigger, hence carries more and better variety of weapons, more range (Ef-2900km,Su-3000km) , More speed(Ef-Mach 2,Su-Mach 2.35) , Thrust Vectoring...so its "Super maneuvarable". Ef i wud say is more agile, cz it's smaller..and has supercruise
EF uses a Pulse Dopler radar similar to our Hal Tejas, AESA radars will be equipped soon. So we also hv a better radar with adavanced radar jamming features and engagin features..
rohitb3 3 months ago
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Ef's range is 2900km, if u say otherwise, tell me where can i look it up?
EJ2000 engine is so weak, we declined it's offer to be used in the Hal Tejas.
AESA radars are almost ready for the Su-30mki(Super Sukhois)
And dont believe that Mach 1.9 speed for the Su-30mki. Look up IAF's official site (Mach 2.35) All sukhois have a min speed of mach 2.25, inlcudin the su-27.
About 1hrs maint. i'll look it up ...
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 my mate called ryan naylor is a eurofighter pilot
and ok su-30mki can get the AESA radar i fort the nose was to small but i was wrong
u can find anywhere were it seys su-30mki top speed mach 2.35 i seen a su-30MKM with a top speed of 2.25
but still these thing dont mean much in battle its the tec onboard and its stealth like EF is 20 times smaller on radar very big advantage EF radar alot better EF missile system
and also EF as look and lock and its all voice controll
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
"The CAPTOR-E is based on the CAPTOR radar CURRENTLY IN SERVICE on Eurofighter production aircraft"
CAPTOR-E is the AESA variant and normal CAPTOR is the pulse dopler.
That's what i said, U CAn find all sources sayin it has a top speed of Mach 2.35(except wiki)
Offcourse onboard tech is imp, thats y the Su has such an advanced and complex avionics.
Ef's RCS is less, but it's not stealth.
Voice control...cool didn know about that one
Cont...
rohitb3 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Cont....
Voice control will help in quicker reaction, but anyways...are u aware the Su-30mki is a twin seater....one controllin the jet and the other the missiles. U can guess how much will this enhance the performance in the air. Specialisation!
Anyways, honestly speaking Ef seems more like our Hal Tejas, a bigger and slightly more advanced variant of it.
Both have same Pulse dopler radars, very Low Rcs, Delta wings, similar maneuvarability and agility,etc.
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 just because there are to crew dont mean its better it just means thay couldnt get one person to do the job thats wot i mean EF as loads of tec to help there pilots thay only need one crew the only EF fighters with 2 crew are for training
it is said a 5 year old kid could fly a eurofighter because its so easy
and thay dont have same RCS lol su-30mki is 20 times bigger on radar
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
oh...so u wanna say that we modified the basic model of the Su-30 for timepass?....com on dude...dont sounds desperate...., 2 pilots add a 2nd dimension increasing the performance by SEVERAL Folds....like a two seater car,one guy on the steering wheel another with a gun from the window.
And those similarities i was comparing Ef with Hal Tejas,both hv low RCS,similar agility,maneuverability,same kinda radars,etc
Cont....
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 hahahaha dont compare a 2 seater jet with a car with a gun hahaha have you even seen inside of a jet a 2 seater jet and a single do the same job just as good its even said single seaters are better
and dont compare Hal Tejas wit a EF thats just stupid
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wiganerrmc
Well, the car eg., that's how i explain a kid....in other more professonal words, Adding another seat is not as simple as that as it requires added elements and improved structural stiffness. A 2nd seat on a trainer and a 2nd seat on a combat aircraft does a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT job, We have improved and modified the MKI from the orignal single seater Su-30. Same goes for the FGFA from the orignial Pak Fa.
Dont make me repeat that...
Cont...
rohitb3 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
So ,Finally
Su-30mki has more speed, better maneuverability,better PESA radar,Better Range,Better Weapons load,Thrust Vectoring
EF has Supercruise,Voice command and a low RCS(Which wont be much helpful against an advanced PESA radar)
And in a real fight, 2 things will be important, BVR First strike capability, which the Su-30mki enjoys with it's KS-172 missile
Super maneuverability which again the Su-30mki enjoys with Thrust Vectoring.
watch?v=gAlpgOG6z6I
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 wot hahhahah EF as better radar same range better weapons plus the new EF are getting thrust vectroing PESA radar is old
and it dont mean nout if that have 2 crew apart from thay need training proper thats the reason thay have 2 crew so if one makes a mistake i as my mate that who is a EF pilot
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
i doubt ur in the military ....
Su-30mki is bigger, more fuel capacity=better range.
Ef's range - 2900km , Ferry range(minimal weapons) - 3750km.
Su-30mki's range - 3000km , ferry Range(minimal weapons) - 5000km
As i said u dont know about AFs at all....a twin seater fighter aircraft is different from a trainer aircraft...lol..
i wont bother explainin this basic concept......the 2nd pilot role is completely diff.
AESA radar hasnt been intergrated yet so PESA radars are best now
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 i am in the military im a royal marine commando j coy 42cdo
and wot the fuck dose range got to do with anything if thay wonted to fly long missions thay would get refuled in the air anyway
and i no the wot a trainer aircraft is a twin seater and a single do the same job
wot hahah PESA is old thay even have AESA on warships
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Okie, Range doesn matter much, BVR(Su-30mki with the longest range missile in the world) and Dog Fight does(Thrust Vectoring)
U dont know anythin about radars...do u? Okie i'll teach u.
AESA Radars - Being developed for Su-30mki,EF,Rafale,Hal Tejas,etc. Can Track upto 30 targets,engaging 6 simultaneously,highly resistant to jammers.
PESA radar - Su-30mki. Track 15 targets,engages 4
Pulse Dopler Radar- Modern radar used by EF,Hal Tejas,etc Tracks 10, engages "multiple" targets.
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 it dont matter if a air to air missile as 400km the su-30mki radar range is 200km but it would only able see a EF on radar at about 20miles max more like 10 miles but with its advanced jamming aswell you probley wouldnt able get a lock anyway before its 2 late
and yes i no abit about radars
and so wot if the PESA can track 15 the radar is rubbish for jets because of the loud engines
and EF is getting thrust vectoring
but a Ef would shoot any jet down before it new it
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 are you stupid or something of course RCS works thay wouldnt use it if it didnt wot would be the point in stealth jets
only good jet imdia has is su-30mki and hal tejas but none of there are even close to the EF or even over euro jets like rafale
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Having a completely Stealthy aircraft(5th gen) is a different story. Havin a low RCS is a chance factor...u might get caught or u might not.
Tejas has a lower RCS than EF considering it's smaller and has 60% composite radar absorbing material.
Mig 29 and Mirage 2000 are some of the Most advanced 4th gen jets today,everyone knows that, and they flew awesomely in 1999 war against Pakistan
Su-30mki will remain our BEST frontline fighter,even after buyin Ef/Rafale.
Cheers !
rohitb3 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
cont...
no offence, ur kinda overpatriotic or thick....keep reading the previous comments till u digest that Su-30mki is superior in every aspect except RCS,Supercruise.
RAF is designed to take on Iraq or Afghanistan
IAF is designed to take on China
Only if u combine Uk/French airforce together with EF,Rafale,Mirage 2000 and Tornedo, only then u can somewhat match the IAF..
This is my last comment, if u hv any more question keep reading the previous comments,u'll get the ans.
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 RAF is about 10 times more capable than IAF its not about numbers
and even 5 gen fighters like the PAK FA that RCS is not much better than the EF but f-22 is alot better at 0.15 but still a EF beat a f-22
and Tejas RCS is not better than EF tejas is 1.5m2 and EF is 1m2
and thay didnt do to good against pakisan because india lost 5 times more aircraft
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
In simple words, u dont know anything....learn more to debate...
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 i no alot about military iv been a royal marine commando for 6 years my dad was in the paras for 22 years so a grew up around military
i have friends in all military branches i even have a friend who is a eurofighter pilot
its you who dont no anything
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
1st of all, a military guy wont waste time fightin on youtube, he wont hv time for that!
2nd, India lost 70 aircrafts ,pak lost 20,in 1965... that's not 5 times
Anyways...im talkin about the 1999 war...when Mig 29 and Mirage 2000 existed..lol
3rd, A soldier's job is to train and stuff, not bcome a defense analyst, like me.
4th...i give proper evidence while i argue, u dont.
5th..i have nothin against a Ef/Rafale, as we are gonna aquire one anways.
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 we dont work 24/7 and plus im at home at min i have be back at base at 6am i had the weekend off
and it seys india lost 100+ and pakistan lost 19
and i train people im a platoon weapons instructor with advanced urban combat
and you sey your a defense analyst well you must be a very bad one i think you need study more because the amout of bullshit you talk
and i give proper evidence
wiganerrmc 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wiganerrmc
Im not a defense analyst by profession..lol...
Anyways...some of your funny statements.. which show the level of your knowledge..
1. EF as better radar same range better weapons .9Compare the range of weapons in wikipedia....LOL)
2.PESA radar is old
3. Having Twin Seaters is like a Trainer aircraft.
4 it seys india lost 100+ and pakistan lost 19 ( u use some pirated wiki?)
5. Tejas RCS is not better than EF tejas is 1.5m2 and EF is 1m2 (Tejas is SMALLER..duh)
rohitb3 3 months ago
Comment removed
iamgig9876 3 months ago
@rohitb3 brits are fucking dumasses who lost all wars, the only thing they won by themselves recently was worl war 2, and we had to bail them out (they were losing until we joined) u r russian jet might beat the eurotrash dubstep but our f 35 fucks your sukhoi in everything. u say thrust vectoring/ say VTOL
iamgig9876 3 months ago
@iamgig9876
F-35 is in the testing phase...will be inducted from 2016 onwards....
And we are coming up with two 5th generation aircrafts as well,Hal/Sukhoi FGFA and HAL AMCA........ to tackle the F-22 and F-35 :)
And F-35's full capabilities havnt been tested yet...it has been tested only till the speed of Mach 1.6
That's REALLY slow even for a 4th gen,
rohitb3 3 months ago
@rohitb3 yeah i understand how long you will have to scroll down to read this, but anyways i can thrust vector too you know what i mean ;)
iamgig9876 3 months ago
@rohitb3 IAF > RAF, but usaf>>>Russian Air Force>> India ir Force (btw dont correct mme spelling i type fast)
iamgig9876 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wiganerrmc
a low rcs might work againt average radars, not against a powerful PESA radar.
Anyways in short IAF vs RAF U have 160 EF(4.5th gen) and 136 Tornedos(4th gen,considering upgrades)
WE have
180 Su-30mki(4.5th gen) watch?v=gAlpgOG6z6I 7 Hal Tejas(4+ gen) watch?v=4hvoZ0wfQ6Q 68 Mig 29SMT(4+gen) watch?v=TKC6Wh_g2ds 51 Mirage 2000 (4th gen)
150 Mig 21,about 270 total Jaguars and Mig-27(3.5th gen) Watch those vids to learn more about the uniqueness of each aircraft.
rohitb3 3 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Cont..
Anyways, i contacted people whoa re related with the Indian defense organisation through military threats....they said that II76 can carry 1 MBT each.
And the Transport aircrafts roughly have a range of upto 6000km
India is just missing a few more LCUs right now which are on order(8 of them).
And hving a few LCUs more doesn not make Uk stronger .
Uk cant invade India,India cant invade Uk with it's current capabilities.
But a war on neutral lands.....Indian Victory.
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 ye transport aircraft can go 6000km some can even get air re fule but helis cant go 6000km
india is missing laods in there navy thay even said thay need bigger amphibious assault vessels
and we dont just have more LCU royal navy is 4 times bigger in tonnage we have larger and better ships
britian could invade india very easy the 3 navys can take easy over 200.000 men even more just in 1 of the larger MN ships can carry 5.000 men and these over 500 ships in the MN
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Cont..
Yea, they need Bigger Amphibious assault vessels, that's why 8 are on order.
LArger and Better Ships..?? .just 3 Type 45s?
Even if Uk comes with 500k men(Hypothetical) at once, they'll still be blown off within 7 days.
India is prepared for a 2 front war in it's territory...Motto "Defeat Pakistan,Hold China"
Most of Uk's navy will go down in the Indian ocean,remanin whichever ships mk till land will be taken out immidiately.
Cont...
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 yes alot better ships not just better RN is 4 times bigger than india navy in tonnage
and it dont matter how many men you have thats why i no you are not in the military
and we have 6 type 45 built 1 type 45 can do the job of every indias destroyers at 1s
defeated pakistan 1s lost to china because china took land
and there is no missile in the world wot can sink a type 45 no missile can get past missile system
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Do u actually think RAF with Ef and Tornedos stand a chance against IAF with Su-30mki,Tejas,Mirage 2000,Mig 29SMT,Mig-21,Jaguar,Mig 27 and 300 Drones?
Su-30mki vs EF
watch?v=9w-cxHNMP2o
Do u think your infantry with 200k men and 500 tanks can take on 1.2mil men and 5000 tanks.
Arjun is better than Challenger in EVERY department(according to charts)
YEs, the navies are somewhat even, India is bigger,has a carrier, and better frigates.
Uk has more LCUs,better destroyers and subs.
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 hahah that video a stupid russia girl made it shes about sey su-30 is better even tho its far from a EF even won a f-22
mirage 2000 ok mig 29 shit loads of f-16 have shot down migs and 2 EF won 8 f-16 so mig 29 wouldnt stand a chance mig 21 i wouldnt even use them for training in never mind combat jaguar shit thats why british got rid of them and yes 200k men and 500 tanks could easy take on 1.2 million men 500
ww2 30.000 british troops took on over 1 million italy and won
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@rohitb3 arjun is not better than challenger 2 hahah CH2 is the best tank in the world and its battle proven unlike urjun
and india dont have better frigaes lol there frigates thay use are guided missile frigate british guided missile warship is the type 45 the worlds most advanced warship
the type 23 is the best anti sub frigatein the world and were even getting new 1s
and eurofighter is getting trust vectoring today it is the best jet of its kind and 2nd best combat jet after f-22
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
yes ok CH2 defeated a few iraqi T-72s to bcome the best tank.
you are too overpatriotic, forget it...
that vid, the missiles used are "Ks-172" , range 400km, can take out an Ef even bfore the Ef can engage it.
Mig-29 is considered better than Mirage 2000 in Air-Air combat.
200k men,500 tanks can take out 1.2m men and 5000 tanks.?
great
Sad , that we dont consider Uk a military power anymore and Usa is more worried about Russia,China and India
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 yes when nato invaded iraq about 400 challenger 1 and abrams took out around 5500 iraqi tanks with no losses
and just because a missile range is 400km dont mean you can shoot a jet down at 400km fuck me you no fuck all its not even worth takeing to you the su-30mki radar as a 200km tracking range
su-30mki RCS is 20m2
EF is only 1m2 so on radar you would able see a su-30mki 20 times farer on radar you would only able see a EF from about 20 miles tops its size of a swan on radar
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Su-30mki PESA radar are too powerful ...and okie....u have any missile with 200km range...?..NO
Anyways...forget it...personally i dont consider Uk much of a challenge at all...
Challenger 2 tanks are soo heavy and only got a Power/Weight ratio of 19.2 hp/ton...:/
Ef is more like a slight bigger and advanced version of the Hal Tejas..
Anyways , forget it..
we are tryin to overtake China right now, and it may be possible by 2015 seeing the military projects .
Respect!
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 and wot is the point in haveing a missile wot range is 200km the farest ever air to air kill with a jet is probley about 10 miles
the eurofighter uses a new gen of aircraft radar called euroradar CAPTOR and EF also uses the passive infra red airborne tracking equipment called PIRATE and it also as a look and lock helmet wot the pilot wears plus everthing in the EF is voice controled
and why do you think pakistan is sucking up to china now because nato fucked them off
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
bcoz it Can destroy enemy jets at that range...they wont mk a missile just like that...
I dunno much about the Ef's radar, but i do know it CANT track 15 targets and engage 4 simultaneously.
Pakistan was always an ally to China..
y do u think India accepted the 1965 ceasefire even though we were winning....cz China was threatning an invasion.
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 yes EF can also track 15 and engages 4 targets at once EF radar alot better and can also do steath tracking
plus EF radar is AESA su-30mki is PESA
old passive electronically scanned radars spread their broadcasts out across a band of frequencies, which makes it very difficult to detect over background noise. AESAs allow ships and aircraft to broadcast powerful radar signals while still remaining stealthy
PESA is old
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@rohitb3 its sad we have never considerd india a major power
Britain has the third largest declared defence budget in the world, after the US and China at $74 Billion in 2010. It is one of only five recognised nuclear powers, with no more than 240 active Nuclear weapons and is deemed to have the second highest power projection capability in the world, behind the United States
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ i did not write that
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Uk's budget is soo high bcoz of the over expensive things they tend to develop....a EF costs 90mil Euros :/
If we wud have developed such a jet, that wud hv been a failed project.
5th gen FGFA will cost 100mil dollars
And i always accepted Uk has power projection/ambhibious capabilities more than India.
An average person might not consider India a power, i didn myself when i was bout 15... at that time i used to consider Uk to be 2nd to Usa.
but now, i say otherwise
Cheers
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 russia is makeing the FGFA india is only putting it together in india
india have very little to do with it russia is building the engines the airframe and so on india could never build an advanced aircraft on there own
and why would it be a failed project its alot cheaper than the f-22 but as won that and 100 million is not to bad for wot it can do
and britian as the 2nd most capable force in the world
but that dont mean 2nd most powerful
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
Sukhoi's director, Mikhail Pogosyan, "We will share the funding, engineering and intellectual property in a 50-50 proportion."
Yea...India cant, India is doin timpass and wasting money on HAL AMCA.
That's y they stopped producing F-22s.
Yea, that's what i said, capable in terms of projecting power overseas...that doesn mean you army is that strong
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 ye india is doing stuff to the eloctronic but nout to the engine of airframe
and the reason f-22 was stopped is so thay can get more f-35 US is getting about 2400 f-35 which will cost around 350 billion
and no but it means we have the power to invade country aross the sea or by the air unlike the rest of the over countrys
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc
I think India the airframe as well...
Usa is already bankrupt, but also fears a 3rd WW with China....little option it has..
Yes, Uk can.....But cannot defeat any of the Top 10 powers that way....
rohitb3 4 months ago
@rohitb3 top ten powers britian is top 4th power and its alot harder to invade a country than to defend a country
only country wot could do a full scale invation is US
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@kunbob100 Thats wrong :P
IMFLondon 3 months ago
nuclear power is better then this tanks,plans and other!
tigrixxxman 4 months ago
Now that i think about it, China is on its way to the top pretty fast. How fast they have been modernizing is outstanding. They are currently holding the worlds biggest navy (# of ships) and its (gross) economy is only helping them even more. They also have a great UAV program going on that is pretty much the best in the world. Russia should be worried unlike the US. We have the Atlantic and out outstanding navil power. Russia is only a short drive away. Oh, and where the hell is Turkey!?!?!?!?
MrCMN94 4 months ago
@smaltalkfan Dude!!!! 600,000,000 soldiers that are way over there in Asia. Try to get them even close to the US. Will Never happen. Plus the US has bigger guns. In battle and in our pants. lol Poor asians.
MrCMN94 4 months ago
I can see how Israel is up there. The US sends them all the money in the world. And China. Im sorry but its not going to be a superpower.... They have a lot of people. Well thats great. Try to get all those people over on to US soil. Thats just going to be a lot of target practice for our Navy and Air Force. It should be American, Russia.... Then who cares about the other ones because they dont even come close. lol
MrCMN94 4 months ago
@MrCMN94 china is on the way of takeing over US even US have said there scared of the progress there makeing in military thay have built the best jet in the world j-20 thay are building like a new warship every month thay are building 2 5th gen fighters thay also spend 350 billion on defence about which in turms of spending is more than US ye US spend about 600 billion but thay get overpriced and ripped off
its like china j-10 the programe only cost 78 million now like US f-22 cost 80 billion
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
@wiganerrmc dumb ass here are our allies NATO: Albania,Belgium,Bulgaria,Canada,Croatia,Czech Republic,Denmark,Estonia,France,Germany,Greece(yes, not allies with stupid russia),Hungary,Iceland,Italy,Latvia,Lithuania,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Poland,Portugal,Romania,Slovakia,Slovenia,Spain,Turkey,UK, and USA
i realy dont think china wants to fuck with us, plus china has shitty technology, really they are strength in numbers, and china doesnt ahve as much allies as us
ur a fag
smellmyclock 4 months ago
@smellmyclock If you think China has a 3rd grade military such as the Libya has/had, then you're seriously underestimating the Chinese military. US defence computer networks are one of the most fragile in the world, let alone those from NATO countries and China can easily hack into those systems and render US-NATO forces half-blind. But a war between NATO and China is a NATO-fanboy's wet dream anyway.
TheBrolit 4 months ago
@smellmyclock well im from the UK so im with you on that im also in the military
and yes china dont have that many close military relations with many countrys apart from pakistan and north korea
but nato as fucked pakistan off thats why there sucking up 2 china now
wiganerrmc 4 months ago
rofl.... no.4 and no.3 duude u cant put Israel and Russia near side to side omg...... No logic dudee How some1 can bee ratarded sooo much ... Israel 4Milions population Russia 150Milions and much more high tech weapons.... pointlesss.. Russia can do rampage on Israel an crush tham in ONLY ONE Wave..........
cte4dota 4 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Ein Amerikanisches Politikwissenschaftler sagt die Wahrheit hier das beweis:
/watch?v=X6n