Evolution created various living things. These include pathogenic viruses and pathogenic bacteria that kill us and make us suffer in horrible ways. Why would God allow evolution of such things.
Humans diverged from our ancestral species about 100 000 years ago i.e. modern humans are at least 100 000 years old. There is evidence that 70 000 years ago, we went through a bottleneck. We almost starved and suffered from many genetic diseases all of that time. .
"any scientific endeavor is an exercise in futility"
Tell that to the billions who would not be alive if not for scientific farming techniques and modern medicine. All those scientists sitting on their arses trying to look busy have done quite a bit for your quality of life you ungrateful hypocrite - (I take that back if you are Amish).
Your hypocrisy is showing. Must you always display your epithets?
How do you know or so certain that tens of billions of people are alive because of newer farming techniques and medicines which have always existed in this reality perspective?
How do you know what you are seeing, experiencing or believe is reality?
Example: Penicillin always existed since life forms began on earth. How fortuitous that a man came along and found that it killed bacteria.
Was it an accident or was it always going to be found by some scientific methodology?
Was it a scientists efforts to discover this antibiotic, was it an inevitable by evolution chance or was it by Design? This example applies to all potentials of meant to be events. Sometimes a plane falls out of the sky into flames and many walk away and a man slips on a curb and dies. What are the chances?
You are showing egocentricity when you say that discoveries are the efforts of condensed energy that forms what is commonly called a brain in a closed cranium.
Are you absolutely certain that men using science discovered anything that wasn't predestined to be revealed?
You are quite ridiculous. I am not going to waste time on you. Try this video - watch?v=sxtbcOEtpoE (Why Do People Laugh at Creationists part 25) by Thunderf00t. Bye bye.
So you don't understand science's QM but rely on the square earth theory. You are a waste of my time. Try this Why DO People Laugh at Evolutionists. watch?v=fztDnIthQw8
You obviously don't understand Quantum Uncertainty theory based on science which totally discounts everything you propounded
I already explained that SCIENCE has no answers to anything. I have a minor in theoretical physics and have access to actual physicists who understand that you are correct. Nobody understands anything.
You must have a brain tumor as you cannot follow the logic that scientists have a wonderful expensive occupation which includes playing with themselves.
Take care of yourself and hope that your brain injury improves over time.
Your right... no one can understand QM for it is counterintuitive to anything you can get your mind around.
I understand enough to know that I don't know anything except for the fact that Dawkins was correct when in a moment of revealing that he actually knew ID is necessary for infinite complexity.
Your talking about gods and not Intelligent Design. People pray to monkey gods, fire , elephant , Jesus , allah , water, wind and Shiva gods.
I am not talking about a personal Christian god or anything like what you have been taught. For you to try to understand infinite wisdom is way above your pay grade.
Masterplans and reality are nothing like you or anyone else can understand or possibly comprehend. There is a designer but not a personal bearded monkey or Jeus god like man.
Again, you fail to tell us, even when prompted, to tell us which of these scientists are trained in a relevant discipline. In fact, you seem to suggest that there are no relevantly qualified scientists! Just as well we have theologians to tell us how the world works!
You seem to have no idea of what science is about - if I understand what your penultimate sentence means (a bit garbled). Science by definition is falsifiable - it doesn't deal in absolutes - that is its strength.
Rev, do you have difficulty with the English language? I didn't imply that there are no scientists or theologians of any discipline who are trained, schooled or capable of understanding how anything works. Its simply fact. You are the one who seems to have no idea of what science is in all its grand methodology. For science's inability to deal with the fact that there are no known absolutes which always leads to the conclusion that to date, they are simply doing busy work.
The complexity of reality is so infinitely impossible to understand with the finite ability scientists, theologians or Tarot card readers possess that there is no 'strength' in the scientific method whatsoever. Get used to the fact that any scientific endeavor is an exercise in futility. The ability to exist, think or understand why or how things are remains beyond the ability of the human senses to scientifically find any absolute answers.
The Creation Research Society currently has a membership of 650 scientists, each one holding a Masters degree or above in a recognized field of science. In a recent article Dr. Russell Humphreys, physicist at Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico, estimates that there are around 10,000 practicing professional scientists in the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day creation.
When asked to name a real modern scientist who believes in creation, we might start with Henry Morris. Of course, evolutionists will immediately object, claiming he isnt a real scientist. Why? Because he believes in creation. From an evolutionists point of view, anyone who believes in creation cant be a real scientist. Therefore, scientists like Henry Morris, John Morris, Larry Vardiman, Steve Austin, and Duane Gish can be discounted immediately because they work for the
Institute for Creation Research. Likewise, evolutionists wont acknowledge Michael Behe, Andrew Snelling, Donald deYoung, and Kurt Wise, regardless of their academic credentials, because their creationist leanings are well-known.
This is another example of how evolutionists use circular reasoning. Circular logic concludes that no real scientist rejects evolution because the very fact that he rejects evolution means he isnt a real scientist.
"The Creation Research Society currently has a membership of 650 scientists, each one holding a Masters degree or above in a recognized field of science."
I notice you do not specify how many are biologists or similar. Tell us how many are qualified in a relevant discipline if you want to make a point. I.e. be honest.
Rev the Creation Research Society has a small known membership of scientists while the actual number of scientists who would rather keep their jobs and positions numbers in the thousands.
Your question is specious as there are 0 (zero) qualified relevant scientists in any discipline who know the answer to reality. All scientists, physicists, biologists or any other pedigree can say with any ABSOLUTES that they have any idea of what is the ultimate TOE.
I have no idea of what you are referring to. Ben Stein simply portrayed the evolutionists in the guise of those trying to make nice to those ID scientists who do not follow the party line while at the same time that time telling them there is no place for free thought and experimentation that would threaten their hypothesis.
Where you quoted any of the scientists who don't believe evolution becoming killers of people who believed in evolution is as much a mystery as evolution speculation.
Er what church used to advocate IT (ID) but now you are free to think about everything of which you are capable. Evolution is simply another theory of life forms in which a lot of 'smart' people swallow hook, line and sinker.
Many great scientists think evolution laughable while many think it is the cat's meow. As for me, my mind is like Einstein in his famous statement - "I want to know Intelligent Design thoughts; the rest are details."
And can I recommend a good video which shows how many scientists really reject evolution? Or do you have a resource which lists every single scientist that rejects evolution?
The number of scientists against Evolution is less then 1%...
I agree with the Fundametalists and RIchard Dawkins. You can't believe in God and Evolution.
Ekendil 2 years ago
Why do you believe that the Creator of the universe cannot do anything like placing specific fixed laws like 'evolution' for instance?
Or as the evolutionist like to refer to the 'laws of nature', whatever that may be I don't believe that Richard Dawkins exists in the universe.
Type the following into the YouTube search line - Richard Dawkins does not exist
onycho1 2 years ago
No. That would be ridiculous.
Evolution created various living things. These include pathogenic viruses and pathogenic bacteria that kill us and make us suffer in horrible ways. Why would God allow evolution of such things.
Humans diverged from our ancestral species about 100 000 years ago i.e. modern humans are at least 100 000 years old. There is evidence that 70 000 years ago, we went through a bottleneck. We almost starved and suffered from many genetic diseases all of that time. .
Ekendil 2 years ago
"any scientific endeavor is an exercise in futility"
Tell that to the billions who would not be alive if not for scientific farming techniques and modern medicine. All those scientists sitting on their arses trying to look busy have done quite a bit for your quality of life you ungrateful hypocrite - (I take that back if you are Amish).
revjimbob 3 years ago
Your hypocrisy is showing. Must you always display your epithets?
How do you know or so certain that tens of billions of people are alive because of newer farming techniques and medicines which have always existed in this reality perspective?
How do you know what you are seeing, experiencing or believe is reality?
Example: Penicillin always existed since life forms began on earth. How fortuitous that a man came along and found that it killed bacteria.
onycho1 3 years ago
Was it an accident or was it always going to be found by some scientific methodology?
Was it a scientists efforts to discover this antibiotic, was it an inevitable by evolution chance or was it by Design? This example applies to all potentials of meant to be events. Sometimes a plane falls out of the sky into flames and many walk away and a man slips on a curb and dies. What are the chances?
onycho1 3 years ago
You are showing egocentricity when you say that discoveries are the efforts of condensed energy that forms what is commonly called a brain in a closed cranium.
Are you absolutely certain that men using science discovered anything that wasn't predestined to be revealed?
onycho1 3 years ago
You are quite ridiculous. I am not going to waste time on you. Try this video - watch?v=sxtbcOEtpoE (Why Do People Laugh at Creationists part 25) by Thunderf00t. Bye bye.
revjimbob 3 years ago
Bye Bye
So you don't understand science's QM but rely on the square earth theory. You are a waste of my time. Try this Why DO People Laugh at Evolutionists. watch?v=fztDnIthQw8
You obviously don't understand Quantum Uncertainty theory based on science which totally discounts everything you propounded
Ta Ta
onycho1 3 years ago
"You obviously don't understand Quantum Uncertainty theory" - onycho, youtube new age/creationist nutter
""I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics." - Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize winner.
You must be some kind of scientific prodigy. Either that or you're full of shite.
revjimbob 3 years ago
I already explained that SCIENCE has no answers to anything. I have a minor in theoretical physics and have access to actual physicists who understand that you are correct. Nobody understands anything.
You must have a brain tumor as you cannot follow the logic that scientists have a wonderful expensive occupation which includes playing with themselves.
Take care of yourself and hope that your brain injury improves over time.
No more from you....
onycho1 3 years ago
Your right... no one can understand QM for it is counterintuitive to anything you can get your mind around.
I understand enough to know that I don't know anything except for the fact that Dawkins was correct when in a moment of revealing that he actually knew ID is necessary for infinite complexity.
onycho1 2 years ago
if there is a master plan fate and destiny then there is no free will...
why do religious ppl pray to god? so that he/she might change hes/hers masterplan?
Darusdei 2 years ago
Your talking about gods and not Intelligent Design. People pray to monkey gods, fire , elephant , Jesus , allah , water, wind and Shiva gods.
I am not talking about a personal Christian god or anything like what you have been taught. For you to try to understand infinite wisdom is way above your pay grade.
Masterplans and reality are nothing like you or anyone else can understand or possibly comprehend. There is a designer but not a personal bearded monkey or Jeus god like man.
onycho1 2 years ago
Again, you fail to tell us, even when prompted, to tell us which of these scientists are trained in a relevant discipline. In fact, you seem to suggest that there are no relevantly qualified scientists! Just as well we have theologians to tell us how the world works!
You seem to have no idea of what science is about - if I understand what your penultimate sentence means (a bit garbled). Science by definition is falsifiable - it doesn't deal in absolutes - that is its strength.
revjimbob 3 years ago
Rev, do you have difficulty with the English language? I didn't imply that there are no scientists or theologians of any discipline who are trained, schooled or capable of understanding how anything works. Its simply fact. You are the one who seems to have no idea of what science is in all its grand methodology. For science's inability to deal with the fact that there are no known absolutes which always leads to the conclusion that to date, they are simply doing busy work.
onycho1 3 years ago
The complexity of reality is so infinitely impossible to understand with the finite ability scientists, theologians or Tarot card readers possess that there is no 'strength' in the scientific method whatsoever. Get used to the fact that any scientific endeavor is an exercise in futility. The ability to exist, think or understand why or how things are remains beyond the ability of the human senses to scientifically find any absolute answers.
onycho1 3 years ago
In 1999, Dr. Stephen Taylor wrote,
The Creation Research Society currently has a membership of 650 scientists, each one holding a Masters degree or above in a recognized field of science. In a recent article Dr. Russell Humphreys, physicist at Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico, estimates that there are around 10,000 practicing professional scientists in the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day creation.
onycho1 3 years ago
When asked to name a real modern scientist who believes in creation, we might start with Henry Morris. Of course, evolutionists will immediately object, claiming he isnt a real scientist. Why? Because he believes in creation. From an evolutionists point of view, anyone who believes in creation cant be a real scientist. Therefore, scientists like Henry Morris, John Morris, Larry Vardiman, Steve Austin, and Duane Gish can be discounted immediately because they work for the
onycho1 3 years ago
Institute for Creation Research. Likewise, evolutionists wont acknowledge Michael Behe, Andrew Snelling, Donald deYoung, and Kurt Wise, regardless of their academic credentials, because their creationist leanings are well-known.
This is another example of how evolutionists use circular reasoning. Circular logic concludes that no real scientist rejects evolution because the very fact that he rejects evolution means he isnt a real scientist.
Source
Ashton, In Six Days (1999) Page 284
onycho1 3 years ago
The definition of TOE is known by all scientists as the THEORY OF EVERYTHING or TOE.
This would be the ultimate knowledge or formula or understanding of the actual reality of all that which is not understood by anyone today.
onycho1 3 years ago
"The Creation Research Society currently has a membership of 650 scientists, each one holding a Masters degree or above in a recognized field of science."
I notice you do not specify how many are biologists or similar. Tell us how many are qualified in a relevant discipline if you want to make a point. I.e. be honest.
revjimbob 3 years ago
Rev the Creation Research Society has a small known membership of scientists while the actual number of scientists who would rather keep their jobs and positions numbers in the thousands.
Your question is specious as there are 0 (zero) qualified relevant scientists in any discipline who know the answer to reality. All scientists, physicists, biologists or any other pedigree can say with any ABSOLUTES that they have any idea of what is the ultimate TOE.
My number of ZERO is the correct number.
onycho1 3 years ago
Painting atheists as bad people?
When I believed in ID/Creationism and God, I killed people because people thought differently...
When I became an Atheist, I am now a much better person now... Now what is the real motive here?
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
I have no idea of what you are referring to. Ben Stein simply portrayed the evolutionists in the guise of those trying to make nice to those ID scientists who do not follow the party line while at the same time that time telling them there is no place for free thought and experimentation that would threaten their hypothesis.
Where you quoted any of the scientists who don't believe evolution becoming killers of people who believed in evolution is as much a mystery as evolution speculation.
onycho1 3 years ago
Eh, the church that I used to go to advocated it, but now I am free of it :).
What I am saying is evolution doesn't kill people, people kill people.
So do you promote ID or another theory?
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
Er what church used to advocate IT (ID) but now you are free to think about everything of which you are capable. Evolution is simply another theory of life forms in which a lot of 'smart' people swallow hook, line and sinker.
Many great scientists think evolution laughable while many think it is the cat's meow. As for me, my mind is like Einstein in his famous statement - "I want to know Intelligent Design thoughts; the rest are details."
onycho1 3 years ago
But there is little chance that I or anyone else has an inkling of TOE.
Guns kill people, people don't kill guns....
onycho1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Define TOE if you do not mind.
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
Einstein was a believer in Evolution...
And can I recommend a good video which shows how many scientists really reject evolution? Or do you have a resource which lists every single scientist that rejects evolution?
The number of scientists against Evolution is less then 1%...
CamanEmpire 3 years ago