With today's technology, it's very very difficult to make a fully functional/well built mech. In this video, this guy shows that fact. Arms and hands work fine, but it can't walk properly or move its limbs faster. The mechs we see in most sci-fi won't exist for another 150-200 years. However, if we were to look at this mech and think logically, mechs can one day be fully functional and move well within 50-100 years. There are other mechs out there that actually exist and work.
@neonnwave1 Watch BostonDynamics videos. Also the one with HULC. The problem with this video is that the guy didn't use enough electronics and the actuators are probably pneumatic, slower than electric motors.
if it's too big the impinged weight impose on the earth surface per square foot = unidealistic coz all the weight in tons would be pressed on 2 foot :( and the earth surface is soil or dirt but if u look at it it's like u need a larger surfaced footing to get it properly in placed to stand that alone is hard, practical yes only if they start researching into changing the metal frame into bio frames then i'd say very practical.
Impracticality doesn't seem to rule things out. Deep underground military bases are impractical but present. Sure would be menacing to see a descendant of one of these on a battlefield. Impractical for sure.
The reason I posted this is because I was very impressed by this guys skills and abilities. He is definitely a bad ass. After all I dont have one of these and neither do you or avatarbattlemech, or paperjack.
@alansaladan@baneblade1995 underground military bases are not impractical, they could serve a variety of purposes like hiding things or serve as bomb shelters also u cant attack what u cant find, and mechs arent impractical either, they could serve for construction and if they become more fluent with their movements they could become basically giant bulletproof humans with a chaingun in each and and rocket pods on each shoulder, tanks cant really maneuver throu many obstacles a mech can
@alansaladan Underground bases are quite practical actually. Virtually impenetrable bases that are completely out of site and space efficient. But a giant walking robot that costs millions to build and maintain and would easily be knocked over by a recoiless rifle or RPG.. not so much.
Power amour like Purifiers or elementals from battletech.. much more sensible.
@alansaladan deep underground bases have shilding from biological, radioactive, and toxic weapons, they are pratical in a war that would use such weapons. and you are much more likely to get the quazi torso shaped robot with treds for movement then a full mech if you want to get to the full mech that would be a step. a 100 ton mech warrior might do a lot of dammage but when it falls down it takes a lot to, so you have to fix that also.
@alansaladan IT is interesting and somewhat impressive
Not really all that menacing and i doubt mechs ever will be, in a warzone it would just be a slow moving target. There are to many things that can go wrong with a mech, its weapons limited and if it wants to move at all it would be relatively light armored. Also deep underground military bases are practical in some cases, for security and to survive a nuclear strike. If wars were won with menacing there would be mammoth tanks..
lol your the jackass....how will they make a walking amchien that can mvoe faster than a tank? ... how can they balance a gun more powerful than a tanks on some legs? why would they use leg rather then treads? why would they? jackass
@baneblade1995 ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE JACKASS. i suppose the wright brothers couldn't make a fucking flying machine huh? i suppose some fucking caveman couldn't have invented the wheel. you sit there, denying the possibilities of mans future, and I'm the jackass. think before you speak you close minded, imperial guard, gorrilla
wow .how old are you ? like , 9? you really think, that legs are more effective than tank tracks?have you ever een a tank fall over? have you ever seen a tank get its foot stuck in a bog or wet earth? tanks are all terrain vehicles they have been designed that way, legs will never be more effective ,now how about you stop calling me a jackass (and imperial guard?) like a mindless ape,and give a proper arguement as to how a walking tank could possibly be better, your stuck now arent you
@baneblade1995 maybe not now, walking machines are up to par, but does that mean man kind cant invent new machines and eventually surpass the modern tank? (a baneblade is a tank from the imperial guard army from a game, i assumed thats why you chose it)
no, legs will never be better than treads on a battlefield , its too hard to have a fast moving vehicle with the power of a tank balanced on legs, and imagine if one of the legs was shot, then what? the 'mech' would be useless, even with multiple legs, it would move slow and have no space for a gun to go where it can actually shoot stuff around it easily. military minds worked hard perfecting the tank, you think they never considered legs? theyre too impractical(my name is irrelevant)
the only way a walking machine in battle would be useful was if it was some sort of exo skeleton "power armour" , allowing a soldier to be more protected and carry more fire pwoer, but you cant compare that to a tank, expecially since it would need a human body to guide its movement and keep it balanced
@baneblade1995 how can you limit it the possible uses of mechs to power armor alone? and if they were big enough (gundam size) they would easily be able to hold more firepower than 15 tanks. and who says it needs a human body to guide it? humanoid robots we have now dont require humans to pilot them. take mechwarrior for example, its like piloting a tank, its just faster, stronger, has more guns, and can fly.
@baneblade1995 whole world dont believe human can fly, but the wright brother made first machine which can fly in the sky. People living on earth doesn't believe human can reach to moon, but July 20, 1969 the first person who step on moon Neil Armstrong create history. you might the right person dont believe right now but in future you will be among those others gonna accept unbelieve fact.
@baneblade1995 You obviously never played Mechwarrior where mechs will run at 150+ kph which equals roughly 93 mph and even though those are small mechs they still pack more firepower than tanks, and that makes them faster than most tanks
you are talking about a game .... LOL ... yeah, because everything they show you in that is scientfically correct and possible ... lol .... how bout you go find out about a REAL 'mech' and how it runs faster than a tank can drive, and carries mroe firepower while remaining stable then come back and give me facts of reality, not from ur kiddy game ...
@baneblade1995 wow you are Yes it is quite scientifically possible. We just don't have systems right now that would keep a mech stable while walking under its own power. But theoretically it is very possible to have a mech like they do in Mechwarrior (my "kiddie game"). You should play Mechwarrior its a great game and definitely not a kiddie game much too complicated for ones quite young, maybe too complicated for idiots like you too, so maybe you should stick with your Justin Bieber sing along
... LOL ...you seem to have strayed from my point that a walker will never be as good as a tank ... also, what are these systems that we do not have yet which are required for a walker? do you even know?sirely this 'complicated' game tells you exactly how a walker is made, and that it definitley is possible...lol....i love how you try to mock me. and yet when i was being rather mature you bring a GAME into an arguement as EVIDENCE that walkers are better than tanks .... lol
@baneblade1995 These systems that i am speaking of is called Gyro Stabilizers. We currently do not have anything that could really keep something as big as a Mech stable under its own power, they would just fall over. Honda is experimenting with robots that can keep their own balance so progress is being made, we just have nothing that would work on such a scale, but when or if we do Mechs would be quite powerful, much more expensive then a tank due to the technology that would go into it
@baneblade1995 but you can fit all sorts of armorment on it, but naturally I am speaking in theories but so do you because there are no Mechs in real life to really compaire it to. Just cheep imitations of a vehicle that only exists in a sci-fi world so therefore you have no grounds to base your claims on either, so your argument holds no ground.
With today's technology, it's very very difficult to make a fully functional/well built mech. In this video, this guy shows that fact. Arms and hands work fine, but it can't walk properly or move its limbs faster. The mechs we see in most sci-fi won't exist for another 150-200 years. However, if we were to look at this mech and think logically, mechs can one day be fully functional and move well within 50-100 years. There are other mechs out there that actually exist and work.
neonnwave1 1 week ago
@neonnwave1 Watch BostonDynamics videos. Also the one with HULC. The problem with this video is that the guy didn't use enough electronics and the actuators are probably pneumatic, slower than electric motors.
shaider1982 6 days ago
"Get away from her, you bitch!"
LuckyAmericanFilms 1 week ago
mech stand
CharyHoo 2 months ago
if it's too big the impinged weight impose on the earth surface per square foot = unidealistic coz all the weight in tons would be pressed on 2 foot :( and the earth surface is soil or dirt but if u look at it it's like u need a larger surfaced footing to get it properly in placed to stand that alone is hard, practical yes only if they start researching into changing the metal frame into bio frames then i'd say very practical.
5sweatingpalm 2 months ago
waste of money and time
tomytza123 2 months ago
more like a mech lean not a walk or a step...
katzruler 2 months ago
Gotta love all the haters in the comments. Go back and play your xbox morons. You'll all be working for this guy someday
inspades1 3 months ago
Needs gyro-stabilization.
fredrickpendragon 3 months ago
fake
stickmister321 3 months ago
can't we just put wheels on it that would make things ALOT easier
BladeOfForsaken 4 months ago
Rename to "mech stand."
mg03nma 5 months ago
you lie, it's not walking. maybe in 10 years we can develope practical mecha?
CodenameBourbon 1 year ago
mechs arent impractical, and they dont have to be slow,only small minded people would claim that
assassinXXnissassa 1 year ago
nice walk....0 steps. impressive!
TRaddcliff 1 year ago 15
mechs will never happen, theyre impractical.....why have a slow walking machine with a gun on it when u can have a tank?
baneblade1995 1 year ago
@baneblade1995
Impracticality doesn't seem to rule things out. Deep underground military bases are impractical but present. Sure would be menacing to see a descendant of one of these on a battlefield. Impractical for sure.
The reason I posted this is because I was very impressed by this guys skills and abilities. He is definitely a bad ass. After all I dont have one of these and neither do you or avatarbattlemech, or paperjack.
Congrats to the guy who built the mech here.
alansaladan 1 year ago 6
@alansaladan @baneblade1995 underground military bases are not impractical, they could serve a variety of purposes like hiding things or serve as bomb shelters also u cant attack what u cant find, and mechs arent impractical either, they could serve for construction and if they become more fluent with their movements they could become basically giant bulletproof humans with a chaingun in each and and rocket pods on each shoulder, tanks cant really maneuver throu many obstacles a mech can
NaitomeaSpartan 2 months ago
@alansaladan Underground bases are quite practical actually. Virtually impenetrable bases that are completely out of site and space efficient. But a giant walking robot that costs millions to build and maintain and would easily be knocked over by a recoiless rifle or RPG.. not so much.
Power amour like Purifiers or elementals from battletech.. much more sensible.
Darien331 2 months ago
@alansaladan deep underground bases have shilding from biological, radioactive, and toxic weapons, they are pratical in a war that would use such weapons. and you are much more likely to get the quazi torso shaped robot with treds for movement then a full mech if you want to get to the full mech that would be a step. a 100 ton mech warrior might do a lot of dammage but when it falls down it takes a lot to, so you have to fix that also.
madasnave 2 months ago
@alansaladan IT is interesting and somewhat impressive
Not really all that menacing and i doubt mechs ever will be, in a warzone it would just be a slow moving target. There are to many things that can go wrong with a mech, its weapons limited and if it wants to move at all it would be relatively light armored. Also deep underground military bases are practical in some cases, for security and to survive a nuclear strike. If wars were won with menacing there would be mammoth tanks..
SpiderMonkeyA69 2 months ago
@baneblade1995
tanks are not fast but i agree they are impractical
fuzzflip 11 months ago
@baneblade1995 what happens when they become faster, stronger, and more deadly than any tank? what then jackass!?!?
dagyadg 4 months ago
@dagyadg
lol your the jackass....how will they make a walking amchien that can mvoe faster than a tank? ... how can they balance a gun more powerful than a tanks on some legs? why would they use leg rather then treads? why would they? jackass
baneblade1995 4 months ago
@baneblade1995 ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE JACKASS. i suppose the wright brothers couldn't make a fucking flying machine huh? i suppose some fucking caveman couldn't have invented the wheel. you sit there, denying the possibilities of mans future, and I'm the jackass. think before you speak you close minded, imperial guard, gorrilla
dagyadg 4 months ago
@dagyadg
wow .how old are you ? like , 9? you really think, that legs are more effective than tank tracks?have you ever een a tank fall over? have you ever seen a tank get its foot stuck in a bog or wet earth? tanks are all terrain vehicles they have been designed that way, legs will never be more effective ,now how about you stop calling me a jackass (and imperial guard?) like a mindless ape,and give a proper arguement as to how a walking tank could possibly be better, your stuck now arent you
baneblade1995 4 months ago
@baneblade1995 maybe not now, walking machines are up to par, but does that mean man kind cant invent new machines and eventually surpass the modern tank? (a baneblade is a tank from the imperial guard army from a game, i assumed thats why you chose it)
dagyadg 4 months ago
@dagyadg
no, legs will never be better than treads on a battlefield , its too hard to have a fast moving vehicle with the power of a tank balanced on legs, and imagine if one of the legs was shot, then what? the 'mech' would be useless, even with multiple legs, it would move slow and have no space for a gun to go where it can actually shoot stuff around it easily. military minds worked hard perfecting the tank, you think they never considered legs? theyre too impractical(my name is irrelevant)
baneblade1995 4 months ago
@dagyadg
the only way a walking machine in battle would be useful was if it was some sort of exo skeleton "power armour" , allowing a soldier to be more protected and carry more fire pwoer, but you cant compare that to a tank, expecially since it would need a human body to guide its movement and keep it balanced
baneblade1995 4 months ago
@baneblade1995 how can you limit it the possible uses of mechs to power armor alone? and if they were big enough (gundam size) they would easily be able to hold more firepower than 15 tanks. and who says it needs a human body to guide it? humanoid robots we have now dont require humans to pilot them. take mechwarrior for example, its like piloting a tank, its just faster, stronger, has more guns, and can fly.
dagyadg 4 months ago
@baneblade1995 whole world dont believe human can fly, but the wright brother made first machine which can fly in the sky. People living on earth doesn't believe human can reach to moon, but July 20, 1969 the first person who step on moon Neil Armstrong create history. you might the right person dont believe right now but in future you will be among those others gonna accept unbelieve fact.
nova916 4 months ago
@baneblade1995 You obviously never played Mechwarrior where mechs will run at 150+ kph which equals roughly 93 mph and even though those are small mechs they still pack more firepower than tanks, and that makes them faster than most tanks
Anthrawn 2 months ago
@Anthrawn
you are talking about a game .... LOL ... yeah, because everything they show you in that is scientfically correct and possible ... lol .... how bout you go find out about a REAL 'mech' and how it runs faster than a tank can drive, and carries mroe firepower while remaining stable then come back and give me facts of reality, not from ur kiddy game ...
baneblade1995 2 months ago
@baneblade1995 wow you are Yes it is quite scientifically possible. We just don't have systems right now that would keep a mech stable while walking under its own power. But theoretically it is very possible to have a mech like they do in Mechwarrior (my "kiddie game"). You should play Mechwarrior its a great game and definitely not a kiddie game much too complicated for ones quite young, maybe too complicated for idiots like you too, so maybe you should stick with your Justin Bieber sing along
Anthrawn 2 months ago
@Anthrawn
... LOL ...you seem to have strayed from my point that a walker will never be as good as a tank ... also, what are these systems that we do not have yet which are required for a walker? do you even know?sirely this 'complicated' game tells you exactly how a walker is made, and that it definitley is possible...lol....i love how you try to mock me. and yet when i was being rather mature you bring a GAME into an arguement as EVIDENCE that walkers are better than tanks .... lol
baneblade1995 2 months ago
@baneblade1995 These systems that i am speaking of is called Gyro Stabilizers. We currently do not have anything that could really keep something as big as a Mech stable under its own power, they would just fall over. Honda is experimenting with robots that can keep their own balance so progress is being made, we just have nothing that would work on such a scale, but when or if we do Mechs would be quite powerful, much more expensive then a tank due to the technology that would go into it
Anthrawn 2 months ago
@baneblade1995 but you can fit all sorts of armorment on it, but naturally I am speaking in theories but so do you because there are no Mechs in real life to really compaire it to. Just cheep imitations of a vehicle that only exists in a sci-fi world so therefore you have no grounds to base your claims on either, so your argument holds no ground.
Anthrawn 2 months ago
@baneblade1995 They're planning to use them for loading weapons onto planes to begin with. search sarcos robot and you should see one.
swissoligarch 2 months ago
@baneblade1995 Who says it has to be slow?
gary7vn 1 week ago
@baneblade1995 Look at what's BostonDynamics has done.
shaider1982 6 days ago
Run Forest RUN!
TheShadeWalker 1 year ago
its knee caps are non jointed so....it can barely walk properly.
Avatarbatlemecha 2 years ago
crapy ass camera
blueflame9090 2 years ago
pathetic
paperjack93 2 years ago
Yup... this is going to take some time.
I need a job so I can earn money and help this guy one day.
ManintheArmor 2 years ago
lol wtf is that
nice work
ericrubinoff 3 years ago
WTH is that thing?
frogjedi4 4 years ago
looool
sh00ky 3 years ago