#25 The Assault Weapons Ban Worked! Quick Questions For Gun Control Advocates

[TheNewJerseyGhost]

don't criminals use small caliber handguns most of the time?

[Kiddeth]

hmmm. yea I can't recall a single one.

[SGTBaker23]

I try not to think back to what I refer to as the Dark Decade of America, but I cannot recall a single bayoneting.

[pete5668]

LOL! man, you're killin' me!

[dippst]

why do people automatically think any and all guns are going to be used to kill people? i am pro gun through and through and on my 18th birthday i plan to go to walmart and get a cricket 22 and a few hundred rounds. the biggest thing i will even line up in the sights is a ground hog. my uncle and his dad have over 20 firearms between the 2 (im sure there's more, thats just all i counted) and they never killed anyone. they used to hunt but they did that with bows as well.

[dippst]

@dippst

by the way, where do you even get a bayonet? i think the grenade launcher ban worked without working. it didnt work because grenades are/were illegal in several areas and there really is no practical use for them outside of pretty explosions.

[stetsonwalker]

@dippst My SKS has a bayonet.

[Budney420]

Attn. gun control advocates: Read the Constitution, The Articles of Confederation and the Federalist Papers. 234 years ago the Founders understood the potential for government corruption and abuse of power. The 2nd was incorporated so that the citizenry would be in a position to protect the inherent individual rights promised to them. It's that simple! When the time comes you gun controllers will be thankful for the militias!

[VeediotCommander]

hahaha You know what? You're right. I cannot think of one Drive-by Bayoneting within those ten years! But my gawd, before that law was passed we had several where I lived in Liberalton, CA. We also had a lot of guns spontaniously getting up and killing people on their own too.

[PowerInMN]

Brilliant!

[MyFartsRock]

I think the gun laws are just fine were they are and seem to be working. Of all the public massacre that had happend in the last 15 years nobody has shot back. ( yes sarcasm)

[stetsonwalker]

@MyFartsRock I guess you missed the California bank robbery where the guys were armored up and killed a bunch of police?

[etucker5007]

@stetsonwalker

If your talking about the north Hollywood shooting, no one was killed except for the two shooters.

[stetsonwalker]

@etucker5007 I will add a video to help you...

[etucker5007]

@stetsonwalker

Help me?

[lavahornet2]

LOL! I knew you were gonna say drive-by bayonettings!

[thatmaninblack]

Drive by bayonetting. haha

[1x8twist]

Russia has very very strickd gun laws, yet they ranked 5th in the wourld for murder rate FACT! The USA Ranked 24th FACT! I suck at Math but i can do that one.

[lastminuteregret]

@1x8twist Russia is also still developing after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and they have a very high government corruption rate and lingering lawlessness. You cannot blame their murder rate on gun laws. If you do, it shows you ignorant of the international situation, and like most Americans, ignorant of domestic politics of another nation.

[patsfanczar]

It tells you that their laws are not working. It also tells you what sort of government imposes gun control laws. Just imagine what it would be like if there were no laws controlling guns there.

[lastminuteregret]

@patsfanczar The mob is uncontrollable and unruly, and cannot exist in a civilized fashion without a strong government in control. As bad as this sounds, this is what the framers thought in forming the constitution. They didn't even give the average person the vote for President, aka the electoral college. I'm fairly certain if the framers walked up into the modern world, and we asked them if everyone should be able to own a civilian m4, they'd laugh in our faces.

[ImWatchinTheTube]

@lastminuteregret I disagree. The founding fathers would want civilians to have an equal playing field with government soldiers, otherwise there would be no way to prevent tyranny. In the 1780's everyone had roughly the same type of firearm (muzzle loading single shot), thus noone had a significant advantage. In modern times the police and military have full auto firearms, whereas the civilians are regulated to semi-auto only, unless it's made before 1986.

Next post.

[etucker5007]

@ImWatchinTheTube

Not to mention that the government has grenade launchers, short barrel shotguns, flash bangs, and grenades, and a host of other small arms not available to civilians.

I agree with you.

[ImWatchinTheTube]

@etucker5007 Yes, indeed. When talking heads on TV say things like "You think civilians should have these Deadly Assault Weapons? What's next? Should people be allowed to have RPGs?" That's when I start to laugh and say... "Yes."

[etucker5007]

@ImWatchinTheTube

LOL yeah

[etucker5007]

@ImWatchinTheTube

I used to think that things like grenade launchers, rockets, hand grenades and the like should be illegal. After all, they are more dangerous than firearms.

I changed my mind when I saw a story on the Mexican drug gangs. There were RPGs, machine guns, and explosives. I saw a whole pick nick table covered with 40mm grenades. I thought, "hmm I'm a little out gunned"

All that stuff is illegal and the bad guys still have them, why should I be restricted from them?

[ImWatchinTheTube]

@lastminuteregret Thus if the government ever gets to the point of being intolerable by the civilians (I'm not saying the government is there now!) we would be at a disadvantage.

If you don't think the founding fathers thought citizenry should overthrow a tyrannical opressive government, you should probably read the Declaration of Independence.

[lastminuteregret]

@ImWatchinTheTube Guns aren't really going to help you if the government does decide to turn against the people. They have armoured vehicles, tanks, the largest and most advanced air force, and the largest and most advanced Navy. The only thing to stop the government from completely establishing itself over the people is the existence of our military as a volunteer force and its pledge to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

[ImWatchinTheTube]

@lastminuteregret I disagree that guns wouldn't help the people. In the 1940s the Germans had one of the best equipped/organized armies in the world. And yet the French resisted them, generally with double barreled shotguns. You're thinking that the people would be going head to head with the US Army like conventional armies, if that were whe case they would get destroyed, but instead it would be an underground resistance, and they would be called terrorists, same as the IRA.

[SGTBaker23]

Perhaps the assault weapons ban would have been more effective if it had banned something useful. I am referring to a Nation wide ban on trigger fingers... whose with me?

If you thought that was funny then don't, they would probably do it if they could. The AWB was just a foot in the door move to test if they could get away with banning certain weapons. Next they will try again with more weapons and accessories until finally, Trigger Finger Bans will go into effect.

Keep em Coming Keith.

[TheBassmaster95]

Dude, I almost knew that was coming. Good one, good one.

[serafine666]

No, thank heavens. The law also seems to have prevented those big men with giant bulging muscles walking around wielding rifles like pistols (because rifles had a pistol grip) because I didn't see any of them either. And during the assault weapons ban, guns were much more fluffy and cuddly instead of all scary with their telescopic sticks and assault weapon styling. Yes indeed, that ban sure worked! Now, if only it'd stopped a single crime...

[101ELCID]

is that ur real hair?

[DeadeyeKeith]

Yes, jealous? ;-)

[zcm007attack]

I'm not sure I really understand your point, Keith. Could you explain it to me? thanx

[DeadeyeKeith]

@zcm007 attack

I am using satire to prove the uselessness of the AWB. Why in the world did it include mounts for bayonets? Was there a rash of drive-by bayonettings that suddenly ceased because of the ban?

Follow me?

[666FreeBySatan666]

You don't really need guns. I never really had guns even before I was prohibited by law to own a gun. I killed 4 home intruders with a pickaxe handle, cold steel ghurka kukri and a chair leg. And no I got away with self defense, I got prohibited by law because I assaulted a police officer.

[DeadeyeKeith]

Just because YOU may not have needed a gun does not mean that someone else will not. I post these videos to because I believe that we have the inherent right to self defense. I also believe that I have the right to decide how I will protect myself.

[JXZjeremy]

You....Had.....me.......

You are Hilarious.

[Mossy500A]

Brilliant!!!

[CleanHappyGlock]

So true. To add to this, there was also no M203s used ether.

[hkct45]

Good one!!!

5/5 & Faved!!!

[Yakko77]

I've asked that question so many times myself to gun control advocates.

Though a grenade launcher would be nice.....

[eje1079]

Awesome vid Keith. Thanks for sending. Those drive by bayonettings take too much work. You actually have to hang out the car window and be reasonbly close to your target. Too much work indeed. Lol.

[jake262144]

Ha ha, you rock Keith!

That's what I call Good Stuff!

5*

[Korostylev]

Плохо что я не очень хорошо знаю английский.(( Непонимаю о чём речь .

=))

[DeadeyeKeith]

Speaking Russian? Come on man! No fair! ;-)

[TexasShooterSA]

He basically said "Too bad I don't know english very well".

[ARVNpistola313]

No, I can't. you're absolutely right. Lmfaooo

[ArcanineTheFurry]

Hhahahahhaha. Dumb gun control advocates. Drive By bayonetting XD

[VinnyS914]

Not for nothing but aren't grenade launchers automatically outlawed anyway? The Ban required full background investigations so that nut fuckers like Hinkley couldn't legally buy a gun. But Biden put his bleeding heart liberal shit in there because he hates guns. I wonder if Biden told his protection detail not to carry firearms.